South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge; Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, 43456-43459 [2015-17991]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43456
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Notices
components and one foreign-origin
software component, occurs entirely in
Virginia, United States in a period of up
to 16 days. As a result of the processing
in the United States, based on the
totality of the circumstances and
assuming that four of the components
actually originate in the United States as
claimed, we find that the imported
hardware and software components will
be substantially transformed. Therefore,
the country of origin of the VistA
Storage Solution will be the United
States for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the
hardware and software components will
be substantially transformed through an
assembly process that occurs entirely in
the United States. As such, the VistA
Storage Solution will be considered a
product of the United States for
purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days of
publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial
review of this final determination before
the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Harold Singer, Acting Executive
Director
Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade
[FR Doc. 2015–17963 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
[Docket No. TSA–2002–11602]
Extension of Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review:
Security Programs for Foreign Air
Carriers
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
(OMB) control number 1652–0005,
abstracted below to OMB for review and
approval of an extension of the
currently approved collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. TSA published a Federal
Register notice, with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments, of the
following collection of information on
April 14, 2015, (80 FR 20003). This
information collection is mandatory for
foreign air carriers and must be
submitted prior to entry into the United
States.
DATES: Send your comments by August
21, 2015. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB. Comments should be
addressed to Desk Officer, Department
of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina A. Walsh, TSA PRA Officer,
Office of Information Technology (OIT),
TSA–11, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 20598–6011; telephone
(571) 227–2062; email TSAPRA@
dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at https://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
Title: Security Programs for Foreign
Air Carriers.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0005.
Forms(s): N/A.
Affected Public: Foreign air carriers.
Abstract: TSA uses the information
collected to determine compliance with
49 CFR part 1546 and to ensure
passenger safety by monitoring foreign
air carrier security procedures. Foreign
air carriers must carry out security
measures to provide for the safety of
persons and property traveling on
flights provided by the foreign air
carrier against acts of criminal violence
and air piracy, and the introduction of
explosives, incendiaries, or weapons
aboard an aircraft. This information
collection is mandatory for foreign air
carriers and must be submitted prior to
entry into the United States. The TSA
information collection includes
providing information to TSA as
outlined in the carrier’s security
program, maintaining records of
compliance with 49 CFR part 1546 and
the foreign air carrier’s security
program, and security training;
suspicious incident reporting, and
submitting identifying information on
foreign air carriers’ flight crews and
passengers.
Number of Respondents: 170.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 1,029,010 hours annually.
Dated: July 16, 2015.
Joanna Johnson,
Acting TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer,
Office of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2015–17986 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2015–N087;
FXRS282108E8PD0–156–F2013227943]
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration
Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards San
Francisco Bay National Wildlife
Refuge; Draft Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact
Report
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for public comments; announcement of
meeting.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Notices
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), in
coordination with the California State
Coastal Conservancy, announce the
availability of a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (DEIS/EIR) for Phase 2 of
the South Bay Salt Pond (SBSP)
Restoration Project at the Don Edwards
San Francisco Bay National Wildlife
Refuge (Refuge) in Alameda, Santa
Clara, and San Mateo Counties,
California. The DEIS/EIR, which we
prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), describes and analyzes
the alternatives identified for Phase 2 of
the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration
Project.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
September 22, 2015. A public meeting
will be held on August 4, 2015 between
6 p.m. and 8 p.m. (see ADDRESSES).
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meeting should
contact Ariel Ambruster, by email at
aambrust@ccp.csus.edu or by phone at
510–528–5006, at least 1 week in
advance of the meeting to allow time to
process the request.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You
may obtain copies of the document in
the following places:
• Internet: https://
www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/
phase2/.
• In-Person:
Æ San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge Complex Headquarters,
1 Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94555.
Æ The following libraries:
D Alviso Branch Library, 5050 N. First
St., San Jose, CA 95002.
D Biblioteca Latino America, 921
South First St., San Jose, CA 95110.
D California State University Library,
25800 Carlos Bee Blvd., Hayward, CA
94542.
D Fremont Main Library, 2400
Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538.
D Menlo Park Library, 800 Alma St.,
Menlo Park, CA 94025.
D Mountain View Library, 585
Franklin St., Mountain View, CA 94041.
D Rinconada Library, 1213 Newell
Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303.
D King Library, 150 E San Fernando
St., San Jose, CA 95112.
D Redwood City Main Library, 1044
Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA
94063.
D San Mateo County East Palo Alto
Library, 2415 University Ave., East Palo
Alto, CA 94303.
D Santa Clara County Milpitas
Library, 160 N Main St., Milpitas, CA
95035.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
D Santa Clara Public Library, 2635
Homestead Rd., Santa Clara, CA 95051.
D Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W
Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086.
D Natural Resources Library, U.S.
Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street
NW., Washington, DC 20240–0001.
For how to view comments on the
draft EIS from the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), or for
information on EPA’s role in the EIS
process, see EPA’s Role in the EIS
Process under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit written comments by one of the
following methods:
• Electronically: Send comments via
email to phase2comments@
southbayrestoration.org. Your
correspondence should indicate which
pond complex, alternative, or issue your
comments pertain to.
• By Hard Copy: Send written
comments to Anne Morkill, Project
Leader, Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge, 1 Marshlands
Road, Fremont, CA 94555, or to Brenda
Buxton, Project Manager, State Coastal
Conservancy, 1330 Broadway, 13th
Floor, Oakland, CA 94612.
• By Fax: You may also send
comments by facsimile to 510–792–
5828.
To have your name added to our
mailing list, contact Ariel Ambruster
(see DATES).
Public Meeting: A public meeting will
be held on August 4, 2015, from 6 p.m.
to 8 p.m., at the Mountain View
Community Center, located at 201 S.
Rengstorff Avenue, Mountain View,
California 94040–1706. Staff will be
available to take comments and answer
questions during this time. The details
of the public meeting will be posted on
the SBSP Restoration Project’s Web site
at https://www.southbayrestoration.org/
events/. Meeting details will also be
emailed to the Project’s Stakeholder
Forum and to those interested parties
who request to be notified. Notification
requests can be made by contacting the
SBSP Restoration Project’s public
outreach coordinator Ariel Ambruster
(see DATES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Morkill, Project Leader, USFWS,
510–792–0222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
coordination with the California State
Coastal Conservancy, we publish this
notice to announce the availability of a
DEIS/EIR for Phase 2 of the SBSP
Restoration Project at the Don Edwards
San Francisco Bay Refuge in Alameda,
Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties,
California. Phase 2 involves Ponds R3,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43457
R4, R5, S5, A1, A2W, A8, A8S, A19,
A20, and A21. The DEIS/EIR, which we
prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), describes and analyzes
the alternatives identified for Phase 2 of
the SBSP Restoration Project. In
addition to our publication of this
notice, EPA is publishing a notice
announcing the draft CCP and EIS, as
required under section 309 of the Clean
Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) The
publication date of EPA’s notice of
availability is the start of the public
comment period for the draft EIS. Under
the CAA, EPA also must subsequently
announce the final EIS via the Federal
Register.
EPA’s Role in the EIS Process
The EPA is charged under section 309
of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) to
review all Federal agencies’
environmental impact statements (EISs)
and to comment on the adequacy and
the acceptability of the environmental
impacts of proposed actions in the EISs.
EPA also serves as the repository (EIS
database) for EISs prepared by Federal
agencies and provides notice of their
availability in the Federal Register. The
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Database provides information about
EISs prepared by Federal agencies, as
well as EPA’s comments concerning the
EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA, which
publishes a notice of availability on
Fridays in the Federal Register.
The notice of availability is the start
of the public comment period for draft
EISs, and the start of the 30-day ‘‘wait
period’’ for final EISs, during which
agencies are generally required to wait
30 days before making a decision on a
proposed action. For more information,
see https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
nepa/eisdata.html. You may search for
EPA comments on EISs, along with EISs
themselves, at https://
cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/
action/eis/search.
Background
In December 2007, the USFWS and
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife (CDFW) published a Final EIS/
EIR for the SBSP Restoration Project at
the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
Refuge and the CDFW Eden Landing
Ecological Reserve (December 28, 2007;
72 FR 73799). The overall south bay salt
pond restoration area includes 15,100
acres that the USFWS and the CDFW
acquired from Cargill, Inc. in 2003. The
lands acquired from Cargill are divided
into three pond complexes: The
Ravenswood Pond Complex, in San
Mateo County, managed by the USFWS;
the Alviso Pond complex, also managed
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
43458
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Notices
by the USFWS, which is mostly in Santa
Clara County, with five ponds in
Alameda County; and the Eden Landing
Pond Complex, in Alameda County,
which is owned and managed by the
CDFW. The SBSP Restoration Project
presented in the Final EIS/EIR was both
programmatic, covering a 50-year
period, and project-level, addressing the
specific components and
implementation of Phase 1.
In January 2008, we signed a Record
of Decision selecting the Tidal Emphasis
Alternative (Alternative C) for
implementation. This alternative will
result in 90 percent of the USFWS’s
ponds on the Refuge being restored to
tidal wetlands and 10 percent converted
to managed ponds. Under Phase 1 of
Alternative C, we restored ponds E8A,
E8X, E9, E12, and E13 at the Eden
Landing complex; A6, A8, A16, and A17
at the Alviso complex; and SF2 at the
Ravenswood complex. We also added
several trails, interpretive features, and
other recreational access points.
Construction was completed on the
USFWS ponds in 2013.
We now propose restoration or
enhancement of over 2,000 acres of
former salt ponds in the second phase
of the SBSP Restoration Project. In
Phase 2 DEIS/EIR, we provide projectlevel analysis of proposed restoration or
enhancement of portions of the
following three geographically separate
pond clusters: The Ravenswood Pond
Complex (R3, R4, R5, and S5), the
Alviso Pond Complex–Mountain View
Ponds (A1 and A2W), the Alviso Pond
Complex–A8 Ponds (A8 and A8S), and
the Alviso Pond Complex–Island Ponds
(A19, A20, and A21). Some Phase 2
alternatives also include collaborative
restoration and flood management
activities with non-USFWS landowners
of adjacent lands and managers of
public infrastructures. Other Phase 2
alternatives do not include these
components. These pond clusters are
illustrated in Figures 1–5 on the SBSP
Restoration Project Web site at https://
www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/
phase2/.
Phase 2 of the SBSP Restoration
Project is intended to restore and
enhance tidal wetlands and managed
pond habitats in South San Francisco
Bay while providing for flood
management and wildlife-oriented
public access and recreation. In this
Phase 2 document, we would continue
habitat restoration activities in both
USFWS pond complexes, while also
providing recreation and public access
opportunities and maintaining or
improving current levels of flood
protection in the surrounding
communities. Phase 2 actions are also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
being planned for implementation at the
Eden Landing Pond Complex, which is
owned and managed by the CDFW as
part of the Eden Landing Wildlife
Sanctuary, but these actions will be
addressed under a separate process
under the NEPA and California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). We
will address activities at other ponds in
subsequent phases.
Alternatives
We consider a range of alternatives
and their impacts in the DEIS/EIR,
including No Action Alternatives for
each group of ponds. The range of
alternatives includes varying
approaches to restoring tidal marshes
(including number and location of
breaches and other levee modifications),
habitat enhancements (islands,
transition zones, and channels),
modifications to existing levees and
berms to maintain or improve flood
protection, and recreation and public
access components (including trails,
boardwalks, and viewing platforms)
which correspond to the project
objectives.
The alternatives for each group of
ponds (‘‘pond cluster’’) are described
below. The No Action Alternatives are
described together, followed by the
Action Alternatives that are under
consideration for each pond cluster. In
each group of ponds, each subsequently
lettered alternative usually has
successively more components and
greater amounts of construction. Thus,
at a given pond cluster, Alternative C
would involve more components that
Alternative B, which has more than
Alternative A (No Action). One
exception to this arrangement is at
Ravenswood, where there are three
Action Alternatives and where the
defining feature of each alternative is
not ‘‘more components versus fewer
components’’ but rather a different
restoration goal for some of the small
ponds there.
Alviso–Island Ponds, Alviso–Mountain
View Ponds, Alviso–A8 Ponds, and
Ravenswood Ponds—Alternatives A (No
Action)
Under Alternatives Island A,
Mountain View A, A8 A, and
Ravenswood A (the No Action
Alternative at each of these pond
clusters), no new activities would be
implemented as part of Phase 2. The
pond clusters would continue to be
monitored and managed through the
activities described in the Adaptive
Management Plan (AMP) and in
accordance with current USFWS
practices.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alviso Island Ponds
Alternative Island B
Alternative Island B would breach
Pond A19’s northern levee and remove
or lower levees between Ponds A19 and
A20 to increase connectivity and
improve the ecological function of both
ponds.
Alternative Island C
Alternative Island C would include
the components of Alternative Island B
with the addition of levee breaches on
the north sides of Ponds A20 and A21,
lowering of portions of levees around
Pond A20, pilot channels in Pond A19,
and widening the existing breaches on
the southern levee of Pond A19.
Alviso-Mountain View Ponds
Alternative Mountain View B
Under Alternative Mountain View B,
Ponds A1 and A2W levees would be
breached at several points to introduce
tidal flow in the ponds. Portions of
Pond A1’s western levee would be built
up to maintain current levels of flood
protection provided by the pond itself.
Habitat transition zones and habitat
islands would be constructed in the
ponds to increase habitat complexity
and quality for special-status species. A
new trail and viewing platform would
be installed to improve recreation and
public access at these ponds.
Alternative Mountain View C
Under Alternative Mountain View C,
levees would be breached and lowered
to increase tidal flows in Pond A1, Pond
A2W, and Charleston Slough. The
inclusion of Charleston Slough (by
breaching and lowering much of Pond
A1’s western levee) is the primary
distinguishing feature between
Alternative Mountain View B and
Alternative Mountain View C. Several
additional new trails and viewing
platforms would be installed or replaced
to improve recreation and public access
at the pond cluster. To continue
providing water to the City of Mountain
View’s Shoreline Park sailing lake, a
new water intake would be constructed
at the proposed breach between Pond
A1 and Charleston Slough.
Alviso—A8 Ponds
Alternative A8 B
Alternative A8 B proposes the
construction of habitat transition zones
in Pond A8S’s southwest corner,
southeast corner, or both, depending on
the amount of material available.
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Notices
43459
Ravenswood Ponds
Public Comments
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Alternative Ravenswood B
We request that you send comments
only by one of the methods described in
ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment
that includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top
of your document that we withhold this
information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
In addition to providing written
comments, the public is encouraged to
attend a public meeting on August 4,
2015, to solicit comments on the DEIS/
EIR. The location of the public meeting
is provided in the ADDRESSES section.
We will accept both oral and written
comments at the public meeting.
National Park Service
Alternative Ravenswood B would
open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood
protection, create habitat transition zone
along the western edge of Pond R4,
establish managed ponds to improve
habitat for diving and dabbling birds,
increase pond connectivity, and add a
viewing platform to improve recreation
and public access.
Alternative Ravenswood C
Alternative Ravenswood C would be
similar to Alternative Ravenswood B,
with the following exceptions: Ponds R5
and S5 would be converted to a
particular type of managed pond that is
operated to maintain intertidal mudflat
elevation; water control structures
would be installed on Pond R3 to allow
for improvement to the habitat for
western snowy plover; an additional
habitat transition zone would be
constructed; and two public access and
recreational trails and additional
viewing platforms would be
constructed.
Alternative Ravenswood D
Alternative Ravenswood D would
open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood
protection, create two habitat transition
zones in Pond R4, establish enhanced
managed ponds in Ponds R5 and S5,
increase pond connectivity, enhance
Pond R3 for western snowy plover
habitat, remove the levees within and
between Ponds R5 and S5, and improve
recreation and public access.
Alternative Ravenswood D would also
allow temporary stormwater detention
into Ponds R5 and S5 via connections
with the City of Redwood City’s
Bayfront Canal and Atherton Channel
Project. This would treat a residual
salinity problem in Ponds R5 and S5.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NEPA Compliance
We are conducting environmental
review in accordance with the
requirements of NEPA, as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its implementing
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
other applicable regulations, and our
procedures for compliance with those
regulations. The DEIS/EIR discusses the
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
of the alternatives on biological
resources, cultural resources, water
quality, and other environmental
resources. Measures to minimize
adverse environmental effects are
identified and discussed in the DEIS/
EIR.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Ren Lohoefener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2015–17991 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAZP02000.L54100000.FR0000.LVCLA1
2A5210.241A; AZA–35780]
Notice of Realty Action: Application for
Conveyance of Federally Owned
Mineral Interests in Pima County,
Arizona; Correction
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION:
Correction.
This action corrects the land
description referenced in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of a
notice published in the Federal Register
on Thursday, February 12, 2015 (80 FR
7877).
On page 7877, column 3, line 67 of
the notice, which reads, ‘‘THENCE,
North 89 degrees 25 minutes 53 seconds
West, 3297.38 feet to a point on the
North line of Section 21,’’ is hereby
corrected to read, ‘‘THENCE, North 1
degree 20 minutes 28 seconds West,
3297.38 feet to a point on the North line
of Section 21.’’
SUMMARY:
Rem Hawes,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2015–17961 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–32–P
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[NPS–NERO–STSP–18379; PPNESTSP00
PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
Request for Nominations for the StarSpangled Banner National Historic
Trail Advisory Council
National Park Service, Interior.
Request for nominations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, is
seeking nominations for individuals to
be considered for appointment to the
Star-Spangled Banner National Historic
Trail Advisory Council.
DATES: Written nominations must be
received by August 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send nominations to: Chuck
Grady, Chief of Administration, Fort
McHenry National Monument &
Historic Shrine, Hampton National
Historic Site, Star-Spangled Banner
National Historic Trail, 2400 East Fort
Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21230,
telephone (410) 962–4290, ext. 110, or
via email at charles_grady@nps.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chuck Grady, Chief of Administration,
Fort McHenry National Monument &
Historic Shrine, Hampton National
Historic Site, Star-Spangled Banner
National Historic Trail, 2400 East Fort
Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21230,
telephone (410) 962–4290, ext. 110 or
via email at charles_grady@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Council was established under the
National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C.
1241 to 1251, as amended). The purpose
of the Council is to consult with the
Secretary of the Interior on matters
relating to the Star-Spangled Banner
NHT, including but not limited to, the
selection of rights-of-way, standards for
the erection and maintenance of
markers along the Trail, and
interpretation and administration of the
Trail.
The Council shall not exceed 35
members and will be appointed by the
Secretary as follows:
a. The head of each Federal
department or independent agency
administering lands through which the
trail route passes, or a designee;
b. A member to represent each State
through which the trail passes, and such
appointments will be made from
recommendations of the Governors of
such States; and
c. One or more members to represent
private organizations, including
corporate and individual landowners
and land users, which, in the opinion of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43456-43459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17991]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2015-N087; FXRS282108E8PD0-156-F2013227943]
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards San
Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge; Draft Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact Report
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for public comments;
announcement of meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 43457]]
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), in
coordination with the California State Coastal Conservancy, announce
the availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (DEIS/EIR) for Phase 2 of the South Bay
Salt Pond (SBSP) Restoration Project at the Don Edwards San Francisco
Bay National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in Alameda, Santa Clara, and San
Mateo Counties, California. The DEIS/EIR, which we prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
describes and analyzes the alternatives identified for Phase 2 of the
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
September 22, 2015. A public meeting will be held on August 4, 2015
between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. (see ADDRESSES).
Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meeting should contact Ariel Ambruster, by
email at aambrust@ccp.csus.edu or by phone at 510-528-5006, at least 1
week in advance of the meeting to allow time to process the request.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You may obtain copies of the document
in the following places:
Internet: https://www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/phase2/.
In-Person:
[cir] San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex
Headquarters, 1 Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94555.
[cir] The following libraries:
[ssquf] Alviso Branch Library, 5050 N. First St., San Jose, CA
95002.
[ssquf] Biblioteca Latino America, 921 South First St., San Jose,
CA 95110.
[ssquf] California State University Library, 25800 Carlos Bee
Blvd., Hayward, CA 94542.
[ssquf] Fremont Main Library, 2400 Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA
94538.
[ssquf] Menlo Park Library, 800 Alma St., Menlo Park, CA 94025.
[ssquf] Mountain View Library, 585 Franklin St., Mountain View, CA
94041.
[ssquf] Rinconada Library, 1213 Newell Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303.
[ssquf] King Library, 150 E San Fernando St., San Jose, CA 95112.
[ssquf] Redwood City Main Library, 1044 Middlefield Road, Redwood
City, CA 94063.
[ssquf] San Mateo County East Palo Alto Library, 2415 University
Ave., East Palo Alto, CA 94303.
[ssquf] Santa Clara County Milpitas Library, 160 N Main St.,
Milpitas, CA 95035.
[ssquf] Santa Clara Public Library, 2635 Homestead Rd., Santa
Clara, CA 95051.
[ssquf] Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA
94086.
[ssquf] Natural Resources Library, U.S. Department of the Interior,
1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240-0001.
For how to view comments on the draft EIS from the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), or for information on EPA's role in the EIS
process, see EPA's Role in the EIS Process under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Submitting Comments: You may submit written comments by one of the
following methods:
Electronically: Send comments via email to
phase2comments@southbayrestoration.org. Your correspondence should
indicate which pond complex, alternative, or issue your comments
pertain to.
By Hard Copy: Send written comments to Anne Morkill,
Project Leader, Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge,
1 Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94555, or to Brenda Buxton, Project
Manager, State Coastal Conservancy, 1330 Broadway, 13th Floor, Oakland,
CA 94612.
By Fax: You may also send comments by facsimile to 510-
792-5828.
To have your name added to our mailing list, contact Ariel
Ambruster (see DATES).
Public Meeting: A public meeting will be held on August 4, 2015,
from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., at the Mountain View Community Center, located
at 201 S. Rengstorff Avenue, Mountain View, California 94040-1706.
Staff will be available to take comments and answer questions during
this time. The details of the public meeting will be posted on the SBSP
Restoration Project's Web site at https://www.southbayrestoration.org/events/. Meeting details will also be emailed to the Project's
Stakeholder Forum and to those interested parties who request to be
notified. Notification requests can be made by contacting the SBSP
Restoration Project's public outreach coordinator Ariel Ambruster (see
DATES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Morkill, Project Leader, USFWS,
510-792-0222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In coordination with the California State
Coastal Conservancy, we publish this notice to announce the
availability of a DEIS/EIR for Phase 2 of the SBSP Restoration Project
at the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay Refuge in Alameda, Santa Clara,
and San Mateo Counties, California. Phase 2 involves Ponds R3, R4, R5,
S5, A1, A2W, A8, A8S, A19, A20, and A21. The DEIS/EIR, which we
prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), describes and analyzes the alternatives identified for
Phase 2 of the SBSP Restoration Project. In addition to our publication
of this notice, EPA is publishing a notice announcing the draft CCP and
EIS, as required under section 309 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401
et seq.) The publication date of EPA's notice of availability is the
start of the public comment period for the draft EIS. Under the CAA,
EPA also must subsequently announce the final EIS via the Federal
Register.
EPA's Role in the EIS Process
The EPA is charged under section 309 of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 7401 et
seq.) to review all Federal agencies' environmental impact statements
(EISs) and to comment on the adequacy and the acceptability of the
environmental impacts of proposed actions in the EISs.
EPA also serves as the repository (EIS database) for EISs prepared
by Federal agencies and provides notice of their availability in the
Federal Register. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Database
provides information about EISs prepared by Federal agencies, as well
as EPA's comments concerning the EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA,
which publishes a notice of availability on Fridays in the Federal
Register.
The notice of availability is the start of the public comment
period for draft EISs, and the start of the 30-day ``wait period'' for
final EISs, during which agencies are generally required to wait 30
days before making a decision on a proposed action. For more
information, see https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. You
may search for EPA comments on EISs, along with EISs themselves, at
https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.
Background
In December 2007, the USFWS and the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife (CDFW) published a Final EIS/EIR for the SBSP Restoration
Project at the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay Refuge and the CDFW Eden
Landing Ecological Reserve (December 28, 2007; 72 FR 73799). The
overall south bay salt pond restoration area includes 15,100 acres that
the USFWS and the CDFW acquired from Cargill, Inc. in 2003. The lands
acquired from Cargill are divided into three pond complexes: The
Ravenswood Pond Complex, in San Mateo County, managed by the USFWS; the
Alviso Pond complex, also managed
[[Page 43458]]
by the USFWS, which is mostly in Santa Clara County, with five ponds in
Alameda County; and the Eden Landing Pond Complex, in Alameda County,
which is owned and managed by the CDFW. The SBSP Restoration Project
presented in the Final EIS/EIR was both programmatic, covering a 50-
year period, and project-level, addressing the specific components and
implementation of Phase 1.
In January 2008, we signed a Record of Decision selecting the Tidal
Emphasis Alternative (Alternative C) for implementation. This
alternative will result in 90 percent of the USFWS's ponds on the
Refuge being restored to tidal wetlands and 10 percent converted to
managed ponds. Under Phase 1 of Alternative C, we restored ponds E8A,
E8X, E9, E12, and E13 at the Eden Landing complex; A6, A8, A16, and A17
at the Alviso complex; and SF2 at the Ravenswood complex. We also added
several trails, interpretive features, and other recreational access
points. Construction was completed on the USFWS ponds in 2013.
We now propose restoration or enhancement of over 2,000 acres of
former salt ponds in the second phase of the SBSP Restoration Project.
In Phase 2 DEIS/EIR, we provide project-level analysis of proposed
restoration or enhancement of portions of the following three
geographically separate pond clusters: The Ravenswood Pond Complex (R3,
R4, R5, and S5), the Alviso Pond Complex-Mountain View Ponds (A1 and
A2W), the Alviso Pond Complex-A8 Ponds (A8 and A8S), and the Alviso
Pond Complex-Island Ponds (A19, A20, and A21). Some Phase 2
alternatives also include collaborative restoration and flood
management activities with non-USFWS landowners of adjacent lands and
managers of public infrastructures. Other Phase 2 alternatives do not
include these components. These pond clusters are illustrated in
Figures 1-5 on the SBSP Restoration Project Web site at https://www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/phase2/.
Phase 2 of the SBSP Restoration Project is intended to restore and
enhance tidal wetlands and managed pond habitats in South San Francisco
Bay while providing for flood management and wildlife-oriented public
access and recreation. In this Phase 2 document, we would continue
habitat restoration activities in both USFWS pond complexes, while also
providing recreation and public access opportunities and maintaining or
improving current levels of flood protection in the surrounding
communities. Phase 2 actions are also being planned for implementation
at the Eden Landing Pond Complex, which is owned and managed by the
CDFW as part of the Eden Landing Wildlife Sanctuary, but these actions
will be addressed under a separate process under the NEPA and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). We will address activities
at other ponds in subsequent phases.
Alternatives
We consider a range of alternatives and their impacts in the DEIS/
EIR, including No Action Alternatives for each group of ponds. The
range of alternatives includes varying approaches to restoring tidal
marshes (including number and location of breaches and other levee
modifications), habitat enhancements (islands, transition zones, and
channels), modifications to existing levees and berms to maintain or
improve flood protection, and recreation and public access components
(including trails, boardwalks, and viewing platforms) which correspond
to the project objectives.
The alternatives for each group of ponds (``pond cluster'') are
described below. The No Action Alternatives are described together,
followed by the Action Alternatives that are under consideration for
each pond cluster. In each group of ponds, each subsequently lettered
alternative usually has successively more components and greater
amounts of construction. Thus, at a given pond cluster, Alternative C
would involve more components that Alternative B, which has more than
Alternative A (No Action). One exception to this arrangement is at
Ravenswood, where there are three Action Alternatives and where the
defining feature of each alternative is not ``more components versus
fewer components'' but rather a different restoration goal for some of
the small ponds there.
Alviso-Island Ponds, Alviso-Mountain View Ponds, Alviso-A8 Ponds, and
Ravenswood Ponds--Alternatives A (No Action)
Under Alternatives Island A, Mountain View A, A8 A, and Ravenswood
A (the No Action Alternative at each of these pond clusters), no new
activities would be implemented as part of Phase 2. The pond clusters
would continue to be monitored and managed through the activities
described in the Adaptive Management Plan (AMP) and in accordance with
current USFWS practices.
Alviso Island Ponds
Alternative Island B
Alternative Island B would breach Pond A19's northern levee and
remove or lower levees between Ponds A19 and A20 to increase
connectivity and improve the ecological function of both ponds.
Alternative Island C
Alternative Island C would include the components of Alternative
Island B with the addition of levee breaches on the north sides of
Ponds A20 and A21, lowering of portions of levees around Pond A20,
pilot channels in Pond A19, and widening the existing breaches on the
southern levee of Pond A19.
Alviso-Mountain View Ponds
Alternative Mountain View B
Under Alternative Mountain View B, Ponds A1 and A2W levees would be
breached at several points to introduce tidal flow in the ponds.
Portions of Pond A1's western levee would be built up to maintain
current levels of flood protection provided by the pond itself. Habitat
transition zones and habitat islands would be constructed in the ponds
to increase habitat complexity and quality for special-status species.
A new trail and viewing platform would be installed to improve
recreation and public access at these ponds.
Alternative Mountain View C
Under Alternative Mountain View C, levees would be breached and
lowered to increase tidal flows in Pond A1, Pond A2W, and Charleston
Slough. The inclusion of Charleston Slough (by breaching and lowering
much of Pond A1's western levee) is the primary distinguishing feature
between Alternative Mountain View B and Alternative Mountain View C.
Several additional new trails and viewing platforms would be installed
or replaced to improve recreation and public access at the pond
cluster. To continue providing water to the City of Mountain View's
Shoreline Park sailing lake, a new water intake would be constructed at
the proposed breach between Pond A1 and Charleston Slough.
Alviso--A8 Ponds
Alternative A8 B
Alternative A8 B proposes the construction of habitat transition
zones in Pond A8S's southwest corner, southeast corner, or both,
depending on the amount of material available.
[[Page 43459]]
Ravenswood Ponds
Alternative Ravenswood B
Alternative Ravenswood B would open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood protection, create habitat
transition zone along the western edge of Pond R4, establish managed
ponds to improve habitat for diving and dabbling birds, increase pond
connectivity, and add a viewing platform to improve recreation and
public access.
Alternative Ravenswood C
Alternative Ravenswood C would be similar to Alternative Ravenswood
B, with the following exceptions: Ponds R5 and S5 would be converted to
a particular type of managed pond that is operated to maintain
intertidal mudflat elevation; water control structures would be
installed on Pond R3 to allow for improvement to the habitat for
western snowy plover; an additional habitat transition zone would be
constructed; and two public access and recreational trails and
additional viewing platforms would be constructed.
Alternative Ravenswood D
Alternative Ravenswood D would open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood protection, create two habitat
transition zones in Pond R4, establish enhanced managed ponds in Ponds
R5 and S5, increase pond connectivity, enhance Pond R3 for western
snowy plover habitat, remove the levees within and between Ponds R5 and
S5, and improve recreation and public access. Alternative Ravenswood D
would also allow temporary stormwater detention into Ponds R5 and S5
via connections with the City of Redwood City's Bayfront Canal and
Atherton Channel Project. This would treat a residual salinity problem
in Ponds R5 and S5.
NEPA Compliance
We are conducting environmental review in accordance with the
requirements of NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its
implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), other applicable
regulations, and our procedures for compliance with those regulations.
The DEIS/EIR discusses the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of
the alternatives on biological resources, cultural resources, water
quality, and other environmental resources. Measures to minimize
adverse environmental effects are identified and discussed in the DEIS/
EIR.
Public Comments
We request that you send comments only by one of the methods
described in ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment that includes personal
identifying information, you may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from public review. However, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
In addition to providing written comments, the public is encouraged
to attend a public meeting on August 4, 2015, to solicit comments on
the DEIS/EIR. The location of the public meeting is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. We will accept both oral and written comments at the
public meeting.
Ren Lohoefener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-17991 Filed 7-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
