Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection-DHS/CBP-020 Export Information System (EIS) System of Records System of Records, 53019-53021 [2015-21674]
Download as PDF
53019
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 170
Wednesday, September 2, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2015–0053]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security U.S. Customs and Border
Protection—DHS/CBP–020 Export
Information System (EIS) System of
Records System of Records
Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security is giving concurrent notice for
the newly established ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and
Border Protection—DHS/CBP–020,
Export Information System, System of
Records’’ and this proposed rulemaking.
This system of records will collect and
maintain records on cargo exported
from the United States, as well as
information pertaining to the filer,
transmitter, exporter, U.S. Principal
Party in Interest (USPPI), freight
forwarder, shipper, consignee, other
U.S. authorized agent filing for the
USPPI, and individuals related to the
specific cargo that is the subject of the
export transaction. In accordance with
the Privacy Act of 1974 and this
proposed rulemaking, the Department of
Homeland Security concurrently
proposes to exempt portions of the
system of records from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative
enforcement requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2015–0053, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Sep 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Fax: 202–343–4010.
• Mail: Karen L. Neuman, Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions please contact: John
Connors (202–344–1610), CBP Privacy
Officer, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20229. For
privacy issues please contact: Karen L.
Neuman, (202–343–1717), Chief Privacy
Officer, Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) proposes to
establish a new DHS system of records
titled, ‘‘DHS/CBP–020 Export
Information System (EIS) System of
Records.’’ The system of records is used
by DHS/CBP to collect, use, and
maintain paper and electronic records
required to track, control, and process
cargo exported from the United States.
EIS allows CBP to enhance national
security, enforce U.S. law, and facilitate
legitimate international trade.
DHS is issuing this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to exempt this
system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act. This
system will be included in DHS’s
inventory of record systems. Elsewhere
in the Federal Register, CBP is
publishing a system of records notice
(SORN) for EIS because the exporting
community must report export data that
contains personally identifiable
information (PII) to CBP.
Subsection (a) of Section 343 of the
Trade Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 2071)
mandates that the Secretary of
Homeland Security (formerly the
Secretary of Treasury) collect cargo
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information ‘‘through an electronic data
interchange system,’’ prior to the
departure of the cargo from the United
States by any mode of commercial
transportation (see 19 U.S.C. 2071 note.)
Pursuant to statute, CBP promulgated a
regulation requiring pre-departure filing
of electronic information to allow CBP
to examine the data before cargo leaves
the United States (see Electronic
Information for Outward Cargo
Required in Advance of Departure (19
CFR 192.14)). CBP required exporters to
provide electronic cargo information
through the Automated Export System
(AES) to avoid redundancy as
specifically mandated by Congress (see
Mandatory Pre-Departure Filing of
Export Cargo Information Through the
Automated Export System, 73 FR 32466
(June 9, 2008)).
To comply with the regulation,
exporters must file the Electronic Export
Information (EEI), formerly the
Shipper’s Export Declaration (SED) 1
when the value of the commodity
classified under each individual
Schedule B number is over $2,500 or if
a validated export license is required to
export the commodity. The exporter is
responsible for preparing the EEI and
the carrier files it with CBP through the
AES or AES Direct (operated by the U.S.
Census Bureau). Cargo information
collected by CBP includes PII such as a
shipper’s name, address, and Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN). According
to the U.S. Census Bureau, in a standard
export transaction, it is the U.S.
Principal Party In Interest’s (USPPI)
responsibility to prepare the EEI.
However, the USPPI can give the freight
forwarder a power of attorney (POA) or
written statement (WA) authorizing
them to prepare and file the EEI on their
behalf. In a routed export transaction,
however, the Foreign Principal Party in
Interest (FPPI) must provide a POA or
WA to prepare the EEI to either the
USPPI or a U.S. Authorized Agent.
1 13 U.S.C. 301 (The Census Bureau root authority
to collect the SED, now EEI); pursuant to section
303, CBP (then U.S. Customs Service, Dept. of
Treasury) is required to develop an automated
system for collecting this export data. Through title
13, the Census Bureau holds stewardship of export
data. Under the Trade Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 2071
note), CBP is required to collect an export manifest
containing a declaration identifying the parties to
the transaction, a physical description of the
commodity, its quantity, mode of conveyance, and
ports of origin and destination. Through title 19,
CBP, similarly, holds stewardship of export data.
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
53020
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Internal Transaction Number
(ITN) or exemption citation must be
provided by the EEI filer to the carrier
when the goods are presented for
export. The carrier is responsible for
providing the ITN or exemption citation
to CBP. CBP Officers will verify that the
ITN or exemption citations clearly
stated on export documents and
provided to the carrier(s) within the
prescribed timeframes. The procedures
for filing vary by cargo type (vessel,
truck, air, or rail). The timeframes for
filing varies according to the method of
transportation for pre-departure filing
(State Department United States
Munitions List (USML) shipments, and
non-USML shipments).
DHS/CBP is publishing this system of
records notice to provide notice of the
records maintained by CBP concerning
individuals who participate in exporting
goods from the United States. CBP
previously published a Privacy Impact
Assessment (PIA) for EIS last year.2
Consistent with DHS’s informationsharing mission, information stored in
the DHS/CBP–020 EIS System of
Records may be shared with other DHS
components that have a need to know
the information to carry out their
national security, law enforcement,
immigration, intelligence, or other
homeland security functions. In
addition, information may be shared
with appropriate federal, state, local,
tribal, territorial, foreign, or
international government agencies or
other parties consistent with the routine
uses set forth in this SORN. In
particular, information may be shared
with the Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Industry and Science, and the
Department of State, Office of Defense
Trade Controls, relating to compliance
and enforcement of licenses issued by
these respective agencies concerning the
controlled nature or sensitive
technology present in the exported
commodities (e.g., certain central
processing unit designs, weapons
systems).
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the
means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and
disseminate personally identifiable
information. The Privacy Act applies to
information that is maintained in a
‘‘system of records.’’ A ‘‘system of
records’’ is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of
2 https://www.dhs.gov/publication/exportinformation-system-eis.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Sep 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
the individual or by some identifying
number, symbol, or other identifying
particular assigned to the individual. In
the Privacy Act, an individual is defined
to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents. As a matter of
policy, DHS extends administrative
Privacy Act protections to all persons
where systems of records maintain
information on U.S. citizens, lawful
permanent residents, and nonimmigrant aliens.
The Privacy Act allows government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption,
however, it must issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
the public the reasons why a particular
exemption is claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for DHS/CBP–020 Export Information
System, System of Records.
No exemption shall be asserted with
respect to information maintained in the
system as it relates to data submitted by
or on behalf of a person who travels
from the United States, nor shall an
exemption be asserted with respect to
the resulting determination (authorized
to travel, not authorized to travel,
pending).
Some information in DHS/CBP–020
EIS System of Records relates to official
DHS national security, law enforcement,
and intelligence activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required for
information pertaining to the accounting
of disclosures made from this system to
other law enforcement or intelligence
agencies (federal, state, local, foreign,
international, or tribal) in accordance
with the published routine uses or
statutory basis for disclosure pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b). The exemptions will
preclude subjects from frustrating
official national security, law
enforcement, or intelligence processes.
Disclosure of information to the subject
of the inquiry could also permit the
subject to avoid detection or
apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, where
compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of this system
and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may
be waived on a case by case basis.
A notice of system of records for DHS/
CBP–020 EIS System of Records is also
published in this issue of the Federal
Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat.
2135; (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add, at the end of appendix C to
part 5, paragraph 74 to read as follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act.
*
*
*
*
*
74. DHS/CBP–020 Export Information
System (EIS). A portion of the following
system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (e)(8), and (g)(1) pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), and from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
Further, no exemption shall be asserted with
respect to information maintained in the
system as it relates to data submitted by or
on behalf of a person who travels from the
United States and crosses the border, nor
shall an exemption be asserted with respect
to the resulting determination (approval or
denial). After conferring with the appropriate
component or agency, DHS may waive
applicable exemptions in appropriate
circumstances and where it would not appear
to interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of the systems from
which the information is recompiled or in
which it is contained. Exemptions from the
above particular subsections are justified, on
a case-by-case basis to be determined at the
time a request is made, when information in
this system of records is may impede a law
enforcement, intelligence activities and
national security investigation:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because making available to a
record subject the accounting of disclosures
from records concerning him or her would
specifically reveal any investigative interest
in the individual. Revealing this information
could reasonably be expected to compromise
ongoing efforts to investigate a violation of
U.S. law, including investigations of a known
or suspected terrorist, by notifying the record
subject that he or she is under investigation.
This information could also permit the
record subject to take measures to impede the
investigation, e.g., destroy evidence,
intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the
area to avoid or impede the investigation.
(b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because to require individual
notice of disclosure of information due to
compulsory legal process would pose an
impossible administrative burden on DHS
and other agencies and could alert the
subjects of counterterrorism or law
enforcement investigations to the fact of
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
those investigations when not previously
known.
(c) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: August 19, 2015.
Karen L. Neuman,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015–21674 Filed 9–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 51
[Doc. Number AMS–FV–14–0090, FV–15–
327]
U.S. Standards for Grades of Fresh
Fruits and Vegetables, Fruits and
Vegetables for Processing, Nuts, and
Specialty Crops
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) proposes revising
46 U.S. Standards for Grades of fresh
fruits and vegetables, fruits and
vegetables for processing, nuts, and
specialty crops by removing the
‘‘Unclassified’’ category from each
standard. This would bring these grade
standards in line with other recently
amended standards and current
terminology. This revision would
update the standards to more accurately
represent today’s marketing practices
and provide the industry with greater
flexibility.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
November 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
the Standardization Branch, Specialty
Crops Inspection Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, National Training and
Development Center, Riverside Business
Park, 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101,
Fredericksburg, VA 22406; Fax: (540)
361–1199, or on the web at:
www.regulations.gov. The current U.S.
Grade Standards for the 46 affected
commodities are available on the AMS
Web site at www.ams.usda.gov/
scistandardization. Comments should
reference the dates and page number of
this issue of the Federal Register.
Comments will be made available for
public inspection in the above office
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Sep 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
during regular business hours and can
also be viewed, as submitted, with any
personal information provided, on the
www.regulations.gov Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Olivia Vernon, Standardization Branch,
Specialty Crops Inspection Division, at
the address above or by telephone at
(540) 361–2743; fax (540) 361–1199; or,
email olivia.vernon@ams.usda.gov. The
current U.S. Standards for Grades are
available on the AMS Web site at
www.ams.usda.gov/scistandardization.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as
amended, directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture ‘‘to develop and
improve standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade and packaging, and
recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage
uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.’’ AMS is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official grade
standards available upon request. The
U.S. Standards for Grades of Fruits and
Vegetables not connected with Federal
Marketing Orders or U.S. import
requirements no longer appear in the
Code of Federal Regulations, but are
maintained by USDA, AMS, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, and are available on
the Internet at www.ams.usda.gov/
scihome.
AMS is revising these voluntary U.S.
standards for grades using the
procedures in Part 36, Title 7 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part
36).
Background
AMS proposes to eliminate the
‘‘Unclassified’’ section in 46 U.S. grade
standards that were issued under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946.
The fresh fruit and vegetable grade
standards covered by these proposed
changes are: Sweet anise, lima beans,
beets, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, celery,
cucumbers, endive, garlic, collard
greens or broccoli greens, mustard
greens and turnip greens, honey dew
and honey ball type melons, horseradish
roots, greenhouse leaf lettuce,
mushrooms, common green onions,
onion sets, parsnips, fresh peas,
southern peas, rhubarb, romaine,
bunched shallots, spinach plants,
summer squash, turnips or rutabagas,
dewberries and blackberries, American
grapes, juice grapes, Persian limes,
summer and fall pears, winter pears,
and raspberries.
The fresh fruit and vegetable for
processing grade standards covered by
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53021
these proposed changes are spinach,
berries, blueberries, red sour cherries for
manufacture, sweet cherries for canning
or freezing, cranberries for processing,
currants, raspberries, growers’ stock
strawberries for manufacture, and
washed and sorted strawberries for
freezing.
The nut and specialty crops grade
standards covered by these proposed
changes are: Brazil nuts in the shell, cut
peonies in the bud, and tomato plants.
AMS continually reviews all fruit,
vegetable, nut and specialty crop grade
standards to ensure their usefulness to
the industry. AMS has identified that
the ‘‘Unclassified’’ section needs to be
eliminated from the 46 aforementioned
U.S. Standards for Grade. The
‘‘Unclassified’’ category is not a grade
and only serves to show that no grade
has been applied to the lot. It is no
longer considered necessary.
This notice provides for a 60-day
comment period for interested parties to
comment on the proposed revisions in
the standards.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: August 28, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–21836 Filed 9–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service
7 CFR Part 504
RIN 0518–AA05
Changes to Fees and Payment
Methods
Agricultural Research Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This document proposes an
increase in the fees the Agricultural
Research Service’s (ARS) Patent Culture
Collection charges, and a revision of the
method of payment.
DATES: Submits comments on or before
November 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: See FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Kurtz, ARS—Budget and
Program Management Staff, George
Washington Carver Center, 5601
Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4–1106,
Beltsville, Maryland 20705, telephone:
(301) 504–4494, email: jeff.kurtz@
ars.usda.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53019-53021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21674]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 53019]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2015-0053]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection--DHS/CBP-020
Export Information System (EIS) System of Records System of Records
AGENCY: Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent
notice for the newly established ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S.
Customs and Border Protection--DHS/CBP-020, Export Information System,
System of Records'' and this proposed rulemaking. This system of
records will collect and maintain records on cargo exported from the
United States, as well as information pertaining to the filer,
transmitter, exporter, U.S. Principal Party in Interest (USPPI),
freight forwarder, shipper, consignee, other U.S. authorized agent
filing for the USPPI, and individuals related to the specific cargo
that is the subject of the export transaction. In accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974 and this proposed rulemaking, the Department of
Homeland Security concurrently proposes to exempt portions of the
system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act
because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement
requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2015-0053, by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-343-4010.
Mail: Karen L. Neuman, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
John Connors (202-344-1610), CBP Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20229. For privacy issues please contact: Karen L. Neuman, (202-343-
1717), Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) proposes to establish a new DHS system of records
titled, ``DHS/CBP-020 Export Information System (EIS) System of
Records.'' The system of records is used by DHS/CBP to collect, use,
and maintain paper and electronic records required to track, control,
and process cargo exported from the United States. EIS allows CBP to
enhance national security, enforce U.S. law, and facilitate legitimate
international trade.
DHS is issuing this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to exempt this
system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act. This
system will be included in DHS's inventory of record systems. Elsewhere
in the Federal Register, CBP is publishing a system of records notice
(SORN) for EIS because the exporting community must report export data
that contains personally identifiable information (PII) to CBP.
Subsection (a) of Section 343 of the Trade Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C.
2071) mandates that the Secretary of Homeland Security (formerly the
Secretary of Treasury) collect cargo information ``through an
electronic data interchange system,'' prior to the departure of the
cargo from the United States by any mode of commercial transportation
(see 19 U.S.C. 2071 note.) Pursuant to statute, CBP promulgated a
regulation requiring pre-departure filing of electronic information to
allow CBP to examine the data before cargo leaves the United States
(see Electronic Information for Outward Cargo Required in Advance of
Departure (19 CFR 192.14)). CBP required exporters to provide
electronic cargo information through the Automated Export System (AES)
to avoid redundancy as specifically mandated by Congress (see Mandatory
Pre-Departure Filing of Export Cargo Information Through the Automated
Export System, 73 FR 32466 (June 9, 2008)).
To comply with the regulation, exporters must file the Electronic
Export Information (EEI), formerly the Shipper's Export Declaration
(SED) \1\ when the value of the commodity classified under each
individual Schedule B number is over $2,500 or if a validated export
license is required to export the commodity. The exporter is
responsible for preparing the EEI and the carrier files it with CBP
through the AES or AES Direct (operated by the U.S. Census Bureau).
Cargo information collected by CBP includes PII such as a shipper's
name, address, and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). According to
the U.S. Census Bureau, in a standard export transaction, it is the
U.S. Principal Party In Interest's (USPPI) responsibility to prepare
the EEI. However, the USPPI can give the freight forwarder a power of
attorney (POA) or written statement (WA) authorizing them to prepare
and file the EEI on their behalf. In a routed export transaction,
however, the Foreign Principal Party in Interest (FPPI) must provide a
POA or WA to prepare the EEI to either the USPPI or a U.S. Authorized
Agent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 13 U.S.C. 301 (The Census Bureau root authority to collect
the SED, now EEI); pursuant to section 303, CBP (then U.S. Customs
Service, Dept. of Treasury) is required to develop an automated
system for collecting this export data. Through title 13, the Census
Bureau holds stewardship of export data. Under the Trade Act of 2002
(19 U.S.C. 2071 note), CBP is required to collect an export manifest
containing a declaration identifying the parties to the transaction,
a physical description of the commodity, its quantity, mode of
conveyance, and ports of origin and destination. Through title 19,
CBP, similarly, holds stewardship of export data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53020]]
The Internal Transaction Number (ITN) or exemption citation must be
provided by the EEI filer to the carrier when the goods are presented
for export. The carrier is responsible for providing the ITN or
exemption citation to CBP. CBP Officers will verify that the ITN or
exemption citations clearly stated on export documents and provided to
the carrier(s) within the prescribed timeframes. The procedures for
filing vary by cargo type (vessel, truck, air, or rail). The timeframes
for filing varies according to the method of transportation for pre-
departure filing (State Department United States Munitions List (USML)
shipments, and non-USML shipments).
DHS/CBP is publishing this system of records notice to provide
notice of the records maintained by CBP concerning individuals who
participate in exporting goods from the United States. CBP previously
published a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for EIS last year.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.dhs.gov/publication/export-information-system-eis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with DHS's information-sharing mission, information
stored in the DHS/CBP-020 EIS System of Records may be shared with
other DHS components that have a need to know the information to carry
out their national security, law enforcement, immigration,
intelligence, or other homeland security functions. In addition,
information may be shared with appropriate federal, state, local,
tribal, territorial, foreign, or international government agencies or
other parties consistent with the routine uses set forth in this SORN.
In particular, information may be shared with the Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Science, and the Department of State,
Office of Defense Trade Controls, relating to compliance and
enforcement of licenses issued by these respective agencies concerning
the controlled nature or sensitive technology present in the exported
commodities (e.g., certain central processing unit designs, weapons
systems).
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate personally
identifiable information. The Privacy Act applies to information that
is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a
group of any records under the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to
the individual. In the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to
encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. As a matter of
policy, DHS extends administrative Privacy Act protections to all
persons where systems of records maintain information on U.S. citizens,
lawful permanent residents, and non-immigrant aliens.
The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is
claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for DHS/CBP-020 Export Information System, System of Records.
No exemption shall be asserted with respect to information
maintained in the system as it relates to data submitted by or on
behalf of a person who travels from the United States, nor shall an
exemption be asserted with respect to the resulting determination
(authorized to travel, not authorized to travel, pending).
Some information in DHS/CBP-020 EIS System of Records relates to
official DHS national security, law enforcement, and intelligence
activities. These exemptions are needed to protect information relating
to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to
these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required for
information pertaining to the accounting of disclosures made from this
system to other law enforcement or intelligence agencies (federal,
state, local, foreign, international, or tribal) in accordance with the
published routine uses or statutory basis for disclosure pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(b). The exemptions will preclude subjects from frustrating
official national security, law enforcement, or intelligence processes.
Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry could also
permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, where compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this
system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis.
A notice of system of records for DHS/CBP-020 EIS System of Records
is also published in this issue of the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; (6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Add, at the end of appendix C to part 5, paragraph 74 to read as
follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act.
* * * * *
74. DHS/CBP-020 Export Information System (EIS). A portion of
the following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3),
(e)(8), and (g)(1) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), and from 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). Further, no
exemption shall be asserted with respect to information maintained
in the system as it relates to data submitted by or on behalf of a
person who travels from the United States and crosses the border,
nor shall an exemption be asserted with respect to the resulting
determination (approval or denial). After conferring with the
appropriate component or agency, DHS may waive applicable exemptions
in appropriate circumstances and where it would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of
the systems from which the information is recompiled or in which it
is contained. Exemptions from the above particular subsections are
justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, when information in this system of records is may
impede a law enforcement, intelligence activities and national
security investigation:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
making available to a record subject the accounting of disclosures
from records concerning him or her would specifically reveal any
investigative interest in the individual. Revealing this information
could reasonably be expected to compromise ongoing efforts to
investigate a violation of U.S. law, including investigations of a
known or suspected terrorist, by notifying the record subject that
he or she is under investigation. This information could also permit
the record subject to take measures to impede the investigation,
e.g., destroy evidence, intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the
area to avoid or impede the investigation.
(b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because to
require individual notice of disclosure of information due to
compulsory legal process would pose an impossible administrative
burden on DHS and other agencies and could alert the subjects of
counterterrorism or law enforcement investigations to the fact of
[[Page 53021]]
those investigations when not previously known.
(c) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy
Act.
Dated: August 19, 2015.
Karen L. Neuman,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-21674 Filed 9-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P