Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems, 42392-42393 [2015-17533]
Download as PDF
42392
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
are advised to avoid the regulated
navigation area. When inside the
regulated navigation area, all vessels
must proceed at no wake speed and
with due regard for all other persons
and/or vessels inside the regulated
navigation area.
(c) Dates. This rule will be enforced
from July 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015.
Dated: June 29, 2015.
R.T. Gromlich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–17615 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 501
Revisions to the Requirements for
Authority To Manufacture and
Distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service is revising
the rules concerning authorization to
manufacture and distribute postage
evidencing systems to reflect new
revenue assurance practices.
DATES: Effective: July 17, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Systems
Analyst, Payment Technology, U.S.
Postal Service, (202) 268–7613
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
23, 2015, the United States Postal
Service published a proposed rule to
amend 39 CFR part 501 to support the
automated revenue assurance program
currently in development. (See, 80 FR
22661). Comments were received from
two industry stakeholders. The first
comment generally supported the
proposed rule as written. The second
comment suggested that the proposed
rule should be clarified to apply only to
PC Postage systems, and not postage
meters. Further, it suggested that the
proposal inadequately addressed the
cost burden that would be imposed on
PC Postage providers, and should
provide additional detail regarding
account suspension processes,
adjustments for overpayment of postage,
and the role of the PC Postage provider
in the dispute resolution process.
The Postal Service believes that the
rule as proposed is appropriately
written to encompass all postage
evidencing systems. While initial
automated collection efforts will be
facilitated by PC Postage vendors, all
customers should pay postage
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
accurately, regardless of the postage
technology they elect to use. As
automated solutions become available
for the various postage evidencing
systems USPS will coordinate
implementation plans with the parties
concerned. Current manual efforts
employed by the Postal Service to
collect proper postage are costly and
inefficient. An automated approach will
reduce costs and improve overall
recovery efforts. The costs of program
administration will be acknowledged
and considered as the USPS establishes
operative recovery thresholds and
certain other program related business
rules. Account suspension, however, is
already specifically addressed in postal
regulations not modified by this
proposal (see, 39 CFR 501.6), and we see
no current need for further clarifications
in these regulations. We further believe
that the proposed rule as written (in
conjunction with current 39 CFR 501.11
and 501.12) appropriately discusses PC
Postage provider participation in the
dispute process. The Postal Service is
working diligently to ensure the quality
and accuracy of postage evidencing data
using automated process controls, and
may elect to make such adjustments to
our rules in the future as are required to
achieve that end. At this time, however,
we believe it is appropriate to publish
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated, 39
CFR part 501 is amended as follows:
PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO
MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE
POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 501 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector
General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95–
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
2. In § 501.1, revise paragraph (g) to
read as follows:
■
§ 501.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) A customer is a person or entity
authorized by the Postal Service to use
a Postage Evidencing System as an end
user in accordance with Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM),
including 604 Postage Payment Methods
and Refunds, 4.0 Postage Meters and PC
Postage Products (Postage Evidencing
Systems).
■ 3. In § 501.2, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 501.2 Postage Evidencing System
Provider authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Approval shall be based upon
satisfactory evidence of the applicant’s
integrity and financial responsibility,
commitment to comply with the Postal
Service’s revenue assurance practices as
outlined in section 501.16, and a
determination that disclosure to the
applicant of Postal Service customer,
financial, or other data of a commercial
nature necessary to perform the function
for which approval is sought would be
appropriate and consistent with good
business practices within the meaning
of 39 U.S.C. 410(c)(2). The Postal
Service may condition its approval
upon the applicant’s agreement to
undertakings that would give the Postal
Service appropriate assurance of the
applicant’s ability to meet its obligations
under this section, including but not
limited to the method and manner of
performing certain financial, security,
and servicing functions and the need to
maintain sufficient financial reserves to
guarantee uninterrupted performance of
not less than 3 months of operation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 501.16 add paragraph (i) to read
as follows:
§ 501.16 PC postage payment
methodology.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Revenue Assurance. To operate PC
Postage systems, the provider must
support business practices to assure
Postal Service revenue and accurate
payment from customers. Specifically,
the provider is required to notify the
customer and adjust the balance in the
postage evidencing system or otherwise
facilitate postage corrections to address
any postage discrepancies as directed by
the Postal Service, subject to the
applicable notification periods and
dispute mechanisms available to
customers for these corrections. The
Postal Service will supply the provider
with the necessary detail to justify the
correction and amount of the postage
correction to be used in the adjustment
process. The provider must supply
customers with visibility into the
identified postage correction, facilitate a
payment adjustment from the customer
in the amount equivalent to the
identified postage discrepancies to the
extent possible, and enable customers to
submit electronic disputes of such
postage discrepancies to the Postal
Service. Further if the Customer does
not have funds sufficient to cover the
amount of the discrepancies or the
postage discrepancies have not been
resolved, the provider may be required
to temporarily suspend or permanently
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
shut down the customer’s ability to
print PC Postage as described in the
Domestic Mail Manual section 604.4.
■ 5. In § 501.18, revise paragraph (b)(2)
and add paragraph (c)(6) to read as
follows:
§ 501.18 Customer information and
authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Within five years preceding
submission of the information, the
customer violated any standard for the
care or use of the Postage Evidencing
System, including any unresolved
identified postage discrepancies that
resulted in revocation of that customer’s
authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
(c)
*
*
*
*
*
(6) The customer has any unresolved
postage discrepancies.
*
*
*
*
*
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–17533 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0193; FRL–9930–41–
Region 5]
Approval of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Indiana; Lead Rule Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a request
submitted on March 14, 2013, and
supplemented on November 17, 2014,
by the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) to
revise the state implementation plan
(SIP) for lead. The submittal updates
Indiana’s lead rule at Title 326 of the
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC),
Article 15. It also amends 326 IAC
Article 20, to incorporate some of the
provisions of EPA’s National Emission
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for secondary lead smelters.
IDEM made the revisions to increase the
stringency and clarity of Indiana’s lead
SIP rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective September 15, 2015, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
August 17, 2015. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0193, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013–
0193. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42393
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This Facility is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Charles Hatten,
Environmental Engineer, (312) 886–
6031 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031,
hatten.charles@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background: Lead SIP and NESHAP Rules
II. Discussion of State Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background: Lead SIP and NESHAP
Indiana’s SIP rules for lead are
contained in two separate parts of the
State’s regulations. The first is Article
15, which EPA approved on August 17,
1989 (See 54 FR 33894). This provision
addresses lead-bearing emissions from
processes and fugitive dust from several
facilities in Indiana.
The second regulatory provision is
326 IAC 20–13, which EPA approved on
January 15, 2008 (77 FR 2248). This
section contains a partial incorporation
by reference of EPA’s June 13, 1997,
NESHAP for secondary lead smelting at
40 CFR part 63, subpart X (62 FR
32209). This includes: 1) 326 IAC 20–
13–1(c) [incorporation by reference of
40 CFR part 63, subpart X, NESHAP
(June 13, 1997; 62 FR 32209), with
exceptions]; 2) 326 IAC 20–13–2(a)
[source-specific lead emission limits
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42392-42393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17533]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 501
Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and
Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising the rules concerning
authorization to manufacture and distribute postage evidencing systems
to reflect new revenue assurance practices.
DATES: Effective: July 17, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Systems
Analyst, Payment Technology, U.S. Postal Service, (202) 268-7613
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 23, 2015, the United States Postal
Service published a proposed rule to amend 39 CFR part 501 to support
the automated revenue assurance program currently in development. (See,
80 FR 22661). Comments were received from two industry stakeholders.
The first comment generally supported the proposed rule as written. The
second comment suggested that the proposed rule should be clarified to
apply only to PC Postage systems, and not postage meters. Further, it
suggested that the proposal inadequately addressed the cost burden that
would be imposed on PC Postage providers, and should provide additional
detail regarding account suspension processes, adjustments for
overpayment of postage, and the role of the PC Postage provider in the
dispute resolution process.
The Postal Service believes that the rule as proposed is
appropriately written to encompass all postage evidencing systems.
While initial automated collection efforts will be facilitated by PC
Postage vendors, all customers should pay postage accurately,
regardless of the postage technology they elect to use. As automated
solutions become available for the various postage evidencing systems
USPS will coordinate implementation plans with the parties concerned.
Current manual efforts employed by the Postal Service to collect proper
postage are costly and inefficient. An automated approach will reduce
costs and improve overall recovery efforts. The costs of program
administration will be acknowledged and considered as the USPS
establishes operative recovery thresholds and certain other program
related business rules. Account suspension, however, is already
specifically addressed in postal regulations not modified by this
proposal (see, 39 CFR 501.6), and we see no current need for further
clarifications in these regulations. We further believe that the
proposed rule as written (in conjunction with current 39 CFR 501.11 and
501.12) appropriately discusses PC Postage provider participation in
the dispute process. The Postal Service is working diligently to ensure
the quality and accuracy of postage evidencing data using automated
process controls, and may elect to make such adjustments to our rules
in the future as are required to achieve that end. At this time,
however, we believe it is appropriate to publish this final rule.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated, 39 CFR part 501 is amended as
follows:
PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410,
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
0
2. In Sec. 501.1, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
(g) A customer is a person or entity authorized by the Postal
Service to use a Postage Evidencing System as an end user in accordance
with Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM), including 604 Postage Payment Methods and Refunds,
4.0 Postage Meters and PC Postage Products (Postage Evidencing
Systems).
0
3. In Sec. 501.2, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.2 Postage Evidencing System Provider authorization.
* * * * *
(d) Approval shall be based upon satisfactory evidence of the
applicant's integrity and financial responsibility, commitment to
comply with the Postal Service's revenue assurance practices as
outlined in section 501.16, and a determination that disclosure to the
applicant of Postal Service customer, financial, or other data of a
commercial nature necessary to perform the function for which approval
is sought would be appropriate and consistent with good business
practices within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 410(c)(2). The Postal Service
may condition its approval upon the applicant's agreement to
undertakings that would give the Postal Service appropriate assurance
of the applicant's ability to meet its obligations under this section,
including but not limited to the method and manner of performing
certain financial, security, and servicing functions and the need to
maintain sufficient financial reserves to guarantee uninterrupted
performance of not less than 3 months of operation.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 501.16 add paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.16 PC postage payment methodology.
* * * * *
(i) Revenue Assurance. To operate PC Postage systems, the provider
must support business practices to assure Postal Service revenue and
accurate payment from customers. Specifically, the provider is required
to notify the customer and adjust the balance in the postage evidencing
system or otherwise facilitate postage corrections to address any
postage discrepancies as directed by the Postal Service, subject to the
applicable notification periods and dispute mechanisms available to
customers for these corrections. The Postal Service will supply the
provider with the necessary detail to justify the correction and amount
of the postage correction to be used in the adjustment process. The
provider must supply customers with visibility into the identified
postage correction, facilitate a payment adjustment from the customer
in the amount equivalent to the identified postage discrepancies to the
extent possible, and enable customers to submit electronic disputes of
such postage discrepancies to the Postal Service. Further if the
Customer does not have funds sufficient to cover the amount of the
discrepancies or the postage discrepancies have not been resolved, the
provider may be required to temporarily suspend or permanently
[[Page 42393]]
shut down the customer's ability to print PC Postage as described in
the Domestic Mail Manual section 604.4.
0
5. In Sec. 501.18, revise paragraph (b)(2) and add paragraph (c)(6) to
read as follows:
Sec. 501.18 Customer information and authorization.
* * * * *
(b)
* * * * *
(2) Within five years preceding submission of the information, the
customer violated any standard for the care or use of the Postage
Evidencing System, including any unresolved identified postage
discrepancies that resulted in revocation of that customer's
authorization.
* * * * *
(c)
* * * * *
(6) The customer has any unresolved postage discrepancies.
* * * * *
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-17533 Filed 7-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P