Amendment To Participation by Religious Organizations in USAID Programs To Implement Executive Order 13559, 47237-47241 [2015-18261]
Download as PDF
Vol. 80
Thursday,
No. 151
August 6, 2015
Part V
Agency for International Development
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3
22 CFR Part 205
Amendment To Participation by Religious Organizations in USAID
Programs To Implement Executive Order 13559; Proposed Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:38 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\06AUP3.SGM
06AUP3
47238
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
22 CFR Part 205
RIN 0412–AA75
Amendment To Participation by
Religious Organizations in USAID
Programs To Implement Executive
Order 13559
U.S. Agency for International
Development.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) is
proposing to amend its regulations
governing the participation by religious
organizations in USAID’s programs to
reflect guidance from the Interagency
Working Group on Faith-Based and
Other Neighborhood Partnerships on
implementing Executive Order 13559.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this proposed rule to C.
Eduardo Vargas, Center for Faith-Based
& Community Initiatives (A/AID/
CFBCI), U.S. Agency for International
Development, Room 6.07–100 RRB,
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20523. Submit
comments, identified by title of the
action and Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Submit electronic comments to
FBCI@usaid.gov. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for file formats and other
information about electronic filing.
Mail: USAID, Center for Faith-Based &
Community Initiatives (A/AID/CFBCI),
Room 6.07–100, 1300 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20523.
A copy of each communication
submitted will be available for
inspection and copying between 8:30
a.m. and 5:30 p.m. at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Brinkmoeller, Director, Center for
Faith-Based and Community Initiatives,
USAID, Room 6.07–023, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20523; telephone: (202) 712–4080
(this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On December 12, 2002, President
Bush signed Executive Order 13279,
Equal Protection of the Laws for FaithBased and Community Organizations,
67 FR 77141. Executive Order 13279 set
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:38 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
forth the principles and policymaking
criteria to guide Federal agencies in
formulating and developing policies
with implications for faith-based
organizations and other community
organizations, to ensure equal
protection of the laws for faith-based
and other community organizations, and
to expand opportunities for, and
strengthen the capacity of, faith-based
and other community organizations to
meet social needs in America’s
communities. In addition, Executive
Order 13279 asked specified agency
heads to review and evaluate existing
policies relating to Federal financial
assistance for social services programs
and, where appropriate, to implement
new policies that were consistent with
and necessary to further the
fundamental principles and
policymaking criteria that have
implications for faith-based and
community organizations.
On October 20, 2004, USAID
published its final rule (the ‘‘Original
Rule’’) on participation by religious
organizations in USAID programs (69
FR 61,716, codified at 22 CFR parts 202,
205, 211, and 226). The Original Rule
implemented Executive Branch policy
that, within the framework of
constitutional guidelines, religious
organizations should be able to compete
on an equal footing with other
organizations for USAID funding. The
Original Rule revised USAID regulations
pertaining to grants, cooperative
agreements and contracts awarded for
the purpose of administering grant
programs to ensure their compliance
with this policy and to clarify that
religious organizations are eligible to
participate in programs on the same
basis as any other organization, with
respect to programs for which such
other organizations are eligible.
Shortly after taking office, President
Obama signed Executive Order 13498,
Amendments to Executive Order 13199
and Establishment of the President’s
Advisory Council for Faith-Based and
Neighborhood Partnerships, 74 FR 6533
(Feb. 9, 2009). Executive Order 13498
changed the name of the White House
Office of Faith-Based and Community
Initiatives to the White House Office of
Faith-Based and Neighborhood
Partnerships and established the
President’s Advisory Council for FaithBased and Neighborhood Partnerships
(Advisory Council). The President
created the Advisory Council to bring
together experts to, among other things,
make recommendations to the President
for changes in policies, programs, and
practices that affect the delivery of
services by faith-based and other
neighborhood organizations.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
The Advisory Council issued its
recommendations in a report entitled A
New Era of Partnerships: Report of
Recommendations to the President in
March 2010 (available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
microsites/ofbnp-council-finalreport.pdf). The Advisory Council
Report included recommendations to
amend Executive Order 13279 in order
to clarify the legal foundation of
partnerships and offered a new set of
fundamental principles to guide agency
decision-making in administering
Federal financial assistance and support
to faith-based and neighborhood
organizations.
President Obama signed Executive
Order 13559, Fundamental Principles
and Policymaking Criteria for
Partnerships with Faith-Based and
Other Neighborhood Organizations, on
November 17, 2010. 75 FR 71319
(available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
pkg/FR-2010-11-22/pdf/201029579.pdf). Executive Order 13559
incorporated the Advisory Council’s
recommendations by making certain
amendments to Executive Order 13279.
In addition, Executive Order 13559
created the Interagency Working Group
on Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood
Partnerships (Working Group) to review
and evaluate existing regulations,
guidance documents, and policies.
The Executive Order also stated that,
following receipt of the Working
Group’s report, OMB, in coordination
with the Department of Justice, must
issue guidance to agencies on the
implementation of the order. In August
2013, OMB issued such guidance. In
this guidance, OMB instructed specified
agency heads to adopt regulations and
guidance that will fulfill the
requirements of the Executive Order and
to amend regulations and guidance to
ensure that they are consistent with
Executive Order 13559. The guidance
incorporated the Working Group’s
Report, which noted that it focused
largely on domestic considerations. The
Report went on to note that for programs
operating in foreign countries,
additional considerations may be
implicated, and that agencies, such as
USAID, should consult with the
Department of Justice on
implementation of the Executive Order.
Thus, the changes proposed in this rule
result from those consultations.
On March 25, 2011, USAID issued a
Notice of Public Rulemaking (NPRM)
proposing amendments to section (d) of
its Original Rule. That process is
ongoing. USAID is not proposing any
amendments to section (d) under this
proposed rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\06AUP3.SGM
06AUP3
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
II. Overview of Proposed Rule
USAID proposes to amend 22 CFR
part 205, Participation by Religious
Organizations in USAID Programs, to
make it consistent with Executive Order
13559.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3
Prohibited Uses of Direct Federal
Financial Assistance
Part 205 and Executive Order 13279
prohibit nongovernmental organizations
from using direct Federal financial
assistance (e.g., government grants,
contracts, sub-grants, and subcontracts)
for ‘‘inherently religious activities, such
as worship, religious instruction, and
proselytization.’’ The term ‘‘inherently
religious’’ has proven confusing. In
2006, for example, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) found that,
while all 26 of the religious social
service providers it interviewed said
they understood the prohibition on
using direct Federal financial assistance
for ‘‘inherently religious activities,’’ four
of the providers described acting in
ways that appeared to violate that rule.
GAO, Faith-Based and Community
Initiative: Improvements in Monitoring
Grantees and Measuring Performance
Could Enhance Accountability, GAO–
06–616, at 34–35 (June 2006) (available
at https://www.gao.gov/new.items/
d06616.pdf).
Further, while the Supreme Court has
sometimes used the term ‘‘inherently
religious,’’ it has not used it to indicate
the boundary of what the Government
may subsidize with direct Federal
financial assistance. If the term is
interpreted narrowly, it could permit
actions that the Constitution prohibits.
On the other hand, one could also argue
that the term ‘‘inherently religious’’ is
too broad rather than too narrow. For
example, some might consider their
provision of a hot meal to a needy
person to be an ‘‘inherently religious’’
act when it is undertaken from a sense
of religious motivation or obligation,
even though it has no overt religious
content.
The Court has determined that the
Government cannot subsidize ‘‘a
specifically religious activity in an
otherwise substantially secular setting.’’
Hunt v. McNair, 413 U.S. 734, 743
(1973). It has also said a direct aid
program impermissibly advances
religion when the aid results in
governmental indoctrination of religion.
See Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793, 808
(2000) (Thomas, J., joined by Rehnquist,
C.J., Scalia, and Kennedy, JJ., plurality);
id. at 845 (O’Connor, J., joined by
Breyer, J., concurring in the judgment);
Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203, 223
(1997). This terminology is fairly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:38 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
interpreted to prohibit the Government
from directly subsidizing any
‘‘explicitly religious activity,’’ including
activities that involve overt religious
content. Thus, direct Federal financial
assistance should not be used to pay for
activities such as religious instruction,
devotional exercises, worship,
proselytizing or evangelism; production
or dissemination of devotional guides or
other religious materials; or counseling
in which counselors introduce religious
content. Similarly, direct Federal
financial assistance may not be used to
pay for equipment or supplies to the
extent they are allocated to such
activities.
Activities that are secular in content,
such as serving meals to the needy or
using a nonreligious text to teach
someone to read, are not considered
‘‘explicitly religious activities’’ merely
because the provider is religiously
motivated to provide those services. The
study or acknowledgement of religion as
a historical or cultural reality also
would not be considered an explicitly
religious activity.
Likewise, it is important to emphasize
that the restrictions on explicit religious
content apply to content generated by
the administrators of the program
receiving direct Federal financial
assistance, not to spontaneous
comments made by individual
beneficiaries about their personal lives
in the context of these programs. For
example, if a person administering a
federally funded job skills program asks
beneficiaries to describe how they gain
the motivation necessary for their job
searches and some beneficiaries refer to
their faith or membership in a faith
community, these kinds of comments do
not violate the restrictions and should
not be censored. In this context, it is
clear that the administrator of the
government program did not orchestrate
or encourage such comments.
USAID, therefore, proposes to amend
its regulations to replace the term
‘‘inherently religious activities’’ with
the term ‘‘explicitly religious activities’’
and define the latter term as ‘‘including
activities that involve overt religious
content such as worship, religious
instruction, or proselytization.’’ These
changes in language will provide greater
clarity and more closely match
constitutional standards as they have
been developed in case law.
These restrictions would not diminish
existing regulatory protections for the
religious identity of faith-based
providers. The proposed rule would not
affect, for example, organizations’
ability to use religious terms in their
organizational names, select board
members on a religious basis, include
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
47239
religious references in mission
statements and other organizational
documents, and post religious art,
messages, scriptures and symbols in
buildings where Federal financial
assistance is delivered.
Intermediaries
USAID proposes language that will
clarify that organizations who receive
USAID financial assistance through
subawards must comply with the
requirements relating to protections for
beneficiaries and the restrictions on
prohibited uses of federal financial
assistance. The language of USAID’s
rule has always couched the
requirements in the rule as applying to
organizations ‘‘that receive direct
financial assistance from USAID,’’
which by its terms includes any
organizations that receive such
assistance, whether they did so through
a prime award or a sub-award. However,
to avoid any doubt, USAID proposes to
add language explicitly stating that the
requirements of the rule apply to
organizations ‘‘that receive direct
financial assistance from USAID
(including through a prime award or
sub-award).’’
Protections for Beneficiaries
Executive Order 13559 makes it clear
that all organizations that receive
Federal financial assistance for the
purpose of delivering social welfare
services are prohibited from
discriminating against beneficiaries or
potential beneficiaries of those programs
on the basis of religion, a religious
belief, refusal to hold a religious belief,
or a refusal to attend or participate in a
religious practice. It also states that
organizations offering explicitly
religious activities (including activities
that involve overt religious content such
as worship, religious instruction or
proselytization) must not use direct
Federal financial assistance to subsidize
or support those activities, and that any
explicitly religious activities must be
offered outside of programs that are
supported with direct Federal financial
assistance (including through prime
awards or sub-awards). In other words,
to the extent that an organization
provides explicitly religious activities,
those activities must be offered
separately in time or location from
programs or services supported with
direct Federal financial assistance. And,
as noted above, participation in those
religious activities must be completely
voluntary for beneficiaries of programs
supported by Federal financial
assistance. USAID proposes to add
language to the sections of its rule
covering these concepts to conform
E:\FR\FM\06AUP3.SGM
06AUP3
47240
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
more directly to the Executive Order
language.
chapter II of title 22 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
Political or Religious Affiliation
The proposed rule provides that
decisions about awards of Federal
financial assistance must be free from
political interference or even the
appearance of such interference. USAID
must instruct participants in the
awarding process to refrain from taking
religious affiliations or non-religious
affiliations into account in this process;
i.e., an organization should not receive
favorable or unfavorable marks merely
because it is affiliated or unaffiliated
with a religious body, or related or
unrelated to a specific religion. When
selecting peer reviewers, the awarding
entity should never ask about religious
affiliation or take such matters into
account. But it should encourage
religious, political and professional
diversity among peer reviewers by
advertising for these positions in a wide
variety of venues.
PART 205—PARTICIPATION BY
RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN
USAID PROGRAMS
III. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, is not subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804. The main effect of
the rule is to provide clarifying language
around the types of activities that may
be funded with Federal financial
assistance, thereby preventing confusion
in stakeholders and lessening the need
for stakeholders to consult USAID for
clarification on appropriate activities.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), USAID has
considered the economic impact of the
proposed rule. USAID certifies that the
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Paperwork Burden
This proposed rule does not impose
any new recordkeeping requirements
nor does it change or modify an existing
information collection activity. Thus,
the Paperwork Reduction Act does not
apply to this proposed rule.
List of Subjects of 22 CFR Part 205
Foreign aid, Grant programs,
Nonprofit organizations.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, USAID proposes to amend
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:38 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
1. The authority citation for part 205
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2381(a).
2. Amend § 205.1 by revising
paragraphs (b), (c), (e), and (f), and
adding paragraph (j), to read as follows:
■
§ 205.1 Grants and cooperative
agreements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Organizations that receive direct
financial assistance from USAID under
any USAID program (including through
a prime award or sub-award) may not
engage in explicitly religious activities
(including activities that involve overt
religious content such as worship,
religious instruction, or proselytization),
as part of the programs or services
directly funded with direct financial
assistance from USAID. If an
organization conducts such activities,
the activities must be offered separately,
in time or location, from the programs
or services funded with direct financial
assistance from USAID, and
participation must be voluntary for
beneficiaries of the programs or services
funded with such assistance. These
restrictions on explicitly religious
activities do not apply to programs
where USAID funds are provided to
chaplains to work with inmates in
prisons, detention facilities, or
community correction centers, or where
USAID funds are provided to religious
or other organizations for programs in
prisons, detention facilities, or
community correction centers, in which
such organizations assist chaplains in
carrying out their duties.
(c) A religious organization that
applies for, or participates in, USAIDfunded programs or services (including
through a prime award or sub-award)
may retain its independence and may
continue to carry out its mission,
including the definition, development,
practice, and expression of its religious
beliefs, provided that it does not use
direct financial assistance from USAID
(including through a prime award or
sub-award) to support or engage in any
explicitly religious activities (including
activities that involve overt religious
content such as worship, religious
instruction, or proselytization), or in
any other manner prohibited by law.
Among other things, a religious
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
organization that receives financial
assistance from USAID may use space in
its facilities, without removing religious
art, icons, scriptures, or other religious
symbols. In addition, a religious
organization that receives financial
assistance from USAID retains its
authority over its internal governance,
and it may retain religious terms in its
organization’s name, select its board
members on a religious basis, and
include religious references in its
organization’s mission statements and
other governing documents.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) An organization that participates
in programs funded by financial
assistance from USAID (including
through a prime award or sub-award)
shall not, in providing services,
discriminate against a program
beneficiary or potential program
beneficiary on the basis of religion or
religious belief, refusal to hold a
religious belief, or a refusal to attend or
participate in a religious practice.
(f) No grant document, contract,
agreement, covenant, memorandum of
understanding, policy, or regulation that
is used by USAID shall require only
religious organizations to provide
assurances that they will not use monies
or property for explicitly religious
activities (including activities that
involve overt religious content such as
worship, religious instruction, or
proselytization). Any such restrictions
shall apply equally to religious and
secular organizations. All organizations
that participate in USAID programs
(including through a prime award or
sub-award), including religious ones,
must carry out eligible activities in
accordance with all program
requirements and other applicable
requirements governing the conduct of
USAID-funded activities, including
those prohibiting the use of direct
financial assistance from USAID to
engage in explicitly religious activities.
No grant document, agreement,
covenant, memorandum of
understanding, policy, or regulation that
is used by USAID shall disqualify
religious organizations from
participating in USAID’s programs
because such organizations are
motivated or influenced by religious
faith to provide social services, or
because of their religious character or
affiliation.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\06AUP3.SGM
06AUP3
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(j) Decisions about awards of USAID
financial assistance must be free from
political interference or even the
appearance of such interference and
must be made on the basis of merit, not
on the basis of religion or religious
belief.
47241
Dated: April 16, 2015.
Mark Brinkmoeller,
Director, Center for Faith-Based and
Community Initiatives.
Editorial note: This document was
received for publication by the Office of the
Federal Register on July 21, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–18261 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3
BILLING CODE 6116–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:38 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06AUP3.SGM
06AUP3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47237-47241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18261]
[[Page 47237]]
Vol. 80
Thursday,
No. 151
August 6, 2015
Part V
Agency for International Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
22 CFR Part 205
Amendment To Participation by Religious Organizations in USAID Programs
To Implement Executive Order 13559; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 80 , No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 47238]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
22 CFR Part 205
RIN 0412-AA75
Amendment To Participation by Religious Organizations in USAID
Programs To Implement Executive Order 13559
AGENCY: U.S. Agency for International Development.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is
proposing to amend its regulations governing the participation by
religious organizations in USAID's programs to reflect guidance from
the Interagency Working Group on Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood
Partnerships on implementing Executive Order 13559.
DATES: Submit comments on or before September 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this proposed rule to C.
Eduardo Vargas, Center for Faith-Based & Community Initiatives (A/AID/
CFBCI), U.S. Agency for International Development, Room 6.07-100 RRB,
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20523. Submit comments,
identified by title of the action and Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Submit electronic comments to FBCI@usaid.gov. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for file formats and other information about
electronic filing.
Mail: USAID, Center for Faith-Based & Community Initiatives (A/AID/
CFBCI), Room 6.07-100, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20523.
A copy of each communication submitted will be available for
inspection and copying between 8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Brinkmoeller, Director, Center
for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, USAID, Room 6.07-023, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20523; telephone: (202) 712-
4080 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 12, 2002, President Bush signed Executive Order 13279,
Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community
Organizations, 67 FR 77141. Executive Order 13279 set forth the
principles and policymaking criteria to guide Federal agencies in
formulating and developing policies with implications for faith-based
organizations and other community organizations, to ensure equal
protection of the laws for faith-based and other community
organizations, and to expand opportunities for, and strengthen the
capacity of, faith-based and other community organizations to meet
social needs in America's communities. In addition, Executive Order
13279 asked specified agency heads to review and evaluate existing
policies relating to Federal financial assistance for social services
programs and, where appropriate, to implement new policies that were
consistent with and necessary to further the fundamental principles and
policymaking criteria that have implications for faith-based and
community organizations.
On October 20, 2004, USAID published its final rule (the ``Original
Rule'') on participation by religious organizations in USAID programs
(69 FR 61,716, codified at 22 CFR parts 202, 205, 211, and 226). The
Original Rule implemented Executive Branch policy that, within the
framework of constitutional guidelines, religious organizations should
be able to compete on an equal footing with other organizations for
USAID funding. The Original Rule revised USAID regulations pertaining
to grants, cooperative agreements and contracts awarded for the purpose
of administering grant programs to ensure their compliance with this
policy and to clarify that religious organizations are eligible to
participate in programs on the same basis as any other organization,
with respect to programs for which such other organizations are
eligible.
Shortly after taking office, President Obama signed Executive Order
13498, Amendments to Executive Order 13199 and Establishment of the
President's Advisory Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood
Partnerships, 74 FR 6533 (Feb. 9, 2009). Executive Order 13498 changed
the name of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community
Initiatives to the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood
Partnerships and established the President's Advisory Council for
Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships (Advisory Council). The
President created the Advisory Council to bring together experts to,
among other things, make recommendations to the President for changes
in policies, programs, and practices that affect the delivery of
services by faith-based and other neighborhood organizations.
The Advisory Council issued its recommendations in a report
entitled A New Era of Partnerships: Report of Recommendations to the
President in March 2010 (available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ofbnp-council-final-report.pdf). The Advisory
Council Report included recommendations to amend Executive Order 13279
in order to clarify the legal foundation of partnerships and offered a
new set of fundamental principles to guide agency decision-making in
administering Federal financial assistance and support to faith-based
and neighborhood organizations.
President Obama signed Executive Order 13559, Fundamental
Principles and Policymaking Criteria for Partnerships with Faith-Based
and Other Neighborhood Organizations, on November 17, 2010. 75 FR 71319
(available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-11-22/pdf/2010-29579.pdf). Executive Order 13559 incorporated the Advisory Council's
recommendations by making certain amendments to Executive Order 13279.
In addition, Executive Order 13559 created the Interagency Working
Group on Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood Partnerships (Working
Group) to review and evaluate existing regulations, guidance documents,
and policies.
The Executive Order also stated that, following receipt of the
Working Group's report, OMB, in coordination with the Department of
Justice, must issue guidance to agencies on the implementation of the
order. In August 2013, OMB issued such guidance. In this guidance, OMB
instructed specified agency heads to adopt regulations and guidance
that will fulfill the requirements of the Executive Order and to amend
regulations and guidance to ensure that they are consistent with
Executive Order 13559. The guidance incorporated the Working Group's
Report, which noted that it focused largely on domestic considerations.
The Report went on to note that for programs operating in foreign
countries, additional considerations may be implicated, and that
agencies, such as USAID, should consult with the Department of Justice
on implementation of the Executive Order. Thus, the changes proposed in
this rule result from those consultations.
On March 25, 2011, USAID issued a Notice of Public Rulemaking
(NPRM) proposing amendments to section (d) of its Original Rule. That
process is ongoing. USAID is not proposing any amendments to section
(d) under this proposed rulemaking.
[[Page 47239]]
II. Overview of Proposed Rule
USAID proposes to amend 22 CFR part 205, Participation by Religious
Organizations in USAID Programs, to make it consistent with Executive
Order 13559.
Prohibited Uses of Direct Federal Financial Assistance
Part 205 and Executive Order 13279 prohibit nongovernmental
organizations from using direct Federal financial assistance (e.g.,
government grants, contracts, sub-grants, and subcontracts) for
``inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious
instruction, and proselytization.'' The term ``inherently religious''
has proven confusing. In 2006, for example, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) found that, while all 26 of the religious
social service providers it interviewed said they understood the
prohibition on using direct Federal financial assistance for
``inherently religious activities,'' four of the providers described
acting in ways that appeared to violate that rule. GAO, Faith-Based and
Community Initiative: Improvements in Monitoring Grantees and Measuring
Performance Could Enhance Accountability, GAO-06-616, at 34-35 (June
2006) (available at https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06616.pdf).
Further, while the Supreme Court has sometimes used the term
``inherently religious,'' it has not used it to indicate the boundary
of what the Government may subsidize with direct Federal financial
assistance. If the term is interpreted narrowly, it could permit
actions that the Constitution prohibits. On the other hand, one could
also argue that the term ``inherently religious'' is too broad rather
than too narrow. For example, some might consider their provision of a
hot meal to a needy person to be an ``inherently religious'' act when
it is undertaken from a sense of religious motivation or obligation,
even though it has no overt religious content.
The Court has determined that the Government cannot subsidize ``a
specifically religious activity in an otherwise substantially secular
setting.'' Hunt v. McNair, 413 U.S. 734, 743 (1973). It has also said a
direct aid program impermissibly advances religion when the aid results
in governmental indoctrination of religion. See Mitchell v. Helms, 530
U.S. 793, 808 (2000) (Thomas, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Scalia,
and Kennedy, JJ., plurality); id. at 845 (O'Connor, J., joined by
Breyer, J., concurring in the judgment); Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S.
203, 223 (1997). This terminology is fairly interpreted to prohibit the
Government from directly subsidizing any ``explicitly religious
activity,'' including activities that involve overt religious content.
Thus, direct Federal financial assistance should not be used to pay for
activities such as religious instruction, devotional exercises,
worship, proselytizing or evangelism; production or dissemination of
devotional guides or other religious materials; or counseling in which
counselors introduce religious content. Similarly, direct Federal
financial assistance may not be used to pay for equipment or supplies
to the extent they are allocated to such activities.
Activities that are secular in content, such as serving meals to
the needy or using a nonreligious text to teach someone to read, are
not considered ``explicitly religious activities'' merely because the
provider is religiously motivated to provide those services. The study
or acknowledgement of religion as a historical or cultural reality also
would not be considered an explicitly religious activity.
Likewise, it is important to emphasize that the restrictions on
explicit religious content apply to content generated by the
administrators of the program receiving direct Federal financial
assistance, not to spontaneous comments made by individual
beneficiaries about their personal lives in the context of these
programs. For example, if a person administering a federally funded job
skills program asks beneficiaries to describe how they gain the
motivation necessary for their job searches and some beneficiaries
refer to their faith or membership in a faith community, these kinds of
comments do not violate the restrictions and should not be censored. In
this context, it is clear that the administrator of the government
program did not orchestrate or encourage such comments.
USAID, therefore, proposes to amend its regulations to replace the
term ``inherently religious activities'' with the term ``explicitly
religious activities'' and define the latter term as ``including
activities that involve overt religious content such as worship,
religious instruction, or proselytization.'' These changes in language
will provide greater clarity and more closely match constitutional
standards as they have been developed in case law.
These restrictions would not diminish existing regulatory
protections for the religious identity of faith-based providers. The
proposed rule would not affect, for example, organizations' ability to
use religious terms in their organizational names, select board members
on a religious basis, include religious references in mission
statements and other organizational documents, and post religious art,
messages, scriptures and symbols in buildings where Federal financial
assistance is delivered.
Intermediaries
USAID proposes language that will clarify that organizations who
receive USAID financial assistance through subawards must comply with
the requirements relating to protections for beneficiaries and the
restrictions on prohibited uses of federal financial assistance. The
language of USAID's rule has always couched the requirements in the
rule as applying to organizations ``that receive direct financial
assistance from USAID,'' which by its terms includes any organizations
that receive such assistance, whether they did so through a prime award
or a sub-award. However, to avoid any doubt, USAID proposes to add
language explicitly stating that the requirements of the rule apply to
organizations ``that receive direct financial assistance from USAID
(including through a prime award or sub-award).''
Protections for Beneficiaries
Executive Order 13559 makes it clear that all organizations that
receive Federal financial assistance for the purpose of delivering
social welfare services are prohibited from discriminating against
beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries of those programs on the basis
of religion, a religious belief, refusal to hold a religious belief, or
a refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice. It also
states that organizations offering explicitly religious activities
(including activities that involve overt religious content such as
worship, religious instruction or proselytization) must not use direct
Federal financial assistance to subsidize or support those activities,
and that any explicitly religious activities must be offered outside of
programs that are supported with direct Federal financial assistance
(including through prime awards or sub-awards). In other words, to the
extent that an organization provides explicitly religious activities,
those activities must be offered separately in time or location from
programs or services supported with direct Federal financial
assistance. And, as noted above, participation in those religious
activities must be completely voluntary for beneficiaries of programs
supported by Federal financial assistance. USAID proposes to add
language to the sections of its rule covering these concepts to conform
[[Page 47240]]
more directly to the Executive Order language.
Political or Religious Affiliation
The proposed rule provides that decisions about awards of Federal
financial assistance must be free from political interference or even
the appearance of such interference. USAID must instruct participants
in the awarding process to refrain from taking religious affiliations
or non-religious affiliations into account in this process; i.e., an
organization should not receive favorable or unfavorable marks merely
because it is affiliated or unaffiliated with a religious body, or
related or unrelated to a specific religion. When selecting peer
reviewers, the awarding entity should never ask about religious
affiliation or take such matters into account. But it should encourage
religious, political and professional diversity among peer reviewers by
advertising for these positions in a wide variety of venues.
III. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, is not
subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804. The main effect of the rule is to provide clarifying
language around the types of activities that may be funded with Federal
financial assistance, thereby preventing confusion in stakeholders and
lessening the need for stakeholders to consult USAID for clarification
on appropriate activities.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), USAID has considered the economic
impact of the proposed rule. USAID certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Paperwork Burden
This proposed rule does not impose any new recordkeeping
requirements nor does it change or modify an existing information
collection activity. Thus, the Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply
to this proposed rule.
List of Subjects of 22 CFR Part 205
Foreign aid, Grant programs, Nonprofit organizations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, USAID proposes to amend
chapter II of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 205--PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN USAID
PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 205 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2381(a).
0
2. Amend Sec. 205.1 by revising paragraphs (b), (c), (e), and (f), and
adding paragraph (j), to read as follows:
Sec. 205.1 Grants and cooperative agreements.
* * * * *
(b) Organizations that receive direct financial assistance from
USAID under any USAID program (including through a prime award or sub-
award) may not engage in explicitly religious activities (including
activities that involve overt religious content such as worship,
religious instruction, or proselytization), as part of the programs or
services directly funded with direct financial assistance from USAID.
If an organization conducts such activities, the activities must be
offered separately, in time or location, from the programs or services
funded with direct financial assistance from USAID, and participation
must be voluntary for beneficiaries of the programs or services funded
with such assistance. These restrictions on explicitly religious
activities do not apply to programs where USAID funds are provided to
chaplains to work with inmates in prisons, detention facilities, or
community correction centers, or where USAID funds are provided to
religious or other organizations for programs in prisons, detention
facilities, or community correction centers, in which such
organizations assist chaplains in carrying out their duties.
(c) A religious organization that applies for, or participates in,
USAID-funded programs or services (including through a prime award or
sub-award) may retain its independence and may continue to carry out
its mission, including the definition, development, practice, and
expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use
direct financial assistance from USAID (including through a prime award
or sub-award) to support or engage in any explicitly religious
activities (including activities that involve overt religious content
such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization), or in any
other manner prohibited by law. Among other things, a religious
organization that receives financial assistance from USAID may use
space in its facilities, without removing religious art, icons,
scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a religious
organization that receives financial assistance from USAID retains its
authority over its internal governance, and it may retain religious
terms in its organization's name, select its board members on a
religious basis, and include religious references in its organization's
mission statements and other governing documents.
* * * * *
(e) An organization that participates in programs funded by
financial assistance from USAID (including through a prime award or
sub-award) shall not, in providing services, discriminate against a
program beneficiary or potential program beneficiary on the basis of
religion or religious belief, refusal to hold a religious belief, or a
refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice.
(f) No grant document, contract, agreement, covenant, memorandum of
understanding, policy, or regulation that is used by USAID shall
require only religious organizations to provide assurances that they
will not use monies or property for explicitly religious activities
(including activities that involve overt religious content such as
worship, religious instruction, or proselytization). Any such
restrictions shall apply equally to religious and secular
organizations. All organizations that participate in USAID programs
(including through a prime award or sub-award), including religious
ones, must carry out eligible activities in accordance with all program
requirements and other applicable requirements governing the conduct of
USAID-funded activities, including those prohibiting the use of direct
financial assistance from USAID to engage in explicitly religious
activities. No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of
understanding, policy, or regulation that is used by USAID shall
disqualify religious organizations from participating in USAID's
programs because such organizations are motivated or influenced by
religious faith to provide social services, or because of their
religious character or affiliation.
* * * * *
[[Page 47241]]
(j) Decisions about awards of USAID financial assistance must be
free from political interference or even the appearance of such
interference and must be made on the basis of merit, not on the basis
of religion or religious belief.
Dated: April 16, 2015.
Mark Brinkmoeller,
Director, Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.
Editorial note: This document was received for publication by
the Office of the Federal Register on July 21, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015-18261 Filed 8-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P