Periodic Reporting, 43370-43371 [2015-17939]
Download as PDF
43370
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 933 (18 U.S.C. Chapter
223).
for which we would prepare a
Federalism Assessment.
■
Regulatory Flexibility Act
2. Revise § 550.50 to read as follows:
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation.
By approving it, the Director certifies
that it will not have a significant
economic impact upon a substantial
number of small entities because: This
proposed rule is about the correctional
management of offenders committed to
the custody of the Attorney General or
the Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
and its economic impact is limited to
the Bureau’s appropriated funds.
§ 550.50
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
§ 550.53 Residential Drug Abuse
Treatment Program (RDAP).
This proposed rule will not cause
State, local and tribal governments, or
the private sector, to spend
$100,000,000 or more in any one year,
and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. We do not
need to take action under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
(a) * * *
(1) Unit-based component. Inmates
must complete a course of activities
provided by the Psychology Services
Department in a treatment unit set apart
from the general prison population. This
component must last at least six
months.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Community Treatment Services
(CTS). Inmates who have completed the
unit-based program and (when
appropriate) the follow-up treatment
and transferred to a community-based
program must complete CTS to have
successfully completed RDAP and
receive incentives. The Warden, on the
basis of his or her discretion, may find
an inmate ineligible for participation in
a community-based program; therefore,
the inmate cannot complete RDAP.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Completing the unit-based
component of RDAP. To complete the
unit-based component of RDAP, inmates
must have satisfactory attendance and
participation in all RDAP activities.
(g) Expulsion from RDAP. (1) Inmates
may be removed from the program by
the Drug Abuse Program Coordinator
because of disruptive behavior related to
the program or unsatisfactory progress
in treatment.
(2) Ordinarily, inmates must be given
at least one formal warning before
removal from RDAP. A formal warning
is not necessary when the documented
lack of compliance with program
standards is of such magnitude that an
inmate’s continued presence would
create an immediate and ongoing
problem for staff and other inmates.
(3) We may return an inmate who
withdraws or is removed from RDAP to
his/her prior institution (if we had
transferred the inmate specifically to
participate in RDAP).
*
*
*
*
*
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed rule is not a major rule
as defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This proposed rule
would not result in an annual effect on
the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 550
Prisoners.
Charles E. Samuels, Jr.,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under the rulemaking authority
vested in the Attorney General in 5
U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510 and
delegated to the Director, Bureau of
Prisons in 28 CFR 0.96, we propose to
amend 28 CFR part 550 as follows:
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 550—DRUG PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 550
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3521–
3528, 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4046,
4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses
committed on or after November 1, 1987),
5006–5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984 as to
offenses committed after that date), 5039; 21
U.S.C. 848; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; Title V, Pub.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Purpose and scope.
The purpose of this subpart is to
describe the Bureau’s drug abuse
treatment programs for the inmate
population, to include drug abuse
education, non-residential drug abuse
treatment services, and residential drug
abuse treatment programs (RDAP).
These services are provided by
Psychology Services department.
■ 3. Amend § 550.53 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(3), (f), and (g) to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4. Revise § 550.55(b)(4) and (6) to read
as follows:
■
§ 550.55
Eligibility for early release.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Inmates who have a prior felony or
misdemeanor conviction within the ten
years prior to the date of sentencing for
their current commitment for:
(i) Homicide (including deaths caused
by recklessness, but not including
deaths caused by negligence or
justifiable homicide);
(ii) Forcible rape;
(iii) Robbery;
(iv) Aggravated assault;
(v) Arson;
(vi) Kidnaping; or
(vii) An offense that by its nature or
conduct involves sexual abuse offenses
committed upon minors;
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Inmates who have been convicted
of an attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation
to commit an underlying offense listed
in paragraph (b)(4) and/or (b)(5) of this
section; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Revise § 550.56 to read as follows:
§ 550.56
(CTS).
Community Treatment Services
(a) For inmates to successfully
complete all components of RDAP, they
must participate in CTS. If inmates
refuse or fail to complete CTS, they fail
RDAP and are disqualified for any
additional incentives.
(b) Inmates with a documented drug
use problem who did not choose to
participate in RDAP may be required to
participate in CTS as a condition of
participation in a community-based
program, with the approval of the
Supervisory Community Treatment
Services Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2015–17707 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR part 3050
[Docket No. RM2015–11; Order No. 2593]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing requesting
that the Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to analytical principles relating
to periodic reports (Proposal Three).
This notice informs the public of the
filing, invites public comment, and
takes other administrative steps.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Comments are due: August 31,
2015. Reply Comments are due:
September 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of Proposal
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Introduction
On July 14, 2015, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate an informal rulemaking
proceeding to consider a proposed
change in analytical principles relating
to periodic reports.1 A description of
Proposal Three is attached to the
Petition. Petition at 1. The Petition
identifies the proposed change as a
modification to the analytical method
used to estimate shape and weight for a
portion of the ‘‘Origin-Destination
Information System—Revenue, Pieces
and Weight’’ (ODIS–RPW) sampling
frame related to letter and card shaped
mailpieces. Id.
II. Summary of Proposal
The Postal Service explains that
ODIS–RPW is a probability-based
destinating mail sampling system that
primarily supplies the official
‘‘Revenue, Pieces and Weight By Class
and Special Services’’ (RPW) report
estimates of revenue, volume, and
weight for single-piece stamped and
metered mail. Id., Proposal Three at 4.
Currently, ODIS–RPW data collectors
travel to randomly selected Mail Exit
Points (MEPs) on randomly selected
days and manually sample mail as it
arrives at these locations. Id. These data
collectors record mail characteristics
from the sampled mail pieces, such as
revenue, volume, weight, mail class,
subclass, and indicia. Id.
Under Proposal Three, a portion of
MEPs would begin digitally capturing
the images of letter and card shaped
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service
Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a
Proposed Change in Analytical Principles (Proposal
Three), July 14, 2015 (Petition).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
mail from Delivery Barcode Sequencing
(DBCS) second pass operations. Id. at 3.
The remaining portion of MEPs would
continue to employ the existing manual
ODIS–RPW sampling techniques. Id. at
4–5. The Postal Service asserts that all
of the mail characteristics currently
collected from manually sampled
mailpieces can be collected from
digitally captured images of sampled
mailpieces, except for weight and shape.
Id. at 3. The Postal Service proposes to
use the weight and shape data from
those MEPs that continue to employ
manual sampling techniques as a
distribution key for the digitally
sampled mailpieces. Id. at 5.
The Postal Service plans to
implement the change in Proposal Three
beginning on January 1, 2016. Id. at 3.
The Postal Service asserts that the
proposed change would only impact
three mail categories: First-Class Mail
single-piece cards, First-Class Mail
single-piece stamped letters, and FirstClass Mail single-piece metered letters.
Id. at 5.
The Postal Service states that the
change in Proposal Three would have
very little impact on the business needs
that the ODIS–RPW system supports. Id.
at 10. Moreover, the Postal Service notes
that the changes in Proposal Three will
result in cost savings through the
elimination of travel time and on-site
work hours for ODIS–RPW data
collectors. Id. at 5 n.1.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2015–11 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition.
Additional information concerning the
Petition may be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.prc.gov. Interested persons may
submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal Three no later than August 31,
2015. Reply comments are due no later
than September 10, 2015. Pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 505, Katalin K. Clendenin is
designated as an officer of the
Commission to represent the interests of
the general public (Public
Representative) in this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2015–11 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service Requesting
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a
Proposed Change in Analytical
Principles (Proposal Three), filed July
14, 2015.
2. Comments are due no later than
August 31, 2015. Reply comments are
due no later than September 10, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43371
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Katalin K.
Clendenin to serve as Public
Representative in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–17939 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0268; FRL–9930–92–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; Control of Petroleum Liquid
Storage, Loading and Transfer
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of
Missouri. This revision includes
regulatory amendments that remove the
requirements of stage II vapor recovery
control systems at gasoline dispensing
facilities in the St. Louis area, revises
certification and testing procedures for
stage I vapor recovery systems, prohibits
above ground storage tanks at gasoline
dispensing facilities, and includes
general revisions to better clarify the
rule. These revisions to Missouri’s SIP
do not have an adverse effect on air
quality as demonstrated in Missouri’s
technical demonstration document and
EPA’s technical support demonstration
which is a part of this docket.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2015–0268, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: brown.steven@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery or Courier:
Steven Brown, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015–
0268. EPA’s policy is that all comments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43370-43371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17939]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR part 3050
[Docket No. RM2015-11; Order No. 2593]
Periodic Reporting
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing
requesting that the Commission initiate an informal rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to
periodic reports (Proposal Three). This notice informs the public of
the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative
steps.
[[Page 43371]]
DATES: Comments are due: August 31, 2015. Reply Comments are due:
September 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of Proposal
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On July 14, 2015, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant to
39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider a proposed change in analytical
principles relating to periodic reports.\1\ A description of Proposal
Three is attached to the Petition. Petition at 1. The Petition
identifies the proposed change as a modification to the analytical
method used to estimate shape and weight for a portion of the ``Origin-
Destination Information System--Revenue, Pieces and Weight'' (ODIS-RPW)
sampling frame related to letter and card shaped mailpieces. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service Requesting
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a Proposed Change in
Analytical Principles (Proposal Three), July 14, 2015 (Petition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of Proposal
The Postal Service explains that ODIS-RPW is a probability-based
destinating mail sampling system that primarily supplies the official
``Revenue, Pieces and Weight By Class and Special Services'' (RPW)
report estimates of revenue, volume, and weight for single-piece
stamped and metered mail. Id., Proposal Three at 4. Currently, ODIS-RPW
data collectors travel to randomly selected Mail Exit Points (MEPs) on
randomly selected days and manually sample mail as it arrives at these
locations. Id. These data collectors record mail characteristics from
the sampled mail pieces, such as revenue, volume, weight, mail class,
subclass, and indicia. Id.
Under Proposal Three, a portion of MEPs would begin digitally
capturing the images of letter and card shaped mail from Delivery
Barcode Sequencing (DBCS) second pass operations. Id. at 3. The
remaining portion of MEPs would continue to employ the existing manual
ODIS-RPW sampling techniques. Id. at 4-5. The Postal Service asserts
that all of the mail characteristics currently collected from manually
sampled mailpieces can be collected from digitally captured images of
sampled mailpieces, except for weight and shape. Id. at 3. The Postal
Service proposes to use the weight and shape data from those MEPs that
continue to employ manual sampling techniques as a distribution key for
the digitally sampled mailpieces. Id. at 5.
The Postal Service plans to implement the change in Proposal Three
beginning on January 1, 2016. Id. at 3. The Postal Service asserts that
the proposed change would only impact three mail categories: First-
Class Mail single-piece cards, First-Class Mail single-piece stamped
letters, and First-Class Mail single-piece metered letters. Id. at 5.
The Postal Service states that the change in Proposal Three would
have very little impact on the business needs that the ODIS-RPW system
supports. Id. at 10. Moreover, the Postal Service notes that the
changes in Proposal Three will result in cost savings through the
elimination of travel time and on-site work hours for ODIS-RPW data
collectors. Id. at 5 n.1.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2015-11 for consideration
of matters raised by the Petition. Additional information concerning
the Petition may be accessed via the Commission's Web site at https://www.prc.gov. Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal Three no later than August 31, 2015. Reply comments are due no
later than September 10, 2015. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Katalin K.
Clendenin is designated as an officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public (Public Representative) in this
proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2015-11 for
consideration of the matters raised by the Petition of the United
States Postal Service Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
a Proposed Change in Analytical Principles (Proposal Three), filed July
14, 2015.
2. Comments are due no later than August 31, 2015. Reply comments
are due no later than September 10, 2015.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Katalin K.
Clendenin to serve as Public Representative in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-17939 Filed 7-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P