Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Establish an Information Collection, 42843-42845 [2015-17698]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Notices
confidence to the agency. In accordance
with the determination of the Chairman
of February 15, 2012, these sessions will
be closed to the public pursuant to
subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title
5, United States Code.
Dated: July 14, 2015.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for
the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015–17679 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Sunshine Act Meetings; National
Science Board
The National Science Board’s
Committee on Strategy and Budget
(CSB), pursuant to NSF regulations (45
CFR part 614), the National Science
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C.
1862n–5), and the Government in the
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby
gives notice of the scheduling of a
teleconference for the transaction of
National Science Board business, as
follows:
DATE & TIME: Tuesday July 28, 2015 at
3:00–4:00 p.m. EDT.
SUBJECT MATTER: Discussion of the
NSF’s FT 2017 budget development.
STATUS: Closed.
This meeting will be held by
teleconference. Please refer to the
National Science Board Web site for
additional information and schedule
updates (time, place, subject matter or
status of meeting), which may be found
at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/.
Point of contact for this meeting is Elise
Lipkowitz (elipkowi@nsf.gov).
Dated: July 16, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2015–17868 Filed 7–16–15; 4:15 pm]
proposed continuing information
collection.
Comments are invited on whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Foundation,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Foundation’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of
information; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by September 18,
2015, to be assured consideration.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent practicable.
Send comments to address below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265,
Arlington, Virginia 22230; telephone
(703) 292–7556; or send email to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339, which is accessible 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a
year (including federal holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Community
College Innovation Challenge
Information Collection.
OMB Number: 3145—NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to establish an information
collection for post-challenge outcome
monitoring system.
Abstract
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
Proposed Project
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To
Establish an Information Collection
National Science Foundation.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, the
National Science Foundation (NSF) is
inviting the general public or other
Federal agencies to comment on this
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
NSF provides nearly 20 percent of
federal funding for basic research to
academic institutions.1 The Office of
Legislative and Public Affairs (OLPA)
communicates information about the
activities, programs, research results
and policies of NSF. OLPA employs a
wide variety of tools and techniques to
engage the general public and selected
audiences including Congress, the news
media, state and local governments,
other Federal agencies, and the research
and education communities. To these
1 National Science Foundation. (2012). NSF at a
glance. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/about/
glance.jsp.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42843
ends, OLPA provides support for
innovative new initiatives designed to
increase public engagement and
scientific progress. An important aspect
of scientific progress is the education of
future scientists. Improvements in
science, technology, engineering and
mathematics (STEM) curricula,
particularly changes that engage
students in the process of research and
discovery, have become a focal point for
attracting more students into science.
Undergraduate research is a significant
strategy for improving undergraduate
STEM education.
Community colleges prepare
technicians who will become an integral
part of research efforts and students
who will continue their education at
four-year institutions. Further, they play
a significant role in the preparation of
underrepresented groups in science.
Community colleges have long
recognized the importance of mentoring
students and have a history of success
in educating underrepresented students
for successful careers in STEM. Thus,
community colleges play an important
role in workforce development in their
states and local communities. Industry
frequently looks to community colleges
to provide an educated and
technologically up-to-date workforce.
The National Science Foundation’s
(NSF) thrust of incorporating research
into the traditional teaching mission of
the community college is a relatively
new expansion of its mission. This
challenge furthers NSF’s mission by
enabling students to discover and
demonstrate their capacity to use
science to make a difference in the
world, and to transfer knowledge into
action.
The Office of Legislative and Public
Affairs (OLPA) requests of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) an
approval for an information collection
intended to monitor outputs, short-term,
intermediate and long term outcomes of
OLPA’s new Community College
Innovation Challenge.
The survey questionnaire,
individually tailored to measure outputs
and outcomes for this initiative, will
provide essential information for
program monitoring purposes. Data
collected by this collection will be used
for program planning, management, and
evaluation. A summary of monitoring
data can be used to respond to queries
from Congress, the public, NSF’s
external merit reviewers who serve as
advisors, including Committees of
Visitors (COVs), and NSF’s Office of the
Inspector General. These data are
needed for effective administration,
program and project monitoring,
evaluation, and for measuring
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
42844
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Notices
attainment of NSF’s program and
strategic goals, as identified by the
President’s Accountable Government
Initiative, the Government Performance
and Results Act (GPRA) Modernization
Act of 2010, and NSF’s Strategic Plan.
The collection included in this request
is designed to assist in management of
the CCIC and to serve as a data resource
for current and future initiative
evaluations.
This data collection effort will enable
OLPA to longitudinally monitor outputs
and outcomes given the unique goals
and purpose of the CCIC. This is very
important to enable appropriate and
entrepreneurship activities among other
indicators.
Use of the Information: The data
collected will be used for NSF internal
reports, historical data, program level
studies and evaluations, and for
securing future funding for the CCIC
program maintenance and growth.
These data could be used for program
evaluation purposes if deemed
necessary. Evaluation designs could
make use of metadata associated with
the contest, and other characteristics to
identify a comparison group to evaluate
the impact of the program funding and
other interesting research questions.
accurate evidence-based management of
the program and to determine whether
or not the specific goals of the program
are being met.
Participants will be invited to submit
this information via data collection
methods that include but are not limited
to online surveys, interviews, phone
interviews, etc. The indicators are both
quantitative and descriptive and may
include number of students majoring in
STEM disciplines or joining the STEM
workforce, faculty expressions of
mentoring ability for STEM careers,
number of participants continuing to
participate in innovation or
ESTIMATE OF BURDEN
Annual
number of
responses/
respondent
Number of
respondents
Collection title
Annual hour
burden
Community College Innovation Challenge Monitoring Collection .............................................
410
.25
.1
Total ....................................................................................................................................
410
.25
10.25
Below is an example that shows how
the hour burden was estimated for the
monitoring system.
The estimated average number of
annual respondents is 410, with an
estimated annual response burden of
10.25 hours. For post-award monitoring
systems, OLPA expects to collect data at
6 months 1, 3, and 8 years postchallenge, in order to have the best
chance of capturing the more immediate
outcomes expected by ∼1 year postchallenge, intermediate outcomes at 3
years post-challenge, and long-term
outcomes/impacts at 8 years post
challenge. These four (4) data
collections spread over the span of 10
years; this averages to 0.25 data
collections/year. The community
college population may transition
relatively quickly to another school or to
the workforce and we might expect a
shorter and more condensed timeline of
outcomes and impacts. Thus, we wish
to collect data at 6 months and one year
after the challenge, and then once
annually at 3 and 8 years post-award.
Respondents
The respondents are faculty mentors
and community college students.
Estimates of Annualized Cost to
Respondents for the Hour Burdens
The overall annualized cost to the
respondents is estimated to be $8,800.
The following table shows the
annualized estimate of costs to faculty
Number of
respondents
Respondent type
Faculty Mentors ...............................................................................................
Students ...........................................................................................................
Estimated Number of Responses per
Report
mentor respondents, who are
community college professors. This
estimated hourly rate is based on a
report from the American Association of
University Professors, ‘‘Annual Report
on the Economic Status of the
Profession, 2014–15,’’ Academe,
March–April 2015, Survey Report Table
4. According to this report, the average
salary of an associate professor across
all types of associate’s degree granting
institutions (public, privateindependent) was $62,221. When
divided by the number of standard
annual work hours (2,080), this
calculates to approximately $30 per
hour. For the students, due to the broad
range of employment levels, we
estimated an average hourly rate of $20.
Burden
hours per
respondent
60
350
Average
hourly rate
1
1
$30
20
Estimated
annual cost
$1,800
7,000
table below shows the total universe
and sample size for the collections.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Data collection involves all finalists
and semifinalists in the challenge. The
RESPONDENT UNIVERSE AND SAMPLE SIZE OF CCIC INFORMATION COLLECTIONS
Collection title
Universe of
respondents
Sample size
Community College Innovation Challenge Monitoring Collection ...........................................................................
410
410
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Notices
Dated: July 15, 2015.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2015–17698 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2015–0001]
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
DATE:
July 20, 27, August 3, 10, 17, 24,
2015.
Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
PLACE:
Week of July 20, 2015
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of July 20, 2015.
Week of July 27, 2015—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of July 27, 2015.
Week of August 3, 2015—Tentative
Thursday, August 6, 2015
9:30 a.m. Strategic Programmatic
Overview of the Operating Reactors
Business Line (Public Meeting)
(Contact: Nathan Sanfilippo: 301–
415–8744)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
1:00 p.m. Discussion of Management
and Personnel Issues (Closed—Ex. 2
& 6)
Week of August 10, 2015—Tentative
Thursday, August 13, 2015
9:00 a.m. Briefing on Greater-ThanClass-C Low-Level Radioactive
Waste (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Gregory Suber—301–415–8087)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
Week of August 17, 2015—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 17, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Week of August 24, 2015—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 24, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. For more information or to verify
the status of meetings, contact Glenn
Ellmers at 301–415–0442 or via email at
Glenn.Ellmers@nrc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability
Program Manager, at 301–287–0727, by
videophone at 240–428–3217, or by
email at Kimberly.MeyerChambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
Members of the public may request to
receive this information electronically.
If you would like to be added to the
distribution, please contact the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301–
415–1969), or email
Brenda.Akstulewicz@nrc.gov or
Patricia.Jimenez@nrc.gov.
Dated: July 16, 2015.
Richard J. Laufer,
Technical Coordinator, Office of the
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–17823 Filed 7–16–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 052–00027 and 052–00028;
NRC–2008–0441]
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station,
Units 2 and 3
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application;
opportunity to comment, request a
hearing, and petition for leave to
intervene; correction.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice
that was published in the Federal
Register on July 9, 2015, that gave
notice to the public that it is considering
issuance of an amendment to Combined
Licenses (NPF–93 and NPF–94), issued
to South Carolina Electric and Gas
(SCE&G) and South Carolina Public
Service Authority, for construction and
operation of the Virgil C. Summer
Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3 located
in Fairfield County, South Carolina.
This action is being taken to correct the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
42845
date by which a request for a hearing or
a petition for leave to intervene must be
filed.
This correction is effective on
July 20, 2015.
DATES:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0441 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this action. You
may obtain publicly-available
information related to this action using
any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0441. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise McGovern, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–0681; email:
Denise.Mcgovern@nrc.gov.
In the
Federal Register of July 9, 2015 (80 FR
39450), in FR Doc. 2015–16797, on page
39450, third column, the DATES Section
should be revised to read as follows:
‘‘Submit comments by August 10, 2015.
Request for a hearing or petition for
leave to intervene must be filed by
September 8, 2015.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 14th
day of July, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy Bladey,
Branch Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch, Division of Administration
Services, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–17677 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42843-42845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17698]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Establish an Information
Collection
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation
(NSF) is inviting the general public or other Federal agencies to
comment on this proposed continuing information collection.
Comments are invited on whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Foundation, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Foundation's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by September
18, 2015, to be assured consideration. Comments received after that
date will be considered to the extent practicable. Send comments to
address below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, Virginia 22230; telephone (703) 292-7556; or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (including federal
holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Community College Innovation Challenge
Information Collection.
OMB Number: 3145--NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not applicable.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to establish an
information collection for post-challenge outcome monitoring system.
Abstract
Proposed Project
NSF provides nearly 20 percent of federal funding for basic
research to academic institutions.\1\ The Office of Legislative and
Public Affairs (OLPA) communicates information about the activities,
programs, research results and policies of NSF. OLPA employs a wide
variety of tools and techniques to engage the general public and
selected audiences including Congress, the news media, state and local
governments, other Federal agencies, and the research and education
communities. To these ends, OLPA provides support for innovative new
initiatives designed to increase public engagement and scientific
progress. An important aspect of scientific progress is the education
of future scientists. Improvements in science, technology, engineering
and mathematics (STEM) curricula, particularly changes that engage
students in the process of research and discovery, have become a focal
point for attracting more students into science. Undergraduate research
is a significant strategy for improving undergraduate STEM education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ National Science Foundation. (2012). NSF at a glance.
Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/about/glance.jsp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community colleges prepare technicians who will become an integral
part of research efforts and students who will continue their education
at four-year institutions. Further, they play a significant role in the
preparation of underrepresented groups in science. Community colleges
have long recognized the importance of mentoring students and have a
history of success in educating underrepresented students for
successful careers in STEM. Thus, community colleges play an important
role in workforce development in their states and local communities.
Industry frequently looks to community colleges to provide an educated
and technologically up-to-date workforce. The National Science
Foundation's (NSF) thrust of incorporating research into the
traditional teaching mission of the community college is a relatively
new expansion of its mission. This challenge furthers NSF's mission by
enabling students to discover and demonstrate their capacity to use
science to make a difference in the world, and to transfer knowledge
into action.
The Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (OLPA) requests of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) an approval for an information
collection intended to monitor outputs, short-term, intermediate and
long term outcomes of OLPA's new Community College Innovation
Challenge.
The survey questionnaire, individually tailored to measure outputs
and outcomes for this initiative, will provide essential information
for program monitoring purposes. Data collected by this collection will
be used for program planning, management, and evaluation. A summary of
monitoring data can be used to respond to queries from Congress, the
public, NSF's external merit reviewers who serve as advisors, including
Committees of Visitors (COVs), and NSF's Office of the Inspector
General. These data are needed for effective administration, program
and project monitoring, evaluation, and for measuring
[[Page 42844]]
attainment of NSF's program and strategic goals, as identified by the
President's Accountable Government Initiative, the Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Modernization Act of 2010, and NSF's
Strategic Plan. The collection included in this request is designed to
assist in management of the CCIC and to serve as a data resource for
current and future initiative evaluations.
This data collection effort will enable OLPA to longitudinally
monitor outputs and outcomes given the unique goals and purpose of the
CCIC. This is very important to enable appropriate and accurate
evidence-based management of the program and to determine whether or
not the specific goals of the program are being met.
Participants will be invited to submit this information via data
collection methods that include but are not limited to online surveys,
interviews, phone interviews, etc. The indicators are both quantitative
and descriptive and may include number of students majoring in STEM
disciplines or joining the STEM workforce, faculty expressions of
mentoring ability for STEM careers, number of participants continuing
to participate in innovation or entrepreneurship activities among other
indicators.
Use of the Information: The data collected will be used for NSF
internal reports, historical data, program level studies and
evaluations, and for securing future funding for the CCIC program
maintenance and growth. These data could be used for program evaluation
purposes if deemed necessary. Evaluation designs could make use of
metadata associated with the contest, and other characteristics to
identify a comparison group to evaluate the impact of the program
funding and other interesting research questions.
Estimate of Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual number
Collection title Number of of responses/ Annual hour
respondents respondent burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community College Innovation Challenge Monitoring Collection.... 410 .25 .1
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 410 .25 10.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is an example that shows how the hour burden was estimated
for the monitoring system.
The estimated average number of annual respondents is 410, with an
estimated annual response burden of 10.25 hours. For post-award
monitoring systems, OLPA expects to collect data at 6 months 1, 3, and
8 years post-challenge, in order to have the best chance of capturing
the more immediate outcomes expected by ~1 year post-challenge,
intermediate outcomes at 3 years post-challenge, and long-term
outcomes/impacts at 8 years post challenge. These four (4) data
collections spread over the span of 10 years; this averages to 0.25
data collections/year. The community college population may transition
relatively quickly to another school or to the workforce and we might
expect a shorter and more condensed timeline of outcomes and impacts.
Thus, we wish to collect data at 6 months and one year after the
challenge, and then once annually at 3 and 8 years post-award.
Respondents
The respondents are faculty mentors and community college students.
Estimates of Annualized Cost to Respondents for the Hour Burdens
The overall annualized cost to the respondents is estimated to be
$8,800. The following table shows the annualized estimate of costs to
faculty mentor respondents, who are community college professors. This
estimated hourly rate is based on a report from the American
Association of University Professors, ``Annual Report on the Economic
Status of the Profession, 2014-15,'' Academe, March-April 2015, Survey
Report Table 4. According to this report, the average salary of an
associate professor across all types of associate's degree granting
institutions (public, private-independent) was $62,221. When divided by
the number of standard annual work hours (2,080), this calculates to
approximately $30 per hour. For the students, due to the broad range of
employment levels, we estimated an average hourly rate of $20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden hours
Respondent type Number of per Average Estimated
respondents respondent hourly rate annual cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faculty Mentors................................. 60 1 $30 $1,800
Students........................................ 350 1 20 7,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Number of Responses per Report
Data collection involves all finalists and semifinalists in the
challenge. The table below shows the total universe and sample size for
the collections.
Respondent Universe and Sample Size of CCIC Information Collections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Universe of
Collection title respondents Sample size
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community College Innovation Challenge 410 410
Monitoring Collection................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 42845]]
Dated: July 15, 2015.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2015-17698 Filed 7-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
