Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 52179-52182 [2015-20959]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2015–17–17 Pratt & Whitney: Amendment
39–18250 ; Docket No. FAA–2014–1130;
Directorate Identifier 2015–NE–04–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective October 2, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Pratt & Whitney
(PW) PW4164–1D, PW4168–1D, PW4168A–
1D and PW4170 engines; and all PW4164,
PW4168, and PW4168A turbofan engines that
have incorporated either PW Service Bulletin
(SB) No. PW4G–100–72–214, dated
December 15, 2011 or PW SB No. PW4G–
100–72–219, Revision 1, dated October 5,
2011.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by fuel nozzle-tofuel supply manifold interface fuel leaks. We
are issuing this AD to prevent fuel leaks
which could result in engine fire and damage
to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(1) Within 800 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, and within every
800 flight hours since last inspection
thereafter, inspect all fuel nozzle-to-fuel
supply manifold interfaces for evidence of
fuel leaks, soot, and coke formation. Use the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, of PW
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. PW4G–100–
A73–44, Revision 1, dated February 12, 2015
to do the inspections.
(2) Replace hardware that fails an
inspection. Use the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part A, of PW ASB No. PW4G–
100–A73–44, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2015 to do the replacement.
(f) Mandatory Terminating Action
As terminating action to the repetitive
inspection requirements in paragraph (e)(1)
of this AD do the following:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:56 Aug 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
(1) Inspect all fuel nozzle-to-fuel supply
manifold interfaces for fuel leaks, soot, and
coke formation, replace hardware that fails
inspection, and re-torque all fuel nozzle-tofuel supply manifold B-nuts as follows:
(i) For engines with fewer than 1,500
cycles on the effective date of this AD, before
accumulating another 650 cycles, not to
exceed 1,900 cycles.
(ii) For engines with 1,500 cycles or more,
but less than 2,500 cycles on the effective
date of this AD, before accumulating another
400 cycles, not to exceed 2,700 cycles.
(iii) For engines with 2,500 cycles or more
on the effective date of this AD, before
accumulating another 200 cycles.
(2) Use the Accomplishment Instructions,
Parts B through E, of PW ASB No. PW4G–
100–A73–44, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2015 to do the inspection, replacement, and
retorqueing.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(g) Credit for Previous Action
Federal Aviation Administration
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraphs (e) and (f) of
this AD, if the actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD, using the
procedures specified in PW ASB No. PW4G–
100–A73–44, dated October 10, 2014 or
Special Instruction 129F–14.
14 CFR Part 39
(h) Definition
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
§ 39.13
52179
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
For the purpose of this AD ‘‘cycles’’ is
defined as cycles since new or cycles since
last torque application to the B-nuts on the
fuel nozzle installation.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Katheryn Malatek, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7747; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: katheryn.malatek@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pratt & Whitney (PW) ASB No. PW4G–
100–A73–44, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For PW service information identified
in this AD, contact Pratt & Whitney, 400
Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone:
860–565–8770; fax: 860–565–4503.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
August 18, 2015.
Diane S. Romanosky,
Acting Directorate Manager, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–21204 Filed 8–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0823; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–211–AD; Amendment
39–18249; AD 2015–17–16]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
results of a design review indicating that
the burst pressure of the flexible hose,
used to vent oxygen from the highpressure relief valve of the oxygen
cylinder overboard, was lower than the
opening pressure of the high-pressure
relief valve, which could cause the
flexible hose to burst before it can vent
the excess oxygen overboard. This AD
requires replacing the oxygen hose
assembly with a new, improved
assembly. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the accumulation of oxygen in
an enclosed space, which could result
in an uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire if an
ignition source is nearby.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
October 2, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2015-0823 or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
52180
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400
ˆ
´
Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–
5000; fax 514–855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0823.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone (516) 228–7318;
fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model
CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 &
440) airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on April 13, 2015
(80 FR 19570).
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, has issued
Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–
2014–36, dated October 17, 2014
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The MCAI
states:
Design review found that the burst
pressure of the flexible hose, used to vent
oxygen from the high-pressure relief valve of
the oxygen cylinder overboard, is lower than
the opening pressure of the high-pressure
relief valve. This could cause the flexible
hose to burst before it is able to vent the
excess oxygen overboard. If an ignition
source is present, the accumulation of oxygen
in an enclosed space may result in an
uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the
replacement of the oxygen hose assembly
with a new design oxygen hose assembly.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:56 Aug 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2015-08230002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM (80 FR 19570,
April 13, 2015) and the FAA’s response
to each comment.
Request To Extend the Compliance
Time
Mesa Airlines asked that the
compliance time specified in paragraph
(g) of the NPRM (80 FR 19570, April 13,
2015) be changed. Mesa Airlines stated
that the current compliance time would
immediately ground airplanes on the
effective date of the AD. Mesa Airlines
asked that we change the compliance
time to ‘‘Within 6,000 flight hours, or
within 44 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first.’’
Mesa Airlines added that this would
allow for scheduling with heavy
maintenance inspection and parts
procurement.
We partially agree with the request.
We have changed the compliance time
in paragraph (g) of this AD to ‘‘Within
5,800 flight hours or 44 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first.’’ This change matches the
compliance time in the MCAI, and will
allow operators to remain in
compliance.
We do not agree that the compliance
time should be extended to ‘‘Within
6,000 flight hours, or within 44 months
after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first’’. After
considering all the available
information, we have determined that
the compliance time represents an
appropriate interval of time in which
the required actions can be performed in
a timely manner within the affected
fleet, while still maintaining an
adequate level of safety. In developing
an appropriate compliance time, we
considered the safety implications, parts
availability, and normal maintenance
schedules for timely accomplishment of
the replacement. However, if additional
data are presented that would justify a
longer compliance time, we may
consider further rulemaking on this
issue. We have not changed the AD in
this regard.
Request To Refer To Revised Service
Information
Richard Rupslauskas asked that we
include Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R–35–018, Revision A, in the NPRM
(80 FR 19570, April 13, 2015), and give
credit for Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R–35–018, dated May 21, 2013. The
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commenter stated that Revision A
should be distributed very soon, and
added that no additional work will be
required on aircraft that have had the
modification incorporated using the
original issue of the service information.
The commenter added that the NPRM
should recognize that either the original
or Revision A of the service information
is acceptable as a method of
compliance.
We do not agree to reference
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–35–
018, Revision A, because that revision
has not yet been issued. However, after
Revision A is issued, affected operators
may request approval to use that
revision of the referenced service
bulletin as an alternative method of
compliance, under the provisions of
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Request To Include Parts Cost
Richard Rupslauskas stated that the
parts cost is $835 per airplane, and
added that since 575 airplanes are
affected, the total cost for parts is
$480,125.
We infer that the commenter wants
the parts cost included in the ‘‘Costs of
Compliance’’ section of this AD. We
agree to include the parts cost of $835
in that section. We have changed this
AD accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (80 FR
19570, April 13, 2015) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 19570,
April 13, 2015).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Bombardier has issued Service
Bulletin 601R–35–018, dated May 21,
2013. The service information describes
procedures for replacing the oxygen
hose assembly with a new, improved
assembly. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 575
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it takes about 2
work-hours per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD.
Required parts will cost about $835 per
product. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $577,875, or $1,005 per
airplane.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:56 Aug 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
52181
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
flexible hose to burst before it can vent the
excess oxygen overboard. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the accumulation of oxygen in
an enclosed space, which could result in an
uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire if an ignition
source is nearby.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2015-0823; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2015–17–16 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment
39–18249. Docket No. FAA–2015–0823;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–211–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective October 2, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 7003 and subsequent.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35, Oxygen.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by results of a
design review indicating that the burst
pressure of the flexible hose, used to vent
oxygen from the high-pressure relief valve of
the oxygen cylinder overboard, was lower
than the opening pressure of the highpressure relief valve, which could cause the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(g) Replacement
Within 5,800 flight hours or 44 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Replace all oxygen hose
assemblies having part number (P/N) 38026–
4–0280–000 with new, improved assemblies
having P/N 601R44045–1, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–35–018,
dated May 21, 2013.
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an oxygen hose assembly,
P/N 38026–4–0280–000, on any airplane.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170,
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by
the DAO, the approval must include the
DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–36, dated
October 17, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2015-0823-0002.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
52182
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–35–
018, dated May 21, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
17, 2015.
Kevin Hull,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–20959 Filed 8–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0455; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–006–AD; Amendment
39–18247; AD 2015–17–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
series airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports that during a full scale fatigue
test, several broken frames in certain
areas of the cargo compartment have
been found, especially on the cargo floor
support fittings and open tack holes on
the left-hand side. This AD requires a
rototest inspection of the open tack
holes and rivet holes at the cargo floor
support fittings of the fuselage,
including doing all applicable related
investigative actions, and repair if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracking in the open
tack holes and rivet holes at the cargo
floor support fittings of the fuselage,
which could affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:56 Aug 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
This AD becomes effective
October 2, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of October 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0455; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221. It is also available on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–0455.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Airbus Model A319, A320,
and A321 series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
July 23, 2014 (79 FR 42716).
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2013–0310, dated December
20, 2013 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Airbus
Model A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:
During a full scale fatigue test, several
broken frames in the cargo compartment area
between Frame (FR) 50 and FR 63, have been
found, especially on the cargo floor support
fittings and open tack holes on [the] left hand
side.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could affect the structural integrity
of the aeroplane.
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD requires repetitive inspections of
the frames in the cargo compartment area and
of the cargo floor support fittings and open
tack holes on the left hand (LH) side, and
depending on findings, the accomplishment
of applicable corrective action(s). This
[EASA] AD also requires a modification,
which constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspections required by this
[EASA] AD.
The actions in this AD include a rototest
inspection for cracking of the open tack
holes and rivet holes at the cargo floor
support fittings of the fuselage;
modification of the fuselage, including
doing all applicable related investigative
actions; and repair if necessary. Related
investigative actions include rotating
probe inspections for cracking of the
holes. You may examine the MCAI in
the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-04550002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM (79 FR 42716,
July 23, 2014) and the FAA’s response
to each comment.
Requests To Remove Service
Information Not Applicable to the U.S.
Fleet
Delta Air Lines (DAL), United
Airlines (UAL), and US Airways
requested that certain service
information be removed from the NPRM
(79 FR 42716, July 23, 2014) as it is not
applicable to the U.S. fleet.
DAL stated that Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1261, dated
December 21, 2012, which provides a
terminating modification for the
repetitive inspections specified in the
NPRM (79 FR 42716, July 23, 2014), is
one of eight structural modification
service bulletins required to operate
Model A320 airplanes beyond 48,000
flight cycles/96,000 flight hours
(referred to as extended service goal
(ESG)). DAL stated that Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1261, dated
December 21, 2012, does not affect DAL
or any other U.S. operator, since Airbus
only recognizes airplane effectivity for
those operators that have accomplished
this service bulletin (which can only be
purchased from Airbus) through ESG
embodiment.
UAL and US Airways stated that, in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD (79 FR
42716, July 23, 2014), modification of
the fuselage in accordance with Airbus
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 167 (Friday, August 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52179-52182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20959]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0823; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-211-AD;
Amendment 39-18249; AD 2015-17-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This AD was prompted by results of a design review
indicating that the burst pressure of the flexible hose, used to vent
oxygen from the high-pressure relief valve of the oxygen cylinder
overboard, was lower than the opening pressure of the high-pressure
relief valve, which could cause the flexible hose to burst before it
can vent the excess oxygen overboard. This AD requires replacing the
oxygen hose assembly with a new, improved assembly. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the accumulation of oxygen in an enclosed space, which
could result in an uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire if an ignition source
is nearby.
DATES: This AD becomes effective October 2, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 2,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2015-0823 or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
[[Page 52180]]
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier,
Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It
is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0823.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone (516) 228-7318; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on April 13, 2015 (80 FR 19570).
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2014-36, dated October 17, 2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-
2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The MCAI states:
Design review found that the burst pressure of the flexible
hose, used to vent oxygen from the high-pressure relief valve of the
oxygen cylinder overboard, is lower than the opening pressure of the
high-pressure relief valve. This could cause the flexible hose to
burst before it is able to vent the excess oxygen overboard. If an
ignition source is present, the accumulation of oxygen in an
enclosed space may result in an uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the replacement of the oxygen hose
assembly with a new design oxygen hose assembly.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2015-0823-0002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (80
FR 19570, April 13, 2015) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Extend the Compliance Time
Mesa Airlines asked that the compliance time specified in paragraph
(g) of the NPRM (80 FR 19570, April 13, 2015) be changed. Mesa Airlines
stated that the current compliance time would immediately ground
airplanes on the effective date of the AD. Mesa Airlines asked that we
change the compliance time to ``Within 6,000 flight hours, or within 44
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.''
Mesa Airlines added that this would allow for scheduling with heavy
maintenance inspection and parts procurement.
We partially agree with the request. We have changed the compliance
time in paragraph (g) of this AD to ``Within 5,800 flight hours or 44
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.''
This change matches the compliance time in the MCAI, and will allow
operators to remain in compliance.
We do not agree that the compliance time should be extended to
``Within 6,000 flight hours, or within 44 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first''. After considering all the
available information, we have determined that the compliance time
represents an appropriate interval of time in which the required
actions can be performed in a timely manner within the affected fleet,
while still maintaining an adequate level of safety. In developing an
appropriate compliance time, we considered the safety implications,
parts availability, and normal maintenance schedules for timely
accomplishment of the replacement. However, if additional data are
presented that would justify a longer compliance time, we may consider
further rulemaking on this issue. We have not changed the AD in this
regard.
Request To Refer To Revised Service Information
Richard Rupslauskas asked that we include Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601R-35-018, Revision A, in the NPRM (80 FR 19570, April 13,
2015), and give credit for Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-018,
dated May 21, 2013. The commenter stated that Revision A should be
distributed very soon, and added that no additional work will be
required on aircraft that have had the modification incorporated using
the original issue of the service information. The commenter added that
the NPRM should recognize that either the original or Revision A of the
service information is acceptable as a method of compliance.
We do not agree to reference Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-
018, Revision A, because that revision has not yet been issued.
However, after Revision A is issued, affected operators may request
approval to use that revision of the referenced service bulletin as an
alternative method of compliance, under the provisions of paragraph
(i)(1) of this AD.
Request To Include Parts Cost
Richard Rupslauskas stated that the parts cost is $835 per
airplane, and added that since 575 airplanes are affected, the total
cost for parts is $480,125.
We infer that the commenter wants the parts cost included in the
``Costs of Compliance'' section of this AD. We agree to include the
parts cost of $835 in that section. We have changed this AD
accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (80 FR 19570, April 13, 2015) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 19570, April 13, 2015).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 601R-35-018, dated May 21,
2013. The service information describes procedures for replacing the
oxygen hose assembly with a new, improved assembly. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
[[Page 52181]]
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 575 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it takes about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. Required parts will cost
about $835 per product. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $577,875, or $1,005 per airplane.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2015-0823; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2015-17-16 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-18249. Docket No. FAA-
2015-0823; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-211-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective October 2, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by results of a design review indicating
that the burst pressure of the flexible hose, used to vent oxygen
from the high-pressure relief valve of the oxygen cylinder
overboard, was lower than the opening pressure of the high-pressure
relief valve, which could cause the flexible hose to burst before it
can vent the excess oxygen overboard. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the accumulation of oxygen in an enclosed space, which could
result in an uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire if an ignition source is
nearby.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Replacement
Within 5,800 flight hours or 44 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first: Replace all oxygen hose
assemblies having part number (P/N) 38026-4-0280-000 with new,
improved assemblies having P/N 601R44045-1, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-
018, dated May 21, 2013.
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
oxygen hose assembly, P/N 38026-4-0280-000, on any airplane.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-
7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.
(j) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2014-36, dated October 17, 2014,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-
2015-0823-0002.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
[[Page 52182]]
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-018, dated May 21, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2015.
Kevin Hull,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-20959 Filed 8-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P