Registration Review Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability, 39105-39107 [2015-16406]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices
sabproduct.nsf/fedrgstr_activites/
CCL%204?OpenDocument.
Technical Contacts: Any technical
questions concerning EPA’s draft CCL 4
should be directed to Ms. Meredith
Russell in the EPA Office of Water, by
telephone at (202) 564–0814 or by email
at Russell.Meredith@epa.gov.
Availability of Meeting Materials:
Prior to the meeting, the review
documents, agenda and other materials
will be accessible through the calendar
link on the blue navigation bar at
https://www.epa.gov/sab/. Materials may
also be accessed at the URL provided
above.
Procedures for Providing Public Input:
Public comment for consideration by
EPA’s federal advisory committees and
panels has a different purpose from
public comment provided to EPA
program offices. Therefore, the process
for submitting comments to a federal
advisory committee is different from the
process used to submit comments to an
EPA program office. Federal advisory
committees and panels, including
scientific advisory committees, provide
independent advice to the EPA.
Interested members of the public may
submit relevant information on the topic
of this advisory activity, and/or the
group conducting the activity, for the
SAB to consider during the advisory
process. Input from the public to the
SAB will have the most impact if it
provides specific scientific or technical
information or analysis for SAB
committees and panels to consider or if
it relates to the clarity or accuracy of the
technical information. Members of the
public wishing to provide comment
should contact the DFO directly. Oral
Statements: In general, individuals or
groups requesting an oral presentation
at the teleconference will be limited to
three minutes. Interested parties
wishing to provide comments should
contact Ms. Sanzone, DFO, in writing
(preferably via email) at the contact
information noted above by July 27,
2015, to be placed on the list of public
speakers for the meeting. Written
Statements: Written statements will be
accepted throughout the advisory
process; however, for timely
consideration by Committee members,
statements should be supplied to the
DFO (preferably via email) at the contact
information noted above by July 27,
2015. It is the SAB Staff Office general
policy to post written comments on the
Web page for advisory meetings.
Submitters are requested to provide an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Jul 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
unsigned version of each document
because the SAB Staff Office does not
publish documents with signatures on
its Web sites. Members of the public
should be aware that their personal
contact information, if included in any
written comments, may be posted to the
SAB Web site. Copyrighted material will
not be posted without explicit
permission of the copyright holder.
Accessibility: For information on
access or services for individuals with
disabilities, please contact Ms. Sanzone
at the contact information provided
above. To request accommodation of a
disability, please contact Ms. Sanzone
preferably at least ten days prior to the
meeting to give EPA as much time as
possible to process your request.
Dated: June 30, 2015.
Thomas H. Brennan,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board
Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2015–16721 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0393; FRL–9929–24]
Registration Review Interim Decisions;
Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s interim registration
review decisions for the pesticides
listed in the table in Unit II of this
notice. Registration review is EPA’s
periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each
pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that
is, that the pesticide can perform its
intended function without causing
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. Through this
program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide’s registration is based on
current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment. This document
also announces the Agency’s closure of
the registration review docket diclofopmethyl. All pesticide products
containing diclofop-methyl have been
cancelled.
SUMMARY:
For
pesticide specific information, contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39105
the Chemical Review Manager
identified in the table in Unit II. for the
pesticide of interest.
For general information on the
registration review program, contact:
Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8015; email address:
dumas.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
Chemical Review Manager identified in
the table in Unit II. for the pesticide of
interest.
B. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
The docket for this action, identified
by docket identification (ID) number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0393, is available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. What action is the agency taking?
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this
notice announces the availability of
EPA’s interim registration review
decisions for the pesticides in the
following table:
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
39106
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices
TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW INTERIM DECISIONS
Docket ID No.
Chemical review manager and contact
information
Acetic acid and sodium diacetate, 4001 ...........
EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0016 .............................
Fosetyl-Al, 0646 .................................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0379 .............................
Picaridin, 7433 ...................................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0341 .............................
Sodium fluoride, 3132 .......................................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0655 .............................
Yellow mustard seed/sulfonic acid salts, 7619/
7618.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Registration review case name and No.
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0762 .............................
Cathryn
Britton,
britton.cathryn@epa.gov,
(703) 308–0136.
Ricardo Jones, jones.ricardo@epa.gov, (703)
347–0493.
Ricardo Jones, jones.ricardo@epa.gov, (703)
347–0493.
SanYvette
Williams,
williams.Sanyvette@
epa.gov, (703) 305–7702.
Roy Johnson, johnson.roy@epa.gov, (703)
347–0492.
The registration review final decisions
for these cases are dependent on the
assessments of listed species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA),
determinations on the potential for
endocrine disruption, and/or pollinator
risk assessments.
Acetic acid and sodium diacetate
(Interim Decision). The registration
review docket for acetic acid and
sodium diacetate opened in March
2008. Acetic acid and sodium diacetate
are two different active ingredients;
sodium diacetate is a salt of acetic acid.
Acetic acid is used as a preservative for
post-harvest stored grains and hay
intended for livestock feed. It is also
applied as a non-selective herbicide for
control of broadleaf weeds and grasses.
Sodium diacetate is a fungicide and
bactericide registered to control molds
and bacteria. It is applied to hay to
prevent spoilage and to silage as an aid
in fermentation. The Agency has
determined that previous human health
assessments for acetic acid and sodium
diacetate are sufficient for registration
review and no human health risks of
concern have been identified. The
Agency completed a comprehensive
ecological risk assessment for the
nonselective herbicide use of acetic
acid, including an endangered species
assessment, and a qualitative ecological
risk assessment for sodium diacetate.
The Agency has made a No Effect
determination for acetic acid used as a
nonselective herbicide and all currently
registered uses of sodium diacetate for
all non-target organisms. EPA published
the Acetic Acid and Sodium Diacetate
Proposed Interim Decision in December
2014. One comment was received from
the Center for Biological Diversity
concurring with EPA’s No Effect
determination. No risk mitigation
measures for human health or ecological
effects are included in the interim
decision.
Fosetyl-Al (Interim Decision). FosetylAl is a phosphonate fungicide registered
for use to control various oomycyete
pathogens that cause fungal diseases on
numerous crops. Fosetyl-Al is registered
for use on agricultural crops including
avocado, caneberries, citrus, grape,
stone fruit, strawberry, certain tree nuts,
tobacco, and certain vegetables. It is also
registered for commercial use on
ornamentals, turf, and conifer nurseries.
EPA conducted quantitative risk
assessments for both human health and
ecological risk. The Agency also
completed a partial screening level
endangered species assessment, making
a No Effects determination for listed
species of fish, aquatic invertebrates,
aquatic plans, and monocot plants. No
human health risks of concern were
identified. The ecological risk
assessment indicated potential risks to
birds, mammals, terrestrial and aquatic
plants, and terrestrial invertebrates. In
the Federal Register of December 24,
2014 (79 FR 77480) (FRL–9919–24), the
Agency issued its Proposed Interim
Registration Review Decision for fosetylAl for public comment. Fourteen
comments were received, including
comments on the Agency’s proposal to
increase the Restricted Entry Interval,
require additional pollinator data and
add pollinator advisory language to
labels. The Agency’s Interim Decision
modifies the application directions for
fosetyl-Al to mitigate ecological risks
and updates labels to reflect current
Agency policy for worker protection. It
does not require additional pollinator
data or pollinator advisory language on
the product labels.
Picaridin (Interim Decision). Picaridin
is a broad-spectrum insect repellent
registered for use against biting flies,
chiggers, fleas, mosquitoes, and ticks.
Picaridin is labeled for use on human
skin and footwear. The Agency
completed qualitative ecological and
human health risk assessments for
picaridin, and found no risks of
concern. The Agency has made a No
Effects determination under the
Endangered Species Assessment (ESA)
for all listed species and No
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Jul 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Modification of designated critical
habitat for such species. In the Federal
Register of December 24, 2014 (79 FR
77480) (FRL–9919–24), EPA issued the
Combined Work Plan and Proposed
Interim Registration Review Decision,
indicating that no additional data would
be needed for the picaridin registration
review. Two comments were received,
neither of which modified the proposed
decision or work plan for picaridin. No
risk mitigation measures for human
health or ecological effects are included
in the interim decision.
Sodium fluoride (Interim Decision).
Sodium fluoride is registered for use as
a wood preservative to protect the
groundline portion of existing wooden
utility poles. It is formulated as an
impregnated pole wrap material. This
use is not expected to result in direct or
indirect food or drinking water
exposure. Occupational and residential
exposure is minimal by the dermal and
inhalation routes, and the Agency has
determined that a human health risk
assessment was not needed. Based on
the lack of potential exposure and toxic
effects to fish, aquatic invertebrates, and
birds, the Agency has made a No Effect
determination for federally listed
species and designated critical habitat.
Yellow mustard seed/sulfonic acid
salts (Interim Decision). Yellow mustard
seed and sulfonic acid salts are coformulated as a rodenticide registered
for the control of ground squirrels in
rangelands, ornamental plantings, seed
orchards and nurseries, golf courses,
parks, and rights-of-way. The product is
delivered into burrows occupied by
these rodents through a modified handheld spray wand with an aspirating
muzzle to facilitate foaming action. The
Agency relied on qualitative
assessments conducted for yellow
mustard seed/sulfonic acid salts at the
time of the initial registration, and the
Agency did not believe that updated or
quantitative assessments were needed
for registration review. No human
health risks of concern or risks of
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices
concern to non-listed species have been
identified. No risk mitigation measures
for human health or ecological effects
are included in the interim decision.
Case Closure for Diclofop-methyl (PC
Code: 110902, Case: 2160). Diclofopmethyl is an herbicide which was
labeled for use on wheat, barley, and
golf course turf. On October 23, 2014,
the Agency received a request for
voluntary cancellation of diclofopmethyl from the technical and end-use
registrants; Bayer CropScience and
Bayer Environmental Science,
respectively. EPA subsequently issued a
Federal Register notice announcing
receipt of the request (FRL–9396–04),
and allowed a 30-day period for public
comment on the request. No substantive
comments were received, and on June
10, 2015, EPA issued the cancellation
order for all remaining registrations of
products containing diclofop-methyl
(FRL–9968–03), which sets out the
existing stocks policy for such products.
With the cancellation of all remaining
diclofop-methyl products, the Agency is
announcing the closure of the
registration review case for the active
ingredient.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a
registration review decision is the
Agency’s determination whether a
pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA
has considered the pesticides listed in
the table in this unit in light of the
FIFRA standard for registration. The
Interim Decision documents for these
pesticides in the docket describe the
Agency’s rationale for issuing a
registration review interim decision for
this pesticide.
In addition to an interim registration
review decision document, the
registration review docket for each of
these pesticides may also include other
relevant documents related to the
registration review of the case. A
proposed interim registration review
decision was previously posted to each
docket and the public was invited to
submit any comments or new
information relevant to the proposal.
EPA has addressed the substantive
comments and information received
during the 60-day comment period in
the discussion for each pesticide listed
in this document. During the 60-day
comment period, no public comments
were received for any of these cases that
resulted in changes in the Agency’s
interim decisions.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the
registration review case docket for each
pesticide discussed in this notice will
remain open until all actions required in
the interim decision have been
completed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Jul 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
Background on the registration review
program is provided at: https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
Links to earlier documents related to the
registration review of the pesticide cases
identified in this notice are provided in
the Pesticide Chemical Search data base
accessible at: https://iaspub.epa.gov/
apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–16406 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0386; FRL–9929–23]
Registration Review; Draft Human
Health and Ecological Risk
Assessments; Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s draft human health
and ecological risk assessments for the
registration reviews of flufenacet,
flurprimidol, propoxur, and sodium
acifluorfen, and opens a public
comment period on these documents. In
addition, this notice announces both the
opening of the registration review
docket for thidiazuron and the
availability of the registration review
draft human health and ecological risk
assessments for thidiazuron. The
Agency is opening a public comment
period on both the Preliminary Work
Plan and the draft risk assessments for
thidiazuron. Through this program, EPA
is ensuring that each pesticide’s
registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number for the specific pesticide of
interest provided in Table 1 of Unit III,
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39107
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
pesticide specific information contact
the Chemical Review Manager listed as
the contact in Table 1 of Unit III.
For general questions on the
registration review program, contact:
Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8015; email address:
dumas.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
Chemical Review Manager for the case
in question, listed in Table 1 of Unit III
of this notice.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39105-39107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0393; FRL-9929-24]
Registration Review Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's interim
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in the table in
Unit II of this notice. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of
pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, that the
pesticide can perform its intended function without causing
unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment.
Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's
registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health and the environment. This
document also announces the Agency's closure of the registration review
docket diclofop-methyl. All pesticide products containing diclofop-
methyl have been cancelled.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information,
contact the Chemical Review Manager identified in the table in Unit II.
for the pesticide of interest.
For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-8015; email address: dumas.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager identified in the table in Unit II.
for the pesticide of interest.
B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?
The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0393, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. What action is the agency taking?
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this notice announces the
availability of EPA's interim registration review decisions for the
pesticides in the following table:
[[Page 39106]]
Table--Registration Review Interim Decisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical review
Registration review case name manager and
and No. Docket ID No. contact
information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acetic acid and sodium EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-00 Cathryn Britton,
diacetate, 4001. 16. britton.cathryn@epa.gov, (703) 308-
0136.
Fosetyl-Al, 0646................ EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-03 Ricardo Jones,
79. jones.ricardo@epa.gov, (703) 347-
0493.
Picaridin, 7433................. EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-03 Ricardo Jones,
41. jones.ricardo@epa.gov, (703) 347-
0493.
Sodium fluoride, 3132........... EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-06 SanYvette
55. Williams,
williams.Sanyvette@epa.gov, (703)
305-7702.
Yellow mustard seed/sulfonic EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-07 Roy Johnson,
acid salts, 7619/7618. 62. johnson.roy@epa.gov, (703) 347-
0492.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The registration review final decisions for these cases are
dependent on the assessments of listed species under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), determinations on the potential for endocrine
disruption, and/or pollinator risk assessments.
Acetic acid and sodium diacetate (Interim Decision). The
registration review docket for acetic acid and sodium diacetate opened
in March 2008. Acetic acid and sodium diacetate are two different
active ingredients; sodium diacetate is a salt of acetic acid. Acetic
acid is used as a preservative for post-harvest stored grains and hay
intended for livestock feed. It is also applied as a non-selective
herbicide for control of broadleaf weeds and grasses. Sodium diacetate
is a fungicide and bactericide registered to control molds and
bacteria. It is applied to hay to prevent spoilage and to silage as an
aid in fermentation. The Agency has determined that previous human
health assessments for acetic acid and sodium diacetate are sufficient
for registration review and no human health risks of concern have been
identified. The Agency completed a comprehensive ecological risk
assessment for the nonselective herbicide use of acetic acid, including
an endangered species assessment, and a qualitative ecological risk
assessment for sodium diacetate. The Agency has made a No Effect
determination for acetic acid used as a nonselective herbicide and all
currently registered uses of sodium diacetate for all non-target
organisms. EPA published the Acetic Acid and Sodium Diacetate Proposed
Interim Decision in December 2014. One comment was received from the
Center for Biological Diversity concurring with EPA's No Effect
determination. No risk mitigation measures for human health or
ecological effects are included in the interim decision.
Fosetyl-Al (Interim Decision). Fosetyl-Al is a phosphonate
fungicide registered for use to control various oomycyete pathogens
that cause fungal diseases on numerous crops. Fosetyl-Al is registered
for use on agricultural crops including avocado, caneberries, citrus,
grape, stone fruit, strawberry, certain tree nuts, tobacco, and certain
vegetables. It is also registered for commercial use on ornamentals,
turf, and conifer nurseries. EPA conducted quantitative risk
assessments for both human health and ecological risk. The Agency also
completed a partial screening level endangered species assessment,
making a No Effects determination for listed species of fish, aquatic
invertebrates, aquatic plans, and monocot plants. No human health risks
of concern were identified. The ecological risk assessment indicated
potential risks to birds, mammals, terrestrial and aquatic plants, and
terrestrial invertebrates. In the Federal Register of December 24, 2014
(79 FR 77480) (FRL-9919-24), the Agency issued its Proposed Interim
Registration Review Decision for fosetyl-Al for public comment.
Fourteen comments were received, including comments on the Agency's
proposal to increase the Restricted Entry Interval, require additional
pollinator data and add pollinator advisory language to labels. The
Agency's Interim Decision modifies the application directions for
fosetyl-Al to mitigate ecological risks and updates labels to reflect
current Agency policy for worker protection. It does not require
additional pollinator data or pollinator advisory language on the
product labels.
Picaridin (Interim Decision). Picaridin is a broad-spectrum insect
repellent registered for use against biting flies, chiggers, fleas,
mosquitoes, and ticks. Picaridin is labeled for use on human skin and
footwear. The Agency completed qualitative ecological and human health
risk assessments for picaridin, and found no risks of concern. The
Agency has made a No Effects determination under the Endangered Species
Assessment (ESA) for all listed species and No Modification of
designated critical habitat for such species. In the Federal Register
of December 24, 2014 (79 FR 77480) (FRL-9919-24), EPA issued the
Combined Work Plan and Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision,
indicating that no additional data would be needed for the picaridin
registration review. Two comments were received, neither of which
modified the proposed decision or work plan for picaridin. No risk
mitigation measures for human health or ecological effects are included
in the interim decision.
Sodium fluoride (Interim Decision). Sodium fluoride is registered
for use as a wood preservative to protect the groundline portion of
existing wooden utility poles. It is formulated as an impregnated pole
wrap material. This use is not expected to result in direct or indirect
food or drinking water exposure. Occupational and residential exposure
is minimal by the dermal and inhalation routes, and the Agency has
determined that a human health risk assessment was not needed. Based on
the lack of potential exposure and toxic effects to fish, aquatic
invertebrates, and birds, the Agency has made a No Effect determination
for federally listed species and designated critical habitat.
Yellow mustard seed/sulfonic acid salts (Interim Decision). Yellow
mustard seed and sulfonic acid salts are co-formulated as a rodenticide
registered for the control of ground squirrels in rangelands,
ornamental plantings, seed orchards and nurseries, golf courses, parks,
and rights-of-way. The product is delivered into burrows occupied by
these rodents through a modified hand-held spray wand with an
aspirating muzzle to facilitate foaming action. The Agency relied on
qualitative assessments conducted for yellow mustard seed/sulfonic acid
salts at the time of the initial registration, and the Agency did not
believe that updated or quantitative assessments were needed for
registration review. No human health risks of concern or risks of
[[Page 39107]]
concern to non-listed species have been identified. No risk mitigation
measures for human health or ecological effects are included in the
interim decision.
Case Closure for Diclofop-methyl (PC Code: 110902, Case: 2160).
Diclofop-methyl is an herbicide which was labeled for use on wheat,
barley, and golf course turf. On October 23, 2014, the Agency received
a request for voluntary cancellation of diclofop-methyl from the
technical and end-use registrants; Bayer CropScience and Bayer
Environmental Science, respectively. EPA subsequently issued a Federal
Register notice announcing receipt of the request (FRL-9396-04), and
allowed a 30-day period for public comment on the request. No
substantive comments were received, and on June 10, 2015, EPA issued
the cancellation order for all remaining registrations of products
containing diclofop-methyl (FRL-9968-03), which sets out the existing
stocks policy for such products. With the cancellation of all remaining
diclofop-methyl products, the Agency is announcing the closure of the
registration review case for the active ingredient.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a registration review decision is the
Agency's determination whether a pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA has considered the pesticides
listed in the table in this unit in light of the FIFRA standard for
registration. The Interim Decision documents for these pesticides in
the docket describe the Agency's rationale for issuing a registration
review interim decision for this pesticide.
In addition to an interim registration review decision document,
the registration review docket for each of these pesticides may also
include other relevant documents related to the registration review of
the case. A proposed interim registration review decision was
previously posted to each docket and the public was invited to submit
any comments or new information relevant to the proposal.
EPA has addressed the substantive comments and information received
during the 60-day comment period in the discussion for each pesticide
listed in this document. During the 60-day comment period, no public
comments were received for any of these cases that resulted in changes
in the Agency's interim decisions.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the registration review case docket
for each pesticide discussed in this notice will remain open until all
actions required in the interim decision have been completed.
Background on the registration review program is provided at:
https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. Links to earlier documents
related to the registration review of the pesticide cases identified in
this notice are provided in the Pesticide Chemical Search data base
accessible at: https://iaspub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-16406 Filed 7-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P