Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuge, Accomack County, Virginia; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 54799-54800 [2015-21925]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Notices
development. The full agenda and
related briefing materials will be posted
for review by September 22, 2015, at
https://www.fema.gov/TMAC.
Dated: September 4, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance
and Mitigation.
[FR Doc. 2015–22950 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–R–2015–N090;BAC–4311–K9–S3]
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge
and Wallops Island National Wildlife
Refuge, Accomack County, Virginia;
Final Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; final
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
availability for review of our final
comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)
and environmental impact statement
(EIS) for Chincoteague National Wildlife
Refuge (NWR, refuge) and Wallops
Island NWR. The CCP/EIS describes
how we propose to manage both the
staffed 14,032-acre Chincoteague NWR
and the unstaffed 373-acre Wallops
Island NWR over the next 15 years.
DATES: We will sign a record of decision
no sooner than 30 days after the
publication of this notice.
ADDRESSES: You may view, obtain, or
request CD–ROM copies of the final
CCP/EIS by any of the following
methods.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the document at https://www.fws.gov/
refuge/Chincoteague/what_we_do/
conservation.html.
Email: Send requests to
northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Chincoteague NWR’’ in the subject line
of your email.
U.S. Mail: Thomas Bonetti, Natural
Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center
Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Visit
during regular business hours at refuge
headquarters, 8231 Beach Road,
Chincoteague Island, VA 23336.
To view comments on the final CCP–
EIS from the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), or for information on
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Sep 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
54799
EPA’s role in the EIS process, see EPA’s
Role in the EIS Process under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Bonetti, Natural Resource
Planner, 413–253–8307 (phone);
northeastplanning@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering the refuges for 15
years. Alternative B, as we described in
the final CCP/EIS, is our preferred
alternative.
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Chincoteague NWR and
Wallops Island NWR, which we began
by publishing a notice of intent in the
Federal Register (75 FR 57056) on
September 17, 2010. For more about the
initial process and the history of the
refuges, see that notice. On May 15,
2014, we announced the release of the
draft CCP/EIS to the public and
requested comments in a notice of
availability in the Federal Register (79
FR 27906). We subsequently extended
the public comment period in another
notice in the Federal Register (79 FR
41300) on July 15, 2014. In addition,
EPA published a notice announcing the
draft CCP and EIS (79 FR 29759; May
23, 2014), as required under section 309
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 U.S.C.
7401 et seq.). We now announce the
final CCP and EIS. Under the CAA, EPA
also will announce the final CCP and
EIS via the Federal Register.
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each NWR. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and goals and
contributing to the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System. CCPs
should be consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies, as well as
respond to key issues and public
concerns. In addition to outlining broad
management direction on conserving
wildlife and their habitats, CCPs
identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years, in accordance with the
Refuge Administration Act.
EPA’s Role in the EIS Process
The EPA is charged under section 309
of the Clean Air Act to review all
Federal agencies’ EISs and to comment
on the adequacy and the acceptability of
the environmental impacts of proposed
actions in the EISs.
EPA also serves as the repository (EIS
database) for EISs prepared by Federal
agencies and provides notice of their
availability in the Federal Register. The
EIS Database provides information
about EISs prepared by Federal
agencies, as well as EPA’s comments
concerning the EISs. All EISs are filed
with EPA, which publishes a notice of
availability on Fridays in the Federal
Register.
The notice of availability is the start
of the 45-day public comment period for
draft EISs, and the start of the 30-day
‘‘wait period’’ for final EISs, during
which agencies are generally required to
wait 30 days before making a decision
on a proposed action. For more
information, see https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. You
may search for EPA comments on EISs,
along with EISs themselves, at https://
cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/
action/eis/search. We completed a
thorough analysis of impacts on the
human environment in the final CCP/
EIS, and responded to public comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The CCP Process
CCP/EIS Alternatives
We evaluated three alternatives for
managing Chincoteague NWR and
Wallops Island NWR; alternative B is
our preferred alternative. Based on
feedback on the draft CCP/EIS, some
modifications have been made to
alternative B and are summarized
below. A full description of all
alternatives, including changes to our
preferred alternative, can be found in
the final CCP/EIS at the sources
identified in ADDRESSES.
Changes to Alternative B, the Service’s
Preferred Alternative
• The assigned area, consisting of the
1-mile recreational beach, associated
parking, and new Visitor Contact
Station, would extend south 1 more
mile to the terminus of Swan Cove Trail
(2 miles total), thus doubling the length
of the assigned area.
• Over sand vehicles (OSV) and
hiking access would continue via Beach
Road across Toms Cove south to Fishing
Point September 16 through March 14.
• A new 1⁄2-mile, OSV zone to
facilitate the six priority uses (March 15
through September 15) would be
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
54800
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Notices
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
developed south of new recreational
beach, and added to the new assigned
area. We would continue current
management of the Overwash and Hook
area for shorebirds until the new
recreational beach is established, at
which time the March 15 through
September 15 closure would go into
effect.
• We will keep current biking access
open via Swan Cove Trail and will not
propose an alternative bike route north
to the relocated public beach (from
Wildlife Loop to Mallard (C Dike)).
• The Service Road would continue
to be open year-round to hikers north to
the refuge/National Seashore boundary.
• A section of the Affected
Environment (Chapter 3) on cultural
resources was inadvertently left out of
the draft CCP/EIS. This section, which
has been coordinated with the Virginia
Department of Historic Resources, is
included in the final CCP/EIS.
Other Features of Alternative B
Alternative B would continue
established habitat and wildlife
management strategies but focus them
in light of the new goals and vision
established by the CCP. The alternative
balances habitat management, public
use and access, and administration of
the refuge. We would continue to
preserve approximately 2,650 acres of
wetland impoundments, but make
adjustments in accordance with a new
impoundment management plan that
takes into account various factors, such
as the habitat needs of black ducks and
monarch butterflies, climate change and
natural coastal processes, and relocated
beach access and parking. The refuge
would continue to protect and enhance
the wilderness character of the 1974
proposed wilderness area, and there
would be no change in its size (1,300
acres) or location.
In recognition of the vulnerability of
the current parking, the refuge would
develop and implement a site design
plan for parking and access to a new
beach location, approximately 1.5 miles
north of the existing beach. We are
committed to working with the National
Park Service (NPS) and others to future
design, refine, and analyze beach
relocation infrastructure in a separate
National Environmental Policy Act
document.
Over the next 15 years, the refuge
would maintain and, where possible,
expand current hunting opportunities
by including additional species,
extending hours, and providing special
events. The refuge would add mourning
doves, light geese, and non-migratory
Canada goose hunting opportunities to
the refuge’s migratory bird hunting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Sep 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
program. Additionally, the refuge would
allow migratory bird hunting on Federal
holidays within the Commonwealth of
Virginia hunting seasons. The refuge
would also add turkeys to the big game
hunting program and pursue
development of a trapping program for
furbearers. The refuge would continue
sika hunting and would conduct
research to identify a desired population
size.
The refuge would pursue partnerships
to enhance land conservation,
environmental education, and
interpretation on the Delmarva
Peninsula. The ‘‘Chincoteague ponies’’
have a strong cultural tie to the
community, and the refuge would
implement a Chincoteague pony
management plan that meets multiple
objectives: visitor viewing, habitat
management, and pony health. The
refuge would allow grazing of the
current pony population, with a
maximum pony herd size of 150, per the
management agreement with the
Chincoteague Volunteer Fire Company.
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP/
EIS as indicated under ADDRESSES.
During the public comment period, a
total of 236 emails and 94 letters were
received, including official comments
from the town of Chincoteague, the
Chincoteague Chamber of Commerce,
The Nature Conservancy, NPS,
Environmental Protection Agency,
various departments from the
Commonwealth of Virginia, and other
local interest groups. In addition a
petition was submitted supporting
Alternative ‘‘A plus,’’ an alternative
with elements of both alternative A and
B, with approximately 600 individuals
signing. Another petition supporting the
preferred alternative (alternative B) was
submitted with 112 individuals signing.
We held two public open house
meetings in Chincoteague, and
additional meetings in Melfa, Virginia,
and Pocomoke City, Maryland. As part
of the public involvement process, we
held a public hearing on June 26, 2014,
in Chincoteague with 28 people
formally raising a variety of issues and
concerns.
We evaluated all the letters and
emails sent to us during that comment
period, along with comments recorded
at our public hearing, and addressed all
substantive comments. A summary of
those comments and our responses to
them is included in the final CCP/EIS as
appendix R.
Frm 00039
We will document the final decision
in a record of decision, which will be
published in the Federal Register after
a 30-day ‘‘wait period’’ that begins when
EPA announces this final CCP–EIS. For
more information, see EPA’s Role in the
EIS Process.
Dated: August 18, 2015.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–21925 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB01000. L51100000.GN0000. LVEMF
1503550.15X MO# 4500077415]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Gold Bar Mine Project,
Eureka County, NV
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Mount Lewis
Field Office, Battle Mountain, Nevada,
intends to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) and by this
notice is announcing the beginning of
the scoping process to solicit public
comments and identify issues.
DATES: This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the EIS. Comments
on issues may be submitted in writing
until October 13, 2015. The date(s) and
location(s) of any scoping meetings will
be announced at least 15 days in
advance through local media,
newspapers and the BLM Web site at:
https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/battle_
mountain_field/blm_information/
national_environmental.html. In order
to be included in the Draft EIS, all
comments must be received prior to the
close of the 30-day scoping period or 15
days after the last public meeting,
whichever is later. We will provide
additional opportunities for public
participation upon publication of the
Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the Gold Bar Mine Project by
any of the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/
en/fo/battle_mountain_field/blm_
SUMMARY:
Comments
PO 00000
Next Steps
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 176 (Friday, September 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54799-54800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21925]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R5-R-2015-N090;BAC-4311-K9-S3]
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Wallops Island National
Wildlife Refuge, Accomack County, Virginia; Final Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; final comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability for review of our final comprehensive conservation plan
(CCP) and environmental impact statement (EIS) for Chincoteague
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR, refuge) and Wallops Island NWR. The CCP/
EIS describes how we propose to manage both the staffed 14,032-acre
Chincoteague NWR and the unstaffed 373-acre Wallops Island NWR over the
next 15 years.
DATES: We will sign a record of decision no sooner than 30 days after
the publication of this notice.
ADDRESSES: You may view, obtain, or request CD-ROM copies of the final
CCP/EIS by any of the following methods.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the document at https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Chincoteague/what_we_do/conservation.html.
Email: Send requests to northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include
``Chincoteague NWR'' in the subject line of your email.
U.S. Mail: Thomas Bonetti, Natural Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Visit during regular business hours at
refuge headquarters, 8231 Beach Road, Chincoteague Island, VA 23336.
To view comments on the final CCP-EIS from the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), or for information on EPA's role in the EIS
process, see EPA's Role in the EIS Process under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Bonetti, Natural Resource
Planner, 413-253-8307 (phone); northeastplanning@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Chincoteague NWR
and Wallops Island NWR, which we began by publishing a notice of intent
in the Federal Register (75 FR 57056) on September 17, 2010. For more
about the initial process and the history of the refuges, see that
notice. On May 15, 2014, we announced the release of the draft CCP/EIS
to the public and requested comments in a notice of availability in the
Federal Register (79 FR 27906). We subsequently extended the public
comment period in another notice in the Federal Register (79 FR 41300)
on July 15, 2014. In addition, EPA published a notice announcing the
draft CCP and EIS (79 FR 29759; May 23, 2014), as required under
section 309 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). We now
announce the final CCP and EIS. Under the CAA, EPA also will announce
the final CCP and EIS via the Federal Register.
EPA's Role in the EIS Process
The EPA is charged under section 309 of the Clean Air Act to review
all Federal agencies' EISs and to comment on the adequacy and the
acceptability of the environmental impacts of proposed actions in the
EISs.
EPA also serves as the repository (EIS database) for EISs prepared
by Federal agencies and provides notice of their availability in the
Federal Register. The EIS Database provides information about EISs
prepared by Federal agencies, as well as EPA's comments concerning the
EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA, which publishes a notice of
availability on Fridays in the Federal Register.
The notice of availability is the start of the 45-day public
comment period for draft EISs, and the start of the 30-day ``wait
period'' for final EISs, during which agencies are generally required
to wait 30 days before making a decision on a proposed action. For more
information, see https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. You
may search for EPA comments on EISs, along with EISs themselves, at
https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search. We
completed a thorough analysis of impacts on the human environment in
the final CCP/EIS, and responded to public comments.
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering the refuges for
15 years. Alternative B, as we described in the final CCP/EIS, is our
preferred alternative.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each NWR. The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
purposes and goals and contributing to the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System. CCPs should be consistent with sound principles
of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies, as well as respond to key issues and public concerns. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years, in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
CCP/EIS Alternatives
We evaluated three alternatives for managing Chincoteague NWR and
Wallops Island NWR; alternative B is our preferred alternative. Based
on feedback on the draft CCP/EIS, some modifications have been made to
alternative B and are summarized below. A full description of all
alternatives, including changes to our preferred alternative, can be
found in the final CCP/EIS at the sources identified in ADDRESSES.
Changes to Alternative B, the Service's Preferred Alternative
The assigned area, consisting of the 1-mile recreational
beach, associated parking, and new Visitor Contact Station, would
extend south 1 more mile to the terminus of Swan Cove Trail (2 miles
total), thus doubling the length of the assigned area.
Over sand vehicles (OSV) and hiking access would continue
via Beach Road across Toms Cove south to Fishing Point September 16
through March 14.
A new \1/2\-mile, OSV zone to facilitate the six priority
uses (March 15 through September 15) would be
[[Page 54800]]
developed south of new recreational beach, and added to the new
assigned area. We would continue current management of the Overwash and
Hook area for shorebirds until the new recreational beach is
established, at which time the March 15 through September 15 closure
would go into effect.
We will keep current biking access open via Swan Cove
Trail and will not propose an alternative bike route north to the
relocated public beach (from Wildlife Loop to Mallard (C Dike)).
The Service Road would continue to be open year-round to
hikers north to the refuge/National Seashore boundary.
A section of the Affected Environment (Chapter 3) on
cultural resources was inadvertently left out of the draft CCP/EIS.
This section, which has been coordinated with the Virginia Department
of Historic Resources, is included in the final CCP/EIS.
Other Features of Alternative B
Alternative B would continue established habitat and wildlife
management strategies but focus them in light of the new goals and
vision established by the CCP. The alternative balances habitat
management, public use and access, and administration of the refuge. We
would continue to preserve approximately 2,650 acres of wetland
impoundments, but make adjustments in accordance with a new impoundment
management plan that takes into account various factors, such as the
habitat needs of black ducks and monarch butterflies, climate change
and natural coastal processes, and relocated beach access and parking.
The refuge would continue to protect and enhance the wilderness
character of the 1974 proposed wilderness area, and there would be no
change in its size (1,300 acres) or location.
In recognition of the vulnerability of the current parking, the
refuge would develop and implement a site design plan for parking and
access to a new beach location, approximately 1.5 miles north of the
existing beach. We are committed to working with the National Park
Service (NPS) and others to future design, refine, and analyze beach
relocation infrastructure in a separate National Environmental Policy
Act document.
Over the next 15 years, the refuge would maintain and, where
possible, expand current hunting opportunities by including additional
species, extending hours, and providing special events. The refuge
would add mourning doves, light geese, and non-migratory Canada goose
hunting opportunities to the refuge's migratory bird hunting program.
Additionally, the refuge would allow migratory bird hunting on Federal
holidays within the Commonwealth of Virginia hunting seasons. The
refuge would also add turkeys to the big game hunting program and
pursue development of a trapping program for furbearers. The refuge
would continue sika hunting and would conduct research to identify a
desired population size.
The refuge would pursue partnerships to enhance land conservation,
environmental education, and interpretation on the Delmarva Peninsula.
The ``Chincoteague ponies'' have a strong cultural tie to the
community, and the refuge would implement a Chincoteague pony
management plan that meets multiple objectives: visitor viewing,
habitat management, and pony health. The refuge would allow grazing of
the current pony population, with a maximum pony herd size of 150, per
the management agreement with the Chincoteague Volunteer Fire Company.
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP/EIS as indicated under
ADDRESSES.
Comments
During the public comment period, a total of 236 emails and 94
letters were received, including official comments from the town of
Chincoteague, the Chincoteague Chamber of Commerce, The Nature
Conservancy, NPS, Environmental Protection Agency, various departments
from the Commonwealth of Virginia, and other local interest groups. In
addition a petition was submitted supporting Alternative ``A plus,'' an
alternative with elements of both alternative A and B, with
approximately 600 individuals signing. Another petition supporting the
preferred alternative (alternative B) was submitted with 112
individuals signing. We held two public open house meetings in
Chincoteague, and additional meetings in Melfa, Virginia, and Pocomoke
City, Maryland. As part of the public involvement process, we held a
public hearing on June 26, 2014, in Chincoteague with 28 people
formally raising a variety of issues and concerns.
We evaluated all the letters and emails sent to us during that
comment period, along with comments recorded at our public hearing, and
addressed all substantive comments. A summary of those comments and our
responses to them is included in the final CCP/EIS as appendix R.
Next Steps
We will document the final decision in a record of decision, which
will be published in the Federal Register after a 30-day ``wait
period'' that begins when EPA announces this final CCP-EIS. For more
information, see EPA's Role in the EIS Process.
Dated: August 18, 2015.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-21925 Filed 9-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P