Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit Application; Proposed Diversified Pacific Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan and Associated Documents, City of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California, 41052-41053 [2015-17209]
Download as PDF
41052
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2014–N141; FXES11120000–
156–FF08ECAR00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Incidental Take Permit
Application; Proposed Diversified
Pacific Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan and Associated
Documents, City of Redlands, San
Bernardino County, California
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
an application from Diversified Pacific
(Applicant), for a 5-year incidental take
permit (permit). The application
includes the Applicant’s proposed
habitat conservation plan (HCP), as
required by the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act). If approved,
the permit would authorize incidental
take of the endangered San Bernardino
Merriam’s kangaroo rat in the course of
routine construction activities
associated with the development of
residential houses in the City of
Redlands. We invite public comment on
the permit application and the proposed
HCP, and on our preliminary
determination that the HCP qualifies as
‘‘low-effect’’ for a categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act. To make this determination,
we used our environmental action
statement and low-effect screening form,
which are also available for review.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by August
13, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
request a copy of the incidental take
permit application, draft EA, and
proposed HCP by email, telephone, fax,
or U.S. mail (see below). These
documents are also available for public
inspection by appointment during
normal business hours at the office
below. Please send your requests or
comments by any one of the following
methods, and specify ‘‘Diversified
Pacific Low-Effect HCP’’ in your request
or comment.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit comments or requests for more
information by any of the following
methods:
Email: karin_cleary-rose@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Diversified Pacific Low-Effect
HCP’’ in the subject line of your
message.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Jul 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
Telephone: Karin Cleary-Rose, Palm
Springs Fish and Wildlife Office, 760–
322–2070 extension 206.
Fax: Karin Cleary-Rose, Palm Springs
Fish and Wildlife Office, 760–322–4648,
Attn.: Diversified Pacific Low-Effect
HCP.
U.S. Mail: Karin Cleary-Rose, Palm
Springs Fish and Wildlife Office, Attn.:
Diversified Pacific Low-Effect HCP, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 777 East
Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208, Palm
Springs, CA 92262.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup of
Documents, or Delivery of Comments:
Call 760–322–2070 to make an
appointment during regular business
hours at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karin Cleary-Rose, Inland Division
Chief, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife
Office; telephone 760–332–2070
extension 206. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Applicant, Diversified Pacific,
requests an incidental take permit under
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. If we
approve the permit, the Applicant
anticipates taking San Bernardino
Merriam’s kangaroo rat (Dipodomys
merriami parvus; SBKR) as a result of
permanent impacts to habitat that the
species uses for breeding, feeding, and
sheltering. Take of SBKR would be
incidental to the Applicant’s activities
associated with the construction of
residential houses in the City of
Redlands, San Bernardino County,
California. We published a final rule to
list SBKR as endangered on September
24, 1998 (63 FR 51005). The rule
became effective September 24, 1998.
Final designation of Critical Habitat was
published on April 23, 2002 (67 FR
19812). A 5-year review of the species
was published on May 21, 2010 (75 FR
28636).
Background
Section 9 of the Act and our
implementing Federal regulations in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR part 17 prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of
wildlife species listed as endangered or
threatened. Take of listed wildlife is
defined under the Act as ‘‘to harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture, or collect listed species, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 1538). ‘‘Harm’’
includes significant habitat modification
or degradation that actually kills or
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
injures listed wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns
such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering
(50 CFR 17.3). Under limited
circumstances, we may issue permits to
authorize incidental take of listed
wildlife species, which the Act defines
as take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, the carrying out of otherwise
lawful activities.
Regulations governing incidental take
permits for threatened and endangered
species are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22,
respectively. In addition to meeting
other criteria, activities covered by an
incidental take permit must not
jeopardize the continued existence in
the wild of federally listed wildlife or
plants.
Applicant’s Proposal
The Applicant requests a 5-year
permit under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Act. If we approve the permit, the
Applicant anticipates taking SBKR as a
result of the construction activities
which will permanently impact 7.7
acres (ac) (3.12 hectares (ha)) of habitat
the species uses for breeding, feeding,
and sheltering. The take would be
incidental to the Applicant’s routine
construction activities associated with
the development of residential houses.
The site is located southwest and
southeast of the intersection of Pioneer
Avenue and Judson Street in the City of
Redlands, San Bernardino County,
California. The proposed project site is
surrounded by residential development
and a mix of active and abandoned
citrus orchards. An active municipal
airport is located approximately 0.25
mile northeast of the project site.
Based upon focused surveys (2003,
2010, 2013, and 2015), 7.7 ac (3.12 ha)
of the project site are occupied by
SBKR. The Service has determined that
the proposed development would result
in incidental take of SBKR. No other
federally listed species are known to
occupy the project site.
To mitigate take of SBKR at the
project site, the Applicant proposes one
of two mitigation options.
Option A:
D SBKR captured prior to ground
disturbance on the project site will be
translocated to Cajon Creek
Conservation Bank in the City of
Muscoy, San Bernardino County,
California. These animals will augment
the current low-density population of
SBKR found in the portion of the Bank
where the relocation will occur. These
animals will be monitored for 5 years,
including annual reporting.
D The Applicant will provide funding
for the perpetual maintenance and
monitoring of approximately 20.9 ac of
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan
Alternatives
In the proposed HCP, the Applicant
considers alternatives to the taking
SBKR under the proposed action. Our
proposed action is to issue an incidental
take permit to the Applicant, who
would implement the HCP. If we
approve the permit, take of SBKR would
be authorized for the Applicant’s
routine construction activities
associated with the development of
residential houses, in the City of
Redlands. The Applicant’s proposed
HCP does identify a no-build alternative
that would not result in incidental take
of SBKR, but it is infeasible for the
Applicant to accept this alternative as it
would result in no development of the
land or associated infrastructure
improvements necessary to the City of
Redlands and surrounding community.
The proposed HCP also examined
participation in a regional HCP as an
alternative to an individual HCP. This
alternative plan is infeasible because
there is currently no completed regional
plan, and the timing for completion of
a regional plan is unknown.
We base our determination that a HCP
qualifies as a low-effect plan on the
following three criteria:
(1) Implementation of the HCP would
result in minor or negligible effects on
federally listed, proposed, and
candidate species and their habitats;
(2) Implementation of the HCP would
result in minor or negligible effects on
other environmental values or
resources; and
(3) Impacts of the HCP, considered
together with the impacts of other past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable
similarly situated projects, would not
result, over time, in cumulative effects
to environmental values or resources
that would be considered significant.
As more fully explained in our
environmental action statement and
associated low-effect screening form, the
Applicant’s proposed HCP qualifies as a
low-effect HCP for the following
reasons:
• The project is small in size and
does not jeopardize the continued
existence of the SBKR.
• The Applicant will mitigate impacts
to the SBKR by translocating HCP
individuals to a conserved property,
monitoring those translocated
individuals for 5 years, and funding the
perpetual management of up to 23.1
acres of high-quality SBKR habitat at the
conserved 100-acre Redlands
Conservancy property in Redlands,
California.
• This project proposes to increase
the genetic diversity of SBKR at the
translocation receiver site, fund the
long-term management of conserved and
occupied habitat, and increase the
quality of habitat, in areas found outside
of the 100-year floodplain, in two of the
three designated critical habitat units for
the species.
Therefore, our proposed issuance of
the requested incidental take permit
qualifies as a categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act, as provided by the
Department of the Interior Manual (516
DM 2 Appendix 1, 516 DM 6 Appendix
1, and 516 DM 8.5(C)(2)). Based on our
review of public comments we receive
in response to this notice, we may revise
this preliminary determination.
Our Preliminary Determination
We invite comments on our
preliminary determination that our
proposed action, based on the
Applicant’s proposed activities,
including the proposed minimization
and mitigation measures, would have a
minor or negligible effect on SBKR, and
that the HCP qualifies as ‘‘low effect’’ as
defined by our Habitat Conservation
Planning Handbook (November 1996).
Public Review
The Service invites the public to
comment on the permit application,
including the proposed HCP, during the
public comment period. Copies of the
documents will be available during a
30-day public comment period (see
DATES). If you wish to comment, you
may submit your comments to the
address listed in ADDRESSES. Before
including your address, phone number,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
occupied high-quality SBKR habitat in
the City of Redlands, owned and
conserved by the Redlands Land
Conservancy into perpetuity.
Option B:
D SBKR captured prior to ground
disturbance on the project site will be
relocated to conserved habitat owned
and managed by the Redlands Land
Conservancy or other conserved
property managed for the benefit of
SBKR.
D The Applicant will provide funding
for the perpetual maintenance and
monitoring of 23.1 ac of occupied highquality SBKR habitat in the City of
Redlands, owned and conserved by the
Redlands Land Conservancy for the
benefit SBKR in perpetuity.
The determination as to which
mitigation option will be implemented
will be based upon the suitability of
conserved site to receive the
translocated population. This decision
will be made by the Service prior to the
initiation of ground disturbance on the
project site.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Jul 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41053
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the proposed HCP
and comments we receive to determine
whether the permit application meets
the requirements and issuance criteria
under section 10(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). We will also evaluate
whether issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B)
incidental take permit would comply
with section 7 of the Act by conducting
an intra-Service consultation. We will
use the results of this consultation, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
or not to issue a permit. If the
requirements and issuance criteria
under section 10(a) are met, we will
issue the permit to the Applicant for
incidental take of SBKR.
G. Mendel Stewart,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, Carlsbad, California.
[FR Doc. 2015–17209 Filed 7–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Geological Survey
[GX15AE6000C1000]
Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive
License
Geological Survey, Department
of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to grant an
exclusive license.
AGENCY:
The Notice is hereby given
that the U.S. Geological Survey intends
to grant to Glosten Associates, 1201
Western Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA
98101, an exclusive license to practice
the following: A system, method, and
apparatus for treating ship ballast water.
DATES: Comments must be received
fifteen (15) days from the effective date
of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Henry, Technology Enterprise
Specialist, Office of Policy & Analysis,
U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise
Valley Dr., MS 153, Reston, VA 20192,
703–648–4344.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41052-41053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17209]
[[Page 41052]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2014-N141; FXES11120000-156-FF08ECAR00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take
Permit Application; Proposed Diversified Pacific Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan and Associated Documents, City of Redlands, San
Bernardino County, California
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application from Diversified Pacific (Applicant), for a 5-
year incidental take permit (permit). The application includes the
Applicant's proposed habitat conservation plan (HCP), as required by
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). If approved, the
permit would authorize incidental take of the endangered San Bernardino
Merriam's kangaroo rat in the course of routine construction activities
associated with the development of residential houses in the City of
Redlands. We invite public comment on the permit application and the
proposed HCP, and on our preliminary determination that the HCP
qualifies as ``low-effect'' for a categorical exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act. To make this determination, we used
our environmental action statement and low-effect screening form, which
are also available for review.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
August 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may request a copy of the incidental take
permit application, draft EA, and proposed HCP by email, telephone,
fax, or U.S. mail (see below). These documents are also available for
public inspection by appointment during normal business hours at the
office below. Please send your requests or comments by any one of the
following methods, and specify ``Diversified Pacific Low-Effect HCP''
in your request or comment.
Submitting Comments: You may submit comments or requests for more
information by any of the following methods:
Email: karin_cleary-rose@fws.gov. Include ``Diversified Pacific
Low-Effect HCP'' in the subject line of your message.
Telephone: Karin Cleary-Rose, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife
Office, 760-322-2070 extension 206.
Fax: Karin Cleary-Rose, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office, 760-
322-4648, Attn.: Diversified Pacific Low-Effect HCP.
U.S. Mail: Karin Cleary-Rose, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife
Office, Attn.: Diversified Pacific Low-Effect HCP, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208, Palm
Springs, CA 92262.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup of Documents, or Delivery of Comments:
Call 760-322-2070 to make an appointment during regular business hours
at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karin Cleary-Rose, Inland Division
Chief, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office; telephone 760-332-2070
extension 206. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-
877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Applicant, Diversified Pacific, requests an incidental take
permit under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. If we approve the permit,
the Applicant anticipates taking San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat
(Dipodomys merriami parvus; SBKR) as a result of permanent impacts to
habitat that the species uses for breeding, feeding, and sheltering.
Take of SBKR would be incidental to the Applicant's activities
associated with the construction of residential houses in the City of
Redlands, San Bernardino County, California. We published a final rule
to list SBKR as endangered on September 24, 1998 (63 FR 51005). The
rule became effective September 24, 1998. Final designation of Critical
Habitat was published on April 23, 2002 (67 FR 19812). A 5-year review
of the species was published on May 21, 2010 (75 FR 28636).
Background
Section 9 of the Act and our implementing Federal regulations in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR part 17 prohibit the
``take'' of wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened. Take
of listed wildlife is defined under the Act as ``to harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect listed
species, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct'' (16 U.S.C.
1538). ``Harm'' includes significant habitat modification or
degradation that actually kills or injures listed wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns such as breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). Under limited circumstances, we
may issue permits to authorize incidental take of listed wildlife
species, which the Act defines as take that is incidental to, and not
the purpose of, the carrying out of otherwise lawful activities.
Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and
endangered species are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively. In
addition to meeting other criteria, activities covered by an incidental
take permit must not jeopardize the continued existence in the wild of
federally listed wildlife or plants.
Applicant's Proposal
The Applicant requests a 5-year permit under section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act. If we approve the permit, the Applicant anticipates taking
SBKR as a result of the construction activities which will permanently
impact 7.7 acres (ac) (3.12 hectares (ha)) of habitat the species uses
for breeding, feeding, and sheltering. The take would be incidental to
the Applicant's routine construction activities associated with the
development of residential houses. The site is located southwest and
southeast of the intersection of Pioneer Avenue and Judson Street in
the City of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California. The proposed
project site is surrounded by residential development and a mix of
active and abandoned citrus orchards. An active municipal airport is
located approximately 0.25 mile northeast of the project site.
Based upon focused surveys (2003, 2010, 2013, and 2015), 7.7 ac
(3.12 ha) of the project site are occupied by SBKR. The Service has
determined that the proposed development would result in incidental
take of SBKR. No other federally listed species are known to occupy the
project site.
To mitigate take of SBKR at the project site, the Applicant
proposes one of two mitigation options.
Option A:
[ssquf] SBKR captured prior to ground disturbance on the project
site will be translocated to Cajon Creek Conservation Bank in the City
of Muscoy, San Bernardino County, California. These animals will
augment the current low-density population of SBKR found in the portion
of the Bank where the relocation will occur. These animals will be
monitored for 5 years, including annual reporting.
[ssquf] The Applicant will provide funding for the perpetual
maintenance and monitoring of approximately 20.9 ac of
[[Page 41053]]
occupied high-quality SBKR habitat in the City of Redlands, owned and
conserved by the Redlands Land Conservancy into perpetuity.
Option B:
[ssquf] SBKR captured prior to ground disturbance on the project
site will be relocated to conserved habitat owned and managed by the
Redlands Land Conservancy or other conserved property managed for the
benefit of SBKR.
[ssquf] The Applicant will provide funding for the perpetual
maintenance and monitoring of 23.1 ac of occupied high-quality SBKR
habitat in the City of Redlands, owned and conserved by the Redlands
Land Conservancy for the benefit SBKR in perpetuity.
The determination as to which mitigation option will be implemented
will be based upon the suitability of conserved site to receive the
translocated population. This decision will be made by the Service
prior to the initiation of ground disturbance on the project site.
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan Alternatives
In the proposed HCP, the Applicant considers alternatives to the
taking SBKR under the proposed action. Our proposed action is to issue
an incidental take permit to the Applicant, who would implement the
HCP. If we approve the permit, take of SBKR would be authorized for the
Applicant's routine construction activities associated with the
development of residential houses, in the City of Redlands. The
Applicant's proposed HCP does identify a no-build alternative that
would not result in incidental take of SBKR, but it is infeasible for
the Applicant to accept this alternative as it would result in no
development of the land or associated infrastructure improvements
necessary to the City of Redlands and surrounding community. The
proposed HCP also examined participation in a regional HCP as an
alternative to an individual HCP. This alternative plan is infeasible
because there is currently no completed regional plan, and the timing
for completion of a regional plan is unknown.
Our Preliminary Determination
We invite comments on our preliminary determination that our
proposed action, based on the Applicant's proposed activities,
including the proposed minimization and mitigation measures, would have
a minor or negligible effect on SBKR, and that the HCP qualifies as
``low effect'' as defined by our Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook
(November 1996).
We base our determination that a HCP qualifies as a low-effect plan
on the following three criteria:
(1) Implementation of the HCP would result in minor or negligible
effects on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and their
habitats;
(2) Implementation of the HCP would result in minor or negligible
effects on other environmental values or resources; and
(3) Impacts of the HCP, considered together with the impacts of
other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated
projects, would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to
environmental values or resources that would be considered significant.
As more fully explained in our environmental action statement and
associated low-effect screening form, the Applicant's proposed HCP
qualifies as a low-effect HCP for the following reasons:
The project is small in size and does not jeopardize the
continued existence of the SBKR.
The Applicant will mitigate impacts to the SBKR by
translocating HCP individuals to a conserved property, monitoring those
translocated individuals for 5 years, and funding the perpetual
management of up to 23.1 acres of high-quality SBKR habitat at the
conserved 100-acre Redlands Conservancy property in Redlands,
California.
This project proposes to increase the genetic diversity of
SBKR at the translocation receiver site, fund the long-term management
of conserved and occupied habitat, and increase the quality of habitat,
in areas found outside of the 100-year floodplain, in two of the three
designated critical habitat units for the species.
Therefore, our proposed issuance of the requested incidental take
permit qualifies as a categorical exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act, as provided by the Department of the Interior
Manual (516 DM 2 Appendix 1, 516 DM 6 Appendix 1, and 516 DM
8.5(C)(2)). Based on our review of public comments we receive in
response to this notice, we may revise this preliminary determination.
Public Review
The Service invites the public to comment on the permit
application, including the proposed HCP, during the public comment
period. Copies of the documents will be available during a 30-day
public comment period (see DATES). If you wish to comment, you may
submit your comments to the address listed in ADDRESSES. Before
including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the proposed HCP and comments we receive to
determine whether the permit application meets the requirements and
issuance criteria under section 10(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). We will also evaluate whether issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B)
incidental take permit would comply with section 7 of the Act by
conducting an intra-Service consultation. We will use the results of
this consultation, in combination with the above findings, in our final
analysis to determine whether or not to issue a permit. If the
requirements and issuance criteria under section 10(a) are met, we will
issue the permit to the Applicant for incidental take of SBKR.
G. Mendel Stewart,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad,
California.
[FR Doc. 2015-17209 Filed 7-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P