Notice of Availability of the Records of Decision for the Provo River Delta Restoration Project, 38730-38731 [2015-16600]
Download as PDF
38730
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 7, 2015 / Notices
at which listing is no longer appropriate
under the criteria set out in section
4(a)(1) of the Act. The Act requires the
development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not
promote the conservation of a particular
species.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Species History
The Austin blind salamander was
federally listed as endangered
throughout its range on September 9,
2013 (78 FR 51277), and detailed
background information on the
taxonomy, habitat, range, threats, and
life history attributes of the Austin blind
salamander can be found in the final
rule. It has a recovery priority number
of 2C, which is based on a high degree
of threat, high potential for recovery,
taxonomic classification as a species,
and potential for conflict over resources
(primarily water quality and quantity)
and economic development.
When we developed the Barton
Springs Salamander Recovery Plan, the
Austin blind salamander was a
candidate for Federal listing as
endangered or threatened (67 FR 40657).
We included information on the Austin
blind salamander to facilitate adding
this species to the Recovery Plan if it
ultimately became listed. The existing
recovery plan for the Barton Springs
salamander presents a recovery strategy,
objective and measurable recovery
criteria, and site-specific management
actions to monitor and reduce or remove
threats to the Barton Springs
salamander. The Barton Springs and
Austin blind salamanders occur in the
same ecosystem, have similar ecology
and life history needs, and face similar
threats. The Barton Springs Salamander
Recovery Plan was developed to address
the Barton Springs ecosystem as a
whole, as well as both salamander
species, which are vulnerable to threats
to this ecosystem. Therefore, the
recovery strategy for the Barton Springs
salamander is also applicable to and
appropriate for the Austin blind
salamander. For these reasons, we are
proposing an efficient approach to
recovery planning for the Austin blind
salamander by supplementing the
Barton Springs Salamander Recovery
Plan with an addendum to include the
Austin blind salamander.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to
provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development. We are, therefore,
providing the public the opportunity to
comment on the draft addendum.
Because the Barton Springs Salamander
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:31 Jul 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
Recovery Plan has already been through
peer and public review and because this
plan is a valid recovery plan, we seek
public comments on only the draft
addendum. We will summarize and
respond to the issues raised by the
public and post our responses on our
Web site. Substantive comments may or
may not result in changes to the draft
addendum; comments regarding
recovery plan implementation will be
forwarded as appropriate to Federal or
other entities so that they can be taken
into account during the course of
implementing recovery actions.
We invite written comments on the
draft addendum. In particular, we are
interested in additional information
regarding the appropriateness of the
draft recovery criteria and recovery
actions for the Austin blind salamander
as well as the costs associated with
implementing the recommended
recovery actions.
Before we approve a final addendum,
we will consider all comments we
receive by the date specified in DATES.
Methods of submitting comments are in
the ADDRESSES section.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Comments and materials we receive
will be available on our Web site
https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/
AustinTexas/, by appointment, for
public inspection during normal
business hours at our office (see
ADDRESSES).
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request from
the Austin Ecological Services Field
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section).
Authority
We developed this recovery plan
addendum under the authority of
section 4(f) of the Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
We publish this notice under section
4(f) Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 18, 2015.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–16595 Filed 7–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION
AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION
[RC0ZCUPCA0, 155R0680R1,
RR.17549897.2015101.02]
Notice of Availability of the Records of
Decision for the Provo River Delta
Restoration Project
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Water and Science,
Interior; Utah Reclamation Mitigation
and Conservation Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Interior and the Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation
Commission have prepared separate
Records of Decision (RODs) that
disclose their selection of Alternative B
for implementing the restoration of the
Provo River Delta as described in the
Provo River Delta Restoration Project
(PRDRP) Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS). Both agencies have
also selected to implement Option 2 for
the improvement of the existing Provo
River Channel. The size of Alternative B
may be increased by acquiring
additional land described under
Alternative A. However, such additional
land acquisition will only be
accomplished if the additional land can
be acquired on a willing-seller basis.
Therefore, a potentially enlarged
Alternative B (the Preferred Alternative)
and Option 2 are adopted as the
Selected Action. The implementation of
Alternative B as potentially modified
and Option 2 will significantly aid in
meeting recovery actions within the
approved June Sucker Recovery Plan of
1999.
DATES: The Department of the Interior
and the Utah Reclamation Mitigation
and Conservation Commission signed
separate RODs on May 26, 2015 and
subsequently made them available to
the public.
ADDRESSES: Send written
correspondence or requests for copies to
Mr. W. Russ Findlay, Department of the
Interior, Central Utah Project
Completion Act Office, 302 East 1860
South, Provo, Utah 846060–7317; or Mr.
Richard Mingo, Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation
Commission, 230 South 500 East Suite
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 7, 2015 / Notices
230, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102; or by
email to wfindlay@usbr.gov or rmingo@
usbr.gov. The RODs are accessible at the
following Web sites: www.cupcao.gov,
www.provoriverdelta.us,
www.mitigationcommission.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
locations where copies of the RODs are
available for public review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
W. Russ Findlay, 801–379–1084,
wfindlay@usbr.gov; or Mr. Richard
Mingo, 801–524–3146, rmingo@
usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Department of the Interior’s
Record of Decision for the Diamond
Fork System Final Supplement to the
Diamond Fork Power System Final
Environmental Impact Statement,
signed September 29, 1999, commits the
Department of the Interior, Utah
Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission, and the
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
to ‘‘. . . participate in the development
of a Recovery Implementation Program
for June sucker.’’ Moreover, ‘‘. . . [a]ny
future development of the Bonneville
Unit of CUP [Central Utah Project] will
be contingent on the RIP [June Sucker
Recovery Implementation Program
(JSRIP)] making ‘sufficient progress’
towards recovery of June sucker.’’ The
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission signed its
own Record of Decision for the
Diamond Fork System Project on
November 19, 1999. The JSRIP was
established in 2002, and the Joint Lead
Agencies are participants. The goals of
the JSRIP are twofold, to recover June
sucker so that it no longer requires
protection under the Endangered
Species Act and allow continued
operation of existing water facilities and
future development of water resources
for human uses within the Utah Lake
Basin in Utah.
The June sucker exists naturally only
in Utah Lake and spawns primarily in
the lower Provo River, a Utah Lake
tributary. Monitoring indicates young
June sucker hatching in the lower Provo
River do not survive to the adult stage
due to habitat inadequacies in the lower
Provo River and its interface with Utah
Lake related to flow, food supply, and
shelter. A compounding factor is likely
predation by nonnative fishes. Dredging
and channelization for flood control has
eliminated the shallow, warm, complex
wetland habitat at the mouth of the
Provo River where it enters Utah Lake.
20:31 Jul 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
The PRDRP will restore the lower
Provo River to a more natural deltaic
ecosystem. The delta and associated
habitat will provide needed habitat for
the recovery of the endangered June
sucker. These improvements will be
accomplished through the
implementation of Alternative B and
Option 2 as analyzed in the PRDRP FEIS
plus the option to increase the size of
Alternative B by acquiring additional
land described under Alternative A only
if the additional land can be acquired on
a willing-seller basis.
Purpose and Need for Action
Background
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The Federal Action
The PRDRP has been identified as an
essential action needed to recover the
endangered June sucker. It will restore
functional habitat conditions in the
lower Provo River and its interface with
Utah Lake that are needed for spawning,
hatching, larval transport, survival,
rearing and recruitment of young June
sucker into the population on a selfsustaining basis.
The purposes of the PRDRP are to:
• Implement the specific criteria of
the June Sucker Recovery Plan to restore
a naturally functioning Provo River
delta ecosystem essential for
recruitment of June sucker;
• provide recreational improvements
and opportunities associated with the
PRDRP; and
• adopt flow regime targets for the
lower Provo River and provide delivery
of supplemental water to the lower
Provo River, including additional
conserved water.
Alternative B—Provo River Delta
Restoration
Alternative B was developed with
substantial involvement from study area
landowners and other stakeholders. It is
the selected alternative for restoring the
Provo River Delta. It will reduce the
amount of private land required for the
PRDRP and preserve the highest-value
agricultural land, while still improving
June sucker spawning and rearing
habitat. The acquisition boundary for
this alternative encompasses 310.3
acres. As previously described in this
NOA, lands in addition to the minimum
required under Alternative B could be
acquired on a willing-seller basis, either
in conjunction with Alternative B or at
a later time. Implementing Alternative B
as described in the Final EIS would
result in splitting of three or more
contiguous land ownerships/
agricultural operations. It is possible
that landowners may request as
condition of sale of their property the
acquisition of some or all of the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
38731
remaining properties outside the
delineated Alternative B boundary.
Other landowners may also have
interest in selling their land to the
government for the project. Only if these
agreements can be achieved on a
willing-seller basis would they be
consummated. Such lands could be
acquired to enhance the habitat values
for June sucker, to preserve habitat
values for other wildlife or wetlands, or
to provide additional related
recreational opportunities.
Option 2—Provo River Existing
Channel Improvement
Option 2 will be implemented along
with Alternative B above. Option 2 will
maintain the existing channel at a
relatively constant elevation by
constructing a small dam at the
downstream mouth of the channel near
Utah Lake State Park. An aeration
system will be installed and operated as
necessary to improve water quality. A
minimum flow of 10 cubic feet per
second will be provided to the existing
Provo River channel which will be
retained and managed for recreational
and aesthetic purposes.
A Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for the PRDRP was published in the
Federal Register on February 28, 2014
(79 FR 11511). A Notice of Availability
of the PRDRP FEIS was published in the
Federal Register on April 8, 2015 (80 FR
18940).
Copies of the RODs are available for
public review at:
• Department of the Interior, Central
Utah Project Completion Act Office, 302
East 1860 South, Provo, Utah 84606–
7317
• Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission, 230 South
500 East Suite 230, Salt Lake City, Utah
84102
Dated: June 8, 2015.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Central Utah Project
Completion Act Office, Department of the
Interior.
Dated: June 8, 2015.
Mark Holden,
Executive Director, Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–16600 Filed 7–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38730-38731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION
[RC0ZCUPCA0, 155R0680R1, RR.17549897.2015101.02]
Notice of Availability of the Records of Decision for the Provo
River Delta Restoration Project
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Water and Science,
Interior; Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior and the Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission have prepared separate Records
of Decision (RODs) that disclose their selection of Alternative B for
implementing the restoration of the Provo River Delta as described in
the Provo River Delta Restoration Project (PRDRP) Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS). Both agencies have also selected to implement
Option 2 for the improvement of the existing Provo River Channel. The
size of Alternative B may be increased by acquiring additional land
described under Alternative A. However, such additional land
acquisition will only be accomplished if the additional land can be
acquired on a willing-seller basis. Therefore, a potentially enlarged
Alternative B (the Preferred Alternative) and Option 2 are adopted as
the Selected Action. The implementation of Alternative B as potentially
modified and Option 2 will significantly aid in meeting recovery
actions within the approved June Sucker Recovery Plan of 1999.
DATES: The Department of the Interior and the Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission signed separate RODs on May 26,
2015 and subsequently made them available to the public.
ADDRESSES: Send written correspondence or requests for copies to Mr. W.
Russ Findlay, Department of the Interior, Central Utah Project
Completion Act Office, 302 East 1860 South, Provo, Utah 846060-7317; or
Mr. Richard Mingo, Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation
Commission, 230 South 500 East Suite
[[Page 38731]]
230, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102; or by email to wfindlay@usbr.gov or
rmingo@usbr.gov. The RODs are accessible at the following Web sites:
www.cupcao.gov, www.provoriverdelta.us, www.mitigationcommission.gov.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for locations where copies of
the RODs are available for public review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. W. Russ Findlay, 801-379-1084,
wfindlay@usbr.gov; or Mr. Richard Mingo, 801-524-3146, rmingo@usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of the Interior's Record of Decision for the Diamond
Fork System Final Supplement to the Diamond Fork Power System Final
Environmental Impact Statement, signed September 29, 1999, commits the
Department of the Interior, Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission, and the Central Utah Water Conservancy
District to ``. . . participate in the development of a Recovery
Implementation Program for June sucker.'' Moreover, ``. . . [a]ny
future development of the Bonneville Unit of CUP [Central Utah Project]
will be contingent on the RIP [June Sucker Recovery Implementation
Program (JSRIP)] making `sufficient progress' towards recovery of June
sucker.'' The Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission
signed its own Record of Decision for the Diamond Fork System Project
on November 19, 1999. The JSRIP was established in 2002, and the Joint
Lead Agencies are participants. The goals of the JSRIP are twofold, to
recover June sucker so that it no longer requires protection under the
Endangered Species Act and allow continued operation of existing water
facilities and future development of water resources for human uses
within the Utah Lake Basin in Utah.
The June sucker exists naturally only in Utah Lake and spawns
primarily in the lower Provo River, a Utah Lake tributary. Monitoring
indicates young June sucker hatching in the lower Provo River do not
survive to the adult stage due to habitat inadequacies in the lower
Provo River and its interface with Utah Lake related to flow, food
supply, and shelter. A compounding factor is likely predation by
nonnative fishes. Dredging and channelization for flood control has
eliminated the shallow, warm, complex wetland habitat at the mouth of
the Provo River where it enters Utah Lake.
The Federal Action
The PRDRP will restore the lower Provo River to a more natural
deltaic ecosystem. The delta and associated habitat will provide needed
habitat for the recovery of the endangered June sucker. These
improvements will be accomplished through the implementation of
Alternative B and Option 2 as analyzed in the PRDRP FEIS plus the
option to increase the size of Alternative B by acquiring additional
land described under Alternative A only if the additional land can be
acquired on a willing-seller basis.
Purpose and Need for Action
The PRDRP has been identified as an essential action needed to
recover the endangered June sucker. It will restore functional habitat
conditions in the lower Provo River and its interface with Utah Lake
that are needed for spawning, hatching, larval transport, survival,
rearing and recruitment of young June sucker into the population on a
self-sustaining basis.
The purposes of the PRDRP are to:
Implement the specific criteria of the June Sucker
Recovery Plan to restore a naturally functioning Provo River delta
ecosystem essential for recruitment of June sucker;
provide recreational improvements and opportunities
associated with the PRDRP; and
adopt flow regime targets for the lower Provo River and
provide delivery of supplemental water to the lower Provo River,
including additional conserved water.
Alternative B--Provo River Delta Restoration
Alternative B was developed with substantial involvement from study
area landowners and other stakeholders. It is the selected alternative
for restoring the Provo River Delta. It will reduce the amount of
private land required for the PRDRP and preserve the highest-value
agricultural land, while still improving June sucker spawning and
rearing habitat. The acquisition boundary for this alternative
encompasses 310.3 acres. As previously described in this NOA, lands in
addition to the minimum required under Alternative B could be acquired
on a willing-seller basis, either in conjunction with Alternative B or
at a later time. Implementing Alternative B as described in the Final
EIS would result in splitting of three or more contiguous land
ownerships/agricultural operations. It is possible that landowners may
request as condition of sale of their property the acquisition of some
or all of the remaining properties outside the delineated Alternative B
boundary. Other landowners may also have interest in selling their land
to the government for the project. Only if these agreements can be
achieved on a willing-seller basis would they be consummated. Such
lands could be acquired to enhance the habitat values for June sucker,
to preserve habitat values for other wildlife or wetlands, or to
provide additional related recreational opportunities.
Option 2--Provo River Existing Channel Improvement
Option 2 will be implemented along with Alternative B above. Option
2 will maintain the existing channel at a relatively constant elevation
by constructing a small dam at the downstream mouth of the channel near
Utah Lake State Park. An aeration system will be installed and operated
as necessary to improve water quality. A minimum flow of 10 cubic feet
per second will be provided to the existing Provo River channel which
will be retained and managed for recreational and aesthetic purposes.
A Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for the PRDRP was published in the Federal Register on
February 28, 2014 (79 FR 11511). A Notice of Availability of the PRDRP
FEIS was published in the Federal Register on April 8, 2015 (80 FR
18940).
Copies of the RODs are available for public review at:
Department of the Interior, Central Utah Project
Completion Act Office, 302 East 1860 South, Provo, Utah 84606-7317
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission,
230 South 500 East Suite 230, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Dated: June 8, 2015.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Central Utah Project Completion Act Office,
Department of the Interior.
Dated: June 8, 2015.
Mark Holden,
Executive Director, Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-16600 Filed 7-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P