Guidance on the Procedures and Process To Petition the Secretary Under the Airport and Airways Improvement Act, 46380-46382 [2015-19144]
Download as PDF
46380
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 149 / Tuesday, August 4, 2015 / Notices
whole or in part, no later September 3,
2015.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The Upper Cumberland Regional
Airport is proposing the release of two
tracts of property consisting of 10.33
acres and 36.84 acres to allow the
property to be used as wetland
mitigation for projects in the area
unrelated to the airport. These
properties are non-contiguous to the
airport and located on Breeding Swamp
Road approximately 3 miles southeast of
the airport and Franks Ferry Road
approximately 13 miles southwest of the
airport.
Any person may inspect, by
appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Issued in Memphis, TN on July 28, 2015.
Phillip J. Braden,
Manager, Memphis Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2015–19141 Filed 8–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2015–2836]
Guidance on the Procedures and
Process To Petition the Secretary
Under the Airport and Airways
Improvement Act
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) is issuing
guidance on the procedures and process
to petition the Secretary under 49 U.S.C.
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Airport and
Airways Improvement Act of 1982, as
amended. Although this provision has
been in effect since 1992, the FAA did
not receive the first petition under this
provision until 2010. This guidance is
intended to provide detail and clarity
about who may petition the Secretary,
when such a petition may be filed, how
the petition may be made, and the
procedures and process to petition the
Secretary under this Section of the
Airport and Airways Improvement Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 5, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2015–2836
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:45 Aug 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Daphne Fuller, Assistant Chief Counsel.
Mailing address: Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone:
(202) 267–3199. Email address:
Daphne.Fuller@faa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FAA
requests comments, suggestions and
recommendations that will assist the
agency in assessing and understanding
the potential effects and implications of
providing guidance on the procedures
for and process of the right to petition
the Secretary under 49 U.S.C. Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
I. Background
In 1982, Congress enacted the Airport
and Airway Improvement Act (AAIA)
(Pub. L. 97–248). Relevant portions of
the AAIA are codified in 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 471, Subchapter I, Airport
Improvement. The AAIA, among other
items, established the current-day
Airport Improvement Program (AIP) that
is administered by the FAA’s Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Airports. Through the AIP, the FAA
provides grants to public agencies —
and, in limited cases, to private airport
owners and operators—for the planning
and development of public-use airports
that are included in the National Plan of
Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS).
The current AIP program built on earlier
grant programs that are funded through
a variety of user fees and fuel taxes. For
more information on the history of the
AIP and predecessor grant programs, see
https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/.
The AAIA also provides certain
prerequisites and conditions that an
airport sponsor must meet in order to be
eligible for consideration of AIP
funding. In 1992, Congress amended
various provisions of the AAIA with the
Airport and Airway Safety, Capacity,
Noise Improvement, and Intermodal
Transportation Act, Pub. L. 102–581.
Section 113(b), Public Access and
Participation with Respect to Airport
Projects, amended Section 509(b)(6)(A)
of the AAIA (49 U.S.C. 47106(c)(1)(A))
by inserting the following:
(ii) the sponsor of the project certifies to
the Secretary that the airport management
board either has voting representation from
the communities where the project is located
or has advised the communities that they
have the right to petition the Secretary
concerning a proposed project.
The Secretary of the U.S. Department
of Transportation has delegated the
responsibility to respond to a petition
under Section 47106 to the
Administrator of the FAA, 49 CFR
1.83(a)(9). The Administrator has
further delegated the authority to
administer this provision to the
Associate Administrator for the Office of
Airports (ARP–1). Order 1100.154A.1
The requirement for a sponsor to
provide such certification to the FAA is
incorporated into FAA Order 5050.4B,
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Implementing Instructions for
Airport Actions, par. 1203.
II. Purpose
After receiving a small number of
submissions under this provision, the
Associate Administrator for the Office of
Airports has determined it would be
helpful and appropriate to provide the
public with more guidance on the
procedures and processes associated
with this provision:
The Secretary may approve an application
under this subchapter for an airport
development project involving the location of
an airport or runway or a major runway
extension only if the sponsor certifies to the
Secretary that the airport management board
1 For clarity, this guidance will continue to use
the term ‘‘Secretary’’ in this context.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 149 / Tuesday, August 4, 2015 / Notices
has voting representation from the
communities in which the project is located
or has advised the communities that they
have the right to petition the Secretary about
a proposed project[.]
49 U.S.C. Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).2
III. Proposed Guidance
A. Where To File
The Secretary of the U.S. Department
of Transportation has delegated the
responsibility to respond to a petition
under Section 47106 to the
Administrator of the FAA. Accordingly,
any petition under this statutory
provision should be addressed to the
Associate Administrator for the Office of
Airports, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591.
B. Form and Substance
The statute does not prescribe any
specific format prescribed for the
submission of a petition. The petition
should be a concise statement
describing the project to which the
petitioner objects, and clearly indicating
the petitioner’s specific objection to the
project. The petition must also include
a description of the result the petitioner
is seeking. The petition should normally
not exceed ten (10) pages. Upon
application from the petitioner, the
Administrator will consider extending
the length of a petition for a large,
complex project. Petitions must be
legible and must be signed by the
petitioner(s), who must be a duly
authorized representative(s) of the
community (see Section III.D.4 of this
Federal Register notice). The FAA will
not consider any petition that is not
signed by the petitioner(s).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Time To File a Petition
A petition filed under section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) should be filed only
after the Airport Sponsor notifies a
community of its right to file a petition.
Petitions to the Secretary pursuant to
Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) must be
submitted within thirty (30) days after
the FAA gives notice that the sponsor
has presented evidence that the
requirements of Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) have been fulfilled.
Although the environmental analysis
and the grant decisions are separate
processes and decision, grant-related
findings that are preconditions of
2 As a starting point, the FAA notes that it is
unable to locate any legislative history for Section
47106(c) that would be helpful in determining the
Congressional intent with respect with
requirements of the statute. In interpreting this
section, the Secretary is guided by context and the
common meaning of the terms as informed by his
understanding of airports and the airport
development process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:45 Aug 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
issuing a grant are often made in the
environmental ROD. Typically, the FAA
demonstrates that the sponsor has
satisfied the requirements of Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) in its Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
Generally, the FEIS will contain a
certification from the Airport Sponsor
either that each community in which
the project is located has a voting
member on its airport management
board, or that each community in which
the project is located has been advised
of its right to petition the Secretary.
Normally the Airport Sponsor will have
notified each of the communities prior
to the publication of an FEIS, allowing
communities at least 30 days to prepare
and file a petition.3 The thirty-day time
to file ensures that communities without
voting representation on the airport
management board have the same
ability to object to or provide input on
a project prior to a final decision that
grant-related preconditions have been
met as those communities that do have
voting representation on the airport
management board. Additionally, the
30-day period coincides with the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
(CEQ) requirement that imposes a 30day ‘‘cooling off’’ period on federal
agencies between the publication of an
FEIS and a Record of Decision (ROD).
However, the FAA may also provide
notice that the sponsor has fulfilled the
requirements of Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) through a Draft EA, a
Final EA, a Draft EIS, or via a separate
Federal Register Notice. This type of
FAA notice would also start the 30-day
time limit for a community to file a
petition pursuant to Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
D. Definitions
(1) Location of an Airport
For purposes of Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii), location of an airport
means approval of an airport at a
location where no airport exists. This
definition is consistent with the
definition of the term airport location
approval found in FAA Order 5050.4B,
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Implementing Instructions for
Airport Actions (April 2006). Order
5050.4B defines airport location
approval as approval of a new public
use airport at a location where no
airport exists. (Order 5050.4B, ¶¶ 9.p
3 Should the FAA prepare an Environmental
Assessment (EA) for a project to which
§ 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) applies, or an EIS under MAP–
21, Section 1319, the time to file a petition to the
Secretary will begin to run when the community is
informed of its right to file such a petition by the
airport sponsor and will expire 30 days after such
notification.
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46381
and 203). In interpreting Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii), it is appropriate to be
consistent with other FAA
interpretations of similar terms.
Defining the term location of an airport
consistently with the definition in the
most current version of Order 5050.4B
avoids confusion that could be caused
by applying different definitions
depending on the circumstances of the
inquiry.
(2) Location of a Runway
While other FAA documents have
referred to the location of a runway,
none have defined the term. Because the
term is similar to the term ‘‘location of
an airport,’’ it is appropriate to define
the terms in a similar manner. For
purposes of Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii),
location of a runway refers to decisions
approving the site of a new or relocated
runway where a runway does not
currently exist.
(3) Major Runway Extension
Order 5050.4B defines a major
runway extension as one that creates a
significant impact to an affected
environmental resource (including
noise), or one that permanently removes
a relocated threshold.4 Removal of a
dislocated threshold is not considered a
runway extension.5 The definition of
major runway extension that appears in
Order 5050.4B, ¶9.l will be used in
interpreting Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
(4) Communities in Which the Project Is
Located
The term community is not defined in
the statute. In the enabling legislation,
this provision was entitled ‘‘Public
Participation With Respect to Airport
Projects.’’ The term ‘‘community’’ will
be defined as a jurisdictional authority,
that is, a political subdivision of a state,
such as a town, township, city, or
county. Defining community as a
jurisdictional authority is consistent
with the context of Section 47106(c).
For example, in subsection (A)(i) the
statute speaks of ‘‘objectives of any
planning that the community has
carried out.’’ Typically, only political
subdivisions of a state, such as those
described above, would have planning
authority. Similarly, in the FAA’s
experience, only a jurisdictional
authority or political subdivision would
be considered for voting representation
on the airport’s governing authority. It is
only in the absence of such voting
representation of a jurisdictional
authority or political subdivision that
4 A relocated threshold leaves the pavement
usable only for taxiing.
5 Pavement beyond a dislocated threshold is
available for takeoff.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
46382
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 149 / Tuesday, August 4, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the statute provides the opportunity to
petition the Secretary.
Defining community as a
jurisdictional authority or political
subdivision is also consistent with the
definition of community in Order
5050.4B, ¶1203(b)(1).
Accordingly, only a political
subdivision of a state that enjoys general
jurisdiction, or a Tribal government
meets the definition of community in
this context. Political subdivisions of a
state that have a specific, substantive
authority, such as water districts or
school districts, do not adequately
represent the interests of the community
at large. They are not required to
balance the interests of the whole
community on a wide range of issues.
Rather, they seek to promote their
specific substantive interest.
Additionally, water districts or school
districts would not normally be invited
to sit on an airport management board.
Thus, only a political subdivision of a
state which enjoys general jurisdiction
is a community entitled to file a petition
under Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
Finally, under the statute, a
community is only eligible to petition
under Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) if the
project is located in the community. If
land is disturbed in the community,
then the project is considered to be
located in that community. The courts
have also provided instruction on when
a project is located in a community. In
City of Bridgeton v. FAA, 212 F. 3d 448
(8th Cir. 2000), the court determined
that a community in which there was no
construction and no significant noise
impact could not challenge the failure to
notify it that it could petition the
Secretary. Thus, outside the
construction context, a project may be
located in a community only if the
project will have a significant impact on
the community. For example, where a
project will cause a significant noise
impact on a community, the project is
located in that community. If the project
does not create a significant impact in
the community, the community will
have no right to petition the Secretary.
E. Other Considerations
There are currently ten states that
participate in the FAA’s State Block
Grant Program (SBGP). Under the
program, the State agency (usually the
aviation division of the state
Department of Transportation) assumes
responsibility for administering AIP
grants and if applicable, discretionary
grants for non-primary airports. See 49
U.S.C. Section 47128. As part of the
responsibility, the state assumes various
responsibilities for the FAA including
reviewing and approving proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:45 Aug 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
changes to the Airport Layout Plan
(ALP) and compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The FAA interprets 49 U.S.C. Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) as not being
applicable to a project approved and
administered as part of a state block
grant. The plain language of this
statutory provision states that this
Section is triggered when a proponent
submits a project grant application to
the FAA. In the case of the SBGP, no
such request is made as the funds are
given to the states as a block and the
state assumes responsibility for
administering those funds. Participants
in the SBGP are required to engage
communities according to FAA
guidance and to circulate the draft EA
if warranted. Some who have sought to
use this provision have argued that it
should apply to State Block Grant
projects. The FAA invites comments on
this interpretation.
F. Agency Response
The FAA will provide a written
response to a petition to the Secretary.
The FAA may respond by outlining the
issues raised in the petition and
providing its responses either within the
environmental record of decision, or it
may elect to respond in a separate
document.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii), 14
CFR part 1.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 29,
2015.
Elliott Black,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and
Programming APP–001.
[FR Doc. 2015–19144 Filed 8–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision (ROD) for the Cal Black
Memorial Airport, Halls Crossing
Replacement Airport
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
the Federal Aviation Administration
announces the availability of the Record
of Decision for the Cal Black Memorial
Airport, replacement airport for the
Halls Crossing Airport.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Copies of the ROD may be
viewed during regular business hours at
the following locations:
1. Federal Aviation Administration
Airports Division, Suite 315, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057.
2. Federal Aviation Administration,
Airports District Office, Suite 224,
26805 East 68th Avenue, Denver, CO
80249.
3. San Juan County Courthouse,
County Executive Office, 117 S. Main,
Monticello, Utah 84535.
The ROD will also be available on the
following Web site: https://
halls.crossing.airportnetwork.com/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janell Barrilleaux, Environmental
Program Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration Airports Division,
Northwest Mountain Region, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057. Mrs.
Barrilleaux may be contacted during
business hours at (425) 227–2611
(phone), (425) 227–1600 (fax), or via
email at Janell.Barrilleaux@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Halls
Crossing replacement airport was
originally proposed in 1966 due to the
inadequacy of the existing Halls
Crossing airstrip. After completion of
numerous planning studies, the Federal
Aviation Administration completed an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
(June, 1990) with the cooperation of the
National Park Service (NPS) and the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM). A
Record of Decision (ROD) was issued in
August 1990 approving the
development of what is now named the
Cal Black Memorial Airport.
Concurrently, the BLM approved an
amendment of a land plan which
allowed the conveyance of land to San
Juan County for the construction of the
new airport.
In 1990, the National Parks
Conservation Association (NPCA),1 et
al.2 brought suit concerning the
adequacy of the 1990 Final EIS and the
adequacy of the BLM plan amendment
and land transfer process. In its July 7,
1993 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Tenth Circuit concluded that
‘‘the action of FAA approving the
project based on a finding of ‘no
significant impact’ and ‘no significant
adverse impact’ [was] arbitrary and
capricious.’’ The court proceeding
stated:
ADDRESSES:
1 Note: The title of the organization as
documented in the 1993 United States Court of
Appeals case National Parks Conservation
Association, et al. v Federal Aviation
Administration, et al.
2 Other parties to the suit included the Southern
Utah Wilderness Alliance, the Sierra Club, and
Deborah L. Threedy.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46380-46382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA-2015-2836]
Guidance on the Procedures and Process To Petition the Secretary
Under the Airport and Airways Improvement Act
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing guidance
on the procedures and process to petition the Secretary under 49 U.S.C.
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Airport and Airways Improvement Act of 1982,
as amended. Although this provision has been in effect since 1992, the
FAA did not receive the first petition under this provision until 2010.
This guidance is intended to provide detail and clarity about who may
petition the Secretary, when such a petition may be filed, how the
petition may be made, and the procedures and process to petition the
Secretary under this Section of the Airport and Airways Improvement
Act.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 5, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2015-2836
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Daphne Fuller, Assistant Chief
Counsel. Mailing address: Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone: (202) 267-3199.
Email address: Daphne.Fuller@faa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FAA requests comments, suggestions and
recommendations that will assist the agency in assessing and
understanding the potential effects and implications of providing
guidance on the procedures for and process of the right to petition the
Secretary under 49 U.S.C. Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
I. Background
In 1982, Congress enacted the Airport and Airway Improvement Act
(AAIA) (Pub. L. 97-248). Relevant portions of the AAIA are codified in
49 U.S.C. Chapter 471, Subchapter I, Airport Improvement. The AAIA,
among other items, established the current-day Airport Improvement
Program (AIP) that is administered by the FAA's Office of Airports.
Through the AIP, the FAA provides grants to public agencies -- and, in
limited cases, to private airport owners and operators--for the
planning and development of public-use airports that are included in
the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). The current
AIP program built on earlier grant programs that are funded through a
variety of user fees and fuel taxes. For more information on the
history of the AIP and predecessor grant programs, see https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/.
The AAIA also provides certain prerequisites and conditions that an
airport sponsor must meet in order to be eligible for consideration of
AIP funding. In 1992, Congress amended various provisions of the AAIA
with the Airport and Airway Safety, Capacity, Noise Improvement, and
Intermodal Transportation Act, Pub. L. 102-581. Section 113(b), Public
Access and Participation with Respect to Airport Projects, amended
Section 509(b)(6)(A) of the AAIA (49 U.S.C. 47106(c)(1)(A)) by
inserting the following:
(ii) the sponsor of the project certifies to the Secretary that
the airport management board either has voting representation from
the communities where the project is located or has advised the
communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary
concerning a proposed project.
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation has
delegated the responsibility to respond to a petition under Section
47106 to the Administrator of the FAA, 49 CFR 1.83(a)(9). The
Administrator has further delegated the authority to administer this
provision to the Associate Administrator for the Office of Airports
(ARP-1). Order 1100.154A.\1\ The requirement for a sponsor to provide
such certification to the FAA is incorporated into FAA Order 5050.4B,
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for
Airport Actions, par. 1203.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For clarity, this guidance will continue to use the term
``Secretary'' in this context.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Purpose
After receiving a small number of submissions under this provision,
the Associate Administrator for the Office of Airports has determined
it would be helpful and appropriate to provide the public with more
guidance on the procedures and processes associated with this
provision:
The Secretary may approve an application under this subchapter
for an airport development project involving the location of an
airport or runway or a major runway extension only if the sponsor
certifies to the Secretary that the airport management board
[[Page 46381]]
has voting representation from the communities in which the project
is located or has advised the communities that they have the right
to petition the Secretary about a proposed project[.]
49 U.S.C. Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As a starting point, the FAA notes that it is unable to
locate any legislative history for Section 47106(c) that would be
helpful in determining the Congressional intent with respect with
requirements of the statute. In interpreting this section, the
Secretary is guided by context and the common meaning of the terms
as informed by his understanding of airports and the airport
development process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proposed Guidance
A. Where To File
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation has
delegated the responsibility to respond to a petition under Section
47106 to the Administrator of the FAA. Accordingly, any petition under
this statutory provision should be addressed to the Associate
Administrator for the Office of Airports, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591.
B. Form and Substance
The statute does not prescribe any specific format prescribed for
the submission of a petition. The petition should be a concise
statement describing the project to which the petitioner objects, and
clearly indicating the petitioner's specific objection to the project.
The petition must also include a description of the result the
petitioner is seeking. The petition should normally not exceed ten (10)
pages. Upon application from the petitioner, the Administrator will
consider extending the length of a petition for a large, complex
project. Petitions must be legible and must be signed by the
petitioner(s), who must be a duly authorized representative(s) of the
community (see Section III.D.4 of this Federal Register notice). The
FAA will not consider any petition that is not signed by the
petitioner(s).
C. Time To File a Petition
A petition filed under section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) should be filed
only after the Airport Sponsor notifies a community of its right to
file a petition.
Petitions to the Secretary pursuant to Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii)
must be submitted within thirty (30) days after the FAA gives notice
that the sponsor has presented evidence that the requirements of
Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) have been fulfilled. Although the
environmental analysis and the grant decisions are separate processes
and decision, grant-related findings that are preconditions of issuing
a grant are often made in the environmental ROD. Typically, the FAA
demonstrates that the sponsor has satisfied the requirements of Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) in its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
Generally, the FEIS will contain a certification from the Airport
Sponsor either that each community in which the project is located has
a voting member on its airport management board, or that each community
in which the project is located has been advised of its right to
petition the Secretary. Normally the Airport Sponsor will have notified
each of the communities prior to the publication of an FEIS, allowing
communities at least 30 days to prepare and file a petition.\3\ The
thirty-day time to file ensures that communities without voting
representation on the airport management board have the same ability to
object to or provide input on a project prior to a final decision that
grant-related preconditions have been met as those communities that do
have voting representation on the airport management board.
Additionally, the 30-day period coincides with the Council on
Environmental Quality's (CEQ) requirement that imposes a 30-day
``cooling off'' period on federal agencies between the publication of
an FEIS and a Record of Decision (ROD). However, the FAA may also
provide notice that the sponsor has fulfilled the requirements of
Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) through a Draft EA, a Final EA, a Draft EIS,
or via a separate Federal Register Notice. This type of FAA notice
would also start the 30-day time limit for a community to file a
petition pursuant to Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Should the FAA prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for
a project to which Sec. 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) applies, or an EIS under
MAP-21, Section 1319, the time to file a petition to the Secretary
will begin to run when the community is informed of its right to
file such a petition by the airport sponsor and will expire 30 days
after such notification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Definitions
(1) Location of an Airport
For purposes of Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii), location of an airport
means approval of an airport at a location where no airport exists.
This definition is consistent with the definition of the term airport
location approval found in FAA Order 5050.4B, National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions (April
2006). Order 5050.4B defines airport location approval as approval of a
new public use airport at a location where no airport exists. (Order
5050.4B, ]] 9.p and 203). In interpreting Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii),
it is appropriate to be consistent with other FAA interpretations of
similar terms. Defining the term location of an airport consistently
with the definition in the most current version of Order 5050.4B avoids
confusion that could be caused by applying different definitions
depending on the circumstances of the inquiry.
(2) Location of a Runway
While other FAA documents have referred to the location of a
runway, none have defined the term. Because the term is similar to the
term ``location of an airport,'' it is appropriate to define the terms
in a similar manner. For purposes of Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii),
location of a runway refers to decisions approving the site of a new or
relocated runway where a runway does not currently exist.
(3) Major Runway Extension
Order 5050.4B defines a major runway extension as one that creates
a significant impact to an affected environmental resource (including
noise), or one that permanently removes a relocated threshold.\4\
Removal of a dislocated threshold is not considered a runway
extension.\5\ The definition of major runway extension that appears in
Order 5050.4B, ]9.l will be used in interpreting Section
47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A relocated threshold leaves the pavement usable only for
taxiing.
\5\ Pavement beyond a dislocated threshold is available for
takeoff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Communities in Which the Project Is Located
The term community is not defined in the statute. In the enabling
legislation, this provision was entitled ``Public Participation With
Respect to Airport Projects.'' The term ``community'' will be defined
as a jurisdictional authority, that is, a political subdivision of a
state, such as a town, township, city, or county. Defining community as
a jurisdictional authority is consistent with the context of Section
47106(c). For example, in subsection (A)(i) the statute speaks of
``objectives of any planning that the community has carried out.''
Typically, only political subdivisions of a state, such as those
described above, would have planning authority. Similarly, in the FAA's
experience, only a jurisdictional authority or political subdivision
would be considered for voting representation on the airport's
governing authority. It is only in the absence of such voting
representation of a jurisdictional authority or political subdivision
that
[[Page 46382]]
the statute provides the opportunity to petition the Secretary.
Defining community as a jurisdictional authority or political
subdivision is also consistent with the definition of community in
Order 5050.4B, ]1203(b)(1).
Accordingly, only a political subdivision of a state that enjoys
general jurisdiction, or a Tribal government meets the definition of
community in this context. Political subdivisions of a state that have
a specific, substantive authority, such as water districts or school
districts, do not adequately represent the interests of the community
at large. They are not required to balance the interests of the whole
community on a wide range of issues. Rather, they seek to promote their
specific substantive interest. Additionally, water districts or school
districts would not normally be invited to sit on an airport management
board. Thus, only a political subdivision of a state which enjoys
general jurisdiction is a community entitled to file a petition under
Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii).
Finally, under the statute, a community is only eligible to
petition under Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) if the project is located in
the community. If land is disturbed in the community, then the project
is considered to be located in that community. The courts have also
provided instruction on when a project is located in a community. In
City of Bridgeton v. FAA, 212 F. 3d 448 (8th Cir. 2000), the court
determined that a community in which there was no construction and no
significant noise impact could not challenge the failure to notify it
that it could petition the Secretary. Thus, outside the construction
context, a project may be located in a community only if the project
will have a significant impact on the community. For example, where a
project will cause a significant noise impact on a community, the
project is located in that community. If the project does not create a
significant impact in the community, the community will have no right
to petition the Secretary.
E. Other Considerations
There are currently ten states that participate in the FAA's State
Block Grant Program (SBGP). Under the program, the State agency
(usually the aviation division of the state Department of
Transportation) assumes responsibility for administering AIP grants and
if applicable, discretionary grants for non-primary airports. See 49
U.S.C. Section 47128. As part of the responsibility, the state assumes
various responsibilities for the FAA including reviewing and approving
proposed changes to the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) and compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The FAA interprets 49 U.S.C. Section 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii) as not
being applicable to a project approved and administered as part of a
state block grant. The plain language of this statutory provision
states that this Section is triggered when a proponent submits a
project grant application to the FAA. In the case of the SBGP, no such
request is made as the funds are given to the states as a block and the
state assumes responsibility for administering those funds.
Participants in the SBGP are required to engage communities according
to FAA guidance and to circulate the draft EA if warranted. Some who
have sought to use this provision have argued that it should apply to
State Block Grant projects. The FAA invites comments on this
interpretation.
F. Agency Response
The FAA will provide a written response to a petition to the
Secretary. The FAA may respond by outlining the issues raised in the
petition and providing its responses either within the environmental
record of decision, or it may elect to respond in a separate document.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 47106(c)(1)(A)(ii), 14 CFR part 1.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 29, 2015.
Elliott Black,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and Programming APP-001.
[FR Doc. 2015-19144 Filed 8-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P