HEARTH Act Approval of Seminole Tribe of Florida Regulations, 47949-47950 [2015-19604]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and current expiration date.
III. Request for Comments
To comply with the public
consultation process, on March 25,
2015, we published a Federal Register
notice (80 FR 15808) announcing our
intent to submit this information
collection to OMB for approval. In that
notice we solicited public comments for
60 days, ending on May 26, 2015. The
USGS did not receive any comments.
Therefore, we have not changed this
collection.
We again invite comments concerning
this IC on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the agency to perform its duties,
including whether the information is
useful; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden on the respondents, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Please note that any
comments submitted in response to this
notice are a matter of public record.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publically available at any
time. While you can ask OMB in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that will be
done.
Douglas A. Howard,
Associate Program Coordinator, National
Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program.
BILLING CODE 4311–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
HEARTH Act Approval of Seminole
Tribe of Florida Regulations
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
On January 8, 2015, the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved
the Seminole Tribe of Florida leasing
regulations under the HEARTH Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Aug 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH (Helping Expedite and
Advance Responsible Tribal
Homeownership) Act of 2012 (the Act)
makes a voluntary, alternative land
leasing process available to tribes, by
amending the Indian Long-Term Leasing
Act of 1955, 25 U.S.C. 415. The Act
authorizes tribes to negotiate and enter
into agricultural and business leases of
tribal trust lands with a primary term of
25 years, and up to two renewal terms
of 25 years each, without the approval
of the Secretary of the Interior. The Act
also authorizes tribes to enter into leases
for residential, recreational, religious or
educational purposes for a primary term
of up to 75 years without the approval
of the Secretary. Participating tribes
develop tribal leasing regulations,
including an environmental review
process, and then must obtain the
Secretary’s approval of those regulations
prior to entering into leases. The Act
requires the Secretary to approve tribal
regulations if the tribal regulations are
consistent with the Department’s leasing
regulations at 25 CFR part 162 and
provide for an environmental review
process that meets requirements set
forth in the Act. This notice announces
that the Secretary, through the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved
the tribal regulations for the Seminole
Tribe of Florida.
II. Federal Preemption of State and
Local Taxes
[FR Doc. 2015–19503 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
With this approval, the Tribe is
authorized to enter into the following
type of leases without BIA approval:
Business and residential ordinances.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Morales, Office of Trust
Services—Division of Realty, Bureau of
Indian Affairs; Telephone (202) 768–
4166; Email cynthia.morales@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Department’s regulations
governing the surface leasing of trust
and restricted Indian lands specify that,
subject to applicable Federal law,
permanent improvements on leased
land, leasehold or possessory interests,
and activities under the lease are not
subject to State and local taxation and
may be subject to taxation by the Indian
tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR
162.017. As explained further in the
preamble to the final regulations, the
Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development,
self-determination, and tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72,440, 72447–48
(December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of
State law in the field of Indian leasing
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47949
and the taxation of lease-related
interests and activities applies with
equal force to leases entered into under
tribal leasing regulations approved by
the Federal government pursuant to the
HEARTH Act.
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization
Act, 25 U.S.C 465, preempts State and
local taxation of permanent
improvements on trust land.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724
F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411
U.S. 145 (1973)). In addition, as
explained in the preamble to the revised
leasing regulations at 25 CFR part 162,
Federal courts have applied a balancing
test to determine whether State and
local taxation of non-Indians on the
reservation is preempted. White
Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448
U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker
balancing test, which is conducted
against a backdrop of ‘‘traditional
notions of Indian self-government,’’
requires a particularized examination of
the relevant State, Federal, and tribal
interests. We hereby adopt the Bracker
analysis from the preamble to the
surface leasing regulations, 77 FR at
72,447–48, as supplemented by the
analysis below.
The strong Federal and tribal interests
against State and local taxation of
improvements, leaseholds, and
activities on land leased under the
Department’s leasing regulations apply
equally to improvements, leaseholds,
and activities on land leased pursuant to
tribal leasing regulations approved
under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s
overarching intent was to ‘‘allow tribes
to exercise greater control over their
own land, support self-determination,
and eliminate bureaucratic delays that
stand in the way of homeownership and
economic development in tribal
communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682
(May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was
intended to afford tribes ‘‘flexibility to
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
[tribes] to approve leases quickly and
efficiently.’’ Id. at 5–6.
Assessment of State and local taxes
would obstruct these express Federal
policies supporting tribal economic
development and self-determination,
and also threaten substantial tribal
interests in effective tribal government,
economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills
Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring)
(determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
Federal Government is to render Tribes
more self-sufficient, and better
positioned to fund their own sovereign
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
47950
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices
functions, rather than relying on Federal
funding’’). The additional costs of State
and local taxation have a chilling effect
on potential lessees, as well as on a tribe
that, as a result, might refrain from
exercising its own sovereign right to
impose a tribal tax to support its
infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043–44
(finding that State and local taxes
greatly discourage tribes from raising tax
revenue from the same sources because
the imposition of double taxation would
impede tribal economic growth).
Just like BIA’s surface leasing
regulations, tribal regulations under the
HEARTH Act pervasively cover all
aspects of leasing. See Guidance for the
Approval of Tribal Leasing Regulations
under the HEARTH Act, NPM–TRUS–
29 (effective Jan. 16, 2013) (providing
guidance on Federal review process to
ensure consistency of proposed tribal
regulations with Part 162 regulations
and listing required tribal regulatory
provisions). Furthermore, the Federal
government remains involved in the
tribal land leasing process by approving
the tribal leasing regulations in the first
instance and providing technical
assistance, upon request by a tribe, for
the development of an environmental
review process. The Secretary also
retains authority to take any necessary
actions to remedy violations of a lease
or of the tribal regulations, including
terminating the lease or rescinding
approval of the tribal regulations and
reassuming lease approval
responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary
continues to review, approve, and
monitor individual Indian land leases
and other types of leases not covered
under the tribal regulations according to
the Part 162 regulations.
Accordingly, the Federal and tribal
interests weigh heavily in favor of
preemption of State and local taxes on
lease-related activities and interests,
regardless of whether the lease is
governed by tribal leasing regulations or
Part 162. Improvements, activities, and
leasehold or possessory interests may be
subject to taxation by the Seminole
Tribe of Florida.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: July 29, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015–19604 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Aug 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[15X L1109AF LLUT980300
L11100000.PH0000 24–1A]
Utah Resource Advisory Council/
Recreation Resource Advisory Council
Meeting
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act, the Federal Advisory Committee
Act, and the Federal Lands Recreation
Enhancement Act, the Bureau of Land
Management’s (BLM) Utah Resource
Advisory Council (RAC)/Recreation
Resource Advisory Council (RecRAC)
will meet as indicated below.
DATES: The BLM-Utah RAC will meet
September 9, 2015, from 8:00 a.m.–5:00
p.m., and the BLM-Utah RAC/RecRAC
will meet September 10, 2015, from 8:00
a.m.–Noon.
ADDRESSES: The RAC/RecRAC will meet
at the San Juan County Public Library,
Monticello Branch, 80 North Main,
Monticello, Utah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherry Foot, Special Programs
Coordinator, Bureau of Land
Management, Utah State Office, 440
West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84101; phone (801)539–4195;
or, sfoot@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 9, 2015, the RAC will take a
field tour of Alkali Ridge, in Blanding,
Utah. A 15-minute briefing will be held
at the San Juan County Library,
Monticello Branch, 80 North Main,
Monticello, Utah, beginning at 8:00 a.m.
Topics of discussion will be: Reviewing
archaeological sites; discussions on the
Tread Lightly! anti-looting campaign,
the transportation system in relation to
the Richfield decision on transportation
management plans in Utah, and oil and
gas leasing. After the field tour, the RAC
will meet at the San Juan County
Library for a business meeting. Further
discussion on topics will include: Antilooting, Richfield litigation,
programmatic agreement for travel
management planning, the Moab Master
Leasing Plan, and updates on the Grand
Staircase-Escalante National Monument
Management Plan Amendment for
Livestock Grazing. On September 10,
the RAC/RecRAC will listen to fee
presentations from the BLM and the
Ashley National Forest. The BLM will
present proposals to increase fees at
Monticello Field Office Campgrounds
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and the Sand Flats Recreation Area. The
Ashley National Forest will present a
proposal to increase their Christmas tree
permit fees.
A one-hour public comment period
will take place September 10, from
9:30–10:30 a.m., where the public may
address the RAC. Written comments
may also be sent to the BLM at the
address listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
The meeting is open to the public;
however, transportation, lodging, and
meals are the responsibility of the
participating individuals.
Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to leave a message or question for the
above individual. The FIRS is available
24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Replies are provided during normal
business hours.
Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–1.
Kent Hoffman,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–19564 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[F–14902–A, F–14902–A2; LLAK940000–
L14100000–HY0000–P]
Alaska Native Claims Selection
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of decision approving
lands for conveyance.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that an
appealable decision will be issued by
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
approving conveyance of the surface
estate in the lands described below to
Napaskiak Incorporated, pursuant to the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
DATES: Any party claiming a property
interest in the lands affected by the
decision may appeal the decision in
accordance with the requirements of 43
CFR part 4. Please see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
the time limits for appealing the
decision.
SUMMARY:
A copy of the decision may
be obtained from: Bureau of Land
Management, Alaska State Office, 222
West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage,
AK 99513–7504.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
BLM by phone at 907–271–5960 or by
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 153 (Monday, August 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47949-47950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19604]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]
HEARTH Act Approval of Seminole Tribe of Florida Regulations
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On January 8, 2015, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
approved the Seminole Tribe of Florida leasing regulations under the
HEARTH Act. With this approval, the Tribe is authorized to enter into
the following type of leases without BIA approval: Business and
residential ordinances.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Morales, Office of Trust
Services--Division of Realty, Bureau of Indian Affairs; Telephone (202)
768-4166; Email cynthia.morales@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH (Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal
Homeownership) Act of 2012 (the Act) makes a voluntary, alternative
land leasing process available to tribes, by amending the Indian Long-
Term Leasing Act of 1955, 25 U.S.C. 415. The Act authorizes tribes to
negotiate and enter into agricultural and business leases of tribal
trust lands with a primary term of 25 years, and up to two renewal
terms of 25 years each, without the approval of the Secretary of the
Interior. The Act also authorizes tribes to enter into leases for
residential, recreational, religious or educational purposes for a
primary term of up to 75 years without the approval of the Secretary.
Participating tribes develop tribal leasing regulations, including an
environmental review process, and then must obtain the Secretary's
approval of those regulations prior to entering into leases. The Act
requires the Secretary to approve tribal regulations if the tribal
regulations are consistent with the Department's leasing regulations at
25 CFR part 162 and provide for an environmental review process that
meets requirements set forth in the Act. This notice announces that the
Secretary, through the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, has
approved the tribal regulations for the Seminole Tribe of Florida.
II. Federal Preemption of State and Local Taxes
The Department's regulations governing the surface leasing of trust
and restricted Indian lands specify that, subject to applicable Federal
law, permanent improvements on leased land, leasehold or possessory
interests, and activities under the lease are not subject to State and
local taxation and may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with
jurisdiction. See 25 CFR 162.017. As explained further in the preamble
to the final regulations, the Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development, self-determination, and tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72,440, 72447-48 (December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of State law in the field of Indian
leasing and the taxation of lease-related interests and activities
applies with equal force to leases entered into under tribal leasing
regulations approved by the Federal government pursuant to the HEARTH
Act.
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C 465, preempts
State and local taxation of permanent improvements on trust land.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston County, 724
F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Mescalero Apache Tribe v.
Jones, 411 U.S. 145 (1973)). In addition, as explained in the preamble
to the revised leasing regulations at 25 CFR part 162, Federal courts
have applied a balancing test to determine whether State and local
taxation of non-Indians on the reservation is preempted. White Mountain
Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker
balancing test, which is conducted against a backdrop of ``traditional
notions of Indian self-government,'' requires a particularized
examination of the relevant State, Federal, and tribal interests. We
hereby adopt the Bracker analysis from the preamble to the surface
leasing regulations, 77 FR at 72,447-48, as supplemented by the
analysis below.
The strong Federal and tribal interests against State and local
taxation of improvements, leaseholds, and activities on land leased
under the Department's leasing regulations apply equally to
improvements, leaseholds, and activities on land leased pursuant to
tribal leasing regulations approved under the HEARTH Act. Congress's
overarching intent was to ``allow tribes to exercise greater control
over their own land, support self-determination, and eliminate
bureaucratic delays that stand in the way of homeownership and economic
development in tribal communities.'' 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682 (May 15,
2012). The HEARTH Act was intended to afford tribes ``flexibility to
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business and cultural needs'' and to
``enable [tribes] to approve leases quickly and efficiently.'' Id. at
5-6.
Assessment of State and local taxes would obstruct these express
Federal policies supporting tribal economic development and self-
determination, and also threaten substantial tribal interests in
effective tribal government, economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring) (determining that ``[a] key
goal of the Federal Government is to render Tribes more self-
sufficient, and better positioned to fund their own sovereign
[[Page 47950]]
functions, rather than relying on Federal funding''). The additional
costs of State and local taxation have a chilling effect on potential
lessees, as well as on a tribe that, as a result, might refrain from
exercising its own sovereign right to impose a tribal tax to support
its infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043-44 (finding that State and
local taxes greatly discourage tribes from raising tax revenue from the
same sources because the imposition of double taxation would impede
tribal economic growth).
Just like BIA's surface leasing regulations, tribal regulations
under the HEARTH Act pervasively cover all aspects of leasing. See
Guidance for the Approval of Tribal Leasing Regulations under the
HEARTH Act, NPM-TRUS-29 (effective Jan. 16, 2013) (providing guidance
on Federal review process to ensure consistency of proposed tribal
regulations with Part 162 regulations and listing required tribal
regulatory provisions). Furthermore, the Federal government remains
involved in the tribal land leasing process by approving the tribal
leasing regulations in the first instance and providing technical
assistance, upon request by a tribe, for the development of an
environmental review process. The Secretary also retains authority to
take any necessary actions to remedy violations of a lease or of the
tribal regulations, including terminating the lease or rescinding
approval of the tribal regulations and reassuming lease approval
responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary continues to review, approve,
and monitor individual Indian land leases and other types of leases not
covered under the tribal regulations according to the Part 162
regulations.
Accordingly, the Federal and tribal interests weigh heavily in
favor of preemption of State and local taxes on lease-related
activities and interests, regardless of whether the lease is governed
by tribal leasing regulations or Part 162. Improvements, activities,
and leasehold or possessory interests may be subject to taxation by the
Seminole Tribe of Florida.
Dated: July 29, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015-19604 Filed 8-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
