Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems, 42392-42393 [2015-17533]

Download as PDF 42392 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations are advised to avoid the regulated navigation area. When inside the regulated navigation area, all vessels must proceed at no wake speed and with due regard for all other persons and/or vessels inside the regulated navigation area. (c) Dates. This rule will be enforced from July 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015. Dated: June 29, 2015. R.T. Gromlich, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2015–17615 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P POSTAL SERVICE 39 CFR Part 501 Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Postal Service is revising the rules concerning authorization to manufacture and distribute postage evidencing systems to reflect new revenue assurance practices. DATES: Effective: July 17, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Systems Analyst, Payment Technology, U.S. Postal Service, (202) 268–7613 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 23, 2015, the United States Postal Service published a proposed rule to amend 39 CFR part 501 to support the automated revenue assurance program currently in development. (See, 80 FR 22661). Comments were received from two industry stakeholders. The first comment generally supported the proposed rule as written. The second comment suggested that the proposed rule should be clarified to apply only to PC Postage systems, and not postage meters. Further, it suggested that the proposal inadequately addressed the cost burden that would be imposed on PC Postage providers, and should provide additional detail regarding account suspension processes, adjustments for overpayment of postage, and the role of the PC Postage provider in the dispute resolution process. The Postal Service believes that the rule as proposed is appropriately written to encompass all postage evidencing systems. While initial automated collection efforts will be facilitated by PC Postage vendors, all customers should pay postage asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jul 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 accurately, regardless of the postage technology they elect to use. As automated solutions become available for the various postage evidencing systems USPS will coordinate implementation plans with the parties concerned. Current manual efforts employed by the Postal Service to collect proper postage are costly and inefficient. An automated approach will reduce costs and improve overall recovery efforts. The costs of program administration will be acknowledged and considered as the USPS establishes operative recovery thresholds and certain other program related business rules. Account suspension, however, is already specifically addressed in postal regulations not modified by this proposal (see, 39 CFR 501.6), and we see no current need for further clarifications in these regulations. We further believe that the proposed rule as written (in conjunction with current 39 CFR 501.11 and 501.12) appropriately discusses PC Postage provider participation in the dispute process. The Postal Service is working diligently to ensure the quality and accuracy of postage evidencing data using automated process controls, and may elect to make such adjustments to our rules in the future as are required to achieve that end. At this time, however, we believe it is appropriate to publish this final rule. List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501 Administrative practice and procedure. Accordingly, for the reasons stated, 39 CFR part 501 is amended as follows: PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS 1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95– 452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3. 2. In § 501.1, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows: ■ § 501.1 Definitions. * * * * * (g) A customer is a person or entity authorized by the Postal Service to use a Postage Evidencing System as an end user in accordance with Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), including 604 Postage Payment Methods and Refunds, 4.0 Postage Meters and PC Postage Products (Postage Evidencing Systems). ■ 3. In § 501.2, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 § 501.2 Postage Evidencing System Provider authorization. * * * * * (d) Approval shall be based upon satisfactory evidence of the applicant’s integrity and financial responsibility, commitment to comply with the Postal Service’s revenue assurance practices as outlined in section 501.16, and a determination that disclosure to the applicant of Postal Service customer, financial, or other data of a commercial nature necessary to perform the function for which approval is sought would be appropriate and consistent with good business practices within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 410(c)(2). The Postal Service may condition its approval upon the applicant’s agreement to undertakings that would give the Postal Service appropriate assurance of the applicant’s ability to meet its obligations under this section, including but not limited to the method and manner of performing certain financial, security, and servicing functions and the need to maintain sufficient financial reserves to guarantee uninterrupted performance of not less than 3 months of operation. * * * * * ■ 4. In § 501.16 add paragraph (i) to read as follows: § 501.16 PC postage payment methodology. * * * * * (i) Revenue Assurance. To operate PC Postage systems, the provider must support business practices to assure Postal Service revenue and accurate payment from customers. Specifically, the provider is required to notify the customer and adjust the balance in the postage evidencing system or otherwise facilitate postage corrections to address any postage discrepancies as directed by the Postal Service, subject to the applicable notification periods and dispute mechanisms available to customers for these corrections. The Postal Service will supply the provider with the necessary detail to justify the correction and amount of the postage correction to be used in the adjustment process. The provider must supply customers with visibility into the identified postage correction, facilitate a payment adjustment from the customer in the amount equivalent to the identified postage discrepancies to the extent possible, and enable customers to submit electronic disputes of such postage discrepancies to the Postal Service. Further if the Customer does not have funds sufficient to cover the amount of the discrepancies or the postage discrepancies have not been resolved, the provider may be required to temporarily suspend or permanently E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM 17JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations shut down the customer’s ability to print PC Postage as described in the Domestic Mail Manual section 604.4. ■ 5. In § 501.18, revise paragraph (b)(2) and add paragraph (c)(6) to read as follows: § 501.18 Customer information and authorization. * * * * * (b) * * * * * (2) Within five years preceding submission of the information, the customer violated any standard for the care or use of the Postage Evidencing System, including any unresolved identified postage discrepancies that resulted in revocation of that customer’s authorization. * * * * * (c) * * * * * (6) The customer has any unresolved postage discrepancies. * * * * * Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Federal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–17533 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0193; FRL–9930–41– Region 5] Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Lead Rule Revisions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a request submitted on March 14, 2013, and supplemented on November 17, 2014, by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) to revise the state implementation plan (SIP) for lead. The submittal updates Indiana’s lead rule at Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Article 15. It also amends 326 IAC Article 20, to incorporate some of the provisions of EPA’s National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for secondary lead smelters. IDEM made the revisions to increase the stringency and clarity of Indiana’s lead SIP rules. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 15, 2015, unless EPA receives adverse comments by asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jul 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 August 17, 2015. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2013–0193, by one of the following methods: 1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013– 0193. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 42393 able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, (312) 886– 6031 before visiting the Region 5 office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, hatten.charles@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. Background: Lead SIP and NESHAP Rules II. Discussion of State Submittal III. What action is EPA taking? IV. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background: Lead SIP and NESHAP Indiana’s SIP rules for lead are contained in two separate parts of the State’s regulations. The first is Article 15, which EPA approved on August 17, 1989 (See 54 FR 33894). This provision addresses lead-bearing emissions from processes and fugitive dust from several facilities in Indiana. The second regulatory provision is 326 IAC 20–13, which EPA approved on January 15, 2008 (77 FR 2248). This section contains a partial incorporation by reference of EPA’s June 13, 1997, NESHAP for secondary lead smelting at 40 CFR part 63, subpart X (62 FR 32209). This includes: 1) 326 IAC 20– 13–1(c) [incorporation by reference of 40 CFR part 63, subpart X, NESHAP (June 13, 1997; 62 FR 32209), with exceptions]; 2) 326 IAC 20–13–2(a) [source-specific lead emission limits E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM 17JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42392-42393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17533]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 501


Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and 
Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising the rules concerning 
authorization to manufacture and distribute postage evidencing systems 
to reflect new revenue assurance practices.

DATES: Effective: July 17, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Systems 
Analyst, Payment Technology, U.S. Postal Service, (202) 268-7613

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 23, 2015, the United States Postal 
Service published a proposed rule to amend 39 CFR part 501 to support 
the automated revenue assurance program currently in development. (See, 
80 FR 22661). Comments were received from two industry stakeholders. 
The first comment generally supported the proposed rule as written. The 
second comment suggested that the proposed rule should be clarified to 
apply only to PC Postage systems, and not postage meters. Further, it 
suggested that the proposal inadequately addressed the cost burden that 
would be imposed on PC Postage providers, and should provide additional 
detail regarding account suspension processes, adjustments for 
overpayment of postage, and the role of the PC Postage provider in the 
dispute resolution process.
    The Postal Service believes that the rule as proposed is 
appropriately written to encompass all postage evidencing systems. 
While initial automated collection efforts will be facilitated by PC 
Postage vendors, all customers should pay postage accurately, 
regardless of the postage technology they elect to use. As automated 
solutions become available for the various postage evidencing systems 
USPS will coordinate implementation plans with the parties concerned. 
Current manual efforts employed by the Postal Service to collect proper 
postage are costly and inefficient. An automated approach will reduce 
costs and improve overall recovery efforts. The costs of program 
administration will be acknowledged and considered as the USPS 
establishes operative recovery thresholds and certain other program 
related business rules. Account suspension, however, is already 
specifically addressed in postal regulations not modified by this 
proposal (see, 39 CFR 501.6), and we see no current need for further 
clarifications in these regulations. We further believe that the 
proposed rule as written (in conjunction with current 39 CFR 501.11 and 
501.12) appropriately discusses PC Postage provider participation in 
the dispute process. The Postal Service is working diligently to ensure 
the quality and accuracy of postage evidencing data using automated 
process controls, and may elect to make such adjustments to our rules 
in the future as are required to achieve that end. At this time, 
however, we believe it is appropriate to publish this final rule.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501

    Administrative practice and procedure.
    Accordingly, for the reasons stated, 39 CFR part 501 is amended as 
follows:

PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE 
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS

0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.


0
2. In Sec.  501.1, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.1  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (g) A customer is a person or entity authorized by the Postal 
Service to use a Postage Evidencing System as an end user in accordance 
with Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic 
Mail Manual (DMM), including 604 Postage Payment Methods and Refunds, 
4.0 Postage Meters and PC Postage Products (Postage Evidencing 
Systems).

0
3. In Sec.  501.2, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.2  Postage Evidencing System Provider authorization.

* * * * *
    (d) Approval shall be based upon satisfactory evidence of the 
applicant's integrity and financial responsibility, commitment to 
comply with the Postal Service's revenue assurance practices as 
outlined in section 501.16, and a determination that disclosure to the 
applicant of Postal Service customer, financial, or other data of a 
commercial nature necessary to perform the function for which approval 
is sought would be appropriate and consistent with good business 
practices within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 410(c)(2). The Postal Service 
may condition its approval upon the applicant's agreement to 
undertakings that would give the Postal Service appropriate assurance 
of the applicant's ability to meet its obligations under this section, 
including but not limited to the method and manner of performing 
certain financial, security, and servicing functions and the need to 
maintain sufficient financial reserves to guarantee uninterrupted 
performance of not less than 3 months of operation.
* * * * *

0
4. In Sec.  501.16 add paragraph (i) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.16  PC postage payment methodology.

* * * * *
    (i) Revenue Assurance. To operate PC Postage systems, the provider 
must support business practices to assure Postal Service revenue and 
accurate payment from customers. Specifically, the provider is required 
to notify the customer and adjust the balance in the postage evidencing 
system or otherwise facilitate postage corrections to address any 
postage discrepancies as directed by the Postal Service, subject to the 
applicable notification periods and dispute mechanisms available to 
customers for these corrections. The Postal Service will supply the 
provider with the necessary detail to justify the correction and amount 
of the postage correction to be used in the adjustment process. The 
provider must supply customers with visibility into the identified 
postage correction, facilitate a payment adjustment from the customer 
in the amount equivalent to the identified postage discrepancies to the 
extent possible, and enable customers to submit electronic disputes of 
such postage discrepancies to the Postal Service. Further if the 
Customer does not have funds sufficient to cover the amount of the 
discrepancies or the postage discrepancies have not been resolved, the 
provider may be required to temporarily suspend or permanently

[[Page 42393]]

shut down the customer's ability to print PC Postage as described in 
the Domestic Mail Manual section 604.4.

0
5. In Sec.  501.18, revise paragraph (b)(2) and add paragraph (c)(6) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  501.18  Customer information and authorization.

* * * * *
    (b)
* * * * *
    (2) Within five years preceding submission of the information, the 
customer violated any standard for the care or use of the Postage 
Evidencing System, including any unresolved identified postage 
discrepancies that resulted in revocation of that customer's 
authorization.
* * * * *
    (c)
* * * * *
    (6) The customer has any unresolved postage discrepancies.
* * * * *

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-17533 Filed 7-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.