Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and Transfer, 43371-43373 [2015-17853]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Comments are due: August 31,
2015. Reply Comments are due:
September 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of Proposal
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Introduction
On July 14, 2015, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate an informal rulemaking
proceeding to consider a proposed
change in analytical principles relating
to periodic reports.1 A description of
Proposal Three is attached to the
Petition. Petition at 1. The Petition
identifies the proposed change as a
modification to the analytical method
used to estimate shape and weight for a
portion of the ‘‘Origin-Destination
Information System—Revenue, Pieces
and Weight’’ (ODIS–RPW) sampling
frame related to letter and card shaped
mailpieces. Id.
II. Summary of Proposal
The Postal Service explains that
ODIS–RPW is a probability-based
destinating mail sampling system that
primarily supplies the official
‘‘Revenue, Pieces and Weight By Class
and Special Services’’ (RPW) report
estimates of revenue, volume, and
weight for single-piece stamped and
metered mail. Id., Proposal Three at 4.
Currently, ODIS–RPW data collectors
travel to randomly selected Mail Exit
Points (MEPs) on randomly selected
days and manually sample mail as it
arrives at these locations. Id. These data
collectors record mail characteristics
from the sampled mail pieces, such as
revenue, volume, weight, mail class,
subclass, and indicia. Id.
Under Proposal Three, a portion of
MEPs would begin digitally capturing
the images of letter and card shaped
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service
Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a
Proposed Change in Analytical Principles (Proposal
Three), July 14, 2015 (Petition).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
mail from Delivery Barcode Sequencing
(DBCS) second pass operations. Id. at 3.
The remaining portion of MEPs would
continue to employ the existing manual
ODIS–RPW sampling techniques. Id. at
4–5. The Postal Service asserts that all
of the mail characteristics currently
collected from manually sampled
mailpieces can be collected from
digitally captured images of sampled
mailpieces, except for weight and shape.
Id. at 3. The Postal Service proposes to
use the weight and shape data from
those MEPs that continue to employ
manual sampling techniques as a
distribution key for the digitally
sampled mailpieces. Id. at 5.
The Postal Service plans to
implement the change in Proposal Three
beginning on January 1, 2016. Id. at 3.
The Postal Service asserts that the
proposed change would only impact
three mail categories: First-Class Mail
single-piece cards, First-Class Mail
single-piece stamped letters, and FirstClass Mail single-piece metered letters.
Id. at 5.
The Postal Service states that the
change in Proposal Three would have
very little impact on the business needs
that the ODIS–RPW system supports. Id.
at 10. Moreover, the Postal Service notes
that the changes in Proposal Three will
result in cost savings through the
elimination of travel time and on-site
work hours for ODIS–RPW data
collectors. Id. at 5 n.1.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2015–11 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition.
Additional information concerning the
Petition may be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.prc.gov. Interested persons may
submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal Three no later than August 31,
2015. Reply comments are due no later
than September 10, 2015. Pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 505, Katalin K. Clendenin is
designated as an officer of the
Commission to represent the interests of
the general public (Public
Representative) in this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2015–11 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service Requesting
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a
Proposed Change in Analytical
Principles (Proposal Three), filed July
14, 2015.
2. Comments are due no later than
August 31, 2015. Reply comments are
due no later than September 10, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43371
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Katalin K.
Clendenin to serve as Public
Representative in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–17939 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0268; FRL–9930–92–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; Control of Petroleum Liquid
Storage, Loading and Transfer
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of
Missouri. This revision includes
regulatory amendments that remove the
requirements of stage II vapor recovery
control systems at gasoline dispensing
facilities in the St. Louis area, revises
certification and testing procedures for
stage I vapor recovery systems, prohibits
above ground storage tanks at gasoline
dispensing facilities, and includes
general revisions to better clarify the
rule. These revisions to Missouri’s SIP
do not have an adverse effect on air
quality as demonstrated in Missouri’s
technical demonstration document and
EPA’s technical support demonstration
which is a part of this docket.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2015–0268, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: brown.steven@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery or Courier:
Steven Brown, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015–
0268. EPA’s policy is that all comments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
43372
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket. All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. EPA
requests that you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Brown Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551–
7718, or by email at brown.steven@
epa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jul 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed?
EPA proposes to approve the SIP
revision submitted by the state of
Missouri that removes the requirements
of stage II vapor recovery control
systems at gasoline dispensing facilities
in the St. Louis area including minor
revisions to the rule as described below.
On November 20, 2014, MDNR
submitted a request to revise the SIP to
include the following revision to
Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10–5.220,
‘‘Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage,
Loading and Transfer’’: (1) Removes the
requirements of stage II vapor recovery
control systems at gasoline dispensing
facilities in the St. Louis area, (2) revises
certification and testing procedures for
the remaining stage I systems consistent
with California Air Resources Board
(CARB) vapor recovery requirements
instead of the Missouri Performance
Evaluation and Test Procedures
(MOPETP), (3) the prohibition of above
ground storage tanks at gasoline
dispensing facilities, and (4) general text
revisions to better clarify the rule.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, as
explained in this proposed action, the
revisions meet the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110(l) and section 193 and
implementing regulations. EPA has
determined that the revisions meet all
applicable CAA regulations, policy and
guidance as detailed in EPA Technical
Support Document and Missouri’s
technical support documentation which
is part of this docket.
III. What action is EPA taking?
We are processing this as a proposed
action because we are soliciting
comments on this proposed action.
Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the Missouri Regulation ‘‘Control of
Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and
Transfer’’ described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
for more information).
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under the terms of Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993) and is therefore not subject to
review under Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
43373
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 140 / Wednesday, July 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320(c), the table is
amended by revising the entry for 10–
5.220 to read as follows:
Dated: June 29, 2015.
Mark Hague,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
■
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 52 as set forth below:
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of Plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA Approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
*
*
10–5.220 ......................................
*
*
*
Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and Transfer.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–17853 Filed 7–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0212; FRL–9929–12]
RIN 2070–ZA16
Aldicarb, Alternaria destruens,
Ampelomyces quisqualis, Azinphosmethyl, Etridiazole, Fenarimol, et al.;
Proposed Tolerance and Tolerance
Exemption Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing, in followup to canceled product registrations or
uses, to revoke certain tolerances for
acephate, aldicarb, azinphos-methyl,
etridiazole, fenarimol, imazamethabenzmethyl, tepraloxydim, thiacloprid,
thiazopyr, and tralkoxydim, and
tolerance exemptions for certain
pesticide active ingredients. Also, EPA
is proposing to make minor revisions to
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jul 21, 2015
*
Jkt 235001
*
07/21/14
*
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
*
*
Sfmt 4702
*
*
07/22/15 [Insert Federal
Register citation].
the section heading and introductory
text for Pythium oligandrum DV 74. In
addition, in accordance with current
Agency practice, EPA is proposing to
make minor revisions to the tolerance
expression for imazamethabenz-methyl,
and remove expired tolerances and
tolerance exemptions for certain
pesticide active ingredients.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0212, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
PO 00000
*
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8037; email address:
nevola.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43371-43373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17853]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0268; FRL-9930-92-Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and Transfer
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
state of Missouri. This revision includes regulatory amendments that
remove the requirements of stage II vapor recovery control systems at
gasoline dispensing facilities in the St. Louis area, revises
certification and testing procedures for stage I vapor recovery
systems, prohibits above ground storage tanks at gasoline dispensing
facilities, and includes general revisions to better clarify the rule.
These revisions to Missouri's SIP do not have an adverse effect on air
quality as demonstrated in Missouri's technical demonstration document
and EPA's technical support demonstration which is a part of this
docket.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2015-0268, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: brown.steven@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery or Courier: Steven Brown, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2015-0268. EPA's policy is that all comments
[[Page 43372]]
received will be included in the public docket without change and may
be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket. All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219. EPA requests that you contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in
advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Brown Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7718, or by email at
brown.steven@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed?
EPA proposes to approve the SIP revision submitted by the state of
Missouri that removes the requirements of stage II vapor recovery
control systems at gasoline dispensing facilities in the St. Louis area
including minor revisions to the rule as described below.
On November 20, 2014, MDNR submitted a request to revise the SIP to
include the following revision to Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10-5.220,
``Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and Transfer'': (1)
Removes the requirements of stage II vapor recovery control systems at
gasoline dispensing facilities in the St. Louis area, (2) revises
certification and testing procedures for the remaining stage I systems
consistent with California Air Resources Board (CARB) vapor recovery
requirements instead of the Missouri Performance Evaluation and Test
Procedures (MOPETP), (3) the prohibition of above ground storage tanks
at gasoline dispensing facilities, and (4) general text revisions to
better clarify the rule.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained in this proposed action, the revisions meet the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110(l) and
section 193 and implementing regulations. EPA has determined that the
revisions meet all applicable CAA regulations, policy and guidance as
detailed in EPA Technical Support Document and Missouri's technical
support documentation which is part of this docket.
III. What action is EPA taking?
We are processing this as a proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the Missouri Regulation ``Control of Petroleum Liquid
Storage, Loading and Transfer'' described in the proposed amendments to
40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms
of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human
[[Page 43373]]
health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally
permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 29, 2015.
Mark Hague,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320(c), the table is amended by revising the entry for
10-5.220 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of Plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA Approval date Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 5--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-5.220.......................... Control of Petroleum 07/21/14 07/22/15 [Insert Federal Register
Liquid Storage, citation].
Loading and Transfer.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-17853 Filed 7-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
