Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to the New Source Review State Implementation Plan; Flexible Permit Program, 42727-42730 [2015-17472]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
documents generally available
electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 18, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.
Dated: June 19, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.720 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(205) to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 52.720
42727
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(205) On May 16, 2013, and August
18, 2014, Illinois submitted variances to
its regional haze state implementation
plan affecting the following Midwest
Generation, LLC facilities: Crawford
Generating Station (Cook County), Joliet
Generating Station (Will County),
Powerton Generating Station (Tazewell
County), Waukegan Generating Station
(Lake County), and Will County
Generating Station (Will County).
(i) Incorporation by Reference. (A)
Illinois Pollution Control Board Order
PCB 12–121, adopted on August 23,
2012; Certificate of Acceptance, dated
August 24, 2012, filed with the Illinois
Pollution Control Board Clerk’s Office
August 27, 2012.
(B) Illinois Pollution Control Board
Order PCB 13–24, adopted on April 4,
2013; Certificate of Acceptance, dated
May 16, 2013, filed with the Illinois
Pollution Control Board Clerk’s Office
May 17, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2015–17662 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0542; FRL–9930–44–
Region–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revisions to the New Source Review
State Implementation Plan; Flexible
Permit Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is fully approving
revisions to the Texas New Source
Review (NSR) State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to establish the Texas Minor
NSR Flexible Permits Program (FPP),
submitted by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The
approval was predicated on the TCEQ
meeting its commitment outlined in its
letter dated December 9, 2013, to adopt
certain minor clarifications to the
Flexible Permit Program (FPP) by
November 30, 2014. The TCEQ
submitted the revised program rules to
meet its commitment on July 31, 2014.
The EPA is finalizing this action under
section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule will be effective
August 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
42728
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0542. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available.
E.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information the disclosure of
which is restricted by the statute.
Certain other material such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Permits Section (6PD–R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some
information may be publicly available
only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material), and some may
not be publicly available at either
location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Stephanie Kordzi, telephone 214–665–
7520; email address kordzi.stephanie@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. When is this action effective?
IV. Final Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 14, 2014, the EPA took final
rulemaking action conditionally
approving revisions to the Texas NSR
SIP to establish the Texas Minor NSR
Flexible Permits Program, submitted by
the TCEQ. The EPA’s proposed
conditional approval was published in
79 FR 8368, February 12, 2014. The
conditional approval was predicated on
a commitment from TCEQ in a letter
dated December 9, 2013, to adopt
certain minor clarifications to the FPP
by November 30, 2014. (79 FR 40666,
July 14, 2014).
On September 12, 2014,
Environmental Integrity Project, et al.,
filed a Petition for Review challenging
the EPA conditional approval of the FPP
with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The U.S. Department of Justice
submitted the response to the Petition,
Case No. 14–60649, for the EPA on
March 2, 2015. The Appeal is on-going
as of the date of publication of this
notice.
On July 31, 2014, the TCEQ submitted
revisions to the Texas NSR SIP. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
rulemaking properly structured the
rules within and according to the
rulemaking requirements of the Texas
Administrative Procedure Act and the
Texas Administrative Code. The EPA
proposed full approval of the FPP (79
FR 7875, December 31, 2014) based on
its determination that the SIP revisions
complied with section 110(k) of the
Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA)
and was consistent with the EPA’s
regulations and policies. These
revisions supported this action to
convert the approved conditional FPP to
a fully approved FPP. The EPA
reopened the public notice period for an
additional 30 days (80 FR 21199, April
17, 2015), due to items being
inadvertently omitted from the docket
during the public notice period
beginning December 31, 2014.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA proposed an initial comment
period of 30 days. We received
comments from 3 organizations during
the initial comment period as follows:
The TCEQ, Baker Botts, and the
Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) on
behalf of the Environmental Justice
Advocacy Services, Community in
Power & Development Association,
Citizens for Environmental Justice, Air
Alliance Houston, Texas Campaign for
the Environment, and the Texas Impact.
All comments previously submitted
under the first public notice for this
action are being responded to as
appropriate and the commenters were
informed that they did not need to
resubmit them during the reopened
public notice period. The EPA did not
receive any additional comments during
the reopened public notice period. All
comment letters can be found in their
entirety in the docket for this
rulemaking.
Comment 1: Baker Botts stated they
supported EPA’s proposed approval of
the Texas FPP. They believe it complies
with the federal Clean Air Act. Further
they believe that flexible permits are an
essential part of the Texas air quality
permitting program and the program has
contributed to marked and sustained
improvements in Texas air quality. They
submitted information from TCEQ’s
Web site which documents reductions
in ozone and other pollutants in Texas.
Response 1: The EPA appreciates the
support for our final approval. No
changes were made to the final rule as
a result of this comment.
Comment 2: The TCEQ concurs with
the EPA’s proposed determination that
the TCEQ fulfilled its December 9, 2013,
commitment to submit the FPP SIP
revision. The TCEQ also concurs with
EPA’s proposed finding that the TCEQ
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
has satisfied all the elements of the
EPA’s final conditional approval (79 FR
40666, July 14, 2014). The TCEQ
submitted on July 31, 2014, the
following rules: 30 TAC Sections
116.13, 116.710, 116.711(1), (2)(A)(B)
and (C)(i) and (ii), (D)–(J), and (L)–(N);
116.715(a)–(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B);
116.716; 116.717; 116.718; 116.721; and
116.765.
Response 2: The EPA appreciates the
support for our final approval of the
rule. No changes were made to the final
rule as a result of this comment.
Comment 3: The EIP stated the
following: ‘‘this full approval action is
non-substantive, it is not the agency
action we seek to, or intend to,
challenge.’’ EIP did resubmit their April
4, 2014, comments on the proposed
conditional approval (Attachment A),
and their January 27, 2015, Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals brief (Attachment B).
Response 3: The EIP did not submit
comments on the substance of this
action, which addressed the rules being
properly structured within and
according to the rulemaking
requirements of the Texas
Administrative Procedure Act and the
Texas Administrative Code. The EPA
addressed the April 4, 2014, comments
that the EIP resubmitted in its response
to comments contained in the final
conditional approval. (79 FR 40666, July
14, 2014). Further, the Brief of
Respondent U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Case No. 14–60649,
filed on March 2, 2015, replies to the
issues raised by EIP in its January 27,
2015, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
brief. EPA is incorporating by reference
the EPA’s Reply Brief in this response
to the EIP’s resubmitted comments. It
can be found in the Docket to this
action.
III. When is this action effective?
The EPA has determined that today’s
final approval of the Texas FPP is
subject to the requirement to delay a
rule’s effective date until 30 days after
publication in 5 U.S.C. 553(d) of the
APA; therefore, the rule, will become
effective 30 days after publication.
IV. Final Action
After careful consideration of
submitted revisions to meet the
requirements of the conditional
approval and of the comments received
and the responses to each comment
provided above, and under section 110
of the Act, the EPA is finalizing our
proposal to convert the conditional
approval of the FPP to a full, final
action. Further, we have found it
complies with section 110(l) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
We are making the following revisions
to the Texas SIP:
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.13—Flexible Permit Definitions.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.710—Applicability.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.711(1), (2)(A), (B) and (C)(i) and (ii),
(D)–(J), and (L)–(N)—Flexible Permit
Application.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.715(a)–(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B)—
General and Special Conditions.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.716—Emission Caps and Individual
Emission Limitations.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.717—Implementation Schedule for
Additional Controls.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.718—Significant Emission Increase.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.720—Limitation of Physical and
Operational Changes.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.721—Amendments and Alterations.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.740(a)—Public Notice.
• Revisions to 30 TAC Section
116.750—Flexible Permit Fee. Revisions
to 30 TAC Section 116.765—
Compliance Schedule.
The EPA has determined that the
revised rule satisfies the December 9,
2013, Commitment Letter which was
submitted in a timely manner.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, we are finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
revisions to the Texas regulations as
described in the Final Action section
above. We have made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the EPA Region 6 office.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
See, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42729
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 18,
2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposed of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 30, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. In § 52.2270(c), the table titled
‘‘EPA Approved Regulations in the
Texas SIP’’ is amended by revising the
entries for sections 116.13, 116.710,
116,711, 116.715, 116.716, 116.717,
116.718, 116.720, 116.721, 116.740,
116.750, and 116.765 to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2270
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
*
*
42730
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP
State
citation
State
approval/
Submittal date
Title/Subject
*
*
*
EPA Approval date
*
Explanation
*
*
*
Chapter 116 (Reg 6)—Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification
Subchapter A—Definitions
*
Section 116.13 .....
*
*
Flexible Permit Definitions ...........
*
*
*
*
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter G—Flexible Permits
Section 116.710 ...
Applicability ..................................
7/31/2014
Section 116.711 ...
Flexible Permit Application ..........
7/31/2014
*
Section 116.715 ...
*
*
General and Special Conditions ..
Section 116.716 ...
Emission Caps and Individual
Emission Limitations.
Implementation Schedule for Additional Controls.
Significant Emission Increase ......
*
*
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal
ister citation].
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal
ister citation].
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal
ister citation].
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal
ister citation].
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal
ister citation].
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal
ister citation].
Section 116.717 ...
Section 116.718 ...
Section 116.720 ...
Section 116.721 ...
Limitation on Physical and Operational Changes.
Amendments and Alterations .......
*
Section 116.740 ...
*
*
Public Notice and Comment ........
Section 116.750 ...
Flexible Permit Fee ......................
*
Section 116.765 ...
*
*
Compliance Schedule ..................
*
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0027; FRL–9930–79–
Region–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas; Low
Reid Vapor Pressure Fuel Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Jul 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
Direct final rule.
The EPA is taking a direct
final action to approve revisions to the
Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP)
related to Low Reid Vapor Pressure
(RVP) Fuel Regulations that were
submitted by the State of Texas on
January 5, 2015. The EPA evaluated the
SIP submittal from Texas and
determined these revisions are
consistent with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). The EPA
is approving this action under the
federal CAA.
This direct final rule is effective
on September 18, 2015 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives relevant
PO 00000
RegRegReg-
*
DATES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Reg-
*
*
SIP includes 30 TAC Section
116.765(b) and (c).
SUMMARY:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Reg-
*
*
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].
[FR Doc. 2015–17472 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
*
SIP includes 30 TAC 116.715(a)–
(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B)
*
*
SIP includes 30 TAC Section
116.740(a).
*
ACTION:
Reg-
SIP includes 30 TAC 116.711(1),
(2)(A), (B) and (C)(i) and (ii),
(D)–(J), and (L)–(N)
*
*
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].
7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].
7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
adverse comment August 19, 2015. If
the EPA receives such comment, the
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the
public that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2015–0027, by one of the
following methods:
(1) www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions.
(2) Email: Ms. Tracie Donaldson at
donaldson.tracie@epa.gov.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Ms. Tracie
Donaldson, Air Permits Section (6PD–
R), Environmental Protection Agency,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42727-42730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17472]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2013-0542; FRL-9930-44-Region-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revisions to the New Source Review State Implementation Plan; Flexible
Permit Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is fully approving revisions to the Texas New Source
Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP) to establish the Texas
Minor NSR Flexible Permits Program (FPP), submitted by the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The approval was predicated
on the TCEQ meeting its commitment outlined in its letter dated
December 9, 2013, to adopt certain minor clarifications to the Flexible
Permit Program (FPP) by November 30, 2014. The TCEQ submitted the
revised program rules to meet its commitment on July 31, 2014. The EPA
is finalizing this action under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule will be effective August 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID
[[Page 42728]]
No. EPA-R06-OAR-2013-0542. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available. E.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the disclosure of which is restricted
by the statute. Certain other material such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Permits Section (6PD-R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733. While all documents in the docket are listed in the
index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly
available at either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Stephanie Kordzi, telephone 214-
665-7520; email address kordzi.stephanie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. When is this action effective?
IV. Final Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 14, 2014, the EPA took final rulemaking action
conditionally approving revisions to the Texas NSR SIP to establish the
Texas Minor NSR Flexible Permits Program, submitted by the TCEQ. The
EPA's proposed conditional approval was published in 79 FR 8368,
February 12, 2014. The conditional approval was predicated on a
commitment from TCEQ in a letter dated December 9, 2013, to adopt
certain minor clarifications to the FPP by November 30, 2014. (79 FR
40666, July 14, 2014).
On September 12, 2014, Environmental Integrity Project, et al.,
filed a Petition for Review challenging the EPA conditional approval of
the FPP with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The U.S. Department of
Justice submitted the response to the Petition, Case No. 14-60649, for
the EPA on March 2, 2015. The Appeal is on-going as of the date of
publication of this notice.
On July 31, 2014, the TCEQ submitted revisions to the Texas NSR
SIP. The rulemaking properly structured the rules within and according
to the rulemaking requirements of the Texas Administrative Procedure
Act and the Texas Administrative Code. The EPA proposed full approval
of the FPP (79 FR 7875, December 31, 2014) based on its determination
that the SIP revisions complied with section 110(k) of the Federal
Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA) and was consistent with the EPA's
regulations and policies. These revisions supported this action to
convert the approved conditional FPP to a fully approved FPP. The EPA
reopened the public notice period for an additional 30 days (80 FR
21199, April 17, 2015), due to items being inadvertently omitted from
the docket during the public notice period beginning December 31, 2014.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA proposed an initial comment period of 30 days. We received
comments from 3 organizations during the initial comment period as
follows: The TCEQ, Baker Botts, and the Environmental Integrity Project
(EIP) on behalf of the Environmental Justice Advocacy Services,
Community in Power & Development Association, Citizens for
Environmental Justice, Air Alliance Houston, Texas Campaign for the
Environment, and the Texas Impact. All comments previously submitted
under the first public notice for this action are being responded to as
appropriate and the commenters were informed that they did not need to
resubmit them during the reopened public notice period. The EPA did not
receive any additional comments during the reopened public notice
period. All comment letters can be found in their entirety in the
docket for this rulemaking.
Comment 1: Baker Botts stated they supported EPA's proposed
approval of the Texas FPP. They believe it complies with the federal
Clean Air Act. Further they believe that flexible permits are an
essential part of the Texas air quality permitting program and the
program has contributed to marked and sustained improvements in Texas
air quality. They submitted information from TCEQ's Web site which
documents reductions in ozone and other pollutants in Texas.
Response 1: The EPA appreciates the support for our final approval.
No changes were made to the final rule as a result of this comment.
Comment 2: The TCEQ concurs with the EPA's proposed determination
that the TCEQ fulfilled its December 9, 2013, commitment to submit the
FPP SIP revision. The TCEQ also concurs with EPA's proposed finding
that the TCEQ has satisfied all the elements of the EPA's final
conditional approval (79 FR 40666, July 14, 2014). The TCEQ submitted
on July 31, 2014, the following rules: 30 TAC Sections 116.13, 116.710,
116.711(1), (2)(A)(B) and (C)(i) and (ii), (D)-(J), and (L)-(N);
116.715(a)-(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B); 116.716; 116.717; 116.718;
116.721; and 116.765.
Response 2: The EPA appreciates the support for our final approval
of the rule. No changes were made to the final rule as a result of this
comment.
Comment 3: The EIP stated the following: ``this full approval
action is non-substantive, it is not the agency action we seek to, or
intend to, challenge.'' EIP did resubmit their April 4, 2014, comments
on the proposed conditional approval (Attachment A), and their January
27, 2015, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals brief (Attachment B).
Response 3: The EIP did not submit comments on the substance of
this action, which addressed the rules being properly structured within
and according to the rulemaking requirements of the Texas
Administrative Procedure Act and the Texas Administrative Code. The EPA
addressed the April 4, 2014, comments that the EIP resubmitted in its
response to comments contained in the final conditional approval. (79
FR 40666, July 14, 2014). Further, the Brief of Respondent U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Case No. 14-60649, filed on March 2,
2015, replies to the issues raised by EIP in its January 27, 2015,
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals brief. EPA is incorporating by reference
the EPA's Reply Brief in this response to the EIP's resubmitted
comments. It can be found in the Docket to this action.
III. When is this action effective?
The EPA has determined that today's final approval of the Texas FPP
is subject to the requirement to delay a rule's effective date until 30
days after publication in 5 U.S.C. 553(d) of the APA; therefore, the
rule, will become effective 30 days after publication.
IV. Final Action
After careful consideration of submitted revisions to meet the
requirements of the conditional approval and of the comments received
and the responses to each comment provided above, and under section 110
of the Act, the EPA is finalizing our proposal to convert the
conditional approval of the FPP to a full, final action. Further, we
have found it complies with section 110(l) of the Act.
[[Page 42729]]
We are making the following revisions to the Texas SIP:
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.13--Flexible Permit
Definitions.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.710--Applicability.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.711(1), (2)(A), (B) and
(C)(i) and (ii), (D)-(J), and (L)-(N)--Flexible Permit Application.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.715(a)-(e) and (f)(1) and
(2)(B)--General and Special Conditions.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.716--Emission Caps and
Individual Emission Limitations.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.717--Implementation
Schedule for Additional Controls.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.718--Significant Emission
Increase.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.720--Limitation of
Physical and Operational Changes.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.721--Amendments and
Alterations.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.740(a)--Public Notice.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.750--Flexible Permit Fee.
Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.765--Compliance Schedule.
The EPA has determined that the revised rule satisfies the December
9, 2013, Commitment Letter which was submitted in a timely manner.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, we are finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
revisions to the Texas regulations as described in the Final Action
section above. We have made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. See, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 18, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposed of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 30, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. In Sec. 52.2270(c), the table titled ``EPA Approved Regulations in
the Texas SIP'' is amended by revising the entries for sections 116.13,
116.710, 116,711, 116.715, 116.716, 116.717, 116.718, 116.720, 116.721,
116.740, 116.750, and 116.765 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 42730]]
EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval/
State citation Title/Subject Submittal EPA Approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 116 (Reg 6)--Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter A--Definitions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 116.13.............. Flexible Permit 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Definitions. Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter G--Flexible Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 116.710............. Applicability........ 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Federal Register
citation].
Section 116.711............. Flexible Permit 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert SIP includes 30 TAC
Application. Federal Register 116.711(1), (2)(A),
citation]. (B) and (C)(i) and
(ii), (D)-(J), and
(L)-(N)
* * * * * * *
Section 116.715............. General and Special 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert SIP includes 30 TAC
Conditions. Federal Register 116.715(a)-(e) and
citation]. (f)(1) and (2)(B)
Section 116.716............. Emission Caps and 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Individual Emission Federal Register
Limitations. citation].
Section 116.717............. Implementation 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Schedule for Federal Register
Additional Controls. citation].
Section 116.718............. Significant Emission 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Increase. Federal Register
citation].
Section 116.720............. Limitation on 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Physical and Federal Register
Operational Changes. citation].
Section 116.721............. Amendments and 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Alterations. Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
Section 116.740............. Public Notice and 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert SIP includes 30 TAC
Comment. Federal Register Section 116.740(a).
citation].
Section 116.750............. Flexible Permit Fee.. 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert ....................
Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
Section 116.765............. Compliance Schedule.. 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert SIP includes 30 TAC
Federal Register Section 116.765(b)
citation]. and (c).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-17472 Filed 7-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P