Shasta-Trinity National Forest; California; Highway 89 Safety Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project, 55323-55327 [2015-23157]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest;
California; Highway 89 Safety
Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem
Restoration Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
With the Highway 89 Safety
Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem
Restoration Project (Highway 89
project), the Shasta-Trinity National
Forest (Forest) is proposing to improve
public safety along California State
Highway 89 (Highway 89) and restore
forest health throughout approximately
13,514 acres of forest by:
Addressing infrastructure needs
(National Forest System roads and
helispot, developed recreation areas);
Reducing the risk of uncharacteristic
wildfire by reducing fuel loads, thinning
overstocked stands, and gradually
returning fire to the landscape both
along the highway corridor and within
the surrounding forest; and
Restoring resilient forest structures,
patterns, and disturbance regimes by
reducing stand densities, retaining and
releasing larger trees, increasing underrepresented forest vegetation such as
aspen and oak, and providing forest
structural diversity across the
landscape.
The 13,514 acre project area is located
in Siskiyou County, California, north
and south of Highway 89, from near the
junction of Highway 89 with Interstate
5 (Mount Shasta, California area), east to
the Cattle Camp turnoff (Forest Roads
43N19 and 40N44). The project
boundary extends up to 2.5 miles from
the highway and is bounded by the
McCloud River, private property, and
major Forest roads. The large landscape
selected encompasses both complex
natural forest stands that retain more
spatial heterogeneity combined with
simplified forest stands that are
typically homogeneous in structure and
include uniform stands of small and
medium-sized trees within plantations.
Using logical landscape boundaries,
including the river, private property,
roads, and other restored landscapes
(Algoma Vegetation Management
Project) fosters restoration of resilient
forest structures, patterns, and
disturbance regimes which are lacking.
The legal location is: Township 39
North, Range 1 West, Sections 2–10, 17–
18; Township 39 North, Range 2 West,
Sections 1–3, 12; Township 40 North,
Range 1 West, Sections 27, 28, 31–34;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Sep 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
Township 40 North, Range 2 West,
Sections 34–36; Township 40 North,
Range 3 West, Sections 32–33;
Township 40 North, Range 4 West,
Sections 22–26, 34, Mt. Diablo
Meridian. Elevations range from 3,200
to 4,400 feet.
Project treatments include thinning
along the Highway 89 corridor, thinning
in plantations and in natural forest
stands throughout the 13,514 acres,
hazard tree removal, prescribed burning,
Forest road management, and
developing a helispot.
DATES: Comments concerning this scope
of the analysis must be received by
October 15, 2015. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in December, 2015 and the
final environmental impact statement is
expected in May 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Carolyn Napper, District Ranger, ShastaMcCloud Management Unit, 204 W.
Alma St., Mt. Shasta, California 96067,
Attn. Heather McRae. Comments may
also be sent via email to: commentspacificsw-shasta-trinity-mtshastamccloud@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
(530) 926–5120.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather McRae, Fuels Specialist, at
(530) 964–3770 or hmcrae@fs.fed.us, or
Ann Glubczynski, Natural Resource
Planner, at (530) 964–3717 or
aglubczynski@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
project purpose and need for action is
generated by looking at the difference
between the existing conditions and the
desired conditions [as identified in the
Shasta-Trinity National Forest Land
Resource Management Plan (Forest
Plan)] in the project area.
Highway 89 Corridor
Existing Conditions: The Highway 89
corridor is defined as the area that
extends up to 275 feet out from the edge
of the pavement on both sides of the
two-lane highway. This corridor is
composed of three sections between
Interstate 5 (I–5) and Cattle Camp
(Forest roads 43N19 and 40N44), for a
total of 10.2 miles. The California
Department of Transportation
(CalTrans) right of way (ROW) along the
highway varies from 80 to 200 feet from
the roadway centerline through the
project area.
The vegetation along portions of the
Highway 89 corridor includes tall,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55323
dense forest stands that are close to the
road shoulder and cast shadows on the
pavement. During the winter months,
the shade on the roadway keeps snow
and ice from melting for up to several
weeks following a storm. Trees
immediately adjacent to the highway
with overhanging branches can drop
snow loads onto the highway and
passing vehicles. These branches collect
snow, until the snow becomes too
heavy, and drops onto the roadway.
Snow from overhanging branches has
been known to hit the windshields of
vehicles as it falls, even breaking some
windshields. In many areas, the trees
and brush are very dense, growing
within the ROW, which makes snow
removal from the paved traffic lanes
difficult.
During the entire year, vegetation
along the highway also limits visibility
for drivers to see wildlife moving from
the forest onto the highway. Numerous
animal and vehicle collisions have
occurred along the highway in the
project area, because drivers are not able
to see animals entering the roadway
until they are so close that it is difficult
to stop or even slow down.
Dense vegetation, tree mortality, and
large amounts of dead vegetation and
debris along Highway 89 have increased
the likelihood that a fire starting or
burning along the highway could spread
quickly to threaten surrounding forests
and communities, or allow for a fire to
cross the highway, and be difficult to
control during dry summer conditions.
Highway 89 also serves as an evacuation
route for residents to leave and
emergency personnel to access the area.
Desired Future Conditions: Sunlight is
able to reach the Highway 89 road
surface during winter months, enabling
snow and ice to melt from the roadway
more quickly. There are fewer trees with
branches hanging over Highway 89.
Drivers along Highway 89 have
adequate sight distance and an open
view of wildlife entering the roadway to
respond as necessary.
Sufficient gaps in vegetation exist
along Highway 89 to allow for efficient
snow removal during heavy snowfalls.
Vegetation conditions and predicted
fire behavior along Highway 89 are such
that a wildfire during summer months is
less likely to spread along or across the
highway, is less likely to threaten
surrounding forests and communities,
and would not limit access for
firefighters, or egress for citizens.
Forest Roads, Powerline Corridors and
Helispot
Existing Conditions: There are many
Forest roads within the project area. The
conditions of these roads vary, from
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55324
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices
well maintained to nearly undrivable.
Brush and trees encroach on some
roadways making them undrivable or
difficult to drive on and therefore unsafe
for users. Many Forest roads are used
frequently by Forest visitors to access
areas where they recreate, or for
recreation activities such as biking,
horse-back riding, or driving off
highway vehicles (OHVs). Some of these
roads have reduced access for
recreational opportunities due to their
poor condition or being overgrown.
Some roads that are open are not
heavily used, nor are they needed for
resource management activities. There
are many user-created routes in the
project area that are not part of the
Forest transportation system
(unauthorized routes) and not needed
for resource management activities. But
several Forest Transportation System
roads and one unauthorized route in the
project area that are currently closed or
inaccessible do provide critical access
for resource management activities.
Powerlines crossing through the
project area are maintained by the
power companies, who currently
remove vegetation within the power line
corridor ROW. However, in some areas,
such as near the community of Mount
Shasta, dense forest stands on NFS
lands are growing right up to the
powerline corridors. The safety of
firefighters responding to a fire near
these powerlines is at risk. There is no
break in the vegetation sufficient to
safely put firefighters near the
powerlines during a wildfire to protect
them.
There is an existing helispot located
behind the Ash Creek Guard Station
where trees are obstructing the take-off
and landing paths for helicopters. These
trees are part of a seed orchard of
specially bred trees. Cutting these trees
would result in the loss of valuable
genetic research. The effectiveness of
the helispot is increasingly hazardous
due to the height of adjacent trees, and
we expect that within 10 years the
helispot will no longer be usable. There
is currently no other suitable landing
spot for helicopters in the general
vicinity.
Desired Future Conditions: Roads on
the Forest transportation system that are
needed for current and future resource
management or recreation access have
been maintained to provide safe access
for forest management and recreation
activities, including: OHV riding,
horseback riding, and biking (activities
the public has indicated are important
to them). Forest transportation system
roads used for Forest resource
management are closed when not in use.
Unauthorized routes that do not meet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Sep 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
management needs are decommissioned
and become revegetated. Forest system
roads and trails that access rivers and
streams for water-oriented recreation
activities are improved, and roads and
trails to hunting, fishing and wildlife
viewing areas are maintained at an
appropriate maintenance level.
Vegetation on both sides of the
powerline ROW is managed to reduce
potential impacts during wildfire.
Overstory, ladder, and surface fuels
would be reduced such that the
potential for crown fire during summer
conditions is unlikely. Anticipated fire
behavior during summer conditions is
such that firefighters can safely manage
a fire in the vicinity of the powerlines.
A new helispot is located east of
McCloud, with sufficient clearance to
allow a medical evacuation (medevac)
helicopter to land and transport a
patient. This helispot is also available to
support fire operations.
Developed Recreation Areas
Existing Conditions: Developed
recreation areas within the project
boundary include those within the
McCloud River Loop area, specifically:
Fowlers, Cattle Camp and Camp 4
Campgrounds, Lower, Middle, and
Upper Falls picnic areas, Lakin Dam
and Cattle Camp Swimming Hole day
use sites, the McCloud River Trail, and
the Vista Point along Highway 89.
Many of the forest stands in the
recreation areas are overly dense and at
risk of density-related mortality.
Evidence of root disease and insect
damage has been observed, and high
fuel loading from mortality is present
throughout the area, increasing the
likelihood of undesirable effects in the
event of a wildfire.
In the Cattle Camp Campground, there
has been an increase in tree mortality
over the past five years. Within the
developed campgrounds and other
recreation sites in the McCloud River
corridor, hazard trees continue to be a
concern for public safety. Excessive
hazardous fuel accumulations can
increase the potential for intense
wildfires.
Vegetation is blocking views of the
McCloud River from many of the
developed recreation sites such as
Fowlers Campground and views of
Mount Shasta from the Vista Point.
Desired Future Conditions: Hazardous
fuels are reduced to the standards under
the Forest Plan, allowing fire managers
to effectively protect life, property, and
natural resources during a wildfire.
Hazard trees in developed recreation
sites, along trails, and in campgrounds
are removed for forest health and public
safety. Forest stands within and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
surrounding campgrounds are healthy.
Opportunities exist to view the
McCloud River within the developed
recreation sites and trails, and to view
Mount Shasta from the Vista Point on
Highway 89.
Wildland Urban Interface Defense
Zones (Defined as Areas Up to 1⁄4 Mile
From Structures)
Existing Conditions: Fuels have been
reduced in a portion of the Wildland
Urban Interface (WUI) in recent years
around the communities of McCloud
and Mount Shasta. However, there are
numerous forest stands and brushy
areas where fuels have not been
reduced. Some of the treated stands are
still in a condition that could sustain a
wildfire with potential impacts to
homes and private property, especially
in the WUI defense zones near Mount
Shasta and on Snowman’s Hill.
Desired Future Conditions: In the
WUI defense zones around the
community of Mt. Shasta and
Snowman’s Hill, fuel loading has been
managed and reduced to the Forest Plan
standards. Vegetation is managed to
achieve 4-foot flame lengths or less
during 97th percentile weather
conditions. There is sufficient ingress/
egress clearance and limited chances of
crown fire.
Forest Ecosystem Health
Existing Conditions: The project area
is a combination of plantations and
natural (non-plantation) forest stands.
The primarily ponderosa pine
plantations range in age from less than
10 years to over 70 years. Some of the
plantations have had recent treatments
(brush mastication, thinning, pruning).
Others have not and are overstocked,
with interlocking tree crowns and
decadent woody shrubs, making them
vulnerable to mortality from insects and
fire. Mortality has occurred within some
of the plantations, resulting in pockets
of dead trees. The plantations lack age,
structure, and species diversity, and
some were subject to windrowing (a site
preparation method which resulted in
piles of topsoil) and mechanical
planting in the past.
Most of the natural forest stands are
overly dense and at risk of densityrelated mortality. Mortality pockets are
starting to occur across the project area.
Root diseases, such as black stain and
Heterobasidion, along with evidence of
insect damage, have been observed in
many locations. Dense and dying
knobcone pine stands are far outside of
their natural range of variation both in
overall numbers as well as percent
composition and are creating
unnaturally large fuel loads.
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices
Windrows were created in several
plantations prior to planting as a way to
remove competing vegetation.
Windrowing reduced overall soil
productivity by scalping and piling
nutrient rich topsoil, which displaced
nutrients and soil organic matter in the
piles and left poorer quality subsoil
exposed for tree planting.
Areas dominated by bitterbrush,
individual black oak trees, and stands of
aspen and oak (important for vegetative
diversity and wildlife habitat) are being
encroached on by conifers, which are
shading out these shrubs/trees. Due to a
lack of disturbance, forest stands have
followed a process of succession in
which conifers grow taller than aspen
and oak, blocking the sunlight these
species need. Conifers are competing for
soil nutrients and water with the other
tree and shrub species. Aspen stands are
declining at a rapid rate due to past
management such as fire suppression,
timber management (removing aspen
and planting conifers), livestock grazing
and site conversion. Bitterbrush stands
are mostly even-aged and decadent with
limited regeneration or new growth, and
there are encroaching conifers at the
edges of and within the bitterbrush
stands.
Some Riparian Reserve areas located
within the McCloud River corridor
(inner gorge) contain dense pockets of
young conifers encroaching on the
riparian vegetation as well as dead and
dying trees. Some of these areas are
adjacent to trails, such as the McCloud
River Trail, and recreation sites.
Effective fire suppression in the last
century has greatly reduced the total
area burned when compared to prehistoric levels. Approximately 73% of
the project area historically experienced
a high frequency (0–35 year return
interval), low to mixed severity fire
regime. Approximately 6% of the
project area historically experienced a
high frequency (0–35 year return
interval), high severity fire regime,
while 6% of the project area evolved
under a low frequency (35–100 year)
high severity fire regime (non-burnable
area accounts for the remaining 15%).
Based on the historic fire return
intervals and fire history data, the
project area is outside the historical
range for fire occurrence.
Approximately 80% of the project area
is designated as a high departure from
the historical fire return interval range.
These areas have missed multiple fire
return intervals. The remaining 4% of
burnable area is at a moderate
departure, missing one or more return
intervals. This departure has resulted in
changes to vegetation characteristics
(species composition, structural stages,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Sep 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
stand age, canopy closure, and mosaic
pattern); fuel composition; fire
frequency, severity, and pattern; and
insect and disease activity. The risk of
losing key ecosystem components is
high.
Desired Future Conditions:
Plantations with trees primarily 10
inches diameter at breast height (dbh) or
greater have a more multi-aged structure
with variable sizes and spacing, and
plantations with trees primarily less
than 10 inches dbh are moving toward
stands with larger sized trees. Natural
stands have densities at levels that
improve and protect forest health and
vigor. The stands have structural
diversity with varied species, multiple
canopy layers, other types of vegetation,
and appropriate levels of coarse woody
debris and snags. Plantations and
natural stands are resilient to epidemic
insect or disease attack. Knobcone pine
dominated stands more closely resemble
their historic conditions of other species
such as ponderosa pine, incense cedar
and white fir mixed in with the
knobcone.
In plantations with windrows, the
windrows have been respread,
redistributing the topsoil and nutrients
throughout the plantation. Overall soil
quality and productivity are improved
in the plantations providing more
nutrients to the trees.
Hardwoods, especially oaks and
aspen, remain a healthy and vigorous
component of forest stands where they
are naturally located. In hardwooddominated stands, there are fewer
conifers competing for resources
(sunlight, nutrients, water) with the
hardwoods. Bitterbrush stands have a
mix of age and condition classes and
also have limited competition from
conifers. In riparian areas, the species
composition and structural diversity of
the native vegetation maintain a healthy
riparian ecosystem, without excess
competition for resources from conifers.
All stands and vegetation types
experience fires at intervals that are
historic to the area, have appropriate
coarse woody debris and snag levels,
but do not have excess fuel loads.
Wildfires that occur within the project
area during dry summer conditions are
beneficial to the ecosystem, as occurred
historically.
Purpose and Need
For the Highway 89 corridor, there is
a need to:
(1) Cut vegetation throughout the
highway corridor, so that the forest
canopy is more open, allowing
increased winter sunlight on the
roadway and faster melting of snow and
ice on the pavement.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55325
(2) Manage vegetation along the
highway for increased driver sight
distance to reduce the risk of vehiclewildlife collisions.
(3) Remove vegetation along the road
shoulders for space to place plowed/
blown snow during storms.
(4) Reduce fuels along Highway 89 to
allow for a more effective fire response
during summer conditions.
For Forest roads, powerline corridors
and helispot facilities, there is a need:
(1) To ensure that roads needed for
Forest resource management are
maintained or repaired to meet Forest
standards and closed when not in use.
Roads needed fror recreation access are
maintained and repaired to meet Forest
standards and public safety needs.
Roads not needed for Forest
management or recreation access are
decommissioned. Roads are added or
removed from the Forest transportation
system as appropriate.
(2) For a helispot east of McCloud to
facilitate a medical evacuation and an
appropriate fire management response.
(3) To reduce hazardous fuels levels
(surface fuel loadings, ladder fuels, and
vegetation densities) along powerlines,
to increase firefighter safety during a
wildfire.
For developed recreation areas, there
is a need to:
(1) Increase visitor safety from hazard
trees and the risk of wildfires, including
along the McCloud River Trail, and
improve access within and surrounding
the developed recreation sites.
(2) Improve the views throughout the
project area, including Mt. Shasta, the
McCloud River, and the natural
landscape.
For the WUI defense zones, there is a
need to:
(1) Reduce hazardous fuel levels
(surface fuel loadings, ladder fuels, and
vegetation densities) within the defense
zones to achieve 4-foot flame lengths or
less during 97th percentile weather
conditions.
For forest and ecosystem health, there
is a need to:
(1) Increase the diversity of species
composition, age, and structure in
plantations and natural forest stands.
(2) Increase resilience to fire, insects
and disease in all stands.
(3) Reduce competition by conifers in
hardwood stands, bitterbrush areas, and
riparian vegetation to ensure their
growth and vigor.
(4) Respread existing windrowed
topsoil in several plantations to
redistribute soil nutrients and organic
matter and improve overall soil
productivity.
(5) Restore the natural role of fire in
the ecosystem to facilitate vegetative
and other fire-related processes.
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
55326
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Alternative 3
The project area was divided into
treatment areas based on vegetation
type, use, and areas with special
conditions. Activities include Forest
road management, and construction of a
new helispot for medical air evacuation
and firefighting support. Silviculture
treatments such as tree thinning,
sanitation thinning and hazard tree
removal, along with fuels treatments
such as underburning, hand or machine
piling, and mastication will be
implemented to improve resilience and
health in forest stands, and improve
safety along the Highway 89 corridor, in
WUI defense zones and in developed
recreation areas.
A complete description of alternative
3, including resource protection
measures and treatment maps, can be
found in the Highway 89 Safety
Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem
Restoration Project Scoping Document
on the Shasta-Trinity National Forest
Web site at https://www.fs.usda.gov/
project/?project=43770.
In summary, to meet the purpose and
need the following treatments have been
identified (all acreages and miles are
approximate, some treatments will
overlap, occurring in the same areas).
Thinning (variable density across all
diameter classes, including understory
vegetation) of trees will be implemented
throughout the project area to reduce
relative stand densities and meet other
objectives. In some areas thinning will
create small gaps/openings in the
canopy (such as the WUI defense zone).
In other areas, clumps of trees with
wildlife sheltering structure will be
retained.
Sanitation (removing dead and dying
clumps of trees) will be implemented in
areas of disease, insect damage, and
ongoing mortality. Group selections will
be installed in larger areas of mortality
to try and slow rate of progression.
Hazard tree removal will occur
throughout the project area.
Encroaching conifers will be removed to
release riparian vegetation along the
McCloud River Corridor and from
bitterbrush fields.
These treatments will occur in:
• 3,376 acres of plantations with trees
10 inches or greater,
• 617 acres of plantations with trees
less than 10 inches dbh,
• 1,241 acres of mixed conifer natural
stands,
• 3,794 acres of pine dominated
natural stands,
• 653 acres of knobcone pine
dominated stands,
• 212 acres of the McCloud River
Corridor area,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Sep 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
• 212 acres of the Big Canyon Creek
area,
• 61 acres of bitterbrush fields, and
• 16 acres of black oak stands.
Fuels treatments will include
mastication, machine and hand piling
and pile burning, and thinning for fuel
reduction. The entire project area (with
the exception of specific sensitive areas)
will be underburned.
The treatments will yield renewable
forest by-products of both sawtimber
(logs) and biomass (chips), firewood,
and special forest products. Treatments
will be accomplished through a variety
of methods including service contacts,
force account, commercial timber
harvest, and stewardship contracts.
In addition to vegetation treatments, a
550-foot x 550-foot helispot will be
constructed across the highway from the
Ash Creek Work Station (total area of
approximately 14 acres). Forest road
management activities will include 78
miles of road maintenance, 2.8 miles of
reconstruction, 4 miles of new
temporary road construction, 7.9 miles
road/route decommissioning, 11.25
miles of road closures, 3 miles of road
openings, and 0.25 miles of road (access
to the new helispot) added to the Forest
Transportation System.
Highway 89 is designated as a Forest
Service Scenic Byway. Visual quality
objectives for the highway corridor
through National Forest land call for
retention, meaning human activities are
not visually evident to the casual forest
visitor. Trees will be removed along the
highway in view of the roadway and the
resulting changes in vegetation will be
visually evident. Depending on the
results of the scenery analysis, a Forest
Plan amendment may be required for
the project activities along the Highway
89 corridor.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity
National Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
whether to implement the proposed
alternative 3, take an alternative action
that meets the purpose and need, or take
no action.
Permits or Licenses Required
A permit would be required from the
State of California prior to burning piles.
The appropriate regulatory agencies will
be consulted regarding national or state
required permits associated with roads
used during project implementation. All
rquired permits will be obtained prior to
implementation.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Early in the project development
process, meetings were held with local
stakeholders, including representatives
from the California Department of
Transportation, the local timber
industry and American Forest Resources
Council, local fire safe and watershed
councils, environmental and citizens’
organizations, and the Pit River Tribe. It
was anticipated at that time that an
environmental assessment would be
written for the project.
The project was originally scoped in
June, 2014. The project was posted on
the Forest Schedule of Proposed Actions
(SOPA) On June 30, 2014. The Legal
Notice was published in the newspaper
of record (Record Searchlight, Redding,
California) on June 30, 2014. A notice
was also published in the Mount Shasta
Herald (Mount Shasta, California). A
scoping letter was mailed or emailed to
168 individuals, organizations, and
government agencies. The scoping
document and was posted to the ShastaTrinity National Forest Web site. The
scoping period was 30 days. Comments
were received from nine individuals,
organizations, and agencies.
In addition to the written request for
comments, the scoping phase included
two public meetings and field trips for
interested members of the public and
other government agencies. A public
meeting/field trip was held on October
4, 2014 with 11 attendees. A field trip
with representatives of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service was held on
October 31, 2014. The comments from
the scoping period and public meetings/
field trips have become part of the
Highway 89 Safety Enhancement and
Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project
record, and were considered when
developing this new alternative
(alternative 3), which is referred to as
alternative 3 in this notice of intent.
Based on the public involvement
since scoping as well as new
information, the line officer has chosen
to evaluate and document project effects
on the environment in an environmental
impact statement.
For the scoping period initiated by
this notice of intent, it is important that
reviewers provide their comments at
such times and in such manner that
they are useful to the agency’s
preparation of the environmental impact
statement. Therefore, comments should
be provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices
contentions. Comments submitted
during the first scoping period will
continue to be considered and need not
be resubmitted. This project would
implement the Forest Plan and is
subject to 36 CFR 218 subparts A and
B. All persons who provided comment
in past designated comment periods
associated with this project will have
standing to object on comment issues
previously provided however, those
interested in the project are encouraged
to review the scoping package and
provide comments. Please note that to
object per 36 CFR 218, a commenter
must have provided specific written
comments regarding the proposed
project or activity during scoping or
another designated opportunity for
public comment (in other words
objection issues must be based on
previously submitted specific written
comments except for issues that arose
after the opportunities for comment).
Please refer to 36 CFR 218.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents and may
preclude their ability to object.
Dated: September 8, 2015.
David R. Myers,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2015–23157 Filed 9–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Information Collection Activity;
Comment Request
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended), the
Rural Utilities Service, a Rural
Development agency of the United
States Department of Agriculture invites
comments on the following information
collections for which the Agency
intends to request approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Comments on this notice must be
received by November 16, 2015.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Sep 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas P. Dickson, Acting Director,
Program Development and Regulatory
Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Ave. SW., STOP 1522,
Room 5164, South Building,
Washington, DC 20250–1522.
Telephone: (202) 690–4492. Fax: (202)
720–8435.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
regulation (5 CFR part 1320)
implementing provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13) requires that interested
members of the public and affected
agencies have an opportunity to
comment on information collection and
recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR
1320.8(d)]. This notice identifies
information collections that RUS is
submitting to OMB for extension.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
this collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Comments may
be sent to Thomas P. Dickson, Acting
Director, Program Development and
Regulatory Analysis, Rural Utilities
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
STOP 1522, 1400 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20250–1522. (202)
690–4492. Fax: (202) 720–8435.
Title: Request for Approval to Sell
Capital Assets.
OMB Control Number: 0572–0020.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: A borrower’s assets provide
the security for a government loan. The
selling of assets reduces the security and
increases the risk to the government.
RUS Form 369 allows the borrower to
seek agency permission to sell some of
its assets. The form collects detailed
information regarding the proposed
sales of a portion of the borrower’s
systems. USDA Rural Development
electric utility borrowers complete this
form to request USDA Rural
Development approval in order to sell
capital assets when the fair market value
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55327
exceeds 10 percent of the borrower’s net
utility plant.
Estimate of Burden: Public Reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 3 hours per
response.
Respondents: Not-for-profit
institutions; Business or other for profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 15 hours.
Dated: September 5, 2015.
Brandon McBride,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–23087 Filed 9–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket No.: 150720626–5831–02]
Privacy Act of 1974, Amended System
of Records
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Amendment
to Privacy Act System of Records:
COMMERCE/NOAA–19, Permits and
Registrations for United States Federally
Regulated Fisheries.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
publishes this notice to announce the
effective date of a Privacy Act System of
Records notice entitled Notice of
Proposed Amendment to Privacy Act
System of Records: COMMERCE/
NOAA–19, Permits and Registrations for
United States Federally Regulated
Fisheries.
SUMMARY:
The system of records becomes
effective on September 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: For a copy of the system of
records please mail requests to: Sarah
Brabson, NOAA Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Room 9856, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
DATES:
Erin
Steiner, NOAA Fisheries, Northwest
Fisheries Science Center, FRAM
Division, 2725 Montlake Boulevard
East, Seattle, WA 98112.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
7, 2015 (80 FR 47457), the Department
of Commerce published a notice in the
Federal Register requesting comments
on a proposed new Privacy Act System
of Records notice entitled Notice of
Proposed Amendment to Privacy Act
System of Records: COMMERCE/
NOAA–19, Permits and Registrations for
United States Federally Regulated
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 178 (Tuesday, September 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55323-55327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23157]
[[Page 55323]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest; California; Highway 89 Safety
Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With the Highway 89 Safety Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem
Restoration Project (Highway 89 project), the Shasta-Trinity National
Forest (Forest) is proposing to improve public safety along California
State Highway 89 (Highway 89) and restore forest health throughout
approximately 13,514 acres of forest by:
Addressing infrastructure needs (National Forest System roads and
helispot, developed recreation areas);
Reducing the risk of uncharacteristic wildfire by reducing fuel
loads, thinning overstocked stands, and gradually returning fire to the
landscape both along the highway corridor and within the surrounding
forest; and
Restoring resilient forest structures, patterns, and disturbance
regimes by reducing stand densities, retaining and releasing larger
trees, increasing under-represented forest vegetation such as aspen and
oak, and providing forest structural diversity across the landscape.
The 13,514 acre project area is located in Siskiyou County,
California, north and south of Highway 89, from near the junction of
Highway 89 with Interstate 5 (Mount Shasta, California area), east to
the Cattle Camp turnoff (Forest Roads 43N19 and 40N44). The project
boundary extends up to 2.5 miles from the highway and is bounded by the
McCloud River, private property, and major Forest roads. The large
landscape selected encompasses both complex natural forest stands that
retain more spatial heterogeneity combined with simplified forest
stands that are typically homogeneous in structure and include uniform
stands of small and medium-sized trees within plantations. Using
logical landscape boundaries, including the river, private property,
roads, and other restored landscapes (Algoma Vegetation Management
Project) fosters restoration of resilient forest structures, patterns,
and disturbance regimes which are lacking.
The legal location is: Township 39 North, Range 1 West, Sections 2-
10, 17-18; Township 39 North, Range 2 West, Sections 1-3, 12; Township
40 North, Range 1 West, Sections 27, 28, 31-34; Township 40 North,
Range 2 West, Sections 34-36; Township 40 North, Range 3 West, Sections
32-33; Township 40 North, Range 4 West, Sections 22-26, 34, Mt. Diablo
Meridian. Elevations range from 3,200 to 4,400 feet.
Project treatments include thinning along the Highway 89 corridor,
thinning in plantations and in natural forest stands throughout the
13,514 acres, hazard tree removal, prescribed burning, Forest road
management, and developing a helispot.
DATES: Comments concerning this scope of the analysis must be received
by October 15, 2015. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected in December, 2015 and the final environmental impact statement
is expected in May 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Carolyn Napper, District Ranger,
Shasta-McCloud Management Unit, 204 W. Alma St., Mt. Shasta, California
96067, Attn. Heather McRae. Comments may also be sent via email to:
comments-pacificsw-shasta-trinity-mtshasta-mccloud@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to (530) 926-5120.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather McRae, Fuels Specialist, at
(530) 964-3770 or hmcrae@fs.fed.us, or Ann Glubczynski, Natural
Resource Planner, at (530) 964-3717 or aglubczynski@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The project purpose and need for action is
generated by looking at the difference between the existing conditions
and the desired conditions [as identified in the Shasta-Trinity
National Forest Land Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan)] in the
project area.
Highway 89 Corridor
Existing Conditions: The Highway 89 corridor is defined as the area
that extends up to 275 feet out from the edge of the pavement on both
sides of the two-lane highway. This corridor is composed of three
sections between Interstate 5 (I-5) and Cattle Camp (Forest roads 43N19
and 40N44), for a total of 10.2 miles. The California Department of
Transportation (CalTrans) right of way (ROW) along the highway varies
from 80 to 200 feet from the roadway centerline through the project
area.
The vegetation along portions of the Highway 89 corridor includes
tall, dense forest stands that are close to the road shoulder and cast
shadows on the pavement. During the winter months, the shade on the
roadway keeps snow and ice from melting for up to several weeks
following a storm. Trees immediately adjacent to the highway with
overhanging branches can drop snow loads onto the highway and passing
vehicles. These branches collect snow, until the snow becomes too
heavy, and drops onto the roadway. Snow from overhanging branches has
been known to hit the windshields of vehicles as it falls, even
breaking some windshields. In many areas, the trees and brush are very
dense, growing within the ROW, which makes snow removal from the paved
traffic lanes difficult.
During the entire year, vegetation along the highway also limits
visibility for drivers to see wildlife moving from the forest onto the
highway. Numerous animal and vehicle collisions have occurred along the
highway in the project area, because drivers are not able to see
animals entering the roadway until they are so close that it is
difficult to stop or even slow down.
Dense vegetation, tree mortality, and large amounts of dead
vegetation and debris along Highway 89 have increased the likelihood
that a fire starting or burning along the highway could spread quickly
to threaten surrounding forests and communities, or allow for a fire to
cross the highway, and be difficult to control during dry summer
conditions. Highway 89 also serves as an evacuation route for residents
to leave and emergency personnel to access the area.
Desired Future Conditions: Sunlight is able to reach the Highway 89
road surface during winter months, enabling snow and ice to melt from
the roadway more quickly. There are fewer trees with branches hanging
over Highway 89.
Drivers along Highway 89 have adequate sight distance and an open
view of wildlife entering the roadway to respond as necessary.
Sufficient gaps in vegetation exist along Highway 89 to allow for
efficient snow removal during heavy snowfalls.
Vegetation conditions and predicted fire behavior along Highway 89
are such that a wildfire during summer months is less likely to spread
along or across the highway, is less likely to threaten surrounding
forests and communities, and would not limit access for firefighters,
or egress for citizens.
Forest Roads, Powerline Corridors and Helispot
Existing Conditions: There are many Forest roads within the project
area. The conditions of these roads vary, from
[[Page 55324]]
well maintained to nearly undrivable. Brush and trees encroach on some
roadways making them undrivable or difficult to drive on and therefore
unsafe for users. Many Forest roads are used frequently by Forest
visitors to access areas where they recreate, or for recreation
activities such as biking, horse-back riding, or driving off highway
vehicles (OHVs). Some of these roads have reduced access for
recreational opportunities due to their poor condition or being
overgrown.
Some roads that are open are not heavily used, nor are they needed
for resource management activities. There are many user-created routes
in the project area that are not part of the Forest transportation
system (unauthorized routes) and not needed for resource management
activities. But several Forest Transportation System roads and one
unauthorized route in the project area that are currently closed or
inaccessible do provide critical access for resource management
activities.
Powerlines crossing through the project area are maintained by the
power companies, who currently remove vegetation within the power line
corridor ROW. However, in some areas, such as near the community of
Mount Shasta, dense forest stands on NFS lands are growing right up to
the powerline corridors. The safety of firefighters responding to a
fire near these powerlines is at risk. There is no break in the
vegetation sufficient to safely put firefighters near the powerlines
during a wildfire to protect them.
There is an existing helispot located behind the Ash Creek Guard
Station where trees are obstructing the take-off and landing paths for
helicopters. These trees are part of a seed orchard of specially bred
trees. Cutting these trees would result in the loss of valuable genetic
research. The effectiveness of the helispot is increasingly hazardous
due to the height of adjacent trees, and we expect that within 10 years
the helispot will no longer be usable. There is currently no other
suitable landing spot for helicopters in the general vicinity.
Desired Future Conditions: Roads on the Forest transportation
system that are needed for current and future resource management or
recreation access have been maintained to provide safe access for
forest management and recreation activities, including: OHV riding,
horseback riding, and biking (activities the public has indicated are
important to them). Forest transportation system roads used for Forest
resource management are closed when not in use. Unauthorized routes
that do not meet management needs are decommissioned and become
revegetated. Forest system roads and trails that access rivers and
streams for water-oriented recreation activities are improved, and
roads and trails to hunting, fishing and wildlife viewing areas are
maintained at an appropriate maintenance level.
Vegetation on both sides of the powerline ROW is managed to reduce
potential impacts during wildfire. Overstory, ladder, and surface fuels
would be reduced such that the potential for crown fire during summer
conditions is unlikely. Anticipated fire behavior during summer
conditions is such that firefighters can safely manage a fire in the
vicinity of the powerlines.
A new helispot is located east of McCloud, with sufficient
clearance to allow a medical evacuation (medevac) helicopter to land
and transport a patient. This helispot is also available to support
fire operations.
Developed Recreation Areas
Existing Conditions: Developed recreation areas within the project
boundary include those within the McCloud River Loop area,
specifically: Fowlers, Cattle Camp and Camp 4 Campgrounds, Lower,
Middle, and Upper Falls picnic areas, Lakin Dam and Cattle Camp
Swimming Hole day use sites, the McCloud River Trail, and the Vista
Point along Highway 89.
Many of the forest stands in the recreation areas are overly dense
and at risk of density-related mortality. Evidence of root disease and
insect damage has been observed, and high fuel loading from mortality
is present throughout the area, increasing the likelihood of
undesirable effects in the event of a wildfire.
In the Cattle Camp Campground, there has been an increase in tree
mortality over the past five years. Within the developed campgrounds
and other recreation sites in the McCloud River corridor, hazard trees
continue to be a concern for public safety. Excessive hazardous fuel
accumulations can increase the potential for intense wildfires.
Vegetation is blocking views of the McCloud River from many of the
developed recreation sites such as Fowlers Campground and views of
Mount Shasta from the Vista Point.
Desired Future Conditions: Hazardous fuels are reduced to the
standards under the Forest Plan, allowing fire managers to effectively
protect life, property, and natural resources during a wildfire. Hazard
trees in developed recreation sites, along trails, and in campgrounds
are removed for forest health and public safety. Forest stands within
and surrounding campgrounds are healthy. Opportunities exist to view
the McCloud River within the developed recreation sites and trails, and
to view Mount Shasta from the Vista Point on Highway 89.
Wildland Urban Interface Defense Zones (Defined as Areas Up to \1/4\
Mile From Structures)
Existing Conditions: Fuels have been reduced in a portion of the
Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) in recent years around the communities
of McCloud and Mount Shasta. However, there are numerous forest stands
and brushy areas where fuels have not been reduced. Some of the treated
stands are still in a condition that could sustain a wildfire with
potential impacts to homes and private property, especially in the WUI
defense zones near Mount Shasta and on Snowman's Hill.
Desired Future Conditions: In the WUI defense zones around the
community of Mt. Shasta and Snowman's Hill, fuel loading has been
managed and reduced to the Forest Plan standards. Vegetation is managed
to achieve 4-foot flame lengths or less during 97th percentile weather
conditions. There is sufficient ingress/egress clearance and limited
chances of crown fire.
Forest Ecosystem Health
Existing Conditions: The project area is a combination of
plantations and natural (non-plantation) forest stands. The primarily
ponderosa pine plantations range in age from less than 10 years to over
70 years. Some of the plantations have had recent treatments (brush
mastication, thinning, pruning). Others have not and are overstocked,
with interlocking tree crowns and decadent woody shrubs, making them
vulnerable to mortality from insects and fire. Mortality has occurred
within some of the plantations, resulting in pockets of dead trees. The
plantations lack age, structure, and species diversity, and some were
subject to windrowing (a site preparation method which resulted in
piles of topsoil) and mechanical planting in the past.
Most of the natural forest stands are overly dense and at risk of
density-related mortality. Mortality pockets are starting to occur
across the project area. Root diseases, such as black stain and
Heterobasidion, along with evidence of insect damage, have been
observed in many locations. Dense and dying knobcone pine stands are
far outside of their natural range of variation both in overall numbers
as well as percent composition and are creating unnaturally large fuel
loads.
[[Page 55325]]
Windrows were created in several plantations prior to planting as a
way to remove competing vegetation. Windrowing reduced overall soil
productivity by scalping and piling nutrient rich topsoil, which
displaced nutrients and soil organic matter in the piles and left
poorer quality subsoil exposed for tree planting.
Areas dominated by bitterbrush, individual black oak trees, and
stands of aspen and oak (important for vegetative diversity and
wildlife habitat) are being encroached on by conifers, which are
shading out these shrubs/trees. Due to a lack of disturbance, forest
stands have followed a process of succession in which conifers grow
taller than aspen and oak, blocking the sunlight these species need.
Conifers are competing for soil nutrients and water with the other tree
and shrub species. Aspen stands are declining at a rapid rate due to
past management such as fire suppression, timber management (removing
aspen and planting conifers), livestock grazing and site conversion.
Bitterbrush stands are mostly even-aged and decadent with limited
regeneration or new growth, and there are encroaching conifers at the
edges of and within the bitterbrush stands.
Some Riparian Reserve areas located within the McCloud River
corridor (inner gorge) contain dense pockets of young conifers
encroaching on the riparian vegetation as well as dead and dying trees.
Some of these areas are adjacent to trails, such as the McCloud River
Trail, and recreation sites.
Effective fire suppression in the last century has greatly reduced
the total area burned when compared to pre-historic levels.
Approximately 73% of the project area historically experienced a high
frequency (0-35 year return interval), low to mixed severity fire
regime. Approximately 6% of the project area historically experienced a
high frequency (0-35 year return interval), high severity fire regime,
while 6% of the project area evolved under a low frequency (35-100
year) high severity fire regime (non-burnable area accounts for the
remaining 15%).
Based on the historic fire return intervals and fire history data,
the project area is outside the historical range for fire occurrence.
Approximately 80% of the project area is designated as a high departure
from the historical fire return interval range. These areas have missed
multiple fire return intervals. The remaining 4% of burnable area is at
a moderate departure, missing one or more return intervals. This
departure has resulted in changes to vegetation characteristics
(species composition, structural stages, stand age, canopy closure, and
mosaic pattern); fuel composition; fire frequency, severity, and
pattern; and insect and disease activity. The risk of losing key
ecosystem components is high.
Desired Future Conditions: Plantations with trees primarily 10
inches diameter at breast height (dbh) or greater have a more multi-
aged structure with variable sizes and spacing, and plantations with
trees primarily less than 10 inches dbh are moving toward stands with
larger sized trees. Natural stands have densities at levels that
improve and protect forest health and vigor. The stands have structural
diversity with varied species, multiple canopy layers, other types of
vegetation, and appropriate levels of coarse woody debris and snags.
Plantations and natural stands are resilient to epidemic insect or
disease attack. Knobcone pine dominated stands more closely resemble
their historic conditions of other species such as ponderosa pine,
incense cedar and white fir mixed in with the knobcone.
In plantations with windrows, the windrows have been respread,
redistributing the topsoil and nutrients throughout the plantation.
Overall soil quality and productivity are improved in the plantations
providing more nutrients to the trees.
Hardwoods, especially oaks and aspen, remain a healthy and vigorous
component of forest stands where they are naturally located. In
hardwood-dominated stands, there are fewer conifers competing for
resources (sunlight, nutrients, water) with the hardwoods. Bitterbrush
stands have a mix of age and condition classes and also have limited
competition from conifers. In riparian areas, the species composition
and structural diversity of the native vegetation maintain a healthy
riparian ecosystem, without excess competition for resources from
conifers.
All stands and vegetation types experience fires at intervals that
are historic to the area, have appropriate coarse woody debris and snag
levels, but do not have excess fuel loads. Wildfires that occur within
the project area during dry summer conditions are beneficial to the
ecosystem, as occurred historically.
Purpose and Need
For the Highway 89 corridor, there is a need to:
(1) Cut vegetation throughout the highway corridor, so that the
forest canopy is more open, allowing increased winter sunlight on the
roadway and faster melting of snow and ice on the pavement.
(2) Manage vegetation along the highway for increased driver sight
distance to reduce the risk of vehicle-wildlife collisions.
(3) Remove vegetation along the road shoulders for space to place
plowed/blown snow during storms.
(4) Reduce fuels along Highway 89 to allow for a more effective
fire response during summer conditions.
For Forest roads, powerline corridors and helispot facilities,
there is a need:
(1) To ensure that roads needed for Forest resource management are
maintained or repaired to meet Forest standards and closed when not in
use. Roads needed fror recreation access are maintained and repaired to
meet Forest standards and public safety needs. Roads not needed for
Forest management or recreation access are decommissioned. Roads are
added or removed from the Forest transportation system as appropriate.
(2) For a helispot east of McCloud to facilitate a medical
evacuation and an appropriate fire management response.
(3) To reduce hazardous fuels levels (surface fuel loadings, ladder
fuels, and vegetation densities) along powerlines, to increase
firefighter safety during a wildfire.
For developed recreation areas, there is a need to:
(1) Increase visitor safety from hazard trees and the risk of
wildfires, including along the McCloud River Trail, and improve access
within and surrounding the developed recreation sites.
(2) Improve the views throughout the project area, including Mt.
Shasta, the McCloud River, and the natural landscape.
For the WUI defense zones, there is a need to:
(1) Reduce hazardous fuel levels (surface fuel loadings, ladder
fuels, and vegetation densities) within the defense zones to achieve 4-
foot flame lengths or less during 97th percentile weather conditions.
For forest and ecosystem health, there is a need to:
(1) Increase the diversity of species composition, age, and
structure in plantations and natural forest stands.
(2) Increase resilience to fire, insects and disease in all stands.
(3) Reduce competition by conifers in hardwood stands, bitterbrush
areas, and riparian vegetation to ensure their growth and vigor.
(4) Respread existing windrowed topsoil in several plantations to
redistribute soil nutrients and organic matter and improve overall soil
productivity.
(5) Restore the natural role of fire in the ecosystem to facilitate
vegetative and other fire-related processes.
[[Page 55326]]
Proposed Alternative 3
The project area was divided into treatment areas based on
vegetation type, use, and areas with special conditions. Activities
include Forest road management, and construction of a new helispot for
medical air evacuation and firefighting support. Silviculture
treatments such as tree thinning, sanitation thinning and hazard tree
removal, along with fuels treatments such as underburning, hand or
machine piling, and mastication will be implemented to improve
resilience and health in forest stands, and improve safety along the
Highway 89 corridor, in WUI defense zones and in developed recreation
areas.
A complete description of alternative 3, including resource
protection measures and treatment maps, can be found in the Highway 89
Safety Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project Scoping
Document on the Shasta-Trinity National Forest Web site at https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=43770.
In summary, to meet the purpose and need the following treatments
have been identified (all acreages and miles are approximate, some
treatments will overlap, occurring in the same areas).
Thinning (variable density across all diameter classes, including
understory vegetation) of trees will be implemented throughout the
project area to reduce relative stand densities and meet other
objectives. In some areas thinning will create small gaps/openings in
the canopy (such as the WUI defense zone). In other areas, clumps of
trees with wildlife sheltering structure will be retained.
Sanitation (removing dead and dying clumps of trees) will be
implemented in areas of disease, insect damage, and ongoing mortality.
Group selections will be installed in larger areas of mortality to try
and slow rate of progression.
Hazard tree removal will occur throughout the project area.
Encroaching conifers will be removed to release riparian vegetation
along the McCloud River Corridor and from bitterbrush fields.
These treatments will occur in:
3,376 acres of plantations with trees 10 inches or
greater,
617 acres of plantations with trees less than 10 inches
dbh,
1,241 acres of mixed conifer natural stands,
3,794 acres of pine dominated natural stands,
653 acres of knobcone pine dominated stands,
212 acres of the McCloud River Corridor area,
212 acres of the Big Canyon Creek area,
61 acres of bitterbrush fields, and
16 acres of black oak stands.
Fuels treatments will include mastication, machine and hand piling
and pile burning, and thinning for fuel reduction. The entire project
area (with the exception of specific sensitive areas) will be
underburned.
The treatments will yield renewable forest by-products of both
sawtimber (logs) and biomass (chips), firewood, and special forest
products. Treatments will be accomplished through a variety of methods
including service contacts, force account, commercial timber harvest,
and stewardship contracts.
In addition to vegetation treatments, a 550-foot x 550-foot
helispot will be constructed across the highway from the Ash Creek Work
Station (total area of approximately 14 acres). Forest road management
activities will include 78 miles of road maintenance, 2.8 miles of
reconstruction, 4 miles of new temporary road construction, 7.9 miles
road/route decommissioning, 11.25 miles of road closures, 3 miles of
road openings, and 0.25 miles of road (access to the new helispot)
added to the Forest Transportation System.
Highway 89 is designated as a Forest Service Scenic Byway. Visual
quality objectives for the highway corridor through National Forest
land call for retention, meaning human activities are not visually
evident to the casual forest visitor. Trees will be removed along the
highway in view of the roadway and the resulting changes in vegetation
will be visually evident. Depending on the results of the scenery
analysis, a Forest Plan amendment may be required for the project
activities along the Highway 89 corridor.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide whether to implement the proposed
alternative 3, take an alternative action that meets the purpose and
need, or take no action.
Permits or Licenses Required
A permit would be required from the State of California prior to
burning piles. The appropriate regulatory agencies will be consulted
regarding national or state required permits associated with roads used
during project implementation. All rquired permits will be obtained
prior to implementation.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.
Early in the project development process, meetings were held with
local stakeholders, including representatives from the California
Department of Transportation, the local timber industry and American
Forest Resources Council, local fire safe and watershed councils,
environmental and citizens' organizations, and the Pit River Tribe. It
was anticipated at that time that an environmental assessment would be
written for the project.
The project was originally scoped in June, 2014. The project was
posted on the Forest Schedule of Proposed Actions (SOPA) On June 30,
2014. The Legal Notice was published in the newspaper of record (Record
Searchlight, Redding, California) on June 30, 2014. A notice was also
published in the Mount Shasta Herald (Mount Shasta, California). A
scoping letter was mailed or emailed to 168 individuals, organizations,
and government agencies. The scoping document and was posted to the
Shasta-Trinity National Forest Web site. The scoping period was 30
days. Comments were received from nine individuals, organizations, and
agencies.
In addition to the written request for comments, the scoping phase
included two public meetings and field trips for interested members of
the public and other government agencies. A public meeting/field trip
was held on October 4, 2014 with 11 attendees. A field trip with
representatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was held on
October 31, 2014. The comments from the scoping period and public
meetings/field trips have become part of the Highway 89 Safety
Enhancement and Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project record, and were
considered when developing this new alternative (alternative 3), which
is referred to as alternative 3 in this notice of intent.
Based on the public involvement since scoping as well as new
information, the line officer has chosen to evaluate and document
project effects on the environment in an environmental impact
statement.
For the scoping period initiated by this notice of intent, it is
important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of the
environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided
prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate
the reviewer's concerns and
[[Page 55327]]
contentions. Comments submitted during the first scoping period will
continue to be considered and need not be resubmitted. This project
would implement the Forest Plan and is subject to 36 CFR 218 subparts A
and B. All persons who provided comment in past designated comment
periods associated with this project will have standing to object on
comment issues previously provided however, those interested in the
project are encouraged to review the scoping package and provide
comments. Please note that to object per 36 CFR 218, a commenter must
have provided specific written comments regarding the proposed project
or activity during scoping or another designated opportunity for public
comment (in other words objection issues must be based on previously
submitted specific written comments except for issues that arose after
the opportunities for comment). Please refer to 36 CFR 218.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however anonymous comments will not provide
the Agency with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent
environmental documents and may preclude their ability to object.
Dated: September 8, 2015.
David R. Myers,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2015-23157 Filed 9-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P