Western and Central Pacific Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species; 2015 Bigeye Tuna Longline Fishery Closure, 44883-44884 [2015-18433]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
compliance year is generally based on
the positive difference, if any, between
the unit’s emissions ‘‘during such
control period’’ (that is, the control
period in the compliance year) and the
unit’s first-round NUSA allocation for
the compliance year.2 A ‘‘control
period’’ is defined as either a calendar
year or a May-September period—for
the SO2 and NOX annual programs and
for the NOX ozone season program,
respectively—subject in both cases to an
exclusion, for any given unit, of periods
before the unit’s monitor certification
deadline, thereby ensuring that the
unit’s ‘‘control periods’’ generally
represent the periods for which the unit
must hold CSAPR allowances equal to
its emissions.3 The emissions data used
in calculating NUSA allowance
allocations under the CSAPR FIPs thus
properly exclude any emissions
occurring before a unit’s monitor
certification deadline because such
emissions are not emissions ‘‘during the
immediately preceding control period’’
or ‘‘during such control period.’’ 4
EPA excluded emissions before units’
monitor certification deadlines from the
preliminary calculations of first-round
2015 NUSA allowance allocations
discussed in the June 1 NODA. In the
final calculations, EPA has likewise
excluded emissions before units’
monitor certification deadlines and has
made no other changes to the data used
in the preliminary calculations. The
final first-round 2015 NUSA allowance
allocations are therefore unchanged
from the preliminary calculations.
The final unit-by-unit data and
allowance allocation calculations are set
forth in Excel spreadsheets titled
‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2015_NOx_Annual_
1st_Round_Final_Data’’, ‘‘CSAPR_
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2 40
CFR 97.412(a)(9)(i), 97.512(a)(9)(i),
97.612(a)(9)(i), and 97.712(a)(9)(i). Second-round
NUSA allocations occur only if all NUSA
allowances were not allocated in the first round and
may be affected by second-round NUSA oversubscription and rounding.
3 40 CFR 97.402, 97.502, 97.602, and 97.702
(definitions of ‘‘control period’’); see also 40 CFR
97.406(c)(3), 97.506(c)(3), 97.606(c)(3), and
97.706(c)(3) (exclusion of periods before monitor
certification deadline).
4 The CSAPR regulations’ exclusion of periods
before a unit’s monitor certification deadline from
‘‘control periods’’ is explicit with respect to control
periods in and after 2015, the first year of
obligations to hold CSAPR allowances. The
regulations’ only operative references to control
periods before 2015 are the references in the NUSA
allowance allocation provisions to ‘‘the
immediately preceding control period,’’ which, in
the context of the 2015 compliance year, indicate
2014 ‘‘control periods.’’ EPA interprets the NUSA
provisions as intended to operate in the same
manner in all compliance years and accordingly
interprets the exclusion of periods before a unit’s
monitor certification deadline as applying to all
control periods, including the 2014 ‘‘control
periods.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
NUSA_2015_NOx_OS_1st_Round_
Final_Data’’, and ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2015_
SO2_1st_Round_Final_Data,’’ available
on EPA’s Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/crossstaterule/
actions.html. The three spreadsheets
show EPA’s final determinations of firstround 2015 NUSA allocations under the
CSAPR NOX annual, NOX ozone season,
and SO2 (Group 1 and Group 2) trading
programs, respectively.
Pursuant to CSAPR’s allowance
recordation timing requirements, the
allocated NUSA allowances will be
recorded in sources’ AMS accounts by
August 1, 2015. EPA notes that an
allocation or lack of allocation of
allowances to a given unit does not
constitute a determination that CSAPR
does or does not apply to the unit. EPA
also notes that NUSA allocations are
subject to potential correction if a unit
to which NUSA allowances have been
allocated for a given compliance year is
not actually an affected unit as of
January 1 (or May 1 in the case of the
NOX ozone season program) of the
compliance year.5
(Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b),
97.611(b), and 97.711(b).)
Dated: July 20, 2015.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–18516 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 150619537–5615–01]
RIN 0648–XE037
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries
for Highly Migratory Species; 2015
Bigeye Tuna Longline Fishery Closure
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; fishery closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS is closing the U.S.
pelagic longline fishery for bigeye tuna
in the western and central Pacific Ocean
as a result of the fishery reaching the
2015 catch limit. This action is
necessary to prevent additional fishing
pressure on this fish stock.
DATES: Effective August 5, 2015, through
December 31, 2015.
SUMMARY:
5 See 40 CFR 97.411(c), 97.511(c), 97.611(c), and
97.711(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44883
Tom
Graham, NMFS Pacific Islands Region,
808–725–5032.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pelagic
longline fishing in the western and
central Pacific Ocean is managed, in
part, under the Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries Convention
Implementation Act (Act). Regulations
governing fishing by U.S. vessels in
accordance with the Act appear at 50
CFR part 300, subpart O.
NMFS established a calendar year
2015 limit of 3,502 metric tons (mt) of
bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) that may
be caught and retained in the U.S.
pelagic longline fishery in the area of
application of the Convention on the
Conservation and Management of
Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the
Western and Central Pacific Ocean
(Convention Area) (80 FR 43634, July
23, 2015; 50 CFR 300.224). NMFS
monitored the retained catches of bigeye
tuna using logbook data submitted by
vessel captains and other available
information, and determined that the
2015 catch limit would be reached by
August 5, 2015. In accordance with 50
CFR 300.224(e), this rule serves as
advance notification to fishermen, the
fishing industry, and the general public
that the U.S. longline fishery for bigeye
tuna in the Convention Area will be
closed during the dates provided in the
DATES heading. The fishery is scheduled
to reopen on January 1, 2016. This rule
does not apply to the longline fisheries
of American Samoa, Guam, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, collectively ‘‘the territories,’’ as
described below.
During the closure, a U.S. fishing
vessel may not retain on board,
transship, or land bigeye tuna captured
by longline gear in the Convention Area,
except that any bigeye tuna already on
board a fishing vessel upon the effective
date of the restrictions may be retained
on board, transshipped, and landed,
provided that they are landed within 14
days of the start of the closure, that is,
by August 19, 2015. This 14-day landing
requirement does not apply to a vessel
that has declared to NMFS, pursuant to
50 CFR 665.803(a), that the current trip
type is shallow-setting.
Longline-caught bigeye tuna may be
retained on board, transshipped, and
landed if the fish are caught by a vessel
with a valid American Samoa longline
permit, or landed in the territories. In
either case, the following conditions
must be met:
(1) The fish is not caught in the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) around
Hawaii;
(2) Other applicable laws and
regulations are followed; and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
44884
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The vessel has a valid permit
issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or
665.801.
Bigeye tuna caught by longline gear
during the closure may also be retained
on board, transshipped, and/or landed if
they are caught by a vessel that is
included in a specified fishing
agreement under 50 CFR 665.819(d), in
accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(f)(iv).
During the closure, a U.S. vessel is
also prohibited from transshipping
bigeye tuna caught in the Convention
Area by longline gear to any vessel other
than a U.S. fishing vessel with a valid
permit issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or
665.801.
The catch limit and this closure do
not apply to bigeye tuna caught by
longline gear outside the Convention
Area, such as in the eastern Pacific
Ocean. To ensure compliance with the
restrictions related to bigeye tuna caught
by longline gear in the Convention Area,
however, the following requirements
apply during the closure period:
(1) Longline fishing both inside and
outside the Convention Area is not
allowed during the same fishing trip. An
exception would be a fishing trip that is
in progress on August 5, 2015. In that
case, the catch of bigeye tuna must be
landed by August 19, 2015; and
(2) If a longline vessel fishes outside
the Convention Area and the vessel then
enters the Convention Area during the
same fishing trip, the fishing gear must
be stowed and not readily available for
fishing in the Convention Area.
Specifically, hooks, branch lines, and
floats must be stowed and the mainline
hauler must be covered.
The above two additional prohibitions
do not apply to the following vessels:
(1) Vessels on declared shallowsetting trips pursuant to 50 CFR
665.803(a); and
(2) Vessels operating in the longline
fisheries of the territories. This includes
vessels included in a specified fishing
agreement under 50 CFR 665.819(d), in
accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(f)(iv).
This group also includes vessels with
valid American Samoa longline permits
and vessels landing bigeye tuna in one
of the territories, as long as the bigeye
tuna were not caught in the EEZ around
Hawaii, the fishing was compliant with
all applicable laws, and the vessel has
a valid permit issued under 50 CFR
660.707 or 665.801.
the western and central Pacific as a
result of reaching the applicable bigeye
tuna catch limit. The limit is codified in
Federal regulations and is based on
agreed limits established by the Western
and Central Pacific Fisheries
Commission. NMFS forecasts that the
fishery will reach the 2015 limit by
August 5, 2015. Although this is much
earlier than in previous years, longline
fishermen have been subject to longline
bigeye tuna limits in the western and
central Pacific since 2009. They have
received ongoing, updated information
about the 2015 catch and progress of the
fishery in reaching the Convention Area
limit via the NMFS Web site, social
media, and other means. This
constitutes adequate advance notice of
this fishery closure. Additionally, the
publication timing of this rule provides
longline fishermen with seven days’
advance notice of the closure date, and
allows two weeks to return to port and
land their catch of bigeye tuna.
For the reasons stated above, there is
also good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)
to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness for this temporary rule.
NMFS must close the fishery as soon as
possible to ensure that fishery does not
exceed the catch limit. According to
NMFS stock-status-determination
criteria, bigeye tuna in the Pacific Ocean
are currently experiencing overfishing.
NMFS implemented the catch limit to
reduce the effects of fishing on bigeye
tuna and restore the stock to levels
capable of producing maximum
sustainable yield on a continuing basis.
Failure to close the fishery immediately
would result in additional fishing
pressure on this stock, in violation of
Federal law and international
obligations.
This action is required by 50 CFR
300.224 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
Dated: July 23, 2015.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–18433 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Classification
There is good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) to waive prior notice and the
opportunity for public comment on this
action, because it would be contrary to
the public interest. This rule closes the
U.S. longline fishery for bigeye tuna in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 120627194–3657–02]
RIN 0648–XE005
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
North Atlantic Swordfish Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; Swordfish
General Commercial permit retention
limit adjustment for Northwest Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean
regions.
AGENCY:
NMFS is adjusting the
Swordfish (SWO) General Commercial
permit retention limits for the
Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and
U.S. Caribbean regions for the
remainder of 2015, unless otherwise
noticed. The SWO General Commercial
permit retention limit in each of these
three regions is increased to six SWO
per vessel per trip. The SWO General
Commercial permit retention limit in
the Florida SWO Management Area will
remain unchanged at zero SWO per
vessel per trip. This adjustment applies
to SWO General Commercial permitted
vessels and HMS Charter/Headboat
permitted vessels when on a non-forhire trip. This action is based upon
consideration of the applicable inseason
regional retention limit adjustment
criteria.
SUMMARY:
The adjusted SWO General
Commercial permit retention limits in
the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and U.S. Caribbean regions are effective
July 30, 2015 through December 31,
2015.
DATES:
Rick
Pearson or Randy Blankinship, 727–
824–5399.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations implemented under the
authority of the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA; 16 U.S.C. 971 et
seq.) and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.) governing the harvest of North
Atlantic SWO by persons and vessels
subject to U.S. jurisdiction are found at
50 CFR part 635. Section 635.27
subdivides the U.S. North Atlantic SWO
quota recommended by the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44883-44884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18433]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 150619537-5615-01]
RIN 0648-XE037
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries for Highly Migratory
Species; 2015 Bigeye Tuna Longline Fishery Closure
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; fishery closure.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the U.S. pelagic longline fishery for bigeye
tuna in the western and central Pacific Ocean as a result of the
fishery reaching the 2015 catch limit. This action is necessary to
prevent additional fishing pressure on this fish stock.
DATES: Effective August 5, 2015, through December 31, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Graham, NMFS Pacific Islands
Region, 808-725-5032.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pelagic longline fishing in the western and
central Pacific Ocean is managed, in part, under the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act (Act).
Regulations governing fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance with the
Act appear at 50 CFR part 300, subpart O.
NMFS established a calendar year 2015 limit of 3,502 metric tons
(mt) of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) that may be caught and retained in
the U.S. pelagic longline fishery in the area of application of the
Convention on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish
Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (Convention Area) (80
FR 43634, July 23, 2015; 50 CFR 300.224). NMFS monitored the retained
catches of bigeye tuna using logbook data submitted by vessel captains
and other available information, and determined that the 2015 catch
limit would be reached by August 5, 2015. In accordance with 50 CFR
300.224(e), this rule serves as advance notification to fishermen, the
fishing industry, and the general public that the U.S. longline fishery
for bigeye tuna in the Convention Area will be closed during the dates
provided in the DATES heading. The fishery is scheduled to reopen on
January 1, 2016. This rule does not apply to the longline fisheries of
American Samoa, Guam, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, collectively ``the territories,'' as described below.
During the closure, a U.S. fishing vessel may not retain on board,
transship, or land bigeye tuna captured by longline gear in the
Convention Area, except that any bigeye tuna already on board a fishing
vessel upon the effective date of the restrictions may be retained on
board, transshipped, and landed, provided that they are landed within
14 days of the start of the closure, that is, by August 19, 2015. This
14-day landing requirement does not apply to a vessel that has declared
to NMFS, pursuant to 50 CFR 665.803(a), that the current trip type is
shallow-setting.
Longline-caught bigeye tuna may be retained on board, transshipped,
and landed if the fish are caught by a vessel with a valid American
Samoa longline permit, or landed in the territories. In either case,
the following conditions must be met:
(1) The fish is not caught in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone
(EEZ) around Hawaii;
(2) Other applicable laws and regulations are followed; and
[[Page 44884]]
(3) The vessel has a valid permit issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or
665.801.
Bigeye tuna caught by longline gear during the closure may also be
retained on board, transshipped, and/or landed if they are caught by a
vessel that is included in a specified fishing agreement under 50 CFR
665.819(d), in accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(f)(iv).
During the closure, a U.S. vessel is also prohibited from
transshipping bigeye tuna caught in the Convention Area by longline
gear to any vessel other than a U.S. fishing vessel with a valid permit
issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or 665.801.
The catch limit and this closure do not apply to bigeye tuna caught
by longline gear outside the Convention Area, such as in the eastern
Pacific Ocean. To ensure compliance with the restrictions related to
bigeye tuna caught by longline gear in the Convention Area, however,
the following requirements apply during the closure period:
(1) Longline fishing both inside and outside the Convention Area is
not allowed during the same fishing trip. An exception would be a
fishing trip that is in progress on August 5, 2015. In that case, the
catch of bigeye tuna must be landed by August 19, 2015; and
(2) If a longline vessel fishes outside the Convention Area and the
vessel then enters the Convention Area during the same fishing trip,
the fishing gear must be stowed and not readily available for fishing
in the Convention Area. Specifically, hooks, branch lines, and floats
must be stowed and the mainline hauler must be covered.
The above two additional prohibitions do not apply to the following
vessels:
(1) Vessels on declared shallow-setting trips pursuant to 50 CFR
665.803(a); and
(2) Vessels operating in the longline fisheries of the territories.
This includes vessels included in a specified fishing agreement under
50 CFR 665.819(d), in accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(f)(iv). This group
also includes vessels with valid American Samoa longline permits and
vessels landing bigeye tuna in one of the territories, as long as the
bigeye tuna were not caught in the EEZ around Hawaii, the fishing was
compliant with all applicable laws, and the vessel has a valid permit
issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or 665.801.
Classification
There is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive prior notice
and the opportunity for public comment on this action, because it would
be contrary to the public interest. This rule closes the U.S. longline
fishery for bigeye tuna in the western and central Pacific as a result
of reaching the applicable bigeye tuna catch limit. The limit is
codified in Federal regulations and is based on agreed limits
established by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission.
NMFS forecasts that the fishery will reach the 2015 limit by August 5,
2015. Although this is much earlier than in previous years, longline
fishermen have been subject to longline bigeye tuna limits in the
western and central Pacific since 2009. They have received ongoing,
updated information about the 2015 catch and progress of the fishery in
reaching the Convention Area limit via the NMFS Web site, social media,
and other means. This constitutes adequate advance notice of this
fishery closure. Additionally, the publication timing of this rule
provides longline fishermen with seven days' advance notice of the
closure date, and allows two weeks to return to port and land their
catch of bigeye tuna.
For the reasons stated above, there is also good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness for this
temporary rule. NMFS must close the fishery as soon as possible to
ensure that fishery does not exceed the catch limit. According to NMFS
stock-status-determination criteria, bigeye tuna in the Pacific Ocean
are currently experiencing overfishing. NMFS implemented the catch
limit to reduce the effects of fishing on bigeye tuna and restore the
stock to levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield on a
continuing basis. Failure to close the fishery immediately would result
in additional fishing pressure on this stock, in violation of Federal
law and international obligations.
This action is required by 50 CFR 300.224 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
Dated: July 23, 2015.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-18433 Filed 7-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P