The Release of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Figure Eight Island Shoreline Management Project, on Figure Eight Island, New Hanover County, NC, 39761-39762 [2015-16941]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 132 / Friday, July 10, 2015 / Notices
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, Regulatory and Audit
Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–9010.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Office of Family
Readiness Policy, ATTN: Program
Manager, Spouse Education & Career
Opportunities Program, 4800 Mark
Center Drive, Suite 03G15, Alexandria,
VA 22350–2300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Military Spouse Employment
Partnership (MSEP) Career Portal; OMB
Control Number 0704–TBD.
Needs and Uses: This information
collection requirement is necessary to
allow MSEP Partners to search for
military spouse candidates and for
military spouses to directly search for
employment opportunities with MSEP
Partners.
Affected Public: Military spouse users
of the MSEP Career Portal, MSEP
Partners, Companies.
Annual Burden Hours:
Military Spouses = 16,500.
MSEP Partners = 125.
Companies = 38.
TOTAL = 900,163.
Number of Respondents:
Military Spouses = 22,000 military
spouses.
MSEP Partners = 300 partners.
Companies = 150 companies.
TOTAL = 1,200,450 respondents.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Average Burden per Response:
Military Spouses = 45 minutes.
MSEP Partners = 25 minutes.
Companies = 15 minutes.
TOTAL = 85 minutes.
Frequency:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:51 Jul 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Military Spouses = On occasion.
MSEP Partners = On occasion.
Companies = Once.
The Military Spouse Employment
Partnership (MSEP) Career Portal is the
sole web platform utilized to connect
military spouses with companies
seeking to hire military spouse
employees. Participating companies,
called MSEP Partners, are vetted and
approved participants in the MSEP
Program and have pledged to recruit,
hire, promote and retain military
spouses in portable careers. MSEP is a
targeted recruitment and employment
partnership that connects American
businesses with military spouses who
possess essential 21st-century workforce
skills and attributes and are seeking
portable, fulfilling careers. The MSEP
program is part of the overall Spouse
Education and Career Opportunities
(SECO) program which falls under the
auspices of the office of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Military Community & Family Policy.
This program was developed in
compliance with 10 U.S. Code 1784
Employment Opportunities for Military
Spouses which states:
(f) Private-Sector Employment.—The
Secretary of Defense—
(1) Shall seek to develop partnerships
with firms in the private sector to
enhance employment opportunities for
spouses of members of the armed forces
and to provide for improved job
portability for such spouses, especially
in the case of the spouse of a member
of the armed forces accompanying the
member to a new geographical area
because of a change of permanent duty
station of the member; and
(2) shall work with the United States
Chamber of Commerce and other
appropriate private-sector entities to
facilitate the formation of such
partnerships.
Dated: July 7, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–16869 Filed 7–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
The Release of the Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Figure Eight Island Shoreline
Management Project, on Figure Eight
Island, New Hanover County, NC
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
39761
Notice of Availability.
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE), Wilmington District,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office has
received a request for Department of the
Army authorization, pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and Section
10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, from
Figure Eight Beach Homeowners’
Association Inc. (HOA) to install a
terminal groin structure along Rich Inlet
and to conduct a supplemental beach
nourishment on approximately 4,500
linear feet of oceanfront beach and 1,400
linear feet of back barrier shoreline to
protect residential homes and
infrastructures along the central and
northern sections of Figure Eight Island.
The terminal groin structure will be
placed perpendicular on the northern
tip of the island along the shoulder of
Rich Inlet; and the proposed source of
the material for the nourishment will be
dredged from an area within Nixon
Channel, a back barrier channel, that
has been previously used for past beach
nourishment projects. In case the
quantity of material from Nixon
Channel is not sufficient, material
pumped from (3) nearby upland
disposal islands will be used to
supplement the nourishment needs. The
majority of the material will be disposed
within the fillet area, or down shore, of
the groin. Pending storm events and
shoreline changes, maintenance, or
periodic nourishment, of the beach is
proposed a maximum of once every five
years, or potential 6 separate events over
the 30-year study period. Nixon
Channel and the upland disposal
islands are the proposed material
sources for the periodic maintenance, or
renourishment, events.
DATES: Written comments on the
Supplemental EIS must be received at
(see ADDRESSES) no later than 5 p.m. on
August 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and
questions regarding the Supplemental
EIS may be addressed to: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District,
Regulatory Division. ATTN: File
Number 2006–41158, 69 Darlington
Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403. Copies
of the Supplemental EIS can be
reviewed on the Corps homepage at,
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/
Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/
MajorProjects, under Figure Eight Island
Terminal Groin: Corps ID #SAW–2006–
41158.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and SEIS and/or to receive CD or
written copies of the Supplemental EIS
can be directed to Mr. Mickey Sugg,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39762
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 132 / Friday, July 10, 2015 / Notices
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office,
telephone: (910) 251–4811.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Project Purpose and Need. Figure
Eight Beach HOA has addressed the
continuing oceanfront erosion problems
associated with Rich Inlet and Nixon
Channel erosion hot-spot on the
estuarine side of the island over the past
several decades. Past actions to protect
the shorelines have provided some
protection, however they are seeking a
longer term solution to handle shoreline
erosion in order to protect the island’s
$907,352,900 (based on the 2012
reappraisal) assessed property tax value.
Their stated needs of the project
continue to be the following: (1) Reduce
erosion along approximately 2.3 miles
of oceanfront and 0.34 miles of back
barrier shorelines, (2) Provide
reasonable short-term protection to
residential structures to any
unpredicted shoreline change over the
next five years, (3) Provide long-term
protection to homes and infrastructure
over the next 30 years, (4) Maintain the
tax value of homes, properties, and
infrastructure, (5) Use beach compatible
material, (6) Maintain navigation
conditions within Rich Inlet and Nixon
Channel, (7) Maintain recreational
resources, and (8) Balance the needs of
the human environment with the
protection of existing natural resources.
2. Proposed Action. Within the
Town’s preferred alternative, known as
Alternative 5D, the installation of the
terminal groin is the main component in
the protection of the oceanfront
shoreline. The location of the structure
will be approximately 420 feet north of
the initial location described in the
Draft EIS which was published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 29618) on May
18, 2012. The proposed structure is just
north of the existing homes along the
shoulder of Rich Inlet. Its total length is
approximately 1,500 feet, which
approximately 505 feet will project
seaward of the 2007 mean high water
shoreline. The landward 995-foot
anchor section would extend across the
island and terminate near the Nixon
Channel Shoreline. This section will be
constructed of 14,000 to 18,000 square
feet of sheet pile with portions of the
length wrapped with rock. Although
engineering design plans are not
finalized, basic construction design of
the seaward 505-foot part of the
structure will be in the form of a typical
rubble (rock) mound feature supported
by a 1.5-foot thick stone foundation
blanket. Crest height or elevation of this
section is estimated to be + 6.0 feet
NAVD for the first 400 feet and would
slope to a top elevation of + 3.0 feet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:51 Jul 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
NAVD on the seaward end.
Approximately 16,000 tons of stone
would be used to construct the terminal
groin. The concept design of the
structure is intended to allow littoral
sand transport to move over, around,
and through the groin once the accretion
fillet has completely filled in.
Construction of the terminal groin
will be kept within a corridor varying in
width from 50 feet to 200 feet. Within
this corridor, a 40–70 foot wide trench
will be excavated to a depth of ¥2.5 feet
NAVD in order to construct the
foundation of the landward section. The
approximate 6,000 cubic yards of
excavated material will be replaced on
and around the structure once it’s in
place. Material used to build the groin
will be barged down the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), through
Nixon Channel, and either offloaded
onto a temporary loading dock or
directly onto shore. It will then be
transported, via dump trucks, within the
designated corridor to the construction
site.
Material used for nourishment will be
dredged, using a hydraulic cutterhead
plant, from a designated borrow site
within Nixon Channel, which has been
previously used for beach fill needs.
Approximately 294,500 cubic yards will
be required for both the oceanfront
(237,500 cubic yards) and the Nixon
Channel shoreline (57,000 cubic yards)
fill areas under the 2006 and 2012
shoreline study conditions. Beach
compatible material from (3) upland
disposal islands would serve as a
contingency sediment source.
Engineer modeling results have
shown that periodic nourishment will
be required approximately once every
five years to maintain the beach and
Nixon Channel shorelines. The
combined 5-year estimated maintenance
needs for both areas are 320,000 cubic
yards of material under the 2006
condition and 255,000 cubic yards of
material under 2012 condition,
equivalent to approximately 58,000 and
45,000 cubic yards per year
respectively. This material will come
from the designated Nixon Channel
borrow site and the (3) upland disposal
areas.
3. Alternatives. Several alternatives
have been identified and evaluated
through the scoping process, and further
detailed description of all alternatives is
disclosed in Section 3.0 of the
Supplemental EIS. At the time of the
Draft EIS release in 2012, the applicant’s
preferred alternative had been the
Alternative 5B described in Section 3.0
of the SEIS. However, the Figure Eight
Beach HOA evaluated two other minor
variations of this alternative and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
determined that one of those variations,
Alternative 5D, would best suit their
needs. Alternative 5D, the applicant’s
preferred alternative, is to install a
terminal groin structure approximately
420 feet north of Alternatives 5A and
5B, to conduct initial supplemental
beach nourishment, and to implement a
periodic beach nourishment plan over a
30-year period.
4. Scoping Process. To date, a public
scoping meeting was held on March 1,
2007; several Project Delivery Team
(PDT) meetings have been held;
comprising of local, state, and federal
government officials, local residents and
nonprofit organizations; Draft EIS was
released for public comments on May
18, 2012; and a Public Hearing was
conducted on June 7, 2012.
The COE is consulting with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service under the
Endangered Species Act and the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act, and with
the National Marine Fisheries Service
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
Endangered Species Act. Additionally,
the SEIS assesses the potential water
quality impacts pursuant to Section 401
of the Clean Water Act, and is
coordinated with the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (DCM)
to insure the projects consistency with
the Coastal Zone Management Act. The
COE is coordinating closely with DCM
in the development of the SEIS to
ensure the process complies with State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
requirements, as well as the NEPA
requirements. The Supplemental EIS
has been designed to consolidate both
NEPA and SEPA processes to eliminate
duplications.
Dated: July 2, 2015.
Henry Wicker,
Regulatory Division Assistant Chief,
Wilmington District.
[FR Doc. 2015–16941 Filed 7–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39761-39762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16941]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
The Release of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
for the Figure Eight Island Shoreline Management Project, on Figure
Eight Island, New Hanover County, NC
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Wilmington District,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office has received a request for
Department of the Army authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, from
Figure Eight Beach Homeowners' Association Inc. (HOA) to install a
terminal groin structure along Rich Inlet and to conduct a supplemental
beach nourishment on approximately 4,500 linear feet of oceanfront
beach and 1,400 linear feet of back barrier shoreline to protect
residential homes and infrastructures along the central and northern
sections of Figure Eight Island. The terminal groin structure will be
placed perpendicular on the northern tip of the island along the
shoulder of Rich Inlet; and the proposed source of the material for the
nourishment will be dredged from an area within Nixon Channel, a back
barrier channel, that has been previously used for past beach
nourishment projects. In case the quantity of material from Nixon
Channel is not sufficient, material pumped from (3) nearby upland
disposal islands will be used to supplement the nourishment needs. The
majority of the material will be disposed within the fillet area, or
down shore, of the groin. Pending storm events and shoreline changes,
maintenance, or periodic nourishment, of the beach is proposed a
maximum of once every five years, or potential 6 separate events over
the 30-year study period. Nixon Channel and the upland disposal islands
are the proposed material sources for the periodic maintenance, or
renourishment, events.
DATES: Written comments on the Supplemental EIS must be received at
(see ADDRESSES) no later than 5 p.m. on August 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and questions regarding the Supplemental
EIS may be addressed to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District, Regulatory Division. ATTN: File Number 2006-41158, 69
Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403. Copies of the Supplemental EIS
can be reviewed on the Corps homepage at, https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/MajorProjects,
under Figure Eight Island Terminal Groin: Corps ID #SAW-2006-41158.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and SEIS and/or to receive CD or written copies of the Supplemental EIS
can be directed to Mr. Mickey Sugg,
[[Page 39762]]
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, telephone: (910) 251-4811.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Project Purpose and Need. Figure Eight Beach HOA has addressed
the continuing oceanfront erosion problems associated with Rich Inlet
and Nixon Channel erosion hot-spot on the estuarine side of the island
over the past several decades. Past actions to protect the shorelines
have provided some protection, however they are seeking a longer term
solution to handle shoreline erosion in order to protect the island's
$907,352,900 (based on the 2012 reappraisal) assessed property tax
value. Their stated needs of the project continue to be the following:
(1) Reduce erosion along approximately 2.3 miles of oceanfront and 0.34
miles of back barrier shorelines, (2) Provide reasonable short-term
protection to residential structures to any unpredicted shoreline
change over the next five years, (3) Provide long-term protection to
homes and infrastructure over the next 30 years, (4) Maintain the tax
value of homes, properties, and infrastructure, (5) Use beach
compatible material, (6) Maintain navigation conditions within Rich
Inlet and Nixon Channel, (7) Maintain recreational resources, and (8)
Balance the needs of the human environment with the protection of
existing natural resources.
2. Proposed Action. Within the Town's preferred alternative, known
as Alternative 5D, the installation of the terminal groin is the main
component in the protection of the oceanfront shoreline. The location
of the structure will be approximately 420 feet north of the initial
location described in the Draft EIS which was published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 29618) on May 18, 2012. The proposed structure is just
north of the existing homes along the shoulder of Rich Inlet. Its total
length is approximately 1,500 feet, which approximately 505 feet will
project seaward of the 2007 mean high water shoreline. The landward
995-foot anchor section would extend across the island and terminate
near the Nixon Channel Shoreline. This section will be constructed of
14,000 to 18,000 square feet of sheet pile with portions of the length
wrapped with rock. Although engineering design plans are not finalized,
basic construction design of the seaward 505-foot part of the structure
will be in the form of a typical rubble (rock) mound feature supported
by a 1.5-foot thick stone foundation blanket. Crest height or elevation
of this section is estimated to be + 6.0 feet NAVD for the first 400
feet and would slope to a top elevation of + 3.0 feet NAVD on the
seaward end. Approximately 16,000 tons of stone would be used to
construct the terminal groin. The concept design of the structure is
intended to allow littoral sand transport to move over, around, and
through the groin once the accretion fillet has completely filled in.
Construction of the terminal groin will be kept within a corridor
varying in width from 50 feet to 200 feet. Within this corridor, a 40-
70 foot wide trench will be excavated to a depth of -2.5 feet NAVD in
order to construct the foundation of the landward section. The
approximate 6,000 cubic yards of excavated material will be replaced on
and around the structure once it's in place. Material used to build the
groin will be barged down the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW),
through Nixon Channel, and either offloaded onto a temporary loading
dock or directly onto shore. It will then be transported, via dump
trucks, within the designated corridor to the construction site.
Material used for nourishment will be dredged, using a hydraulic
cutterhead plant, from a designated borrow site within Nixon Channel,
which has been previously used for beach fill needs. Approximately
294,500 cubic yards will be required for both the oceanfront (237,500
cubic yards) and the Nixon Channel shoreline (57,000 cubic yards) fill
areas under the 2006 and 2012 shoreline study conditions. Beach
compatible material from (3) upland disposal islands would serve as a
contingency sediment source.
Engineer modeling results have shown that periodic nourishment will
be required approximately once every five years to maintain the beach
and Nixon Channel shorelines. The combined 5-year estimated maintenance
needs for both areas are 320,000 cubic yards of material under the 2006
condition and 255,000 cubic yards of material under 2012 condition,
equivalent to approximately 58,000 and 45,000 cubic yards per year
respectively. This material will come from the designated Nixon Channel
borrow site and the (3) upland disposal areas.
3. Alternatives. Several alternatives have been identified and
evaluated through the scoping process, and further detailed description
of all alternatives is disclosed in Section 3.0 of the Supplemental
EIS. At the time of the Draft EIS release in 2012, the applicant's
preferred alternative had been the Alternative 5B described in Section
3.0 of the SEIS. However, the Figure Eight Beach HOA evaluated two
other minor variations of this alternative and determined that one of
those variations, Alternative 5D, would best suit their needs.
Alternative 5D, the applicant's preferred alternative, is to install a
terminal groin structure approximately 420 feet north of Alternatives
5A and 5B, to conduct initial supplemental beach nourishment, and to
implement a periodic beach nourishment plan over a 30-year period.
4. Scoping Process. To date, a public scoping meeting was held on
March 1, 2007; several Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings have been
held; comprising of local, state, and federal government officials,
local residents and nonprofit organizations; Draft EIS was released for
public comments on May 18, 2012; and a Public Hearing was conducted on
June 7, 2012.
The COE is consulting with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under
the Endangered Species Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,
and with the National Marine Fisheries Service under the Magnuson-
Stevens Act and Endangered Species Act. Additionally, the SEIS assesses
the potential water quality impacts pursuant to Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act, and is coordinated with the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management (DCM) to insure the projects consistency with the
Coastal Zone Management Act. The COE is coordinating closely with DCM
in the development of the SEIS to ensure the process complies with
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, as well as the NEPA
requirements. The Supplemental EIS has been designed to consolidate
both NEPA and SEPA processes to eliminate duplications.
Dated: July 2, 2015.
Henry Wicker,
Regulatory Division Assistant Chief, Wilmington District.
[FR Doc. 2015-16941 Filed 7-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P