Federal Management Regulation; Art-in-Architecture, 39719-39720 [2015-16902]
Download as PDF
39719
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 132
Friday, July 10, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 284
[Docket No. RM15–19–000]
Petition for a Rulemaking of the
Liquids Shippers Group, Airlines for
America, and the National Propane
Gas Association
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Energy.
ACTION: Notice of technical conference.
AGENCY:
In this notice, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) plans to hold a technical
conference on July 30, 2015, to discuss
issues raised by the petition for
rulemaking. The petition for rulemaking
is requesting that the Commission issue
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NOPR) requiring changes to the FERC
Form No. 6 (Annual Report of Oil
Pipeline Companies), Page 700.
DATES: The technical conference will be
held on July 30, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY:
Technical Contact
Adrianne Cook, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426,
Adrianne.Cook@ferc.gov, (202) 502–
8849.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Legal Contacts
David Faerberg, Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426,
David.Faerberg@ferc.gov, (202) 502–
8275.
Rekha Chandrasekher, Office of the
General Counsel, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
Rekha.Chandrasekher@ferc.gov, (202)
502–8865.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jul 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Notice of Technical Conference
On April 20, 2015, the Liquids
Shippers Group, Airlines for America
and the National Propane Gas
Association (Joint Petitioners) filed a
petition for rulemaking requesting that
the Commission issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) requiring
changes to the FERC Form No. 6
(Annual Report of Oil Pipeline
Companies), Page 700.
The Joint Petitioners request that the
Commission issue a NOPR in which it
proposes to revise Form No. 6, Page 700
by (1) requiring a pipeline that (i) files
a single Form No. 6 report for both
crude oil and petroleum product
systems, and/or (ii) has multiple
established and recognized segments
which correspond to how the pipeline’s
rates are established or designed, to file
a separate Page 700 for each individual
system or segment rather than reporting
aggregated cost and revenue data on a
single Page 700; and (2) revising the
Page 700 instructions to require crude
oil and petroleum product pipelines to
make their workpapers available to
shippers and interested persons upon
request, not just to the Commission and
its Staff.
Take notice that the Commission
plans to hold a technical conference on
July 30, 2015, to discuss issues raised by
the petition for rulemaking.
The Commission will issue a
subsequent notice organizing the
conference. The Commission
contemplates utilizing panels to work
through the issues presented. Those
interested in serving on panels are asked
to submit a short notice of intent in the
instant docket, along with the specific
issues they plan to address on or before
July 10, 2015. Due to time constraints,
we may not be able to accommodate all
those interested in speaking.
Dated: June 30, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–16880 Filed 7–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 102–77
[FMR Case 2015–102–3; Docket No. 2015–
0007; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 3090–AJ60
Federal Management Regulation; Artin-Architecture
Office of Government-wide
Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
GSA is proposing to amend
the Federal Management Regulation
(FMR) by revising its coverage of Art-inArchitecture. This proposed rule
provides clarification to the policies that
support the efforts to collect, manage,
fund and commission fine art in Federal
buildings.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addresses
shown below on or before September 8,
2015 to be considered in the formation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSESS: Submit comments in
response to FMR Case 2015–102–3 by
any of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal by
searching for ‘‘FMR Case 2015–102–3.’’
Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘FMR Case 2015–
102–3.’’ Follow the instructions
provided at the ‘‘Comment Now’’
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and ‘‘FMR Case
2015–102–3 on your attached
document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F
Street NW., 2nd. Floor, Washington, DC
20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FMR Case 2015–102–3, in
all correspondence related to this case.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Aluanda Drain, Office of Governmentwide Policy, Office of Asset and
Transportation Management (MA), at
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
39720
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 132 / Friday, July 10, 2015 / Proposed Rules
202–501–1624, or by email at
aluanda.drain@gsa.gov. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat, at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FMR Case 2015–102–3.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
As part of its regular cycle to review
and update its real property policies,
GSA is proposing to revise its policy on
Art-in-Architecture that is located in
FMR part 102–77 (41 CFR part 102–77).
This part was last revised on November
8, 2005 at 70 FR 67847.
proposed rule is also exempt from the
Administrative Procedure Act per 5
U.S.C. 553 (a)(2) because it applies to
agency management or personnel.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the proposed changes
to the FMR do not impose
recordkeeping or information collection
requirements, or the collection of
information from offerors, contractors,
or members of the public that require
the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
create significant civic-scaled artwork of
outstanding quality and value. Federal
agencies should work collaboratively
with the artist, community, and art and
design professionals to produce works
of art that reflect the cultural,
intellectual, and historic interests of the
nation and the community. Federal
agencies should commission artwork
that is diverse in style and media.
■ 4. Revise § 102–77.25 to read as
follows:
§ 102–77.25 Do Federal agencies have
responsibilities to provide national visibility
for Art-in-Architecture?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Changes
The proposed changes to FMR part
102–77 reflect an internal as well as an
interagency collaborative effort. Major
proposed changes include the following:
Section 102–77.10 recommends the
practice of commissioning artwork and
also requires that the art be the work of
living American artists.
Section 102–77.20 proposes that to
the maximum extent possible, agencies
should collaborate with representatives
of the client agency and with others
who are tied to the project to
commission the nation’s most talented
artists.
Section 102–77.25 calls for agencies to
implement the Art-in-Architecture
policies in a manner that receives
national and local visibility to facilitate
participation by a large and diverse
group of American artists.
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed rule is exempt from
Congressional review prescribed by 5
U.S.C. 801 since it relates to agency
management and personnel.
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 102–77
Arts and Crafts.
Yes, Federal agencies should
implement these Art-in-Architecture
policies in a manner that receives
appropriate national and local visibility
to facilitate participation by a large and
diverse group of American artists
representing a wide variety of types of
artwork.
[FR Doc. 2015–16902 Filed 7–9–15; 8:45 am]
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.S.) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action, and therefore was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
■
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
While these revisions are substantive,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jul 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: May 7, 2015.
Giancarlo Brizzi,
Acting Associate Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, GSA proposes to amend 41
CFR part 102–77 as follows:
1. The authority continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121 and 3306.
2. Revise § 102–77.10 to read as
follows:
§ 102–77.10 What basic Art-in-Architecture
policy governs Federal agencies?
Federal agencies must incorporate
fine arts as an integral part of the total
building concept when designing new
Federal buildings, and when making
substantial repairs and alterations to
existing Federal buildings, as
appropriate. The commissioned
artworks—including painting, sculpture
and various other media—must reflect
the national cultural heritage and be the
work of living American artists (citizens
or permanent residents of the United
States).
■ 3. Revise § 102–77.20 to read as
follows:
§ 102–77.20 With whom should Federal
agencies collaborate when commissioning
and selecting art for Federal buildings?
To the maximum extent practicable,
Federal agencies should collaborate
with representatives of the client agency
and the local community, the designer,
and arts professionals to commission
the nation’s most talented artists to
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 88
[NIOSH Docket 094]
PART 102–77—ART-INARCHITECTURE
PO 00000
BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
World Trade Center Health Program;
Petition 008—Autoimmune Diseases;
Finding of Insufficient Evidence
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Denial of petition for addition of
a health condition.
AGENCY:
On May 11, 2015, the
Administrator of the World Trade
Center (WTC) Health Program received
a petition (Petition 008) to add
autoimmune diseases to the List of
WTC-Related Health Conditions (List).
Upon reviewing the information
provided by the petitioner, the
Administrator has determined that
Petition 008 is not substantially
different from Petition 007, which also
requested the addition of autoimmune
diseases. The Administrator recently
published a response to Petition 007 in
the Federal Register and has
determined that Petition 008 does not
provide additional evidence of a causal
relationship between 9/11 exposures
and autoimmune diseases. Accordingly,
the Administrator finds that insufficient
evidence exists to request a
recommendation of the WTC Health
Program Scientific/Technical Advisory
Committee (STAC), to publish a
proposed rule, or to publish a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39719-39720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16902]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 102-77
[FMR Case 2015-102-3; Docket No. 2015-0007; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 3090-AJ60
Federal Management Regulation; Art-in-Architecture
AGENCY: Office of Government-wide Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: GSA is proposing to amend the Federal Management Regulation
(FMR) by revising its coverage of Art-in-Architecture. This proposed
rule provides clarification to the policies that support the efforts to
collect, manage, fund and commission fine art in Federal buildings.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addresses shown below on or before
September 8, 2015 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSESS: Submit comments in response to FMR Case 2015-102-3 by any
of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal by searching for ``FMR Case
2015-102-3.'' Select the link ``Comment Now'' that corresponds with
``FMR Case 2015-102-3.'' Follow the instructions provided at the
``Comment Now'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if
any), and ``FMR Case 2015-102-3 on your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd. Floor,
Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FMR Case 2015-
102-3, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information
provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Aluanda Drain, Office of
Government-wide Policy, Office of Asset and Transportation Management
(MA), at
[[Page 39720]]
202-501-1624, or by email at aluanda.drain@gsa.gov. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat, at 202-501-4755. Please cite FMR Case 2015-102-3.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
As part of its regular cycle to review and update its real property
policies, GSA is proposing to revise its policy on Art-in-Architecture
that is located in FMR part 102-77 (41 CFR part 102-77). This part was
last revised on November 8, 2005 at 70 FR 67847.
Proposed Changes
The proposed changes to FMR part 102-77 reflect an internal as well
as an interagency collaborative effort. Major proposed changes include
the following:
Section 102-77.10 recommends the practice of commissioning artwork
and also requires that the art be the work of living American artists.
Section 102-77.20 proposes that to the maximum extent possible,
agencies should collaborate with representatives of the client agency
and with others who are tied to the project to commission the nation's
most talented artists.
Section 102-77.25 calls for agencies to implement the Art-in-
Architecture policies in a manner that receives national and local
visibility to facilitate participation by a large and diverse group of
American artists.
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.S.) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
While these revisions are substantive, this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601, et seq. This proposed rule is also exempt from the Administrative
Procedure Act per 5 U.S.C. 553 (a)(2) because it applies to agency
management or personnel.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed
changes to the FMR do not impose recordkeeping or information
collection requirements, or the collection of information from
offerors, contractors, or members of the public that require the
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed rule is exempt from Congressional review prescribed
by 5 U.S.C. 801 since it relates to agency management and personnel.
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 102-77
Arts and Crafts.
Dated: May 7, 2015.
Giancarlo Brizzi,
Acting Associate Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, GSA proposes to amend 41
CFR part 102-77 as follows:
PART 102-77--ART-IN-ARCHITECTURE
0
1. The authority continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121 and 3306.
0
2. Revise Sec. 102-77.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 102-77.10 What basic Art-in-Architecture policy governs Federal
agencies?
Federal agencies must incorporate fine arts as an integral part of
the total building concept when designing new Federal buildings, and
when making substantial repairs and alterations to existing Federal
buildings, as appropriate. The commissioned artworks--including
painting, sculpture and various other media--must reflect the national
cultural heritage and be the work of living American artists (citizens
or permanent residents of the United States).
0
3. Revise Sec. 102-77.20 to read as follows:
Sec. 102-77.20 With whom should Federal agencies collaborate when
commissioning and selecting art for Federal buildings?
To the maximum extent practicable, Federal agencies should
collaborate with representatives of the client agency and the local
community, the designer, and arts professionals to commission the
nation's most talented artists to create significant civic-scaled
artwork of outstanding quality and value. Federal agencies should work
collaboratively with the artist, community, and art and design
professionals to produce works of art that reflect the cultural,
intellectual, and historic interests of the nation and the community.
Federal agencies should commission artwork that is diverse in style and
media.
0
4. Revise Sec. 102-77.25 to read as follows:
Sec. 102-77.25 Do Federal agencies have responsibilities to provide
national visibility for Art-in-Architecture?
Yes, Federal agencies should implement these Art-in-Architecture
policies in a manner that receives appropriate national and local
visibility to facilitate participation by a large and diverse group of
American artists representing a wide variety of types of artwork.
[FR Doc. 2015-16902 Filed 7-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P