Liberalization of Certain Documentary Evidence Required as Proof of Exportation on Drawback Claims, 47405-47407 [2015-19466]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
PART 746—[AMENDED]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 746 continues to read as follows:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 287c; Sec 1503,
Pub. L. 108–11, 117 Stat. 559; 22 U.S.C. 6004;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994
Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR
26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168;
Presidential Determination 2003–23 of May
7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003;
Presidential Determination 2007–7 of
December 7, 2006, 72 FR 1899 (January 16,
2007); Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959
(August 11, 2014); Notice of May 6, 2015, 80
FR 26815 (May 8, 2015).
4. Section 746.5 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 746.5
Russian industry sector sanctions.
(a) * * *
(2) Additional prohibition on those
informed by BIS. BIS may inform
persons, either individually by specific
notice or through amendment to the
EAR, that a license is required for a
specific export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) or for the export, reexport, or
transfer (in-country) of specified items
to a certain end-user or end-use, because
there is an unacceptable risk of use in,
or diversion to, the activities specified
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section in
Russia. Specific notice is to be given
only by, or at the direction of, the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration. When such notice is
provided orally, it will be followed by
a written notice within two working
days signed by the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration.
However, the absence of any such
notification does not excuse persons
from compliance with the license
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 30, 2015.
Eric L. Hirschhorn,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry
and Security.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2015–19274 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am]
15:21 Aug 06, 2015
19 CFR Parts 181 and 191
[CBP Dec. 15–11]
RIN 1515–AE02
Liberalization of Certain Documentary
Evidence Required as Proof of
Exportation on Drawback Claims
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document amends U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations by removing some of the
requirements for documentation used to
establish proof of exportation for
drawback claims. Currently, claimants
must provide originally signed
documentary evidence or a certified
copy of such documentary evidence to
establish the date and fact of exportation
of articles for drawback purposes. This
document also amends various sections
of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) to reflect that there is
no longer a legal requirement that the
export invoice for mail shipments be
certified. Additionally, this document
amends Appendix B to part 191 of title
19 so that the Appendix reflects
previous regulatory amendments closing
four drawback offices. Finally, this
document amends CBP regulations to
reflect the change from the legacy
agency name of U.S. Customs Service to
the current agency name of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection and to
make other non-substantive editorial
changes.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 7, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
legal aspects, Carrie L. Owens, Chief,
Entry Process & Duty Refunds Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, (202) 325–0266. For
operational aspects, Celestine L. Harrell,
Chief, Post Release and Trade Processes
Branch, Office of International Trade,
(202) 863–6937.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
This document amends the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations by: (1) Removing some of
the requirements for drawback
claimants to establish proof of
exportation; (2) conforming Appendix B
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47405
to part 191 of the CBP regulations to
previous regulatory changes reflecting
the closing of four drawback offices; (3)
updating the regulations to reflect that
CBP is now part of the Department of
Homeland Security; and (4) making
other non-substantive editorial and
nomenclature changes.
Easing the Requirements for
Establishing Proof of Exportation
This document amends title 19 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR) by
making amendments to 19 CFR parts
181 and 191, specifically, sections 19
CFR 181.47, 191.72 and 191.74 to align
CBP documentation requirements with
current business practices related to the
documents used to establish the date
and fact of exportation for purposes of
drawback. In order to qualify for
drawback, claimants must establish that
articles are exported or destroyed. When
drawback is claimed for exported goods,
the claimant must submit
documentation that establishes fully the
date and fact of exportation and the
identity of the exporter. See 19 CFR
191.72. For certain types of drawback
claims subject to the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA),
documentation must also establish the
identity and location of the ultimate
consignee of the exported goods. See 19
CFR 181.47 (b)(2)(ii)(G).
The documents for establishing
exportation include, but are not limited
to: a bill of lading, air waybill, freight
waybill, Canadian Customs manifest,
and/or cargo manifest. See 19 CFR
191.72(a). If the export is a mail
shipment, vessel supply, or transfer to a
foreign trade zone, other procedures to
establish exportation may apply. See 19
CFR 191.72 (c)–(e). Current CBP
regulations specify that the documents
listed in paragraph (a) must be either
originally signed or certified copies
thereof. See 19 CFR 191.72(a).
Additionally, certain claims subject to
NAFTA require that the claimant
produce an originally signed document
or a certified copy of such document.
See 19 CFR 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(G).
Acquiring pen and ink signatures for
the original documentation or certified
copies of such documentation is time
consuming and often unrealistic for the
trade. CBP realizes the difficulty of
having to provide a pen and ink
signature for documents when these
documents are issued electronically and
do not contain an actual pen and ink
signature. As a consequence, drawback
claims are often denied when claimants
can produce only documentary
evidence that does not contain a
signature or copies of such documents
that are not certified.
E:\FR\FM\07AUR1.SGM
07AUR1
47406
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
As such, CBP is amending its
regulations by removing the
requirement that the documentary
evidence that establishes the date and
fact of exportation for drawback
eligibility be originally signed or that
any copy of such documentary evidence
must be certified. CBP will now allow
claimants to provide unsigned originals
or copies of documentary evidence as
proof of export for drawback eligibility.
Therefore, copies of original
documentary evidence will no longer
need to be certified.
Additionally, pursuant to 19 CFR
191.72(c), CBP currently requires a
certified export invoice for mail
shipments and references section
191.74. Even though section 191.72(c)
cites to section 191.74 as a reference for
the ‘‘certified export invoice’’
requirement for mail shipments, the
regulatory text of 19 CFR 191.74 does
not require a claimant to submit a
certified copy of the export invoice, but
only requires that the claimant provide
the official postal records. There is no
reference to ‘‘export invoice’’ in section
191.74. Further, the only reference to
‘‘certification’’ is in the title heading to
section 191.74. Accordingly, CBP is
removing the phrase ‘‘Certification of’’
from the heading text to section 191.74
as it is misleading as to what that
regulation requires. Thus, CBP is
clarifying that claimants submitting
postal records in support of exportation
in accordance with section 191.74 may
submit either originals or uncertified
copies of official postal records by
clearly stating that within the text of
section 191.74. Further, CBP is revising
section 191.72(c) to accurately reflect
the plain language of section 191.74 by
requiring evidence of official postal
records (originals or copies) that
demonstrate exportation by mail.
Other non-substantive editorial
changes to reflect the plain English
mandate are made to these regulatory
sections, 19 CFR 181.47, 191.72 and
191.74.
Conforming Amendments
CBP inadvertently failed to remove
from Appendix B to part 191 references
to certain drawback offices when the
agency previously amended the
regulations to close four drawback
offices. Three drawback offices were
closed in 2003 (Boston, MA; New
Orleans, LA; and Miami, FL) and one in
2010 (Long Beach, CA). See
Consolidation of Customs Drawback
Centers: Final rule, 68 FR 3381, dated
January 24, 2003; and Further
Consolidation of CBP Drawback Centers:
Final rule, 75 FR 24392, dated May 5,
2010. Accordingly, this document
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:21 Aug 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
amends Appendix B, Sections II through
V within part 191 of 19 CFR to reflect
the closure of those four drawback
offices by removing the reference to
eight drawback offices and by removing
the references to the locations of the
four closed offices (that is, Boston, MA;
Long Beach, CA; Miami, FL; and New
Orleans, LA).
Nomenclature Changes
On November 25, 2002, the President
signed into law the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat.
2135). Accordingly, as of March 1, 2003,
the former U.S. Customs Service of the
Department of the Treasury was
transferred to DHS and reorganized to
become CBP. Accordingly, this
document further amends § 181.47 to
reflect the change from the legacy
agency name, U.S. Customs Service, to
the current name, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or CBP.
Discussion of Changes
Part 181
Section 181.47 of the CBP regulations
(19 CFR 181.47) pertains to the
documents required for a NAFTA
drawback claim. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(G)
of § 181.47 is amended by removing the
requirement that copies of the exemplar
documents in that paragraph be
certified.
In addition, section 181.47 contains
the legacy agency name of Customs.
Accordingly, § 181.47 is amended to
remove the outdated information and
replace it with the current agency name
CBP in §§ 181.47(b)(2),
181.47(b)(2)(i)(A), 181.47(b)(2)(i)(B),
181.47(b)(2)(i)(F), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(A),
181.47(b)(2)(ii)(B), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(C),
181.47(b)(2)(ii)(D), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(E),
181.47(b)(2)(iii)(A), 181.47(b)(2)(iii)(B),
and 181.47(b)(2)(iii)(D). Additionally,
the word ‘‘shall’’ is replaced with either
‘‘must’’, ‘‘will’’ or ‘‘is’’, as appropriate,
in paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(i),
(b)(2)(i)(E), (b)(2)(ii), (b)(2)(ii)(B),
(b)(2)(ii)(G), (b)(2)(ii)(H), (b)(2)(iii),
(b)(2)(iv), (b)(2)(v), and (c) of § 181.47 to
conform with the plain English
mandate.
Part 191
Section 191.72 of the CBP regulations
(19 CFR 191.72) pertains to exportation
procedures for drawback. Section
191.72(a) is amended by removing the
terms ‘‘originally signed’’ and
‘‘certified’’ from the list of acceptable
documentary evidence for establishing
the date and fact of exportation for
drawback eligibility. Section 191.72(c)
is revised to reflect the requirements of
section 191.74 and to reflect that the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
postal records for export shipments no
longer have to be certified. Section
191.74 is amended by removing the
words ‘‘Certification of’’ from the
heading text because the text of 191.74
does not require a claimant to submit a
certified copy of the postal record and
the title heading cannot impose a legal
requirement that is not also reflected in
the regulatory text. CBP is also making
it clear that claimants may submit either
originals or copies of official postal
records by adding the parenthetical
phrase ‘‘(originals or copies)’’ after the
phrase ‘‘official postal records’’ in
section 191.74.
This document also makes nonsubstantive amendments to Appendix B,
Sections II through V within part 191 of
19 CFR as discussed above.
Inapplicability of Notice and Delayed
Effective Date
Because the amendments in parts 181
and 191 of 19 CFR set forth in this
document merely relieve a burden on
the public and the amendments to the
Appendix of part 191 conform the
regulations to previous regulatory
changes to reflect the consolidation of
drawback offices, CBP finds that good
cause exists for dispensing with notice
and public procedure as unnecessary
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For this same
reason, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
CBP finds good cause for dispensing
with the requirement for a delayed
effective date.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this document is not subject
to the notice and public procedure
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553, it is not
subject to the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.).
Executive Order 12866
These amendments do not meet the
criteria for a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as specified in Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive
Order 13563.
Signing Authority
This regulation is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(a)(1),
pertaining to the authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury (or that of his
delegate) to approve regulations
concerning drawback.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 181
Administrative practice and
procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\07AUR1.SGM
07AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
19 CFR Part 191
Claims, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the CBP Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, parts
181 and 191 of the CBP Regulations (19
CFR parts 181 and 191) and Appendix
B to part 191 of 19 CFR are amended as
set forth below:
PART 181—NORTH AMERICAN FREE
TRADE AGREEMENT
1. The general authority citation for
part 181 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1624, 3314.
*
*
§ 181.47
*
*
*
[Amended]
2. In § 181.47:
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by:
■ (i) In the first sentence, by removing
the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘will’’;
■ (ii) In the second sentence, by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place it
occurs and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’; and
■ (iii) In the third sentence, by removing
the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘will’’;
■ b. Paragraph (b)(1) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place it
occurs and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’;
■ c. Paragraph (b)(2) introductory text is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Customs’’ and adding, in its place, the
term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ d. Paragraph (b)(2)(i) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’;
■ e. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A), (b)(2)(i)(B)
and (b)(2)(i)(F) are amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding, in its place, the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ f. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(E) and (b)(2)(ii)
introductory text are amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’;
■ g. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) is amended
by removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding, in its place, the term ‘‘CBP’’;
and by removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘must’’;
■ h. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) is amended
by:
■ (i) Removing the first and third
occurrence of the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding, in its place, the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ (ii) Removing the second occurrence
of the word ‘‘Customs’’ and adding, in
■
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Aug 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
its place, the words ‘‘the CBP-assigned’’;
and
■ (iii) Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘must’’;
■ i. Paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(C), (b)(2)(ii)(D)
and (b)(2)(ii)(E) are amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding, in its place, the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ j. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(G) is revised;
■ k. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(H) is amended
by removing the phrase ‘‘shall be’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘is’’;
■ l. Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’;
■ m. Paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(A),
(b)(2)(iii)(B), and (b)(2)(iii)(D) are
amended by removing the word
‘‘Customs’’ each place it appears and
adding, in its place, the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ n. Paragraph (b)(2)(iv) is amended by:
■ (i) Removing the first occurrence of
the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘will’’; and
■ (ii) Removing the second occurrence
of the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘must’’;
■ o. Paragraph (b)(2)(v) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘will’’; and
■ p. Paragraph (c) introductory text is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘must’’.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 181.47 Completion of claim for
drawback.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) Evidence of exportation.
Acceptable documentary evidence of
exportation of goods to Canada or
Mexico may include originals or copies
of any of the following documents that
are issued by the exporting carrier: bill
of lading, air waybill, freight waybill,
export ocean bill of lading, Canadian
customs manifest, and cargo manifest.
Supporting documentary evidence must
establish fully the time and fact of
exportation, the identity of the exporter,
and the identity and location of the
ultimate consignee of the exported
goods;
*
*
*
*
*
PART 191—DRAWBACK
3. The general authority citation for
part 191 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00009
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
§ 191.72
47407
[Amended]
4. In § 191.72:
a. The introductory paragraph is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘must’’ in the first two sentences; and
■ b. Paragraphs (a) and (c) are revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 191.72
Exportation procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Documentary evidence of
exportation (originals or copies) issued
by the exporting carrier, such as a bill
of lading, air waybill, freight waybill,
Canadian Customs manifest, and/or
cargo manifest;’’.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Official postal records (originals or
copies) which evidence exportation by
mail (§ 191.74);
*
*
*
*
*
§ 191.74
[Amended]
5. In § 191.74:
■ a. The section heading is revised;
■ b. In the first sentence, add the
parenthetical ‘‘(originals or copies’’)
after the phrase ‘‘the official postal
records’’; and
■ c. The last sentence is amended by
removing the parenthetical ‘‘(see
§ 191.51(a)’’ and adding, in its place, the
parenthetical ‘‘(see § 191.51(a))’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 191.74
*
*
Exportation by mail.
*
*
*
Appendix B to Part 191 [Amended]
6. In Appendix B to Part 191, Sections
II through V, under the headings titled,
‘‘CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK
CLAIMS WILL BE FILED’’ remove the
parenthetical ‘‘(The 8 offices where
drawback claims can be filed are located
at: Boston, MA; New York, NY; Miami,
FL; New Orleans, LA; Houston, TX;
Long Beach, CA; Chicago, IL; San
Francisco, CA)’’ each place it appears
and adding, in its place, the
parenthetical ‘‘(The four offices where
drawback claims can be filed are located
at: New York, NY; Houston, TX;
Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA)’’.
■
R. Gil Kerlikowske,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
Approved: August 4, 2015.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2015–19466 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
E:\FR\FM\07AUR1.SGM
07AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47405-47407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19466]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 181 and 191
[CBP Dec. 15-11]
RIN 1515-AE02
Liberalization of Certain Documentary Evidence Required as Proof
of Exportation on Drawback Claims
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations by removing some of the requirements for documentation used
to establish proof of exportation for drawback claims. Currently,
claimants must provide originally signed documentary evidence or a
certified copy of such documentary evidence to establish the date and
fact of exportation of articles for drawback purposes. This document
also amends various sections of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) to reflect that there is no longer a legal
requirement that the export invoice for mail shipments be certified.
Additionally, this document amends Appendix B to part 191 of title 19
so that the Appendix reflects previous regulatory amendments closing
four drawback offices. Finally, this document amends CBP regulations to
reflect the change from the legacy agency name of U.S. Customs Service
to the current agency name of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and to
make other non-substantive editorial changes.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 7, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For legal aspects, Carrie L. Owens,
Chief, Entry Process & Duty Refunds Branch, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade, (202) 325-0266. For operational aspects,
Celestine L. Harrell, Chief, Post Release and Trade Processes Branch,
Office of International Trade, (202) 863-6937.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations by: (1) Removing some of the requirements for drawback
claimants to establish proof of exportation; (2) conforming Appendix B
to part 191 of the CBP regulations to previous regulatory changes
reflecting the closing of four drawback offices; (3) updating the
regulations to reflect that CBP is now part of the Department of
Homeland Security; and (4) making other non-substantive editorial and
nomenclature changes.
Easing the Requirements for Establishing Proof of Exportation
This document amends title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(19 CFR) by making amendments to 19 CFR parts 181 and 191,
specifically, sections 19 CFR 181.47, 191.72 and 191.74 to align CBP
documentation requirements with current business practices related to
the documents used to establish the date and fact of exportation for
purposes of drawback. In order to qualify for drawback, claimants must
establish that articles are exported or destroyed. When drawback is
claimed for exported goods, the claimant must submit documentation that
establishes fully the date and fact of exportation and the identity of
the exporter. See 19 CFR 191.72. For certain types of drawback claims
subject to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA),
documentation must also establish the identity and location of the
ultimate consignee of the exported goods. See 19 CFR 181.47
(b)(2)(ii)(G).
The documents for establishing exportation include, but are not
limited to: a bill of lading, air waybill, freight waybill, Canadian
Customs manifest, and/or cargo manifest. See 19 CFR 191.72(a). If the
export is a mail shipment, vessel supply, or transfer to a foreign
trade zone, other procedures to establish exportation may apply. See 19
CFR 191.72 (c)-(e). Current CBP regulations specify that the documents
listed in paragraph (a) must be either originally signed or certified
copies thereof. See 19 CFR 191.72(a). Additionally, certain claims
subject to NAFTA require that the claimant produce an originally signed
document or a certified copy of such document. See 19 CFR
181.47(b)(2)(ii)(G).
Acquiring pen and ink signatures for the original documentation or
certified copies of such documentation is time consuming and often
unrealistic for the trade. CBP realizes the difficulty of having to
provide a pen and ink signature for documents when these documents are
issued electronically and do not contain an actual pen and ink
signature. As a consequence, drawback claims are often denied when
claimants can produce only documentary evidence that does not contain a
signature or copies of such documents that are not certified.
[[Page 47406]]
As such, CBP is amending its regulations by removing the
requirement that the documentary evidence that establishes the date and
fact of exportation for drawback eligibility be originally signed or
that any copy of such documentary evidence must be certified. CBP will
now allow claimants to provide unsigned originals or copies of
documentary evidence as proof of export for drawback eligibility.
Therefore, copies of original documentary evidence will no longer need
to be certified.
Additionally, pursuant to 19 CFR 191.72(c), CBP currently requires
a certified export invoice for mail shipments and references section
191.74. Even though section 191.72(c) cites to section 191.74 as a
reference for the ``certified export invoice'' requirement for mail
shipments, the regulatory text of 19 CFR 191.74 does not require a
claimant to submit a certified copy of the export invoice, but only
requires that the claimant provide the official postal records. There
is no reference to ``export invoice'' in section 191.74. Further, the
only reference to ``certification'' is in the title heading to section
191.74. Accordingly, CBP is removing the phrase ``Certification of''
from the heading text to section 191.74 as it is misleading as to what
that regulation requires. Thus, CBP is clarifying that claimants
submitting postal records in support of exportation in accordance with
section 191.74 may submit either originals or uncertified copies of
official postal records by clearly stating that within the text of
section 191.74. Further, CBP is revising section 191.72(c) to
accurately reflect the plain language of section 191.74 by requiring
evidence of official postal records (originals or copies) that
demonstrate exportation by mail.
Other non-substantive editorial changes to reflect the plain
English mandate are made to these regulatory sections, 19 CFR 181.47,
191.72 and 191.74.
Conforming Amendments
CBP inadvertently failed to remove from Appendix B to part 191
references to certain drawback offices when the agency previously
amended the regulations to close four drawback offices. Three drawback
offices were closed in 2003 (Boston, MA; New Orleans, LA; and Miami,
FL) and one in 2010 (Long Beach, CA). See Consolidation of Customs
Drawback Centers: Final rule, 68 FR 3381, dated January 24, 2003; and
Further Consolidation of CBP Drawback Centers: Final rule, 75 FR 24392,
dated May 5, 2010. Accordingly, this document amends Appendix B,
Sections II through V within part 191 of 19 CFR to reflect the closure
of those four drawback offices by removing the reference to eight
drawback offices and by removing the references to the locations of the
four closed offices (that is, Boston, MA; Long Beach, CA; Miami, FL;
and New Orleans, LA).
Nomenclature Changes
On November 25, 2002, the President signed into law the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135). Accordingly, as
of March 1, 2003, the former U.S. Customs Service of the Department of
the Treasury was transferred to DHS and reorganized to become CBP.
Accordingly, this document further amends Sec. 181.47 to reflect the
change from the legacy agency name, U.S. Customs Service, to the
current name, U.S. Customs and Border Protection or CBP.
Discussion of Changes
Part 181
Section 181.47 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR 181.47) pertains to
the documents required for a NAFTA drawback claim. Paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(G) of Sec. 181.47 is amended by removing the requirement
that copies of the exemplar documents in that paragraph be certified.
In addition, section 181.47 contains the legacy agency name of
Customs. Accordingly, Sec. 181.47 is amended to remove the outdated
information and replace it with the current agency name CBP in
Sec. Sec. 181.47(b)(2), 181.47(b)(2)(i)(A), 181.47(b)(2)(i)(B),
181.47(b)(2)(i)(F), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(A), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(B),
181.47(b)(2)(ii)(C), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(D), 181.47(b)(2)(ii)(E),
181.47(b)(2)(iii)(A), 181.47(b)(2)(iii)(B), and 181.47(b)(2)(iii)(D).
Additionally, the word ``shall'' is replaced with either ``must'',
``will'' or ``is'', as appropriate, in paragraphs (a), (b)(1),
(b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(i)(E), (b)(2)(ii), (b)(2)(ii)(B), (b)(2)(ii)(G),
(b)(2)(ii)(H), (b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(iv), (b)(2)(v), and (c) of Sec.
181.47 to conform with the plain English mandate.
Part 191
Section 191.72 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR 191.72) pertains to
exportation procedures for drawback. Section 191.72(a) is amended by
removing the terms ``originally signed'' and ``certified'' from the
list of acceptable documentary evidence for establishing the date and
fact of exportation for drawback eligibility. Section 191.72(c) is
revised to reflect the requirements of section 191.74 and to reflect
that the postal records for export shipments no longer have to be
certified. Section 191.74 is amended by removing the words
``Certification of'' from the heading text because the text of 191.74
does not require a claimant to submit a certified copy of the postal
record and the title heading cannot impose a legal requirement that is
not also reflected in the regulatory text. CBP is also making it clear
that claimants may submit either originals or copies of official postal
records by adding the parenthetical phrase ``(originals or copies)''
after the phrase ``official postal records'' in section 191.74.
This document also makes non-substantive amendments to Appendix B,
Sections II through V within part 191 of 19 CFR as discussed above.
Inapplicability of Notice and Delayed Effective Date
Because the amendments in parts 181 and 191 of 19 CFR set forth in
this document merely relieve a burden on the public and the amendments
to the Appendix of part 191 conform the regulations to previous
regulatory changes to reflect the consolidation of drawback offices,
CBP finds that good cause exists for dispensing with notice and public
procedure as unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For this same
reason, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), CBP finds good cause for
dispensing with the requirement for a delayed effective date.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this document is not subject to the notice and public
procedure requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553, it is not subject to the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Executive Order 12866
These amendments do not meet the criteria for a ``significant
regulatory action'' as specified in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563.
Signing Authority
This regulation is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR
0.1(a)(1), pertaining to the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury
(or that of his delegate) to approve regulations concerning drawback.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 181
Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 47407]]
19 CFR Part 191
Claims, Customs duties and inspection, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the CBP Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, parts 181 and 191 of the CBP
Regulations (19 CFR parts 181 and 191) and Appendix B to part 191 of 19
CFR are amended as set forth below:
PART 181--NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
0
1. The general authority citation for part 181 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 3314.
* * * * *
Sec. 181.47 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 181.47:
0
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by:
0
(i) In the first sentence, by removing the word ``shall'' and adding,
in its place, the word ``will'';
0
(ii) In the second sentence, by removing the word ``shall'' each place
it occurs and adding, in its place, the word ``must''; and
0
(iii) In the third sentence, by removing the word ``shall'' and adding,
in its place, the word ``will'';
0
b. Paragraph (b)(1) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' each
place it occurs and adding, in its place, the word ``must'';
0
c. Paragraph (b)(2) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``Customs'' and adding, in its place, the term ``CBP'';
0
d. Paragraph (b)(2)(i) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``must'';
0
e. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A), (b)(2)(i)(B) and (b)(2)(i)(F) are amended
by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding, in its place, the term
``CBP'';
0
f. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(E) and (b)(2)(ii) introductory text are amended
by removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word
``must'';
0
g. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) is amended by removing the word ``Customs''
and adding, in its place, the term ``CBP''; and by removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must'';
0
h. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) is amended by:
0
(i) Removing the first and third occurrence of the word ``Customs'' and
adding, in its place, the term ``CBP'';
0
(ii) Removing the second occurrence of the word ``Customs'' and adding,
in its place, the words ``the CBP-assigned''; and
0
(iii) Removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word
``must'';
0
i. Paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(C), (b)(2)(ii)(D) and (b)(2)(ii)(E) are
amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding, in its place, the
term ``CBP'';
0
j. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(G) is revised;
0
k. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(H) is amended by removing the phrase ``shall
be'' and adding, in its place, the word ``is'';
0
l. Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``must'';
0
m. Paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(A), (b)(2)(iii)(B), and (b)(2)(iii)(D) are
amended by removing the word ``Customs'' each place it appears and
adding, in its place, the term ``CBP'';
0
n. Paragraph (b)(2)(iv) is amended by:
0
(i) Removing the first occurrence of the word ``shall'' and adding, in
its place, the word ``will''; and
0
(ii) Removing the second occurrence of the word ``shall'' and adding,
in its place, the word ``must'';
0
o. Paragraph (b)(2)(v) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``will''; and
0
p. Paragraph (c) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 181.47 Completion of claim for drawback.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) Evidence of exportation. Acceptable documentary evidence of
exportation of goods to Canada or Mexico may include originals or
copies of any of the following documents that are issued by the
exporting carrier: bill of lading, air waybill, freight waybill, export
ocean bill of lading, Canadian customs manifest, and cargo manifest.
Supporting documentary evidence must establish fully the time and fact
of exportation, the identity of the exporter, and the identity and
location of the ultimate consignee of the exported goods;
* * * * *
PART 191--DRAWBACK
0
3. The general authority citation for part 191 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624.
* * * * *
Sec. 191.72 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 191.72:
0
a. The introductory paragraph is amended by removing the word ``shall''
and adding, in its place, the word ``must'' in the first two sentences;
and
0
b. Paragraphs (a) and (c) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.72 Exportation procedures.
* * * * *
(a) Documentary evidence of exportation (originals or copies)
issued by the exporting carrier, such as a bill of lading, air waybill,
freight waybill, Canadian Customs manifest, and/or cargo manifest;''.
* * * * *
(c) Official postal records (originals or copies) which evidence
exportation by mail (Sec. 191.74);
* * * * *
Sec. 191.74 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 191.74:
0
a. The section heading is revised;
0
b. In the first sentence, add the parenthetical ``(originals or
copies'') after the phrase ``the official postal records''; and
0
c. The last sentence is amended by removing the parenthetical ``(see
Sec. 191.51(a)'' and adding, in its place, the parenthetical ``(see
Sec. 191.51(a))''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 191.74 Exportation by mail.
* * * * *
Appendix B to Part 191 [Amended]
0
6. In Appendix B to Part 191, Sections II through V, under the headings
titled, ``CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS WILL BE FILED'' remove the
parenthetical ``(The 8 offices where drawback claims can be filed are
located at: Boston, MA; New York, NY; Miami, FL; New Orleans, LA;
Houston, TX; Long Beach, CA; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA)'' each
place it appears and adding, in its place, the parenthetical ``(The
four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located at: New
York, NY; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA)''.
R. Gil Kerlikowske,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Approved: August 4, 2015.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2015-19466 Filed 8-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P