Freedom of Information Act Regulations, 45101-45115 [2015-18388]
Download as PDF
45101
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 145
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 103
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2009–0036]
RIN 1601–AA00
Freedom of Information Act
Regulations
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes to amend
the Department of Homeland Security’s
(DHS) regulations under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). The
Department (DHS) is proposing to
update and streamline the language of
several procedural provisions, and to
incorporate changes brought about by
the amendments to the FOIA under the
OPEN Government Act of 2007, among
other changes. DHS invites comment on
all aspects of this proposal.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be submitted to the docket for this
rulemaking, DHS–2009–0036, on or
before September 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2009–0036, by one of the following
methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–343–4011.
(3) Mail: By mail to the Department of
Homeland Security, Office of the Chief
Privacy Officer, ATTN: James Holzer,
245 Murray Lane SW., STOP–0655,
Washington, DC 20528–0655.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change and may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Holzer, Senior Director, FOIA
Operations, Office of the Chief Privacy
Officer, Department of Homeland
Security, at 1–866–431–0486.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Secretary of Homeland Security
has authority under 5 U.S.C. 301, 552,
and 552a, and 6 U.S.C. 112(e), to issue
FOIA and Privacy Act regulations. On
January 27, 2003, the Department of
Homeland Security (Department or
DHS) published an interim rule in the
Federal Register (68 FR 4056) that
established DHS procedures for
obtaining agency records under the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552, or Privacy Act, 5
U.S.C. 552a. DHS solicited comments on
this interim rule, but received none.1
In 2005, Executive Order 13392 called
for the designation of a Chief FOIA
Officer and FOIA Public Liaisons, along
with the establishment of FOIA
Requester Service Centers as
appropriate. Subsequently, the
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our
National Government Act of 2007
(OPEN Government Act), Public Law
110–175, required agencies to designate
a Chief FOIA Officer who is then to
designate one or more FOIA Public
Liaisons (5 U.S.C. 552(j) and 552(k)(6)).
Sections 6, 7, 9, and 10 of the OPEN
Government Act amended provisions of
the FOIA by setting time limits for
agencies to act on misdirected requests
and limiting the tolling of response
times (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)); requiring
tracking numbers for requests that will
take more than 10 days to process (5
U.S.C. 552 (a)(7)(A)); providing
requesters a telephone line or Internet
service to obtain information about the
status of their requests, including an
estimated date of completion (5 U.S.C.
1 This rule proposes revisions to DHS’s FOIA
regulations, but not its Privacy Act regulations. DHS
intends to finalize its Privacy Act regulations by
separate rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
552(a)(7)(B)); expanding the definition
of ‘‘record’’ to include records
‘‘maintained for an agency by an entity
under Government contract, for the
purposes of records management’’ (5
U.S.C. 552(f)(2)); and introducing
alternative dispute resolution to the
FOIA process through FOIA Public
Liaisons (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii) & (l))
and the Office of Government
Information Services (5 U.S.C.
552(h)(3)).
DHS now proposes to revise its FOIA
regulations at 6 CFR part 5, which apply
to all components of DHS. This
proposed rule would implement
changes required by the OPEN
Government Act and make other
revisions to DHS FOIA regulations to
improve access to Departmental records.
DHS describes the primary proposed
changes in the section-by-section
analysis below. DHS invites public
comment on each of the proposed
changes described, as well as any other
matters within the scope of the
rulemaking.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
The proposed rules continue to
inform the public of the responsibilities
of DHS in conjunction with requests
received under the Freedom of
Information Act as well as the
requirements for filing a proper FOIA
request.
DHS is proposing to amend Subpart A
to eliminate the provision for ‘‘brick and
mortar’’ public reading rooms, amend
DHS rules for third-party requests for
records, and add information about
proactive DHS disclosures.
Section 5.1
General Provisions
DHS is proposing to amend this part
to incorporate reference to additional
DHS policies and procedures relevant to
the FOIA process. These resources,
which are available at https://
www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-actfoia, also include descriptions of the
types of records maintained by different
DHS components. DHS is also
proposing to amend this section to
clarify the definition of a component for
purposes of this proposed rule.
Component means each separate
organizational entity within DHS that
reports directly to the Office of the
Secretary. A full list of all DHS
components would be provided in
appendix I of this proposed rule (as well
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
45102
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
as in the web resources described above)
for informational purposes.
DHS is proposing to add paragraph (d)
to section 5.1, ‘‘Unofficial release of
DHS information.’’ This proposed
paragraph seeks to inform the public
about how information that is not
released through official DHS channels
will be treated in the FOIA process.
DHS does not consider information that
is either inadvertently or
inappropriately released by means other
than the official release process used by
DHS, whether in FOIA or otherwise, to
be a FOIA release and accordingly, DHS
does not waive its ability to assert
exemptions to withhold some or all of
the same records in response to a FOIA
request.
Finally, DHS is proposing to remove
at least two additional portions of
current section 5.1. First, current
paragraph (a)(1) clarifies that
‘‘[i]nformation routinely provided to the
public as part of a regular DHS activity
. . . may be provided to the public
without following this subpart.’’
Second, current paragraph (a)(2)
provides that ‘‘Departmental
components may issue their own
guidance under this subpart pursuant to
approval by DHS.’’ DHS considers each
of these provisions to be self-evident,
and therefore proposes to remove them
from the regulation.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 5.2 Proactive Disclosures of
DHS Records
DHS proposes to replace prior section
5.2, ‘‘Public Reading Rooms,’’ which
was outdated, with a new section
describing the proactive disclosure of
DHS records. The FOIA requires DHS to
make certain records available for
public inspection and copying. Such
records are available via the internet
through the electronic reading rooms of
each component. For those individuals
with no access to the internet, the DHS
Privacy Office or the component Public
Liaison can provide assistance with
access to records available in the
electronic reading rooms. Contact
information is provided in Appendix I
to this subpart.
Section 5.3 Requirements for Making
Requests
DHS proposes to amend paragraph
5.3(a) to eliminate the requirement that
third-party requesters of records
pertaining to an individual provide a
written authorization from the
individual that is the subject of the
records (or proof of death of the
individual) as a prerequisite to making
such a request for records. As proposed,
paragraph (a)(4) would inform thirdparty requesters that they may receive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
greater access if they provide written
authorization from, or proof of death of,
the subject of the records. In certain
circumstances, they may in fact receive
no access absent such authorization or
proof. This paragraph would further
advise that DHS may exercise its
administrative discretion in seeking
additional information from the
requester to ensure that the proper
consent has been received from the
subject of the records.
DHS also proposes to amend
paragraph (b) to direct requesters to
contact the FOIA Public Liaison for each
component if the requester has
questions about how to describe the
records that the requester seeks. DHS
also proposes to amend this part to
eliminate paragraph (c), which would be
addressed under section 5.11, ‘‘Fees.’’
DHS proposes to insert a new paragraph
(c), which describes the process under
which DHS may administratively close
a request if a requester fails to comply
with a request for additional
information.
Section 5.4 Responsibility for
Responding to Requests
DHS proposes to insert a new
paragraph (c), ‘‘Re-routing of
misdirected requests,’’ to advise
requesters that a component that is in
receipt of a misdirected request within
DHS will redirect such a request to the
proper component without the need for
further action from the requester. In the
event that a component receives a
request that should be directed outside
DHS entirely, the component would
inform the requester that DHS does not
collect or retain the type of records
requested. Proposed paragraph (c)
would cover a different situation than
current paragraph (c), which only
applies ‘‘[w]hen a component receives a
request for a record in its possession.’’
DHS proposes to combine paragraph
5.4(c), ‘‘Consultations and referrals,’’
with current paragraph (d), ‘‘Law
Enforcement Information,’’ which
covers consultation and referral of law
enforcement records. Proposed
paragraph (d) would describe the
process of consultation, coordination,
and referral of all records, to include
law enforcement records, consistent
with equities of components, agencies,
or departments other than the
responding component. Proposed
paragraph (e) restates much of the
current content of section 5.7,
‘‘Classified information.’’
DHS proposes to revise current
paragraph (f), ‘‘Notice of referral.’’
Paragraph (f) currently provides that
when a component refers a request to
another component or agency, it
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ordinarily shall notify the requester of
such referral. Consistent with current
law, DHS proposes to insert an
exception to this requirement, such that
the component should not refer the
records if disclosure of the identity of
the component or agency would harm
an interest protected by an applicable
exemption. Instead, the component
should coordinate the response with the
other component or agency, as
appropriate.
DHS proposes a new paragraph,
paragraph 5.4(i), ‘‘Electronic records
and searches,’’ to advise requesters of
DHS’s responsibilities under the FOIA
with regard to conducting searches of
electronic records and databases. DHS
adheres to the requirement in 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(3)(C), which states that agencies
will make reasonable efforts to search
for records in electronic form or format,
except when such efforts would
significantly interfere with the operation
of the agency’s automated information
systems. Proposed paragraph 5.4(i)
seeks to clarify to requesters the types
of situations that would amount to
‘‘significant interference’’ with the
operation of agency information systems
such that DHS would not conduct a
search for the requested records.
Section 5.5
Requests
Timing of Responses to
DHS proposes to amend paragraph
5.5(a) to advise requesters that the
response time for misdirected requests
that are re-routed under paragraph 5.4(c)
will commence on the date the request
is received by the proper component,
but in any event, no later than ten
working days after the request is first
received by any component. DHS
proposes to amend paragraph (b),
‘‘Multitrack Processing,’’ to include a
specific provision for a track for
requests granted expedited processing.
DHS proposes to split current
paragraph (c), ‘‘Unusual
Circumstances,’’ into two separately
designated paragraphs. As revised, the
rule would include in paragraph 5.5(d)
information on how DHS will aggregate
multiple related requests submitted by a
single requester or a group of requesters
acting in concert.
DHS also proposes to redesignate
current paragraph 5.5(d), ‘‘Expedited
Processing,’’ as paragraph 5.5(e). DHS
proposes in proposed paragraph 5.5(e)
to amend text that describes the
procedures for making a request for
expedited processing of an initial
request or an appeal (current paragraph
(d)), to include two new available
justifications for requesting expedited
processing.
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
5.6 Responses to requests. DHS
proposes to revise paragraph 5.6(a) to
encourage components to communicate
with FOIA requesters having access to
the internet through electronic means,
to the extent practicable. This new
paragraph is intended to address the
increasing number of FOIA requesters
who are corresponding with DHS via
electronic mail and web portals. DHS
proposes to move paragraph (a) to
paragraph (b), ‘‘Acknowledgment of
Requests.’’ DHS proposes to amend this
paragraph to specify that DHS and its
components will acknowledge a request
and assign the request an individualized
tracking number if the request will take
more than ten working days to process.
DHS also proposes to require
acknowledgment letters to contain a
brief description of the request to allow
requesters to more easily keep track of
their requests. The provision in
paragraph (a) referencing that the
acknowledgment letter will confirm the
requester’s agreement to pay fees would
be addressed in proposed section
5.11(e).
DHS proposes to move paragraph (b),
‘‘Grants of requests,’’ to paragraph (c).
DHS proposes to amend paragraph (b)
by removing the description of the
treatment of information, both released
and redacted in documents provided to
the requester. Substantially the same
information is now included in a new
proposed paragraph, paragraph 5.6(f),
‘‘Markings on Released Documents.’’
DHS proposes to move the remainder of
current paragraph 5.6(c), ‘‘Adverse
determinations of requests,’’ to two
paragraphs, (d) and (e), ‘‘Adverse
determinations of requests’’ and
‘‘Content of denial.’’ The language
regarding adverse determination of
requests remains substantially the same.
DHS proposes to describe the content
and process for denial letters in the
newly proposed paragraph (e), but does
not intend this paragraph to
significantly change the current
regulatory requirements concerning
denial letters.
DHS also proposes new paragraph (g),
‘‘Use of record exclusions,’’ which
describes the DHS’s use of exclusions
under 5 U.S.C. 552(c). This paragraph
proposes to incorporate the requirement
set forth by the Department of Justice’s
Office of Information Policy (OIP) that
all federal agencies obtain the approval
of OIP prior to invoking an exclusion.
This proposed paragraph also includes
a requirement that DHS maintain an
administrative record of the process of
the invocation of the exclusion and
approval by OIP.
5.7 Confidential commercial
information. Proposed section 5.7,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
‘‘Confidential commercial information,’’
would replace current section 5.8 of the
current regulations, ‘‘Business
information.’’ DHS proposes to reorder
several paragraphs within this section.
The changes are for clarity and to better
advise requesters and providers of
commercial information how DHS will
treat requests for confidential
commercial information, but the
information contained in the proposed
section remains substantively the same.
DHS proposes to amend the ‘‘Notice
of intent to disclose’’ paragraph by
splitting it into two paragraphs,
proposed new paragraph (f), ‘‘Analysis
of objections’’ and proposed new
paragraph (g), ‘‘Notice of intent to
disclose.’’ The proposed division of the
information previously contained in a
single paragraph is intended to improve
clarity by highlighting in a separate
paragraph that DHS will consider a
submitter’s objections and specific
grounds for nondisclosure in deciding
whether to disclose the requested
information. Otherwise, the information
contained in the new proposed
paragraphs remains substantively the
same.
Finally, DHS proposes to include an
exception to this section for commercial
information provided to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) by a
business submitter. Although CBP’s
FOIA regulations (located at 19 CFR part
103, subpart A) are displaced by the
DHS FOIA regulations, this rule
proposes to allow CBP to continue
treating commercial information in the
same manner as it has since the
promulgation of current 19 CFR 103.35.
5.8 Administrative appeals. This
section corresponds to section 5.9 of the
current regulations. In the time
following the publication of the interim
regulations in January 2003, DHS has
designated Appeals Officers for each
component. As such, DHS proposes to
amend paragraph (a) to direct requesters
seeking to appeal adverse
determinations to the DHS Web site or
FOIA phone line for FOIA information
to obtain the name and address of the
appropriate appeals officer.
DHS proposes new paragraph (b)
‘‘Adjudication of appeal,’’ which
replaces former paragraph (c) ‘‘When
appeal is required.’’ The proposed new
paragraph informs requesters that the
DHS Office of the General Counsel or its
designee component appeals officers are
the authorized appeals authority for
DHS. New proposed paragraph (b) also
informs requesters about the treatment
of appeals involving classified
information. Finally, former paragraph
(a)(3), which informs requesters that
appeals will not normally be
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45103
adjudicated if a FOIA lawsuit is filed, is
incorporated into proposed paragraph
(b).
DHS proposes to add a new paragraph
(c), ‘‘Appeal decisions,’’ which is
substantially similar to current
paragraph 5.9(b). Proposed paragraph (c)
would advise requesters that appeal
decisions will be made in writing, and
that decisions will inform requesters of
their right to file a lawsuit and about
mediation services offered by the Office
of Government Information Services.
Proposed paragraph (c) would also
advise requesters of what to expect if
the appeals officer reverses or modifies
the original administrative decision on
appeal. DHS also proposes to add a new
paragraph (d), ‘‘Time limit for issuing
appeal decision,’’ which advises
requesters of the statutory 20-day time
limit for responding to appeals, and also
of the statutory 10-day extension of the
20-day limit available to the appeals
officers in certain circumstances.
Finally, DHS proposes to add
paragraph (e), ‘‘Appeal necessary before
seeking court review,’’ which advises
requesters that an administrative appeal
is generally required before seeking
judicial review of a component’s
adverse determination. This language is
substantially similar to current
paragraph 5.9(c). This proposed
paragraph also advises requesters that
there is no administrative appeal
requirement prior to seeking judicial
review of a denial of request for
expedited processing.
5.9 Preservation of records. DHS
proposes to redesignate current section
5.10 ‘‘Preservation of records’’ as section
5.9. There is no change to the
substantive information in the section.
5.10 FOIA requests for information
contained in a Privacy Act system of
records. DHS proposes to add the new
above-referenced section, to explain to
requesters how DHS treats FOIA
requests for information protected by
the Privacy Act. When applicable, DHS
analyzes all requests under both the
FOIA and the Privacy Act to ensure that
the requester receives the greatest
amount of information possible under
federal law. This proposed section also
explains the circumstances under which
a third-party requester can obtain access
to information protected by the Privacy
Act.
5.11 Fees. DHS proposes to address
all fee issues in section 5.11. Most of
this section remains essentially
unchanged. Proposed changes to
paragraph (b) would clarify some of the
definitions used by DHS in determining
a requester’s fee category. For instance,
paragraph (b)(1) ‘‘Commercial use
request,’’ would clarify that components
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
45104
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
will make determinations on
commercial use on a case-by-case basis.
Paragraph (b)(4) ‘‘Educational
institution,’’ would add several
examples to help requesters understand
the analysis that DHS will apply to
determine whether a requester meets the
criteria to be considered an educational
institution. Paragraph (b)(6), ‘‘News
media,’’ clarifies the criteria used by
DHS to determine whether a requester
qualifies to be considered a member of
the news media for fee purposes.
Paragraph (b)(8) ‘‘Search,’’ would
eliminate superfluous language that
does not improve the comprehensibility
of the paragraph. Because these and
similar proposed changes are consistent
with current regulations and describe
current process, DHS does not expect
that they will result in additional costs
for the government or the public.
DHS also proposes to change
paragraph (c)(1)(iii), which discusses
direct costs associated with conducting
any search that requires the creation of
a new computer program, as discussed
in new proposed paragraph 5.4(i), to
locate the requested records. This
change is intended to improve
comprehension and to more accurately
describe the circumstances under which
a requester may be charged for a
computerized search or a search of
electronic records. It does not represent
a change in practice, as DHS currently
charges direct costs for specialized data
searches. Again, because these proposed
changes are consistent with current
regulations and describe current
process, DHS does not expect that they
will result in additional costs for the
government or the public.
DHS proposes to restructure
paragraph (c)(3)(d), ‘‘Restrictions on
charging fees.’’ Under this proposal,
search fees, and in some cases,
duplication fees may not be charged if
a component fails to comply with the
time limits in which to respond to a
request provided no unusual or
exceptional circumstances are present.
This provision directly tracks a
mandatory provision from section 6 of
the OPEN Government Act of 2007,
Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat. 2524, 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(viii).
In addition, DHS proposes to
renumber former paragraph (d)(2) as
paragraph (d)(3), and paragraph (d)(3) as
(d)(4). DHS proposes minor changes in
paragraph (d)(4) to improve clarity.
Current paragraphs (d)(4) and (d)(5)
would be combined into proposed
paragraph (d)(5). DHS proposes changes
to paragraphs (e) and (f) to improve
clarity; no significant changes are
intended with respect to those
paragraphs. DHS proposes no major
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:11 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
changes to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), or (j),
but proposes to modify a number of
procedural provisions consistent with
the practices of other agencies in this
area. DHS also proposes minor changes
to paragraph (k) to improve clarity. DHS
proposes to eliminate current paragraph
(l), ‘‘Payment of outstanding fees,’’ as
the information in that paragraph is
largely duplicative of the information
contained within proposed paragraph
(i)(3)—although proposed paragraph
(i)(3) is discretionary, DHS anticipates
that the result will be substantially the
same as under current paragraph (l).
Except in extraordinary circumstances,
DHS will not process a FOIA request
from persons with an unpaid fee from
any previous FOIA request to any
Federal agency until that outstanding
fee has been paid in full to the agency.
Finally, DHS proposes to insert a chart
showing fee applicability, for ease of
reference.
5.12 Confidential commercial
information; CBP procedures.
As noted above, DHS proposes to
include an exception to proposed § 5.7
for commercial information provided to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) by a business submitter. Although
CBP’s FOIA regulations (located at 19
CFR part 103, subpart A) are displaced
by the DHS FOIA regulations, because
of the unique nature of CBP’s mission,
this rule proposes to allow CBP to
continue treating commercial
information in the same manner as it
has since the promulgation of current 19
CFR 103.35. CBP’s FOIA regulations,
located at 19 CFR part 103, subpart A,
will be removed no later than the
effective date of the final rule for this
rulemaking. CBP may, however, retain
cCurrent 19 CFR 103.35 as an interim
measure.
5.13 Other rights and services. DHS
proposes no substantive changes to this
section.
FEMA Regulations
DHS also proposes to remove FEMA’s
outdated FOIA regulations at 44 CFR
part 5, subparts A through E. FEMA is
currently operating under DHS’s title 6
FOIA regulations for all purposes.
III. Regulatory Analyses
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563—
Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has not been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
DHS has considered the costs and
benefits of this proposed rule.
Previously in this preamble, DHS has
provided a section-by-section analysis
of the provisions in this proposed rule
and concludes this rule does not impose
additional costs on the public or the
government. This rule does not collect
any additional fee revenues compared to
current practices or otherwise introduce
new regulatory mandates. The rule’s
benefits include additional clarity for
the public and DHS personnel with
respect to DHS’s implementation of the
FOIA and subsequent statutory
amendments.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, and section
213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5
U.S.C. 601 note, agencies must consider
the impact of their rulemakings on
‘‘small entities’’ (small businesses, small
organizations and local governments).
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. DHS
has reviewed this regulation and by
approving it certifies that this regulation
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Based on the previous
discussion in this preamble, DHS does
not believe this rule imposes any
additional direct costs on small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (as amended), 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in
an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects
6 CFR Part 5
Classified information, Courts,
Freedom of information, Government
employees, Privacy.
19 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Courts, Freedom of
information, Law enforcement, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
44 CFR Part 5
Courts, Freedom of information,
Government employees.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Homeland
Security proposes to amend 6 CFR
chapter I, part 5, 19 CFR chapter I, part
103, and 44 CFR chapter I, part 5, as
follows:
Title 6—Domestic Security
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OR
PRODUCTION OF MATERIAL OR
INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 5
U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; E.O. 13392.
2. In Chapter I, revise subpart A of
part 5 to read as follows:
■
Subpart A—Procedures for Disclosure
of Records Under the Freedom of
Information Act
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Sec.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
General provisions.
Proactive disclosures of DHS records.
Requirements for making requests.
Responsibility for responding to
requests.
5.5 Timing of responses to requests.
5.6 Responses to requests.
5.7 Confidential commercial information.
5.8 Administrative appeals.
5.9 Preservation of records.
5.10 FOIA requests for information
contained in a Privacy Act system of
records.
5.11 Fees.
5.12 Confidential commercial information;
CBP procedures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
5.13 Other rights and services.
Appendix I to Subpart A—FOIA Contact
Information
Subpart A—Procedures for Disclosure
of Records Under the Freedom of
Information Act
§ 5.1
General provisions.
(a)(1) This subpart contains the rules
that the Department of Homeland
Security follows in processing requests
for records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 as
amended. The Freedom of Information
Act applies to third-party requests for
documents concerning the general
activities of the government and of DHS
in particular. When an individual
requests access to his or her own
records, it is considered a Privacy Act
request. Such records are maintained by
DHS under the individual’s name or
personal identifier. Although requests
are considered either FOIA requests or
Privacy Act requests, agencies process
requests in accordance with both laws,
which provides the greatest degree of
lawful access while safeguarding an
individual’s personal privacy.
(2) These rules should be read in
conjunction with the text of the FOIA
and the Uniform Freedom of
Information Fee Schedule and
Guidelines published by the Office of
Management and Budget at 52 FR 10012
(March 27, 1987) (hereinafter ‘‘OMB
Guidelines’’). Additionally, DHS has
additional policies and procedures
relevant to the FOIA process. These
resources are available at https://
www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-actfoia. Requests made by individuals for
records about themselves under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are
processed under subpart B of part 5 as
well as under this subpart. As a matter
of policy, DHS makes discretionary
disclosures of records or information
exempt from disclosure under the FOIA
whenever disclosure would not
foreseeably harm an interest protected
by a FOIA exemption, but this policy
does not create any right enforceable in
court.
(b) As referenced in this subpart,
component means the FOIA office of
each separate organizational entity
within DHS that reports directly to the
Office of the Secretary.
(c) DHS has a decentralized system for
processing requests, with each
component handling requests for its
records.
(d) Unofficial release of DHS
information. The disclosure of exempt
records, without authorization by the
appropriate DHS official, is not an
official release of information;
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45105
accordingly, it is not a FOIA release.
Such a release does not waive the
authority of the Department of
Homeland Security to assert FOIA
exemptions to withhold the same
records in response to a FOIA request.
In addition, while the authority may
exist to disclose records to individuals
in their official capacity, the provisions
of this part apply if the same individual
seeks the records in a private or
personal capacity.
§ 5.2
Proactive disclosure of DHS records.
Records that are required by the FOIA
to be made available for public
inspection and copying are accessible
on DHS’s Web site, https://www.dhs.gov/
freedom-information-act-foia-andprivacy-act. Each component is
responsible for determining which of its
records are required to be made publicly
available, as well as identifying
additional records of interest to the
public that are appropriate for public
disclosure, and for posting and indexing
such records. Each component shall
ensure that posted records and indices
are updated on an ongoing basis. Each
component has a FOIA Public Liaison
who can assist individuals in locating
records particular to a component. A list
of DHS’s FOIA Public Liaisons is
available at https://www.dhs.gov/foiacontact-information and in appendix I
to this subpart. If you have no access to
the internet, please contact the Public
Liaison for the component from which
you are seeking records for assistance
with publicly available records.
§ 5.3
Requirements for making requests.
(a) General information. (1) DHS has
a decentralized system for responding to
FOIA requests, with each component
designating a FOIA office to process
records from that component. All
components have the capability to
receive requests electronically, either
through email or a web portal. To make
a request for DHS records, a requester
should write directly to the FOIA office
of the component that maintains the
records being sought. A request will
receive the quickest possible response if
it is addressed to the FOIA office of the
component that maintains the records
sought. DHS’s FOIA Reference Guide
contains or refers the reader to
descriptions of the functions of each
component and provides other
information that is helpful in
determining where to make a request.
Each component’s FOIA office and any
additional requirements for submitting a
request to a given component are listed
in Appendix I of this subpart. These
references can all be used by requesters
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
45106
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
to determine where to send their
requests within DHS.
(2) A requester may also send his or
her request to the Privacy Office, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, 245
Murray Lane SW STOP–0655, or via the
internet at https://www.dhs.gov/dhs-foiarequest-submission-form, or via fax to
(202) 343–4011. The Privacy Office will
forward the request to the component(s)
that it determines to be most likely to
maintain the records that are sought.
(3) A requester who is making a
request for records about him or herself
must comply with the verification of
identity provision set forth in subpart B
of this part.
(4) Where a request for records
pertains to a third party, a requester may
receive greater access by submitting
either a notarized authorization signed
by that individual, in compliance with
the verification of identity provision set
forth in subpart B of this part, or a
declaration made in compliance with
the requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C.
1746 by that individual, authorizing
disclosure of the records to the
requester, or by submitting proof that
the individual is deceased (e.g., a copy
of a death certificate or an obituary). As
an exercise of its administrative
discretion, each component can require
a requester to supply additional
information if necessary in order to
verify that a particular individual has
consented to disclosure.
(b) Description of records sought.
Requesters must describe the records
sought in sufficient detail to enable DHS
personnel to locate them with a
reasonable amount of effort. A
reasonable description contains
sufficient information to permit an
organized, non-random search for the
record based on the component’s filing
arrangements and existing retrieval
systems. To the extent possible,
requesters should include specific
information that may assist a
component in identifying the requested
records, such as the date, title or name,
author, recipient, subject matter of the
record, case number, file designation, or
reference number. Requesters should
refer to Appendix I of this subpart for
additional component-specific
requirements. In general, requesters
should include as much detail as
possible about the specific records or
the types of records that they are
seeking. Before submitting their
requests, requesters may contact the
component’s FOIA Officer or FOIA
public liaison to discuss the records
they are seeking and to receive
assistance in describing the records. If
after receiving a request, a component
determines that it does not reasonably
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
describe the records sought, the
component should inform the requester
what additional information is needed
or why the request is otherwise
insufficient. Requesters who are
attempting to reformulate or modify
such a request may discuss their request
with the component’s designated FOIA
Officer, its FOIA Public Liaison, or a
representative of the DHS Privacy
Office, each of whom is available to
assist the requester in reasonably
describing the records sought. If a
request does not reasonably describe the
records sought, the agency’s response to
the request may be delayed.
(c) If a request does not adequately
describe the records sought, DHS may
seek additional information from the
requester. If the requester does not
respond to the request for additional
information within thirty (30) days, the
request may be administratively closed
at DHS’s discretion. This administrative
closure does not prejudice the
requester’s ability to submit a new
request for further consideration with
additional information.
§ 5.4 Responsibility for responding to
requests.
(a) In general. Except in the instances
described in paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section, the component that first
receives a request for a record and
maintains that record is the component
responsible for responding to the
request. In determining which records
are responsive to a request, a component
ordinarily will include only records in
its possession as of the date that it
begins its search. If any other date is
used, the component shall inform the
requester of that date. A record that is
excluded from the requirements of the
FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), shall
not be considered responsive to a
request.
(b) Authority to grant or deny
requests. The head of a component, or
designee, is authorized to grant or to
deny any requests for records that are
maintained by that component.
(c) Re-routing of misdirected requests.
Where a component’s FOIA office
determines that a request was
misdirected within DHS, the receiving
component’s FOIA office shall route the
request to the FOIA office of the proper
component(s).
(d) Consultations, coordination and
referrals. When a component
determines that it maintains responsive
records that either originated with
another component or agency, or which
contains information provided by, or of
substantial interest to, another
component or agency, then it shall
proceed in accordance with either
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
paragraph (d)(1), (2), or (3) of this
section, as appropriate:
(1) The component may respond to
the request, after consulting with the
component or the agency that originated
or has a substantial interest in the
records involved.
(2) The component may provide a
combined or joint response to the
request after coordinating with the other
components or agencies that originated
the record. This may include situations
where the standard referral procedure is
not appropriate where disclosure of the
identity of the component or agency to
which the referral would be made could
harm an interest protected by an
applicable exemption, such as the
exemptions that protect personal
privacy or national security interests.
For example, if a non-law enforcement
component responding to a request for
records on a living third party locates
records within its files originating with
a law enforcement agency, and if the
existence of that law enforcement
interest in the third party was not
publicly known, then to disclose that
law enforcement interest could cause an
unwarranted invasion of the personal
privacy of the third party. Similarly, if
a component locates material within its
files originating with an Intelligence
Community agency, and the
involvement of that agency in the matter
is classified and not publicly
acknowledged, then to disclose or give
attribution to the involvement of that
Intelligence Community agency could
cause national security harms. In such
instances, in order to avoid harm to an
interest protected by an applicable
exemption, the component that received
the request should coordinate with the
originating component or agency to seek
its views on the disclosability of the
record. The release determination for
the record that is the subject of the
coordination should then be conveyed
to the requester by the component that
originally received the request.
(3) The component may refer the
responsibility for responding to the
request or portion of the request to the
component or agency best able to
determine whether to disclose the
relevant records, or to the agency that
created or initially acquired the record
as long as that agency is subject to the
FOIA. Ordinarily, the component or
agency that created or initially acquired
the record will be presumed to be best
able to make the disclosure
determination. The referring component
shall document the referral and
maintain a copy of the records that it
refers.
(e) Classified information. On receipt
of any request involving classified
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
information, the component shall
determine whether information is
currently and properly classified and
take appropriate action to ensure
compliance with 6 CFR part 7.
Whenever a request involves a record
containing information that has been
classified or may be appropriate for
classification by another component or
agency under any applicable executive
order concerning the classification of
records, the receiving component shall
refer the responsibility for responding to
the request regarding that information to
the component or agency that classified
the information, or should consider the
information for classification. Whenever
a component’s record contains
information classified by another
component or agency, the component
shall coordinate with or refer the
responsibility for responding to that
portion of the request to the component
or agency that classified the underlying
information.
(f) Notice of referral. Whenever a
component refers any part of the
responsibility for responding to a
request to another component or agency,
it will notify the requester of the referral
and inform the requester of the name of
each component or agency to which the
records were referred, unless disclosure
of the identity of the component or
agency would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption,
in which case the component should
coordinate with the other component or
agency, rather than refer the records.
(g) Timing of responses to
consultations and referrals. All
consultations and referrals received by
DHS will be handled according to the
date that the FOIA request initially was
received by the first component or
agency, not any later date.
(h) Agreements regarding
consultations and referrals. Components
may establish agreements with other
components or agencies to eliminate the
need for consultations or referrals with
respect to particular types of records.
(i) Electronic records and searches—
(1) Significant interference. The FOIA
allows components to not conduct a
search for responsive documents if the
search would cause significant
interference with the operation of the
component’s automated information
system.
(2) Business as usual approach. A
‘‘business as usual’’ approach exists
when the component has the capability
to process a FOIA request for electronic
records without a significant
expenditure of monetary or personnel
resources. Components are not required
to conduct a search that does not meet
this business as usual criterion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
(i) Creating computer programs or
purchasing additional hardware to
extract email that has been archived for
emergency retrieval usually are not
considered business as usual if
extensive monetary or personnel
resources are needed to complete the
project.
(ii) Creating a computer program that
produces specific requested fields or
records contained within a well-defined
database structure usually is considered
business as usual. The time to create
this program is considered as
programmer or operator search time for
fee assessment purposes and the FOIA
requester may be assessed fees in
accordance with 6 CFR 5.11(c)(1)(iii).
However, creating a computer program
to merge files with disparate data
formats and extract specific elements
from the resultant file is not considered
business as usual, but a special service,
for which additional fees may be
imposed as specified in 6 CFR 5.11.
Components are not required to perform
special services and creation of a
computer program for a fee is up to the
discretion of the component and is
dependent on component resources and
expertise.
(3) Data links. Components are not
required to expend DHS funds to
establish data links that provide real
time or near-real-time data to a FOIA
requester.
§ 5.5
Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. Components ordinarily
will respond to requests according to
their order of receipt. Appendix I to this
subpart contains the list of components
that are designated to accept requests. In
instances involving misdirected
requests that are re-routed pursuant to 6
CFR 5.4(c), the response time will
commence on the date that the request
is received by the proper component,
but in any event not later than ten
working days after the request is first
received by any DHS component
designated in appendix I of this subpart.
(b) Multitrack processing. All
components must designate a specific
track for requests that are granted
expedited processing, in accordance
with the standards set forth in
paragraph (e) of this section. A
component may also designate
additional processing tracks that
distinguish between simple and more
complex requests based on the
estimated amount of work or time
needed to process the request. Among
the factors a component may consider
are the number of pages involved in
processing the request or the need for
consultations or referrals. Components
shall advise requesters of the track into
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45107
which their request falls, and when
appropriate, shall offer requesters an
opportunity to narrow their request so
that the request can be placed in a
different processing track.
(c) Unusual circumstances. Whenever
the statutory time limits for processing
a request cannot be met because of
‘‘unusual circumstances,’’ as defined in
the FOIA, and the component extends
the time limits on that basis, the
component shall, before expiration of
the twenty-day period to respond, notify
the requester in writing of the unusual
circumstances involved and of the date
by which processing of the request can
be expected to be completed. Where the
extension exceeds ten working days, the
component shall, as described by the
FOIA, provide the requester with an
opportunity to modify the request or
agree to an alternative time period for
processing. The component shall make
available its designated FOIA Officer
and its FOIA Public Liaison for this
purpose.
(d) Aggregating requests. For the
purposes of satisfying unusual
circumstances under the FOIA,
components may aggregate requests in
cases where it reasonably appears that
multiple requests, submitted either by a
requester or by a group of requesters
acting in concert, constitute a single
request that would otherwise involve
unusual circumstances. Components
will not aggregate multiple requests that
involve unrelated matters.
(e) Expedited processing. (1) Requests
and appeals will be processed on an
expedited basis whenever the
component determines that they
involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of
expedited processing could reasonably
be expected to pose an imminent threat
to the life or physical safety of an
individual;
(ii) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged federal
government activity, if made by a
person who is primarily engaged in
disseminating information;
(iii) The loss of substantial due
process rights; or
(iv) A matter of widespread and
exceptional media interest in which
there exist possible questions about the
government’s integrity which affect
public confidence.
(2) A request for expedited processing
may be made at any time. Requests
based on paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii), and
(iii) of this section must be submitted to
the component that maintains the
records requested. When making a
request for expedited processing of an
administrative appeal, the request
should be submitted to the DHS Office
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
45108
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of General Counsel or the component
Appeals Officer. Address information is
available at the DHS Web site, https://
www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-actfoia, or by contacting the component
FOIA officers via the information listed
in Appendix I. Requests for expedited
processing that are based on paragraph
(e)(1)(iv) of this section must be
submitted to the Senior Director of
FOIA Operations, the Privacy Office,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
245 Murray Lane SW., STOP–0655,
Washington, DC 20598–0655. A
component that receives a misdirected
request for expedited processing under
the standard set forth in paragraph
(e)(1)(iv) of this section shall forward it
immediately to the DHS Senior Director
of FOIA Operations, the Privacy Office,
for determination. The time period for
making the determination on the request
for expedited processing under
paragraph (e)(1)(iv) of this section shall
commence on the date that the Privacy
Office receives the request, provided
that it is routed within ten working
days, but in no event shall the time
period for making a determination on
the request commence any later than the
eleventh working day after the request
is received by any component
designated in appendix I of this subpart.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct,
explaining in detail the basis for making
the request for expedited processing.
For example, under paragraph (e)(1)(ii)
of this section, a requester who is not a
full-time member of the news media
must establish that he or she is a person
whose primary professional activity or
occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his
or her sole occupation. Such a requester
also must establish a particular urgency
to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the
request—one that extends beyond the
public’s right to know about government
activity generally. The existence of
numerous articles published on a given
subject can be helpful to establishing
the requirement that there be an
‘‘urgency to inform’’ the public on the
topic. As a matter of administrative
discretion, a component may waive the
formal certification requirement.
(4) A component shall notify the
requester within ten calendar days of
the receipt of a request for expedited
processing of its decision whether to
grant or deny expedited processing. If
expedited processing is granted, the
request shall be given priority, placed in
the processing track for expedited
requests, and shall be processed as soon
as practicable. If a request for expedited
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
processing is denied, any appeal of that
decision shall be acted on
expeditiously.
§ 5.6
Responses to requests.
(a) In general. Components should, to
the extent practicable, communicate
with requesters having access to the
internet using electronic means, such as
email or web portal.
(b) Acknowledgments of requests. A
component shall acknowledge the
request and assign it an individualized
tracking number if it will take longer
than ten working days to process.
Components shall include in the
acknowledgment a brief description of
the records sought to allow requesters to
more easily keep track of their requests.
(c) Grants of requests. Ordinarily, a
component shall have twenty (20)
working days from when a request is
received to determine whether to grant
or deny the request unless there are
unusual or exceptional circumstances.
Once a component makes a
determination to grant a request in full
or in part, it shall notify the requester
in writing. The component also shall
inform the requester of any fees charged
under 6 CFR 5.11 and shall disclose the
requested records to the requester
promptly upon payment of any
applicable fees.
(d) Adverse determinations of
requests. A component making an
adverse determination denying a request
in any respect shall notify the requester
of that determination in writing.
Adverse determinations, or denials of
requests, include decisions that the
requested record is exempt, in whole or
in part; the request does not reasonably
describe the records sought; the
information requested is not a record
subject to the FOIA; the requested
record does not exist, cannot be located,
or has been destroyed; or the requested
record is not readily reproducible in the
form or format sought by the requester.
Adverse determinations also include
denials involving fees, including
requester categories or fee waiver
matters, or denials of requests for
expedited processing.
(e) Content of denial. The denial shall
be signed by the head of the component,
or designee, and shall include:
(1) The name and title or position of
the person responsible for the denial;
(2) A brief statement of the reasons for
the denial, including any FOIA
exemption applied by the component in
denying the request;
(3) An estimate of the volume of any
records or information withheld, for
example, by providing the number of
pages or some other reasonable form of
estimation. This estimation is not
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
required if the volume is otherwise
indicated by deletions marked on
records that are disclosed in part, or if
providing an estimate would harm an
interest protected by an applicable
exemption; and
(4) A statement that the denial may be
appealed under 6 CFR 5.8(a), and a
description of the requirements set forth
therein.
(f) Markings on released documents.
Markings on released documents must
be clearly visible to the requester.
Records disclosed in part shall be
marked to show the amount of
information deleted and the exemption
under which the deletion was made
unless doing so would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption.
The location of the information deleted
also shall be indicated on the record, if
technically feasible.
(g) Use of record exclusions. (1) In the
event that a component identifies
records that may be subject to exclusion
from the requirements of the FOIA
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), the head of
the FOIA office of that component must
confer with Department of Justice’s
Office of Information Policy (OIP) to
obtain approval to apply the exclusion.
(2) Any component invoking an
exclusion shall maintain an
administrative record of the process of
invocation and approval of the
exclusion by OIP.
§ 5.7
Confidential commercial information.
(a) Definitions.
(1) Confidential commercial
information means commercial or
financial information obtained by DHS
from a submitter that may be protected
from disclosure under Exemption 4 of
the FOIA.
(2) Submitter means any person or
entity from whom DHS obtains
confidential commercial information,
directly or indirectly.
(b) Designation of confidential
commercial information. A submitter of
confidential commercial information
must use good faith efforts to designate
by appropriate markings, either at the
time of submission or within a
reasonable time thereafter, any portion
of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4. These designations will
expire ten years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter
requests and provides justification for a
longer designation period.
(c) When notice to submitters is
required. (1) A component shall
promptly provide written notice to a
submitter whenever records containing
such information are requested under
the FOIA if, after reviewing the request,
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the responsive records, and any appeal
by the requester, the component
determines that it may be required to
disclose the records, provided:
(i) The requested information has
been designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(ii) The component has a reason to
believe that the requested information
may be protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4.
(2) The notice shall either describe the
commercial information requested or
include a copy of the requested records
or portions of records containing the
information. In cases involving a
voluminous number of submitters,
notice may be made by posting or
publishing the notice in a place or
manner reasonably likely to accomplish
it.
(d) Exceptions to submitter notice
requirements. The notice requirements
of paragraphs (c) and (g) of this section
shall not apply if:
(1) The component determines that
the information is exempt under the
FOIA;
(2) The information lawfully has been
published or has been officially made
available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by a statute other than the
FOIA or by a regulation issued in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 12600 of June 23, 1987;
or
(4) The designation made by the
submitter under paragraph (b) of this
section appears obviously frivolous,
except that, in such a case, the
component shall give the submitter
written notice of any final decision to
disclose the information and must
provide that notice within a reasonable
number of days prior to a specified
disclosure date.
(e) Opportunity to object to disclosure.
(1) A component will specify a
reasonable time period within which
the submitter must respond to the notice
referenced above. If a submitter has any
objections to disclosure, it should
provide the component a detailed
written statement that specifies all
grounds for withholding the particular
information under any exemption of the
FOIA. In order to rely on Exemption 4
as basis for nondisclosure, the submitter
must explain why the information
constitutes a trade secret, or commercial
or financial information that is
privileged or confidential.
(2) A submitter who fails to respond
within the time period specified in the
notice shall be considered to have no
objection to disclosure of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
information. Information received by
the component after the date of any
disclosure decision will not be
considered by the component. Any
information provided by a submitter
under this subpart may itself be subject
to disclosure under the FOIA.
(f) Analysis of objections. A
component shall consider a submitter’s
objections and specific grounds for
nondisclosure in deciding whether to
disclose the requested information.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose.
Whenever a component decides to
disclose information over the objection
of a submitter, the component shall
provide the submitter written notice,
which shall include:
(1) A statement of the reasons why
each of the submitter’s disclosure
objections was not sustained;
(2) A description of the information to
be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which
shall be a reasonable time subsequent to
the notice.
(h) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever
a requester files a lawsuit seeking to
compel the disclosure of confidential
commercial information, the component
shall promptly notify the submitter.
(i) Requester notification. The
component shall notify a requester
whenever it provides the submitter with
notice and an opportunity to object to
disclosure; whenever it notifies the
submitter of its intent to disclose the
requested information; and whenever a
submitter files a lawsuit to prevent the
disclosure of the information.
(j) Scope. This section shall not apply
to any confidential commercial
information provided to CBP by a
business submitter. 6 CFR 5.12 applies
to such information. 6 CFR 5.12 also
defines ‘‘confidential commercial
information’’ as used in this paragraph.
§ 5.8
Administrative appeals
(a) Requirements for filing an appeal.
(1) A requester may appeal adverse
determinations denying his or her
request or any part of the request to the
appropriate Appeals Officer. A requester
may also appeal if he or she questions
the adequacy of the component’s search
for responsive records, or believes the
component either misinterpreted the
request or did not address all aspects of
the request (i.e., it issued an incomplete
response), or if the requester believes
there is a procedural deficiency (e.g.,
fees were improperly calculated). For
the address of the appropriate
component Appeals Officer, contact the
applicable component FOIA liaison
using the information in appendix I to
this subpart, visit www.dhs.gov/foia, or
call 1–866–431–0486. An appeal must
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45109
be in writing, and to be considered
timely it must be postmarked or, in the
case of electronic submissions,
transmitted to the Appeals Officer
within 60 business days after the date of
the component’s response. The appeal
should clearly identify the component
determination (including the assigned
request number if the requester knows
it) that is being appealed and should
contain the reasons the requester
believes the determination was
erroneous. To facilitate handling, the
requester should mark both the letter
and the envelope, or the transmittal line
in the case of electronic transmissions
‘‘Freedom of Information Act Appeal.’’
(2) An adverse determination by the
component appeals officer will be the
final action of DHS.
(b) Adjudication of appeals. (1) The
DHS Office of the General Counsel or its
designee (e.g., component Appeals
Officers) is the authorized appeals
authority for DHS;
(2) On receipt of any appeal involving
classified information, the Appeals
Officer shall consult with the Chief
Security Officer, and take appropriate
action to ensure compliance with 6 CFR
part 7;
(3) If the appeal becomes the subject
of a lawsuit, the Appeals Officer is not
required to act further on the appeal.
(c) Appeal decisions. The decision on
the appeal will be made in writing. A
decision that upholds a component’s
determination will contain a statement
that identifies the reasons for the
affirmance, including any FOIA
exemptions applied. The decision will
provide the requester with notification
of the statutory right to file a lawsuit
and will inform the requester of the
mediation services offered by the Office
of Government Information Services, of
the National Archives and Records
Administration, as a non-exclusive
alternative to litigation. If the adverse
decision is reversed or modified on
appeal, in whole or in part, the
requester will be notified in a written
decision and the request will be
thereafter be further processed in
accordance with that appeal decision.
(d) Time limit for issuing appeal
decision. The statutory time limit for
responding to appeals is generally 20
workdays after receipt. However, the
Appeals Officer may extend the time
limit for responding to an appeal
provided the circumstances set forth in
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(i) are met.
(e) Appeal necessary before seeking
court review. If a requester wishes to
seek court review of a component’s
adverse determination on a matter
appealable under subsection (a)(1) of
this section, the requester must
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
45110
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
generally first appeal it under this
subpart. However, a requester is not
required to first file an appeal of an
adverse determination of a request for
expedited processing prior to seeking
court review.
§ 5.9
Preservation of records.
Each component shall preserve all
correspondence pertaining to the
requests that it receives under this
subpart, as well as copies of all
requested records, until disposition or
destruction is authorized pursuant to
title 44 of the United States Code or the
General Records Schedule 4.2 and/or 14
of the National Archives and Records
Administration. Records will not be
disposed of or destroyed while they are
the subject of a pending request, appeal,
or lawsuit under the FOIA.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 5.10 FOIA requests for information
contained in a Privacy Act system of
records.
(a) Information subject to Privacy Act.
(1) If a requester submits a FOIA request
for information about him or herself that
is contained in a Privacy Act system of
records applicable to the requester (i.e.,
the information contained in the system
of records is retrieved by the component
using the requester’s name or other
personal identifier, and the information
pertains to an individual covered by the
Privacy Act) the request will be
processed under both the FOIA and the
Privacy Act.
(2) If the information the requester is
seeking is not subject to the Privacy Act
(e.g., the information is filed under
another subject, such as an organization,
activity, event, or an investigation not
retrievable by the requester’s name or
personal identifier), the request, if
otherwise properly made, will be treated
only as a FOIA request. In addition, if
the information is covered by the
Privacy Act and the requester does not
provide proper verification of the
requester’s identity, the request, if
otherwise properly made, will be
processed only under the FOIA.
(b) When both Privacy Act and FOIA
exemptions apply. Only if both a
Privacy Act exemption and a FOIA
exemption apply can DHS withhold
information from a requester if the
information sought by the requester is
about him or herself and is contained in
a Privacy Act system of records
applicable to the requester.
(c) Conditions for release of Privacy
Act information to third parties in
response to a FOIA request. If a
requester submits a FOIA request for
Privacy Act information about another
individual, the information will not be
disclosed without that person’s prior
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
written consent that provides the same
verification information that the person
would have been required to submit for
information about him or herself,
unless—
(1) The information is required to be
released under the FOIA, as provided by
5 U.S.C. 552a (b)(2); or
(2) In most circumstances, if the
individual is deceased.
(d) Privacy Act requirements. See
DHS’s Privacy Act regulations in 5 CFR
part 5, subpart B for additional
information regarding the requirements
of the Privacy Act.
§ 5.11
Fees.
(a) In general. Components shall
charge for processing requests under the
FOIA in accordance with the provisions
of this section and with the OMB
Guidelines. Components will ordinarily
use the most efficient and least
expensive method for processing
requested records. In order to resolve
any fee issues that arise under this
section, a component may contact a
requester for additional information. A
component ordinarily will collect all
applicable fees before sending copies of
records to a requester. If you make a
FOIA request, it shall be considered a
firm commitment by you to pay all
applicable fees charged under § 5.11, up
to $25.00, unless you seek a waiver of
fees. Requesters must pay fees by check
or money order made payable to the
Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. Generally, ‘‘requester
category’’ means one of the three
categories in which agencies place
requesters for the purpose of
determining whether a requester will be
charged fees for search, review and
duplication; categories include
commercial requesters, noncommercial
scientific or educational institutions or
news media requesters, and all other
requesters. The term ‘‘fee waiver’’
means that processing fees will be
waived, or reduced, if a requester can
demonstrate that certain statutory
standards are satisfied including that
the information is in the public interest
and is not requested for a commercial
interest. For purposes of this section:
(1) Commercial use request is a
request that asks for information for a
use or a purpose that furthers a
commercial, trade, or profit interest,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. A
component’s decision to place a
requester in the commercial use
category will be made on a case-by-case
basis based on the requester’s intended
use of the information.
(2) Direct costs are those expenses that
an agency expends in searching for and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing)
records in order to respond to a FOIA
request. For example, direct costs
include the salary of the employee
performing the work (i.e., the basic rate
of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent
of that rate to cover benefits) and the
cost of operating computers and other
electronic equipment, such as
photocopiers and scanners. Direct costs
do not include overhead expenses such
as the costs of space, and of heating or
lighting a facility.
(3) Duplication is reproducing a copy
of a record or of the information
contained in it, necessary to respond to
a FOIA request. Copies can take the
form of paper, audiovisual materials, or
electronic records, among others.
(4) Educational institution is any
school that operates a program of
scholarly research. A requester in this
fee category must show that the request
is authorized by, and is made under the
auspices of, an educational institution
and that the records are not sought for
a commercial use, but rather are sought
to further scholarly research. To fall
within this fee category the request must
serve the scholarly research goal of the
institution rather than an individual
research goal.
Example 1. A request from a professor
of geology at a university for records
relating to soil erosion, written on
letterhead of the Department of Geology,
would be presumed to be from an
educational institution if the request
adequately describes how the requested
information would further a specific
research goal of the educational
institution.
Example 2. A request from the same
professor of geology seeking
immigration information from the U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
in furtherance of a murder mystery he
is writing would not be presumed to be
an institutional request, regardless of
whether it was written on institutional
stationery.
Example 3. A student who makes a
request in furtherance of the completion
of a course of instruction would be
presumed to be carrying out an
individual research goal, rather than a
scholarly research goal of the
institution, and would not qualify as
part of this fee category.
Note: These examples are provided for
guidance purposes only. Each individual
request will be evaluated under the particular
facts, circumstances, and information
provided by the requester.
(5) Noncommercial scientific
institution is an institution that is not
operated on a ‘‘commercial’’ basis, as
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, and that is operated solely for
the purpose of conducting scientific
research the results of which are not
intended to promote any particular
product or industry. A requester in this
category must show that the request is
authorized by and is made under the
auspices of a qualifying institution and
that the records are sought to further
scientific research and not for a
commercial use.
(6) Representative of the news media
is any person or entity organized and
operated to publish or broadcast news to
the public that actively gathers
information of potential interest to a
segment of the public, uses its editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work
to an audience. The term ‘‘news’’ means
information that is about current events
or that would be of current interest to
the public. Examples of news media
entities include television or radio
stations that broadcast ‘‘news’’ to the
public at large and publishers of
periodicals that disseminate ‘‘news’’
and make their products available
through a variety of means to the
general public, including but not
limited to, news organizations that
disseminate solely on the Internet. A
request for records that supports the
news-dissemination function of the
requester shall not be considered to be
for a commercial use. In contrast, data
brokers or others who merely compile
and market government information for
direct economic return shall not be
presumed to be news media entities.
‘‘Freelance’’ journalists must
demonstrate a solid basis for expecting
publication through a news media entity
in order to be considered as working for
a news media entity. A publication
contract would provide the clearest
evidence that publication is expected;
however, components shall also
consider a requester’s past publication
record in making this determination.
(7) Review is the page-by-page, lineby-line examination of a record located
in response to a request in order to
determine whether any portion of it is
exempt from disclosure. Review time
includes processing any record for
disclosure, such as doing all that is
necessary to prepare the record for
disclosure, including the process of
redacting the record and marking the
appropriate exemptions. Review costs
are properly charged even if a record
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time
also includes time spent both obtaining
and considering any formal objection to
disclosure made by a confidential
commercial information submitter
under 6 CFR 5.7 or 6 CFR 5.12, but it
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
does not include time spent resolving
general legal or policy issues regarding
the application of exemptions.
(8) Search is the process of looking for
and retrieving records or information
responsive to a request. Search time
includes page-by-page or line-by-line
identification of information within
records; and the reasonable efforts
expended to locate and retrieve
information from electronic records.
Components shall ensure that searches
are done in the most efficient and least
expensive manner reasonably possible
by readily available means.
(c) Charging fees. In responding to
FOIA requests, components shall charge
the following fees unless a waiver or
reduction of fees has been granted under
paragraph (k) of this section. Because
the fee amounts provided below already
account for the direct costs associated
with a given fee type, unless otherwise
stated in § 5.11, components should not
add any additional costs to those
charges.
(1) Search. (i) Search fees shall be
charged for all requests subject to the
restrictions of paragraph (d) of this
section. Components may properly
charge for time spent searching even if
they do not locate any responsive
records or if they determine that the
records are entirely exempt from
disclosure.
(ii) For each quarter hour spent by
personnel searching for requested
records, including electronic searches
that do not require new programming,
the fees will be as follows: Managerial—
$10.25; professional—$7.00; and
clerical/administrative—$4.00.
(iii) Requesters will be charged the
direct costs associated with conducting
any search that requires the creation of
a new computer program, as referenced
in section 5.4, to locate the requested
records. Requesters shall be notified of
the costs associated with creating such
a program and must agree to pay the
associated costs before the costs may be
incurred.
(iv) For requests that require the
retrieval of records stored by an agency
at a federal records center operated by
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA), additional
costs shall be charged in accordance
with the Transactional Billing Rate
Schedule established by NARA.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will
be charged to all requesters, subject to
the restrictions of paragraph (d) of this
section. A component shall honor a
requester’s preference for receiving a
record in a particular form or format
where it is readily reproducible by the
component in the form or format
requested. Where photocopies are
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45111
supplied, the component will provide
one copy per request at a cost of ten
cents per page. For copies of records
produced on tapes, disks, or other
media, components will charge the
direct costs of producing the copy,
including operator time. Where paper
documents must be scanned in order to
comply with a requester’s preference to
receive the records in an electronic
format, the requester shall pay the direct
costs associated with scanning those
materials. For other forms of
duplication, components will charge the
direct costs.
(3) Review. Review fees will be
charged to requesters who make
commercial use requests. Review fees
will be assessed in connection with the
initial review of the record, i.e., the
review conducted by a component to
determine whether an exemption
applies to a particular record or portion
of a record. No charge will be made for
review at the administrative appeal
stage of exemptions applied at the
initial review stage. However, when the
appellate authority determines that a
particular exemption no longer applies,
any costs associated with a component’s
re-review of the records in order to
consider the use of other exemptions
may be assessed as review fees. Review
fees will be charged at the same rates as
those charged for a search under
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section.
(d) Restrictions on charging fees. (1)
No search fees will be charged for
requests by educational institutions
(unless the records are sought for a
commercial use), noncommercial
scientific institutions, or representatives
of the news media.
(2) If a component fails to comply
with the time limits in which to respond
to a request, and if no unusual or
exceptional circumstances, as those
terms are defined by the FOIA, apply to
the processing of the request, it may not
charge search fees, or, in the instances
of requests from requesters described in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, may not
charge duplication fees.
(3) No search or review fees will be
charged for a quarter-hour period unless
more than half of that period is required
for search or review.
(4) Except for requesters seeking
records for a commercial use,
components will provide without
charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication
(or the cost equivalent for other media);
and
(ii) The first two hours of search.
(5) When, after first deducting the 100
free pages (or its cost equivalent) and
the first two hours of search, a total fee
calculated under paragraph (c) of this
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
45112
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
section is $14.00 or less for any request,
no fee will be charged.
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess
of $25.00. (1) When a component
determines or estimates that the fees to
be assessed in accordance with this
section will exceed $25.00, the
component shall notify the requester of
the actual or estimated amount of the
fees, including a breakdown of the fees
for search, review and/or duplication,
unless the requester has indicated a
willingness to pay fees as high as those
anticipated. If only a portion of the fee
can be estimated readily, the component
shall advise the requester accordingly. If
the requester is a noncommercial use
requester, the notice will specify that
the requester is entitled to his or her
statutory entitlements of 100 pages of
duplication at no charge and, if the
requester is charged search fees, two
hours of search time at no charge, and
will advise the requester whether those
entitlements have been provided.
(2) In cases in which a requester has
been notified that the actual or
estimated fees are in excess of $25.00,
the request shall not be considered
perfected and further work will not be
completed until the requester commits
in writing to pay the actual or estimated
total fee, or designates some amount of
fees he or she is willing to pay, or in the
case of a noncommercial use requester
who has not yet been provided with his
or her statutory entitlements, designates
that he or she seeks only that which can
be provided by the statutory
entitlements. The requester must
provide the commitment or designation
in writing, and must, when applicable,
designate an exact dollar amount the
requester is willing to pay. Components
are not required to accept payments in
installments.
(3) If the requester has indicated a
willingness to pay some designated
amount of fees, but the component
estimates that the total fee will exceed
that amount, the component will toll the
processing of the request while it
notifies the requester of the estimated
fees in excess of the amount the
requester has indicated a willingness to
pay. The component shall inquire
whether the requester wishes to revise
the amount of fees he or she is willing
to pay and/or modify the request. Once
the requester responds, the time to
respond will resume from where it was
at the date of the notification.
(4) Components will make available
their FOIA Public Liaison or other FOIA
professional to assist any requester in
reformulating a request to meet the
requester’s needs at a lower cost.
(f) Charges for other services.
Although not required to provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
special services, if a component chooses
to do so as a matter of administrative
discretion, the direct costs of providing
the service will be charged. Examples of
such services include certifying that
records are true copies, providing
multiple copies of the same document,
or sending records by means other than
first class mail.
(g) Charging interest. Components
may charge interest on any unpaid bill
starting on the 31st day following the
date of billing the requester. Interest
charges will be assessed at the rate
provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and will
accrue from the billing date until
payment is received by the component.
Components will follow the provisions
of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub.
L. 97–365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended,
and its administrative procedures,
including the use of consumer reporting
agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. When a
component reasonably believes that a
requester or a group of requesters acting
in concert is attempting to divide a
single request into a series of requests
for the purpose of avoiding fees, the
component may aggregate those requests
and charge accordingly. Components
may presume that multiple requests of
this type made within a 30-day period
have been made in order to avoid fees.
For requests separated by a longer
period, components will aggregate them
only where there is a reasonable basis
for determining that aggregation is
warranted in view of all the
circumstances involved. Multiple
requests involving unrelated matters
will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For
requests other than those described in
paragraphs (i)(2) and (3) of this section,
a component shall not require the
requester to make an advance payment
before work is commenced or continued
on a request. Payment owed for work
already completed (i.e., payment before
copies are sent to a requester) is not an
advance payment.
(2) When a component determines or
estimates that a total fee to be charged
under this section will exceed $250.00,
it may require that the requester make
an advance payment up to the amount
of the entire anticipated fee before
beginning to process the request. A
component may elect to process the
request prior to collecting fees when it
receives a satisfactory assurance of full
payment from a requester with a history
of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously
failed to pay a properly charged FOIA
fee to any component or agency within
30 calendar days of the billing date, a
component may require that the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requester pay the full amount due, plus
any applicable interest on that prior
request and the component may require
that the requester make an advance
payment of the full amount of any
anticipated fee, before the component
begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request
or any pending appeal. Where a
component has a reasonable basis to
believe that a requester has
misrepresented his or her identity in
order to avoid paying outstanding fees,
it may require that the requester provide
proof of identity.
(4) In cases in which a component
requires advance payment, the request
shall not be considered received and
further work will not be completed until
the required payment is received. If the
requester does not pay the advance
payment within 30 calendar days after
the date of the component’s fee
determination, the request will be
closed.
(j) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any statute that
specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of
records. In instances where records
responsive to a request are subject to a
statutorily-based fee schedule program,
the component will inform the requester
of the contact information for that
source.
(k) Requirements for waiver or
reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive
to a request shall be furnished without
charge or at a reduced rate below that
established under paragraph (c) of this
section, where a component determines,
on a case-by-case basis, based on all
available information, that the requester
has demonstrated that:
(i) Disclosure of the requested
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government; and
(ii) Disclosure of the information is
not primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester.
(2) In deciding whether disclosure of
the requested information is in the
public interest because it is likely to
contribute significantly to public
understanding of operations or activities
of the government, components will
consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request must
concern identifiable operations or
activities of the federal government,
with a connection that is direct and
clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) Disclosure of the requested
records must be meaningfully
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
informative about government
operations or activities in order to be
‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an increased
public understanding of those
operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the
public domain, in either the same or a
substantially identical form, would not
contribute to such understanding where
nothing new would be added to the
public’s understanding.
(iii) The disclosure must contribute to
the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the
subject, as opposed to the individual
understanding of the requester. A
requester’s expertise in the subject area
as well as his or her ability and
intention to effectively convey
information to the public shall be
considered. It shall be presumed that a
representative of the news media will
satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The public’s understanding of the
subject in question must be enhanced by
the disclosure to a significant extent.
However, components shall not make
value judgments about whether the
information at issue is ‘‘important’’
enough to be made public.
(3) To determine whether disclosure
of the requested information is
primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester, components will consider
the following factors:
(i) Components shall identify any
commercial interest of the requester, as
defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. Requesters shall
be given an opportunity to provide
explanatory information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) A waiver or reduction of fees is
justified where the public interest is
greater than any identified commercial
interest in disclosure. Components
ordinarily shall presume that where a
news media requester has satisfied the
public interest standard, the public
interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester.
Disclosure to data brokers or others who
merely compile and market government
information for direct economic return
shall not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(4) Where only some of the records to
be released satisfy the requirements for
a waiver of fees, a waiver shall be
granted for those records.
(5) Requests for a waiver or reduction
of fees should be made when the request
is first submitted to the component and
should address the criteria referenced
above. A requester may submit a fee
waiver request at a later time so long as
the underlying record request is
pending or on administrative appeal.
When a requester who has committed to
pay fees subsequently asks for a waiver
of those fees and that waiver is denied,
the requester will be required to pay any
costs incurred up to the date the fee
waiver request was received.
(6) Summary of fees. The following
table summarizes the chargeable fees
(excluding direct fees identified in
§ 5.11) for each requester category.
Category
Search fees
Review fees
Commercial-use ................................................................
Educational or Non-Commercial Scientific Institution ......
News Media ......................................................................
Other requesters ...............................................................
Yes ......................................
No ........................................
No ........................................
Yes (2 hours free) ...............
Yes ......................................
No ........................................
No ........................................
No ........................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 5.12 Confidential commercial
information; CBP procedures.
(a) In general. For purposes of this
section, ‘‘commercial information’’ is
defined as trade secret, commercial, or
financial information obtained from a
person. Commercial information
provided to CBP by a business submitter
and that CBP determines is privileged or
confidential commercial or financial
information will be treated as privileged
or confidential and will not be disclosed
pursuant to a Freedom of Information
Act request or otherwise made known in
any manner except as provided in this
section.
(b) Notice to business submitters of
FOIA requests for disclosure. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, CBP will provide business
submitters with prompt written notice
of receipt of FOIA requests or appeals
that encompass their commercial
information. The written notice will
describe either the exact nature of the
commercial information requested, or
enclose copies of the records or those
portions of the records that contain the
commercial information. The written
notice also will advise the business
submitter of its right to file a disclosure
objection statement as provided under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. CBP will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
provide notice to business submitters of
FOIA requests for the business
submitter’s commercial information for
a period of not more than 10 years after
the date the business submitter provides
CBP with the information, unless the
business submitter requests, and
provides acceptable justification for, a
specific notice period of greater
duration.
(1) When notice is required. CBP will
provide business submitters with notice
of receipt of a FOIA request or appeal
whenever:
(i) The business submitter has in good
faith designated the information as
commercially- or financially-sensitive
information. The business submitter’s
claim of confidentiality should be
supported by a statement by an
authorized representative of the
business entity providing specific
justification that the information in
question is considered confidential
commercial or financial information and
that the information has not been
disclosed to the public; or
(ii) CBP has reason to believe that
disclosure of the commercial
information could reasonably be
expected to cause substantial
competitive harm.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45113
Duplication fees
Yes.
Yes (100 pages free).
Yes (100 pages free).
Yes (100 pages free).
(2) When notice is not required. The
notice requirements of this section will
not apply if:
(i) CBP determines that the
commercial information will not be
disclosed;
(ii) The commercial information has
been lawfully published or otherwise
made available to the public; or
(iii) Disclosure of the information is
required by law (other than 5 U.S.C.
552).
(c) Procedure when notice given. (1)
Opportunity for business submitter to
object to disclosure. A business
submitter receiving written notice from
CBP of receipt of a FOIA request or
appeal encompassing its commercial
information may object to any
disclosure of the commercial
information by providing CBP with a
detailed statement of reasons within 10
days of the date of the notice (exclusive
of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public
holidays). The statement should specify
all the grounds for withholding any of
the commercial information under any
exemption of the FOIA and, in the case
of Exemption 4, should demonstrate
why the information is considered to be
a trade secret or commercial or financial
information that is privileged or
confidential. The disclosure objection
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
45114
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
information provided by a person
pursuant to this paragraph may be
subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(2) Notice to FOIA requester. When
notice is given to a business submitter
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
notice will also be given to the FOIA
requester that the business submitter
has been given an opportunity to object
to any disclosure of the requested
commercial information.
(d) Notice of intent to disclose. CBP
will consider carefully a business
submitter’s objections and specific
grounds for nondisclosure prior to
determining whether to disclose
commercial information. Whenever CBP
decides to disclose the requested
commercial information over the
objection of the business submitter, CBP
will provide written notice to the
business submitter of CBP’s intent to
disclose, which will include:
(1) A statement of the reasons for
which the business submitter’s
disclosure objections were not
sustained;
(2) A description of the commercial
information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date which
will not be less than 10 days (exclusive
of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public
holidays) after the notice of intent to
disclose the requested information has
been issued to the business submitter.
Except as otherwise prohibited by law,
CBP will also provide a copy of the
notice of intent to disclose to the FOIA
requester at the same time.
(e) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever
a FOIA requester brings suit seeking to
compel the disclosure of commercial
information covered by paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, CBP will promptly notify
the business submitter in writing.
§ 5.13
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this subpart shall be
construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any record to which such person is
not entitled under the FOIA.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Appendix I to Subpart A—FOIA
Contact Information
Department of Homeland Security Chief
FOIA Officer
Chief Privacy Officer/Chief FOIA Officer,
The Privacy Office, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW.,
STOP–0655, Washington, DC 20528–0655.
Department of Homeland Security Deputy
Chief FOIA Officer
Deputy Chief FOIA Officer, The Privacy
Office, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., STOP–0655,
Washington, DC 20528–0655.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Senior Director, FOIA Operations
Sr. Director, FOIA Operations, The Privacy
Office, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., STOP–0655,
Washington, DC 20528–0655, Phone: 202–
343–1743 or 866–431–0486, Fax: 202–343–
4011, Email: foia@hq.dhs.gov.
Director, FOIA Production and Quality
Assurance
Public Liaison, FOIA Production and
Quality Assurance, The Privacy Office, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, 245
Murray Lane SW., STOP–0655, Washington,
DC 20528–0655, Phone: 202–343–1743 or
866–431–0486, Fax: 202–343–4011, Email:
foia@hq.dhs.gov.
U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, 90 K Street
NE., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–1181,
Phone: 202–325–0150, Fax: 202–325–0230.
Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
(CRCL)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202–357–
1218, Email: CRCL@dhs.gov.
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, 500 C Street
SW., Room 7NE, Washington, DC 20472,
Phone: 202–646–3323, Email: femafoia@dhs.gov.
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
(FLETC)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, Building
#681, Suite 187B, Glynco, GA 31524, Phone:
912–267–3103, Fax: 912–267–3113, Email:
fletc-foia@dhs.gov.
National Protection and Programs
Directorate (NPPD)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 703–235–
2211, Fax: 703–235–2052, Email:
NPPD.FOIA@dhs.gov.
Office of Biometric Identity Management
(OBIM) FOIA Officer
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20598–0628, Phone: 202–
298–5454, Fax: 202–298–5445, E-Mail:
OBIM–FOIA@ice.dhs.gov.
Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202–447–
4883, Fax: 202–612–1936, Email:
I&AFOIA@hq.dhs.gov.
Office of Inspector General (OIG)
FOIA Public Liaison, DHS–OIG Counsel,
STOP 0305, 245 Murray Lane SW.,
Washington, DC 20528–0305, Phone: 202–
254–4001, Fax: 202–254–4398, Email:
FOIA.OIG@oig.dhs.gov.
Office of Operations Coordination and
Planning (OPS)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202–447–
4156, Fax: 202–282–9811, Email:
FOIAOPS@DHS.GOV.
Science & Technology Directorate (S&T)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202–254–
6342, Fax: 202–254–6739, Email:
stfoia@hq.dhs.gov.
Transportation Security Administration
(TSA)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, Freedom of
Information Act Branch, 601 S. 12th Street,
11th Floor, East Tower, TSA–20, Arlington,
VA 20598–6020, Phone: 1–866–FOIA–TSA or
571–227–2300, Fax: 571–227–1406, Email:
foia.tsa@dhs.gov.
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
(USCIS)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, National
Records Center, FOIA/PA Office, P.O. Box
648010, Lee’s Summit, MO 64064–8010,
Phone: 1–800–375–5283 (USCIS National
Customer Service Unit), Fax: 816–350–5785,
Email: uscis.foia@uscis.dhs.gov.
United States Coast Guard (USCG)
Commandant (CG–611), 2100 2nd St. SW.,
Attn: FOIA Officer/Public Liaison,
Washington, DC 20593–0001, FOIA
Requester Service Center Contact: Amanda
Ackerson, Phone: 202–475–3522, Fax: 202–
475–3927, Email: efoia@uscg.mil.
United States Immigration & Customs
Enforcement (ICE)
Freedom of Information Act Office, FOIA
Officer/Public Liaison, 500 12th Street SW.,
Stop 5009, Washington, DC 20536–5009.
FOIA Requester Service Center Contact,
Phone: 866–633–1182, Fax: 202–732–4265,
Email: ice-foia@dhs.gov.
United States Secret Service (USSS)
Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts
Branch, FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, 245
Murray Drive, Building 410, Washington, DC
20223, Phone: 202–406–6370, Fax: 202–406–
5586, Email: FOIA@usss.dhs.gov.
Please direct all requests for information
from the Office of the Secretary, Citizenship
and Immigration Services Ombudsman,
Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Office of
the Executive Secretary, Office of
Intergovernmental Affairs, Management
Directorate, Office of Policy, Office of the
General Counsel, Office of Health Affairs,
Office of Legislative Affairs, Office of Public
Affairs and the Privacy Office, to the DHS
Privacy Office at: The Privacy Office, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, 245
Murray Lane SW., STOP–0655, Washington,
DC 20528–0655, Phone: 202–343–1743 or
866–431–0486, Fax: 202–343–4011, Email:
foia@hq.dhs.gov.
Appendix B to Part 5—[Removed]
■
3. Remove appendix B to part 5.
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Title 19—Customs Duties
PART 103—AVAILABILITY OF
INFORMATION
4. The authority citation for part 103
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 19
U.S.C. 66, 1624; 31 U.S.C. 9701.
Section 103.31 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
1431; Section 103.31a also issued under 19
U.S.C. 2071 note and 6 U.S.C. 943; Section
103.33 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1628;
Section 103.34 also issued under 18 U.S.C.
1905.
§ 103.35
■
[Removed]
5. Remove § 103.35.
Title 44—Emergency Management and
Assistance
PART 5—PRODUCTION OR
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
6. The authority citation for part 5 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subparts A Through E—[Removed and
Reserved]
7. Remove and reserve subparts A
through E of part 5.
■ 8. In § 5.86, revise the section to read
as follows:
■
§ 5.86 Records involved in litigation or
other judicial process.
Subpoenas duces tecum issued
pursuant to litigation or any other
adjudicatory proceeding in which the
United States is a party shall be referred
to the Chief Counsel.
Jeh Charles Johnson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–18388 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9L–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
11 CFR Parts 102, 104, 110
[Notice 2015–10]
Rulemaking Petition: Contributions
From Corporations and Other
Organizations to Political Committees
Federal Election Commission.
Rulemaking petition; notice of
availability.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On May 14, 2015, the Federal
Election Commission received a Petition
for Rulemaking that asks the
Commission to revise existing rules
concerning the reporting of
contributions to political committees
from corporations and other
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
organizations. The Commission seeks
comments on this petition.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before October 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: All comments must be in
writing. Commenters are encouraged to
submit comments electronically via the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.fec.gov/fosers, reference REG
2015–03, or by email to
ContributionPetition2015@fec.gov.
Alternatively, commenters may submit
comments in paper form, addressed to
the Federal Election Commission, Attn.:
Robert M. Knop, Assistant General
Counsel, 999 E Street NW., Washington,
DC 20463.
Each commenter must provide, at a
minimum, his or her first name, last
name, city, state, and zip code. All
properly submitted comments,
including attachments, will become part
of the public record, and the
Commission will make comments
available for public viewing on the
Commission’s Web site and in the
Commission’s Public Records room.
Accordingly, commenters should not
provide in their comments any
information that they do not wish to
make public, such as a home street
address, personal email address, date of
birth, phone number, social security
number, or driver’s license number, or
any information that is restricted from
disclosure, such as trade secrets or
commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert M. Knop, Assistant General
Counsel, or Mr. Sean J. Wright,
Attorney, Office of General Counsel, 999
E Street NW., Washington, DC 20463,
(202) 694–1650 or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
14, 2015, the Federal Election
Commission received a Petition for
Rulemaking from Make Your Laws PAC,
Inc. and Make Your Laws Advocacy,
Inc. The petition asks the Commission
to modify its regulations requiring
disclosure of contributions from
corporations and other organizations to
political committees.
The Federal Election Campaign Act,
52 U.S.C. 30101–46 (the ‘‘Act’’), and
Commission regulations require all
political committees to abide by certain
organizational, record-keeping, and
reporting requirements. See 52 U.S.C.
30102, 30103, 30104; 11 CFR 102.1,
102.2, 102.7, 104.3. This includes
maintaining records of contribution
receipts and disbursements, reporting
independent expenditures, and filing
periodic disclosure reports that identify
the source of each contribution
exceeding $200. See 11 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
45115
104.3(a)(4)(i), 104.4, 104.5(c).
Commission regulations also require
every person who makes electioneering
communications aggregating in excess
of $10,000 in a calendar year and every
person (other than a political
committee) that makes independent
expenditures in excess of $250 with
respect to a given election in a calendar
year to report certain information to the
Commission. 11 CFR 104.20(b) and (c),
109.10(b) and (e); 52 U.S.C. 30104(c)(1)
and (2), (f).
The petition asks the Commission to
establish a new rule requiring that ‘‘any
person, other than a natural person,
contributing an aggregate of more than
$1,000 in any calendar year to any
political committee, whether directly or
indirectly’’ (emphasis omitted), must do
so from an account subject to certain
reporting requirements. Specifically, the
petition asks the Commission to require
that these accounts disclose ‘‘the
original source of all election-related
contributions and expenditures,
traceable through all intermediary
entities to a natural person, regardless of
the amounts or entities involved’’
(emphasis omitted). The petition also
asks the Commission to apply to these
accounts the identification requirements
of 11 CFR 100.12; the Act’s prohibition
on foreign national contributions, 52
U.S.C. 30121; allocation rules for
administrative expenses; and, in some
circumstances, the Act’s limitations on
contributions to political committees.
The Commission seeks comments on
the petition. The public may inspect the
petition on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.fec.gov/fosers, or in the
Commission’s Public Records Office,
999 E Street NW., Washington, DC
20463, Monday through Friday, from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. Interested persons may
also obtain a copy of the petition by
dialing the Commission’s Faxline
service at (202) 501–3413 and following
its instructions. Request document
#279.
The Commission will not consider the
petition’s merits until after the comment
period closes. If the Commission
decides that the petition has merit, it
may begin a rulemaking proceeding.
The Commission will announce any
action that it takes in the Federal
Register.
On behalf of the Commission,
Dated: July 16, 2015.
Ann M. Ravel,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–18495 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45101-45115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18388]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 45101]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 103
Federal Emergency Management Agency
44 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2009-0036]
RIN 1601-AA00
Freedom of Information Act Regulations
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to amend the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) regulations under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). The Department (DHS) is proposing to update and streamline the
language of several procedural provisions, and to incorporate changes
brought about by the amendments to the FOIA under the OPEN Government
Act of 2007, among other changes. DHS invites comment on all aspects of
this proposal.
DATES: Comments and related material must be submitted to the docket
for this rulemaking, DHS-2009-0036, on or before September 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2009-0036, by one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-343-4011.
(3) Mail: By mail to the Department of Homeland Security, Office of
the Chief Privacy Officer, ATTN: James Holzer, 245 Murray Lane SW.,
STOP-0655, Washington, DC 20528-0655.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change and may be read at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Holzer, Senior Director, FOIA
Operations, Office of the Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland
Security, at 1-866-431-0486.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Secretary of Homeland Security has authority under 5 U.S.C.
301, 552, and 552a, and 6 U.S.C. 112(e), to issue FOIA and Privacy Act
regulations. On January 27, 2003, the Department of Homeland Security
(Department or DHS) published an interim rule in the Federal Register
(68 FR 4056) that established DHS procedures for obtaining agency
records under the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552, or Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
DHS solicited comments on this interim rule, but received none.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This rule proposes revisions to DHS's FOIA regulations, but
not its Privacy Act regulations. DHS intends to finalize its Privacy
Act regulations by separate rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2005, Executive Order 13392 called for the designation of a
Chief FOIA Officer and FOIA Public Liaisons, along with the
establishment of FOIA Requester Service Centers as appropriate.
Subsequently, the Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National
Government Act of 2007 (OPEN Government Act), Public Law 110-175,
required agencies to designate a Chief FOIA Officer who is then to
designate one or more FOIA Public Liaisons (5 U.S.C. 552(j) and
552(k)(6)). Sections 6, 7, 9, and 10 of the OPEN Government Act amended
provisions of the FOIA by setting time limits for agencies to act on
misdirected requests and limiting the tolling of response times (5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)); requiring tracking numbers for requests that will
take more than 10 days to process (5 U.S.C. 552 (a)(7)(A)); providing
requesters a telephone line or Internet service to obtain information
about the status of their requests, including an estimated date of
completion (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(7)(B)); expanding the definition of
``record'' to include records ``maintained for an agency by an entity
under Government contract, for the purposes of records management'' (5
U.S.C. 552(f)(2)); and introducing alternative dispute resolution to
the FOIA process through FOIA Public Liaisons (5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(ii) & (l)) and the Office of Government Information
Services (5 U.S.C. 552(h)(3)).
DHS now proposes to revise its FOIA regulations at 6 CFR part 5,
which apply to all components of DHS. This proposed rule would
implement changes required by the OPEN Government Act and make other
revisions to DHS FOIA regulations to improve access to Departmental
records.
DHS describes the primary proposed changes in the section-by-
section analysis below. DHS invites public comment on each of the
proposed changes described, as well as any other matters within the
scope of the rulemaking.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
The proposed rules continue to inform the public of the
responsibilities of DHS in conjunction with requests received under the
Freedom of Information Act as well as the requirements for filing a
proper FOIA request.
DHS is proposing to amend Subpart A to eliminate the provision for
``brick and mortar'' public reading rooms, amend DHS rules for third-
party requests for records, and add information about proactive DHS
disclosures.
Section 5.1 General Provisions
DHS is proposing to amend this part to incorporate reference to
additional DHS policies and procedures relevant to the FOIA process.
These resources, which are available at https://www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-act-foia, also include descriptions of the types of records
maintained by different DHS components. DHS is also proposing to amend
this section to clarify the definition of a component for purposes of
this proposed rule. Component means each separate organizational entity
within DHS that reports directly to the Office of the Secretary. A full
list of all DHS components would be provided in appendix I of this
proposed rule (as well
[[Page 45102]]
as in the web resources described above) for informational purposes.
DHS is proposing to add paragraph (d) to section 5.1, ``Unofficial
release of DHS information.'' This proposed paragraph seeks to inform
the public about how information that is not released through official
DHS channels will be treated in the FOIA process. DHS does not consider
information that is either inadvertently or inappropriately released by
means other than the official release process used by DHS, whether in
FOIA or otherwise, to be a FOIA release and accordingly, DHS does not
waive its ability to assert exemptions to withhold some or all of the
same records in response to a FOIA request.
Finally, DHS is proposing to remove at least two additional
portions of current section 5.1. First, current paragraph (a)(1)
clarifies that ``[i]nformation routinely provided to the public as part
of a regular DHS activity . . . may be provided to the public without
following this subpart.'' Second, current paragraph (a)(2) provides
that ``Departmental components may issue their own guidance under this
subpart pursuant to approval by DHS.'' DHS considers each of these
provisions to be self-evident, and therefore proposes to remove them
from the regulation.
Section 5.2 Proactive Disclosures of DHS Records
DHS proposes to replace prior section 5.2, ``Public Reading
Rooms,'' which was outdated, with a new section describing the
proactive disclosure of DHS records. The FOIA requires DHS to make
certain records available for public inspection and copying. Such
records are available via the internet through the electronic reading
rooms of each component. For those individuals with no access to the
internet, the DHS Privacy Office or the component Public Liaison can
provide assistance with access to records available in the electronic
reading rooms. Contact information is provided in Appendix I to this
subpart.
Section 5.3 Requirements for Making Requests
DHS proposes to amend paragraph 5.3(a) to eliminate the requirement
that third-party requesters of records pertaining to an individual
provide a written authorization from the individual that is the subject
of the records (or proof of death of the individual) as a prerequisite
to making such a request for records. As proposed, paragraph (a)(4)
would inform third-party requesters that they may receive greater
access if they provide written authorization from, or proof of death
of, the subject of the records. In certain circumstances, they may in
fact receive no access absent such authorization or proof. This
paragraph would further advise that DHS may exercise its administrative
discretion in seeking additional information from the requester to
ensure that the proper consent has been received from the subject of
the records.
DHS also proposes to amend paragraph (b) to direct requesters to
contact the FOIA Public Liaison for each component if the requester has
questions about how to describe the records that the requester seeks.
DHS also proposes to amend this part to eliminate paragraph (c), which
would be addressed under section 5.11, ``Fees.'' DHS proposes to insert
a new paragraph (c), which describes the process under which DHS may
administratively close a request if a requester fails to comply with a
request for additional information.
Section 5.4 Responsibility for Responding to Requests
DHS proposes to insert a new paragraph (c), ``Re-routing of
misdirected requests,'' to advise requesters that a component that is
in receipt of a misdirected request within DHS will redirect such a
request to the proper component without the need for further action
from the requester. In the event that a component receives a request
that should be directed outside DHS entirely, the component would
inform the requester that DHS does not collect or retain the type of
records requested. Proposed paragraph (c) would cover a different
situation than current paragraph (c), which only applies ``[w]hen a
component receives a request for a record in its possession.''
DHS proposes to combine paragraph 5.4(c), ``Consultations and
referrals,'' with current paragraph (d), ``Law Enforcement
Information,'' which covers consultation and referral of law
enforcement records. Proposed paragraph (d) would describe the process
of consultation, coordination, and referral of all records, to include
law enforcement records, consistent with equities of components,
agencies, or departments other than the responding component. Proposed
paragraph (e) restates much of the current content of section 5.7,
``Classified information.''
DHS proposes to revise current paragraph (f), ``Notice of
referral.'' Paragraph (f) currently provides that when a component
refers a request to another component or agency, it ordinarily shall
notify the requester of such referral. Consistent with current law, DHS
proposes to insert an exception to this requirement, such that the
component should not refer the records if disclosure of the identity of
the component or agency would harm an interest protected by an
applicable exemption. Instead, the component should coordinate the
response with the other component or agency, as appropriate.
DHS proposes a new paragraph, paragraph 5.4(i), ``Electronic
records and searches,'' to advise requesters of DHS's responsibilities
under the FOIA with regard to conducting searches of electronic records
and databases. DHS adheres to the requirement in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3)(C),
which states that agencies will make reasonable efforts to search for
records in electronic form or format, except when such efforts would
significantly interfere with the operation of the agency's automated
information systems. Proposed paragraph 5.4(i) seeks to clarify to
requesters the types of situations that would amount to ``significant
interference'' with the operation of agency information systems such
that DHS would not conduct a search for the requested records.
Section 5.5 Timing of Responses to Requests
DHS proposes to amend paragraph 5.5(a) to advise requesters that
the response time for misdirected requests that are re-routed under
paragraph 5.4(c) will commence on the date the request is received by
the proper component, but in any event, no later than ten working days
after the request is first received by any component. DHS proposes to
amend paragraph (b), ``Multitrack Processing,'' to include a specific
provision for a track for requests granted expedited processing.
DHS proposes to split current paragraph (c), ``Unusual
Circumstances,'' into two separately designated paragraphs. As revised,
the rule would include in paragraph 5.5(d) information on how DHS will
aggregate multiple related requests submitted by a single requester or
a group of requesters acting in concert.
DHS also proposes to redesignate current paragraph 5.5(d),
``Expedited Processing,'' as paragraph 5.5(e). DHS proposes in proposed
paragraph 5.5(e) to amend text that describes the procedures for making
a request for expedited processing of an initial request or an appeal
(current paragraph (d)), to include two new available justifications
for requesting expedited processing.
[[Page 45103]]
5.6 Responses to requests. DHS proposes to revise paragraph 5.6(a)
to encourage components to communicate with FOIA requesters having
access to the internet through electronic means, to the extent
practicable. This new paragraph is intended to address the increasing
number of FOIA requesters who are corresponding with DHS via electronic
mail and web portals. DHS proposes to move paragraph (a) to paragraph
(b), ``Acknowledgment of Requests.'' DHS proposes to amend this
paragraph to specify that DHS and its components will acknowledge a
request and assign the request an individualized tracking number if the
request will take more than ten working days to process. DHS also
proposes to require acknowledgment letters to contain a brief
description of the request to allow requesters to more easily keep
track of their requests. The provision in paragraph (a) referencing
that the acknowledgment letter will confirm the requester's agreement
to pay fees would be addressed in proposed section 5.11(e).
DHS proposes to move paragraph (b), ``Grants of requests,'' to
paragraph (c). DHS proposes to amend paragraph (b) by removing the
description of the treatment of information, both released and redacted
in documents provided to the requester. Substantially the same
information is now included in a new proposed paragraph, paragraph
5.6(f), ``Markings on Released Documents.'' DHS proposes to move the
remainder of current paragraph 5.6(c), ``Adverse determinations of
requests,'' to two paragraphs, (d) and (e), ``Adverse determinations of
requests'' and ``Content of denial.'' The language regarding adverse
determination of requests remains substantially the same. DHS proposes
to describe the content and process for denial letters in the newly
proposed paragraph (e), but does not intend this paragraph to
significantly change the current regulatory requirements concerning
denial letters.
DHS also proposes new paragraph (g), ``Use of record exclusions,''
which describes the DHS's use of exclusions under 5 U.S.C. 552(c). This
paragraph proposes to incorporate the requirement set forth by the
Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy (OIP) that all
federal agencies obtain the approval of OIP prior to invoking an
exclusion. This proposed paragraph also includes a requirement that DHS
maintain an administrative record of the process of the invocation of
the exclusion and approval by OIP.
5.7 Confidential commercial information. Proposed section 5.7,
``Confidential commercial information,'' would replace current section
5.8 of the current regulations, ``Business information.'' DHS proposes
to reorder several paragraphs within this section. The changes are for
clarity and to better advise requesters and providers of commercial
information how DHS will treat requests for confidential commercial
information, but the information contained in the proposed section
remains substantively the same.
DHS proposes to amend the ``Notice of intent to disclose''
paragraph by splitting it into two paragraphs, proposed new paragraph
(f), ``Analysis of objections'' and proposed new paragraph (g),
``Notice of intent to disclose.'' The proposed division of the
information previously contained in a single paragraph is intended to
improve clarity by highlighting in a separate paragraph that DHS will
consider a submitter's objections and specific grounds for
nondisclosure in deciding whether to disclose the requested
information. Otherwise, the information contained in the new proposed
paragraphs remains substantively the same.
Finally, DHS proposes to include an exception to this section for
commercial information provided to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) by a business submitter. Although CBP's FOIA regulations (located
at 19 CFR part 103, subpart A) are displaced by the DHS FOIA
regulations, this rule proposes to allow CBP to continue treating
commercial information in the same manner as it has since the
promulgation of current 19 CFR 103.35.
5.8 Administrative appeals. This section corresponds to section 5.9
of the current regulations. In the time following the publication of
the interim regulations in January 2003, DHS has designated Appeals
Officers for each component. As such, DHS proposes to amend paragraph
(a) to direct requesters seeking to appeal adverse determinations to
the DHS Web site or FOIA phone line for FOIA information to obtain the
name and address of the appropriate appeals officer.
DHS proposes new paragraph (b) ``Adjudication of appeal,'' which
replaces former paragraph (c) ``When appeal is required.'' The proposed
new paragraph informs requesters that the DHS Office of the General
Counsel or its designee component appeals officers are the authorized
appeals authority for DHS. New proposed paragraph (b) also informs
requesters about the treatment of appeals involving classified
information. Finally, former paragraph (a)(3), which informs requesters
that appeals will not normally be adjudicated if a FOIA lawsuit is
filed, is incorporated into proposed paragraph (b).
DHS proposes to add a new paragraph (c), ``Appeal decisions,''
which is substantially similar to current paragraph 5.9(b). Proposed
paragraph (c) would advise requesters that appeal decisions will be
made in writing, and that decisions will inform requesters of their
right to file a lawsuit and about mediation services offered by the
Office of Government Information Services. Proposed paragraph (c) would
also advise requesters of what to expect if the appeals officer
reverses or modifies the original administrative decision on appeal.
DHS also proposes to add a new paragraph (d), ``Time limit for issuing
appeal decision,'' which advises requesters of the statutory 20-day
time limit for responding to appeals, and also of the statutory 10-day
extension of the 20-day limit available to the appeals officers in
certain circumstances.
Finally, DHS proposes to add paragraph (e), ``Appeal necessary
before seeking court review,'' which advises requesters that an
administrative appeal is generally required before seeking judicial
review of a component's adverse determination. This language is
substantially similar to current paragraph 5.9(c). This proposed
paragraph also advises requesters that there is no administrative
appeal requirement prior to seeking judicial review of a denial of
request for expedited processing.
5.9 Preservation of records. DHS proposes to redesignate current
section 5.10 ``Preservation of records'' as section 5.9. There is no
change to the substantive information in the section.
5.10 FOIA requests for information contained in a Privacy Act
system of records. DHS proposes to add the new above-referenced
section, to explain to requesters how DHS treats FOIA requests for
information protected by the Privacy Act. When applicable, DHS analyzes
all requests under both the FOIA and the Privacy Act to ensure that the
requester receives the greatest amount of information possible under
federal law. This proposed section also explains the circumstances
under which a third-party requester can obtain access to information
protected by the Privacy Act.
5.11 Fees. DHS proposes to address all fee issues in section 5.11.
Most of this section remains essentially unchanged. Proposed changes to
paragraph (b) would clarify some of the definitions used by DHS in
determining a requester's fee category. For instance, paragraph (b)(1)
``Commercial use request,'' would clarify that components
[[Page 45104]]
will make determinations on commercial use on a case-by-case basis.
Paragraph (b)(4) ``Educational institution,'' would add several
examples to help requesters understand the analysis that DHS will apply
to determine whether a requester meets the criteria to be considered an
educational institution. Paragraph (b)(6), ``News media,'' clarifies
the criteria used by DHS to determine whether a requester qualifies to
be considered a member of the news media for fee purposes. Paragraph
(b)(8) ``Search,'' would eliminate superfluous language that does not
improve the comprehensibility of the paragraph. Because these and
similar proposed changes are consistent with current regulations and
describe current process, DHS does not expect that they will result in
additional costs for the government or the public.
DHS also proposes to change paragraph (c)(1)(iii), which discusses
direct costs associated with conducting any search that requires the
creation of a new computer program, as discussed in new proposed
paragraph 5.4(i), to locate the requested records. This change is
intended to improve comprehension and to more accurately describe the
circumstances under which a requester may be charged for a computerized
search or a search of electronic records. It does not represent a
change in practice, as DHS currently charges direct costs for
specialized data searches. Again, because these proposed changes are
consistent with current regulations and describe current process, DHS
does not expect that they will result in additional costs for the
government or the public.
DHS proposes to restructure paragraph (c)(3)(d), ``Restrictions on
charging fees.'' Under this proposal, search fees, and in some cases,
duplication fees may not be charged if a component fails to comply with
the time limits in which to respond to a request provided no unusual or
exceptional circumstances are present. This provision directly tracks a
mandatory provision from section 6 of the OPEN Government Act of 2007,
Public Law 110-175, 121 Stat. 2524, 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(viii).
In addition, DHS proposes to renumber former paragraph (d)(2) as
paragraph (d)(3), and paragraph (d)(3) as (d)(4). DHS proposes minor
changes in paragraph (d)(4) to improve clarity. Current paragraphs
(d)(4) and (d)(5) would be combined into proposed paragraph (d)(5). DHS
proposes changes to paragraphs (e) and (f) to improve clarity; no
significant changes are intended with respect to those paragraphs. DHS
proposes no major changes to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), or (j), but
proposes to modify a number of procedural provisions consistent with
the practices of other agencies in this area. DHS also proposes minor
changes to paragraph (k) to improve clarity. DHS proposes to eliminate
current paragraph (l), ``Payment of outstanding fees,'' as the
information in that paragraph is largely duplicative of the information
contained within proposed paragraph (i)(3)--although proposed paragraph
(i)(3) is discretionary, DHS anticipates that the result will be
substantially the same as under current paragraph (l). Except in
extraordinary circumstances, DHS will not process a FOIA request from
persons with an unpaid fee from any previous FOIA request to any
Federal agency until that outstanding fee has been paid in full to the
agency. Finally, DHS proposes to insert a chart showing fee
applicability, for ease of reference.
5.12 Confidential commercial information; CBP procedures.
As noted above, DHS proposes to include an exception to proposed
Sec. 5.7 for commercial information provided to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) by a business submitter. Although CBP's FOIA
regulations (located at 19 CFR part 103, subpart A) are displaced by
the DHS FOIA regulations, because of the unique nature of CBP's
mission, this rule proposes to allow CBP to continue treating
commercial information in the same manner as it has since the
promulgation of current 19 CFR 103.35. CBP's FOIA regulations, located
at 19 CFR part 103, subpart A, will be removed no later than the
effective date of the final rule for this rulemaking. CBP may, however,
retain cCurrent 19 CFR 103.35 as an interim measure.
5.13 Other rights and services. DHS proposes no substantive changes
to this section.
FEMA Regulations
DHS also proposes to remove FEMA's outdated FOIA regulations at 44
CFR part 5, subparts A through E. FEMA is currently operating under
DHS's title 6 FOIA regulations for all purposes.
III. Regulatory Analyses
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563--Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
DHS has considered the costs and benefits of this proposed rule.
Previously in this preamble, DHS has provided a section-by-section
analysis of the provisions in this proposed rule and concludes this
rule does not impose additional costs on the public or the government.
This rule does not collect any additional fee revenues compared to
current practices or otherwise introduce new regulatory mandates. The
rule's benefits include additional clarity for the public and DHS
personnel with respect to DHS's implementation of the FOIA and
subsequent statutory amendments.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, and
section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 601 note, agencies must consider the impact of
their rulemakings on ``small entities'' (small businesses, small
organizations and local governments). The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
DHS has reviewed this regulation and by approving it certifies that
this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Based on the previous discussion
in this preamble, DHS does not believe this rule imposes any additional
direct costs on small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small
[[Page 45105]]
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (as amended), 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects
6 CFR Part 5
Classified information, Courts, Freedom of information, Government
employees, Privacy.
19 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Courts, Freedom of information, Law enforcement, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
44 CFR Part 5
Courts, Freedom of information, Government employees.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Homeland
Security proposes to amend 6 CFR chapter I, part 5, 19 CFR chapter I,
part 103, and 44 CFR chapter I, part 5, as follows:
Title 6--Domestic Security
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OR PRODUCTION OF MATERIAL OR INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C.
101 et seq.; E.O. 13392.
0
2. In Chapter I, revise subpart A of part 5 to read as follows:
Subpart A--Procedures for Disclosure of Records Under the Freedom
of Information Act
Sec.
5.1 General provisions.
5.2 Proactive disclosures of DHS records.
5.3 Requirements for making requests.
5.4 Responsibility for responding to requests.
5.5 Timing of responses to requests.
5.6 Responses to requests.
5.7 Confidential commercial information.
5.8 Administrative appeals.
5.9 Preservation of records.
5.10 FOIA requests for information contained in a Privacy Act system
of records.
5.11 Fees.
5.12 Confidential commercial information; CBP procedures.
5.13 Other rights and services.
Appendix I to Subpart A--FOIA Contact Information
Subpart A--Procedures for Disclosure of Records Under the Freedom
of Information Act
Sec. 5.1 General provisions.
(a)(1) This subpart contains the rules that the Department of
Homeland Security follows in processing requests for records under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. The Freedom
of Information Act applies to third-party requests for documents
concerning the general activities of the government and of DHS in
particular. When an individual requests access to his or her own
records, it is considered a Privacy Act request. Such records are
maintained by DHS under the individual's name or personal identifier.
Although requests are considered either FOIA requests or Privacy Act
requests, agencies process requests in accordance with both laws, which
provides the greatest degree of lawful access while safeguarding an
individual's personal privacy.
(2) These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of the
FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines
published by the Office of Management and Budget at 52 FR 10012 (March
27, 1987) (hereinafter ``OMB Guidelines''). Additionally, DHS has
additional policies and procedures relevant to the FOIA process. These
resources are available at https://www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-act-foia. Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under
the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under subpart B
of part 5 as well as under this subpart. As a matter of policy, DHS
makes discretionary disclosures of records or information exempt from
disclosure under the FOIA whenever disclosure would not foreseeably
harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption, but this policy does
not create any right enforceable in court.
(b) As referenced in this subpart, component means the FOIA office
of each separate organizational entity within DHS that reports directly
to the Office of the Secretary.
(c) DHS has a decentralized system for processing requests, with
each component handling requests for its records.
(d) Unofficial release of DHS information. The disclosure of exempt
records, without authorization by the appropriate DHS official, is not
an official release of information; accordingly, it is not a FOIA
release. Such a release does not waive the authority of the Department
of Homeland Security to assert FOIA exemptions to withhold the same
records in response to a FOIA request. In addition, while the authority
may exist to disclose records to individuals in their official
capacity, the provisions of this part apply if the same individual
seeks the records in a private or personal capacity.
Sec. 5.2 Proactive disclosure of DHS records.
Records that are required by the FOIA to be made available for
public inspection and copying are accessible on DHS's Web site, https://www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-act-foia-and-privacy-act. Each
component is responsible for determining which of its records are
required to be made publicly available, as well as identifying
additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for
public disclosure, and for posting and indexing such records. Each
component shall ensure that posted records and indices are updated on
an ongoing basis. Each component has a FOIA Public Liaison who can
assist individuals in locating records particular to a component. A
list of DHS's FOIA Public Liaisons is available at https://www.dhs.gov/foia-contact-information and in appendix I to this subpart. If you have
no access to the internet, please contact the Public Liaison for the
component from which you are seeking records for assistance with
publicly available records.
Sec. 5.3 Requirements for making requests.
(a) General information. (1) DHS has a decentralized system for
responding to FOIA requests, with each component designating a FOIA
office to process records from that component. All components have the
capability to receive requests electronically, either through email or
a web portal. To make a request for DHS records, a requester should
write directly to the FOIA office of the component that maintains the
records being sought. A request will receive the quickest possible
response if it is addressed to the FOIA office of the component that
maintains the records sought. DHS's FOIA Reference Guide contains or
refers the reader to descriptions of the functions of each component
and provides other information that is helpful in determining where to
make a request. Each component's FOIA office and any additional
requirements for submitting a request to a given component are listed
in Appendix I of this subpart. These references can all be used by
requesters
[[Page 45106]]
to determine where to send their requests within DHS.
(2) A requester may also send his or her request to the Privacy
Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW STOP-
0655, or via the internet at https://www.dhs.gov/dhs-foia-request-submission-form, or via fax to (202) 343-4011. The Privacy Office will
forward the request to the component(s) that it determines to be most
likely to maintain the records that are sought.
(3) A requester who is making a request for records about him or
herself must comply with the verification of identity provision set
forth in subpart B of this part.
(4) Where a request for records pertains to a third party, a
requester may receive greater access by submitting either a notarized
authorization signed by that individual, in compliance with the
verification of identity provision set forth in subpart B of this part,
or a declaration made in compliance with the requirements set forth in
28 U.S.C. 1746 by that individual, authorizing disclosure of the
records to the requester, or by submitting proof that the individual is
deceased (e.g., a copy of a death certificate or an obituary). As an
exercise of its administrative discretion, each component can require a
requester to supply additional information if necessary in order to
verify that a particular individual has consented to disclosure.
(b) Description of records sought. Requesters must describe the
records sought in sufficient detail to enable DHS personnel to locate
them with a reasonable amount of effort. A reasonable description
contains sufficient information to permit an organized, non-random
search for the record based on the component's filing arrangements and
existing retrieval systems. To the extent possible, requesters should
include specific information that may assist a component in identifying
the requested records, such as the date, title or name, author,
recipient, subject matter of the record, case number, file designation,
or reference number. Requesters should refer to Appendix I of this
subpart for additional component-specific requirements. In general,
requesters should include as much detail as possible about the specific
records or the types of records that they are seeking. Before
submitting their requests, requesters may contact the component's FOIA
Officer or FOIA public liaison to discuss the records they are seeking
and to receive assistance in describing the records. If after receiving
a request, a component determines that it does not reasonably describe
the records sought, the component should inform the requester what
additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise
insufficient. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify
such a request may discuss their request with the component's
designated FOIA Officer, its FOIA Public Liaison, or a representative
of the DHS Privacy Office, each of whom is available to assist the
requester in reasonably describing the records sought. If a request
does not reasonably describe the records sought, the agency's response
to the request may be delayed.
(c) If a request does not adequately describe the records sought,
DHS may seek additional information from the requester. If the
requester does not respond to the request for additional information
within thirty (30) days, the request may be administratively closed at
DHS's discretion. This administrative closure does not prejudice the
requester's ability to submit a new request for further consideration
with additional information.
Sec. 5.4 Responsibility for responding to requests.
(a) In general. Except in the instances described in paragraphs (c)
and (d) of this section, the component that first receives a request
for a record and maintains that record is the component responsible for
responding to the request. In determining which records are responsive
to a request, a component ordinarily will include only records in its
possession as of the date that it begins its search. If any other date
is used, the component shall inform the requester of that date. A
record that is excluded from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552(c), shall not be considered responsive to a request.
(b) Authority to grant or deny requests. The head of a component,
or designee, is authorized to grant or to deny any requests for records
that are maintained by that component.
(c) Re-routing of misdirected requests. Where a component's FOIA
office determines that a request was misdirected within DHS, the
receiving component's FOIA office shall route the request to the FOIA
office of the proper component(s).
(d) Consultations, coordination and referrals. When a component
determines that it maintains responsive records that either originated
with another component or agency, or which contains information
provided by, or of substantial interest to, another component or
agency, then it shall proceed in accordance with either paragraph
(d)(1), (2), or (3) of this section, as appropriate:
(1) The component may respond to the request, after consulting with
the component or the agency that originated or has a substantial
interest in the records involved.
(2) The component may provide a combined or joint response to the
request after coordinating with the other components or agencies that
originated the record. This may include situations where the standard
referral procedure is not appropriate where disclosure of the identity
of the component or agency to which the referral would be made could
harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption, such as the
exemptions that protect personal privacy or national security
interests. For example, if a non-law enforcement component responding
to a request for records on a living third party locates records within
its files originating with a law enforcement agency, and if the
existence of that law enforcement interest in the third party was not
publicly known, then to disclose that law enforcement interest could
cause an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of the third
party. Similarly, if a component locates material within its files
originating with an Intelligence Community agency, and the involvement
of that agency in the matter is classified and not publicly
acknowledged, then to disclose or give attribution to the involvement
of that Intelligence Community agency could cause national security
harms. In such instances, in order to avoid harm to an interest
protected by an applicable exemption, the component that received the
request should coordinate with the originating component or agency to
seek its views on the disclosability of the record. The release
determination for the record that is the subject of the coordination
should then be conveyed to the requester by the component that
originally received the request.
(3) The component may refer the responsibility for responding to
the request or portion of the request to the component or agency best
able to determine whether to disclose the relevant records, or to the
agency that created or initially acquired the record as long as that
agency is subject to the FOIA. Ordinarily, the component or agency that
created or initially acquired the record will be presumed to be best
able to make the disclosure determination. The referring component
shall document the referral and maintain a copy of the records that it
refers.
(e) Classified information. On receipt of any request involving
classified
[[Page 45107]]
information, the component shall determine whether information is
currently and properly classified and take appropriate action to ensure
compliance with 6 CFR part 7. Whenever a request involves a record
containing information that has been classified or may be appropriate
for classification by another component or agency under any applicable
executive order concerning the classification of records, the receiving
component shall refer the responsibility for responding to the request
regarding that information to the component or agency that classified
the information, or should consider the information for classification.
Whenever a component's record contains information classified by
another component or agency, the component shall coordinate with or
refer the responsibility for responding to that portion of the request
to the component or agency that classified the underlying information.
(f) Notice of referral. Whenever a component refers any part of the
responsibility for responding to a request to another component or
agency, it will notify the requester of the referral and inform the
requester of the name of each component or agency to which the records
were referred, unless disclosure of the identity of the component or
agency would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption, in
which case the component should coordinate with the other component or
agency, rather than refer the records.
(g) Timing of responses to consultations and referrals. All
consultations and referrals received by DHS will be handled according
to the date that the FOIA request initially was received by the first
component or agency, not any later date.
(h) Agreements regarding consultations and referrals. Components
may establish agreements with other components or agencies to eliminate
the need for consultations or referrals with respect to particular
types of records.
(i) Electronic records and searches--(1) Significant interference.
The FOIA allows components to not conduct a search for responsive
documents if the search would cause significant interference with the
operation of the component's automated information system.
(2) Business as usual approach. A ``business as usual'' approach
exists when the component has the capability to process a FOIA request
for electronic records without a significant expenditure of monetary or
personnel resources. Components are not required to conduct a search
that does not meet this business as usual criterion.
(i) Creating computer programs or purchasing additional hardware to
extract email that has been archived for emergency retrieval usually
are not considered business as usual if extensive monetary or personnel
resources are needed to complete the project.
(ii) Creating a computer program that produces specific requested
fields or records contained within a well-defined database structure
usually is considered business as usual. The time to create this
program is considered as programmer or operator search time for fee
assessment purposes and the FOIA requester may be assessed fees in
accordance with 6 CFR 5.11(c)(1)(iii). However, creating a computer
program to merge files with disparate data formats and extract specific
elements from the resultant file is not considered business as usual,
but a special service, for which additional fees may be imposed as
specified in 6 CFR 5.11. Components are not required to perform special
services and creation of a computer program for a fee is up to the
discretion of the component and is dependent on component resources and
expertise.
(3) Data links. Components are not required to expend DHS funds to
establish data links that provide real time or near-real-time data to a
FOIA requester.
Sec. 5.5 Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. Components ordinarily will respond to requests
according to their order of receipt. Appendix I to this subpart
contains the list of components that are designated to accept requests.
In instances involving misdirected requests that are re-routed pursuant
to 6 CFR 5.4(c), the response time will commence on the date that the
request is received by the proper component, but in any event not later
than ten working days after the request is first received by any DHS
component designated in appendix I of this subpart.
(b) Multitrack processing. All components must designate a specific
track for requests that are granted expedited processing, in accordance
with the standards set forth in paragraph (e) of this section. A
component may also designate additional processing tracks that
distinguish between simple and more complex requests based on the
estimated amount of work or time needed to process the request. Among
the factors a component may consider are the number of pages involved
in processing the request or the need for consultations or referrals.
Components shall advise requesters of the track into which their
request falls, and when appropriate, shall offer requesters an
opportunity to narrow their request so that the request can be placed
in a different processing track.
(c) Unusual circumstances. Whenever the statutory time limits for
processing a request cannot be met because of ``unusual
circumstances,'' as defined in the FOIA, and the component extends the
time limits on that basis, the component shall, before expiration of
the twenty-day period to respond, notify the requester in writing of
the unusual circumstances involved and of the date by which processing
of the request can be expected to be completed. Where the extension
exceeds ten working days, the component shall, as described by the
FOIA, provide the requester with an opportunity to modify the request
or agree to an alternative time period for processing. The component
shall make available its designated FOIA Officer and its FOIA Public
Liaison for this purpose.
(d) Aggregating requests. For the purposes of satisfying unusual
circumstances under the FOIA, components may aggregate requests in
cases where it reasonably appears that multiple requests, submitted
either by a requester or by a group of requesters acting in concert,
constitute a single request that would otherwise involve unusual
circumstances. Components will not aggregate multiple requests that
involve unrelated matters.
(e) Expedited processing. (1) Requests and appeals will be
processed on an expedited basis whenever the component determines that
they involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited processing could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual;
(ii) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
federal government activity, if made by a person who is primarily
engaged in disseminating information;
(iii) The loss of substantial due process rights; or
(iv) A matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which
there exist possible questions about the government's integrity which
affect public confidence.
(2) A request for expedited processing may be made at any time.
Requests based on paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this section
must be submitted to the component that maintains the records
requested. When making a request for expedited processing of an
administrative appeal, the request should be submitted to the DHS
Office
[[Page 45108]]
of General Counsel or the component Appeals Officer. Address
information is available at the DHS Web site, https://www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-act-foia, or by contacting the component FOIA
officers via the information listed in Appendix I. Requests for
expedited processing that are based on paragraph (e)(1)(iv) of this
section must be submitted to the Senior Director of FOIA Operations,
the Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray
Lane SW., STOP-0655, Washington, DC 20598-0655. A component that
receives a misdirected request for expedited processing under the
standard set forth in paragraph (e)(1)(iv) of this section shall
forward it immediately to the DHS Senior Director of FOIA Operations,
the Privacy Office, for determination. The time period for making the
determination on the request for expedited processing under paragraph
(e)(1)(iv) of this section shall commence on the date that the Privacy
Office receives the request, provided that it is routed within ten
working days, but in no event shall the time period for making a
determination on the request commence any later than the eleventh
working day after the request is received by any component designated
in appendix I of this subpart.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct, explaining in detail the
basis for making the request for expedited processing. For example,
under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, a requester who is not a
full-time member of the news media must establish that he or she is a
person whose primary professional activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his or her sole occupation. Such a
requester also must establish a particular urgency to inform the public
about the government activity involved in the request--one that extends
beyond the public's right to know about government activity generally.
The existence of numerous articles published on a given subject can be
helpful to establishing the requirement that there be an ``urgency to
inform'' the public on the topic. As a matter of administrative
discretion, a component may waive the formal certification requirement.
(4) A component shall notify the requester within ten calendar days
of the receipt of a request for expedited processing of its decision
whether to grant or deny expedited processing. If expedited processing
is granted, the request shall be given priority, placed in the
processing track for expedited requests, and shall be processed as soon
as practicable. If a request for expedited processing is denied, any
appeal of that decision shall be acted on expeditiously.
Sec. 5.6 Responses to requests.
(a) In general. Components should, to the extent practicable,
communicate with requesters having access to the internet using
electronic means, such as email or web portal.
(b) Acknowledgments of requests. A component shall acknowledge the
request and assign it an individualized tracking number if it will take
longer than ten working days to process. Components shall include in
the acknowledgment a brief description of the records sought to allow
requesters to more easily keep track of their requests.
(c) Grants of requests. Ordinarily, a component shall have twenty
(20) working days from when a request is received to determine whether
to grant or deny the request unless there are unusual or exceptional
circumstances. Once a component makes a determination to grant a
request in full or in part, it shall notify the requester in writing.
The component also shall inform the requester of any fees charged under
6 CFR 5.11 and shall disclose the requested records to the requester
promptly upon payment of any applicable fees.
(d) Adverse determinations of requests. A component making an
adverse determination denying a request in any respect shall notify the
requester of that determination in writing. Adverse determinations, or
denials of requests, include decisions that the requested record is
exempt, in whole or in part; the request does not reasonably describe
the records sought; the information requested is not a record subject
to the FOIA; the requested record does not exist, cannot be located, or
has been destroyed; or the requested record is not readily reproducible
in the form or format sought by the requester. Adverse determinations
also include denials involving fees, including requester categories or
fee waiver matters, or denials of requests for expedited processing.
(e) Content of denial. The denial shall be signed by the head of
the component, or designee, and shall include:
(1) The name and title or position of the person responsible for
the denial;
(2) A brief statement of the reasons for the denial, including any
FOIA exemption applied by the component in denying the request;
(3) An estimate of the volume of any records or information
withheld, for example, by providing the number of pages or some other
reasonable form of estimation. This estimation is not required if the
volume is otherwise indicated by deletions marked on records that are
disclosed in part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption; and
(4) A statement that the denial may be appealed under 6 CFR 5.8(a),
and a description of the requirements set forth therein.
(f) Markings on released documents. Markings on released documents
must be clearly visible to the requester. Records disclosed in part
shall be marked to show the amount of information deleted and the
exemption under which the deletion was made unless doing so would harm
an interest protected by an applicable exemption. The location of the
information deleted also shall be indicated on the record, if
technically feasible.
(g) Use of record exclusions. (1) In the event that a component
identifies records that may be subject to exclusion from the
requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), the head of the
FOIA office of that component must confer with Department of Justice's
Office of Information Policy (OIP) to obtain approval to apply the
exclusion.
(2) Any component invoking an exclusion shall maintain an
administrative record of the process of invocation and approval of the
exclusion by OIP.
Sec. 5.7 Confidential commercial information.
(a) Definitions.
(1) Confidential commercial information means commercial or
financial information obtained by DHS from a submitter that may be
protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA.
(2) Submitter means any person or entity from whom DHS obtains
confidential commercial information, directly or indirectly.
(b) Designation of confidential commercial information. A submitter
of confidential commercial information must use good faith efforts to
designate by appropriate markings, either at the time of submission or
within a reasonable time thereafter, any portion of its submission that
it considers to be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. These
designations will expire ten years after the date of the submission
unless the submitter requests and provides justification for a longer
designation period.
(c) When notice to submitters is required. (1) A component shall
promptly provide written notice to a submitter whenever records
containing such information are requested under the FOIA if, after
reviewing the request,
[[Page 45109]]
the responsive records, and any appeal by the requester, the component
determines that it may be required to disclose the records, provided:
(i) The requested information has been designated in good faith by
the submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(ii) The component has a reason to believe that the requested
information may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4.
(2) The notice shall either describe the commercial information
requested or include a copy of the requested records or portions of
records containing the information. In cases involving a voluminous
number of submitters, notice may be made by posting or publishing the
notice in a place or manner reasonably likely to accomplish it.
(d) Exceptions to submitter notice requirements. The notice
requirements of paragraphs (c) and (g) of this section shall not apply
if:
(1) The component determines that the information is exempt under
the FOIA;
(2) The information lawfully has been published or has been
officially made available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by a statute other
than the FOIA or by a regulation issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12600 of June 23, 1987; or
(4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (b) of
this section appears obviously frivolous, except that, in such a case,
the component shall give the submitter written notice of any final
decision to disclose the information and must provide that notice
within a reasonable number of days prior to a specified disclosure
date.
(e) Opportunity to object to disclosure. (1) A component will
specify a reasonable time period within which the submitter must
respond to the notice referenced above. If a submitter has any
objections to disclosure, it should provide the component a detailed
written statement that specifies all grounds for withholding the
particular information under any exemption of the FOIA. In order to
rely on Exemption 4 as basis for nondisclosure, the submitter must
explain why the information constitutes a trade secret, or commercial
or financial information that is privileged or confidential.
(2) A submitter who fails to respond within the time period
specified in the notice shall be considered to have no objection to
disclosure of the information. Information received by the component
after the date of any disclosure decision will not be considered by the
component. Any information provided by a submitter under this subpart
may itself be subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(f) Analysis of objections. A component shall consider a
submitter's objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in
deciding whether to disclose the requested information.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. Whenever a component decides to
disclose information over the objection of a submitter, the component
shall provide the submitter written notice, which shall include:
(1) A statement of the reasons why each of the submitter's
disclosure objections was not sustained;
(2) A description of the information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which shall be a reasonable time
subsequent to the notice.
(h) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of confidential commercial
information, the component shall promptly notify the submitter.
(i) Requester notification. The component shall notify a requester
whenever it provides the submitter with notice and an opportunity to
object to disclosure; whenever it notifies the submitter of its intent
to disclose the requested information; and whenever a submitter files a
lawsuit to prevent the disclosure of the information.
(j) Scope. This section shall not apply to any confidential
commercial information provided to CBP by a business submitter. 6 CFR
5.12 applies to such information. 6 CFR 5.12 also defines
``confidential commercial information'' as used in this paragraph.
Sec. 5.8 Administrative appeals
(a) Requirements for filing an appeal.
(1) A requester may appeal adverse determinations denying his or
her request or any part of the request to the appropriate Appeals
Officer. A requester may also appeal if he or she questions the
adequacy of the component's search for responsive records, or believes
the component either misinterpreted the request or did not address all
aspects of the request (i.e., it issued an incomplete response), or if
the requester believes there is a procedural deficiency (e.g., fees
were improperly calculated). For the address of the appropriate
component Appeals Officer, contact the applicable component FOIA
liaison using the information in appendix I to this subpart, visit
www.dhs.gov/foia, or call 1-866-431-0486. An appeal must be in writing,
and to be considered timely it must be postmarked or, in the case of
electronic submissions, transmitted to the Appeals Officer within 60
business days after the date of the component's response. The appeal
should clearly identify the component determination (including the
assigned request number if the requester knows it) that is being
appealed and should contain the reasons the requester believes the
determination was erroneous. To facilitate handling, the requester
should mark both the letter and the envelope, or the transmittal line
in the case of electronic transmissions ``Freedom of Information Act
Appeal.''
(2) An adverse determination by the component appeals officer will
be the final action of DHS.
(b) Adjudication of appeals. (1) The DHS Office of the General
Counsel or its designee (e.g., component Appeals Officers) is the
authorized appeals authority for DHS;
(2) On receipt of any appeal involving classified information, the
Appeals Officer shall consult with the Chief Security Officer, and take
appropriate action to ensure compliance with 6 CFR part 7;
(3) If the appeal becomes the subject of a lawsuit, the Appeals
Officer is not required to act further on the appeal.
(c) Appeal decisions. The decision on the appeal will be made in
writing. A decision that upholds a component's determination will
contain a statement that identifies the reasons for the affirmance,
including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision will provide the
requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit
and will inform the requester of the mediation services offered by the
Office of Government Information Services, of the National Archives and
Records Administration, as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation.
If the adverse decision is reversed or modified on appeal, in whole or
in part, the requester will be notified in a written decision and the
request will be thereafter be further processed in accordance with that
appeal decision.
(d) Time limit for issuing appeal decision. The statutory time
limit for responding to appeals is generally 20 workdays after receipt.
However, the Appeals Officer may extend the time limit for responding
to an appeal provided the circumstances set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(i) are met.
(e) Appeal necessary before seeking court review. If a requester
wishes to seek court review of a component's adverse determination on a
matter appealable under subsection (a)(1) of this section, the
requester must
[[Page 45110]]
generally first appeal it under this subpart. However, a requester is
not required to first file an appeal of an adverse determination of a
request for expedited processing prior to seeking court review.
Sec. 5.9 Preservation of records.
Each component shall preserve all correspondence pertaining to the
requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all
requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized
pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records
Schedule 4.2 and/or 14 of the National Archives and Records
Administration. Records will not be disposed of or destroyed while they
are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the
FOIA.
Sec. 5.10 FOIA requests for information contained in a Privacy Act
system of records.
(a) Information subject to Privacy Act. (1) If a requester submits
a FOIA request for information about him or herself that is contained
in a Privacy Act system of records applicable to the requester (i.e.,
the information contained in the system of records is retrieved by the
component using the requester's name or other personal identifier, and
the information pertains to an individual covered by the Privacy Act)
the request will be processed under both the FOIA and the Privacy Act.
(2) If the information the requester is seeking is not subject to
the Privacy Act (e.g., the information is filed under another subject,
such as an organization, activity, event, or an investigation not
retrievable by the requester's name or personal identifier), the
request, if otherwise properly made, will be treated only as a FOIA
request. In addition, if the information is covered by the Privacy Act
and the requester does not provide proper verification of the
requester's identity, the request, if otherwise properly made, will be
processed only under the FOIA.
(b) When both Privacy Act and FOIA exemptions apply. Only if both a
Privacy Act exemption and a FOIA exemption apply can DHS withhold
information from a requester if the information sought by the requester
is about him or herself and is contained in a Privacy Act system of
records applicable to the requester.
(c) Conditions for release of Privacy Act information to third
parties in response to a FOIA request. If a requester submits a FOIA
request for Privacy Act information about another individual, the
information will not be disclosed without that person's prior written
consent that provides the same verification information that the person
would have been required to submit for information about him or
herself, unless--
(1) The information is required to be released under the FOIA, as
provided by 5 U.S.C. 552a (b)(2); or
(2) In most circumstances, if the individual is deceased.
(d) Privacy Act requirements. See DHS's Privacy Act regulations in
5 CFR part 5, subpart B for additional information regarding the
requirements of the Privacy Act.
Sec. 5.11 Fees.
(a) In general. Components shall charge for processing requests
under the FOIA in accordance with the provisions of this section and
with the OMB Guidelines. Components will ordinarily use the most
efficient and least expensive method for processing requested records.
In order to resolve any fee issues that arise under this section, a
component may contact a requester for additional information. A
component ordinarily will collect all applicable fees before sending
copies of records to a requester. If you make a FOIA request, it shall
be considered a firm commitment by you to pay all applicable fees
charged under Sec. 5.11, up to $25.00, unless you seek a waiver of
fees. Requesters must pay fees by check or money order made payable to
the Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. Generally, ``requester category'' means one of the
three categories in which agencies place requesters for the purpose of
determining whether a requester will be charged fees for search, review
and duplication; categories include commercial requesters,
noncommercial scientific or educational institutions or news media
requesters, and all other requesters. The term ``fee waiver'' means
that processing fees will be waived, or reduced, if a requester can
demonstrate that certain statutory standards are satisfied including
that the information is in the public interest and is not requested for
a commercial interest. For purposes of this section:
(1) Commercial use request is a request that asks for information
for a use or a purpose that furthers a commercial, trade, or profit
interest, which can include furthering those interests through
litigation. A component's decision to place a requester in the
commercial use category will be made on a case-by-case basis based on
the requester's intended use of the information.
(2) Direct costs are those expenses that an agency expends in
searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial use
requests, reviewing) records in order to respond to a FOIA request. For
example, direct costs include the salary of the employee performing the
work (i.e., the basic rate of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of
that rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating computers and
other electronic equipment, such as photocopiers and scanners. Direct
costs do not include overhead expenses such as the costs of space, and
of heating or lighting a facility.
(3) Duplication is reproducing a copy of a record or of the
information contained in it, necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Copies can take the form of paper, audiovisual materials, or electronic
records, among others.
(4) Educational institution is any school that operates a program
of scholarly research. A requester in this fee category must show that
the request is authorized by, and is made under the auspices of, an
educational institution and that the records are not sought for a
commercial use, but rather are sought to further scholarly research. To
fall within this fee category the request must serve the scholarly
research goal of the institution rather than an individual research
goal.
Example 1. A request from a professor of geology at a university
for records relating to soil erosion, written on letterhead of the
Department of Geology, would be presumed to be from an educational
institution if the request adequately describes how the requested
information would further a specific research goal of the educational
institution.
Example 2. A request from the same professor of geology seeking
immigration information from the U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement in furtherance of a murder mystery he is writing would not
be presumed to be an institutional request, regardless of whether it
was written on institutional stationery.
Example 3. A student who makes a request in furtherance of the
completion of a course of instruction would be presumed to be carrying
out an individual research goal, rather than a scholarly research goal
of the institution, and would not qualify as part of this fee category.
Note: These examples are provided for guidance purposes only.
Each individual request will be evaluated under the particular
facts, circumstances, and information provided by the requester.
(5) Noncommercial scientific institution is an institution that is
not operated on a ``commercial'' basis, as
[[Page 45111]]
defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that is operated
solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research the results of
which are not intended to promote any particular product or industry. A
requester in this category must show that the request is authorized by
and is made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the
records are sought to further scientific research and not for a
commercial use.
(6) Representative of the news media is any person or entity
organized and operated to publish or broadcast news to the public that
actively gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the
public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience. The term
``news'' means information that is about current events or that would
be of current interest to the public. Examples of news media entities
include television or radio stations that broadcast ``news'' to the
public at large and publishers of periodicals that disseminate ``news''
and make their products available through a variety of means to the
general public, including but not limited to, news organizations that
disseminate solely on the Internet. A request for records that supports
the news-dissemination function of the requester shall not be
considered to be for a commercial use. In contrast, data brokers or
others who merely compile and market government information for direct
economic return shall not be presumed to be news media entities.
``Freelance'' journalists must demonstrate a solid basis for expecting
publication through a news media entity in order to be considered as
working for a news media entity. A publication contract would provide
the clearest evidence that publication is expected; however, components
shall also consider a requester's past publication record in making
this determination.
(7) Review is the page-by-page, line-by-line examination of a
record located in response to a request in order to determine whether
any portion of it is exempt from disclosure. Review time includes
processing any record for disclosure, such as doing all that is
necessary to prepare the record for disclosure, including the process
of redacting the record and marking the appropriate exemptions. Review
costs are properly charged even if a record ultimately is not
disclosed. Review time also includes time spent both obtaining and
considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a confidential
commercial information submitter under 6 CFR 5.7 or 6 CFR 5.12, but it
does not include time spent resolving general legal or policy issues
regarding the application of exemptions.
(8) Search is the process of looking for and retrieving records or
information responsive to a request. Search time includes page-by-page
or line-by-line identification of information within records; and the
reasonable efforts expended to locate and retrieve information from
electronic records. Components shall ensure that searches are done in
the most efficient and least expensive manner reasonably possible by
readily available means.
(c) Charging fees. In responding to FOIA requests, components shall
charge the following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been
granted under paragraph (k) of this section. Because the fee amounts
provided below already account for the direct costs associated with a
given fee type, unless otherwise stated in Sec. 5.11, components
should not add any additional costs to those charges.
(1) Search. (i) Search fees shall be charged for all requests
subject to the restrictions of paragraph (d) of this section.
Components may properly charge for time spent searching even if they do
not locate any responsive records or if they determine that the records
are entirely exempt from disclosure.
(ii) For each quarter hour spent by personnel searching for
requested records, including electronic searches that do not require
new programming, the fees will be as follows: Managerial--$10.25;
professional--$7.00; and clerical/administrative--$4.00.
(iii) Requesters will be charged the direct costs associated with
conducting any search that requires the creation of a new computer
program, as referenced in section 5.4, to locate the requested records.
Requesters shall be notified of the costs associated with creating such
a program and must agree to pay the associated costs before the costs
may be incurred.
(iv) For requests that require the retrieval of records stored by
an agency at a federal records center operated by the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA), additional costs shall be charged in
accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate Schedule established by
NARA.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will be charged to all
requesters, subject to the restrictions of paragraph (d) of this
section. A component shall honor a requester's preference for receiving
a record in a particular form or format where it is readily
reproducible by the component in the form or format requested. Where
photocopies are supplied, the component will provide one copy per
request at a cost of ten cents per page. For copies of records produced
on tapes, disks, or other media, components will charge the direct
costs of producing the copy, including operator time. Where paper
documents must be scanned in order to comply with a requester's
preference to receive the records in an electronic format, the
requester shall pay the direct costs associated with scanning those
materials. For other forms of duplication, components will charge the
direct costs.
(3) Review. Review fees will be charged to requesters who make
commercial use requests. Review fees will be assessed in connection
with the initial review of the record, i.e., the review conducted by a
component to determine whether an exemption applies to a particular
record or portion of a record. No charge will be made for review at the
administrative appeal stage of exemptions applied at the initial review
stage. However, when the appellate authority determines that a
particular exemption no longer applies, any costs associated with a
component's re-review of the records in order to consider the use of
other exemptions may be assessed as review fees. Review fees will be
charged at the same rates as those charged for a search under paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) of this section.
(d) Restrictions on charging fees. (1) No search fees will be
charged for requests by educational institutions (unless the records
are sought for a commercial use), noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the news media.
(2) If a component fails to comply with the time limits in which to
respond to a request, and if no unusual or exceptional circumstances,
as those terms are defined by the FOIA, apply to the processing of the
request, it may not charge search fees, or, in the instances of
requests from requesters described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section,
may not charge duplication fees.
(3) No search or review fees will be charged for a quarter-hour
period unless more than half of that period is required for search or
review.
(4) Except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use,
components will provide without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent for
other media); and
(ii) The first two hours of search.
(5) When, after first deducting the 100 free pages (or its cost
equivalent) and the first two hours of search, a total fee calculated
under paragraph (c) of this
[[Page 45112]]
section is $14.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged.
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $25.00. (1) When a
component determines or estimates that the fees to be assessed in
accordance with this section will exceed $25.00, the component shall
notify the requester of the actual or estimated amount of the fees,
including a breakdown of the fees for search, review and/or
duplication, unless the requester has indicated a willingness to pay
fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion of the fee can be
estimated readily, the component shall advise the requester
accordingly. If the requester is a noncommercial use requester, the
notice will specify that the requester is entitled to his or her
statutory entitlements of 100 pages of duplication at no charge and, if
the requester is charged search fees, two hours of search time at no
charge, and will advise the requester whether those entitlements have
been provided.
(2) In cases in which a requester has been notified that the actual
or estimated fees are in excess of $25.00, the request shall not be
considered perfected and further work will not be completed until the
requester commits in writing to pay the actual or estimated total fee,
or designates some amount of fees he or she is willing to pay, or in
the case of a noncommercial use requester who has not yet been provided
with his or her statutory entitlements, designates that he or she seeks
only that which can be provided by the statutory entitlements. The
requester must provide the commitment or designation in writing, and
must, when applicable, designate an exact dollar amount the requester
is willing to pay. Components are not required to accept payments in
installments.
(3) If the requester has indicated a willingness to pay some
designated amount of fees, but the component estimates that the total
fee will exceed that amount, the component will toll the processing of
the request while it notifies the requester of the estimated fees in
excess of the amount the requester has indicated a willingness to pay.
The component shall inquire whether the requester wishes to revise the
amount of fees he or she is willing to pay and/or modify the request.
Once the requester responds, the time to respond will resume from where
it was at the date of the notification.
(4) Components will make available their FOIA Public Liaison or
other FOIA professional to assist any requester in reformulating a
request to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost.
(f) Charges for other services. Although not required to provide
special services, if a component chooses to do so as a matter of
administrative discretion, the direct costs of providing the service
will be charged. Examples of such services include certifying that
records are true copies, providing multiple copies of the same
document, or sending records by means other than first class mail.
(g) Charging interest. Components may charge interest on any unpaid
bill starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the
requester. Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31
U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the billing date until payment is
received by the component. Components will follow the provisions of the
Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as
amended, and its administrative procedures, including the use of
consumer reporting agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. When a component reasonably believes that
a requester or a group of requesters acting in concert is attempting to
divide a single request into a series of requests for the purpose of
avoiding fees, the component may aggregate those requests and charge
accordingly. Components may presume that multiple requests of this type
made within a 30-day period have been made in order to avoid fees. For
requests separated by a longer period, components will aggregate them
only where there is a reasonable basis for determining that aggregation
is warranted in view of all the circumstances involved. Multiple
requests involving unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described
in paragraphs (i)(2) and (3) of this section, a component shall not
require the requester to make an advance payment before work is
commenced or continued on a request. Payment owed for work already
completed (i.e., payment before copies are sent to a requester) is not
an advance payment.
(2) When a component determines or estimates that a total fee to be
charged under this section will exceed $250.00, it may require that the
requester make an advance payment up to the amount of the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to process the request. A component
may elect to process the request prior to collecting fees when it
receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from a requester with
a history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly
charged FOIA fee to any component or agency within 30 calendar days of
the billing date, a component may require that the requester pay the
full amount due, plus any applicable interest on that prior request and
the component may require that the requester make an advance payment of
the full amount of any anticipated fee, before the component begins to
process a new request or continues to process a pending request or any
pending appeal. Where a component has a reasonable basis to believe
that a requester has misrepresented his or her identity in order to
avoid paying outstanding fees, it may require that the requester
provide proof of identity.
(4) In cases in which a component requires advance payment, the
request shall not be considered received and further work will not be
completed until the required payment is received. If the requester does
not pay the advance payment within 30 calendar days after the date of
the component's fee determination, the request will be closed.
(j) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any
statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees
for particular types of records. In instances where records responsive
to a request are subject to a statutorily-based fee schedule program,
the component will inform the requester of the contact information for
that source.
(k) Requirements for waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records
responsive to a request shall be furnished without charge or at a
reduced rate below that established under paragraph (c) of this
section, where a component determines, on a case-by-case basis, based
on all available information, that the requester has demonstrated that:
(i) Disclosure of the requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or activities of the government; and
(ii) Disclosure of the information is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
(2) In deciding whether disclosure of the requested information is
in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly
to public understanding of operations or activities of the government,
components will consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request must concern identifiable operations
or activities of the federal government, with a connection that is
direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) Disclosure of the requested records must be meaningfully
[[Page 45113]]
informative about government operations or activities in order to be
``likely to contribute'' to an increased public understanding of those
operations or activities. The disclosure of information that already is
in the public domain, in either the same or a substantially identical
form, would not contribute to such understanding where nothing new
would be added to the public's understanding.
(iii) The disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons interested in the subject, as
opposed to the individual understanding of the requester. A requester's
expertise in the subject area as well as his or her ability and
intention to effectively convey information to the public shall be
considered. It shall be presumed that a representative of the news
media will satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The public's understanding of the subject in question must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a significant extent. However, components
shall not make value judgments about whether the information at issue
is ``important'' enough to be made public.
(3) To determine whether disclosure of the requested information is
primarily in the commercial interest of the requester, components will
consider the following factors:
(i) Components shall identify any commercial interest of the
requester, as defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, that would
be furthered by the requested disclosure. Requesters shall be given an
opportunity to provide explanatory information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) A waiver or reduction of fees is justified where the public
interest is greater than any identified commercial interest in
disclosure. Components ordinarily shall presume that where a news media
requester has satisfied the public interest standard, the public
interest will be the interest primarily served by disclosure to that
requester. Disclosure to data brokers or others who merely compile and
market government information for direct economic return shall not be
presumed to primarily serve the public interest.
(4) Where only some of the records to be released satisfy the
requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver shall be granted for those
records.
(5) Requests for a waiver or reduction of fees should be made when
the request is first submitted to the component and should address the
criteria referenced above. A requester may submit a fee waiver request
at a later time so long as the underlying record request is pending or
on administrative appeal. When a requester who has committed to pay
fees subsequently asks for a waiver of those fees and that waiver is
denied, the requester will be required to pay any costs incurred up to
the date the fee waiver request was received.
(6) Summary of fees. The following table summarizes the chargeable
fees (excluding direct fees identified in Sec. 5.11) for each
requester category.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Search fees Review fees Duplication fees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial-use................... Yes................. Yes................. Yes.
Educational or Non-Commercial No.................. No.................. Yes (100 pages free).
Scientific Institution.
News Media....................... No.................. No.................. Yes (100 pages free).
Other requesters................. Yes (2 hours free).. No.................. Yes (100 pages free).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 5.12 Confidential commercial information; CBP procedures.
(a) In general. For purposes of this section, ``commercial
information'' is defined as trade secret, commercial, or financial
information obtained from a person. Commercial information provided to
CBP by a business submitter and that CBP determines is privileged or
confidential commercial or financial information will be treated as
privileged or confidential and will not be disclosed pursuant to a
Freedom of Information Act request or otherwise made known in any
manner except as provided in this section.
(b) Notice to business submitters of FOIA requests for disclosure.
Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, CBP will
provide business submitters with prompt written notice of receipt of
FOIA requests or appeals that encompass their commercial information.
The written notice will describe either the exact nature of the
commercial information requested, or enclose copies of the records or
those portions of the records that contain the commercial information.
The written notice also will advise the business submitter of its right
to file a disclosure objection statement as provided under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section. CBP will provide notice to business submitters
of FOIA requests for the business submitter's commercial information
for a period of not more than 10 years after the date the business
submitter provides CBP with the information, unless the business
submitter requests, and provides acceptable justification for, a
specific notice period of greater duration.
(1) When notice is required. CBP will provide business submitters
with notice of receipt of a FOIA request or appeal whenever:
(i) The business submitter has in good faith designated the
information as commercially- or financially-sensitive information. The
business submitter's claim of confidentiality should be supported by a
statement by an authorized representative of the business entity
providing specific justification that the information in question is
considered confidential commercial or financial information and that
the information has not been disclosed to the public; or
(ii) CBP has reason to believe that disclosure of the commercial
information could reasonably be expected to cause substantial
competitive harm.
(2) When notice is not required. The notice requirements of this
section will not apply if:
(i) CBP determines that the commercial information will not be
disclosed;
(ii) The commercial information has been lawfully published or
otherwise made available to the public; or
(iii) Disclosure of the information is required by law (other than
5 U.S.C. 552).
(c) Procedure when notice given. (1) Opportunity for business
submitter to object to disclosure. A business submitter receiving
written notice from CBP of receipt of a FOIA request or appeal
encompassing its commercial information may object to any disclosure of
the commercial information by providing CBP with a detailed statement
of reasons within 10 days of the date of the notice (exclusive of
Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays). The statement should
specify all the grounds for withholding any of the commercial
information under any exemption of the FOIA and, in the case of
Exemption 4, should demonstrate why the information is considered to be
a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is
privileged or confidential. The disclosure objection
[[Page 45114]]
information provided by a person pursuant to this paragraph may be
subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(2) Notice to FOIA requester. When notice is given to a business
submitter under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, notice will also be
given to the FOIA requester that the business submitter has been given
an opportunity to object to any disclosure of the requested commercial
information.
(d) Notice of intent to disclose. CBP will consider carefully a
business submitter's objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure
prior to determining whether to disclose commercial information.
Whenever CBP decides to disclose the requested commercial information
over the objection of the business submitter, CBP will provide written
notice to the business submitter of CBP's intent to disclose, which
will include:
(1) A statement of the reasons for which the business submitter's
disclosure objections were not sustained;
(2) A description of the commercial information to be disclosed;
and
(3) A specified disclosure date which will not be less than 10 days
(exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the
notice of intent to disclose the requested information has been issued
to the business submitter. Except as otherwise prohibited by law, CBP
will also provide a copy of the notice of intent to disclose to the
FOIA requester at the same time.
(e) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a FOIA requester brings suit
seeking to compel the disclosure of commercial information covered by
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, CBP will promptly notify the business
submitter in writing.
Sec. 5.13 Other rights and services.
Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle any person,
as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which
such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Appendix I to Subpart A--FOIA Contact Information
Department of Homeland Security Chief FOIA Officer
Chief Privacy Officer/Chief FOIA Officer, The Privacy Office,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., STOP-
0655, Washington, DC 20528-0655.
Department of Homeland Security Deputy Chief FOIA Officer
Deputy Chief FOIA Officer, The Privacy Office, U.S. Department
of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., STOP-0655, Washington, DC
20528-0655.
Senior Director, FOIA Operations
Sr. Director, FOIA Operations, The Privacy Office, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., STOP-0655,
Washington, DC 20528-0655, Phone: 202-343-1743 or 866-431-0486, Fax:
202-343-4011, Email: foia@hq.dhs.gov.
Director, FOIA Production and Quality Assurance
Public Liaison, FOIA Production and Quality Assurance, The
Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray
Lane SW., STOP-0655, Washington, DC 20528-0655, Phone: 202-343-1743
or 866-431-0486, Fax: 202-343-4011, Email: foia@hq.dhs.gov.
U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, 90 K Street NE., 9th Floor,
Washington, DC 20229-1181, Phone: 202-325-0150, Fax: 202-325-0230.
Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202-357-1218, Email:
CRCL@dhs.gov.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, 500 C Street SW., Room 7NE,
Washington, DC 20472, Phone: 202-646-3323, Email: fema-foia@dhs.gov.
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, Building #681, Suite 187B, Glynco,
GA 31524, Phone: 912-267-3103, Fax: 912-267-3113, Email: fletc-foia@dhs.gov.
National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 703-235-2211, Fax: 703-235-
2052, Email: NPPD.FOIA@dhs.gov.
Office of Biometric Identity Management (OBIM) FOIA Officer
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20598-0628,
Phone: 202-298-5454, Fax: 202-298-5445, E-Mail: OBIM-FOIA@ice.dhs.gov.
Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202-447-4883, Fax: 202-612-
1936, Email: I&AFOIA@hq.dhs.gov.
Office of Inspector General (OIG)
FOIA Public Liaison, DHS-OIG Counsel, STOP 0305, 245 Murray Lane
SW., Washington, DC 20528-0305, Phone: 202-254-4001, Fax: 202-254-
4398, Email: FOIA.OIG@oig.dhs.gov.
Office of Operations Coordination and Planning (OPS)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202-447-4156, Fax: 202-282-
9811, Email: FOIAOPS@DHS.GOV.
Science & Technology Directorate (S&T)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528, Phone: 202-254-6342, Fax: 202-254-
6739, Email: stfoia@hq.dhs.gov.
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, Freedom of Information Act Branch,
601 S. 12th Street, 11th Floor, East Tower, TSA-20, Arlington, VA
20598-6020, Phone: 1-866-FOIA-TSA or 571-227-2300, Fax: 571-227-
1406, Email: foia.tsa@dhs.gov.
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS)
FOIA Officer/Public Liaison, National Records Center, FOIA/PA
Office, P.O. Box 648010, Lee's Summit, MO 64064-8010, Phone: 1-800-
375-5283 (USCIS National Customer Service Unit), Fax: 816-350-5785,
Email: uscis.foia@uscis.dhs.gov.
United States Coast Guard (USCG)
Commandant (CG-611), 2100 2nd St. SW., Attn: FOIA Officer/Public
Liaison, Washington, DC 20593-0001, FOIA Requester Service Center
Contact: Amanda Ackerson, Phone: 202-475-3522, Fax: 202-475-3927,
Email: efoia@uscg.mil.
United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Freedom of Information Act Office, FOIA Officer/Public Liaison,
500 12th Street SW., Stop 5009, Washington, DC 20536-5009.
FOIA Requester Service Center Contact, Phone: 866-633-1182, Fax:
202-732-4265, Email: ice-foia@dhs.gov.
United States Secret Service (USSS)
Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts Branch, FOIA Officer/
Public Liaison, 245 Murray Drive, Building 410, Washington, DC
20223, Phone: 202-406-6370, Fax: 202-406-5586, Email:
FOIA@usss.dhs.gov.
Please direct all requests for information from the Office of
the Secretary, Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman,
Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Office of the Executive
Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, Management
Directorate, Office of Policy, Office of the General Counsel, Office
of Health Affairs, Office of Legislative Affairs, Office of Public
Affairs and the Privacy Office, to the DHS Privacy Office at: The
Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray
Lane SW., STOP-0655, Washington, DC 20528-0655, Phone: 202-343-1743
or 866-431-0486, Fax: 202-343-4011, Email: foia@hq.dhs.gov.
Appendix B to Part 5--[Removed]
0
3. Remove appendix B to part 5.
[[Page 45115]]
Title 19--Customs Duties
PART 103--AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
0
4. The authority citation for part 103 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1624; 31
U.S.C. 9701.
Section 103.31 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1431; Section 103.31a
also issued under 19 U.S.C. 2071 note and 6 U.S.C. 943; Section
103.33 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1628; Section 103.34 also issued
under 18 U.S.C. 1905.
Sec. 103.35 [Removed]
0
5. Remove Sec. 103.35.
Title 44--Emergency Management and Assistance
PART 5--PRODUCTION OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
0
6. The authority citation for part 5 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subparts A Through E--[Removed and Reserved]
0
7. Remove and reserve subparts A through E of part 5.
0
8. In Sec. 5.86, revise the section to read as follows:
Sec. 5.86 Records involved in litigation or other judicial process.
Subpoenas duces tecum issued pursuant to litigation or any other
adjudicatory proceeding in which the United States is a party shall be
referred to the Chief Counsel.
Jeh Charles Johnson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-18388 Filed 7-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9L-P