Prescription Drug User Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016, 46028-46032 [2015-18914]
Download as PDF
46028
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
makes it possible to evaluate the
effectiveness of some process changes
and intervention strategies in reducing
the risk of listeriosis.
ADDRESSES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the QRA and related
documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherri Dennis, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–005), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
240–402–1914.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of February
11, 2013 (78 FR 9701), we made
available a document entitled ‘‘Draft
Joint Food and Drug Administration/
´
Health Canada—Sante Canada
Quantitative Assessment of the Risk of
Listeriosis From Soft-Ripened Cheese
Consumption in the United States and
Canada.’’ We gave interested parties an
opportunity to submit comments by
April 29, 2013, for us to consider on the
approach used, the assumptions made,
the modeling techniques, the data used,
and the clarity and the transparency of
the QRA documentation. We received
nearly 100 comments on the draft QRA
and have revised the QRA where
appropriate (See Refs. 1 to 5).
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, we are issuing a notice
requesting comments and scientific data
and information that would assist us in
understanding potential intervention
measures to reduce the risk of foodborne
illness from consumption of cheeses
manufactured from unpasteurized milk.
II. Electronic Access
The QRA and related documents are
available electronically on the FDA Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/Food/Food
ScienceResearch/RiskSafety
Assessment/default.htm, https://
www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/Special
Topics/PeerReviewofScientific
InformationandAssessments/
ucm079120.htm, and https://
www.regulations.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. (FDA has verified
the Web site addresses in this reference
section, but we are not responsible for
any subsequent changes to the Web sites
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jul 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
1. FDA and Health Canada, ‘‘Joint Food and
Drug Administration/Health Canada—
´
Sante Canada Quantitative Assessment
of the Risk of Listeriosis from SoftRipened Cheese Consumption in the
United States and Canada: Interpretative
Summary,’’ 2015. Accessible at https://
www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScience
Research/RiskSafetyAssessment/
default.htm and https://www.fda.gov/
ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Peer
ReviewofScientificInformationand
Assessments/ucm079120.htm.
2. FDA and Health Canada, ‘‘Joint Food and
Drug Administration/Health Canada—
´
Sante Canada Quantitative Assessment
of the Risk of Listeriosis from SoftRipened Cheese Consumption in the
United States and Canada: Technical
Report,’’ 2015. Accessible at https://
www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScience
Research/RiskSafetyAssessment/
default.htm and https://www.fda.gov/
ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Peer
ReviewofScientificInformationand
Assessments/ucm079120.htm.
3. FDA and Health Canada, ‘‘Joint Food and
Drug Administration/Health Canada—
´
Sante Canada Quantitative Assessment
of the Risk of Listeriosis from SoftRipened Cheese Consumption in the
United States and Canada: Technical
Report Appendices,’’ 2015. Accessible at
https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScience
Research/RiskSafetyAssessment/
default.htm and https://www.fda.gov/
ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Peer
ReviewofScientificInformationand
Assessments/ucm079120.htm.
4. FDA and Health Canada, ‘‘Joint Food and
Drug Administration/Health Canada—
´
Sante Canada Quantitative Assessment
of the Risk of Listeriosis from SoftRipened Cheese Consumption in the
United States and Canada: Risk
Assessment Model,’’ 2015. Accessible at
https://www.fda.gov/Food/
FoodScienceResearch/
RiskSafetyAssessment/default.htm and
https://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/
SpecialTopics/PeerReviewofScientific
InformationandAssessments/
ucm079120.htm.
5. Joint FDA/Health Canada Quantitative
Assessment of the Risk of Listeriosis
from Soft-Ripened Cheese Consumption
in the United States and Canada: Replies
to Public Comments, 2015. Accessible at
https://www.fda.gov/Food/
FoodScienceResearch/
RiskSafetyAssessment/default.htm and
https://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/
SpecialTopics/PeerReviewofScientific
InformationandAssessments/
ucm079120.htm.
Food and Drug Administration
Dated: July 29, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–18960 Filed 7–31–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0007]
Prescription Drug User Fee Rates for
Fiscal Year 2016
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
rates for prescription drug user fees for
fiscal year (FY) 2016. The Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act),
as amended by the Prescription Drug
User Fee Amendments of 2012 (PDUFA
V), authorizes FDA to collect user fees
for certain applications for the review of
human drug and biological products, on
establishments where the products are
made, and on such products. This
notice establishes the fee rates for FY
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of Financial
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd.,
COLE–14202F, Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002, 301–796–7223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Sections 735 and 736 of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 379g and 379h, respectively)
establish three different kinds of user
fees. Fees are assessed on the following:
(1) Certain types of applications and
supplements for the review of human
drug and biological products; (2) certain
establishments where such products are
made; and (3) certain products (section
736(a) of the FD&C Act). When certain
conditions are met, FDA may waive or
reduce fees (section 736(d) of the FD&C
Act).
For FY 2013 through FY 2017, the
base revenue amounts for the total
revenues from all PDUFA fees are
established by PDUFA V. The base
revenue amount for FY 2013, which
became the base amount for the
remaining 4 FYs of PDUFA V, is
$718,669,000, as published in the
Federal Register of August 1, 2012 (77
FR 45639). The FY 2013 base revenue
amount is further adjusted each year
after FY 2013 for inflation and
workload. Fees for applications,
establishments, and products are to be
established each year by FDA so that
revenues from each category will
provide one-third of the total revenue to
be collected each year.
This document provides fee rates for
FY 2016 for an application requiring
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
46029
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
clinical data ($2,374,200), for an
application not requiring clinical data or
a supplement requiring clinical data
($1,187,100), for an establishment
($585,200), and for a product
($114,450). These fees are effective on
October 1, 2015, and will remain in
effect through September 30, 2016. For
applications and supplements that are
submitted on or after October 1, 2015,
the new fee schedule must be used.
Invoices for establishment and product
fees for FY 2016 will be issued in
August 2015 using the new fee
schedule.
II. Fee Revenue Amount for FY 2016
The base revenue amount for FY 2016
is $718,669,000 prior to adjustments for
inflation and workload (see section
736(c)(1) and (c)(2) of the FD&C Act).
A. FY 2016 Statutory Fee Revenue
Adjustments for Inflation
PDUFA V specifies that the
$718,669,000 is to be further adjusted
for inflation increases for FY 2016 using
two separate adjustments—one for
personnel compensation and benefits
(PC&B) and one for non-PC&B costs (see
section 736(c)(1) of the FD&C Act).
The component of the inflation
adjustment for payroll costs shall be 1
plus the average annual percent change
in the cost of all PC&B paid per full-time
equivalent (FTE) position at FDA for the
first 3 of the preceding 4 FYs,
multiplied by the proportion of PC&B
costs to total FDA costs of process for
the review of human drug applications
for the first 3 of the preceding 4 FYs (see
section 736(c)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(B) of the
FD&C Act).
Table 1 summarizes that actual cost
and FTE data for the specified FYs, and
provides the percent changes from the
previous FYs and the average percent
changes over the first 3 of the 4 FYs
preceding FY 2016. The 3-year average
is 2.2328 percent.
TABLE 1—FDA PERSONNEL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS (PC&B) EACH YEAR AND PERCENT CHANGES
Fiscal year
2012
Total PC&B ..............................................................................
Total FTE .................................................................................
PC&B per FTE .........................................................................
Percent Change From Previous Year .....................................
The statute specifies that this 2.2328
percent should be multiplied by the
proportion of PC&B costs to total FDA
2013
$1,824,703,000
13,382
$136,355
3.1843%
2014
$1,927,703,000
13,974
$137,949
1.1690%
costs of the process for the review of
human drug applications. Table 2 shows
the PC&B and the total obligations for
3-Year average
$2,054,937,000
14,555
$141,184
2.3451%
..............................
..............................
..............................
2.2328%
the process for the review of human
drug applications for 3 FYs.
TABLE 2—PC&B AS A PERCENT OF FEE REVENUES SPENT ON THE PROCESS FOR THE REVIEW OF HUMAN DRUG
APPLICATIONS
Fiscal year
2012
Total PC&B ......................................
Total Costs .......................................
PC&B Percent ..................................
2013
$592,642,252
$1,032,419,218
57.4033%
The payroll adjustment is 2.2328
percent from table 1 multiplied by
56.8473 percent (or 1.2693 percent).
The statute specifies that the portion
of the inflation adjustment for nonpayroll costs is the average annual
percent change that occurred in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for urban
consumers (Washington-Baltimore, DC–
MD–VA–WV; not seasonally adjusted;
2014
$568,206,210
$966,169,007
58.8102%
all items; annual index) for the first 3
years of the preceding 4 years of
available data multiplied by the
proportion of all costs other than PC&B
costs to total costs of the process for the
review of human drug applications for
the first 3 years of the preceding 4 FYs
(see section 736(c)(1)(C) of the FD&C
Act). Table 3 provides the summary data
for the percent changes in the specified
3-Year average
$585,260,720
$1,077,263,695
54.3285%
........................................
........................................
56.8473%
CPI for the Washington-Baltimore area.
The data are published by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics and can be found on
their Web site at https://data.bls.gov/cgibin/surveymost?cu by checking the box
marked ‘‘Washington-Baltimore All
Items, November 1996=100—
CUURA311SA0’’ and then clicking on
the ‘‘Retrieve Data’’ button.
TABLE 3—ANNUAL AND 3-YEAR AVERAGE PERCENT CHANGE IN CPI FOR WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE AREA
Year
2012
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Annual CPI .......................................
Annual Percent Change ..................
150.212
2.2024%
To calculate the inflation adjustment
for non-payroll costs, we multiply the
1.7549 percent by the proportion of all
costs other than PC&B to total costs of
the process for the review of human
drug applications obligated. Since
56.8473 percent was obligated for PC&B
as shown in table 2, 43.1527 percent is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jul 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
2013
2014
152.500
1.5232%
the portion of costs other than PC&B
(100 percent minus 56.8473 percent
equals 43.1527 percent). The nonpayroll adjustment is 1.7549 percent
times 43.1527 percent, or 0.7573
percent.
Next, we add the payroll adjustment
(1.2693 percent) to the non-payroll
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3-Year average
154.847
1.5390%
........................................
1.7549%
adjustment (0.7573 percent), for a total
inflation adjustment of 2.0266 percent
(rounded) for FY 2016.
PDUFA V provides for this inflation
adjustment to be compounded after FY
2013 (see section 736(c)(1) of the FD&C
Act). This factor for FY 2016 (2.0266
percent) is compounded by adding 1
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
46030
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
and then multiplying by 1 plus the
compound inflation adjustment factor
for FY 2015 (4.327 percent), as
published in the Federal Register of
August 1, 2014 (79 FR 44807 at 44809),
which equals to 1.064414 (rounded)
(1.020266 times 1.04327) for FY 2016.
We then multiply the base revenue
amount for FY 2016 ($718,669,000) by
1.064414, yielding an inflation-adjusted
amount of $764,961,345.
B. FY 2016 Statutory Fee Revenue
Adjustments for Workload
The statute specifies that after the
$718,669,000 has been adjusted for
inflation, the inflation-adjusted amount
shall be further adjusted for workload
(see section 736(c)(2) of the FD&C Act).
To calculate the FY 2016 workload
adjustment, FDA calculated the average
number of each of the four types of
applications specified in the workload
adjustment provision: (1) Human drug
applications; (2) active commercial
investigational new drug applications
(INDs) (applications that have at least
one submission during the previous 12
months); (3) efficacy supplements; and
(4) manufacturing supplements received
over the 3-year period that ended on
June 30, 2012 (base years), and the
average number of each of these types
of applications over the most recent 3
year period that ended June 30, 2015.
The calculations are summarized in
table 4. The 3-year averages for each
application category are provided in
column 1 (‘‘3-Year Average Base Years
2010–2012’’) and column 2 (‘‘3-Year
Average 2013–2015’’). Column 3 reflects
the percent change in workload from
column 1 to column 2. Column 4 shows
the weighting factor for each type of
application, estimating how much of the
total FDA drug review workload was
accounted for by each type of
application in the table during the most
recent 3 years. Column 5 is the weighted
percent change in each category of
workload. This was derived by
multiplying the weighting factor in each
line in column 4 by the percent change
from the base years in column 3. The
sum of the values in column 5 is added,
reflecting an increase in workload of
11.31 percent (rounded) for FY 2016
when compared to the base years.
TABLE 4—WORKLOAD ADJUSTER CALCULATION FOR FY 2016
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Application type
3-Year
average base
years 2010–
2012
3-Year
average
2013–2015
Percent
change
(column 1 to
column 2)
Weighting
factor
(percent)
Weighted
percent
change
New Drug Applications/Biologics License Applications .......
Active Commercial INDs ......................................................
Efficacy Supplements ..........................................................
Manufacturing Supplements ................................................
FY 2016 Workload Adjuster .................................................
124.3
6830.0
136.3
2548.3
........................
148.3
7375.3
175.0
2386.7
........................
19.3081
7.9839
28.3933
¥6.3415
........................
38.9
39.2
6.0
16.0
........................
Table 5 shows the calculation of the
revenue amount for FY 2016. The
$718,669,000 subject to adjustment on
Line 1 is multiplied by the inflation
adjustment factor of 1.064414, resulting
in the inflation-adjusted amount on Line
3, $764,961,345. That amount is then
multiplied by one plus the workload
7.51
3.13
1.69
¥1.01
11.31
adjustment of 11.31 percent, resulting in
the inflation and workload adjusted
amount of $851,481,000 on Line 5,
rounded to the nearest thousand dollars.
TABLE 5—PDUFA REVENUE AMOUNT FOR FY 2016, SUMMARY CALCULATION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FY 2013 Revenue Amount and Base Subsequent FYs as published in the Federal Register of August 1, 2012
(77 FR 45639) (Rounded to nearest thousand dollars).
Inflation Adjustment Factor for FY 2016 (1 plus 6.4414 percent) ................................................................................
Inflation Adjusted Amount .............................................................................................................................................
Workload Adjustment Factor for FY 2016 (1 plus 11.31 percent) ................................................................................
Inflation and Workload Adjusted Amount (Rounded to nearest thousand dollars) ......................................................
PDUFA specifies that one-third of the
total fee revenue is to be derived from
application fees, one-third from
establishment fees, and one-third from
product fees (see section 736(b)(2) of the
FD&C Act). Accordingly, one-third of
the total revenue amount
($851,481,000), or a total of
$283,827,000, is the amount of fee
revenue that will be derived from each
of these fee categories: Application Fees,
Establishment Fees, and Product Fees.
III. Application Fee Calculations
A. Application Fee Revenues and
Application Fees
Application fees will be set to
generate one-third of the total fee
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jul 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
revenue amount, or $283,827,000 in FY
2016.
B. Estimate of the Number of Fee-Paying
Applications and Setting the
Application Fees
For FY 2013 through FY 2017, FDA
will estimate the total number of feepaying full application equivalents
(FAEs) it expects to receive the next FY
by averaging the number of fee-paying
FAEs received in the 3 most recently
completed FYs. Beginning with FY
2016, prior year FAE totals will be
updated annually to reflect refunds and
waivers processed after the close of the
FY.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$718,669,000
Line 1.
1.064414
$764,961,345
1.1131
$851,481,000
Line
Line
Line
Line
2.
3.
4.
5.
In estimating the number of feepaying FAEs, a full application
requiring clinical data counts as one
FAE. An application not requiring
clinical data counts as one-half of an
FAE, as does a supplement requiring
clinical data. An application that is
withdrawn, or refused for filing, counts
as one-fourth of an FAE if the applicant
initially paid a full application fee, or
one-eighth of an FAE if the applicant
initially paid one-half of the full
application fee amount.
As table 6 shows, the average number
of fee-paying FAEs received annually in
the most recent 3-year period is 119.545
FAEs. FDA will set fees for FY 2016
based on this estimate as the number of
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
46031
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
full application equivalents that will
pay fees.
TABLE 6—FEE-PAYING FAE 3-YEAR AVERAGE
FY
2012
Fee-Paying FAEs .............................................................................................
120.375
2013
109.510
3-Year average
2014
128.750
119.545
Beginning with FY 2016, prior year FAE totals will be updated annually to reflect refunds and waivers processed after the close of the FY.
The FY 2016 application fee is
estimated by dividing the average
number of full applications that paid
fees over the latest 3 years, 119.545, into
the fee revenue amount to be derived
from application fees in FY 2016,
$283,827,000. The result, rounded to the
nearest hundred dollars, is a fee of
$2,374,200 per full application requiring
clinical data, and $1,187,100 per
application not requiring clinical data or
per supplement requiring clinical data.
IV. Fee Calculations for Establishment
and Product Fees
A. Establishment Fees
At the beginning of FY 2015, the
establishment fee was based on an
estimate that 509 establishments would
be subject to and would pay fees. By the
end of FY 2015, FDA estimates that 516
establishments will have been billed for
establishment fees, before all decisions
on requests for waivers or reductions are
made. FDA estimates that a total of 15
establishment fee waivers or reductions
will be made for FY 2015. In addition,
FDA estimates that another 16 full
establishment fees will be exempted this
year based on the orphan drug
exemption in section 736(k) of the FD&C
Act. Subtracting 31 establishments (15
waivers, plus the estimated 16
establishments under the orphan
exemption) from 516 leaves a net of 485
fee-paying establishments. FDA will use
485 to estimate the FY 2016
establishments paying fees. The fee per
establishment is determined by dividing
the adjusted total fee revenue to be
derived from establishments
($283,827,000) by the estimated 485
establishments, for an establishment fee
rate for FY 2016 of $585,200 (rounded
to the nearest hundred dollars).
B. Product Fees
At the beginning of FY 2015, the
product fee was based on an estimate
that 2,434 products would be subject to
and would pay product fees. By the end
of FY 2015, FDA estimates that 2,554
products will have been billed for
product fees, before all decisions on
requests for waivers, reductions, or
exemptions are made. FDA assumes that
there will be 39 waivers and reductions
granted. In addition, FDA estimates that
another 35 product fees will be
exempted this year based on the orphan
drug exemption in section 736(k) of the
FD&C Act. FDA estimates that 2,480
products will qualify for and pay
product fees in FY 2015, after allowing
for an estimated 74 waivers and
reductions, including the orphan drug
products, and will use this number for
its FY 2016 estimate. The FY 2016
product fee rate is determined by
dividing the adjusted total fee revenue
to be derived from product fees
($283,827,000) by the estimated 2,480
products for a FY 2016 product fee of
$114,450 (rounded to the nearest ten
dollars).
V. Fee Schedule for FY 2016
The fee rates for FY 2016 are
displayed in table 7:
TABLE 7—FEE SCHEDULE FOR FY 2016
Fee rates for
FY 2016
Fee category
Applications:
Requiring clinical data ..................................................................................................................................................................
Not requiring clinical data .............................................................................................................................................................
Supplements requiring clinical data .............................................................................................................................................
Establishments .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Products ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
VI. Fee Payment Options and
Procedures
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Application Fees
The appropriate application fee
established in the new fee schedule
must be paid for any application or
supplement subject to fees under
PDUFA that is received on or after
October 1, 2015. Payment must be made
in U.S. currency by check, bank draft, or
U.S. postal money order payable to the
order of the Food and Drug
Administration. Please include the user
fee identification (ID) number on your
check, bank draft, or postal money
order. Your payment can be mailed to:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jul 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
Food and Drug Administration, P.O.
Box 979107, St. Louis, MO 63197–9000.
If checks are to be sent by a courier
that requests a street address, the
courier can deliver the checks to: U.S.
Bank, Attention: Government Lockbox
979107, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
Louis, MO 63101. (Note: This U.S. Bank
address is for courier delivery only.
Contact the U.S. Bank at 314–418–4013
if you have any questions concerning
courier delivery.)
Please make sure that the FDA post
office box number (P.O. Box 979107) is
written on the check, bank draft, or
postal money order.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$2,374,200
1,187,100
1,187,100
585,200
114,450
Wire transfer payment may also be
used. Please reference your unique user
fee ID number when completing your
transfer. The originating financial
institution may charge a wire transfer
fee. Please ask your financial institution
about the fee and add it to your payment
to ensure that your fee is fully paid. The
account information for wire transfers is
as follows: New York Federal Reserve
Bank, U.S. Department of the Treasury,
TREAS NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York,
NY 10045, Acct. No.: 75060099, Routing
No.: 021030004, SWIFT: FRNYUS33,
Beneficiary: FDA, 8455 Colesville Rd.,
14th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
46032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
Application fees can also be paid
online with an electronic check (ACH).
FDA has partnered with the U.S.
Department of the Treasury to use
Pay.gov, a Web-based payment
application, for online electronic
payment. The Pay.gov feature is
available on the FDA Web site after the
user fee ID number is generated.
The tax identification number of FDA
is 53–0196965.
B. Establishment and Product Fees
FDA will issue invoices for
establishment and product fees for FY
2016 under the new fee schedule in
August 2015. Payment will be due on
October 1, 2015. FDA will issue
invoices in November 2016 for any
products and establishments subject to
fees for FY 2016 that qualify for fee
assessments after the August 2015
billing.
Dated: July 28, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–18914 Filed 7–31–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–1358]
Recommendations for Premarket
Notification (510(k)) Submissions for
Nucleic Acid-Based Human Leukocyte
Antigen Test Kits Used for Matching of
Donors and Recipients in Transfusion
and Transplantation; Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a
document entitled ‘‘Recommendations
for Premarket Notification (510(k))
Submissions for Nucleic Acid-Based
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Test
Kits Used for Matching of Donors and
Recipients in Transfusion and
Transplantation; Guidance for
Industry.’’ The guidance document
provides recommendations to
submitters and FDA reviewers in
preparing and reviewing premarket
notification submissions (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘510(k) submission’’ or
‘‘510(k)’’) for HLA in vitro diagnostic
(IVD) device test kits. The guidance
applies specifically to nucleic acidbased HLA test kits used for the
matching of donors and recipients in
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jul 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
transfusion and transplantation,
whether testing is for a single locus or
for multiple loci simultaneously, for
which the premarket submission to FDA
will be a 510(k). The guidance
announced in this notice finalizes the
draft guidance of the same title dated
November 2013.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Office of Communication, Outreach, and
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist the office in processing your
requests. The guidance may also be
obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1–
800–835–4709 or 240–402–7800. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Valerie A. Butler, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a document entitled ‘‘Recommendations
for Premarket Notification (510(k))
Submissions for Nucleic Acid-Based
Human Leukocyte Antigen Test Kits
Used for Matching of Donors and
Recipients in Transfusion and
Transplantation; Guidance for
Industry.’’ The guidance provides
recommendations to submitters and
FDA reviewers in preparing and
reviewing 510(k) submissions for IVD
device test kits, specifically for nucleic
acid-based HLA test kits used for the
matching of donors and recipients in
transfusion and transplantation,
whether testing is for a single locus or
for multiple loci simultaneously. The
guidance includes detailed information
on the types of studies FDA
recommends for validation of HLA test
kits submitted as 510(k)s. More
specifically, the guidance document
addresses the types of studies and other
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information that FDA recommends to be
used in designing and conducting
studies for validation of nucleic acidbased HLA test kits and preparing a
510(k) submission.
In the Federal Register of November
20, 2013 (78 FR 69693), FDA announced
the availability of the draft guidance of
the same title dated November 2013.
FDA received several comments on the
draft guidance and those comments
were considered as the guidance was
finalized. In addition, editorial changes
were made for purposes of clarity and
accuracy. The guidance announced in
this notice finalizes the draft guidance
dated November 2013.
The guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on premarket
notification (510(k)) submissions for
nucleic acid-based HLA test kits used
for matching of donors and recipients in
transfusion and transplantation. It does
not establish any rights for any person
and is not binding on FDA or the public.
You can use an alternative approach if
it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR part 807, subpart E have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 809 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0485; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 812 have
been approved under OMB control
numbers 0910–0078 and 0910–0582; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 56 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0130; and the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 50 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0586.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46028-46032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18914]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0007]
Prescription Drug User Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the rates
for prescription drug user fees for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the
Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012 (PDUFA V), authorizes FDA
to collect user fees for certain applications for the review of human
drug and biological products, on establishments where the products are
made, and on such products. This notice establishes the fee rates for
FY 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of
Financial Management, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville
Rd., COLE-14202F, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 735 and 736 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379g and 379h,
respectively) establish three different kinds of user fees. Fees are
assessed on the following: (1) Certain types of applications and
supplements for the review of human drug and biological products; (2)
certain establishments where such products are made; and (3) certain
products (section 736(a) of the FD&C Act). When certain conditions are
met, FDA may waive or reduce fees (section 736(d) of the FD&C Act).
For FY 2013 through FY 2017, the base revenue amounts for the total
revenues from all PDUFA fees are established by PDUFA V. The base
revenue amount for FY 2013, which became the base amount for the
remaining 4 FYs of PDUFA V, is $718,669,000, as published in the
Federal Register of August 1, 2012 (77 FR 45639). The FY 2013 base
revenue amount is further adjusted each year after FY 2013 for
inflation and workload. Fees for applications, establishments, and
products are to be established each year by FDA so that revenues from
each category will provide one-third of the total revenue to be
collected each year.
This document provides fee rates for FY 2016 for an application
requiring
[[Page 46029]]
clinical data ($2,374,200), for an application not requiring clinical
data or a supplement requiring clinical data ($1,187,100), for an
establishment ($585,200), and for a product ($114,450). These fees are
effective on October 1, 2015, and will remain in effect through
September 30, 2016. For applications and supplements that are submitted
on or after October 1, 2015, the new fee schedule must be used.
Invoices for establishment and product fees for FY 2016 will be issued
in August 2015 using the new fee schedule.
II. Fee Revenue Amount for FY 2016
The base revenue amount for FY 2016 is $718,669,000 prior to
adjustments for inflation and workload (see section 736(c)(1) and
(c)(2) of the FD&C Act).
A. FY 2016 Statutory Fee Revenue Adjustments for Inflation
PDUFA V specifies that the $718,669,000 is to be further adjusted
for inflation increases for FY 2016 using two separate adjustments--one
for personnel compensation and benefits (PC&B) and one for non-PC&B
costs (see section 736(c)(1) of the FD&C Act).
The component of the inflation adjustment for payroll costs shall
be 1 plus the average annual percent change in the cost of all PC&B
paid per full-time equivalent (FTE) position at FDA for the first 3 of
the preceding 4 FYs, multiplied by the proportion of PC&B costs to
total FDA costs of process for the review of human drug applications
for the first 3 of the preceding 4 FYs (see section 736(c)(1)(A) and
(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Table 1 summarizes that actual cost and FTE data for the specified
FYs, and provides the percent changes from the previous FYs and the
average percent changes over the first 3 of the 4 FYs preceding FY
2016. The 3-year average is 2.2328 percent.
Table 1--FDA Personnel Compensation and Benefits (PC&B) Each Year and Percent Changes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2012 2013 2014 3-Year average
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total PC&B.......................... $1,824,703,000 $1,927,703,000 $2,054,937,000 .................
Total FTE........................... 13,382 13,974 14,555 .................
PC&B per FTE........................ $136,355 $137,949 $141,184 .................
Percent Change From Previous Year... 3.1843% 1.1690% 2.3451% 2.2328%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The statute specifies that this 2.2328 percent should be multiplied
by the proportion of PC&B costs to total FDA costs of the process for
the review of human drug applications. Table 2 shows the PC&B and the
total obligations for the process for the review of human drug
applications for 3 FYs.
Table 2--PC&B as a Percent of Fee Revenues Spent on the Process for the Review of Human Drug Applications
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2012 2013 2014 3-Year average
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total PC&B.......................................... $592,642,252 $568,206,210 $585,260,720 .......................
Total Costs......................................... $1,032,419,218 $966,169,007 $1,077,263,695 .......................
PC&B Percent........................................ 57.4033% 58.8102% 54.3285% 56.8473%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The payroll adjustment is 2.2328 percent from table 1 multiplied by
56.8473 percent (or 1.2693 percent).
The statute specifies that the portion of the inflation adjustment
for non-payroll costs is the average annual percent change that
occurred in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for urban consumers
(Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV; not seasonally adjusted; all items;
annual index) for the first 3 years of the preceding 4 years of
available data multiplied by the proportion of all costs other than
PC&B costs to total costs of the process for the review of human drug
applications for the first 3 years of the preceding 4 FYs (see section
736(c)(1)(C) of the FD&C Act). Table 3 provides the summary data for
the percent changes in the specified CPI for the Washington-Baltimore
area. The data are published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and can
be found on their Web site at https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu
by checking the box marked ``Washington-Baltimore All Items, November
1996=100--CUURA311SA0'' and then clicking on the ``Retrieve Data''
button.
Table 3--Annual and 3-Year Average Percent Change in CPI for Washington-Baltimore Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 2012 2013 2014 3-Year average
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual CPI.......................................... 150.212 152.500 154.847 .......................
Annual Percent Change............................... 2.2024% 1.5232% 1.5390% 1.7549%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To calculate the inflation adjustment for non-payroll costs, we
multiply the 1.7549 percent by the proportion of all costs other than
PC&B to total costs of the process for the review of human drug
applications obligated. Since 56.8473 percent was obligated for PC&B as
shown in table 2, 43.1527 percent is the portion of costs other than
PC&B (100 percent minus 56.8473 percent equals 43.1527 percent). The
non-payroll adjustment is 1.7549 percent times 43.1527 percent, or
0.7573 percent.
Next, we add the payroll adjustment (1.2693 percent) to the non-
payroll adjustment (0.7573 percent), for a total inflation adjustment
of 2.0266 percent (rounded) for FY 2016.
PDUFA V provides for this inflation adjustment to be compounded
after FY 2013 (see section 736(c)(1) of the FD&C Act). This factor for
FY 2016 (2.0266 percent) is compounded by adding 1
[[Page 46030]]
and then multiplying by 1 plus the compound inflation adjustment factor
for FY 2015 (4.327 percent), as published in the Federal Register of
August 1, 2014 (79 FR 44807 at 44809), which equals to 1.064414
(rounded) (1.020266 times 1.04327) for FY 2016. We then multiply the
base revenue amount for FY 2016 ($718,669,000) by 1.064414, yielding an
inflation-adjusted amount of $764,961,345.
B. FY 2016 Statutory Fee Revenue Adjustments for Workload
The statute specifies that after the $718,669,000 has been adjusted
for inflation, the inflation-adjusted amount shall be further adjusted
for workload (see section 736(c)(2) of the FD&C Act).
To calculate the FY 2016 workload adjustment, FDA calculated the
average number of each of the four types of applications specified in
the workload adjustment provision: (1) Human drug applications; (2)
active commercial investigational new drug applications (INDs)
(applications that have at least one submission during the previous 12
months); (3) efficacy supplements; and (4) manufacturing supplements
received over the 3-year period that ended on June 30, 2012 (base
years), and the average number of each of these types of applications
over the most recent 3 year period that ended June 30, 2015.
The calculations are summarized in table 4. The 3-year averages for
each application category are provided in column 1 (``3-Year Average
Base Years 2010-2012'') and column 2 (``3-Year Average 2013-2015'').
Column 3 reflects the percent change in workload from column 1 to
column 2. Column 4 shows the weighting factor for each type of
application, estimating how much of the total FDA drug review workload
was accounted for by each type of application in the table during the
most recent 3 years. Column 5 is the weighted percent change in each
category of workload. This was derived by multiplying the weighting
factor in each line in column 4 by the percent change from the base
years in column 3. The sum of the values in column 5 is added,
reflecting an increase in workload of 11.31 percent (rounded) for FY
2016 when compared to the base years.
Table 4--Workload Adjuster Calculation for FY 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application type 3-Year 3-Year Percent change Weighting
average base average 2013- (column 1 to factor Weighted
years 2010- 2015 column 2) (percent) percent change
---------------------------------------2012---------------------------------------------------------------------
New Drug Applications/Biologics 124.3 148.3 19.3081 38.9 7.51
License Applications...........
Active Commercial INDs.......... 6830.0 7375.3 7.9839 39.2 3.13
Efficacy Supplements............ 136.3 175.0 28.3933 6.0 1.69
Manufacturing Supplements....... 2548.3 2386.7 -6.3415 16.0 -1.01
FY 2016 Workload Adjuster....... .............. .............. .............. .............. 11.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5 shows the calculation of the revenue amount for FY 2016.
The $718,669,000 subject to adjustment on Line 1 is multiplied by the
inflation adjustment factor of 1.064414, resulting in the inflation-
adjusted amount on Line 3, $764,961,345. That amount is then multiplied
by one plus the workload adjustment of 11.31 percent, resulting in the
inflation and workload adjusted amount of $851,481,000 on Line 5,
rounded to the nearest thousand dollars.
Table 5--PDUFA Revenue Amount for FY 2016, Summary Calculation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2013 Revenue Amount and Base $718,669,000 Line 1.
Subsequent FYs as published in
the Federal Register of August 1,
2012 (77 FR 45639) (Rounded to
nearest thousand dollars).
Inflation Adjustment Factor for FY 1.064414 Line 2.
2016 (1 plus 6.4414 percent).
Inflation Adjusted Amount......... $764,961,345 Line 3.
Workload Adjustment Factor for FY 1.1131 Line 4.
2016 (1 plus 11.31 percent).
Inflation and Workload Adjusted $851,481,000 Line 5.
Amount (Rounded to nearest
thousand dollars).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PDUFA specifies that one-third of the total fee revenue is to be
derived from application fees, one-third from establishment fees, and
one-third from product fees (see section 736(b)(2) of the FD&C Act).
Accordingly, one-third of the total revenue amount ($851,481,000), or a
total of $283,827,000, is the amount of fee revenue that will be
derived from each of these fee categories: Application Fees,
Establishment Fees, and Product Fees.
III. Application Fee Calculations
A. Application Fee Revenues and Application Fees
Application fees will be set to generate one-third of the total fee
revenue amount, or $283,827,000 in FY 2016.
B. Estimate of the Number of Fee-Paying Applications and Setting the
Application Fees
For FY 2013 through FY 2017, FDA will estimate the total number of
fee-paying full application equivalents (FAEs) it expects to receive
the next FY by averaging the number of fee-paying FAEs received in the
3 most recently completed FYs. Beginning with FY 2016, prior year FAE
totals will be updated annually to reflect refunds and waivers
processed after the close of the FY.
In estimating the number of fee-paying FAEs, a full application
requiring clinical data counts as one FAE. An application not requiring
clinical data counts as one-half of an FAE, as does a supplement
requiring clinical data. An application that is withdrawn, or refused
for filing, counts as one-fourth of an FAE if the applicant initially
paid a full application fee, or one-eighth of an FAE if the applicant
initially paid one-half of the full application fee amount.
As table 6 shows, the average number of fee-paying FAEs received
annually in the most recent 3-year period is 119.545 FAEs. FDA will set
fees for FY 2016 based on this estimate as the number of
[[Page 46031]]
full application equivalents that will pay fees.
Table 6--Fee-Paying FAE 3-Year Average
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2012 2013 2014 3-Year average
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee-Paying FAEs................................. 120.375 109.510 128.750 119.545
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning with FY 2016, prior year FAE totals will be updated annually to reflect refunds and waivers processed
after the close of the FY.
The FY 2016 application fee is estimated by dividing the average
number of full applications that paid fees over the latest 3 years,
119.545, into the fee revenue amount to be derived from application
fees in FY 2016, $283,827,000. The result, rounded to the nearest
hundred dollars, is a fee of $2,374,200 per full application requiring
clinical data, and $1,187,100 per application not requiring clinical
data or per supplement requiring clinical data.
IV. Fee Calculations for Establishment and Product Fees
A. Establishment Fees
At the beginning of FY 2015, the establishment fee was based on an
estimate that 509 establishments would be subject to and would pay
fees. By the end of FY 2015, FDA estimates that 516 establishments will
have been billed for establishment fees, before all decisions on
requests for waivers or reductions are made. FDA estimates that a total
of 15 establishment fee waivers or reductions will be made for FY 2015.
In addition, FDA estimates that another 16 full establishment fees will
be exempted this year based on the orphan drug exemption in section
736(k) of the FD&C Act. Subtracting 31 establishments (15 waivers, plus
the estimated 16 establishments under the orphan exemption) from 516
leaves a net of 485 fee-paying establishments. FDA will use 485 to
estimate the FY 2016 establishments paying fees. The fee per
establishment is determined by dividing the adjusted total fee revenue
to be derived from establishments ($283,827,000) by the estimated 485
establishments, for an establishment fee rate for FY 2016 of $585,200
(rounded to the nearest hundred dollars).
B. Product Fees
At the beginning of FY 2015, the product fee was based on an
estimate that 2,434 products would be subject to and would pay product
fees. By the end of FY 2015, FDA estimates that 2,554 products will
have been billed for product fees, before all decisions on requests for
waivers, reductions, or exemptions are made. FDA assumes that there
will be 39 waivers and reductions granted. In addition, FDA estimates
that another 35 product fees will be exempted this year based on the
orphan drug exemption in section 736(k) of the FD&C Act. FDA estimates
that 2,480 products will qualify for and pay product fees in FY 2015,
after allowing for an estimated 74 waivers and reductions, including
the orphan drug products, and will use this number for its FY 2016
estimate. The FY 2016 product fee rate is determined by dividing the
adjusted total fee revenue to be derived from product fees
($283,827,000) by the estimated 2,480 products for a FY 2016 product
fee of $114,450 (rounded to the nearest ten dollars).
V. Fee Schedule for FY 2016
The fee rates for FY 2016 are displayed in table 7:
Table 7--Fee Schedule for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee rates for
Fee category FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applications:
Requiring clinical data............................. $2,374,200
Not requiring clinical data......................... 1,187,100
Supplements requiring clinical data................. 1,187,100
Establishments.......................................... 585,200
Products................................................ 114,450
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Fee Payment Options and Procedures
A. Application Fees
The appropriate application fee established in the new fee schedule
must be paid for any application or supplement subject to fees under
PDUFA that is received on or after October 1, 2015. Payment must be
made in U.S. currency by check, bank draft, or U.S. postal money order
payable to the order of the Food and Drug Administration. Please
include the user fee identification (ID) number on your check, bank
draft, or postal money order. Your payment can be mailed to: Food and
Drug Administration, P.O. Box 979107, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.
If checks are to be sent by a courier that requests a street
address, the courier can deliver the checks to: U.S. Bank, Attention:
Government Lockbox 979107, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.
(Note: This U.S. Bank address is for courier delivery only. Contact the
U.S. Bank at 314-418-4013 if you have any questions concerning courier
delivery.)
Please make sure that the FDA post office box number (P.O. Box
979107) is written on the check, bank draft, or postal money order.
Wire transfer payment may also be used. Please reference your
unique user fee ID number when completing your transfer. The
originating financial institution may charge a wire transfer fee.
Please ask your financial institution about the fee and add it to your
payment to ensure that your fee is fully paid. The account information
for wire transfers is as follows: New York Federal Reserve Bank, U.S.
Department of the Treasury, TREAS NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY
10045, Acct. No.: 75060099, Routing No.: 021030004, SWIFT: FRNYUS33,
Beneficiary: FDA, 8455 Colesville Rd., 14th Floor, Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002.
[[Page 46032]]
Application fees can also be paid online with an electronic check
(ACH). FDA has partnered with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to
use Pay.gov, a Web-based payment application, for online electronic
payment. The Pay.gov feature is available on the FDA Web site after the
user fee ID number is generated.
The tax identification number of FDA is 53-0196965.
B. Establishment and Product Fees
FDA will issue invoices for establishment and product fees for FY
2016 under the new fee schedule in August 2015. Payment will be due on
October 1, 2015. FDA will issue invoices in November 2016 for any
products and establishments subject to fees for FY 2016 that qualify
for fee assessments after the August 2015 billing.
Dated: July 28, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-18914 Filed 7-31-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P