Promise Zones Initiative: Proposed Third Round Selection Process Solicitation of Comment, 45227-45230 [2015-18626]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices
Dated: July 13, 2015.
Kendall Carpenter,
Telecommunications Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2015–18582 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Establishment of the U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement Advisory
Committee on Family Residential
Centers and Solicitation of
Nominations for Membership
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of establishment of
advisory committee and solicitation of
membership nominations.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) announces the
establishment of the U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Advisory Committee on Family
Residential Centers (ACFRC) and invites
the public to nominate individuals for
one-year, two-year, and three-year term
appointments.
DATES: Submit nominations for
committee membership by August 1,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Nominations must be in
writing and be submitted to: John
Amaya, Senior Advisor to the Director,
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Office of the Director, 500
12th Street SW., 11th Floor,
Washington, DC 20536; or by email to
ICE_ACFRC@ice.dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Amaya at the above address or by
telephone 202–732–3000 or email ICE_
ACFRC@ice.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background and Authority
Under the Secretary of DHS’s
authority in Title 6, United States Code
(U.S.C.), section 451, this Committee is
established in accordance with and
operates under the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) (Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix). The
committee will provide advice and
recommendations to the Secretary of
DHS through the Assistant Secretary of
ICE on matters concerning ICE’s family
residential centers on matters relating to
detention management, family and
youth services, health, and education.
II. Structure
The Committee shall be composed of
up to 15 members who are appointed by
and serve at the pleasure of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Secretary of DHS. The membership shall
consist of experts and advocates from
the fields of primary education,
immigration law, physical and mental
health, trauma-informed services, family
and youth services, detention
management, and detention reform, and
other fields as the Secretary determines
to be appropriate. Members will be
appointed to represent their respective
academic institution or organization and
will not be Special Government
Employees (SGEs) as defined in Title 18,
U.S.C., section 202(a).
For the initial appointments to the
Committee, approximately one-third of
the members shall serve 1-year terms of
office, one-third shall serve 2-year terms
of office, and one-third shall serve 3year terms of office. Thereafter,
members will serve terms of office of up
to three years, with approximately onethird of members’ terms of office
expiring each year. A member
appointed to fill an unexpired term
serves the remainder of that term. ICE
and DHS will strive to fill a Committee
vacancy no later than six months after
the position is vacated. In the event the
Committee terminates, all appointments
to the Committee terminate.
The Designated Federal Official (DFO)
may approve the establishment of
subcommittees for any purpose
consistent the Committee’s charter.
Subcommittees shall be composed of
Committee members as determined by
the DFO. Subcommittees may not work
independently of the chartered
Committee and must present their work
to the Committee for full deliberation
and discussion. Subcommittees have no
authority to make decisions on behalf of
the Committee and may not report
directly to the Federal Government or
any other entity.
The Committee is expected to meet
two times each year. Additional
meetings may be held with the approval
of the DFO.
45227
nominee is willing to serve as a member
of the Committee. Potential candidates
will be asked to provide detailed
information concerning financial
interests, consultancies, research grants,
and/or contracts that might be affected
by recommendations of the Committee
to permit evaluation of possible sources
of conflicts of interests.
A nomination package should include
the following information for each
nominee:
(1) A letter of nomination stating the
name, affiliation, and contact
information for the nominee, the basis
for the nomination (i.e., what specific
attributes recommend him/her for
service in this capacity), and the
nominee’s field(s) of expertise.
(2) A biographical sketch of the
nominee and a copy of his/her
curriculum vitae and/or resume.
(3) The name, return mailing address,
email address, and daytime phone
number at which the nominator can be
contacted.
To ensure a diverse nominee pool,
ICE and DHS encourage nominations for
appropriately qualified candidates of
every gender, age, race, ethnicity,
national origin, religion, sexual
orientation, gender identity, disability,
and geographic region.
All nominations should be provided
in a single, complete package. All
nominations should be sent to the
submission address and contact
provided above.
Please note this notice is not intended
to be the exclusive method by which
ICE and DHS will solicit membership
nominations and expressions of interest
to identify qualified candidates.
However, all candidates for membership
on the Committee will be subject to the
same evaluation criteria.
Dated: July 23, 2015.
˜
Sarah R. Saldana,
Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement.
III. Compensation
Members may be reimbursed for
travel and per diem, and all travel for
Committee business must be approved
in advance by the DFO.
[FR Doc. 2015–18581 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
IV. Nominations
ICE and DHS will consider
nominations of all qualified individuals
to ensure that the Committee includes
the areas of subject matter expertise
noted above (see ‘‘Structure’’).
Individuals may nominate themselves
or other individuals, and professional
associations and organizations may
nominate one or more qualified persons
for membership on the Committee.
Nominations must state that the
[Docket No. 5774–N–03]
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 9110–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Promise Zones Initiative: Proposed
Third Round Selection Process
Solicitation of Comment
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Through this notice, HUD
solicits comment, for a period of 60-
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
45228
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices
days, on the proposed selection process,
criteria and submissions for the Third
Round of the Promise Zones Initiative.
DATES: Comments Due Date: September
28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Questions or comments
should be directed by email to
PromiseZones@hud.gov with ‘‘Third
Round Promise Zones selection’’ in the
subject line. Questions or comments
may also be directed by postal mail to
the Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Economic Development,
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street SW.,
Room 7136, Washington, DC 20410
ATTN: 3nd Round Promise Zones
selection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Bryan Herdliska, Office of Community
Planning and Development, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC, 20410; telephone
number 202–402–6758. This is not a
toll-free number. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background—Round 1 and 2 Promise
Zones
In his 2013 State of the Union
address, President Obama announced
the establishment of the Promise Zones
Initiative to partner with high-poverty
communities across the country to
create jobs, increase economic security,
expand educational opportunities,
increase access to quality, affordable
housing, and improve public safety.1 On
January 8, 2014, the President
announced the first five Promise Zones,
which are located in: San Antonio, TX;
Philadelphia, PA; Los Angeles, CA;
Southeastern Kentucky, KY; and the
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, OK. On
April 28, 2015, the Obama
Administration announced eight more
Promise Zones as part of the second
round Promise Zone selection process,
which are located in: Camden, NJ;
Hartford, CT; Indianapolis, IN;
Minneapolis, MN; Sacramento, CA; St.
Louis County, MO; Barnwell, SC; and
Porcupine, SD. Each of these
communities (eight urban, one rural,
and one tribal) submitted a plan on how
it will partner with local business and
community leaders to make investments
1 See https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/
2013/02/15/fact-sheet-president-s-plan-ensurehard-work-leads-decent-living.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
that reward hard work and expand
opportunity. In exchange, the Federal
government is helping these Promise
Zone designees secure the resources and
flexibility they need to achieve their
goals.2
The first five Promise Zones were
selected through a competitive process
following an invitation to eligible
communities to apply for a designation,
which was issued on October 30, 2013
with an application deadline of
November 26, 2013.3 The urban
designations were conferred by HUD
while the rural and tribal designations
were conferred by USDA. The pool of
eligible applicants was limited to
communities with demonstrated
capacity in one or more areas of Promise
Zone work that would prepare them to
broaden their efforts to additional
revitalization priorities. Specifically,
urban eligibility was limited to
communities encompassing a Choice
Neighborhoods or Promise
Neighborhoods Implementation grant,
or a Byrne Criminal Justice Innovation
grant, while rural and tribal eligibility
was limited to communities
encompassing a Stronger Economies
Together, Sustainable Communities,
Promise Neighborhoods
Implementation, or Rural Jobs
Accelerator grant.
The second round Promise Zone
selection process opened on August 29,
2014 with an application deadline of
November 21, 2014.4 This second round
competition designated 8 more
communities meeting the specified
eligibility criteria without regard to their
prior selection for receipt of federal
grants. As with the first round, the
urban designations were conferred by
HUD while the rural and tribal
designations were conferred by USDA.
Promise Zone Benefits
The Promise Zones Initiative seeks to
revitalize high-poverty communities
across the country by creating jobs,
increasing economic activity, improving
educational opportunities, reducing
violent crime, leveraging private capital,
and assisting local leaders in navigating
federal programs. Promise Zones will
not receive grant funding. The Promise
Zone designation partners the Federal
government with local leaders who are
addressing multiple community
revitalization challenges in a
collaborative way and have
2 See https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/
2014/01/08/fact-sheet-president-obama-s-promisezones-initiative.
3 See www.hud.gov/promisezones.
4 See https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/
press/press_releases_media_advisories/2015/
HUDNo_15-049.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
demonstrated a commitment to results.
Promise Zone Designees will receive:
The opportunity to engage Five
AmeriCorps VISTA members in the
Promise Zone; a federal liaison assigned
to assist with navigating federal
programs; preferences for certain
competitive federal programs; technical
assistance from participating agencies;
and Promise Zone tax incentives if
enacted by Congress.
Altogether, this package of assistance
will help local leaders accelerate efforts
to revitalize their communities. The
Promise Zone designation will be for a
term of 10 years, and may be extended
as necessary to capture the full term of
availability of the Promise Zones tax
incentives, if enacted by Congress.
During this term, the specific benefits
made available to Promise Zones will
vary from year to year, and sometimes
more often than annually, due to
changes in an agency’s policies and
changes in appropriations and
authorizations for relevant programs.
All assistance provided to Promise
Zones is subject to applicable
regulations, statutes, and changes in
Federal agency policies, appropriations,
and authorizations for relevant
programs. Subject to these limitations,
the Promise Zone designation commits
the Federal government to partner with
local leaders who are addressing
multiple community revitalization
challenges in a collaborative way and
have demonstrated a commitment to
results.
Third Round Promise Zones Selection
Process
A third and final round of Promise
Zone designations is currently in the
selection process planning stage with
announcements of the designees
expected in spring 2016. HUD
anticipates making at least seven
designations in the third round in the
urban, rural and tribal categories,
depending on resources available. As a
result of the third round competition,
the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) intends to
designate five urban communities and
the Department of Agriculture (USDA)
intends to designate one rural and one
tribal community. This third round of
selections with bring the total number of
Promise Zone designations to 20,
including the five designations
announced in January, 2014, and the
eight announced in April, 2015.
Due to the nature of the Initiative,
Promise Zone activities are likely to be
carried out by a variety of organizations
and organization types. Eligible lead
applicants for Urban Promise Zone
designations are:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices
1. Units of General Local Government
(UGLG or local government); 5
2. An office or department within
local government or a county
government with the support of the
UGLG;
3. Non-profit organizations 6 applying
with the support of the UGLG;
4. Public Housing Agencies,
Community Colleges, Local Education
Agencies (LEAs), or Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (MPO) applying
with the support of the UGLG.
For eligible lead applicants for Rural
and Tribal Promise Zone designations
please refer to the Rural and Tribal
Promise Zone Application Guide
located at https://www.hud.gov/
promisezones.
The selection process under
consideration is that any community
meeting the community eligibility
criteria set forth in the Third Round
Application Guide would be eligible to
apply for Promise Zone designation. All
of the following must be present in an
application for a proposed Promise
Zone to be eligible for designation:
i. Proposed Promise Zone must have
one contiguous boundary and cannot
include separate geographic areas;
ii. The rate of overall poverty or
Extremely Low Income rate (whichever
is greater) of residents within the
Promise Zone must be at or above 32.5
percent;
iii. Promise Zone boundaries must
encompass a population of at least
10,000 but no more than 200,000
residents;
iv. The Promise Zone application
must affirmatively demonstrate support
from all mayors or chief executives of
UGLGs that include any geographical
area within the proposed Promise Zone
boundary, where such city(is),
county(ies), parish(es), or county
equivalent(s) is(are) the sole UGLG(s)
providing general government services
for such geographical area(s), subject to
the following conditions:
a. The chief executive of a city,
county, parish, or county equivalent
may only affirmatively demonstrate
support for the Promise Zone Plan of
one proposed Promise Zone containing
a geographical area in which the city,
county, parish or county equivalent is
the sole provider of general public
services;
b. Subject to the limitation in
paragraph a. above, the chief executive
5 Unit of general local government as defined in
section 102(a)(1) of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)). See
definition (a)(1) Unit of General Local Government.
6 Including Workforce Investment Boards (WIBS)
and Community Action Agencies (CAA). Examples
are illustrative and not exhaustive.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
of a county, parish, or county equivalent
may affirmatively demonstrate support
for the Promise Zone Plan of any
proposed Promise Zone located in the
county, parish, or county equivalent
where another UGLG also provides
general government services;
c. With the exception of paragraph b.
above, if the Mayor or chief executive of
a county, parish or county equivalent
demonstrates affirmative support for the
Promise Zone Plan of more than one
proposed Promise Zone in which the
UGLG he or she represents is the sole
provider of general government services,
all of the applications from that UGLG
will be disqualified from the
competition;
d. Where the proposed Promise Zone
boundaries cross UGLG boundaries, one
Lead Applicant must be identified for
the Promise Zone application, and
commitment must be demonstrated by
the mayors or chief executives of all of
the UGLGs that are sole providers of
general government services for any part
of the proposed Promise Zone
geographical area; and
e. If a Promise Zone designated in
Round 1 or 2 is located within a UGLG
in which a new application is being
submitted, the applicant must include
an explanation of how, if a second
Promise Zone designation is made, the
UGLG that is the sole provider of
general government services plans to
work with both of the Promise Zone
designees at the same time and sustain
the level of effort, resources and support
committed to each Promise Zone under
its respective Promise Zone Plan for the
full term of each Promise Zone
designation. This explanation must be
evidenced by commitments from the
UGLG in materials submitted by the
mayor or chief executive in support of
the application.
Solicitation of Comment
HUD is soliciting public comments on
the proposed selection process, criteria,
and submissions for the third round of
the Promise Zone Initiative that has
been announced through this Federal
Register Notice. The draft Third Round
Urban Application Guide and the draft
Third Round Rural and Tribal
Application Guide can be found at
www.hud.gov/promisezones.
Comments are due by September 28,
2015 and may be submitted at
PromiseZones@hud.gov with ‘‘Third
Round Promise Zone selections’’ in the
subject line.
HUD has created a MAX Survey stage
site in order to allow both applicants
and other stakeholders an opportunity
to experience the proposed intake
mechanism for the third round selection
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45229
process and provide specific feedback
on its operation and functionality. To
access the MAX Survey platform, please
go to: www.hud.gov/promisezones.
Questions or comments may also be
directed by postal mail to: Office of the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Economic Development, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street SW.,
Room 7136, Washington, DC 20410,
ATTN: Third Round Promise Zone
selections.
In addition to providing comments on
the proposed selection process, criteria,
and submissions for the third round of
the Promise Zone Initiative, commenters
are encouraged to address any or all of
the following questions.
A. Overarching Questions
For communities considering a
Promise Zone application:
1. Are the programs that provide
preferential access for designated
Promise Zones helpful? Are there policy
areas or issues that you need to address
that are not represented?
2. If your community is not
designated, but you and your partners
intend to continue community
revitalization efforts, please explain
what particular types of information,
technical assistance, peer exchange,
introductions or other non-competitive
assistance would be helpful to you as
you move your work forward?
3. Do you find the MAX SURVEY
sufficiently easy to use compared to
other federal application systems (e.g.
Grants.Gov)?
4. Would you be willing to provide
the type of information requested in the
Goals and Activities template for
purposes of potentially connecting you
to federal and private partners/peers
that could facilitate your community’s
development work if it were not part of
a competition for a federal designation?
(See MAX SURVEY at www.hud.gov/
promisezones.)
B. Community Development
Marketplace
For users of the Community
Development Marketplace (a database of
strategy and activity information Second
Round applicants permitted HUD and
USDA to share):
5. What kind of potential user are
you? HUD has heard from foundations,
investors, communities, researchers and
national intermediaries and stakeholder
networks, but there may be others who
can use this data.
6. Does the Third Round template
capture information that would be
useful to you? (See MAX SURVEY at
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
45230
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices
www.hud.gov/promisezones.) If yes,
how is this information useful to you?
7. Are there additional pieces of
information that would assist you in
filtering and searching for information
you would like to have?
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
C. Promise Zone Web site
Final Decision on Remand Against
Federal Acknowledgment of the
Duwamish Tribal Organization
8. Is the Web site clear and easy to
use? If not, what elements would be
more helpful? (See www.hud.gov/
promisezones and linked program
information.)
9. Is the interagency program
information presented on the Web site
well-matched to your community’s
needs? If not, what type of information
would be helpful to add?
D. Communications and Stakeholder
Engagement
10. Do you find Promise Zone
communications, through emails,
webinars, written documents and other
means, useful to organizations working
in your community? Please elaborate on
what is useful or what could be done to
make it more useful.
11. How can HUD communicate more
clearly/effectively with residents and
community based organizations about
the way that the Promise Zone Initiative
operates and how it supports local
work?
12. How can the Promise Zone
Initiative better engage new Americans
and immigrant stakeholders?
E. Data Collection, Research and
Evaluation
13. How can the Promise Zones make
use of the EPA Smart Location database?
14. Does the Promise Zone framework
for tracking data address the issue of
burdening designees in terms of data
access and reporting? Are there other
ways we could accomplish this?
15. Is the Promise Zone table of core
indicators, measures, and data sources
useful for community development
outcome tracking? Are there other
measures that should be added?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: July 23, 2015.
Harriet Tregoning,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2015–18626 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of corrections to Final
Decision On Remand.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
the Department of the Interior
(Department) through the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs (AS–IA)
issued corrections to the ‘‘Summary
under the Criteria and Evidence for
Final Decision on Judicial Remand’’
dated July 2, 2015 (Final Decision on
Remand) that declined to acknowledge
that the Duwamish Tribal Organization
(DTO), c/o Cecile Maxwell-Hansen, is
an Indian tribe within the meaning of
Federal law. This notice supplements
the notice of final decision on remand
published in the Federal Register on
July 8, 2015.
DATES: The Final Decision on Remand
(corrected) is final for the Department
on publication of this notice.
ADDRESSES: Requests for a copy of the
Final Decision on Remand (corrected)
should be addressed to the Office of the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs,
Attention: Office of Federal
Acknowledgment, 1951 Constitution
Avenue NW., MS 34B–SIB, Washington,
DC 20240. It is also available through
www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/AS-IA/OFA/
RecentCases/index.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
R. Lee Fleming, Director, Office of
Federal Acknowledgment, (202) 513–
5650.
SUMMARY:
On July 2,
2015, the Department issued a
‘‘Summary under the Criteria and
Evidence for Final Decision on Judicial
Remand’’ (Final Decision on Remand)
declining to acknowledge that the
Duwamish Tribal Organization (DTO),
c/o Cecile Maxwell-Hansen, is an Indian
tribe within the meaning of Federal law.
On July 8, 2015, the Department
published a notice of the Final Decision
on Remand in the Federal Register at 80
FR 39142.
The Final Decision on Remand dated
July 2, 2015, was incomplete. It omitted
language that the AS–IA has determined
should have been included in the final
decision and it omitted an appendix
referenced in the text. The Final
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Decision on Remand dated July 23,
2015, corrects these omissions.
This notice announces the corrections
to the Final Decision on Remand. The
Final Decision on Remand (corrected)
dated July 23, 2015 does not affect the
determination that the petitioner does
not satisfy all seven mandatory criteria
in the either the 1978 or 1994
regulations, 25 CFR part 83. This notice
supplements the Federal Register notice
of the final decision on remand
published on July 8, 2015.
The Final Decision on Remand
(corrected) is final for the Department
on publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
Dated: July 24, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015–18621 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Tribal-State Class III
Gaming Compact taking effect.
AGENCY:
This notice publishes the
Indian Gaming Compact between the
State of New Mexico and the Pueblo of
Taos governing Class III gaming
(Compact) taking effect.
DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR
293.4, all compacts are subject to review
and approval by the Secretary. The
Secretary took no action on the Compact
within 45 days of its submission.
Therefore, the Compact is considered to
have been approved, but only to the
extent the Compact is consistent with
IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45227-45230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18626]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. 5774-N-03]
Promise Zones Initiative: Proposed Third Round Selection Process
Solicitation of Comment
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Through this notice, HUD solicits comment, for a period of 60-
[[Page 45228]]
days, on the proposed selection process, criteria and submissions for
the Third Round of the Promise Zones Initiative.
DATES: Comments Due Date: September 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Questions or comments should be directed by email to
PromiseZones@hud.gov with ``Third Round Promise Zones selection'' in
the subject line. Questions or comments may also be directed by postal
mail to the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic
Development, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street SW., Room 7136, Washington, DC 20410 ATTN: 3nd Round
Promise Zones selection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Herdliska, Office of Community
Planning and Development, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC, 20410; telephone
number 202-402-6758. This is not a toll-free number. Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background--Round 1 and 2 Promise Zones
In his 2013 State of the Union address, President Obama announced
the establishment of the Promise Zones Initiative to partner with high-
poverty communities across the country to create jobs, increase
economic security, expand educational opportunities, increase access to
quality, affordable housing, and improve public safety.\1\ On January
8, 2014, the President announced the first five Promise Zones, which
are located in: San Antonio, TX; Philadelphia, PA; Los Angeles, CA;
Southeastern Kentucky, KY; and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, OK. On
April 28, 2015, the Obama Administration announced eight more Promise
Zones as part of the second round Promise Zone selection process, which
are located in: Camden, NJ; Hartford, CT; Indianapolis, IN;
Minneapolis, MN; Sacramento, CA; St. Louis County, MO; Barnwell, SC;
and Porcupine, SD. Each of these communities (eight urban, one rural,
and one tribal) submitted a plan on how it will partner with local
business and community leaders to make investments that reward hard
work and expand opportunity. In exchange, the Federal government is
helping these Promise Zone designees secure the resources and
flexibility they need to achieve their goals.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/15/fact-sheet-president-s-plan-ensure-hard-work-leads-decent-living.
\2\ See https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/01/08/fact-sheet-president-obama-s-promise-zones-initiative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first five Promise Zones were selected through a competitive
process following an invitation to eligible communities to apply for a
designation, which was issued on October 30, 2013 with an application
deadline of November 26, 2013.\3\ The urban designations were conferred
by HUD while the rural and tribal designations were conferred by USDA.
The pool of eligible applicants was limited to communities with
demonstrated capacity in one or more areas of Promise Zone work that
would prepare them to broaden their efforts to additional
revitalization priorities. Specifically, urban eligibility was limited
to communities encompassing a Choice Neighborhoods or Promise
Neighborhoods Implementation grant, or a Byrne Criminal Justice
Innovation grant, while rural and tribal eligibility was limited to
communities encompassing a Stronger Economies Together, Sustainable
Communities, Promise Neighborhoods Implementation, or Rural Jobs
Accelerator grant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See www.hud.gov/promisezones.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second round Promise Zone selection process opened on August
29, 2014 with an application deadline of November 21, 2014.\4\ This
second round competition designated 8 more communities meeting the
specified eligibility criteria without regard to their prior selection
for receipt of federal grants. As with the first round, the urban
designations were conferred by HUD while the rural and tribal
designations were conferred by USDA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2015/HUDNo_15-049.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Promise Zone Benefits
The Promise Zones Initiative seeks to revitalize high-poverty
communities across the country by creating jobs, increasing economic
activity, improving educational opportunities, reducing violent crime,
leveraging private capital, and assisting local leaders in navigating
federal programs. Promise Zones will not receive grant funding. The
Promise Zone designation partners the Federal government with local
leaders who are addressing multiple community revitalization challenges
in a collaborative way and have demonstrated a commitment to results.
Promise Zone Designees will receive: The opportunity to engage Five
AmeriCorps VISTA members in the Promise Zone; a federal liaison
assigned to assist with navigating federal programs; preferences for
certain competitive federal programs; technical assistance from
participating agencies; and Promise Zone tax incentives if enacted by
Congress.
Altogether, this package of assistance will help local leaders
accelerate efforts to revitalize their communities. The Promise Zone
designation will be for a term of 10 years, and may be extended as
necessary to capture the full term of availability of the Promise Zones
tax incentives, if enacted by Congress. During this term, the specific
benefits made available to Promise Zones will vary from year to year,
and sometimes more often than annually, due to changes in an agency's
policies and changes in appropriations and authorizations for relevant
programs. All assistance provided to Promise Zones is subject to
applicable regulations, statutes, and changes in Federal agency
policies, appropriations, and authorizations for relevant programs.
Subject to these limitations, the Promise Zone designation commits the
Federal government to partner with local leaders who are addressing
multiple community revitalization challenges in a collaborative way and
have demonstrated a commitment to results.
Third Round Promise Zones Selection Process
A third and final round of Promise Zone designations is currently
in the selection process planning stage with announcements of the
designees expected in spring 2016. HUD anticipates making at least
seven designations in the third round in the urban, rural and tribal
categories, depending on resources available. As a result of the third
round competition, the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) intends to designate five urban communities and the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) intends to designate one rural and one tribal
community. This third round of selections with bring the total number
of Promise Zone designations to 20, including the five designations
announced in January, 2014, and the eight announced in April, 2015.
Due to the nature of the Initiative, Promise Zone activities are
likely to be carried out by a variety of organizations and organization
types. Eligible lead applicants for Urban Promise Zone designations
are:
[[Page 45229]]
1. Units of General Local Government (UGLG or local government);
\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Unit of general local government as defined in section
102(a)(1) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42
U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)). See definition (a)(1) Unit of General Local
Government.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. An office or department within local government or a county
government with the support of the UGLG;
3. Non-profit organizations \6\ applying with the support of the
UGLG;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Including Workforce Investment Boards (WIBS) and Community
Action Agencies (CAA). Examples are illustrative and not exhaustive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Public Housing Agencies, Community Colleges, Local Education
Agencies (LEAs), or Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) applying
with the support of the UGLG.
For eligible lead applicants for Rural and Tribal Promise Zone
designations please refer to the Rural and Tribal Promise Zone
Application Guide located at https://www.hud.gov/promisezones.
The selection process under consideration is that any community
meeting the community eligibility criteria set forth in the Third Round
Application Guide would be eligible to apply for Promise Zone
designation. All of the following must be present in an application for
a proposed Promise Zone to be eligible for designation:
i. Proposed Promise Zone must have one contiguous boundary and
cannot include separate geographic areas;
ii. The rate of overall poverty or Extremely Low Income rate
(whichever is greater) of residents within the Promise Zone must be at
or above 32.5 percent;
iii. Promise Zone boundaries must encompass a population of at
least 10,000 but no more than 200,000 residents;
iv. The Promise Zone application must affirmatively demonstrate
support from all mayors or chief executives of UGLGs that include any
geographical area within the proposed Promise Zone boundary, where such
city(is), county(ies), parish(es), or county equivalent(s) is(are) the
sole UGLG(s) providing general government services for such
geographical area(s), subject to the following conditions:
a. The chief executive of a city, county, parish, or county
equivalent may only affirmatively demonstrate support for the Promise
Zone Plan of one proposed Promise Zone containing a geographical area
in which the city, county, parish or county equivalent is the sole
provider of general public services;
b. Subject to the limitation in paragraph a. above, the chief
executive of a county, parish, or county equivalent may affirmatively
demonstrate support for the Promise Zone Plan of any proposed Promise
Zone located in the county, parish, or county equivalent where another
UGLG also provides general government services;
c. With the exception of paragraph b. above, if the Mayor or chief
executive of a county, parish or county equivalent demonstrates
affirmative support for the Promise Zone Plan of more than one proposed
Promise Zone in which the UGLG he or she represents is the sole
provider of general government services, all of the applications from
that UGLG will be disqualified from the competition;
d. Where the proposed Promise Zone boundaries cross UGLG
boundaries, one Lead Applicant must be identified for the Promise Zone
application, and commitment must be demonstrated by the mayors or chief
executives of all of the UGLGs that are sole providers of general
government services for any part of the proposed Promise Zone
geographical area; and
e. If a Promise Zone designated in Round 1 or 2 is located within a
UGLG in which a new application is being submitted, the applicant must
include an explanation of how, if a second Promise Zone designation is
made, the UGLG that is the sole provider of general government services
plans to work with both of the Promise Zone designees at the same time
and sustain the level of effort, resources and support committed to
each Promise Zone under its respective Promise Zone Plan for the full
term of each Promise Zone designation. This explanation must be
evidenced by commitments from the UGLG in materials submitted by the
mayor or chief executive in support of the application.
Solicitation of Comment
HUD is soliciting public comments on the proposed selection
process, criteria, and submissions for the third round of the Promise
Zone Initiative that has been announced through this Federal Register
Notice. The draft Third Round Urban Application Guide and the draft
Third Round Rural and Tribal Application Guide can be found at
www.hud.gov/promisezones.
Comments are due by September 28, 2015 and may be submitted at
PromiseZones@hud.gov with ``Third Round Promise Zone selections'' in
the subject line.
HUD has created a MAX Survey stage site in order to allow both
applicants and other stakeholders an opportunity to experience the
proposed intake mechanism for the third round selection process and
provide specific feedback on its operation and functionality. To access
the MAX Survey platform, please go to: www.hud.gov/promisezones.
Questions or comments may also be directed by postal mail to:
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW.,
Room 7136, Washington, DC 20410, ATTN: Third Round Promise Zone
selections.
In addition to providing comments on the proposed selection
process, criteria, and submissions for the third round of the Promise
Zone Initiative, commenters are encouraged to address any or all of the
following questions.
A. Overarching Questions
For communities considering a Promise Zone application:
1. Are the programs that provide preferential access for designated
Promise Zones helpful? Are there policy areas or issues that you need
to address that are not represented?
2. If your community is not designated, but you and your partners
intend to continue community revitalization efforts, please explain
what particular types of information, technical assistance, peer
exchange, introductions or other non-competitive assistance would be
helpful to you as you move your work forward?
3. Do you find the MAX SURVEY sufficiently easy to use compared to
other federal application systems (e.g. Grants.Gov)?
4. Would you be willing to provide the type of information
requested in the Goals and Activities template for purposes of
potentially connecting you to federal and private partners/peers that
could facilitate your community's development work if it were not part
of a competition for a federal designation? (See MAX SURVEY at
www.hud.gov/promisezones.)
B. Community Development Marketplace
For users of the Community Development Marketplace (a database of
strategy and activity information Second Round applicants permitted HUD
and USDA to share):
5. What kind of potential user are you? HUD has heard from
foundations, investors, communities, researchers and national
intermediaries and stakeholder networks, but there may be others who
can use this data.
6. Does the Third Round template capture information that would be
useful to you? (See MAX SURVEY at
[[Page 45230]]
www.hud.gov/promisezones.) If yes, how is this information useful to
you?
7. Are there additional pieces of information that would assist you
in filtering and searching for information you would like to have?
C. Promise Zone Web site
8. Is the Web site clear and easy to use? If not, what elements
would be more helpful? (See www.hud.gov/promisezones and linked program
information.)
9. Is the interagency program information presented on the Web site
well-matched to your community's needs? If not, what type of
information would be helpful to add?
D. Communications and Stakeholder Engagement
10. Do you find Promise Zone communications, through emails,
webinars, written documents and other means, useful to organizations
working in your community? Please elaborate on what is useful or what
could be done to make it more useful.
11. How can HUD communicate more clearly/effectively with residents
and community based organizations about the way that the Promise Zone
Initiative operates and how it supports local work?
12. How can the Promise Zone Initiative better engage new Americans
and immigrant stakeholders?
E. Data Collection, Research and Evaluation
13. How can the Promise Zones make use of the EPA Smart Location
database?
14. Does the Promise Zone framework for tracking data address the
issue of burdening designees in terms of data access and reporting? Are
there other ways we could accomplish this?
15. Is the Promise Zone table of core indicators, measures, and
data sources useful for community development outcome tracking? Are
there other measures that should be added?
Dated: July 23, 2015.
Harriet Tregoning,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-18626 Filed 7-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P