Notice of Intent and Notice of Scoping Meetings for the Long-Term Recapture and Recirculation of San Joaquin River Restoration Program Flows Environmental Impact Statement, 44993-44995 [2015-18536]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Notices
Protests of the survey must be
filed before August 27, 2015 to be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Protests of the survey
should be sent to the Branch of
Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land
Management, 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings, Montana 59101–4669.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marvin Montoya, Cadastral Surveyor,
Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of
Land Management, 5001 Southgate
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101–4669,
telephone (406) 896–5124 or (406) 896–
5003, hmontoya@blm.gov. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These
surveys were executed at the request of
the Bureau of Land Management, Dillon
Field Office, and were necessary to
determine Federal interest lands.
The lands we surveyed are:
DATES:
Principal Meridian, Montana
T. 4 S., R. 8 W.
The plat only, in one sheet, representing
the dependent resurvey of a portion of the
subdivisional lines, Township 4 South,
Range 8 West, Principal Meridian, Montana,
was accepted May 18, 2015 and
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Principal Meridian, Montana
T. 2 S., R. 3 W.
The plat only, in one sheet, representing
the remonumentation of Corner No. 4 of
Mineral Survey No. 6594, Alice Lode,
Township 2 South, Range 3 West, Principal
Meridian, Montana, was accepted May 18,
2015.
We will place a copy of the plats only,
in two sheets, we described in the open
files. They will be available to the
public as a matter of information. If the
BLM receives a protest against these
surveys, as shown on these plats only,
in two sheets, prior to the date of the
official filing, we will stay the filing
pending our consideration of the
protest. We will not officially file these
plats only, in two sheets, until the day
after we have accepted or dismissed all
protests and they have become final,
including decisions or appeals.
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.
Joshua F. Alexander,
Acting Chief, Branch of Cadastral Survey,
Division of Energy, Minerals and Realty.
[FR Doc. 2015–18542 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–PWR–PWRO–18268; PPPWLAKES1/
PPMPSAS1Z.YP0000]
Record of Decision for Wilderness
Management Plan, Lake Mead National
Recreation Area, Nevada and Arizona
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service has
prepared and approved a Record of
Decision for the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the
Wilderness Management Plan for Lake
Mead National Recreation Area.
Approval of the Wilderness
Management Plan concludes an
extensive conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis effort
that began during 2006. The requisite
no-action ‘‘wait period’’ was initiated on
February 27, 2015, with the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Federal Register announcement of the
filing of the Final EIS.
ADDRESSES: Those wishing to review the
Record of Decision may obtain a copy
by request to the Superintendent, Lake
Mead National Recreation Area, 601
Nevada Way, Boulder City, Nevada
89005 or via telephone request at (702)
293–8978.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Holland, Senior Outdoor Recreation
Planner, (702) 293–8986.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Park Service (NPS), in
collaboration with the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), prepared the
Wilderness Management Plan (WMP),
which will guide management actions
in eight wilderness areas located in
Nevada, as follows: The Black Canyon,
Bridge Canyon, Jimbilnan, Nellis Wash,
and Pinto Valley areas (managed by
NPS), and the Eldorado, Ireteba Peaks,
and Spirit Mountain areas (jointly
managed by NPS and BLM). These areas
were designated wilderness in 2002
through the Clark County Conservation
of Public Land and Natural Resources
Act (Pub. L. 107–282).
The EIS process was jointly
conducted pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as amended) and
the regulations promulgated by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR 1505.2). The BLM has prepared a
separate Record of Decision for those
portions of the three wilderness areas
that it manages.
Three alternatives, all including
mitigation measures, were evaluated
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44993
during the EIS/WMP process. The
‘‘agency preferred’’ Alternative B has
been selected for implementation. The
approved WMP will preserve the
wilderness character, natural resources,
and cultural resources in the eight
designated wilderness areas within Lake
Mead National Recreation Area, while
also providing for the use and
enjoyment of the wilderness areas. The
WMP provides guidelines to NPS
wilderness managers for maintaining
desirable conditions in the wilderness
areas, and is intended to provide for
consistency and continuity for the
undertaking of future NPS and BLM
wilderness management activities and
programs. The WMP does not entail any
changes to the NPS or BLM wilderness
boundaries set forth in the Clark County
wilderness legislation. All primary
components of the selected alternative
will be implemented as NPS staffing
and funding allow.
Dated: May 27, 2015.
Patricia L. Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2015–18436 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR02013000, XXXR5537F3,
RX.19872100.1000000]
Notice of Intent and Notice of Scoping
Meetings for the Long-Term Recapture
and Recirculation of San Joaquin River
Restoration Program Flows
Environmental Impact Statement
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Reclamation
intends to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Longterm Recapture and Recirculation of San
Joaquin River Restoration Program
Flows. The San Joaquin River
Restoration Program is being
implemented pursuant to the
Stipulation of Settlement in NRDC, et
al. v. Kirk Rodgers, et al. (Settlement)
and the San Joaquin River Restoration
Settlement Act (SJRRS), Title X of
Public Law 111–11 (SJRRS Act). In
accordance with Paragraph 16(a) of the
Settlement and Section 10004(a)(4) of
the SJRRS Act, Reclamation intends to
develop and implement a long-term
plan for recirculation, recapture, reuse,
exchange or transfer of restoration flows
for the purpose of reducing or avoiding
impacts to water deliveries to all of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
44994
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Notices
participating Friant Division long-term
contractors.
Submit written comments on
scope of the EIS by August 27, 2015.
Reclamation will hold four scoping
meetings to solicit public input on
alternatives, concerns, and issues to be
addressed in the EIS:
1. Monday, August 10, 2015, 1 p.m. to
3:00 p.m., Sacramento, CA.
2. Tuesday, August 11, 2015, 6 p.m.
to 8 p.m., Tulare, CA.
3. Wednesday, August 12, 2015, 6
p.m. to 8 p.m., Fresno, CA.
4. Thursday, August 13, 2015, 6 p.m.
to 8 p.m., Los Banos, CA.
Oral and written comments will be
accepted during the scoping meetings.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Ms. Kellye Kennedy, Project Manager,
Bureau of Reclamation, SJRRP, 2800
Cottage Way, MP–170, Sacramento, CA
95825; or email at
recaptureandrecirculation@
restoresjr.net.
The four scoping meetings will be
held at the following locations:
1. Sacramento—Bureau of
Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Regional
Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento,
CA 95825.
2. Tulare—Tulare International
Agriculture Center, 4500 S. Laspina
Street, Tulare, CA 93274.
3. Fresno—Fresno Hotel and
Conference Center, 2233 Ventura Street,
Fresno, CA 93721.
4. Los Banos—College Greens Rental,
1815 Scripps Drive, Los Banos, CA
93635.
DATES:
Ms.
Kellye Kennedy at (916) 978–4640; TY
1–800–877–8339; or email at
kkennedy@usbr.gov. Additional
information is available online at
www.restoresjr.net.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Agencies Involved
Reclamation is the lead Federal
agency in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We
will invite the following agencies to
participate as cooperating agencies for
the preparation of the EIS in accordance
with NEPA:
• National Marine Fisheries Service
• Environmental Protection Agency
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• California Department of Water
Resources
• California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
• Local agencies (e.g., potentially
affected cities and reclamation
districts)
• Friant Water Authority
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Friant Division Long-Term Water
Contractors
• San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water
Authority
• San Joaquin River Exchange
Contractors Water Authority
II. Why We Are Taking This Action
In 1988, a coalition of environmental
groups, led by the Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC), filed a lawsuit
challenging the renewal of long-term
water service contracts between the
United States and Central Valley Project
Friant Division Long-Term Contractors
(Friant Contractors). After more than 18
years of litigation, NRDC, et al., v. Kirk
Rodgers, et al., a settlement was
reached. On September 13, 2006, the
Settling Parties, including NRDC, Friant
Water Users Authority (now represented
by the Friant Water Authority [FWA]),
and the U.S. Departments of the Interior
and Commerce, agreed on the terms and
conditions of the Settlement, which was
subsequently approved by the U.S.
Eastern District Court of California
(Court) on October 23, 2006. The
Settlement establishes two primary
goals:
1. Restoration Goal. To restore and
maintain fish populations in ‘‘good
condition’’ in the main stem of the San
Joaquin River below Friant Dam to the
confluence of the Merced River,
including naturally reproducing and
self-sustaining populations of salmon
and other fish.
2. Water Management Goal. To reduce
or avoid adverse water supply impacts
to all of the Friant Contractors that may
result from the interim flows and
restoration flows provided for in the
Settlement. The Settlement and SJRRS
Act identify the need for a plan for
recirculation, recapture, reuse, exchange
or transfer of restoration flows to reduce
or avoid impacts to Friant Contractors.
The SJRRP Program Environmental
Impact Statement/Impact Report (PEIS/
R) was finalized in July 2012 and the
corresponding Record of Decision (ROD)
was issued on September 28, 2012. The
PEIS/R and ROD analyzed at a projectlevel the reoperation of Friant Dam to
release restoration flows to the San
Joaquin River, making water supplies
available to Friant Contractors at a preestablished rate, and the recapture of
interim and restoration flows at existing
facilities within the restoration area (the
San Joaquin River and bypass channels
from Friant Dam to the Merced
confluence) and the Delta. The PEIS/R
and ROD also include program-level
actions, which are identified as actions
that may require the completion of
additional analysis pursuant to NEPA
and/or the California Environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Quality Act, as appropriate. One of the
program-level actions identified in the
PEIS/R and ROD is the recirculation of
recaptured restoration flows. This EIS
will analyze and disclose any impacts to
the human environment potentially
occurring from the proposed
alternatives beyond those already
analyzed and disclosed in the PEIS/R.
III. Purpose and Need for Action
As described in the PEIS/R, changes
to the operation of Friant Dam and
release of SJRRP flows in support of the
Restoration Goal have the potential to
adversely affect water deliveries to
Friant Contractors. As identified in the
Settlement and SJRRS Act, the Water
Management Goal includes a
requirement for the development and
implementation of a plan for
recirculation, recapture, reuse, exchange
or transfer of SJRRP flows for the
purpose of reducing or avoiding impacts
to water deliveries to all of the
participating Friant Contractors.
IV. Project Area
The study area may include
potentially affected recapture areas in
the SJRRP Restoration Area, the lower
San Joaquin River, and the Delta; the
Friant Service Area, recirculation
conveyance areas, and other State Water
Project and Central Valley Project
service areas potentially affected by
transfers or exchanges evaluated in the
EIS. The study area analyzed in the EIS
will be refined as the alternative
development process proceeds and
comments received during the public
scoping period will be considered.
V. Alternatives To Be Considered
Reclamation will develop a
reasonable range of alternatives for
analysis in the EIS based on previous
studies, public scoping and stakeholder
input. Both physical and operational
modifications may be included in efforts
to recapture and recirculate SJRRP
flows. Recirculation of water could
occur through the execution of direct
deliveries, transfers or exchanges
utilizing existing and expanded or new
facilities for conveyance. As described
in the PEIS/R, long-term recapture and
recirculation actions may include
modifications to existing facilities or the
construction of new facilities. The water
may be delivered directly back to the
Friant Contractors, or may be made
available to others through transfers,
exchanges or sales. Action alternatives
analyzed in the EIS could include
expansion or construction of new
facilities for the recapture of SJRRP
water, the direct delivery of SJRRP
water to Friant Contractors and, the
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Notices
exchange and/or transfer of recaptured
SJRRP flows among Friant Contractors
or between Friant and non-Friant
Contractors.
VI. Statutory Authority
Implementation of the Settlement,
including this proposed action, is
authorized by the San Joaquin River
Restoration Settlement Act, Title X of
Public Law 111–11, the Omnibus Public
Land Management Act of 2009. In
accordance with NEPA, Reclamation
will analyze in the EIS the potential
direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental effects that may result
from implementation of the proposed
action and alternatives, which may
include, but are not limited to, the
following areas of potential impact:
a. Water resources, including
groundwater;
b. Flood control;
c. Hydrology/water quality;
d. Biological resources, including fish,
wildlife, and plant species;
e. Land use, including agricultural
resources;
f. Cultural resources;
g. Air quality;
h. Power/energy and natural
resources;
i. Public services and utilities;
j. Hazards and hazardous materials;
k. Geology, soils, and mineral
resources;
l. Visual, scenic, or aesthetic
resources;
m. Socioeconomics;
n. Environmental justice;
o. Global climate change/greenhouse
gas emissions;
p. Indian trust assets;
q. Noise;
r. Population and housing;
s. Transportation; and
t. Recreation.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VII. Request for Comments
The purposes of this notice are:
• To advise other agencies,
potentially affected local governments,
tribes, and the public of our intention to
gather information to support the
preparation of an EIS;
• To obtain suggestions and
information from other agencies,
interested parties, and the public on the
scope of alternatives and issues to be
addressed in the EIS; and,
• To identify important issues raised
by the public related to the development
and implementation of the proposed
action.
We invite comments from interested
parties to ensure that the full range of
alternatives and issues related to the
development of the proposed action are
identified. Written comments may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
submitted by mail, electronic mail,
facsimile transmission or in person (see
ADDRESSES section). Comments and
participation in the scoping process are
encouraged.
VIII. Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
IX. How To Request Reasonable
Accommodation
If special assistance is required at one
of the scoping meetings, please contact
Reclamation’s Public Affairs Office at
(916) 978–5100 (TYY 1–800–877–8339)
at least five working days before the
meetings. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
Dated: July 14, 2015.
Pablo R. Arroyave
Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2015–18536 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1140–0079]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Transactions
Among Licensees/Permittees and
Transactions Among Licensees and
Holders of User Permits
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in 80 FR 29748 on
May 22, 2015, allowing for a 60-day
comment period.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44995
The purpose of this notice is to
allow for an additional 30 days for
public comment until August 27, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments, especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Anita Scheddel at eipbinformationcollection@atf.gov. Written
comments and/or suggestions can also
be directed to the Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention
Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Washington DC 20503 or send email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
DATES:
Overview of This Information
Collection 1140–0079
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of an existing collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Transactions Among Licensees/
Permittees and Transactions Among
Licensees and Holders of User Permits.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form number: None.
Component: Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44993-44995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18536]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR02013000, XXXR5537F3, RX.19872100.1000000]
Notice of Intent and Notice of Scoping Meetings for the Long-Term
Recapture and Recirculation of San Joaquin River Restoration Program
Flows Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation intends to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Long-term Recapture and Recirculation of
San Joaquin River Restoration Program Flows. The San Joaquin River
Restoration Program is being implemented pursuant to the Stipulation of
Settlement in NRDC, et al. v. Kirk Rodgers, et al. (Settlement) and the
San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act (SJRRS), Title X of Public
Law 111-11 (SJRRS Act). In accordance with Paragraph 16(a) of the
Settlement and Section 10004(a)(4) of the SJRRS Act, Reclamation
intends to develop and implement a long-term plan for recirculation,
recapture, reuse, exchange or transfer of restoration flows for the
purpose of reducing or avoiding impacts to water deliveries to all of
the
[[Page 44994]]
participating Friant Division long-term contractors.
DATES: Submit written comments on scope of the EIS by August 27, 2015.
Reclamation will hold four scoping meetings to solicit public input
on alternatives, concerns, and issues to be addressed in the EIS:
1. Monday, August 10, 2015, 1 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., Sacramento, CA.
2. Tuesday, August 11, 2015, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Tulare, CA.
3. Wednesday, August 12, 2015, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Fresno, CA.
4. Thursday, August 13, 2015, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Los Banos, CA.
Oral and written comments will be accepted during the scoping
meetings.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Ms. Kellye Kennedy, Project
Manager, Bureau of Reclamation, SJRRP, 2800 Cottage Way, MP-170,
Sacramento, CA 95825; or email at
recaptureandrecirculation@restoresjr.net.
The four scoping meetings will be held at the following locations:
1. Sacramento--Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Regional Office,
2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825.
2. Tulare--Tulare International Agriculture Center, 4500 S. Laspina
Street, Tulare, CA 93274.
3. Fresno--Fresno Hotel and Conference Center, 2233 Ventura Street,
Fresno, CA 93721.
4. Los Banos--College Greens Rental, 1815 Scripps Drive, Los Banos,
CA 93635.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kellye Kennedy at (916) 978-4640;
TY 1-800-877-8339; or email at kkennedy@usbr.gov. Additional
information is available online at www.restoresjr.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Agencies Involved
Reclamation is the lead Federal agency in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We will invite the following
agencies to participate as cooperating agencies for the preparation of
the EIS in accordance with NEPA:
National Marine Fisheries Service
Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
California Department of Water Resources
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Local agencies (e.g., potentially affected cities and
reclamation districts)
Friant Water Authority
Friant Division Long-Term Water Contractors
San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority
San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority
II. Why We Are Taking This Action
In 1988, a coalition of environmental groups, led by the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC), filed a lawsuit challenging the
renewal of long-term water service contracts between the United States
and Central Valley Project Friant Division Long-Term Contractors
(Friant Contractors). After more than 18 years of litigation, NRDC, et
al., v. Kirk Rodgers, et al., a settlement was reached. On September
13, 2006, the Settling Parties, including NRDC, Friant Water Users
Authority (now represented by the Friant Water Authority [FWA]), and
the U.S. Departments of the Interior and Commerce, agreed on the terms
and conditions of the Settlement, which was subsequently approved by
the U.S. Eastern District Court of California (Court) on October 23,
2006. The Settlement establishes two primary goals:
1. Restoration Goal. To restore and maintain fish populations in
``good condition'' in the main stem of the San Joaquin River below
Friant Dam to the confluence of the Merced River, including naturally
reproducing and self-sustaining populations of salmon and other fish.
2. Water Management Goal. To reduce or avoid adverse water supply
impacts to all of the Friant Contractors that may result from the
interim flows and restoration flows provided for in the Settlement. The
Settlement and SJRRS Act identify the need for a plan for
recirculation, recapture, reuse, exchange or transfer of restoration
flows to reduce or avoid impacts to Friant Contractors. The SJRRP
Program Environmental Impact Statement/Impact Report (PEIS/R) was
finalized in July 2012 and the corresponding Record of Decision (ROD)
was issued on September 28, 2012. The PEIS/R and ROD analyzed at a
project-level the reoperation of Friant Dam to release restoration
flows to the San Joaquin River, making water supplies available to
Friant Contractors at a pre-established rate, and the recapture of
interim and restoration flows at existing facilities within the
restoration area (the San Joaquin River and bypass channels from Friant
Dam to the Merced confluence) and the Delta. The PEIS/R and ROD also
include program-level actions, which are identified as actions that may
require the completion of additional analysis pursuant to NEPA and/or
the California Environmental Quality Act, as appropriate. One of the
program-level actions identified in the PEIS/R and ROD is the
recirculation of recaptured restoration flows. This EIS will analyze
and disclose any impacts to the human environment potentially occurring
from the proposed alternatives beyond those already analyzed and
disclosed in the PEIS/R.
III. Purpose and Need for Action
As described in the PEIS/R, changes to the operation of Friant Dam
and release of SJRRP flows in support of the Restoration Goal have the
potential to adversely affect water deliveries to Friant Contractors.
As identified in the Settlement and SJRRS Act, the Water Management
Goal includes a requirement for the development and implementation of a
plan for recirculation, recapture, reuse, exchange or transfer of SJRRP
flows for the purpose of reducing or avoiding impacts to water
deliveries to all of the participating Friant Contractors.
IV. Project Area
The study area may include potentially affected recapture areas in
the SJRRP Restoration Area, the lower San Joaquin River, and the Delta;
the Friant Service Area, recirculation conveyance areas, and other
State Water Project and Central Valley Project service areas
potentially affected by transfers or exchanges evaluated in the EIS.
The study area analyzed in the EIS will be refined as the alternative
development process proceeds and comments received during the public
scoping period will be considered.
V. Alternatives To Be Considered
Reclamation will develop a reasonable range of alternatives for
analysis in the EIS based on previous studies, public scoping and
stakeholder input. Both physical and operational modifications may be
included in efforts to recapture and recirculate SJRRP flows.
Recirculation of water could occur through the execution of direct
deliveries, transfers or exchanges utilizing existing and expanded or
new facilities for conveyance. As described in the PEIS/R, long-term
recapture and recirculation actions may include modifications to
existing facilities or the construction of new facilities. The water
may be delivered directly back to the Friant Contractors, or may be
made available to others through transfers, exchanges or sales. Action
alternatives analyzed in the EIS could include expansion or
construction of new facilities for the recapture of SJRRP water, the
direct delivery of SJRRP water to Friant Contractors and, the
[[Page 44995]]
exchange and/or transfer of recaptured SJRRP flows among Friant
Contractors or between Friant and non-Friant Contractors.
VI. Statutory Authority
Implementation of the Settlement, including this proposed action,
is authorized by the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act,
Title X of Public Law 111-11, the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of
2009. In accordance with NEPA, Reclamation will analyze in the EIS the
potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects that
may result from implementation of the proposed action and alternatives,
which may include, but are not limited to, the following areas of
potential impact:
a. Water resources, including groundwater;
b. Flood control;
c. Hydrology/water quality;
d. Biological resources, including fish, wildlife, and plant
species;
e. Land use, including agricultural resources;
f. Cultural resources;
g. Air quality;
h. Power/energy and natural resources;
i. Public services and utilities;
j. Hazards and hazardous materials;
k. Geology, soils, and mineral resources;
l. Visual, scenic, or aesthetic resources;
m. Socioeconomics;
n. Environmental justice;
o. Global climate change/greenhouse gas emissions;
p. Indian trust assets;
q. Noise;
r. Population and housing;
s. Transportation; and
t. Recreation.
VII. Request for Comments
The purposes of this notice are:
To advise other agencies, potentially affected local
governments, tribes, and the public of our intention to gather
information to support the preparation of an EIS;
To obtain suggestions and information from other agencies,
interested parties, and the public on the scope of alternatives and
issues to be addressed in the EIS; and,
To identify important issues raised by the public related
to the development and implementation of the proposed action.
We invite comments from interested parties to ensure that the full
range of alternatives and issues related to the development of the
proposed action are identified. Written comments may be submitted by
mail, electronic mail, facsimile transmission or in person (see
ADDRESSES section). Comments and participation in the scoping process
are encouraged.
VIII. Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone number, email address or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
IX. How To Request Reasonable Accommodation
If special assistance is required at one of the scoping meetings,
please contact Reclamation's Public Affairs Office at (916) 978-5100
(TYY 1-800-877-8339) at least five working days before the meetings.
Information regarding this proposed action is available in alternative
formats upon request.
Dated: July 14, 2015.
Pablo R. Arroyave
Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-18536 Filed 7-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P