Registration Review; Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments; Notice of Availability, 39107-39109 [2015-16422]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices
concern to non-listed species have been
identified. No risk mitigation measures
for human health or ecological effects
are included in the interim decision.
Case Closure for Diclofop-methyl (PC
Code: 110902, Case: 2160). Diclofopmethyl is an herbicide which was
labeled for use on wheat, barley, and
golf course turf. On October 23, 2014,
the Agency received a request for
voluntary cancellation of diclofopmethyl from the technical and end-use
registrants; Bayer CropScience and
Bayer Environmental Science,
respectively. EPA subsequently issued a
Federal Register notice announcing
receipt of the request (FRL–9396–04),
and allowed a 30-day period for public
comment on the request. No substantive
comments were received, and on June
10, 2015, EPA issued the cancellation
order for all remaining registrations of
products containing diclofop-methyl
(FRL–9968–03), which sets out the
existing stocks policy for such products.
With the cancellation of all remaining
diclofop-methyl products, the Agency is
announcing the closure of the
registration review case for the active
ingredient.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a
registration review decision is the
Agency’s determination whether a
pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA
has considered the pesticides listed in
the table in this unit in light of the
FIFRA standard for registration. The
Interim Decision documents for these
pesticides in the docket describe the
Agency’s rationale for issuing a
registration review interim decision for
this pesticide.
In addition to an interim registration
review decision document, the
registration review docket for each of
these pesticides may also include other
relevant documents related to the
registration review of the case. A
proposed interim registration review
decision was previously posted to each
docket and the public was invited to
submit any comments or new
information relevant to the proposal.
EPA has addressed the substantive
comments and information received
during the 60-day comment period in
the discussion for each pesticide listed
in this document. During the 60-day
comment period, no public comments
were received for any of these cases that
resulted in changes in the Agency’s
interim decisions.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the
registration review case docket for each
pesticide discussed in this notice will
remain open until all actions required in
the interim decision have been
completed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Jul 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
Background on the registration review
program is provided at: https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
Links to earlier documents related to the
registration review of the pesticide cases
identified in this notice are provided in
the Pesticide Chemical Search data base
accessible at: https://iaspub.epa.gov/
apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–16406 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0386; FRL–9929–23]
Registration Review; Draft Human
Health and Ecological Risk
Assessments; Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s draft human health
and ecological risk assessments for the
registration reviews of flufenacet,
flurprimidol, propoxur, and sodium
acifluorfen, and opens a public
comment period on these documents. In
addition, this notice announces both the
opening of the registration review
docket for thidiazuron and the
availability of the registration review
draft human health and ecological risk
assessments for thidiazuron. The
Agency is opening a public comment
period on both the Preliminary Work
Plan and the draft risk assessments for
thidiazuron. Through this program, EPA
is ensuring that each pesticide’s
registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number for the specific pesticide of
interest provided in Table 1 of Unit III,
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39107
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
pesticide specific information contact
the Chemical Review Manager listed as
the contact in Table 1 of Unit III.
For general questions on the
registration review program, contact:
Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8015; email address:
dumas.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
Chemical Review Manager for the case
in question, listed in Table 1 of Unit III
of this notice.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
39108
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental
effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared
to the general population.
II. Authority
Registration review is EPA’s periodic
review of pesticide registrations to
ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for
registration, that is, the pesticide can
perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of
the registration review process, the
Agency has completed comprehensive
draft human health and ecological risk
assessments, including, in some cases, a
screening level endangered species
assessment, for all uses of these
pesticides. After reviewing comments
received during the public comment
period, EPA may issue revised risk
assessments, explain any changes to the
draft risk assessments, respond to
comments, and request public input on
risk mitigation before completing
proposed registration review decisions
for flufenacet, flurprimidol, propoxur,
sodium acifluorfen, and thidiazuron.
EPA is conducting its registration
review of the pesticide cases listed in
Table 1 of Unit III. of this notice
pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at
40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g)
of FIFRA provides, among other things,
that the registrations of pesticides are to
be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be
registered or remain registered only if it
meets the statutory standard for
registration given in FIFRA section
3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used
in accordance with widespread and
commonly recognized practice, the
pesticide product must perform its
intended function without unreasonable
adverse effects on the environment; that
is, without any unreasonable risk to
man or the environment, or human
dietary risks of concern from residues
that result from the use of a pesticide in
or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g),
EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations for the pesticides listed in
Table 1 of this Unit to ensure that each
pesticide on the list continues to satisfy
the FIFRA standard for registration—
that is, that these pesticides can still be
used without unreasonable adverse
effects on human health or the
environment.
TABLE 1—DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENTS BEING MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Docket ID No.
Chemical review manager and contact
information
Flufenacet, 7245 ................................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0863 .............................
Flurprimidol, 7000 ..............................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0630 .............................
Propoxur, 2555 ..................................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0806 .............................
Sodium acifluorfen, 2605 ...................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0135 .............................
Thidiazuron, 4092 ..............................................
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Registration review case name and No.
EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0381 .............................
Margaret Hathaway, hathaway.margaret@
epa.gov, 703–305–5076.
Kelly Ballard, ballard.kelly@epa.gov, 703–
305–8126.
Brittany Pruitt, pruitt.brittany@epa.gov, 703–
347–0289.
Christina Scheltema, scheltema.christina@
epa.gov, 703–308–2201.
Khue Nguyen, nguyen.khue@epa.gov, 703–
347–0248.
Flufenacet. Draft Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA–HQ–
OPP–2010–0863). Flufenacet is a preemergent, anilide herbicide registered
for use on wheat, perennial grasses
grown for seed, corn for silage, field and
sweet corn, soybeans, and triticale.
There are no registered residential uses
of flufenacet. EPA has completed draft
human health and ecological risk
assessments, including a screening-level
listed species assessment, for all
flufenacet uses. EPA acknowledges that
further refinements to the listed species
assessment will be completed in future
revisions and requests public comment
on specific areas that will reduce the
uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species
identified in the current assessment.
Flurprimidol. Draft Human Health
and Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA–
HQ–OPP–2009–0630). Flurprimidol is a
plant growth regulator belonging to the
pyrimidine class. It is registered for use
on golf courses and ornamental turf; for
landscape/woody ornamental plants
and ornamental trees; and for
ornamental plants grown in containers
in nurseries, greenhouses, and
shadehouses. EPA conducted a
comprehensive human health risk
assessment and did not identify any
risks of concern for dietary, residential,
or occupational exposures. EPA also
conducted a screening level ecological
risk assessment that addressed only the
tree injection use of flurprimidol.
Potential risks to birds, mammals, and
plants were identified. All other uses of
flurprimidol were addressed in a 2010
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Jul 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ecological risk assessment, which is
posted to the registration review docket.
An endangered species assessment has
not been completed for flurprimidol at
this time.
Propoxur. Draft Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0806). Propoxur is a
carbamate insecticide registered for use
by pest control operators to kill a variety
of insects including crickets, ants,
cockroaches, and silverfish. It is
registered for use in and around
residential, industrial, institutional, and
commercial facilities (including food
handling establishments and food
processing plants). EPA has completed
draft human health and ecological risk
assessments, including a screening-level
listed species assessment for all
propoxur uses. EPA acknowledges that
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices
further refinements to the listed species
assessment will be completed in future
revisions and requests public comment
on specific areas that will reduce the
uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species
identified in the current assessment.
Sodium acifluorfen. Draft Human
Health and Ecological Risk Assessments
(EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0135). Sodium
acifluorfen is a post-emergent herbicide
registered for use on peanuts, soybeans,
strawberries, and rice. EPA has
completed draft human health and
ecological risk assessments for all
sodium acifluorfen uses. There are no
anticipated human health risks of
concern. The draft ecological risk
assessment indicates that there is direct
risk of adverse effects to non-target
organisms, including fish, birds, and
mammals, and species for which these
taxa serve as surrogates, and non-target
terrestrial plants. The assessment did
not find risks of concern for aquatic
plants.
Thidiazuron. Combined Docket
Opening and Release of Draft Human
Health and Ecological Risk Assessments
(EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0381).
Thidiazuron is a plant growth regulator
registered for use as a defoliant on
cotton. There are no non-agricultural
uses of thidiazuron. EPA has completed
a combined problem formulation/
preliminary ecological risk assessment
and combined scoping document/
preliminary human health risk
assessment for thidiazuron. No human
health risks of concern were identified.
The ecological risk assessment indicated
potential risks of concern to birds,
terrestrial-phase amphibians, reptiles,
and terrestrial plants. The Agency did
not complete an endangered species risk
assessment.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is
providing an opportunity, through this
notice of availability, for interested
parties to provide comments and input
concerning the Agency’s draft human
health and ecological risk assessments
for these pesticides. Such comments
could address, among other things, the
Agency’s risk assessment methodologies
and assumptions, as applied to these
draft risk assessments. The Agency will
consider all comments received during
the public comment period and make
changes, as appropriate, to the draft
human health and ecological risk
assessments. EPA may then issue
revised risk assessments, explain any
changes to the draft risk assessments,
and respond to comments. In the
Federal Register notice announcing the
availability of any such revised risk
assessments for these pesticides, if the
revised risk assessments indicate risks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Jul 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
of concern, the Agency may provide a
comment period for the public to submit
suggestions for mitigating the risks
identified in the revised risk
assessments before developing a
proposed registration review decision
on the affected pesticide.
1. Other related information.
Additional information on the
individual pesticides discussed in this
notice is available through the Pesticide
Registration Review Status Web page, at
https://www2.epa.gov/pesticidereevaluation/individual-pesticidesregistration-review. Information on the
Agency’s registration review program
and its implementing regulation is
available at https://www2.epa.gov/
pesticide-reevaluation.
2. Information submission
requirements. Anyone may submit data
or information in response to this
document. To be considered during a
pesticide’s registration review, the
submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
• To ensure that EPA will consider
data or information submitted,
interested persons must submit the data
or information during the comment
period. The Agency may, at its
discretion, consider data or information
submitted at a later date.
• The data or information submitted
must be presented in a legible and
useable form. For example, an English
translation must accompany any
material that is not in English and a
written transcript must accompany any
information submitted as an
audiographic or videographic record.
Written material may be submitted in
paper or electronic form.
• Submitters must clearly identify the
source of any submitted data or
information.
• Submitters may request the Agency
to reconsider data or information that
the Agency rejected in a previous
review. However, submitters must
explain why they believe the Agency
should reconsider the data or
information in the pesticide’s
registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the
registration review docket for each
pesticide case will remain publicly
accessible through the duration of the
registration review process; that is, until
all actions required in the final decision
on the registration review case have
been completed.
PO 00000
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39109
Dated: June 22, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–16422 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[DA 15–679]
Media Bureau Announces Incentive
Auction Eligible Facilities and Deadline
for Filing Pre-Auction Technical
Certification Form
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This document announces
each full power and Class A station
facility eligible for protection in the
repacking process and for
relinquishment in the reverse auction
(i.e., ‘‘eligible facility’’), as well as the
date by which a licensee with a eligible
facility must file a Pre-Auction
Technical Certification Form (FCC Form
2100, Schedule 381) (approved under
OMB control under 3060–1206). An
Appendix is attached to the Public
Notice listing each eligible facility. The
Public Notice also establishes a process
for licensees to file a Petition for Eligible
Entity Status in order to request that a
facility not listed in the Appendix
attached to the Public Notice be treated
as an eligible facility.
DATES: The deadline for filing a PreAuction Technical Certification Form
(FCC Form 2100, Schedule 381) is July
9, 2015. The deadline for filing a
Petition for Eligible Entity Status is July
9, 2015. If granted, the Bureau will
notify the petitioner of the date by
which it must file its Pre-Auction
Technical Certification Form as part of
its decision. Furthermore, if the
Commission grants a petition for
reconsideration of the Incentive Auction
R&O and in doing so extends
discretionary protection to a different
facility, or a facility that is not currently
listed in the Appendix attached to the
Public Notice, the licensee must file a
Pre-Auction Technical Certification
Form for each eligible facility no later
than seven (7) days after release of the
Commission’s decision or by July 9,
2015, whichever is later.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Harding, Hossein Hashemzadeh,
or Evan Morris, Video Division, Media
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, (202) 418–1600.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39107-39109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16422]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0386; FRL-9929-23]
Registration Review; Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk
Assessments; Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's draft human
health and ecological risk assessments for the registration reviews of
flufenacet, flurprimidol, propoxur, and sodium acifluorfen, and opens a
public comment period on these documents. In addition, this notice
announces both the opening of the registration review docket for
thidiazuron and the availability of the registration review draft human
health and ecological risk assessments for thidiazuron. The Agency is
opening a public comment period on both the Preliminary Work Plan and
the draft risk assessments for thidiazuron. Through this program, EPA
is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health
and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in Table 1
of Unit III, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information
contact the Chemical Review Manager listed as the contact in Table 1 of
Unit III.
For general questions on the registration review program, contact:
Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8015;
email address: dumas.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the case in question, listed in
Table 1 of Unit III of this notice.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked
[[Page 39108]]
will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. Authority
Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed comprehensive draft human health and
ecological risk assessments, including, in some cases, a screening
level endangered species assessment, for all uses of these pesticides.
After reviewing comments received during the public comment period, EPA
may issue revised risk assessments, explain any changes to the draft
risk assessments, respond to comments, and request public input on risk
mitigation before completing proposed registration review decisions for
flufenacet, flurprimidol, propoxur, sodium acifluorfen, and
thidiazuron.
EPA is conducting its registration review of the pesticide cases
listed in Table 1 of Unit III. of this notice pursuant to section 3(g)
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and
the Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155,
subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or human dietary risks of concern from residues that
result from the use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations for the pesticides listed in Table 1 of this Unit to
ensure that each pesticide on the list continues to satisfy the FIFRA
standard for registration--that is, that these pesticides can still be
used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the
environment.
Table 1--Draft Risk Assessments Being Made Available for Public Comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical review
Registration review case name manager and
and No. Docket ID No. contact
information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flufenacet, 7245................ EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-08 Margaret Hathaway,
63. hathaway.margaret@epa.gov, 703-305-
5076.
Flurprimidol, 7000.............. EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-06 Kelly Ballard,
30. ballard.kelly@epa.gov, 703-305-
8126.
Propoxur, 2555.................. EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-08 Brittany Pruitt,
06. pruitt.brittany@epa.gov, 703-347-
0289.
Sodium acifluorfen, 2605........ EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-01 Christina
35. Scheltema,
scheltema.christina@epa.gov, 703-
308-2201.
Thidiazuron, 4092............... EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-03 Khue Nguyen,
81. nguyen.khue@epa.gov, 703-347-0248.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flufenacet. Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments
(EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0863). Flufenacet is a pre-emergent, anilide herbicide
registered for use on wheat, perennial grasses grown for seed, corn for
silage, field and sweet corn, soybeans, and triticale. There are no
registered residential uses of flufenacet. EPA has completed draft
human health and ecological risk assessments, including a screening-
level listed species assessment, for all flufenacet uses. EPA
acknowledges that further refinements to the listed species assessment
will be completed in future revisions and requests public comment on
specific areas that will reduce the uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species identified in the current
assessment.
Flurprimidol. Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments
(EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0630). Flurprimidol is a plant growth regulator
belonging to the pyrimidine class. It is registered for use on golf
courses and ornamental turf; for landscape/woody ornamental plants and
ornamental trees; and for ornamental plants grown in containers in
nurseries, greenhouses, and shadehouses. EPA conducted a comprehensive
human health risk assessment and did not identify any risks of concern
for dietary, residential, or occupational exposures. EPA also conducted
a screening level ecological risk assessment that addressed only the
tree injection use of flurprimidol. Potential risks to birds, mammals,
and plants were identified. All other uses of flurprimidol were
addressed in a 2010 ecological risk assessment, which is posted to the
registration review docket. An endangered species assessment has not
been completed for flurprimidol at this time.
Propoxur. Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA-
HQ-OPP-2009-0806). Propoxur is a carbamate insecticide registered for
use by pest control operators to kill a variety of insects including
crickets, ants, cockroaches, and silverfish. It is registered for use
in and around residential, industrial, institutional, and commercial
facilities (including food handling establishments and food processing
plants). EPA has completed draft human health and ecological risk
assessments, including a screening-level listed species assessment for
all propoxur uses. EPA acknowledges that
[[Page 39109]]
further refinements to the listed species assessment will be completed
in future revisions and requests public comment on specific areas that
will reduce the uncertainties associated with the characterization of
risk to listed species identified in the current assessment.
Sodium acifluorfen. Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk
Assessments (EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0135). Sodium acifluorfen is a post-
emergent herbicide registered for use on peanuts, soybeans,
strawberries, and rice. EPA has completed draft human health and
ecological risk assessments for all sodium acifluorfen uses. There are
no anticipated human health risks of concern. The draft ecological risk
assessment indicates that there is direct risk of adverse effects to
non-target organisms, including fish, birds, and mammals, and species
for which these taxa serve as surrogates, and non-target terrestrial
plants. The assessment did not find risks of concern for aquatic
plants.
Thidiazuron. Combined Docket Opening and Release of Draft Human
Health and Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0381).
Thidiazuron is a plant growth regulator registered for use as a
defoliant on cotton. There are no non-agricultural uses of thidiazuron.
EPA has completed a combined problem formulation/preliminary ecological
risk assessment and combined scoping document/preliminary human health
risk assessment for thidiazuron. No human health risks of concern were
identified. The ecological risk assessment indicated potential risks of
concern to birds, terrestrial-phase amphibians, reptiles, and
terrestrial plants. The Agency did not complete an endangered species
risk assessment.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is providing an opportunity,
through this notice of availability, for interested parties to provide
comments and input concerning the Agency's draft human health and
ecological risk assessments for these pesticides. Such comments could
address, among other things, the Agency's risk assessment methodologies
and assumptions, as applied to these draft risk assessments. The Agency
will consider all comments received during the public comment period
and make changes, as appropriate, to the draft human health and
ecological risk assessments. EPA may then issue revised risk
assessments, explain any changes to the draft risk assessments, and
respond to comments. In the Federal Register notice announcing the
availability of any such revised risk assessments for these pesticides,
if the revised risk assessments indicate risks of concern, the Agency
may provide a comment period for the public to submit suggestions for
mitigating the risks identified in the revised risk assessments before
developing a proposed registration review decision on the affected
pesticide.
1. Other related information. Additional information on the
individual pesticides discussed in this notice is available through the
Pesticide Registration Review Status Web page, at https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/individual-pesticides-registration-review.
Information on the Agency's registration review program and its
implementing regulation is available at https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
2. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or
information in response to this document. To be considered during a
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider
data or information submitted at a later date.
The data or information submitted must be presented in a
legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript
must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or
videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or
electronic form.
Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions
required in the final decision on the registration review case have
been completed.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: June 22, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-16422 Filed 7-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P