Revision to Management Measures for the Subsistence Taking of Northern Fur Seals on St. Paul Island, Alaska, 44057-44060 [2015-18176]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
marine mammals and implement
shutdown or delay procedures when
applicable through communication with
the equipment operator.
(g) The Navy shall use soft start
techniques recommended by NMFS for
vibratory pile driving. Soft start for
vibratory drivers requires contractors to
initiate sound for fifteen seconds at
reduced energy followed by a thirtysecond waiting period. This procedure
is repeated two additional times. Soft
start shall be implemented at the start of
each day’s pile driving and at any time
following cessation of pile driving for a
period of thirty minutes or longer.
(h) Pile driving shall only be
conducted during daylight hours.
5. Monitoring.
The holder of this Authorization is
required to conduct marine mammal
monitoring during pile driving activity.
Marine mammal monitoring and
reporting shall be conducted in
accordance with the Monitoring Plan.
(a) The Navy shall collect sighting
data and behavioral responses to pile
driving for marine mammal species
observed in the region of activity during
the period of activity. All observers
shall be trained in marine mammal
identification and behaviors, and shall
have no other construction-related tasks
while conducting monitoring.
(b) For all marine mammal
monitoring, the information shall be
recorded as described in the Monitoring
Plan.
6. Reporting.
The holder of this Authorization is
required to:
(a) Submit a draft report on all
monitoring conducted under the IHA
within 45 days of the completion of
marine mammal and acoustic
monitoring, or sixty days prior to the
issuance of any subsequent IHA for this
project, whichever comes first. A final
report shall be prepared and submitted
within thirty days following resolution
of comments on the draft report from
NMFS. This report must contain the
informational elements described in the
Monitoring Plan, at minimum (see
attached), and shall also include:
i. Detailed information about any
implementation of shutdowns,
including the distance of animals to the
pile and description of specific actions
that ensued and resulting behavior of
the animal, if any.
ii. Description of attempts to
distinguish between the number of
individual animals taken and the
number of incidences of take, such as
ability to track groups or individuals.
iii. A refined take estimate based on
the number of marine mammals
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
observed during the course of
construction activities.
(b) Reporting injured or dead marine
mammals:
i. In the unanticipated event that the
specified activity clearly causes the take
of a marine mammal in a manner
prohibited by this IHA, such as an
injury (Level A harassment), serious
injury, or mortality, Navy shall
immediately cease the specified
activities and report the incident to the
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
and the West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator, NMFS. The report must
include the following information:
A. Time and date of the incident;
B. Description of the incident;
C. Environmental conditions (e.g.,
wind speed and direction, Beaufort sea
state, cloud cover, and visibility);
D. Description of all marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
E. Species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
F. Fate of the animal(s); and
G. Photographs or video footage of the
animal(s).
Activities shall not resume until
NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take.
NMFS will work with Navy to
determine what measures are necessary
to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. Navy may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS.
ii. In the event that Navy discovers an
injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead observer determines that the
cause of the injury or death is unknown
and the death is relatively recent (e.g.,
in less than a moderate state of
decomposition), Navy shall immediately
report the incident to the Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, and the
West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator, NMFS.
The report must include the same
information identified in 6(b)(i) of this
IHA. Activities may continue while
NMFS reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with Navy to
determine whether additional
mitigation measures or modifications to
the activities are appropriate.
iii. In the event that Navy discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead observer determines that the
injury or death is not associated with or
related to the activities authorized in the
IHA (e.g., previously wounded animal,
carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, scavenger damage),
Navy shall report the incident to the
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
and the West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator, NMFS, within 24 hours of
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44057
the discovery. Navy shall provide
photographs or video footage or other
documentation of the stranded animal
sighting to NMFS.
7. This Authorization may be
modified, suspended or withdrawn if
the holder fails to abide by the
conditions prescribed herein, or if the
authorized taking is having more than a
negligible impact on the species or stock
of affected marine mammals.
Request for Public Comments
We request comment on our analyses,
the draft authorizations, and any other
aspect of this Notice of Proposed IHAs
for Navy’s pier maintenance activities.
Please include with your comments any
supporting data or literature citations to
help inform our final decision on Navy’s
request for an MMPA authorization.
Dated: July 20, 2015.
Perry F. Gayaldo,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–18145 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XZ28
Revision to Management Measures for
the Subsistence Taking of Northern
Fur Seals on St. Paul Island, Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS).
AGENCY:
NMFS announces its intent to
prepare an SEIS in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969. The SEIS will evaluate
alternatives which include petitioned
changes to the regulations governing
management of the northern fur seal
subsistence harvest on St. Paul Island,
Alaska. The SEIS will supplement the
2005 Final Environmental Impact
Statement for Setting the Annual
Subsistence Harvest of Northern Fur
Seals on the Pribilof Islands. NMFS
intends to prepare an SEIS because the
petitioned action would make
substantial changes to the action
analyzed in the 2005 EIS that are
relevant to environmental effects.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by 5 p.m. Alaska Standard
Time, August 24, 2015.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
44058
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
You may submit comments
on this document, identified by FDMS
Docket Number NOAA–NMFS–2015–
0073, by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150073, Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Jon
Kurland, Assistant Regional
Administrator for Protected Resources,
Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box
21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of the 2005 Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
Setting the Annual Subsistence Harvest
of Northern Fur Seals on the Pribilof
Islands, St. Paul Tribal Resolutions, and
other relevant documents are available
at: https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/
protectedresources/seals/fur.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Williams, Protected Resources
Division, NMFS Alaska Region, (907)
271–5117.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subsistence harvest of the eastern
Pacific stock of northern fur seals
(Callorhinus ursinus) on the Pribilof
Islands is governed by regulations at 50
CFR 216.71–.74 established under the
Fur Seal Act (FSA) (16 U.S.C. 1511 et
seq.) and Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA) (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.).
NMFS manages the harvest of northern
fur seals under regulations that impose
a variety of restrictions to meet the
subsistence needs of Pribilovians while
ensuring sustainable harvests. The
existing regulations (1) establish a 47day period between June 23 and August
8 of each year, during which fur seals
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
may be taken for subsistence purposes;
(2) limit the harvest of sub-adult male
fur seals to those 124.5 cm or less in
length; (3) identify specific hauling
grounds from which fur seals may be
taken, and provide that no hauling
ground on St. Paul may be harvested
more than once per week; (4) require
that NMFS receive adequate advance
notice of scheduled harvest activities to
enable NMFS to monitor the harvest;
and (5) require NMFS to publish
triennially a summary of the harvest
during the preceding three years and the
estimated subsistence needs for the next
three years (71 FR 8222, February 16,
2006; 73 FR 49616, August 22, 2008; 77
FR 6682, February 9, 2012).
The harvest regulations at 50 CFR
216.72(c)(2) additionally state ‘‘No fur
seal may be taken except by experienced
sealers using the traditional harvesting
methods, including stunning followed
immediately by exsanguination. The
harvesting method shall include
organized drives of sub-adult males to
killing fields unless it is determined by
the NMFS representatives, in
consultation with the Pribilovians
conducting the harvest that alternative
methods will not result in increased
disturbance to the rookery or the
increased accidental take of female
seals.’’
On February 16, 2007, the Aleut
Community of St. Paul Island, Tribal
Government (ACSPI) submitted a
petition for rulemaking requesting
NMFS revise regulations governing the
subsistence take of northern fur seals on
St. Paul. NMFS published the notice of
receipt of petition in the Federal
Register with a 60-day public comment
period (77 FR 41168, July 12, 2012).
NMFS received comment letters from
the Marine Mammal Commission
(MMC), Humane Society of the United
States, Center for Biological Diversity,
Alaskan Wildlife Federation, and two
individuals. On November 10, 2014 and
April 29, 2015, ACSPI submitted letters
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) to revise its
petition based on the public comments
and subsequent discussions during the
semi-annual St. Paul Island CoManagement Council meetings.
St. Paul Island
St. Paul Island is a remote island
located in the Bering Sea. St. Paul Island
residents have a need for long-term
sustainable use of northern fur seals for
subsistence purposes of cultural
continuity, food, clothing, arts, and
crafts. Alaska Natives from St. Paul
Island have a long history of harvesting
fur seals for subsistence purposes prior
to the United States’ purchase of Alaska
in 1867. Prior to the U.S. purchase of
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alaska, the Aleuts harvested northern
fur seal young of the year (pups); U.S.
records of these subsistence harvests of
pups indicate thousands were harvested
annually during the late 1800s and were
viewed by Aleuts as one of their most
valued food sources. In the late 1800s,
the fur seal population had declined
due to the international pelagic harvests
which killed mainly females on their
summer foraging trips; therefore, the
U.S. government asked the Aleuts of the
Pribilof Islands to stop harvesting young
of the year. The northern fur seal
population recovered by the mid-1960s,
but the pup harvest was never resumed.
The subsistence way of life has
remained an important, consistent, and
supporting factor in the personal,
economic, and traditional character of
ACSPI. A continued subsistence harvest
preserves traditional skills, provides a
culturally identifiable food source for
Alaska Native residents, and enables the
passing of cultural values to the next
generation. The ACSPI petitioned NMFS
on behalf of its tribal members to change
the current subsistence harvest
regulations to include the harvest of
pups, which were an important
traditional food source.
Proposed Action
Based on the petition and subsequent
revisions from the ACSPI, NMFS is
evaluating a proposed action to use both
harvester and scientific experience to
improve northern fur seal subsistence
harvest opportunities and refine existing
regulatory measures to conserve the
northern fur seal population on St. Paul
Island. The 2005 EIS analyzed setting
the annual fur seal subsistence harvest
take ranges for St. George Island and St.
Paul Island. NMFS intends to prepare
an SEIS because the proposed action
would make substantial changes to the
action analyzed in the 2005 EIS that are
relevant to environmental effects.
If NMFS determines that changes to
the existing regulations for subsistence
harvest on St. Paul Island are
appropriate, NMFS will issue a
proposed rule. Via the same rulemaking,
or possibly a separate rulemaking,
NMFS may propose certain changes to
the subsistence harvest regulations for
St. George Island (50 CFR 216.72) that
were analyzed in the August 2014 Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for the Management of the
Subsistence Harvest of Northern Fur
Seals on St. George Island, but not
implemented in the associated final rule
NMFS published in 2014 (79 FR 65327;
November 4, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed action is
to manage the subsistence harvest of fur
seals on St. Paul Island. NMFS action in
response to the petition from ACSPI is
needed to fulfill Federal trust
responsibilities under the MMPA and
FSA to conserve the northern fur seal
population and co-manage the
subsistence harvest with ACSPI. In
addition, NMFS trust responsibilities
include recognizing the subsistence
needs of Alaskan Natives on St. Paul
Island to the fullest extent possible
consistent with applicable law.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Alternatives
The proposed alternatives only apply
to northern fur seal subsistence harvests
on St. Paul Island, Alaska. NMFS is
currently considering three alternatives
for evaluation in the SEIS: Alternative 1
is the No Action Alternative; Alternative
2 (Petitioned Alternative) would modify
the management to allow for a regulated
harvest of northern fur seals to meet the
subsistence needs as described in the
petition from ACSPI; and Alternative 3
would incorporate aspects of
Alternative 2 as modified with measures
recommended from public comments
received in response to the notice of
receipt of the 2007 ACSPI petition (77
FR 41168; July 12, 2012).
Alternative 1, the no action
alternative, would maintain the current
subsistence harvest range on St. Paul
Island from 1,645 to 2,000 northern fur
seals. Federal regulations at 50 CFR
216.72 restrict subsistence harvests of
fur seals to a 47-day season between
June 23 and August 8 of each year. This
alternative continues the harvest under
the regulatory process used to establish
harvest take levels every three years,
and a set of restrictions that have been
in place since 1993. The restrictions
include prohibitions on any taking of
adult fur seals or pups, intentional
taking of sub-adult females, and taking
sub-adult males larger than 124.5 cm
long. The restrictions identify specific
harvest locations and harvest frequency
once per week per harvest site.
This alternative requires NMFS to
publish in the Federal Register a
summary of the number of seals taken
during the prior 3-year period and
expected to be taken annually over the
next 3-year period to meet local
subsistence needs. This information is
used to set lower and upper take ranges
for the number of seals that can be
harvested annually. Following a 30-day
public comment period, a final
notification of the take ranges for the
subsequent 3-year period is reported.
Under this alternative, NMFS would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
maintain the regulations suspending,
but not terminating, the harvest when
the lower end of the harvest range is
reached (1,645 fur seals). NMFS can lift
this suspension, if after a review of the
harvest data, it determines that the
community’s subsistence needs have
not been met. NMFS is then required to
publish a revised estimate of the
number of seals needed to meet the
community’s subsistence need up to the
upper end of the range (2,000 fur seals).
NMFS is also required to suspend the
harvest if it determines that the
subsistence needs of the community
have been satisfied, or if the harvest is
being conducted in a wasteful manner.
Alternative 2, the petitioned action,
would implement a regulated harvest of
northern fur seals to meet the
subsistence needs as described in the
November 10, 2014, revised petition and
subsequent clarifications from the
ACSPI. ACSPI proposed on April 29,
2015, that the St. Paul Island CoManagement Council set seasonal
limits, age class limits, or some
combination of season and age limits
not to exceed a total harvest of 2,000
male fur seals annually. The CoManagement Council is a body
established via an agreement between
NMFS and ACSPI under section 119 of
the MMPA to oversee subsistence
harvest of northern fur seals and Steller
sea lions on St. Paul Island, and
comprises NMFS and ACSPI
representatives.
Alternative 2 includes the following
provisions: (1) Lethally take up to 2,000
male fur seals annually; (2) if and when
20 female fur seals (1% of the harvest
quota) have been accidentally killed,
terminate all fur seal taking for the rest
of the year; (3) within the overall limit
of no more than 2,000 fur seals, take
juvenile male fur seals by hunting with
firearms from January 1 to May 31
annually and take by harvest (roundup,
stunning, and exsanguination) male
pups and juvenile male fur seals from
June 23 to December 31 annually; (4)
implement a subsistence harvest review
process to be overseen by the CoManagement Council to develop harvest
monitoring and allocation plans
intended to minimize sub-lethal effects
to seals not harvested, maximize
detection and avoidance of females,
prevent wasteful taking, and make inseason allocations among the age groups
and locations to be harvested. The total
harvest level under Alternative 2 would
be the same as the currently authorized
upper end of the harvest range for St.
Paul established for the 2014–2016
seasons (79 FR 45728; August 6, 2014).
In addition, the harvest would be
suspended for two days if and when 5
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44059
females have been accidentally killed,
which would allow time for ACSPI to
determine in consultation with NMFS
what measures can be taken to detect
and reduce additional mortality of
females.
Under Alternative 2, a pup would be
defined as a fur seal in the first year of
its life and a juvenile would be defined
as any animal that is older than a pup
but too young to reproduce (up to seven
years old). The current regulation uses
the term sub-adult which is in reference
to seals aged two to five years old or less
than 124.5 cm long. The prohibition on
taking animals greater than 124.5 cm in
length would be eliminated to allow
hunting larger fur seals from January 1
to May 31, most of which would be shot
in the water similar to the manner in
which Alaska Natives on St. Paul hunt
for Steller sea lions during this same
time period. The regulations suspending
the harvest when the lower end of the
harvest range is reached (1,645 fur seals)
would be eliminated. Additionally, all
fur seal pups to be harvested between
June 23 and December 31 would be
sexed before harvesting to ensure that
female pups are detected and not killed.
The location restrictions would be
changed to allow harvest round-ups to
originate in the rookeries and hauling
grounds.
Alternative 3 would incorporate
recommendations described in the
August 24, 2012 letter from the MMC
and other members of the public (see
ADDRESSES) into Alternative 2.
Specifically, Alternative 3 would
include the MMC’s recommendations
concerning monitoring of the harvest to
ensure no wasteful taking occurs,
disturbance at haulouts and taking of
females is minimized, and use of
firearms to harvest fur seals is
prohibited.
Thus Alternative 3 would: (1) Allow
342 days of harvest, split into two
seasons: January 1 to May 31, and June
23 to December 31; (2) from June 23 to
December 31 limit the harvest of up to
1,500 male pups; (3) allow up to 500
juvenile males to be harvested during
either season; and (4) include a new
prohibition to terminate the harvest for
the year if and when 20 female fur seals
have been killed. Unlike Alternative 2,
Alternative 3 would specifically
prohibit any use of firearms such that
juvenile and pup fur seals would be
harvested using the current method of
roundup, stunning, and exsanguination.
Alternative 3 would maintain the
current subsistence harvest range on St.
Paul Island from 1,645 to 2,000 northern
fur seals, and the existing suspension
provisions. Alternative 3 would define
fur seal life stages to be harvested in the
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
44060
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
same fashion as Alternative 2. Based on
public comments this alternative would
include criteria to determine if taking
during the subsistence harvest is
occurring in a wasteful manner.
Additionally, all fur seal pups to be
harvested from June 23 to December 31
would be sexed before harvesting to
ensure that female pups are detected
and not killed. This alternative would
include provisions for ACSPI and NMFS
to jointly develop harvest monitoring
plans within the co-management
structure intended to minimize sublethal effects to seals not harvested,
maximize detection and avoidance of
females, and prevent wasteful taking.
Public Involvement
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scoping is an early and open process
for determining the scope of issues,
alternatives, and impacts to be
addressed in an EIS, and for identifying
the significant issues related to the
proposed action. A principal objective
of the scoping and public involvement
process is to identify a range of
reasonable management alternatives
that, with adequate analysis, will
delineate critical issues and provide a
clear basis for distinguishing among
those alternatives and selecting a
preferred alternative. NMFS began
informal scoping for this issue in 2007
when it received the petition from the
ACSPI proposing changes in harvest
regulations to better meet the
community’s subsistence need.
NMFS is seeking written public
comments on the scope of issues,
potential impacts, and alternatives that
should be considered for the fur seal
harvest regulations. NMFS is also
seeking public comments regarding
whether the SEIS should evaluate
additional alternatives, such as different
levels of age-specific harvests and
harvest termination thresholds to
manage the subsistence removals of fur
seals on St. Paul Island. Written
comments will be accepted at the
address above (see ADDRESSES). Written
comments should be as specific as
possible to be the most helpful. NMFS
will incorporate scoping comments
received into the Draft SEIS.
Dated: July 21, 2015.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–18176 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
RIN 0648–XE030
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Pacific Islands Pelagic Squid Jig
Fishing Permit.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0589.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (revision
and extension of a currently approved
information collection).
Number of Respondents: 5.
Average Hours Per Response: Permit
applications and renewals, 15 minutes;
appeals, 2 hours.
Burden Hours: 3.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
revision and extension of a currently
approved information collection.
Federal regulations at Title 50, part
665, of the Code of Federal Regulations
require that owners of vessels fishing
for, or landing, pelagic squid in the
western Pacific region obtain a permit
from NOAA Fisheries Service (NMFS).
In this revision/extension, the vessel ID
requirements have been incorporated
into Pacific Islands Region Vessel and
Gear Identification Requirements (OMB
Control No. 0648–0360) and the
reporting requirement is being moved to
Pacific Islands Logbook Family of Forms
(OMB Control No. 0648–0214). There
have also been minor changes to the
permit application form, and
instructions added.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Frequency: Annually and on occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–18158 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; San FranciscoOakland Bay Bridge Pier E3 Demolition
via Controlled Implosion
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments and information.
AGENCY:
NMFS has received a request
from the California Department of
Transportation (CALTRANS) for an
authorization to take small numbers of
four species of marine mammals, by
Level B harassment, incidental to
proposed San Francisco-Oakland Bay
Bridge (SFOBB) Pier E3 demolition via
controlled implosion in San Francisco
Bay (SFB or Bay). Pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments
on its proposal to issue an authorization
to CALTRANS to incidentally take, by
harassment, small numbers of marine
mammals for its proposed controlled
implosion.
SUMMARY:
Comments and information must
be received no later than August 24,
2015.
DATES:
Comments on the
application should be addressed to Jolie
Harrison, Chief, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. The
mailbox address for providing email
comments is itp.guan@noaa.gov. NMFS
is not responsible for email comments
sent to addresses other than the one
provided here. Comments sent via
email, including all attachments, must
not exceed a 25-megabyte file size.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm without change. All
Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
A copy of the application may be
obtained by writing to the address
specified above or visiting the internet
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44057-44060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18176]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XZ28
Revision to Management Measures for the Subsistence Taking of
Northern Fur Seals on St. Paul Island, Alaska
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces its intent to prepare an SEIS in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The SEIS will
evaluate alternatives which include petitioned changes to the
regulations governing management of the northern fur seal subsistence
harvest on St. Paul Island, Alaska. The SEIS will supplement the 2005
Final Environmental Impact Statement for Setting the Annual Subsistence
Harvest of Northern Fur Seals on the Pribilof Islands. NMFS intends to
prepare an SEIS because the petitioned action would make substantial
changes to the action analyzed in the 2005 EIS that are relevant to
environmental effects.
DATES: Written comments must be received by 5 p.m. Alaska Standard
Time, August 24, 2015.
[[Page 44058]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by FDMS
Docket Number NOAA-NMFS-2015-0073, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via
the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0073, Click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Jon Kurland, Assistant Regional
Administrator for Protected Resources, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the 2005 Final Environmental Impact Statement
for Setting the Annual Subsistence Harvest of Northern Fur Seals on the
Pribilof Islands, St. Paul Tribal Resolutions, and other relevant
documents are available at: https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/protectedresources/seals/fur.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Williams, Protected Resources
Division, NMFS Alaska Region, (907) 271-5117.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subsistence harvest of the eastern
Pacific stock of northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) on the
Pribilof Islands is governed by regulations at 50 CFR 216.71-.74
established under the Fur Seal Act (FSA) (16 U.S.C. 1511 et seq.) and
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.). NMFS
manages the harvest of northern fur seals under regulations that impose
a variety of restrictions to meet the subsistence needs of Pribilovians
while ensuring sustainable harvests. The existing regulations (1)
establish a 47-day period between June 23 and August 8 of each year,
during which fur seals may be taken for subsistence purposes; (2) limit
the harvest of sub-adult male fur seals to those 124.5 cm or less in
length; (3) identify specific hauling grounds from which fur seals may
be taken, and provide that no hauling ground on St. Paul may be
harvested more than once per week; (4) require that NMFS receive
adequate advance notice of scheduled harvest activities to enable NMFS
to monitor the harvest; and (5) require NMFS to publish triennially a
summary of the harvest during the preceding three years and the
estimated subsistence needs for the next three years (71 FR 8222,
February 16, 2006; 73 FR 49616, August 22, 2008; 77 FR 6682, February
9, 2012).
The harvest regulations at 50 CFR 216.72(c)(2) additionally state
``No fur seal may be taken except by experienced sealers using the
traditional harvesting methods, including stunning followed immediately
by exsanguination. The harvesting method shall include organized drives
of sub-adult males to killing fields unless it is determined by the
NMFS representatives, in consultation with the Pribilovians conducting
the harvest that alternative methods will not result in increased
disturbance to the rookery or the increased accidental take of female
seals.''
On February 16, 2007, the Aleut Community of St. Paul Island,
Tribal Government (ACSPI) submitted a petition for rulemaking
requesting NMFS revise regulations governing the subsistence take of
northern fur seals on St. Paul. NMFS published the notice of receipt of
petition in the Federal Register with a 60-day public comment period
(77 FR 41168, July 12, 2012). NMFS received comment letters from the
Marine Mammal Commission (MMC), Humane Society of the United States,
Center for Biological Diversity, Alaskan Wildlife Federation, and two
individuals. On November 10, 2014 and April 29, 2015, ACSPI submitted
letters to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) to revise its petition based on the
public comments and subsequent discussions during the semi-annual St.
Paul Island Co-Management Council meetings.
St. Paul Island
St. Paul Island is a remote island located in the Bering Sea. St.
Paul Island residents have a need for long-term sustainable use of
northern fur seals for subsistence purposes of cultural continuity,
food, clothing, arts, and crafts. Alaska Natives from St. Paul Island
have a long history of harvesting fur seals for subsistence purposes
prior to the United States' purchase of Alaska in 1867. Prior to the
U.S. purchase of Alaska, the Aleuts harvested northern fur seal young
of the year (pups); U.S. records of these subsistence harvests of pups
indicate thousands were harvested annually during the late 1800s and
were viewed by Aleuts as one of their most valued food sources. In the
late 1800s, the fur seal population had declined due to the
international pelagic harvests which killed mainly females on their
summer foraging trips; therefore, the U.S. government asked the Aleuts
of the Pribilof Islands to stop harvesting young of the year. The
northern fur seal population recovered by the mid-1960s, but the pup
harvest was never resumed.
The subsistence way of life has remained an important, consistent,
and supporting factor in the personal, economic, and traditional
character of ACSPI. A continued subsistence harvest preserves
traditional skills, provides a culturally identifiable food source for
Alaska Native residents, and enables the passing of cultural values to
the next generation. The ACSPI petitioned NMFS on behalf of its tribal
members to change the current subsistence harvest regulations to
include the harvest of pups, which were an important traditional food
source.
Proposed Action
Based on the petition and subsequent revisions from the ACSPI, NMFS
is evaluating a proposed action to use both harvester and scientific
experience to improve northern fur seal subsistence harvest
opportunities and refine existing regulatory measures to conserve the
northern fur seal population on St. Paul Island. The 2005 EIS analyzed
setting the annual fur seal subsistence harvest take ranges for St.
George Island and St. Paul Island. NMFS intends to prepare an SEIS
because the proposed action would make substantial changes to the
action analyzed in the 2005 EIS that are relevant to environmental
effects.
If NMFS determines that changes to the existing regulations for
subsistence harvest on St. Paul Island are appropriate, NMFS will issue
a proposed rule. Via the same rulemaking, or possibly a separate
rulemaking, NMFS may propose certain changes to the subsistence harvest
regulations for St. George Island (50 CFR 216.72) that were analyzed in
the August 2014 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for
the Management of the Subsistence Harvest of Northern Fur Seals on St.
George Island, but not implemented in the associated final rule NMFS
published in 2014 (79 FR 65327; November 4, 2014).
[[Page 44059]]
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed action is to manage the subsistence
harvest of fur seals on St. Paul Island. NMFS action in response to the
petition from ACSPI is needed to fulfill Federal trust responsibilities
under the MMPA and FSA to conserve the northern fur seal population and
co-manage the subsistence harvest with ACSPI. In addition, NMFS trust
responsibilities include recognizing the subsistence needs of Alaskan
Natives on St. Paul Island to the fullest extent possible consistent
with applicable law.
Proposed Alternatives
The proposed alternatives only apply to northern fur seal
subsistence harvests on St. Paul Island, Alaska. NMFS is currently
considering three alternatives for evaluation in the SEIS: Alternative
1 is the No Action Alternative; Alternative 2 (Petitioned Alternative)
would modify the management to allow for a regulated harvest of
northern fur seals to meet the subsistence needs as described in the
petition from ACSPI; and Alternative 3 would incorporate aspects of
Alternative 2 as modified with measures recommended from public
comments received in response to the notice of receipt of the 2007
ACSPI petition (77 FR 41168; July 12, 2012).
Alternative 1, the no action alternative, would maintain the
current subsistence harvest range on St. Paul Island from 1,645 to
2,000 northern fur seals. Federal regulations at 50 CFR 216.72 restrict
subsistence harvests of fur seals to a 47-day season between June 23
and August 8 of each year. This alternative continues the harvest under
the regulatory process used to establish harvest take levels every
three years, and a set of restrictions that have been in place since
1993. The restrictions include prohibitions on any taking of adult fur
seals or pups, intentional taking of sub-adult females, and taking sub-
adult males larger than 124.5 cm long. The restrictions identify
specific harvest locations and harvest frequency once per week per
harvest site.
This alternative requires NMFS to publish in the Federal Register a
summary of the number of seals taken during the prior 3-year period and
expected to be taken annually over the next 3-year period to meet local
subsistence needs. This information is used to set lower and upper take
ranges for the number of seals that can be harvested annually.
Following a 30-day public comment period, a final notification of the
take ranges for the subsequent 3-year period is reported. Under this
alternative, NMFS would maintain the regulations suspending, but not
terminating, the harvest when the lower end of the harvest range is
reached (1,645 fur seals). NMFS can lift this suspension, if after a
review of the harvest data, it determines that the community's
subsistence needs have not been met. NMFS is then required to publish a
revised estimate of the number of seals needed to meet the community's
subsistence need up to the upper end of the range (2,000 fur seals).
NMFS is also required to suspend the harvest if it determines that the
subsistence needs of the community have been satisfied, or if the
harvest is being conducted in a wasteful manner.
Alternative 2, the petitioned action, would implement a regulated
harvest of northern fur seals to meet the subsistence needs as
described in the November 10, 2014, revised petition and subsequent
clarifications from the ACSPI. ACSPI proposed on April 29, 2015, that
the St. Paul Island Co-Management Council set seasonal limits, age
class limits, or some combination of season and age limits not to
exceed a total harvest of 2,000 male fur seals annually. The Co-
Management Council is a body established via an agreement between NMFS
and ACSPI under section 119 of the MMPA to oversee subsistence harvest
of northern fur seals and Steller sea lions on St. Paul Island, and
comprises NMFS and ACSPI representatives.
Alternative 2 includes the following provisions: (1) Lethally take
up to 2,000 male fur seals annually; (2) if and when 20 female fur
seals (1% of the harvest quota) have been accidentally killed,
terminate all fur seal taking for the rest of the year; (3) within the
overall limit of no more than 2,000 fur seals, take juvenile male fur
seals by hunting with firearms from January 1 to May 31 annually and
take by harvest (roundup, stunning, and exsanguination) male pups and
juvenile male fur seals from June 23 to December 31 annually; (4)
implement a subsistence harvest review process to be overseen by the
Co-Management Council to develop harvest monitoring and allocation
plans intended to minimize sub-lethal effects to seals not harvested,
maximize detection and avoidance of females, prevent wasteful taking,
and make in-season allocations among the age groups and locations to be
harvested. The total harvest level under Alternative 2 would be the
same as the currently authorized upper end of the harvest range for St.
Paul established for the 2014-2016 seasons (79 FR 45728; August 6,
2014). In addition, the harvest would be suspended for two days if and
when 5 females have been accidentally killed, which would allow time
for ACSPI to determine in consultation with NMFS what measures can be
taken to detect and reduce additional mortality of females.
Under Alternative 2, a pup would be defined as a fur seal in the
first year of its life and a juvenile would be defined as any animal
that is older than a pup but too young to reproduce (up to seven years
old). The current regulation uses the term sub-adult which is in
reference to seals aged two to five years old or less than 124.5 cm
long. The prohibition on taking animals greater than 124.5 cm in length
would be eliminated to allow hunting larger fur seals from January 1 to
May 31, most of which would be shot in the water similar to the manner
in which Alaska Natives on St. Paul hunt for Steller sea lions during
this same time period. The regulations suspending the harvest when the
lower end of the harvest range is reached (1,645 fur seals) would be
eliminated. Additionally, all fur seal pups to be harvested between
June 23 and December 31 would be sexed before harvesting to ensure that
female pups are detected and not killed. The location restrictions
would be changed to allow harvest round-ups to originate in the
rookeries and hauling grounds.
Alternative 3 would incorporate recommendations described in the
August 24, 2012 letter from the MMC and other members of the public
(see ADDRESSES) into Alternative 2. Specifically, Alternative 3 would
include the MMC's recommendations concerning monitoring of the harvest
to ensure no wasteful taking occurs, disturbance at haulouts and taking
of females is minimized, and use of firearms to harvest fur seals is
prohibited.
Thus Alternative 3 would: (1) Allow 342 days of harvest, split into
two seasons: January 1 to May 31, and June 23 to December 31; (2) from
June 23 to December 31 limit the harvest of up to 1,500 male pups; (3)
allow up to 500 juvenile males to be harvested during either season;
and (4) include a new prohibition to terminate the harvest for the year
if and when 20 female fur seals have been killed. Unlike Alternative 2,
Alternative 3 would specifically prohibit any use of firearms such that
juvenile and pup fur seals would be harvested using the current method
of roundup, stunning, and exsanguination.
Alternative 3 would maintain the current subsistence harvest range
on St. Paul Island from 1,645 to 2,000 northern fur seals, and the
existing suspension provisions. Alternative 3 would define fur seal
life stages to be harvested in the
[[Page 44060]]
same fashion as Alternative 2. Based on public comments this
alternative would include criteria to determine if taking during the
subsistence harvest is occurring in a wasteful manner. Additionally,
all fur seal pups to be harvested from June 23 to December 31 would be
sexed before harvesting to ensure that female pups are detected and not
killed. This alternative would include provisions for ACSPI and NMFS to
jointly develop harvest monitoring plans within the co-management
structure intended to minimize sub-lethal effects to seals not
harvested, maximize detection and avoidance of females, and prevent
wasteful taking.
Public Involvement
Scoping is an early and open process for determining the scope of
issues, alternatives, and impacts to be addressed in an EIS, and for
identifying the significant issues related to the proposed action. A
principal objective of the scoping and public involvement process is to
identify a range of reasonable management alternatives that, with
adequate analysis, will delineate critical issues and provide a clear
basis for distinguishing among those alternatives and selecting a
preferred alternative. NMFS began informal scoping for this issue in
2007 when it received the petition from the ACSPI proposing changes in
harvest regulations to better meet the community's subsistence need.
NMFS is seeking written public comments on the scope of issues,
potential impacts, and alternatives that should be considered for the
fur seal harvest regulations. NMFS is also seeking public comments
regarding whether the SEIS should evaluate additional alternatives,
such as different levels of age-specific harvests and harvest
termination thresholds to manage the subsistence removals of fur seals
on St. Paul Island. Written comments will be accepted at the address
above (see ADDRESSES). Written comments should be as specific as
possible to be the most helpful. NMFS will incorporate scoping comments
received into the Draft SEIS.
Dated: July 21, 2015.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-18176 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P