Louisiana: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision, 55032-55035 [2015-23073]
Download as PDF
55032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 13, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Subpart R—Kansas
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
2. In § 52.870, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding entry (42) at
the end of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 52.870
*
Dated: August 20, 2015.
Mark Hague,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e)* * *
*
*
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
EPA-APPROVED KANSAS NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
*
*
*
(42) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for the
Attainment and Maintenance of National Ambient
Air Quality Standards for Regional Haze (2014
Five-Year Progress Report).
*
Statewide .........................
[FR Doc. 2015–23074 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R06–2015–0070 RCRA; FRL–9933–
79–Region 6]
Louisiana: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Louisiana has applied to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
for final authorization of the changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). The EPA has determined
that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization, and is authorizing the
State’s changes through this direct final
action. The EPA is publishing this rule
to authorize the changes without a prior
proposal because we believe this action
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
State submittal
date
EPA approval date
*
3/10/15
*
9/14/15 [Insert Federal
Register citation]
is not controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose it. Unless we
receive written comments which oppose
this authorization during the comment
period, the decision to authorize
Louisiana’s changes to its hazardous
waste program will take effect. If we
receive comments that oppose this
action, we will publish a document in
the Federal Register withdrawing this
rule before it takes effect, and a separate
document in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register will serve as a
proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on November 13, 2015
unless the EPA receives adverse written
comment by October 14, 2015. If the
EPA receives such comment, it will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final rule in the Federal Register
and inform the public that this
authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit any comments
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
RCRA–2015–0070, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Region 6,
Regional Authorization Coordinator,
State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD–O),
Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202–2733.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to Alima Patterson,
Region 6, Regional Authorization
Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight
Section (6PD–O), Multimedia Planning
and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733.
Instructions: Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov, or email. Direct your
comment to Docket No. EPA–R06–
RCRA–2015–0070. The Federal
regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider
your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any
form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses. You can view and
copy Louisiana’s application and
associated publicly available materials
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday
through Friday at the following
locations: Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality, 602 N. Fifth
Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70884–
2178, phone number (225) 219–3559
and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, phone
number (214) 665–8533. Interested
persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an
appointment with the office at least two
weeks in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal
Oversight Section (6PD–O), Multimedia
Planning and Permitting Division, EPA
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733, (214) 665–8533) and
Email address patterson.alima@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
States which have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
the changes. Changes to State programs
may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur.
Most commonly, States must change
their programs because of changes to the
EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260
through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have we made in this
rule?
We conclude that Louisiana’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
RCRA. Therefore, we grant Louisiana
final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application. Louisiana has
responsibility for permitting treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities within its
borders (except in Indian Country) and
for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised
program application, subject to the
limitations of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA).
New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates
under the authority of HSWA take effect
in authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
the EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in
Louisiana including issuing permits,
until the State is granted authorization
to do so.
C. What is the effect of today’s
authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that a
facility in Louisiana subject to RCRA
will now have to comply with the
authorized State requirements instead of
the equivalent Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Louisiana
has enforcement responsibilities under
its State hazardous waste program for
violations of such program, but the EPA
retains its authority under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority
to:
• Do inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports;
• enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits and
• take enforcement actions after
notice to and consultation with the
State.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Louisiana is being
authorized by today’s action are already
effective under State law, and are not
changed by today’s action.
D. Why wasn’t there a proposed rule
before today’s rule?
The EPA did not publish a proposal
before today’s rule because we view this
as a routine program change and do not
expect comments that oppose this
approval. We are providing an
opportunity for public comment now. In
addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of today’s Federal Register
we are publishing a separate document
that proposes to authorize the State
program changes.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55033
E. What happens if the EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
If the EPA receives comments that
oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this rule by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
the rule becomes effective. The EPA will
base any further decision on the
authorization of the State program
changes on the proposal mentioned in
the previous paragraph. We will then
address all public comments in a later
final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to
comment on this authorization, you
must do so at this time. If we receive
comments that oppose only the
authorization of a particular change to
the State hazardous waste program, we
will withdraw only that part of this rule,
but the authorization of the program
changes that the comments do not
oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal
Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization
will become effective, and which part is
being withdrawn.
F. For what has Louisiana previously
been authorized?
The State of Louisiana initially
received final authorization on February
7, 1985, (50 FR 3348), to implement its
base Hazardous Waste Management
Program. We granted authorization for
changes to their program on November
28, 1989 (54 FR 48889) effective January
29, 1990; August 26, 1991 (56 FR
41958), as corrected October 15, 1991
(56 FR 51762) effective October 25,
1991; November 7, 1994 (59 FR 55368)
effective January 23, 1995 (Note: on
January 23, 1995 (60 FR 4380), the EPA
responded to public adverse comments
and affirmed the effective date for the
November 7, 1994 final rule. Then on
April 11, 1995 (60 FR 18360), the EPA
also made administrative corrections for
the January 23, 1995 Federal Register
document); December 23, 1994 (59 FR
66200) effective March 8, 1995; October
17, 1995 (60 FR 53704) effective January
2, 1996; March 28, 1996 (61 FR 13777)
effective June 11, 1996; December 29,
1997 (62 FR 67572) effective March 16,
1998; October 23, 1998 (63 FR 56830)
effective December 22, 1998; August 25,
1999 (64 FR 46302) effective October 25,
1999; September 2, 1999 (64 FR 48099)
effective November 1, 1999; February
28, 2000 (65 FR 10411) effective April
28, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR 23)
effective March 5, 2001; December 9,
2003 (68 FR 68526) effective February 9,
2004; June 10, 2005 (70 FR 33852)
effective August 9, 2005; November 13,
2006 (71 FR 66116) effective January 12,
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
55034
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
2007; August 16, 2007 (72 FR 45905)
effective October 15, 2007; May 20, 2009
(74 FR 23645) effective July 20, 2009;
June 24, 2011(76 FR 122) effective
August 23, 2011; and June 28, 2012 (77
FR 38530) effective August 27, 2012. On
October 31, 2014, Louisiana applied for
approval of its program revisions for
specific rules in RCRA Clusters XXI,
XXII and XXIII, in accordance with 40
CFR 271.21(b)(3).
Since 1979 through the
Environmental Affairs Act, Act 449
enabled the Office of Environmental
Affairs within the Louisiana Department
of Natural Resources, as well as, the
Environmental Control Commission to
conduct an effective program designed
to regulate those who generate,
transport, treat, store, dispose or recycle
hazardous waste. During the 1983
Regular Session of the Louisiana
Legislature, Act 97 was adopted, which
amended and reenacted La. R. S.
30:1051 et seq. as the Environmental
Quality Act, renaming the
Environmental Affairs Act (Act 1938 of
1979). This Act created Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality
(LDEQ), including provisions for new
offices within this new Department of
Environmental Quality. Act 97 also
transferred the duties and
responsibilities previously delegated to
the Department of Natural Resources,
Office of Environmental Affairs, to the
new Department. The LDEQ has lead
agency jurisdictional authority for
administering the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Subtitle C program in Louisiana. Also,
the LDEQ is designated to facilitate
communication between the EPA and
the State. During the 1999 Regular
Session of Louisiana Legislature, Act
303 revised the La. R. S. 30:2011 et seq.,
allowing LDEQ to reengineer the
Department to perform more efficiently
and to meet its strategic goals.
Description of Federal requirement
(include checklist #, if relevant)
Federal Register
date and page
(and/or RCRA statutory authority)
1. Revision of the Land Disposal
Treatment Standards for Carbamate Wastes. (Checklist 227).
76 FR 34147–34157, June 13,
2011.
2. Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule.
(Checklist 228).
77 FR 22229–22232 April 13,
2012.
3. Conditional Exclusions for Solvent
Contaminated
Wipes.
(Checklist 229).
78 FR 46448–46485 July 31, 2013
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 2013 edition. Section 2299 Appendix Table 2,
Treatment Standards for Hazardous Waste, and Table 7, Universal
Treatment Standards, effective September 20, 2013.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 2010 edition and the March 2012 Supplement.
Sections 4901.C.Table 2, Hazardous Wastes from Specific
Sources, and 4139.B.2, effective March 20, 2012.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 2013 edition and the July 2014 Supplement. Sections 109 No Free Liquids, 109.Solvent Contaminated wipe,
109.Wipe, 105.D.1.w, and 105.D.2.q, effective July 20, 2014.
In this authorization of the State of
Louisiana program revisions for the
RCRA Cluster XXI, XXII, and XXIII
rules, there are no provisions that are
more stringent or broader in scope.
issue permits for HSWA requirements
for which Louisiana is not yet
authorized.
J. How does today’s action affect Indian
Country in Louisiana?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Louisiana will issue permits for all
the provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. The EPA will continue to
administer any RCRA hazardous waste
permits or portions of permits which we
issued prior to the effective date of this
authorization. We will not issue any
more new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in the
Table in this document after the
effective date of this authorization. The
EPA will continue to implement and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Louisiana is not authorized to carry
out its Hazardous Waste Program in
Indian Country within the State. This
authority remains with EPA. Therefore,
this action has no effect in Indian
Country.
K. What is codification and is the EPA
codifying Louisiana’s Hazardous Waste
Program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the CFR.
We do this by referencing the
authorized State rules in 40 CFR part
272. We reserve the amendment of 40
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
On October 31, 2014, Louisiana
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We
now make an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of written comments
that oppose this action, that Louisiana’s
hazardous waste program revision
satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for Final
authorization. Therefore, we grant the
State of Louisiana Final authorization
for the following changes: The State of
Louisiana’s program revisions consist of
regulations which specifically govern
Revision Checklists 227, 228, and 229
from RCRA Clusters XXI, XXII, XXIII,
respectively, as documented in this
Federal Register:
Analogous State authority
H. Where are the revised State rules
different from the Federal Rules?
I. Who handles permits after the
authorization takes effect?
G. What changes are we authorizing
with today’s action?
Sfmt 4700
CFR part 272, subpart T for this
authorization of Louisiana’s program
changes until a later date. In this
authorization application the EPA is not
codifying the rules documented in this
Federal Register notice.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action (RCRA
State Authorization) from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Therefore, this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, this action will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
authorizes pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). For the same reason,
this action also does not significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of
Tribal governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). This action will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
authorizes State requirements as part of
the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants
a State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. The
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the Executive
Order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. It’s main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this rule authorizes pre-existing
State rules which are at least equivalent
to, and no less stringent than existing
federal requirements, and impose no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human
health or environmental effects, the rule
is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this
document and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This action
nevertheless will be effective November
13, 2015.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55035
Dated: August 21, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015–23073 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 577
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0048]
RIN 2127–AL60
Defect and Noncompliance Notification
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends
NHTSA’s regulation requiring motor
vehicle manufacturers and replacement
equipment manufacturers to notify
owners and purchasers of a defect or
noncompliance in vehicles or
equipment that they produced. The
amendments in this final rule will
clarify that a manufacturer of
replacement equipment providing a
defect or noncompliance notification
pursuant to this regulation can inform
the purchaser of the replacement
equipment of the manufacturer’s intent
to remedy the defect or noncompliance
by refunding the purchase price of the
replacement equipment. NHTSA is
amending this regulation so that the
regulation conforms to changes in the
defect and noncompliance remedy
provisions in the National Traffic and
Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Safety Act)
contained in the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–
21).
DATES: Effective date: This final rule is
effective November 13, 2015.
Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions
for reconsideration of this final rule
must be received not later than October
29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Any petitions for
reconsideration should refer to the
docket number of this document and be
submitted to: Administrator, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Ground Floor, Docket Room
W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Healy, Office of Chief Counsel,
NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Healy’s
telephone number is (202) 366–2992.
His fax number is (202) 493–3820.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55032-55035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R06-2015-0070 RCRA; FRL-9933-79-Region 6]
Louisiana: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Louisiana has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for final authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste
program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The
EPA has determined that these changes satisfy all requirements needed
to qualify for final authorization, and is authorizing the State's
changes through this direct final action. The EPA is publishing this
rule to authorize the changes without a prior proposal because we
believe this action is not controversial and do not expect comments
that oppose it. Unless we receive written comments which oppose this
authorization during the comment period, the decision to authorize
Louisiana's changes to its hazardous waste program will take effect. If
we receive comments that oppose this action, we will publish a document
in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule before it takes effect,
and a separate document in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register will serve as a proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on November 13,
2015 unless the EPA receives adverse written comment by October 14,
2015. If the EPA receives such comment, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of this direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that this authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit any comments identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
RCRA-2015-0070, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional Authorization
Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD-O), Multimedia
Planning and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas Texas 75202-2733.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Alima
Patterson, Region 6, Regional Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal
Oversight Section (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division,
EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through regulations.gov, or email. Direct your
comment to Docket No. EPA-R06-RCRA-2015-0070. The Federal
regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to the EPA without going through regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
[[Page 55033]]
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. You can view and
copy Louisiana's application and associated publicly available
materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through Friday at the
following locations: Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, 602
N. Fifth Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70884-2178, phone number (225)
219-3559 and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733,
phone number (214) 665-8533. Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an appointment with the office at least two
weeks in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD-O),
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, (214) 665-8533) and Email address
patterson.alima@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from the EPA under
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes,
States must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or
State statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes
to the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
124, 260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have we made in this rule?
We conclude that Louisiana's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Louisiana final authorization
to operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in
the authorization application. Louisiana has responsibility for
permitting treatment, storage, and disposal facilities within its
borders (except in Indian Country) and for carrying out the aspects of
the RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject
to the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA take
effect in authorized States before they are authorized for the
requirements. Thus, the EPA will implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Louisiana including issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
C. What is the effect of today's authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that a facility in Louisiana subject
to RCRA will now have to comply with the authorized State requirements
instead of the equivalent Federal requirements in order to comply with
RCRA. Louisiana has enforcement responsibilities under its State
hazardous waste program for violations of such program, but the EPA
retains its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority to:
Do inspections, and require monitoring, tests, analyses,
or reports;
enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits
and
take enforcement actions after notice to and consultation
with the State.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Louisiana is
being authorized by today's action are already effective under State
law, and are not changed by today's action.
D. Why wasn't there a proposed rule before today's rule?
The EPA did not publish a proposal before today's rule because we
view this as a routine program change and do not expect comments that
oppose this approval. We are providing an opportunity for public
comment now. In addition to this rule, in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register we are publishing a separate document that
proposes to authorize the State program changes.
E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
If the EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we
will withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal
Register before the rule becomes effective. The EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of the State program changes on
the proposal mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address
all public comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this authorization,
you must do so at this time. If we receive comments that oppose only
the authorization of a particular change to the State hazardous waste
program, we will withdraw only that part of this rule, but the
authorization of the program changes that the comments do not oppose
will become effective on the date specified above. The Federal Register
withdrawal document will specify which part of the authorization will
become effective, and which part is being withdrawn.
F. For what has Louisiana previously been authorized?
The State of Louisiana initially received final authorization on
February 7, 1985, (50 FR 3348), to implement its base Hazardous Waste
Management Program. We granted authorization for changes to their
program on November 28, 1989 (54 FR 48889) effective January 29, 1990;
August 26, 1991 (56 FR 41958), as corrected October 15, 1991 (56 FR
51762) effective October 25, 1991; November 7, 1994 (59 FR 55368)
effective January 23, 1995 (Note: on January 23, 1995 (60 FR 4380), the
EPA responded to public adverse comments and affirmed the effective
date for the November 7, 1994 final rule. Then on April 11, 1995 (60 FR
18360), the EPA also made administrative corrections for the January
23, 1995 Federal Register document); December 23, 1994 (59 FR 66200)
effective March 8, 1995; October 17, 1995 (60 FR 53704) effective
January 2, 1996; March 28, 1996 (61 FR 13777) effective June 11, 1996;
December 29, 1997 (62 FR 67572) effective March 16, 1998; October 23,
1998 (63 FR 56830) effective December 22, 1998; August 25, 1999 (64 FR
46302) effective October 25, 1999; September 2, 1999 (64 FR 48099)
effective November 1, 1999; February 28, 2000 (65 FR 10411) effective
April 28, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR 23) effective March 5, 2001;
December 9, 2003 (68 FR 68526) effective February 9, 2004; June 10,
2005 (70 FR 33852) effective August 9, 2005; November 13, 2006 (71 FR
66116) effective January 12,
[[Page 55034]]
2007; August 16, 2007 (72 FR 45905) effective October 15, 2007; May 20,
2009 (74 FR 23645) effective July 20, 2009; June 24, 2011(76 FR 122)
effective August 23, 2011; and June 28, 2012 (77 FR 38530) effective
August 27, 2012. On October 31, 2014, Louisiana applied for approval of
its program revisions for specific rules in RCRA Clusters XXI, XXII and
XXIII, in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21(b)(3).
Since 1979 through the Environmental Affairs Act, Act 449 enabled
the Office of Environmental Affairs within the Louisiana Department of
Natural Resources, as well as, the Environmental Control Commission to
conduct an effective program designed to regulate those who generate,
transport, treat, store, dispose or recycle hazardous waste. During the
1983 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature, Act 97 was adopted,
which amended and reenacted La. R. S. 30:1051 et seq. as the
Environmental Quality Act, renaming the Environmental Affairs Act (Act
1938 of 1979). This Act created Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ), including provisions for new offices within this new
Department of Environmental Quality. Act 97 also transferred the duties
and responsibilities previously delegated to the Department of Natural
Resources, Office of Environmental Affairs, to the new Department. The
LDEQ has lead agency jurisdictional authority for administering the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C program in
Louisiana. Also, the LDEQ is designated to facilitate communication
between the EPA and the State. During the 1999 Regular Session of
Louisiana Legislature, Act 303 revised the La. R. S. 30:2011 et seq.,
allowing LDEQ to reengineer the Department to perform more efficiently
and to meet its strategic goals.
G. What changes are we authorizing with today's action?
On October 31, 2014, Louisiana submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We now make an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this action, that
Louisiana's hazardous waste program revision satisfies all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for Final authorization. Therefore,
we grant the State of Louisiana Final authorization for the following
changes: The State of Louisiana's program revisions consist of
regulations which specifically govern Revision Checklists 227, 228, and
229 from RCRA Clusters XXI, XXII, XXIII, respectively, as documented in
this Federal Register:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register
Description of Federal date and page
requirement (include (and/or RCRA Analogous State
checklist #, if relevant) statutory authority
authority)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Revision of the Land 76 FR 34147- Environmental
Disposal Treatment Standards 34157, June 13, Regulatory Code,
for Carbamate Wastes. 2011. Louisiana Department
(Checklist 227). of Environmental
Quality, ERC Title
33, Part V.
Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials,
2013 edition.
Section 2299
Appendix Table 2,
Treatment Standards
for Hazardous Waste,
and Table 7,
Universal Treatment
Standards, effective
September 20, 2013.
2. Hazardous Waste Technical 77 FR 22229-22232 Environmental
Corrections and April 13, 2012. Regulatory Code,
Clarifications Rule. Louisiana Department
(Checklist 228). of Environmental
Quality, ERC Title
33, Part V.
Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials,
2010 edition and the
March 2012
Supplement. Sections
4901.C.Table 2,
Hazardous Wastes
from Specific
Sources, and
4139.B.2, effective
March 20, 2012.
3. Conditional Exclusions for 78 FR 46448-46485 Environmental
Solvent Contaminated Wipes. July 31, 2013. Regulatory Code,
(Checklist 229). Louisiana Department
of Environmental
Quality, ERC Title
33, Part V.
Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials,
2013 edition and the
July 2014
Supplement. Sections
109 No Free Liquids,
109.Solvent
Contaminated wipe,
109.Wipe, 105.D.1.w,
and 105.D.2.q,
effective July 20,
2014.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
H. Where are the revised State rules different from the Federal Rules?
In this authorization of the State of Louisiana program revisions
for the RCRA Cluster XXI, XXII, and XXIII rules, there are no
provisions that are more stringent or broader in scope.
I. Who handles permits after the authorization takes effect?
Louisiana will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. The EPA will
continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of
permits which we issued prior to the effective date of this
authorization. We will not issue any more new permits or new portions
of permits for the provisions listed in the Table in this document
after the effective date of this authorization. The EPA will continue
to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which
Louisiana is not yet authorized.
J. How does today's action affect Indian Country in Louisiana?
Louisiana is not authorized to carry out its Hazardous Waste
Program in Indian Country within the State. This authority remains with
EPA. Therefore, this action has no effect in Indian Country.
K. What is codification and is the EPA codifying Louisiana's Hazardous
Waste Program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the CFR. We do this by referencing the authorized State
rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment of 40 CFR part 272,
subpart T for this authorization of Louisiana's program changes until a
later date. In this authorization application the EPA is not codifying
the rules documented in this Federal Register notice.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
(RCRA State Authorization) from the requirements of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011). Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, this action will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5
[[Page 55035]]
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action authorizes pre-existing
requirements under State law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4). For the same reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Tribal governments,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established by RCRA. This action also is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant and it does not make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not subject to Executive Order
13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001))
because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has
complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the Executive
Order. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. It's main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this rule authorizes pre-
existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less
stringent than existing federal requirements, and impose no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects,
the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document
and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action nevertheless will be effective November 13, 2015.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: August 21, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-23073 Filed 9-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P