Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement, 45233 [2015-18578]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices
On June 22, 2015, Enterprise,
Remaining Respondents, and Google
jointly moved to terminate the
investigation in its entirety based upon
settlement. On June 29, 2015, the
Commission investigative attorney filed
a response in support of the motion. No
other responses to the motion were
received.
The ALJ issued the subject ID on July
1, 2015, and a corrected version on July
17, 2015, granting the joint motion for
termination. The ALJ found that the
settlement agreement satisfies the
requirements of Commission Rule
210.21(b). She further found, pursuant
to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2), that
there is no indication that termination
of the investigation would adversely
impact the public interest. No one
petitioned for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID as corrected. In light of
the settlement, the Commission has
determined to vacate Order No. 34 as
moot.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 23, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–18485 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–931]
Certain Formatted Magnetic Data
Storage Tapes and Cartridges
Containing Same; Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the
Investigation Based on Settlement
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 19) by the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
terminating the above-captioned
investigation based on settlement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–2661. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 29, 2014, based on a
complaint filed by Advanced Research
Corporation of White Bear Lake,
Minnesota (‘‘ARC’’). 79 FR 58382–83
(Sept. 29, 2014). The complaint alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337), based on infringement of five
U.S. patents. The notice of investigation,
as amended, named the following
respondents: Fujifilm Holdings
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm
Recording Media USA, Inc., of Bedford,
Massachusetts; Oracle Corporation of
Redwood Shores, California; Oracle
America, Inc., of Redwood Shores,
California; and International Business
Machines Corp. of Armonk, New York.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations was also named as a
party. Id. at 58383; 79 FR 78905 (Dec.
31, 2014).
On June 19, 2015, ARC and all
respondents filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation based on a
settlement agreement between ARC and
all respondents. On June 26, 2015, the
Commission investigative attorney filed
a response supporting the motion.
On June 29, 2015, the ALJ issued the
subject ID, granting the motion to
terminate the investigation. The ALJ
found that the motion complied with
Commission Rules and that termination
would be in the public interest. No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45233
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 24, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–18578 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on June
29, 2015, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Members of SGIP
2.0, Inc. (‘‘MSGIP 2.0’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, National Energy
Technology Laboratory (NETL),
Morgantown, WV; Open Geospatial
Consortium (OGC), Wayland, MA;
OMNETRIC Corp., Minnetonka, MN;
National Instruments, Austin, TX; Opus
One Solutions, Richmond Hill, Ontario,
CANADA; ITOCHU Corporation, Tokyo,
JAPAN; GridIntellect LLC, Madison, AL;
Inman Technology, Cambridge, MA;
Xtensible Solutions, Greenwood Village,
CO; and Southern California Edison
(SCE), Westminster, CA, have been
added as parties to this venture.
Also, Kyocera Telecommunications
Research Center (KTRC), Fremont, CA;
The Associated General Contractors of
America, Arlington, VA; RCES Center
from Univ. of Texas at El Paso, El Paso,
TX; Arizona Public Service Company,
Phoenix, AZ; California Independent
System Operator Corporation, Folsom,
CA; CenterPoint Energy Houston
Electric, Houston, TX; Clevest
Solutions, Inc., Richmond, British
Columbia, CANADA; Coordinated
Science Laboratory—University of
Illinois, Urbana, IL; HomePlug
Powerline Alliance, Inc., Beaverton, OR;
India Smart Grid Forum (ISGF), New
Delhi, INDIA; Kottage Industries LLC,
Worthington, OH; Mitsubishi Electric
Research Labs, Cambridge, MA;
MobiComm Communications, The
Hague, NETHERLANDS;
Telecommunications Industry
Association (TIA), Arlington, VA;
Tennessee Valley Authority,
Chattanooga, TN; UPnP Forum,
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 45233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18578]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-931]
Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges
Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 19) by the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation based on
settlement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2661. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on September 29, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Advanced Research
Corporation of White Bear Lake, Minnesota (``ARC''). 79 FR 58382-83
(Sept. 29, 2014). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based on
infringement of five U.S. patents. The notice of investigation, as
amended, named the following respondents: Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm
Recording Media USA, Inc., of Bedford, Massachusetts; Oracle
Corporation of Redwood Shores, California; Oracle America, Inc., of
Redwood Shores, California; and International Business Machines Corp.
of Armonk, New York. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was
also named as a party. Id. at 58383; 79 FR 78905 (Dec. 31, 2014).
On June 19, 2015, ARC and all respondents filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement between ARC
and all respondents. On June 26, 2015, the Commission investigative
attorney filed a response supporting the motion.
On June 29, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the
motion to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion
complied with Commission Rules and that termination would be in the
public interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 24, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-18578 Filed 7-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P