Information Collection: Request for Information Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Event, 45005-45006 [2015-18408]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Larry W. Camper,
Director, Division of Decommissioning,
Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6258; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2015–18474 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
A. Obtaining Information
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2015–0043]
Information Collection: Request for
Information Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of
the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Event
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Renewal of existing information
collection; request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) invites public
comment on the renewal of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for an existing collection of
information. The information collection
is entitled, ‘‘Request for Information
Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3,
and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force
Review of Insights from the Fukushima
Dai-ichi Event.’’
DATES: Submit comments by September
28, 2015. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the Commission is able to
ensure consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0043. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Tremaine
Donnell, Office of Information Services,
Mail Stop: T–5 F53, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tremaine Donnell, Office of Information
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–
0043 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0043. A copy
of the collection of information and
related instructions may be obtained
without charge by accessing Docket ID
NRC–2015–0043 on this Web site.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. A copy
of the collection of information and
related instructions may be obtained
without charge by accessing ADAMS
Accession No. ML12053A340. The
supporting statement and burden
estimates are available in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML15128A589 and
ML15128A602.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of
the collection of information and related
instructions may be obtained without
charge by contacting NRC’s Clearance
Officer, Tremaine Donnell, Office of
Information Services, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
6258; email: INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@
NRC.GOV.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2015–
0043 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure
that the NRC is able to make your
comment submission available to the
public in this docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45005
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information in
comment submissions that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will
post all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as
enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS, and the NRC does not
routinely edit comment submissions to
remove identifying or contact
information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the NRC is requesting
public comment on its intention to
request the OMB’s approval for the
information collection summarized
below.
1. The title of the information
collection: Request for Information
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of
the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Event.
2. OMB approval number: 3150–0211.
3. Type of submission: Extension.
4. The form number, if applicable:
Not applicable.
5. How often the collection is required
or requested: Once.
6. Who will be required or asked to
respond: 99 power reactor licensees, 1
reactor in the process of resuming
licensing, and 2 Combined License
holders (2 units each).
7. The estimated number of annual
responses: 124.
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 104.
9. The estimated number of hours
needed annually to comply with the
information collection requirement or
request: 205,902.
10. Abstract: Following events at the
Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant
resulting from the March 11, 2011,
earthquake and subsequent tsunami,
and in response to requirements
contained in section 402 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub.
L. 112–074), the NRC requested
information from power reactor
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
45006
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Notices
licensees pursuant to title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations part
50.54(f). The information requested
includes seismic and flooding hazard
reevaluations to determine if further
regulatory action is necessary,
walkdowns to confirm compliance with
the current licensing basis and provide
input to the hazard reevaluations, and
analysis of the Emergency Preparedness
capability with respect to staffing and
communication ability during a
prolonged multiunit event. The NRC
will use the information provided by
licensees to determine if additional
regulatory action is necessary.
III. Specific Requests for Comments
The NRC is seeking comments that
address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the
information collection accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection on respondents
be minimized, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology?
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of July 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine U. Donnell,
Senior Specialist, FOIA, Privacy, and
Information Collection Branch, Customer
Service Division, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–18408 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–18426 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Table of Contents
[Release No. 34–75513; File No. SR–C2–
2015–018]
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Commission Action
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On July 20, 2015, the Postal Service
filed notice that it has entered into an
additional Global Reseller Expedited
Package Contracts 2 (GREP 2) negotiated
service agreement (Agreement).1
To support its Notice, the Postal
Service filed a copy of the Agreement,
a copy of the Governors’ Decision
authorizing the product, a certification
of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a),
and an application for non-public
treatment of certain materials. It also
filed supporting financial workpapers.
II. Notice of Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2015–106 for consideration of
matters raised by the Notice.
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s filing is
consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or
3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 CFR
part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due
no later than July 29, 2015. The public
portions of the filing can be accessed via
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Lyudmila
Y. Bzhilyanskaya to serve as Public
Representative in this docket.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Exchange Rules
Related to Obvious Errors
July 23, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 15,
2015, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange seeks to amend its rules
related to obvious errors. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided
below.
(additions are italicized; deletions are
[bracketed])
*
*
*
*
*
C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated Rules
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
III. Ordering Paragraphs
[Docket No. CP2015–106; Order No. 2603]
*
Rule 6.15 Nullification and Adjustment of
Options Transactions Including Obvious
Errors
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing concerning
an additional Global Reseller Expedited
Package Contracts 2 negotiated service
agreement. This notice informs the
public of the filing, invites public
comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: July 29,
2015.
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2015–106 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Postal Service’s
Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505,
Lyudmila Y. Bzhilyanskaya is appointed
to serve as an officer of the Commission
to represent the interests of the general
public in this proceeding (Public
Representative).
3. Comments are due no later than
July 29, 2015.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
a Functionally Equivalent Global Reseller
Expedited Package 2 Negotiated Service Agreement,
July 20, 2015 (Notice).
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jul 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.06 Verifiable Disruptions or Malfunctions
of Exchange Systems: Electronic transactions
arising out of a ‘‘verifiable disruption or
malfunction’’ in the use or operation of any
Exchange automated quotation,
dissemination, execution, or communication
system will either be nullified or adjusted by
an Official. Transactions that qualify for
price adjustment will be adjusted to
Theoretical Price, as defined in paragraph (b)
above.
*
*
*
*
*
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s Web
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45005-45006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18408]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2015-0043]
Information Collection: Request for Information Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Event
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Renewal of existing information collection; request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public
comment on the renewal of Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for an existing collection of information. The information
collection is entitled, ``Request for Information Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Event.''
DATES: Submit comments by September 28, 2015. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the
Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received
on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0043. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: Tremaine Donnell, Office of Information
Services, Mail Stop: T-5 F53, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tremaine Donnell, Office of
Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6258; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0043 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0043. A copy of
the collection of information and related instructions may be obtained
without charge by accessing Docket ID NRC-2015-0043 on this Web site.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. A
copy of the collection of information and related instructions may be
obtained without charge by accessing ADAMS Accession No. ML12053A340.
The supporting statement and burden estimates are available in ADAMS
under Accession Nos. ML15128A589 and ML15128A602.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
NRC's Clearance Officer: A copy of the collection of
information and related instructions may be obtained without charge by
contacting NRC's Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell, Office of
Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6258; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0043 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment
submissions into ADAMS, and the NRC does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the NRC is requesting public comment on its intention to
request the OMB's approval for the information collection summarized
below.
1. The title of the information collection: Request for Information
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3
of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-
ichi Event.
2. OMB approval number: 3150-0211.
3. Type of submission: Extension.
4. The form number, if applicable: Not applicable.
5. How often the collection is required or requested: Once.
6. Who will be required or asked to respond: 99 power reactor
licensees, 1 reactor in the process of resuming licensing, and 2
Combined License holders (2 units each).
7. The estimated number of annual responses: 124.
8. The estimated number of annual respondents: 104.
9. The estimated number of hours needed annually to comply with the
information collection requirement or request: 205,902.
10. Abstract: Following events at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear
power plant resulting from the March 11, 2011, earthquake and
subsequent tsunami, and in response to requirements contained in
section 402 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 112-074),
the NRC requested information from power reactor
[[Page 45006]]
licensees pursuant to title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations part
50.54(f). The information requested includes seismic and flooding
hazard reevaluations to determine if further regulatory action is
necessary, walkdowns to confirm compliance with the current licensing
basis and provide input to the hazard reevaluations, and analysis of
the Emergency Preparedness capability with respect to staffing and
communication ability during a prolonged multiunit event. The NRC will
use the information provided by licensees to determine if additional
regulatory action is necessary.
III. Specific Requests for Comments
The NRC is seeking comments that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC
to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical
utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the information collection
accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the information collection on respondents
be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology?
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of July 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine U. Donnell,
Senior Specialist, FOIA, Privacy, and Information Collection Branch,
Customer Service Division, Office of Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-18408 Filed 7-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P