Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC; Rio Grande LNG, LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned Rio Grande LNG Project and Rio Bravo Pipeline Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting, 45517-45520 [2015-18684]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Notices
Exports of
electricity from the United States to a
foreign country are regulated by the
Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to
sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the
Department of Energy Organization Act
(42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require
authorization under section 202(e) of
the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.
824a(e)).
On July 13, 2015, DOE received an
application from Roctop for authority to
transmit electric energy from the United
States to Canada as a power marketer for
five years using existing international
transmission facilities.
In its application, Roctop states that it
does not own or control any electric
generation or transmission facilities,
and it does not have a franchised service
area. Roctop states that it has applied for
market-based rate authority from the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) to engage in the sale and
purchase of electric energy to and from
Independent System Operators and
Regional Transmission Organizations.
As such, the electric energy that Roctop
proposes to export to Canada would be
surplus energy purchased from third
parties such as power marketers,
independent power producers, electric
utilities, and Federal power marketing
agencies pursuant to voluntary
agreements. The existing international
transmission facilities to be utilized by
Roctop have previously been authorized
by Presidential permits issued pursuant
to Executive Order 10485, as amended,
and are appropriate for open access
transmission by third parties.
Procedural Matters: Any person
desiring to be heard in this proceeding
should file a comment or protest to the
application at the address provided
above. Protests should be filed in
accordance with Rule 211 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC)
Rules of Practice and Procedures (18
CFR 385.211). Any person desiring to
become a party to these proceedings
should file a motion to intervene at the
above address in accordance with FERC
Rule 214 (18 CFR 385.214). Five copies
of such comments, protests, or motions
to intervene should be sent to the
address provided above on or before the
date listed above.
Comments and other filings
concerning the Roctop application to
export electric energy to Canada should
be clearly marked with OE Docket No.
EA–414. An additional copy is to be
provided directly to Ruta Kalvaitis
Skucas, Pierce Atwood LLC, 900 17th
St. NW., Suite 350, Washington, DC
20006 and to Vincent Thellen, 1061
Merivale Road—Unit 5, Ottawa (ON),
Canada K1Z 6A9.
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
A final decision will be made on this
application after the environmental
impacts have been evaluated pursuant
to DOE’s National Environmental Policy
Act Implementing Procedures (10 CFR
part 1021, et seq.) and after a
determination is made by DOE that the
proposed action will not have an
adverse impact on the sufficiency of
supply or reliability of the U.S. electric
power supply system.
Copies of this application will be
made available, upon request, for public
inspection and copying at the address
provided above, by accessing the
program Web site at https://energy.gov/
node/11845, or by emailing Angela Troy
at Angela.Troy@hq.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 24,
2015.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2015–18688 Filed 7–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF15–20–000]
Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC; Rio
Grande LNG, LLC; Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement for the Planned Rio Grande
LNG Project and Rio Bravo Pipeline
Project, Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Public Scoping Meeting
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
that will discuss the environmental
impacts of the Rio Grande LNG Project
and Rio Bravo Pipeline Project (Rio
Grande LNG Project) involving
construction and operation of natural
gas pipeline and liquefaction facilities
by Rio Grande LNG, LLC, and Rio Bravo
Pipeline Company, LLC, collectively the
Rio Grande Developers (RG Developers),
in Kleberg, Kenedy, Willacy, and
Cameron Counties, Texas. The
Commission will use this EIS in its
decision-making process to determine
whether the project is in the public
interest.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the project.
You can make a difference by providing
us with your specific comments or
concerns about the project. Your
comments should focus on the potential
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45517
environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or
lessen environmental impacts. Your
input will help the Commission staff
determine what issues they need to
evaluate in the EIS. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send your comments so
that the Commission receives them in
Washington, DC on or before August 24,
2015.
If you sent comments on this project
to the Commission before the opening of
this docket on March 20, 2015, you will
need to file those comments in Docket
No. PF15–20–000 to ensure they are
considered as part of this proceeding.
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and
local government representatives should
notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
planned facilities. The company would
seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the project, that approval
conveys with it the right of eminent
domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings
where compensation would be
determined in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This
fact sheet addresses a number of
typically asked questions, including the
use of eminent domain and how to
participate in the Commission’s
proceedings.
Public Participation
For your convenience, there are four
methods you can use to submit your
comments to the Commission. The
Commission will provide equal
consideration to all comments received,
whether filed in written form or
provided verbally. The Commission
encourages electronic filing of
comments and has expert staff available
to assist you at (202) 502–8258 or
efiling@ferc.gov. Please carefully follow
these instructions so that your
comments are properly recorded.
(1) You can file your comments
electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission’s Web site
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
45518
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Notices
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy
method for submitting brief, text-only
comments on a project;
(2) You can file your comments
electronically by using the eFiling
feature on the Commission’s Web site
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling,
you can provide comments in a variety
of formats by attaching them as a file
with your submission. New eFiling
users must first create an account by
clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ If you are filing
a comment on a particular project,
please select ‘‘Comment on a Filing’’ as
the filing type; or
(3) You can file a paper copy of your
comments by mailing them to the
following address. Be sure to reference
the project docket number (PF15–20–
000) with your submission: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
(4) In lieu of sending written or
electronic comments, the Commission
invites you to attend one of the public
scoping meetings its staff will conduct
in the project area, scheduled as
follows.
FERC PUBLIC SCOPING MEETINGS RIO GRANDE LNG PROJECT
Date and time
Location
Monday, August 10, 2015, 3:00–8:00 p.m ...............................................
Raymondville High School Auditorium, 419 FM 3168, Raymondville, TX
78580, (956) 689–8170.
Port Isabel Event and Cultural Center, 309 E. Railroad St., Port Isabel,
TX 78578, (956) 943–0719.
Helen Kleberg Community Center, 230 W. Yoakum Ave, Kingsville, TX
78363, (361) 592–8021.
Tuesday, August 11, 2015, 12:00–8:00 p.m ............................................
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Thursday, August 13, 2015, 3:00–8:00 p.m .............................................
You may attend at any time during
the meetings, as the primary goal of a
scoping meeting is for us to have your
verbal environmental concerns
documented. There will not be a formal
presentation by Commission staff, but
FERC staff will be available to answer
your questions about the FERC
environmental review process.
Representatives of the RG Developers
will also be present to answer questions
about the project.
For your convenience, FERC staff will
hold a joint scoping meeting on
Tuesday, August 11, for the Rio Grande
LNG Project, the Texas LNG
Brownsville LNG Project (PF15–14), and
Annova LNG Brownsville Project
(PF15–15). This joint scoping meeting
will give you the opportunity to provide
your verbal comments on one or all
three of the planned liquefied natural
gas (LNG) export projects along the
Brownsville Ship Channel currently in
our pre-filing process. In addition to the
RG Developers, representatives from the
Texas LNG Brownsville LNG Project
and Annova LNG Brownsville Project
will be present at the joint scoping
meeting on Tuesday to answer questions
about their respective projects.
Verbal comments will be recorded by
a stenographer and transcripts will be
placed into the appropriate docket(s) for
the project, and made available for
public viewing on FERC’s eLibrary
system (see page 8 ‘‘Additional
Information’’ for instruction on using
eLibrary). It is important to note that
verbal comments hold the same weight
as written or electronically submitted
comments. If a significant number of
people are interested in providing
verbal comments, a time limit of 3 to 5
minutes may be implemented for each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
commenter to ensure all those wishing
to comment have the opportunity to do
so within the designated meeting time.
Time limits will be strictly enforced if
they are implemented.
Please note this is not your only
public input opportunity; please refer to
the review process flow chart in
appendix 1.1
Summary of the Planned Project
The RG Developers plan to construct
and operate interrelated LNG terminal
and natural gas infrastructure projects.
The Rio Grande LNG Terminal
(Terminal) would involve an LNG
export terminal and marine facilities to
accommodate LNG vessels along the
Brownsville Ship Channel in Cameron
County, Texas. The Rio Bravo Pipeline
Project would include two new natural
gas pipelines capable of transporting 4.5
billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) of
natural gas from Kleberg County, Texas,
to the planned Terminal. The Rio
Grande LNG Project would be
constructed in two phases and, when
complete, would export the LNG
equivalent of about 3.8 bcf/d of natural
gas. According to the RG Developers,
their project would provide an
additional source of firm, long-term, and
competitively priced liquefied natural
gas.
The Rio Grande LNG Project would
consist of the following facilities:
1 The appendices referenced in this notice will
not appear in the Federal Register. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ‘‘eLibrary’’ or from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call (202)
502–8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• An export liquefaction terminal that
includes:
Æ Six liquefaction trains and natural
gas treatment facilities;
Æ a marine facility, including two
LNG berths and a turning basin;
Æ a 600-megawatt electrical power
generation station;
Æ truck loading/unloading facilities
for LNG, natural gas liquid condensate,
and refrigerant;
Æ a marine construction dock; and
Æ four full-containment LNG storage
tanks;
• two parallel 140-mile-long, 42-inchdiameter pipelines extending northerly
from the Terminal to Kleberg County,
Texas;
• three compressor stations;
• two meter stations;
• multiple pipeline interconnects
with third-party pipelines;
• mainline valves;
• pig launcher and receiver
facilities; 2 and
• other pipeline-related facilities (e.g.,
access roads, contractor and pipe yards).
The general location of the project
facilities is shown in appendix 2.
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction and operation of the
planned Terminal would disturb about
750 acres of land within a 1,000-acre
parcel to accommodate the liquefaction
facilities, marine berth, and turning
basin. The RG Developers are assessing
the total land requirements for
construction of the planned pipelines
but currently plan to maintain a
permanent easement of up to 120 feet
2 A ‘‘pig’’ is a tool that the pipeline company
inserts into and pushes through the pipeline for
cleaning the pipeline, conducting internal
inspections, or other purposes.
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Notices
centered on the pipelines; the remaining
acreage would be restored and would
revert to former uses. About 64 percent
of the planned pipeline routes parallel
existing pipeline, utility, or road rightsof-way.
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The EIS Process
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to
take into account the environmental
impacts that could result from an action
whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity. NEPA also requires us 3 to
discover and address concerns the
public may have about proposals. This
process is referred to as scoping. The
main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EIS on the
important environmental issues. By this
notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to
address in the EIS. We will consider all
filed comments during the preparation
of the EIS.
In the EIS we will discuss impacts
that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the
planned project under these general
headings:
• Geology and soils;
• land use;
• water resources, fisheries, and
wetlands;
• cultural resources;
• vegetation and wildlife;
• air quality and noise;
• endangered and threatened species;
• socioeconomics;
• public safety; and
• cumulative impacts.
We will also evaluate possible
alternatives to the planned project or
portions of the project, and make
recommendations on how to lessen or
avoid impacts on the various resource
areas.
Although no formal application has
been filed, we have already initiated our
NEPA review under the Commission’s
pre-filing process. The purpose of the
pre-filing process is to encourage early
involvement of interested stakeholders
and to identify and resolve issues before
the FERC receives an application. As
part of our pre-filing review, we have
begun to contact some federal and state
agencies to discuss their involvement in
the scoping process and the preparation
of the EIS.
The EIS will present our independent
analysis of the issues. We will publish
and distribute the draft EIS for public
comment. After the comment period, we
3 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the
environmental staff of the Commission’s Office of
Energy Projects.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
will consider all timely comments and
revise the document, as necessary,
before issuing a final EIS. To ensure we
have the opportunity to consider and
address your comments, please carefully
follow the instructions in the Public
Participation section, beginning on
page 2.
With this notice, we are asking
agencies with jurisdiction by law and/
or special expertise with respect to the
environmental issues related to this
project to formally cooperate with us in
the preparation of the EIS.4 Agencies
that would like to request cooperating
agency status should follow the
instructions for filing comments
provided under the Public Participation
section of this notice.
Consultations Under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act
In accordance with the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation’s
implementing regulations for section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we are using this
notice to initiate consultation with the
Texas State Historic Preservation Office,
and to solicit their views and those of
other government agencies, interested
Indian tribes, and the public on the
project’s potential effects on historic
properties.5 We will define the projectspecific Area of Potential Effects (APE)
in consultation with the SHPO as the
project develops. On natural gas facility
projects, the APE at a minimum
encompasses all areas subject to ground
disturbance (examples include
construction right-of-way, contractor/
pipe storage yards, compressor stations,
and access roads). Our EIS for this
project will document our findings on
the impacts on historic properties and
summarize the status of consultations
under section 106.
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
We have already identified several
issues that we think deserve attention
based on a preliminary review of the
planned facilities, comments received
by the public to date, and the
environmental information provided by
RG Developers. This preliminary list of
issues may change based on your
comments and our analysis.
4 The Council on Environmental Quality
regulations addressing cooperating agency
responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
5 The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
regulations are at Title 36, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 800. Those regulations define
historic properties as any prehistoric or historic
district, site, building, structure, or object included
in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register
of Historic Places.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45519
• Public health and safety;
• air quality;
• special status species, including the
ocelot and aplomado falcon;
• biological diversity and wildlife
preserves, including the Laguna
Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, and
the Lower Rio Grande Valley National
Wildlife Refuge;
• impacts on vegetation and habitat,
including wetlands;
• economic impacts on fishing and
tourism industries;
• environmental justice;
• visual impacts of the Terminal; and
• cumulative effects, including the
effects of multiple planned LNG projects
along the Brownsville Ship Channel.
Environmental Mailing List
The environmental mailing list
includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and
agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest
groups; Native American tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries
and newspapers. This list also includes
all affected landowners (as defined in
the Commission’s regulations) who are
potential right-of-way grantors, whose
property may be used temporarily for
project purposes, or who own homes
within certain distances of aboveground
facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. We will
update the environmental mailing list as
the analysis proceeds to ensure that we
send the information related to this
environmental review to all individuals,
organizations, and government entities
interested in and/or potentially affected
by the planned project.
Copies of the completed draft EIS will
be sent to the environmental mailing list
for public review and comment. If you
would prefer to receive a paper copy of
the document instead of the CD version
or would like to remove your name from
the mailing list, please return the
attached Information Request
(appendix 3).
Becoming an Intervenor
Once the RG Developers file their
application with the Commission, you
may want to become an ‘‘intervenor’’
which is an official party to the
Commission’s proceeding. Intervenors
play a more formal role in the process
and are able to file briefs, appear at
hearings, and be heard by the courts if
they choose to appeal the Commission’s
final ruling. An intervenor formally
participates in the proceeding by filing
a request to intervene. Instructions for
becoming an intervenor are in the User’s
Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’ link on the
Commission’s Web site. Please note that
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
45520
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Notices
the Commission will not accept requests
for intervenor status at this time. You
must wait until the Commission
receives a formal application for the
project.
Additional Information
Additional information about the
project is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs,
at (866) 208–FERC, or on the FERC Web
site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary
link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on
‘‘General Search’’ and enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits
in the Docket Number field (i.e., PF15–
20). Be sure you have selected an
appropriate date range. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support at
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free
at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, contact
(202) 502–8659. The eLibrary link also
provides access to the texts of formal
documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and
rulemakings.
In addition, the Commission offers a
free service called eSubscription which
allows you to keep track of all formal
issuances and submittals in specific
dockets. This can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings
by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document
summaries, and direct links to the
documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/esubscription.asp.
Finally, public meetings or site visits
will be posted on the Commission’s
calendar located at www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
Dated: July 23, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–18684 Filed 7–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. PF15–14–000]
Texas LNG Brownsville, LLC; Notice of
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Planned
Texas LNG Project, Request for
Comments on Environmental Issues,
and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
examining the potential environmental
effects of the Texas LNG Project
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
(Project), planned by Texas LNG
Brownsville LLC (Texas LNG). The
Project involves the construction and
operation of a liquefied natural gas
(LNG) liquefaction and export terminal
on the Brownsville Ship Channel
located in Cameron County, Texas. The
Project purpose is to liquefy
domestically produced natural gas, store
LNG, and deliver LNG to carriers for
export overseas. The Commission will
use the EIS in its decision-making
process to determine whether to
authorize the Project.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies about the
Project. You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Project.
Your comments should focus on the
potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to
avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
Your input will help the Commission’s
staff determine what issues need to be
evaluated in the EIS. To ensure that
your comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send your comments so
that the Commission receives them in
Washington, DC on or before August 24,
2015.
If you sent comments on this Project
to the Commission before the opening of
this docket on March 9, 2015, you will
need to file those comments in Docket
No. PF15–14–000 to ensure they are
considered as part of this proceeding.
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for this Project. State and
local government representatives should
notify their constituents of this planned
Project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern. If you are a
landowner receiving this notice, a Texas
LNG representative may contact you
about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
planned facilities.
Public Participation
For your convenience, there are four
methods you can use to submit your
comments to the Commission. The
Commission will provide equal
consideration to all comments received,
whether filed in written form or
provided verbally. The Commission
encourages electronic filing of
comments and has expert staff available
to assist you at (202) 502–8258 or
efiling@ferc.gov. Please carefully follow
these instructions so that your
comments are properly recorded.
(1) You can file your comments
electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission’s Web site
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy
method for submitting brief, text-only
comments on a project;
(2) You can file your comments
electronically by using the eFiling
feature on the Commission’s Web site
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling,
you can provide comments in a variety
of formats by attaching them as a file
with your submission. New eFiling
users must first create an account by
clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ If you are filing
a comment on a particular project,
please select ‘‘Comment on a Filing’’ as
the filing type; or
(3) You can file a paper copy of your
comments by mailing them to the
following address. Be sure to reference
the project docket number (PF15–14–
000) with your submission: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
(4) In lieu of sending written or
electronic comments, the Commission
invites you to attend the public scoping
meeting its staff will conduct in the
Project area, scheduled as follows.
FERC Public Scoping Meeting; Tuesday,
August 11, 2015, From 1:00 p.m. to 8:00
p.m.; Port Isabel Event & Cultural
Center, 309 E. Railroad Ave., Port
Isabel, TX 78578
You may attend at any time during
the scoping meeting. There will not be
a formal presentation presented by
Commission staff, but you will be
provided information about the FERC
process. Commission staff will be
available to take verbal comments.
For your convenience, we are
combining the Port Isabel scoping
meetings for the three Brownsville area
LNG projects currently in our pre-filing
process. Representatives of Texas LNG,
as well as those of Annova LNG
Common Infrastructure, LLC for its
planned Annova LNG Brownsville
Project (Docket No. PF15–15–000) and
Rio Grande LNG, LLC for its planned
Rio Grande LNG Export Project and Rio
Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC for its
planned Rio Bravo Pipeline Project
(Docket No. PF15–20–000) will be
present to answer questions about their
respective planned projects.
You may comment on any one, two,
or all three planned projects. Comments
will be recorded by a stenographer and
transcripts will be placed into the
appropriate docket(s) for the project and
made available for public viewing on
FERC’s eLibrary system (see page 8
‘‘Additional Information’’ for
instructions on using eLibrary). We
believe it is important to note that
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45517-45520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. PF15-20-000]
Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC; Rio Grande LNG, LLC; Notice of
Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned Rio
Grande LNG Project and Rio Bravo Pipeline Project, Request for Comments
on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that
will discuss the environmental impacts of the Rio Grande LNG Project
and Rio Bravo Pipeline Project (Rio Grande LNG Project) involving
construction and operation of natural gas pipeline and liquefaction
facilities by Rio Grande LNG, LLC, and Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC,
collectively the Rio Grande Developers (RG Developers), in Kleberg,
Kenedy, Willacy, and Cameron Counties, Texas. The Commission will use
this EIS in its decision-making process to determine whether the
project is in the public interest.
This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies on the project. You can make a difference by providing us with
your specific comments or concerns about the project. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
Your input will help the Commission staff determine what issues they
need to evaluate in the EIS. To ensure that your comments are timely
and properly recorded, please send your comments so that the Commission
receives them in Washington, DC on or before August 24, 2015.
If you sent comments on this project to the Commission before the
opening of this docket on March 20, 2015, you will need to file those
comments in Docket No. PF15-20-000 to ensure they are considered as
part of this proceeding.
This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the planned facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the Commission approves the project, that approval conveys with it the
right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to
produce an agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation
proceedings where compensation would be determined in accordance with
state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent
domain and how to participate in the Commission's proceedings.
Public Participation
For your convenience, there are four methods you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. The Commission will provide equal
consideration to all comments received, whether filed in written form
or provided verbally. The Commission encourages electronic filing of
comments and has expert staff available to assist you at (202) 502-8258
or efiling@ferc.gov. Please carefully follow these instructions so that
your comments are properly recorded.
(1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site
[[Page 45518]]
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to Documents and Filings. This is an easy
method for submitting brief, text-only comments on a project;
(2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' If you are filing a comment on a particular project,
please select ``Comment on a Filing'' as the filing type; or
(3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address. Be sure to reference the project docket number
(PF15-20-000) with your submission: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426.
(4) In lieu of sending written or electronic comments, the
Commission invites you to attend one of the public scoping meetings its
staff will conduct in the project area, scheduled as follows.
FERC Public Scoping Meetings Rio Grande LNG Project
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date and time Location
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, August 10, 2015, 3:00-8:00 p.m. Raymondville High School
Auditorium, 419 FM 3168,
Raymondville, TX 78580, (956)
689-8170.
Tuesday, August 11, 2015, 12:00-8:00 Port Isabel Event and Cultural
p.m. Center, 309 E. Railroad St.,
Port Isabel, TX 78578, (956)
943-0719.
Thursday, August 13, 2015, 3:00-8:00 Helen Kleberg Community Center,
p.m. 230 W. Yoakum Ave, Kingsville,
TX 78363, (361) 592-8021.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You may attend at any time during the meetings, as the primary goal
of a scoping meeting is for us to have your verbal environmental
concerns documented. There will not be a formal presentation by
Commission staff, but FERC staff will be available to answer your
questions about the FERC environmental review process. Representatives
of the RG Developers will also be present to answer questions about the
project.
For your convenience, FERC staff will hold a joint scoping meeting
on Tuesday, August 11, for the Rio Grande LNG Project, the Texas LNG
Brownsville LNG Project (PF15-14), and Annova LNG Brownsville Project
(PF15-15). This joint scoping meeting will give you the opportunity to
provide your verbal comments on one or all three of the planned
liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects along the Brownsville Ship
Channel currently in our pre-filing process. In addition to the RG
Developers, representatives from the Texas LNG Brownsville LNG Project
and Annova LNG Brownsville Project will be present at the joint scoping
meeting on Tuesday to answer questions about their respective projects.
Verbal comments will be recorded by a stenographer and transcripts
will be placed into the appropriate docket(s) for the project, and made
available for public viewing on FERC's eLibrary system (see page 8
``Additional Information'' for instruction on using eLibrary). It is
important to note that verbal comments hold the same weight as written
or electronically submitted comments. If a significant number of people
are interested in providing verbal comments, a time limit of 3 to 5
minutes may be implemented for each commenter to ensure all those
wishing to comment have the opportunity to do so within the designated
meeting time. Time limits will be strictly enforced if they are
implemented.
Please note this is not your only public input opportunity; please
refer to the review process flow chart in appendix 1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 502-8371. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of the Planned Project
The RG Developers plan to construct and operate interrelated LNG
terminal and natural gas infrastructure projects. The Rio Grande LNG
Terminal (Terminal) would involve an LNG export terminal and marine
facilities to accommodate LNG vessels along the Brownsville Ship
Channel in Cameron County, Texas. The Rio Bravo Pipeline Project would
include two new natural gas pipelines capable of transporting 4.5
billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) of natural gas from Kleberg County,
Texas, to the planned Terminal. The Rio Grande LNG Project would be
constructed in two phases and, when complete, would export the LNG
equivalent of about 3.8 bcf/d of natural gas. According to the RG
Developers, their project would provide an additional source of firm,
long-term, and competitively priced liquefied natural gas.
The Rio Grande LNG Project would consist of the following
facilities:
An export liquefaction terminal that includes:
[cir] Six liquefaction trains and natural gas treatment facilities;
[cir] a marine facility, including two LNG berths and a turning
basin;
[cir] a 600-megawatt electrical power generation station;
[cir] truck loading/unloading facilities for LNG, natural gas
liquid condensate, and refrigerant;
[cir] a marine construction dock; and
[cir] four full-containment LNG storage tanks;
two parallel 140-mile-long, 42-inch-diameter pipelines
extending northerly from the Terminal to Kleberg County, Texas;
three compressor stations;
two meter stations;
multiple pipeline interconnects with third-party
pipelines;
mainline valves;
pig launcher and receiver facilities; \2\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A ``pig'' is a tool that the pipeline company inserts into
and pushes through the pipeline for cleaning the pipeline,
conducting internal inspections, or other purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
other pipeline-related facilities (e.g., access roads,
contractor and pipe yards).
The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
2.
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction and operation of the planned Terminal would disturb
about 750 acres of land within a 1,000-acre parcel to accommodate the
liquefaction facilities, marine berth, and turning basin. The RG
Developers are assessing the total land requirements for construction
of the planned pipelines but currently plan to maintain a permanent
easement of up to 120 feet
[[Page 45519]]
centered on the pipelines; the remaining acreage would be restored and
would revert to former uses. About 64 percent of the planned pipeline
routes parallel existing pipeline, utility, or road rights-of-way.
The EIS Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\3\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This process is referred to as scoping. The main goal of the
scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EIS on the important
environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EIS. We will
consider all filed comments during the preparation of the EIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the EIS we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the planned project under these
general headings:
Geology and soils;
land use;
water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
cultural resources;
vegetation and wildlife;
air quality and noise;
endangered and threatened species;
socioeconomics;
public safety; and
cumulative impacts.
We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the planned project
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
Although no formal application has been filed, we have already
initiated our NEPA review under the Commission's pre-filing process.
The purpose of the pre-filing process is to encourage early involvement
of interested stakeholders and to identify and resolve issues before
the FERC receives an application. As part of our pre-filing review, we
have begun to contact some federal and state agencies to discuss their
involvement in the scoping process and the preparation of the EIS.
The EIS will present our independent analysis of the issues. We
will publish and distribute the draft EIS for public comment. After the
comment period, we will consider all timely comments and revise the
document, as necessary, before issuing a final EIS. To ensure we have
the opportunity to consider and address your comments, please carefully
follow the instructions in the Public Participation section, beginning
on page 2.
With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction by law
and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues
related to this project to formally cooperate with us in the
preparation of the EIS.\4\ Agencies that would like to request
cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act
In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we are using this notice to initiate consultation
with the Texas State Historic Preservation Office, and to solicit their
views and those of other government agencies, interested Indian tribes,
and the public on the project's potential effects on historic
properties.\5\ We will define the project-specific Area of Potential
Effects (APE) in consultation with the SHPO as the project develops. On
natural gas facility projects, the APE at a minimum encompasses all
areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include construction
right-of-way, contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor stations, and
access roads). Our EIS for this project will document our findings on
the impacts on historic properties and summarize the status of
consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the planned facilities,
comments received by the public to date, and the environmental
information provided by RG Developers. This preliminary list of issues
may change based on your comments and our analysis.
Public health and safety;
air quality;
special status species, including the ocelot and aplomado
falcon;
biological diversity and wildlife preserves, including the
Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, and the Lower Rio Grande
Valley National Wildlife Refuge;
impacts on vegetation and habitat, including wetlands;
economic impacts on fishing and tourism industries;
environmental justice;
visual impacts of the Terminal; and
cumulative effects, including the effects of multiple
planned LNG projects along the Brownsville Ship Channel.
Environmental Mailing List
The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
planned project.
Copies of the completed draft EIS will be sent to the environmental
mailing list for public review and comment. If you would prefer to
receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD version or would
like to remove your name from the mailing list, please return the
attached Information Request (appendix 3).
Becoming an Intervenor
Once the RG Developers file their application with the Commission,
you may want to become an ``intervenor'' which is an official party to
the Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are in
the User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web
site. Please note that
[[Page 45520]]
the Commission will not accept requests for intervenor status at this
time. You must wait until the Commission receives a formal application
for the project.
Additional Information
Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., PF15-
20). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502-8659. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.
Dated: July 23, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-18684 Filed 7-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P