Fee for Using a Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2016, 55121-55123 [2015-23006]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 735.
Additional Information: Copies of the
proposed collection may be obtained by
writing to the Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports
Clearance Officer. All requests should
be identified by the title of the
information collection. Email address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to
make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. Written
comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Email: OIRA_
SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn:
Desk Officer for the Administration for
Children and Families.
Robert Sargis,
ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–23017 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
[CFDA Number: 93.612]
Announcement of the Award of a
Single Source Emergency Grant to the
Oglala Sioux Tribe in Pine Ridge, SD
Administration for Native
Americans, ACF, HHS.
ACTION: Announcement of the award of
a single source, emergency grant to the
Oglala Sioux Tribe in Pine Ridge, SD to
address the critically high levels of
youth suicide on the reservation since
December 2014.
AGENCY:
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF),
Administration for Native Americans
(ANA) announces the award of a single
source emergency grant in the amount
of $400,000 to the Oglala Sioux Tribe to
provide empowerment activities for
youth in order to address the critically
high levels of youth suicide on the
reservation since December 2014.
DATES: The timeframe for the initial
award is July 31, 2015 to July 30, 2016.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carmelia Strickland, Director, Division
of Program Operations, Administration
for Native Americans, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20047.
Telephone: 877–922–9262; Email:
Carmelia.strickland@acf.hhs.gov.
The
Administration for Native Americans
(ANA), Administration for Children and
Families, has awarded an emergency
single source grant to the Oglala Sioux
Tribe (OST) for programs whose goal is
to empower youth ages 8 to 24 to make
changes in their communities, to be
proud of their heritage, and to inspire
them to celebrate life so that they may
see that there is a positive future for
them. It is intended that this program
will have a 24-month project period so
that another 12-month budget period
will be funded noncompetitively for
$400,000 in FY 2016. In testimony
before the Senate Committee on Indian
Affairs on June 24, 2015, Oglala Sioux
Tribe President John Yellowbird Steele’s
testimony stated that 11 young people
on the Pine Ridge Reservation have been
lost to suicide since December. In
addition, at least another 176 of the
youth have attempted suicide in that
period, according to the Indian Health
Service, and 229 more were treated for
suicidal ideation.
The awarded project is designed to
increase positive youth empowerment
activities in all nine districts on the Pine
Ridge Indian Reservation through the
development of Student Youth
Councils, peer to peer mentoring, and
Lakota cultural awareness activities.
The award was made under ANA’s
program for Social and Economic
Development Strategies (SEDS). The
OST has been designated as a Federal
government Promise Zone, because of
the severe financial and economic status
in the area in which they live. The Pine
Ridge Reservation is also located in
Shannon County, which is often
referred to as the poorest county in the
United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statutory Authority: This program is
authorized under § 803(a) of the Native
American Programs Act of 1974 (NAPA), 42
U.S.C. 2991b.
Christopher Beach,
Senior Grants Policy Specialist, Division of
Grants Policy, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–22957 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Delegation of Authority
Notice is hereby given that I have
delegated to the Administrator of the
Administration for Community Living,
or his or her successor, the following
authorities vested in the Secretary:
• The authorities vested under 42
U.S.C. 300d–52 and 300d–53, as
amended by Sections 3 and 4 of the
Traumatic Brain Injury Reauthorization
Act of 2014 (P.L. 113–196), titled ‘‘State
Grants for Projects Regarding Traumatic
Brain Injury’’ and ‘‘State Grants for
Protection and Advocacy Services.’’
(Prior to the passage of the Traumatic
Brain Injury Reauthorization Act of
2014, exercise of these authorities was
vested by statute with the
Administrator, Health Resources and
Services Administration.)
These authorities may be redelegated.
This delegation excludes the authority
to issue regulations, to establish
advisory committees and councils, and
appoint their members, and to submit
reports to Congress, and shall be
exercised in accordance with the
Department’s applicable policies,
procedures, and guidelines.
This delegation will concurrently
supersede all existing delegations of
these authorities.
I hereby affirm and ratify any actions
taken by agency officials which
involved the exercise of the authorities
delegated herein prior to the effective
date of this delegation.
This delegation is effective October 1,
2015.
Dated: August 31, 2015.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–23122 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0007]
Fee for Using a Tropical Disease
Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year
2016
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 4184–34–P
PO 00000
55121
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the fee rates for using a
SUMMARY:
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
55122
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Notices
tropical disease priority review voucher
for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA), authorizes FDA to
determine and collect priority review
user fees for certain applications for
approval of drug or biological products
when those applications use a tropical
disease priority review voucher
awarded by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services. These vouchers are
awarded to the sponsors of certain
tropical disease product applications,
submitted after September 27, 2007,
upon FDA approval of such
applications. The amount of the fee
submitted to FDA with applications
using a tropical disease priority review
voucher is determined each fiscal year
based on the difference between the
average cost incurred by FDA in the
review of a human drug application
subject to priority review in the
previous fiscal year, and the average
cost incurred in the review of an
application that is not subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year. This
notice establishes the tropical disease
priority review fee rate for FY 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of Financial
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd.,
COLE–14202F, Silver Spring, MD,
20993–0002, 301–796–7223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
Section 1102 of FDAAA (Pub. L. 110–
85) added section 524 to the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360n). In section 524,
Congress encouraged development of
new drug and biological products for
prevention and treatment of certain
tropical diseases by offering additional
incentives for obtaining FDA approval
of such products. Under section 524, the
sponsor of an eligible human drug
application submitted after September
27, 2007, for a qualified tropical disease
(as defined in section 524(a)(3) of the
FD&C Act), shall receive a priority
review voucher upon approval of the
tropical disease product application.
The recipient of a tropical disease
priority review voucher may either use
the voucher with a future submission to
FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), or transfer
(including by sale) the voucher to
another party that may then use it. A
priority review is a review conducted
with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) goal date of 6 months after the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
receipt or filing date, depending upon
the type of application. Information
regarding the PDUFA goals is available
at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
forindustry/userfees/
prescriptiondruguserfee/
ucm270412.pdf.
The applicant that uses a priority
review voucher is entitled to a priority
review but must pay FDA a priority
review user fee in addition to any other
fee required by PDUFA. FDA published
a draft guidance on its Web site about
how this tropical disease priority review
voucher program operates (available at:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
ucm080599.pdf).
This notice establishes the tropical
disease priority review fee rate for FY
2016 as $2,727,000 and outlines FDA’s
process for implementing the collection
of the priority review user fees. This rate
is effective on October 1, 2015, and will
remain in effect through September 30,
2016, for applications submitted with a
tropical disease priority review voucher.
The payment of this priority review user
fee is required in addition to the
payment of any other fee that would
normally apply to such an application
under PDUFA before FDA will consider
the application complete and acceptable
for filing.
II. Tropical Disease Priority Review
User Fee for FY 2016
Under section 524(c)(2) of the FD&C
Act, the amount of the tropical disease
priority review user fee is determined
each fiscal year based on the difference
between the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug
application subject to priority review in
the previous fiscal year, and the average
cost incurred by FDA in the review of
a human drug application that is not
subject to priority review in the
previous fiscal year. The priority review
voucher fee is intended to cover the
incremental costs for FDA to do a
priority review on a product that would
otherwise get a standard review. The
formula provides the Agency with the
added resources to conduct a priority
review while still ensuring a robust
priority review voucher program that is
consistent with the Agency’s public
health goal of encouraging the
development of new drug and biological
products.
A priority review is a review
conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months after the receipt or filing date,
depending on the type of application.
Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has
committed to reviewing and acting on
90 percent of the applications granted
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
priority review status within this
expedited timeframe. Normally, an
application for a human drug or
biological product will qualify for
priority review if the product is
intended to treat a serious condition
and, if approved, would provide a
significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness. An application that does
not receive a priority designation will
receive a standard review. Under the
PDUFA goals letter, FDA committed to
reviewing and acting on 90 percent of
standard applications within 10 months
of the receipt or filing date, depending
on the type of application. A priority
review involves a more intensive level
of effort and a higher level of resources
than a standard review.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies
that the fee amount should be based on
the difference between the average cost
incurred by the Agency in the review of
a human drug application subject to a
priority review in the previous fiscal
year, and the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug
application that is not subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year. FDA
is setting fees for FY 2016, and the
previous fiscal year is FY 2015.
However, the FY 2015 submission
cohort has not been closed out yet, and
the cost data for FY 2015 are not
complete. The latest year for which FDA
has complete cost data is FY 2014.
Furthermore, because FDA has never
tracked the cost of reviewing
applications that get priority review as
a separate cost subset, FDA estimated
this cost based on other data that the
Agency has tracked. FDA uses data that
the Agency estimates and publishes on
its Web site each year—standard costs
for review. FDA does not publish a
standard cost for ‘‘the review of a
human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous fiscal
year.’’ However, we expect all such
applications would contain clinical
data. The standard cost application
categories with clinical data that FDA
does publish each year are: (1) New
drug applications (NDAs) for a new
molecular entity (NME) with clinical
data and (2) biologics license
applications (BLAs).
The worksheets for standard costs for
FY 2014, show a standard cost (rounded
to the nearest thousand dollars) of
$5,646,000 for a NME NDA and
$5,533,000 for a BLA. Based on these
standard costs, the total cost to review
the 48 applications in these two
categories in FY 2014 (30 NME NDAs
with clinical data and 18 BLAs) was
$268,974,000. (Note: these numbers
exclude the President’s Emergency Plan
for AIDS Relief NDAs; no
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Notices
investigational new drug review costs
are included in this amount.) Twentynine of these applications (20 NDAs and
9 BLAs) received priority review, which
would mean that the remaining 19
received standard reviews. Because a
priority review compresses a review that
ordinarily takes 10 months into 6
months, FDA estimates that a multiplier
of 1.67 (10 months divided by 6 months)
should be applied to non-priority
review costs in estimating the effort and
cost of a priority review as compared to
a standard review. This multiplier is
consistent with published research on
this subject. In the article ‘‘Developing
Drugs for Developing Countries,’’
published in ‘‘Health Affairs,’’ Volume
25, Number 2, in 2006, the comparison
of historical average review times by
David B. Ridley, Henry G. Grabowski,
and Jeffrey L. Moe, supports a priority
review multiplier in the range of 1.48 to
2.35. The multiplier derived by FDA
falls well below the midpoint of this
range. Using FY 2014 figures, the costs
of a priority and standard review are
estimated using the following formula:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(29 a × 1.67) + (19 a) = $268,974,000
where ‘‘a’’ is the cost of a standard
review and ‘‘a × 1.67’’ is the cost of a
priority review. Using this formula, the
cost of a standard review for NME NDAs
and BLAs is calculated to be $3,989,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars) and the cost of a priority review
for NME NDAs and BLAs is 1.67 times
that amount, or $6,662,000 (rounded to
the nearest thousand dollars). The
difference between these two cost
estimates, or $2,673,000, represents the
incremental cost of conducting a
priority review rather than a standard
review.
For the FY 2016 fee, FDA will need
to adjust the FY 2014 incremental cost
by the average amount by which FDA’s
average costs increased in the 3 years
prior to FY 2015, to adjust the FY 2014
amount for cost increases in FY 2015.
That adjustment, published in the
Federal Register on August 3, 2015 (see
80 FR 46028 at 46029), setting FY 2016
PDUFA fees, is 2.0266 percent for the
most recent year, not compounded.
Increasing the FY 2014 incremental
priority review cost of $2,673,000 by
2.0266 percent results in an estimated
cost of $2,727,000 (rounded to the
nearest thousand dollars). This is the
priority review user fee amount for FY
2016 that must be submitted with a
priority review voucher in FY 2016, in
addition to any PDUFA fee that is
required for such an application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
III. Fee Schedule for FY 2016
The fee rate for FY 2016 is set out in
table 1:
TABLE
ORITY
1—TROPICAL DISEASE PRIREVIEW SCHEDULE FOR FY
2016
Fee category
Fee rate for
FY 2016
Application submitted with a
tropical disease priority review voucher in addition to
the normal PDUFA fee .........
$2,727,000
IV. Implementation of Tropical Disease
Priority Review User Fee
Under section 524(c)(4)(A) of the
FD&C Act, the priority review user fee
is due upon submission of a human
drug application for which the priority
review voucher is used. Section
524(c)(4)(B) of the FD&C Act specifies
that the application will be considered
incomplete if the priority review user
fee and all other applicable user fees are
not paid in accordance with FDA
payment procedures. In addition, FDA
may not grant a waiver, exemption,
reduction, or refund of any fees due and
payable under this section of the FD&C
Act and FDA may not collect priority
review voucher fees prior to a relevant
appropriation for fees for that fiscal
year. Beginning with FDA’s
appropriation for FY 2009, the annual
appropriation language states
specifically that ‘‘priority review user
fees authorized by 21 U.S.C. 360n
(section 524 of the FD&C Act) may be
credited to this account, to remain
available until expended.’’ (Pub. L.
111–8, Section 5, Division A, Title VI).
The tropical disease priority review
fee established in the new fee schedule
must be paid for any application that is
received on or after October 1, 2015, and
submitted with a priority review
voucher. This fee must be paid in
addition to any other fee due under
PDUFA. Payment must be made in U.S.
currency by check, bank draft, or U.S.
postal money order payable to the order
of the Food and Drug Administration.
The user fee identification (ID) number
should be included on the check,
followed by the words ‘‘Tropical
Disease Priority Review.’’ Payments can
be mailed to: Food and Drug
Administration, P.O. Box 979107, St.
Louis, MO 63197–9000.
If checks are sent by a courier that
requests a street address, the courier can
deliver the checks to: U.S. Bank,
Attention: Government Lockbox 979107,
1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
63101. (Note: This U.S. Bank address is
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55123
for courier delivery only.) The FDA post
office box number (P.O. Box 979107)
must be written on the check. The tax
identification number of FDA is 53–
0196965.
Wire transfer payments may also be
used. Please reference your unique user
fee ID number when completing your
transfer. The originating financial
institution may charge a wire transfer
fee. Please ask your financial institution
about the fee and include it with your
payment to ensure that your fee is fully
paid. The account information is as
follows: New York Federal Reserve
Bank, U.S. Dept. of Treasury, TREAS
NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY
10045, Account Number: 75060099,
Routing Number: 021030004, SWIFT:
FRNYUS33, Beneficiary: FDA, 8455
Colesville Rd., Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002.
Dated: September 8, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–23006 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0001]
Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug
Products Advisory Committee; Notice
of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The meeting will be open to the
public.
Name of Committee: Anesthetic and
Analgesic Drug Products Advisory
Committee.
General Function of the Committee:
To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on
FDA’s regulatory issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on November 6, 2015, from 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
Location: FDA White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm.
1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002.
Answers to commonly asked questions
including information regarding special
accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may
be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55121-55123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23006]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0007]
Fee for Using a Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher in
Fiscal Year 2016
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the fee rates for using a
[[Page 55122]]
tropical disease priority review voucher for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA), authorizes
FDA to determine and collect priority review user fees for certain
applications for approval of drug or biological products when those
applications use a tropical disease priority review voucher awarded by
the Secretary of Health and Human Services. These vouchers are awarded
to the sponsors of certain tropical disease product applications,
submitted after September 27, 2007, upon FDA approval of such
applications. The amount of the fee submitted to FDA with applications
using a tropical disease priority review voucher is determined each
fiscal year based on the difference between the average cost incurred
by FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred in
the review of an application that is not subject to priority review in
the previous fiscal year. This notice establishes the tropical disease
priority review fee rate for FY 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of
Financial Management, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville
Rd., COLE-14202F, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 301-796-7223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1102 of FDAAA (Pub. L. 110-85) added section 524 to the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360n). In section 524, Congress encouraged
development of new drug and biological products for prevention and
treatment of certain tropical diseases by offering additional
incentives for obtaining FDA approval of such products. Under section
524, the sponsor of an eligible human drug application submitted after
September 27, 2007, for a qualified tropical disease (as defined in
section 524(a)(3) of the FD&C Act), shall receive a priority review
voucher upon approval of the tropical disease product application. The
recipient of a tropical disease priority review voucher may either use
the voucher with a future submission to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), or transfer (including by sale) the
voucher to another party that may then use it. A priority review is a
review conducted with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal
date of 6 months after the receipt or filing date, depending upon the
type of application. Information regarding the PDUFA goals is available
at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm270412.pdf.
The applicant that uses a priority review voucher is entitled to a
priority review but must pay FDA a priority review user fee in addition
to any other fee required by PDUFA. FDA published a draft guidance on
its Web site about how this tropical disease priority review voucher
program operates (available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm080599.pdf).
This notice establishes the tropical disease priority review fee
rate for FY 2016 as $2,727,000 and outlines FDA's process for
implementing the collection of the priority review user fees. This rate
is effective on October 1, 2015, and will remain in effect through
September 30, 2016, for applications submitted with a tropical disease
priority review voucher. The payment of this priority review user fee
is required in addition to the payment of any other fee that would
normally apply to such an application under PDUFA before FDA will
consider the application complete and acceptable for filing.
II. Tropical Disease Priority Review User Fee for FY 2016
Under section 524(c)(2) of the FD&C Act, the amount of the tropical
disease priority review user fee is determined each fiscal year based
on the difference between the average cost incurred by FDA in the
review of a human drug application subject to priority review in the
previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by FDA in the
review of a human drug application that is not subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year. The priority review voucher fee is
intended to cover the incremental costs for FDA to do a priority review
on a product that would otherwise get a standard review. The formula
provides the Agency with the added resources to conduct a priority
review while still ensuring a robust priority review voucher program
that is consistent with the Agency's public health goal of encouraging
the development of new drug and biological products.
A priority review is a review conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of
application. Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has committed to
reviewing and acting on 90 percent of the applications granted priority
review status within this expedited timeframe. Normally, an application
for a human drug or biological product will qualify for priority review
if the product is intended to treat a serious condition and, if
approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness. An application that does not receive a priority
designation will receive a standard review. Under the PDUFA goals
letter, FDA committed to reviewing and acting on 90 percent of standard
applications within 10 months of the receipt or filing date, depending
on the type of application. A priority review involves a more intensive
level of effort and a higher level of resources than a standard review.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies that the fee amount should be
based on the difference between the average cost incurred by the Agency
in the review of a human drug application subject to a priority review
in the previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by FDA in
the review of a human drug application that is not subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year. FDA is setting fees for FY 2016,
and the previous fiscal year is FY 2015. However, the FY 2015
submission cohort has not been closed out yet, and the cost data for FY
2015 are not complete. The latest year for which FDA has complete cost
data is FY 2014. Furthermore, because FDA has never tracked the cost of
reviewing applications that get priority review as a separate cost
subset, FDA estimated this cost based on other data that the Agency has
tracked. FDA uses data that the Agency estimates and publishes on its
Web site each year--standard costs for review. FDA does not publish a
standard cost for ``the review of a human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous fiscal year.'' However, we expect all
such applications would contain clinical data. The standard cost
application categories with clinical data that FDA does publish each
year are: (1) New drug applications (NDAs) for a new molecular entity
(NME) with clinical data and (2) biologics license applications (BLAs).
The worksheets for standard costs for FY 2014, show a standard cost
(rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) of $5,646,000 for a NME NDA
and $5,533,000 for a BLA. Based on these standard costs, the total cost
to review the 48 applications in these two categories in FY 2014 (30
NME NDAs with clinical data and 18 BLAs) was $268,974,000. (Note: these
numbers exclude the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief NDAs; no
[[Page 55123]]
investigational new drug review costs are included in this amount.)
Twenty-nine of these applications (20 NDAs and 9 BLAs) received
priority review, which would mean that the remaining 19 received
standard reviews. Because a priority review compresses a review that
ordinarily takes 10 months into 6 months, FDA estimates that a
multiplier of 1.67 (10 months divided by 6 months) should be applied to
non-priority review costs in estimating the effort and cost of a
priority review as compared to a standard review. This multiplier is
consistent with published research on this subject. In the article
``Developing Drugs for Developing Countries,'' published in ``Health
Affairs,'' Volume 25, Number 2, in 2006, the comparison of historical
average review times by David B. Ridley, Henry G. Grabowski, and
Jeffrey L. Moe, supports a priority review multiplier in the range of
1.48 to 2.35. The multiplier derived by FDA falls well below the
midpoint of this range. Using FY 2014 figures, the costs of a priority
and standard review are estimated using the following formula:
(29 [alpha] x 1.67) + (19 [alpha]) = $268,974,000
where ``[alpha]'' is the cost of a standard review and ``[alpha] x
1.67'' is the cost of a priority review. Using this formula, the cost
of a standard review for NME NDAs and BLAs is calculated to be
$3,989,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) and the cost of a
priority review for NME NDAs and BLAs is 1.67 times that amount, or
$6,662,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). The difference
between these two cost estimates, or $2,673,000, represents the
incremental cost of conducting a priority review rather than a standard
review.
For the FY 2016 fee, FDA will need to adjust the FY 2014
incremental cost by the average amount by which FDA's average costs
increased in the 3 years prior to FY 2015, to adjust the FY 2014 amount
for cost increases in FY 2015. That adjustment, published in the
Federal Register on August 3, 2015 (see 80 FR 46028 at 46029), setting
FY 2016 PDUFA fees, is 2.0266 percent for the most recent year, not
compounded. Increasing the FY 2014 incremental priority review cost of
$2,673,000 by 2.0266 percent results in an estimated cost of $2,727,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). This is the priority review
user fee amount for FY 2016 that must be submitted with a priority
review voucher in FY 2016, in addition to any PDUFA fee that is
required for such an application.
III. Fee Schedule for FY 2016
The fee rate for FY 2016 is set out in table 1:
Table 1--Tropical Disease Priority Review Schedule for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee rate for
Fee category FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application submitted with a tropical disease priority $2,727,000
review voucher in addition to the normal PDUFA fee.......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Implementation of Tropical Disease Priority Review User Fee
Under section 524(c)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, the priority review
user fee is due upon submission of a human drug application for which
the priority review voucher is used. Section 524(c)(4)(B) of the FD&C
Act specifies that the application will be considered incomplete if the
priority review user fee and all other applicable user fees are not
paid in accordance with FDA payment procedures. In addition, FDA may
not grant a waiver, exemption, reduction, or refund of any fees due and
payable under this section of the FD&C Act and FDA may not collect
priority review voucher fees prior to a relevant appropriation for fees
for that fiscal year. Beginning with FDA's appropriation for FY 2009,
the annual appropriation language states specifically that ``priority
review user fees authorized by 21 U.S.C. 360n (section 524 of the FD&C
Act) may be credited to this account, to remain available until
expended.'' (Pub. L. 111-8, Section 5, Division A, Title VI).
The tropical disease priority review fee established in the new fee
schedule must be paid for any application that is received on or after
October 1, 2015, and submitted with a priority review voucher. This fee
must be paid in addition to any other fee due under PDUFA. Payment must
be made in U.S. currency by check, bank draft, or U.S. postal money
order payable to the order of the Food and Drug Administration. The
user fee identification (ID) number should be included on the check,
followed by the words ``Tropical Disease Priority Review.'' Payments
can be mailed to: Food and Drug Administration, P.O. Box 979107, St.
Louis, MO 63197-9000.
If checks are sent by a courier that requests a street address, the
courier can deliver the checks to: U.S. Bank, Attention: Government
Lockbox 979107, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101. (Note: This
U.S. Bank address is for courier delivery only.) The FDA post office
box number (P.O. Box 979107) must be written on the check. The tax
identification number of FDA is 53-0196965.
Wire transfer payments may also be used. Please reference your
unique user fee ID number when completing your transfer. The
originating financial institution may charge a wire transfer fee.
Please ask your financial institution about the fee and include it with
your payment to ensure that your fee is fully paid. The account
information is as follows: New York Federal Reserve Bank, U.S. Dept. of
Treasury, TREAS NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY 10045, Account
Number: 75060099, Routing Number: 021030004, SWIFT: FRNYUS33,
Beneficiary: FDA, 8455 Colesville Rd., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Dated: September 8, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-23006 Filed 9-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P