Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 15, 48285-48286 [2015-19822]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 155 / Wednesday, August 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
2. Revise section 1823.7001 to read as
follows:
■
1823.7001 NASA solicitation provisions
and contract clauses.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
1852.223–70 Safety and health measures
and mishap reporting.
(a) Insert the clause at 1852.223–70,
Safety and Health Measures and Mishap
Reporting, in solicitations and contracts
above the simplified acquisition
threshold when the work will be
conducted completely or partly on
federally-controlled facilities.
(b) The clause prescribed in paragraph
(a) of this section may be excluded, with
the approval of the installation
official(s) responsible for matters of
safety and occupational health.
(c) The contracting officer shall insert
the provision at 1852.223–73, Safety
and Health Plan, in solicitations
containing the clause at 1852.223–70.
This provision may be modified to
identify specific information that is to
be included in the plan. After receiving
the concurrence of the center safety and
occupational health official(s), the
contracting officer shall include the
plan in any resulting contract. Insert the
provision with its Alternate I, in
Invitations for Bid containing the clause
at 1852.223–70.
(d)(1)The contracting officer shall
insert the clause at 1852.223–75, Major
Breach of Safety or Security, in all
solicitations and contracts with
estimated values of $500,000 or more,
unless waived at a level above the
contracting officer with the concurrence
of the project manager and the
installation official(s) responsible for
matters of security, export control,
safety, and occupational health.
(2) Insert the clause with its Alternate
I if—
(i) The solicitation or contract is with
an educational or other nonprofit
institution and contains the termination
clause at FAR 52.249–5; or
(ii) The solicitation or contract is for
commercial items and contains the
clause at FAR 52.212–4.
(3) For contracts with estimated
values below $500,000, use of the clause
is optional.
(e) For all solicitations and contracts
exceeding the micro-purchase threshold
that do not include the clause at
1852.223–70, Safety and Health, the
contracting officer shall insert the clause
at 1852.223–72, Safety and Health
(Short Form).
As prescribed in 1823.7004(1)(a),
insert the following clause:
PART 1852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. The authority citation for part 1852
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(a) and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Aug 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
4. Revise section 1852.223–70 to read
as follows:
Safety and Health Measures and Mishap
Reporting
(XX/XX)
(a) Safety is the freedom from those
conditions that can cause death, injury,
occupational illness, damage to or loss of
equipment or property, or damage to the
environment. NASA’s safety priority is to
protect: (1) The public, (2) astronauts and
pilots, (3) the NASA workforce (including
contractor employees working on NASA
contracts), and (4) high-value equipment and
property.
(b) The Contractor shall take all reasonable
safety and occupational health measures in
performing this contract. The Contractor
shall maintain an effective worksite safety
and health program with organized and
systematic methods to—
(1) Comply with Federal, State, and local
safety and occupational health laws and with
the safety and occupational health
requirements of this contract;
(2) Describe and assign the responsibilities
of managers, supervisors, and employees;
(3) Inspect regularly for and identify,
evaluate, prevent, and control hazards;
(4) Orient and train employees to eliminate
or avoid hazards; and
(5) Periodically review the program’s
effectiveness. Authorized Government
representatives shall have access to and the
right to examine the work site and related
records under this contract in order to
determine the adequacy of the Contractor’s
safety and occupational health measures.
(c) The Contractor shall take, or cause to
be taken, any other safety, and occupational
health measures the Contracting Officer may
reasonably direct. To the extent that the
Contractor may be entitled to an equitable
adjustment for those measures under the
terms and conditions of this contract, the
equitable adjustment shall be determined
pursuant to the procedures of the changes
clause of this contract; provided, that no
adjustment shall be made under this Safety
and Health clause for any change for which
an equitable adjustment is expressly
provided under any other clause of the
contract.
(d) The Contractor shall immediately notify
the Contracting Officer or a designee of any
Type A, B, C, or D Mishap, or close calls as
defined in NASA Procedural Requirement
(NPR) 8621.1, Mishap and Close Call
Reporting, Investigating, and Recordkeeping.
In addition, service contractors (excluding
construction contracts) shall provide
quarterly reports specifying lost-time
frequency rate, number of lost-time injuries,
exposure, and accident/incident dollar
losses.
(e) The Contractor shall cooperate with any
Government-authorized investigation of Type
A, B, C, or D Mishaps, or Close Calls reported
pursuant to paragraph (d) of this clause by
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48285
providing access to employees; and relevant
information in the possession of the
Contractor regarding the mishap or close call.
(f)(1) The Contracting Officer may notify
the Contractor in writing of any
noncompliance with the health and safety
requirements of this contract and specify
corrective actions to be taken. When the
Contracting Officer becomes aware of
noncompliance that may pose a serious or
imminent danger to safety and health of the
public, astronauts and pilots, the NASA
workforce (including contractor employees
working on NASA contracts), or high value
mission critical equipment or property, the
Contracting Officer shall notify the
Contractor orally, with written confirmation.
The Contractor shall promptly take corrective
action.
(2) If the Contractor fails or refuses to
institute prompt corrective action, the
Contracting Officer may invoke the stop-work
order clause in this contract. In addition to
other remedies available to the
Government—
(i) The Contractor shall remove and replace
any Contractor or subcontractor personnel
performing under this contract who fail to
comply with or violate applicable
requirements of this clause; and
(ii) The Contractor’s failure to comply with
the requirements of this clause may be
included in the appropriate databases of past
performance and may be considered in any
responsibility determination or evaluation of
past performance.
(g) The Contractor shall insert the
substance of this clause, including this
paragraph (g) in all subcontracts above the
simplified acquisition threshold when the
work will be conducted completely or partly
on federally-controlled facilities.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2015–19772 Filed 8–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648–BE93
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 15
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The Gulf of Mexico (Gulf)
Fishery Management Council (Council)
has submitted Amendment 15 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the
Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
48286
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 155 / Wednesday, August 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(FMP) for review, approval, and
implementation by NMFS. Amendment
15 includes actions to revise the
maximum sustainable yield (MSY),
overfishing threshold, and overfished
threshold definitions and values for
three species of penaeid shrimp, and to
revise the FMP framework procedures.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on Amendment 15, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2015–0097’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150097, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Susan Gerhart, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South,
St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of Amendment 15,
which includes an environmental
assessment, a Regulatory Flexibility Act
analysis, and a regulatory impact
review, may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office Web site at
https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_
fisheries/gulf_fisheries/shrimp/2015/
Am%2015/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727–824–
5305, or email: Susan.Gerhart@
noaa.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires each
regional fishery management council to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Aug 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
submit any FMP or amendment to
NMFS for review and approval, partial
approval, or disapproval. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires
that NMFS, upon receiving a plan or
amendment, publish an announcement
in the Federal Register notifying the
public that the plan or amendment is
available for review and comment.
The FMP being revised by
Amendment 15 was prepared by the
Council and implemented through
regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Background
Amendment 15 would revise the
MSY, overfishing threshhold, and the
overfished threshold definitions and
values for brown, white, and pink
shrimp in the Gulf. MSY is the largest
average catch that can continuously be
taken from a stock under existing
environmental conditions. Overfishing
occurs when the rate of removal is too
high and jeopardizes the capacity of a
stock or stock complex to produce MSY
on a continuing basis. A stock or stock
complex is considered overfished when
its biomass has declined below the
capacity of the stock or stock complex
to produce MSY on a continuing basis.
The criteria and values for MSY,
overfishing threshold, and overfished
threshold for penaeid shrimp were
established in Amendment 13 to the
FMP (71 FR 56039, September 26,
2006). Historically, Gulf penaeid shrimp
stocks were assessed with a virtual
population analysis (VPA), which
reported output in terms of number of
parents. However, the 2007 pink shrimp
stock assessment VPA incorrectly
determined pink shrimp were
undergoing overfishing because the
model could not accommodate low
effort. In 2009, NMFS stock assessment
analysts determined that the stock
synthesis model was the best choice for
modeling Gulf shrimp populations. The
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee accepted the stock synthesis
model as best scientific information
available and Amendment 15 modifies
the stock status determination criteria to
match the biomass-based outputs of the
stock synthesis model. These revisions
to the penaeid shrimp stock status
criteria are expected to have little to no
change in the biological, physical, or
ecological environments because these
changes are only to the stock status
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
reference points and will not have a
direct impact on the actual harvest of
penaeid shrimp.
Amendment 15 would also revise the
FMP framework procedures. Framework
procedures for a FMP allow changes in
specific management measures and
parameters that can be made more
efficiently than changes made through a
FMP plan amendment. Amendment 15
would make changes to the framework
procedures to allow for modification of
accountability measures under the
standard documentation process of the
open framework procedure. Also,
outdated terminology, such as ‘‘total
allowable catch’’ would be removed.
Additionally, the phrase ‘‘transfer at sea
provisions’’ would be removed from the
list of framework procedures because
this phrase was inadvertently included
in the final rule for the Generic Annual
Catch Limit Amendment (76 FR 82044,
December 29, 2011).
A proposed rule that would
implement measures outlined in
Amendment 15 has been drafted. In
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, NMFS is evaluating the proposed
rule to determine whether it is
consistent with the FMP, the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable law.
If that determination is affirmative,
NMFS will publish the proposed rule in
the Federal Register for public review
and comment.
Consideration of Public Comments
The Council has submitted
Amendment 15 for Secretarial review,
approval, and implementation.
Comments received by October 13,
2015, whether specifically directed to
the amendment or the proposed rule,
will be considered by NMFS in its
decision to approve, disapprove, or
partially approve the amendment.
Comments received after that date will
not be considered by NMFS in this
decision. All comments received by
NMFS on the amendment or the
proposed rule during their respective
comment periods will be addressed in
the final rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 7, 2015.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–19822 Filed 8–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 155 (Wednesday, August 12, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48285-48286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19822]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648-BE93
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 15
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) Fishery Management Council (Council)
has submitted Amendment 15 to the Fishery Management Plan for the
Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
[[Page 48286]]
(FMP) for review, approval, and implementation by NMFS. Amendment 15
includes actions to revise the maximum sustainable yield (MSY),
overfishing threshold, and overfished threshold definitions and values
for three species of penaeid shrimp, and to revise the FMP framework
procedures.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on Amendment 15, identified by
``NOAA-NMFS-2015-0097'' by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0097, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Susan Gerhart, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Electronic copies of Amendment 15, which includes an environmental
assessment, a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, and a regulatory
impact review, may be obtained from the Southeast Regional Office Web
site at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_fisheries/gulf_fisheries/shrimp/2015/Am%2015/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727-824-
5305, or email: Susan.Gerhart@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires each regional
fishery management council to submit any FMP or amendment to NMFS for
review and approval, partial approval, or disapproval. The Magnuson-
Stevens Act also requires that NMFS, upon receiving a plan or
amendment, publish an announcement in the Federal Register notifying
the public that the plan or amendment is available for review and
comment.
The FMP being revised by Amendment 15 was prepared by the Council
and implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Background
Amendment 15 would revise the MSY, overfishing threshhold, and the
overfished threshold definitions and values for brown, white, and pink
shrimp in the Gulf. MSY is the largest average catch that can
continuously be taken from a stock under existing environmental
conditions. Overfishing occurs when the rate of removal is too high and
jeopardizes the capacity of a stock or stock complex to produce MSY on
a continuing basis. A stock or stock complex is considered overfished
when its biomass has declined below the capacity of the stock or stock
complex to produce MSY on a continuing basis.
The criteria and values for MSY, overfishing threshold, and
overfished threshold for penaeid shrimp were established in Amendment
13 to the FMP (71 FR 56039, September 26, 2006). Historically, Gulf
penaeid shrimp stocks were assessed with a virtual population analysis
(VPA), which reported output in terms of number of parents. However,
the 2007 pink shrimp stock assessment VPA incorrectly determined pink
shrimp were undergoing overfishing because the model could not
accommodate low effort. In 2009, NMFS stock assessment analysts
determined that the stock synthesis model was the best choice for
modeling Gulf shrimp populations. The Council's Scientific and
Statistical Committee accepted the stock synthesis model as best
scientific information available and Amendment 15 modifies the stock
status determination criteria to match the biomass-based outputs of the
stock synthesis model. These revisions to the penaeid shrimp stock
status criteria are expected to have little to no change in the
biological, physical, or ecological environments because these changes
are only to the stock status reference points and will not have a
direct impact on the actual harvest of penaeid shrimp.
Amendment 15 would also revise the FMP framework procedures.
Framework procedures for a FMP allow changes in specific management
measures and parameters that can be made more efficiently than changes
made through a FMP plan amendment. Amendment 15 would make changes to
the framework procedures to allow for modification of accountability
measures under the standard documentation process of the open framework
procedure. Also, outdated terminology, such as ``total allowable
catch'' would be removed. Additionally, the phrase ``transfer at sea
provisions'' would be removed from the list of framework procedures
because this phrase was inadvertently included in the final rule for
the Generic Annual Catch Limit Amendment (76 FR 82044, December 29,
2011).
A proposed rule that would implement measures outlined in Amendment
15 has been drafted. In accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS
is evaluating the proposed rule to determine whether it is consistent
with the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law. If
that determination is affirmative, NMFS will publish the proposed rule
in the Federal Register for public review and comment.
Consideration of Public Comments
The Council has submitted Amendment 15 for Secretarial review,
approval, and implementation. Comments received by October 13, 2015,
whether specifically directed to the amendment or the proposed rule,
will be considered by NMFS in its decision to approve, disapprove, or
partially approve the amendment. Comments received after that date will
not be considered by NMFS in this decision. All comments received by
NMFS on the amendment or the proposed rule during their respective
comment periods will be addressed in the final rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 7, 2015.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-19822 Filed 8-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P