Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations, 55387-55395 [2015-23083]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance available on the NRC’s public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the documents are submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the document to the NRC’s Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/ petition to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document via the E-Filing system. A person filing electronically using the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System Help Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the NRC’s public Web site at https:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call to 1–866–672–7640. The NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) first class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in NRC’s electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at https:// ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. However, in some instances, a request to intervene will require including information on local residence in order to demonstrate a proximity assertion of interest in the proceeding. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice. Requests for hearing, petitions for leave to intervene, and motions for leave to file new or amended contentions that are filed after the 60-day deadline will not be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(iii). For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment, dated June 17, 2015, and supplemented by letters dated July 14, August 28, and September 3, 2015, in ADAMS under ADAMS Accession Nos. ML15170A474, ML15197A357, ML15243A044, and ML15246A638. Attorney for licensee: General Counsel, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 6A West Tower, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902. NRC Branch Chief: Jessie F. Quichocho. PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55387 Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of September 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Jeanne A. Dion, Project Manager, Watts Bar Special Projects Branch, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2015–23085 Filed 9–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2015–0219] Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Biweekly notice. AGENCY: Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is publishing this regular biweekly notice. The Act requires the Commission to publish notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to be issued, and grants the Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or combined license, as applicable, upon a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a hearing from any person. This biweekly notice includes all notices of amendments issued, or proposed to be issued from August 18 to August 31, 2015. The last biweekly notice was published on September 1, 2015. DATES: Comments must be filed by October 15, 2015. A request for a hearing must be filed by November 16, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods (unless this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject): • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0219. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 55388 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ‘‘Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mable Henderson, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–3760, email: Mable.Henderson@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments II. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses and Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination The Commission has made a proposed determination that the following amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration. Under the Commission’s regulations in § 50.92 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The basis for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown below. The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination. Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example in derating or shutdown of the facility. Should the Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015– 0219 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this action by any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0219. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC–2015– 0219, facility name, unit number(s), application date, and subject in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at https:// www.regulations.gov as well as entering VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance. Should the Commission make a final No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, any hearing will take place after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very infrequently. A. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To Intervene Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any person(s) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a request for a hearing and a petition to intervene with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license or combined license. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission’s ‘‘Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 2. Interested person(s) should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is available at the NRC’s PDR, located at One White Flint North, Room O1–F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. The NRC’s regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on the NRC’s Web site at https:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or a presiding officer designated by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of a hearing or an appropriate order. As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following general requirements: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of the requestor’s/petitioner’s right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the requestor’s/petitioner’s property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the proceeding on the requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The petition must also identify the specific E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices contentions which the requestor/ petitioner seeks to have litigated at the proceeding. Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the requestor/petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the contention and on which the requestor/petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The requestor/petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the requestor/petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion. The petition must include sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the amendment under consideration. The contention must be one which, if proven, would entitle the requestor/ petitioner to relief. A requestor/ petitioner who fails to satisfy these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party. Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing. If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If the final determination is that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a significant hazards consideration, then any hearing held would take place before the issuance of any amendment unless the Commission finds an imminent danger to the health or safety of the public, in which case it will issue an appropriate order or rule under 10 CFR part 2. B. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 to the submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the NRC’s E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in accordance with the procedures described below. To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at 301–415–1677, to request (1) a digital identification (ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a request or petition for hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic docket. Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on the NRC’s public Web site at https:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ getting-started.html. System requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in the NRC’s ‘‘Guidance for Electronic Submission,’’ which is available on the agency’s public Web site at https:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Participants may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should note that the NRC’s E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance in using unlisted software. If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the document using the NRC’s online, Web-based submission form. In order to serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System, users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC’s Web PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55389 site. Further information on the Webbased submission form, including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on the NRC’s public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance available on the NRC’s public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the documents are submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the document to the NRC’s Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/ petition to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document via the E-Filing system. A person filing electronically using the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System Help Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the NRC’s public Web site at https:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 55390 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRC’s electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at https:// ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. However, in some instances, a request to intervene will require including information on local residence in order to demonstrate a proximity assertion of interest in the proceeding. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice. Requests for hearing, petitions for leave to intervene, and motions for leave to file new or amended contentions that are filed after the 60-day deadline will not be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(iii). For further details with respect to these license amendment applications, see the application for amendment which is available for public inspection in ADAMS and at the NRC’s PDR. For additional direction on accessing information related to this document, see the ‘‘Obtaining Information and VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 Submitting Comments’’ section of this document. Florida Power & Light Company, et al., Docket No. 50–335, St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1, St. Lucie County, Florida Date of amendment request: July 15, 2015. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15198A029. Description of amendment request: The amendment would revise Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirements for snubbers to conform to revisions to the Snubber Testing Program. Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below: 1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed changes would revise SR [Surveillance Requirement] 4.7.10 to conform the TS to the revised surveillance program for snubbers. Snubber examination, testing and service life monitoring will continue to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g). Snubber examination, testing and service life monitoring is not an initiator of any accident previously evaluated. Therefore, the probability of an accident previously evaluated is not significantly increased. Snubbers will continue to be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of a program for examination, testing and service life monitoring in compliance with 10 CFR 50.55a or authorized alternatives. The proposed change does not adversely affect plant operations, design functions or analyses that verify the capability of systems, structures, and components to perform their design functions therefore, the consequences of accidents previously evaluated are not significantly increased. Therefore, it is concluded that this change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed changes do not involve any physical alteration of plant equipment. The proposed changes do PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 not alter the method by which any safety-related system performs its function. As such, no new or different types of equipment will be installed, and the basic operation of installed equipment is unchanged. The methods governing plant operation and testing remain consistent with current safety analysis assumptions. Therefore, it is concluded that this change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated. 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? Response: No. The proposed changes ensure snubber examination, testing and service life monitoring will continue to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g). Snubbers will continue to be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of a program for examination, testing and service life monitoring in compliance with 10 CFR 50.55a or authorized alternatives. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee’s analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Attorney for licensee: William S. Blair, Managing Attorney—Nuclear, Florida Power & Light, 700 Universe Blvd., MS LAW/JB, Juno Beach, Florida 33408–0420. NRC Branch Chief: Shana R. Helton. III. Previously Published Notices of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing The following notices were previously published as separate individual notices. The notice content was the same as above. They were published as individual notices either because time did not allow the Commission to wait for this biweekly notice or because the action involved exigent circumstances. They are repeated here because the biweekly notice lists all amendments issued or proposed to be issued involving no significant hazards consideration. For details, see the individual notice in the Federal Register on the day and E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices page cited. This notice does not extend the notice period of the original notice. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50–369 and 50–370, McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Mecklenburg Counties, North Carolina Date of amendment request: June 30, 2015. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15191A025. Brief description of amendment request: The proposed amendment would allow a temporary extension of selected Technical Specification required Completion Times to support repair activities associated with the Nuclear Service Water System. Date of publication of individual notice in Federal Register: August 20, 2015 (80 FR 50663). Expiration date of individual notice: September 19, 2015 (public comments) and October 19, 2015 (hearing requests). IV. Notice of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses During the period since publication of the last biweekly notice, the Commission has issued the following amendments. The Commission has determined for each of these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission’s rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment. A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal Register as indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, the Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these amendments. If the Commission has prepared an environmental assessment under the special circumstances provision in 10 CFR 51.22(b) and has made a determination based on that assessment, it is so indicated. For further details with respect to the action see (1) the applications for amendment, (2) the amendment, and (3) VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 the Commission’s related letter, Safety Evaluation and/or Environmental Assessment as indicated. All of these items can be accessed as described in the ‘‘Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments’’ section of this document. Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Docket No. 50–336, Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 2 (MPS2), New London County, Connecticut Date of amendment request: October 31, 2014. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the MPS2 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) to allow for the use of the encoded ultrasonic examination technique in lieu of the FSAR committed additional radiography examination for certain piping welds fabricated to American National Standards Institute B31.1.0. Specifically, the legend notes of MPS2 FSAR Figure 9.0.3, ‘‘General Piping and Instrumentation Diagram’’ were revised to replace the references to ‘‘radiography’’ with ‘‘volumetric examination.’’ Date of issuance: August 26, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days from the date of issuance. Amendment No.: 322. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15225A008; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–65: Amendment revised the Renewed Operating License. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 9, 2015 (80 FR 32626). The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 26, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Docket No. 50–423, Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 (MPS3), New London County, Connecticut Date of amendment request: October 14, 2014, as supplemented by letter dated August 27, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the MPS3 Technical Specification (TS) surveillance requirement (SR) 4.4.4.2 to remove the requirement to perform the surveillance for a pressurizer power-operated relief valve block valve that is being maintained closed in accordance with TS 3.4.4 Action a. Date of issuance: August 28, 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55391 Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days from the date of issuance. Amendment No.: 264. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15225A010; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF–49: Amendment revised the Renewed Operating License and TSs. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: April 28, 2015 (80 FR 23601). The supplemental letter dated August 27, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 28, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50–369 and 50–370, McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Date of application for amendments: March 23, 2015. Brief description of amendments: The amendments modify the definition of RATED THERMAL POWER and delete a footnote that allowed for staggered implementation of the previously approved Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate. Date of issuance: August 24, 2015. Effective date: This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days of issuance. Amendment Nos.: 280 and 260. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15174A173; documents related to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendments. Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–9 and NPF–17: Amendments revised the Facility Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 9, 2015 (80 FR 32627). The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 24, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 55392 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices Entergy Operations, Inc., System Energy Resources, Inc., South Mississippi Electric Power Association, and Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Docket No. 50–416, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Claiborne County, Mississippi Date of application for amendment: November 21, 2014, as supplemented by letter dated April 14, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1.2 of TS Section 2.1.1, ‘‘Reactor Core SLs [Safety Limits].’’ Specifically, the cycle-specific safety limit minimum critical power ratio values for Cycle 20 were revised in support of the Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus license amendment request. Date of issuance: August 18, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 180 days of issuance. Amendment No: 203. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15229A213; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Facility Operating License No. NPF– 29: The amendment revised the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 31, 2015 (80 FR 17087). The supplemental letter dated April 14, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Entergy Operations, Inc., System Energy Resources, Inc., South Mississippi Electric Power Association, and Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Docket No. 50–416, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (GGNS), Claiborne County, Mississippi Date of application for amendment: November 21, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated February 18, March 30, May 8, June 11, 2015 and August 10, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the GGNS Updated Final Safety Analysis Report from the use of two different fluence calculational methods to the use of a single 3D fluence methodology for 0 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 effective full power years through the end of extended operations. Date of issuance: August 18, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days of issuance. Amendment No: 204. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15229A218; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Facility Operating License No. NPF– 29: The amendment revised the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 31, 2015 (80 FR 17087). The supplemental letters dated March 30, May 8, June 11, 2015 and August 10, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: Yes. The comments received on Amendment No. 204 are addressed in the Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015. Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50– 382, Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (WF3), St. Charles Parish, Louisiana Date of amendment request: August 28, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated April 15, May 4, and June 18, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised Technical Specification 6.15, ‘‘Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program,’’ to allow for the extension of the 10-year frequency of the WF3 Type A or Integrated Leak Rate Test to 15 years on a permanent basis. Date of issuance: August 24, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 30 days from the date of issuance. Amendment No.: 244. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15217A143; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Facility Operating License No. NPF– 38: The amendment revised the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: December 9, 2014 (79 FR PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73109). The supplements dated April 15, May 4, and June 18, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 24, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Florida Power and Light Company, et al., Docket Nos. 50–335 and 50–389, St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, St. Lucie County, Florida Date of amendment request: August 26, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated January 14, February 6, and May 14, 2015. Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised Technical Specification 6.8.4.h, ‘‘Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program,’’ to allow extension of the Type A test (i.e., Integrated Leak Rate Test) to a 15-year frequency. Date of issuance: August 27, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of issuance. Amendment Nos.: 226 and 176. A publicly available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15195A655; documents related to these amendments are listed in the safety evaluation (SE) enclosed with the amendments. Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–67 and NPF–16: Amendments revised the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: January 20, 2015 (80 FR 2750). The supplemental letters dated January 14, February 6, and May 14, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in an SE dated August 27, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. A comment was received but it was not related to the amendment or to the proposed no significant hazards consideration determination. E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices Florida Power and Light Company, et al., Docket Nos. 50–335 and 50–389, St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, St. Lucie County, Florida Date of amendment request: August 7, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated February 20 and May 21, 2015. Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised the Technical Specifications (TSs) by adopting Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF–426, Revision 5, ‘‘Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3—RITSTF [RiskInformed TSTF] Initiatives 6b and 6c,’’ which is an NRC-approved change to the Standard TSs. The amendments provide an additional allowed outage time to restore an inoperable system for conditions under which existing TSs require a plant shutdown. Date of Issuance: August 31, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of issuance. Amendment Nos.: 227 and 177. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15191A403; documents related to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation (SE) enclosed with the amendments. Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–67 and NPF–16: Amendments revised the TSs. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 17, 2015 (80 FR 13908). The supplemental letters dated February 20 and May 21, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in an SE dated August 30, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Nebraska Public Power District, Docket No. 50–298, Cooper Nuclear Station, Nemaha County, Nebraska Date of amendment request: August 26, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated February 25 and July 13, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The proposed amendment revised the CNS Technical Specifications (TSs) by deleting Option b from TS Surveillance Requirement 3.5.2.1. Option b allows use of Condensate Storage Tank (CST) A as an alternative source of makeup water to the reactor pressure vessel during MODE 4 and MODE 5, but CST A is not qualified to Seismic Category I. Date of issuance: August 27, 2015. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of issuance. Amendment No.: 252. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15216A259; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–46: Amendment revised the Facility Operating License and TSs. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: December 23, 2014 (79 FR 77047). The supplemental letters dated February 25 and July 13, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 27, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Docket No. 50–331, Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC), Linn County, Iowa Date of amendment request: August 28, 2014. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the DAEC Renewed Facility Operating License (FOL) to change the scheduled completion date for Milestone 8 of the Cyber Security Plan (CSP) Implementation Schedule. The amendment modified paragraph 2.C.(5) of the Renewed FOL No. DPR– 49, which provides a license condition to require the licensee, to fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the NRC-approved CSP. Date of issuance: August 18, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days. Amendment No.: 291. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15169A261; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–49: The amendment revised the renewed FOL. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: January 6, 2015 (80 FR 535). The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55393 Northern States Power Company— Minnesota, Docket Nos. 50–282 and 50– 306, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Goodhue County, Minnesota Date of amendment requests: August 21, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2015, and July 31, 2015. Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised the licensing basis analysis for a waste gas decay tank rupture at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. Date of issuance: August 26, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days of issuance. Amendment Nos.: Unit 1—215; Unit 2—203. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15229A176; documents related to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendments. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: October 28, 2014 (79 FR 64227). The supplements dated February 9, 2015, and July 31, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 26, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Docket Nos. 50–275 and 50–323, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, California Date of application for amendments: July 28, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated May 7, 2015 and August 6, 2015. Brief description of amendments: The amendments modified the technical specifications to risk-inform requirements regarding selected Required Action End States. The proposed changes to the Required Action End States are described in Table 1 of the Enclosure to the licensee’s letter dated July 28, 2014. The changes are consistent with Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF–432, Revision 1, ‘‘Change in Technical Specifications End States (WCAP– 16294)’’ (ADAMS Accession No. ML103430249). Date of issuance: August 27, 2015. E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 55394 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices Effective date: As of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 120 days from the date of issuance. Amendment Nos.: Unit 1—219; Unit 2—221. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15204A222; documents related to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendments. Facility Operating License Nos. DPR– 80 and DPR–82: The amendments revised the Facility Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: September 30, 2014 (79 FR 58823). The supplemental letters dated May 7 and August 6, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 27, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, South Carolina Public Service Authority, Docket No. 50–395, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Fairfield County, South Carolina Date of amendment request: December 19, 2014. Date of issuance: August 18, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment approves expansion of the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) boundary, a revision to the Evacuation Time Estimates analysis, and a revision to the Alert and Notification System design reports to encompass the expanded EPZ boundary. Effective date: As of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days of issuance. Amendment No.: 201. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15170A087; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF–12: Amendment revised the Renewed Facility Operating License. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: February 3, 2015 (80 FR 5803). The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Docket No. 50–424, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Unit 1, Burke County, Georgia Date of application for amendments: June 4, 2015, as supplemented July 22 and July 31, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revises the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 1, Technical Specification (TS) Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.5.2, ‘‘ECCS Operating’’, such that with the ‘1A’ Residual Heat Removal (RHR) pump inoperable for a motor replacement, the Completion Time of Condition 3.5.2.A changes from 72 hours to 7 days. This TS change would be in effect only for the ‘1A’ RHR pump for the remainder of Cycle 19. Date of issuance: August 19, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days from the date of issuance. Amendment No.: 176. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15209A874. Documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License Nos NPF–68: Amendment revised the Renewed Facility Operating License. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 23, 2015 (80 FR 35983). The supplemental letters dated July 22 and July 31, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposal no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 19, 2015. The Commission has made a final determination that no significant hazards consideration is involved for the proposed amendment, as discussed in the aforementioned Safety Evaluation. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. STP Nuclear Operating Company, Docket Nos. 50–498 and 50–499, South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, Matagorda County, Texas Date of amendment request: May 15, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated July 10, 2014, February 11 and 26, and July 1, 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Brief description of amendments: The amendments support a conversion from the current emergency action level scheme to a scheme based on Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99–01, Revision 6, ‘‘Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors,’’ dated November 2012. Date of issuance: August 20, 2015. Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 180 days of issuance. Amendment Nos.: Unit 1—206; Unit 2—194. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15201A195; documents related to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendments. Facility Operating License Nos. NPF– 76 and NPF–80: The amendments authorize revisions to the Emergency Action Level Technical Bases Document. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: October 28, 2014 (79 FR 64229). The supplemental letters dated February 11 and 26, and July 1, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 20, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, Docket No. 50–482, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Coffey County, Kansas Date of amendment request: February 26, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated December 8, 2014, and January 21 and July 15, 2015. Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised Technical Specification 5.6.5, ‘‘CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR),’’ to incorporate Westinghouse Electric Company LLC’s topical report WCAP– 16009–P–A, ‘‘Realistic Large-Break LOCA [Loss-of-Coolant Accident] Evaluation Methodology Using the Automated Statistical Treatment of Uncertainty Method (ASTRUM),’’ January 2005, to the list of analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits. Date of issuance: August 28, 2015. Effective date: Upon issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days of the date of issuance. E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Notices Amendment No.: 213. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15203A005; documents related to this amendment are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment. Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF–42. The amendment revised the Operating License and Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Register: September 9, 2014 (79 FR 53462). The supplemental letters dated December 8, 2014, January 21, and July 15, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff’s original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The Commission’s related evaluation of the amendment is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated August 28, 2015. No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of September 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Anne Boland, Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2015–23083 Filed 9–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ISE Mercury, LLC; Order Granting Application for a Conditional Exemption Pursuant to Section 36(a) of the Exchange Act From Certain Requirements of Rules 6a–1 and 6a–2 Under the Exchange Act September 9, 2015. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Introduction On September 29, 2014, ISE Mercury, LLC (‘‘Applicant’’) submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) an application on Form 1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) to register as a national securities exchange. In connection with this application, the Applicant, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0–12,1 has requested an exemption under Section 36(a)(1) of the Exchange Act 2 from certain requirements of 2 15 CFR 240.0–12. U.S.C. 78mm(a)(1). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Sep 14, 2015 II. Application for Conditional Exemption from Certain Requirements of Exchange Act Rules 6a–1 and 6a–2 A. Filing Requirements Under Exchange Act Rule 6a–1(a) Exchange Act Rule 6a–1(a) requires an applicant for registration as a national securities exchange to file an application with the Commission on Form 1. Exhibit C to Form 1 requires the applicant to provide certain information with respect to each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.4 For purposes of Form 1, an ‘‘affiliate’’ is ‘‘[a]ny person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is under common control with, or is controlled by, the national securities exchange . . . including any employees.’’ 5 Form 1 defines ‘‘control’’ as ‘‘[t]he power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies of a company, whether through ownership of securities, by contract, or otherwise . . . .’’ 6 Form 1 provides, further, that any person that directly or indirectly has the right to vote 25% or more of a class of voting securities, or has the power to sell or direct the sale of 25% or more of a class of voting securities, is presumed to control the entity.7 Exhibit D to Form 1 requires an applicant for registration as a national securities exchange to provide unconsolidated financial statements for 3 17 [Release No. 34–75867] 1 17 Exchange Act Rules 6a–1(a) and 6a–2 (‘‘Exemption Request’’).3 This order grants the Applicant’s request for exemptive relief, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, which are outlined below. Jkt 235001 CFR 240.6a–1(a) and 6a–2. See letter from Michael Simon, Secretary and General Counsel, ISE Mercury, LLC, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated June 26, 2015. 4 Specifically, Exhibit C requires the applicant to provide, for each subsidiary or affiliate, and for any entity with whom the applicant has a contractual or other agreement relating to the operation of an electronic trading system used to effect transactions on the exchange: (1) The name and address of the organization; (2) the form of organization; (3) the name of the state and statute citation under which it is organized, and the date of its incorporation in its present form; (4) a brief description of the nature and extent of the affiliation; (5) a brief description of the organization’s business or functions; (6) a copy of the organization’s constitution; (7) a copy of the organization’s articles of incorporation or association, including all amendments; (8) a copy of the organization’s by-laws or corresponding rules or instruments; (9) the name and title of the organization’s present officers, governors, members of all standing committees, or persons performing similar functions; and (10) an indication of whether the business or organization ceased to be associated with the applicant during the previous year, and a brief statement of the reasons for termination of the association. 5 Form 1 Instructions, Explanation of Terms, 17 CFR 249.1. 6 Id. 7 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55395 the latest fiscal year for each subsidiary or affiliate. Exhibit D requires the financial statements to include, at a minimum, a balance sheet and an income statement with such footnotes and other disclosures as are necessary to avoid rendering the financial statements misleading. Exhibit D provides, in addition, that if any affiliate or subsidiary of the applicant is required by another Commission rule to submit annual financial statements, a statement to that effect, with a citation to the other Commission rule, may be provided in lieu of the financial statements required in Exhibit D. A Form 1 application is not considered filed until all necessary information, including financial statements and other required documents, have been furnished in the proper form.8 B. Filing Requirements under Exchange Act Rule 6a–2 Exchange Act Rule 6a–2(a)(2) requires a national securities exchange to update the information provided in Exhibit C within 10 days of any action that causes the information provided in Exhibit C to become inaccurate or incomplete. In addition, Exchange Act Rule 6a–2(b)(1) requires a national securities exchange to file Exhibit D on or before June 30 of each year, and Exchange Act Rule 6a– 2(c) requires a national securities exchange to file Exhibit C every three years. C. Exemption Request On June 26, 2015, the Applicant requested that the Commission grant an exemption under Section 36 of the Exchange Act from the requirement under Exchange Act Rule 6a–1 to file the information requested of the Applicant in Exhibits C and D to Form 1 for the ‘‘Foreign Indirect Affiliates,’’ as defined below.9 In addition, the Applicant requested an exemption, subject to certain conditions, with respect to the Foreign Indirect Affiliates from the requirements under: (1) Exchange Act Rule 6a–2(a)(2) to amend Exhibit C within 10 days if the information in Exhibit C becomes inaccurate or incomplete; and (2) Exchange Act Rules 6a–2(b)(1) and (c) to 8 17 CFR 202.3(b)(2). See also 17 CFR 240.0–3(a). Defective Form 1 applications ‘‘may be returned with a request for correction or held until corrected before being accepted as a filing.’’ See 17 CFR 202.3(b)(2). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40760 (December 8, 1998), 63 FR 70844, 70881 (December 22, 1998) (‘‘Regulation ATS Adopting Release’’) at note 329 and accompanying text. 9 See Exemption Request, supra note 3. E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 178 (Tuesday, September 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55387-55395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2015-0219]


Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility 
Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant 
Hazards Considerations

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Biweekly notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 
1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(NRC) is publishing this regular biweekly notice. The Act requires the 
Commission to publish notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to 
be issued, and grants the Commission the authority to issue and make 
immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or combined 
license, as applicable, upon a determination by the Commission that 
such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, 
notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a 
hearing from any person.
    This biweekly notice includes all notices of amendments issued, or 
proposed to be issued from August 18 to August 31, 2015. The last 
biweekly notice was published on September 1, 2015.

DATES: Comments must be filed by October 15, 2015. A request for a 
hearing must be filed by November 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods 
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting 
comments on a specific subject):
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0219. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.

[[Page 55388]]

     Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, 
Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
DC 20555-0001.
    For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting 
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mable Henderson, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3760, email: Mable.Henderson@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments

A. Obtaining Information

    Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0219 when contacting the NRC 
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain 
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the 
following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0219.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available 
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

B. Submitting Comments

    Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0219, facility name, unit 
number(s), application date, and subject in your comment submission.
    The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact 
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your 
comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into 
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove 
identifying or contact information.
    If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons 
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to 
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be 
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should 
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to 
remove such information before making the comment submissions available 
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.

II. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility 
Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses and Proposed No Significant 
Hazards Consideration Determination

    The Commission has made a proposed determination that the following 
amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration. Under 
the Commission's regulations in Sec.  50.92 of Title 10 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), this means that operation of the facility 
in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a 
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated, or (2) create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or 
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The basis 
for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown 
below.
    The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
determination.
    Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The 
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment 
involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the 
Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-
day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day 
comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, 
for example in derating or shutdown of the facility. Should the 
Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment 
period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a 
notice of issuance. Should the Commission make a final No Significant 
Hazards Consideration Determination, any hearing will take place after 
issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will 
occur very infrequently.

A. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To Intervene

    Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any 
person(s) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a 
request for a hearing and a petition to intervene with respect to 
issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license or 
combined license. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Agency 
Rules of Practice and Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested 
person(s) should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is 
available at the NRC's PDR, located at One White Flint North, Room O1-
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. The 
NRC's regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on 
the NRC's Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is 
filed by the above date, the Commission or a presiding officer 
designated by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of 
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request 
and/or petition; and the Secretary or the Chief Administrative Judge of 
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of a hearing 
or an appropriate order.
    As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene 
shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
following general requirements: (1) The name, address, and telephone 
number of the requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of the 
requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the 
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the requestor's/petitioner's 
property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the 
possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the 
proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's interest. The petition must 
also identify the specific

[[Page 55389]]

contentions which the requestor/petitioner seeks to have litigated at 
the proceeding.
    Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue 
of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the 
requestor/petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for 
the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert 
opinion which support the contention and on which the requestor/
petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. 
The requestor/petitioner must also provide references to those specific 
sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the 
requestor/petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert 
opinion. The petition must include sufficient information to show that 
a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law 
or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of 
the amendment under consideration. The contention must be one which, if 
proven, would entitle the requestor/petitioner to relief. A requestor/
petitioner who fails to satisfy these requirements with respect to at 
least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
    Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
hearing.
    If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final 
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The 
final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If 
the final determination is that the amendment request involves no 
significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment 
request involves a significant hazards consideration, then any hearing 
held would take place before the issuance of any amendment unless the 
Commission finds an imminent danger to the health or safety of the 
public, in which case it will issue an appropriate order or rule under 
10 CFR part 2.

B. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)

    All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a 
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or 
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a 
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by 
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), 
must be filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; 
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit 
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some 
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not 
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in 
accordance with the procedures described below.
    To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the 
Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by 
telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) a digital identification (ID) 
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or 
representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal 
server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise 
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a request or 
petition for hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or 
its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID 
certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish 
an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the 
Secretary has not already established an electronic docket.
    Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is 
available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. System requirements for accessing 
the E-Submittal server are detailed in the NRC's ``Guidance for 
Electronic Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web 
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants 
may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but 
should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted 
software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer 
assistance in using unlisted software.
    If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC 
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the 
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to 
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System, 
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC's 
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form, 
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on 
the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
    Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a 
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for 
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in 
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance 
available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the 
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be 
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system 
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of 
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends 
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The 
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access 
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any 
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to 
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the 
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and 
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for 
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition 
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document 
via the E-Filing system.
    A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System 
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's public 
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to 
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-7640. The 
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., 
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
    Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not 
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in 
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing 
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper 
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail 
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: 
Rulemaking and

[[Page 55390]]

Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited 
delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One 
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, 
Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a 
document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all 
other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail 
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or 
expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the 
provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an 
exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or 
party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines 
that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no 
longer exists.
    Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the 
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at 
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the 
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to 
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, 
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC 
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. 
However, in some instances, a request to intervene will require 
including information on local residence in order to demonstrate a 
proximity assertion of interest in the proceeding. With respect to 
copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose 
of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use 
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted 
materials in their submission.
    Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60 
days from the date of publication of this notice. Requests for hearing, 
petitions for leave to intervene, and motions for leave to file new or 
amended contentions that are filed after the 60-day deadline will not 
be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the 
filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-(iii).
    For further details with respect to these license amendment 
applications, see the application for amendment which is available for 
public inspection in ADAMS and at the NRC's PDR. For additional 
direction on accessing information related to this document, see the 
``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' section of this 
document.

Florida Power & Light Company, et al., Docket No. 50-335, St. Lucie 
Plant, Unit No. 1, St. Lucie County, Florida

    Date of amendment request: July 15, 2015. A publicly-available 
version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15198A029.
    Description of amendment request: The amendment would revise 
Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirements for snubbers to 
conform to revisions to the Snubber Testing Program.
    Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration 
determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has 
provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards 
consideration, which is presented below:
    1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the 
probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed changes would revise SR [Surveillance Requirement] 
4.7.10 to conform the TS to the revised surveillance program for 
snubbers. Snubber examination, testing and service life monitoring will 
continue to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g).
    Snubber examination, testing and service life monitoring is not an 
initiator of any accident previously evaluated. Therefore, the 
probability of an accident previously evaluated is not significantly 
increased.
    Snubbers will continue to be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance 
of a program for examination, testing and service life monitoring in 
compliance with 10 CFR 50.55a or authorized alternatives. The proposed 
change does not adversely affect plant operations, design functions or 
analyses that verify the capability of systems, structures, and 
components to perform their design functions therefore, the 
consequences of accidents previously evaluated are not significantly 
increased.
    Therefore, it is concluded that this change does not involve a 
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated.
    2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed changes do not involve any physical alteration of 
plant equipment. The proposed changes do not alter the method by which 
any safety-related system performs its function. As such, no new or 
different types of equipment will be installed, and the basic operation 
of installed equipment is unchanged. The methods governing plant 
operation and testing remain consistent with current safety analysis 
assumptions.
    Therefore, it is concluded that this change does not create the 
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident 
previously evaluated.
    3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a 
margin of safety?
    Response: No.
    The proposed changes ensure snubber examination, testing and 
service life monitoring will continue to meet the requirements of 10 
CFR 50.55a(g). Snubbers will continue to be demonstrated OPERABLE by 
performance of a program for examination, testing and service life 
monitoring in compliance with 10 CFR 50.55a or authorized alternatives.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
    The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
this review, it appears that the three standards of 50.92(c) are 
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
    Attorney for licensee: William S. Blair, Managing Attorney--
Nuclear, Florida Power & Light, 700 Universe Blvd., MS LAW/JB, Juno 
Beach, Florida 33408-0420.
    NRC Branch Chief: Shana R. Helton.

III. Previously Published Notices of Consideration of Issuance of 
Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses, 
Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and 
Opportunity for a Hearing

    The following notices were previously published as separate 
individual notices. The notice content was the same as above. They were 
published as individual notices either because time did not allow the 
Commission to wait for this biweekly notice or because the action 
involved exigent circumstances. They are repeated here because the 
biweekly notice lists all amendments issued or proposed to be issued 
involving no significant hazards consideration.
    For details, see the individual notice in the Federal Register on 
the day and

[[Page 55391]]

page cited. This notice does not extend the notice period of the 
original notice.

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370, McGuire 
Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Mecklenburg Counties, North Carolina

    Date of amendment request: June 30, 2015. A publicly-available 
version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15191A025.
    Brief description of amendment request: The proposed amendment 
would allow a temporary extension of selected Technical Specification 
required Completion Times to support repair activities associated with 
the Nuclear Service Water System.
    Date of publication of individual notice in Federal Register: 
August 20, 2015 (80 FR 50663).
    Expiration date of individual notice: September 19, 2015 (public 
comments) and October 19, 2015 (hearing requests).

IV. Notice of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and 
Combined Licenses

    During the period since publication of the last biweekly notice, 
the Commission has issued the following amendments. The Commission has 
determined for each of these amendments that the application complies 
with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The 
Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the 
Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set 
forth in the license amendment.
    A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility 
operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no 
significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a 
hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal 
Register as indicated.
    Unless otherwise indicated, the Commission has determined that 
these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in 
accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), 
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be 
prepared for these amendments. If the Commission has prepared an 
environmental assessment under the special circumstances provision in 
10 CFR 51.22(b) and has made a determination based on that assessment, 
it is so indicated.
    For further details with respect to the action see (1) the 
applications for amendment, (2) the amendment, and (3) the Commission's 
related letter, Safety Evaluation and/or Environmental Assessment as 
indicated. All of these items can be accessed as described in the 
``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' section of this 
document.

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Docket No. 50-336, Millstone Power 
Station, Unit No. 2 (MPS2), New London County, Connecticut

    Date of amendment request: October 31, 2014.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the MPS2 
Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) to allow for the use of the encoded 
ultrasonic examination technique in lieu of the FSAR committed 
additional radiography examination for certain piping welds fabricated 
to American National Standards Institute B31.1.0. Specifically, the 
legend notes of MPS2 FSAR Figure 9.0.3, ``General Piping and 
Instrumentation Diagram'' were revised to replace the references to 
``radiography'' with ``volumetric examination.''
    Date of issuance: August 26, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 30 days from the date of issuance.
    Amendment No.: 322. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15225A008; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-65: Amendment revised 
the Renewed Operating License.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 9, 2015 (80 FR 
32626).
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 26, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Docket No. 50-423, Millstone Power 
Station, Unit No. 3 (MPS3), New London County, Connecticut

    Date of amendment request: October 14, 2014, as supplemented by 
letter dated August 27, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the MPS3 
Technical Specification (TS) surveillance requirement (SR) 4.4.4.2 to 
remove the requirement to perform the surveillance for a pressurizer 
power-operated relief valve block valve that is being maintained closed 
in accordance with TS 3.4.4 Action a.
    Date of issuance: August 28, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 60 days from the date of issuance.
    Amendment No.: 264. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15225A010; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-49: Amendment revised 
the Renewed Operating License and TSs.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: April 28, 2015 (80 FR 
23601). The supplemental letter dated August 27, 2015, provided 
additional information that clarified the application, did not expand 
the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change 
the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration 
determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 28, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370, McGuire 
Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

    Date of application for amendments: March 23, 2015.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments modify the 
definition of RATED THERMAL POWER and delete a footnote that allowed 
for staggered implementation of the previously approved Measurement 
Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate.
    Date of issuance: August 24, 2015.
    Effective date: This license amendment is effective as of its date 
of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: 280 and 260. A publicly-available version is in 
ADAMS under Accession No. ML15174A173; documents related to these 
amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the 
amendments.
    Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17: 
Amendments revised the Facility Operating Licenses and Technical 
Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 9, 2015 (80 FR 
32627).
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 24, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

[[Page 55392]]

Entergy Operations, Inc., System Energy Resources, Inc., South 
Mississippi Electric Power Association, and Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 
Docket No. 50-416, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Claiborne 
County, Mississippi

    Date of application for amendment: November 21, 2014, as 
supplemented by letter dated April 14, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised Technical 
Specification (TS) 2.1.1.2 of TS Section 2.1.1, ``Reactor Core SLs 
[Safety Limits].'' Specifically, the cycle-specific safety limit 
minimum critical power ratio values for Cycle 20 were revised in 
support of the Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus license 
amendment request.
    Date of issuance: August 18, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 180 days of issuance.
    Amendment No: 203. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15229A213; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Facility Operating License No. NPF-29: The amendment revised the 
Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 31, 2015 (80 FR 
17087). The supplemental letter dated April 14, 2015, provided 
additional information that clarified the application, did not expand 
the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change 
the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration 
determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Entergy Operations, Inc., System Energy Resources, Inc., South 
Mississippi Electric Power Association, and Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 
Docket No. 50-416, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (GGNS), Claiborne 
County, Mississippi

    Date of application for amendment: November 21, 2014, as 
supplemented by letters dated February 18, March 30, May 8, June 11, 
2015 and August 10, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the GGNS 
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report from the use of two different 
fluence calculational methods to the use of a single 3D fluence 
methodology for 0 effective full power years through the end of 
extended operations.
    Date of issuance: August 18, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 90 days of issuance.
    Amendment No: 204. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15229A218; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Facility Operating License No. NPF-29: The amendment revised the 
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 31, 2015 (80 FR 
17087). The supplemental letters dated March 30, May 8, June 11, 2015 
and August 10, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the 
application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally 
noticed, and did not change the staff's original proposed no 
significant hazards consideration determination as published in the 
Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: Yes. The 
comments received on Amendment No. 204 are addressed in the Safety 
Evaluation dated August 18, 2015.

Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-382, Waterford Steam Electric 
Station, Unit 3 (WF3), St. Charles Parish, Louisiana

    Date of amendment request: August 28, 2014, as supplemented by 
letters dated April 15, May 4, and June 18, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised Technical 
Specification 6.15, ``Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program,'' to 
allow for the extension of the 10-year frequency of the WF3 Type A or 
Integrated Leak Rate Test to 15 years on a permanent basis.
    Date of issuance: August 24, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
30 days from the date of issuance.
    Amendment No.: 244. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15217A143; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Facility Operating License No. NPF-38: The amendment revised the 
Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: December 9, 2014 (79 FR 
73109). The supplements dated April 15, May 4, and June 18, 2015, 
provided additional information that clarified the application, did not 
expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not 
change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 24, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Florida Power and Light Company, et al., Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389, 
St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, St. Lucie County, Florida

    Date of amendment request: August 26, 2014, as supplemented by 
letters dated January 14, February 6, and May 14, 2015.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised Technical 
Specification 6.8.4.h, ``Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program,'' to 
allow extension of the Type A test (i.e., Integrated Leak Rate Test) to 
a 15-year frequency.
    Date of issuance: August 27, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 60 days of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: 226 and 176. A publicly available version is in 
ADAMS under Accession No. ML15195A655; documents related to these 
amendments are listed in the safety evaluation (SE) enclosed with the 
amendments.
    Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-67 and NPF-16: 
Amendments revised the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses and 
Technical Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: January 20, 2015 (80 FR 
2750). The supplemental letters dated January 14, February 6, and May 
14, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the 
application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally 
noticed, and did not change the staff's original proposed no 
significant hazards consideration determination as published in the 
Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in an SE dated August 27, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No. A 
comment was received but it was not related to the amendment or to the 
proposed no significant hazards consideration determination.

[[Page 55393]]

Florida Power and Light Company, et al., Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389, 
St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, St. Lucie County, Florida

    Date of amendment request: August 7, 2014, as supplemented by 
letters dated February 20 and May 21, 2015.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised the 
Technical Specifications (TSs) by adopting Technical Specification Task 
Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-426, Revision 5, ``Revise or Add Actions to 
Preclude Entry into Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3--RITSTF 
[Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiatives 6b and 6c,'' which is an NRC-approved 
change to the Standard TSs. The amendments provide an additional 
allowed outage time to restore an inoperable system for conditions 
under which existing TSs require a plant shutdown.
    Date of Issuance: August 31, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 60 days of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: 227 and 177. A publicly-available version is in 
ADAMS under Accession No. ML15191A403; documents related to these 
amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation (SE) enclosed with the 
amendments.
    Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-67 and NPF-16: 
Amendments revised the TSs.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 17, 2015 (80 FR 
13908). The supplemental letters dated February 20 and May 21, 2015, 
provided additional information that clarified the application, did not 
expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not 
change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in an SE dated August 30, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Nebraska Public Power District, Docket No. 50-298, Cooper Nuclear 
Station, Nemaha County, Nebraska

    Date of amendment request: August 26, 2014, as supplemented by 
letters dated February 25 and July 13, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The proposed amendment revised the 
CNS Technical Specifications (TSs) by deleting Option b from TS 
Surveillance Requirement 3.5.2.1. Option b allows use of Condensate 
Storage Tank (CST) A as an alternative source of makeup water to the 
reactor pressure vessel during MODE 4 and MODE 5, but CST A is not 
qualified to Seismic Category I.
    Date of issuance: August 27, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 60 days of issuance.
    Amendment No.: 252. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15216A259; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-46: Amendment revised 
the Facility Operating License and TSs.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: December 23, 2014 (79 
FR 77047). The supplemental letters dated February 25 and July 13, 
2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, 
did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and 
did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 27, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Docket No. 50-331, Duane Arnold 
Energy Center (DAEC), Linn County, Iowa

    Date of amendment request: August 28, 2014.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised the DAEC 
Renewed Facility Operating License (FOL) to change the scheduled 
completion date for Milestone 8 of the Cyber Security Plan (CSP) 
Implementation Schedule. The amendment modified paragraph 2.C.(5) of 
the Renewed FOL No. DPR-49, which provides a license condition to 
require the licensee, to fully implement and maintain in effect all 
provisions of the NRC-approved CSP.
    Date of issuance: August 18, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 60 days.
    Amendment No.: 291. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15169A261; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-49: The amendment 
revised the renewed FOL.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: January 6, 2015 (80 FR 
535).
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Northern States Power Company--Minnesota, Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-
306, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Goodhue 
County, Minnesota

    Date of amendment requests: August 21, 2014, as supplemented by 
letters dated February 9, 2015, and July 31, 2015.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised the 
licensing basis analysis for a waste gas decay tank rupture at the 
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2.
    Date of issuance: August 26, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 30 days of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: Unit 1--215; Unit 2--203. A publicly-available 
version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15229A176; documents related 
to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with 
the amendments.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: October 28, 2014 (79 FR 
64227). The supplements dated February 9, 2015, and July 31, 2015, 
provided additional information that clarified the application, did not 
expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not 
change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 26, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323, Diablo 
Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, 
California

    Date of application for amendments: July 28, 2014, as supplemented 
by letters dated May 7, 2015 and August 6, 2015.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments modified the 
technical specifications to risk-inform requirements regarding selected 
Required Action End States. The proposed changes to the Required Action 
End States are described in Table 1 of the Enclosure to the licensee's 
letter dated July 28, 2014. The changes are consistent with Technical 
Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-432, Revision 1, ``Change 
in Technical Specifications End States (WCAP-16294)'' (ADAMS Accession 
No. ML103430249).
    Date of issuance: August 27, 2015.

[[Page 55394]]

    Effective date: As of its date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 120 days from the date of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: Unit 1--219; Unit 2--221. A publicly-available 
version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15204A222; documents related 
to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with 
the amendments.
    Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82: The amendments 
revised the Facility Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: September 30, 2014 (79 
FR 58823). The supplemental letters dated May 7 and August 6, 2015, 
provided additional information that clarified the application, did not 
expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not 
change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 27, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, South Carolina Public Service 
Authority, Docket No. 50-395, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1, 
Fairfield County, South Carolina

    Date of amendment request: December 19, 2014.
    Date of issuance: August 18, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment approves expansion of 
the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) boundary, a revision to the 
Evacuation Time Estimates analysis, and a revision to the Alert and 
Notification System design reports to encompass the expanded EPZ 
boundary.
    Effective date: As of the date of its issuance and shall be 
implemented within 90 days of issuance.
    Amendment No.: 201. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15170A087; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-12: Amendment revised 
the Renewed Facility Operating License.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: February 3, 2015 (80 FR 
5803).
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 18, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Docket No. 50-424, Vogtle 
Electric Generating Plant, Unit 1, Burke County, Georgia

    Date of application for amendments: June 4, 2015, as supplemented 
July 22 and July 31, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revises the Vogtle 
Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 1, Technical Specification (TS) 
Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.5.2, ``ECCS Operating'', such 
that with the `1A' Residual Heat Removal (RHR) pump inoperable for a 
motor replacement, the Completion Time of Condition 3.5.2.A changes 
from 72 hours to 7 days. This TS change would be in effect only for the 
`1A' RHR pump for the remainder of Cycle 19.
    Date of issuance: August 19, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 30 days from the date of issuance.
    Amendment No.: 176. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15209A874. Documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License Nos NPF-68: Amendment revised 
the Renewed Facility Operating License.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 23, 2015 (80 FR 
35983). The supplemental letters dated July 22 and July 31, 2015, 
provided additional information that clarified the application, did not 
expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not 
change the staff's original proposal no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 19, 2015. The Commission has made a 
final determination that no significant hazards consideration is 
involved for the proposed amendment, as discussed in the aforementioned 
Safety Evaluation.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

STP Nuclear Operating Company, Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499, South 
Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, Matagorda County, Texas

    Date of amendment request: May 15, 2014, as supplemented by letters 
dated July 10, 2014, February 11 and 26, and July 1, 2015.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments support a 
conversion from the current emergency action level scheme to a scheme 
based on Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, Revision 6, 
``Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors,'' 
dated November 2012.
    Date of issuance: August 20, 2015.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 180 days of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: Unit 1--206; Unit 2--194. A publicly-available 
version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15201A195; documents related 
to these amendments are listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with 
the amendments.
    Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80: The amendments 
authorize revisions to the Emergency Action Level Technical Bases 
Document.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: October 28, 2014 (79 FR 
64229). The supplemental letters dated February 11 and 26, and July 1, 
2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, 
did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and 
did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 20, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, Docket No. 50-482, Wolf Creek 
Generating Station, Coffey County, Kansas

    Date of amendment request: February 26, 2014, as supplemented by 
letters dated December 8, 2014, and January 21 and July 15, 2015.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revised Technical 
Specification 5.6.5, ``CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR),'' to 
incorporate Westinghouse Electric Company LLC's topical report WCAP-
16009-P-A, ``Realistic Large-Break LOCA [Loss-of-Coolant Accident] 
Evaluation Methodology Using the Automated Statistical Treatment of 
Uncertainty Method (ASTRUM),'' January 2005, to the list of analytical 
methods used to determine the core operating limits.
    Date of issuance: August 28, 2015.
    Effective date: Upon issuance and shall be implemented within 90 
days of the date of issuance.

[[Page 55395]]

    Amendment No.: 213. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under 
Accession No. ML15203A005; documents related to this amendment are 
listed in the Safety Evaluation enclosed with the amendment.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-42. The amendment 
revised the Operating License and Technical Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: September 9, 2014 (79 
FR 53462). The supplemental letters dated December 8, 2014, January 21, 
and July 15, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the 
application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally 
noticed, and did not change the staff's original proposed no 
significant hazards consideration determination as published in the 
Federal Register.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated August 28, 2015.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of September 2015.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anne Boland,
 Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015-23083 Filed 9-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.