Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Assumption of Concurrent Federal Criminal Jurisdiction In Certain Areas of Indian Country, 38745-38746 [2015-16554]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 7, 2015 / Notices matters contained in this Final Judgment; and (2) to interview, either informally or on the record, Settling Defendants’ officers, directors, employees, or agents, who may have individual counsel present, regarding such matters. The interviews shall be subject to the reasonable convenience of the interviewee and without restraint or interference by Settling Defendants. (B) Upon the written request of an authorized representative of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division or of the Office of the Michigan Attorney General, Settling Defendants shall, subject to any legally recognized privilege, submit written reports or response to written interrogatories, under oath if requested, relating to any of the matters contained in this Final Judgment as may be requested. (C) No information or documents obtained by the means provided in this section shall be divulged by the United States or the State of Michigan to any person other than an authorized representative of the executive branch of the United States or the State of Michigan, except in the course of legal proceedings to which the United States or the State of Michigan is a party (including grand jury proceedings), or for the purpose of securing compliance with this Final Judgment, or as otherwise required by law. (D) If at the time information or documents are furnished by Settling Defendants to the United States or the State of Michigan, Settling Defendants represent and identify in writing the material in any such information or documents to which a claim of protection may be asserted under Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Settling Defendants mark each pertinent page of such material, ‘‘Subject to claim of protection under Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States and the State of Michigan shall give Settling Defendants ten calendar days notice prior to divulging such material in any legal proceeding (other than a grand jury proceeding). VIII. INVESTIGATION FEES AND COSTS Each Settling Defendant shall pay to the State of Michigan the sum of $5,000.00 to partially cover the attorney fees and costs of investigation. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES IX. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION This Court retains jurisdiction to enable any party to this Final Judgment to apply to this Court at any time for further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out or construe this Final Judgment, to modify any of its provisions, to enforce compliance, and to punish violations of its provisions. X. EXPIRATION OF FINAL JUDGMENT Unless this Court grants an extension, this Final Judgment shall expire five years from the date of its entry. XI. NOTICE For purposes of this Final Judgment, any notice or other communication required to be filed with or provided to the United States or the State of Michigan shall be sent to the persons at the addresses set forth below (or VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Jul 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 38745 such other address as the United States or the State of Michigan may specify in writing to any Settling Defendant): Chief Litigation I Section U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 450 Fifth Street, Suite 4100 Washington, DC 20530 it affects your activities, please contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, [Settling Defendant’s Antitrust Compliance Officer] Division Chief Corporate Oversight Division Michigan Department of Attorney General 525 West Ottawa Street P.O. Box 30755 Lansing, MI 48909 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE XII. PUBLIC INTEREST DETERMINATION The parties, as required, have complied with the procedures of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies available to the public of this Final Judgment, the Competitive Impact Statement, and any comments thereon, and the United States’ responses to comments. Based upon the record before the Court, which includes the Competitive Impact Statement and any comments and response to comments filed with the Court, entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. Dated: llllllllll Court approval subject to procedures of Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16 United States District Judge Exhibit 1 [Letterhead of Settling Defendant] [Name and Address of Antitrust Compliance Officer] Dear [XX]: I am providing you this notice to make sure you are aware of a court order recently entered by a federal judge in lllll, Michigan. This court order applies to our institution and all of its employees, including you, so it is important that you understand the obligations it imposes on us. [CEO Name] has asked me to let each of you know that s/he expects you to take these obligations seriously and abide by them. In a nutshell, the order prohibits us from agreeing with other healthcare providers, including hospitals and physicians, to limit marketing or to divide any geographic market or territory between healthcare providers. This means you cannot give any assurance to another healthcare provider that [Settling Defendant] will refrain from marketing our services, and you cannot ask for any assurance from them that they will refrain from marketing. The court order also prohibits communicating with [list other three defendants], or their employees about our marketing plans or about their marketing plans. There are limited exceptions to this restriction on communications, such as discussing joint projects, but you should check with me before relying on those exceptions. A copy of the court order is attached. Please read it carefully and familiarize yourself with its terms. The order, rather than the above description, is controlling. If you have any questions about the order or how PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2015–16585 Filed 7–6–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P [OMB Number 1105–0091] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Assumption of Concurrent Federal Criminal Jurisdiction In Certain Areas of Indian Country Office of Tribal Justice, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice, Office of Tribal Justice, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the FR 80 23287, on April 27, 2015, allowing for a 60 day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 30 days until August 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Mr. Tracy Toulou, Director, Office of Tribal Justice, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 2310, Washington, DC 20530. Written comments and/or suggestions can also be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or sent to OIRA_ submissions@omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 38746 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 7, 2015 / Notices for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and/or —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection: 1. Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Request to the Attorney General for Assumption of Concurrent Federal Criminal Jurisdiction. 3. The agency form number: N/A 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Tribal governments. Other: None. Abstract: The Department of Justice published a rule to establish the procedures for an Indian tribe whose Indian country is subject to State criminal jurisdiction under Public Law 280 (18 U.S.C. 1162(a)) to request that the United States accept concurrent criminal jurisdiction within the tribe’s Indian country, and for the Attorney General to decide whether to consent to such a request. The purpose of the collection is to provide information from the requesting tribe sufficient for the Attorney General to make a decision whether to consent to the request. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that there are fewer than 350 respondents; the response should take an average of 80 hours to complete and submit. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 28,000 annual total burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Jul 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: June 30, 2015. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2015–16554 Filed 7–6–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–A5–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [Docket No. ODAG 155] Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Meeting Department of Justice. Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: This notice announces a forthcoming public meeting of the National Commission on Forensic Science. SUMMARY: The meeting will be held on August 10, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and August 11, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Online registration for the meeting must be completed on or before 5:00 p.m. (EST) August 3, 2015. Electronic comments on any draft work products will be accepted through the electronic Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at www.regulations.gov for a thirty day public comment period. ADDRESSES: House of Sweden: 2900 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Bruck, Senior Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General and Designated Federal Official, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530, by email at Andrew.J.Bruck@ usdoj.gov by phone at (202) 305–3481. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda: On August 10, the Commission will receive an overview of ethics issues in their roles as Special Government Employees. The Commission will receive a briefing on issues related to proficiency testing and receive status reports from the Subcommittees on Bylaws and Accreditation and Proficiency Testing. The public comment period will begin at 5:00 p.m. On August 11, the Commission will receive status reports from the Subcommittees on Scientific Inquiry and Research, Interim Solutions, Human Factors, Reporting and Testimony, Medicolegal Death Investigation, and Training on Science and Law. The Commission will also receive a briefing from a representative from the Netherlands Register of Court Experts. Note: Agenda items, including designation of presentation dates are DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 subject to change. A final agenda will be posted to the Commission’s Web site in advance of the meeting. Procedures: Meeting materials, including work products, will be made available on the Commission’s Web site: https://www.justice.gov/ncfs. The meeting will be webcast at: https:// stream.sparkstreetdigital.com/playerce.html?id=doj-aug10. The meeting will also be open to the public. Seating in the meeting room is limited and will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. All persons who are interested in being on-site for the meeting must register on-line by clicking the registration link found at: https:// www.justice.gov/ncfs/meetings#s7. Members of the public may present oral comments on issues pending before the Commission. Those individuals interested in making oral comments should indicate their intent through the on-line registration form and time will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. Time allotted for an individual’s comment period will be limited to no more than 3 minutes. If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the scheduled public comment periods, written comments can be submitted through www.regulations.gov in lieu of oral comments. Posting of Public Comments: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket No. ODAG 155’’ on all electronic and written correspondence. The Department encourages all comments on subcommittee work products be submitted electronically through www.regulations.gov using the electronic comment form provided on that site. Paper comments that duplicate the electronic submission are not necessary as all comments submitted to www.regulations.gov will be posted for public review and are part of the official docket record. In accordance with the Federal Records Act, please note that all comments received are considered part of the public record, and shall be made available for public inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. The comments to be posted may include personally identifiable information (such as your name, address, etc.) and confidential business information voluntarily submitted by the commenter. You are not required to submit personal identifying information in order to comment on this meeting. Nevertheless, if you want to submit personally identifiable information (such as your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38745-38746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[OMB Number 1105-0091]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection 
eComments Requested; Assumption of Concurrent Federal Criminal 
Jurisdiction In Certain Areas of Indian Country

AGENCY: Office of Tribal Justice, Department of Justice.

ACTION: 30-day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice, Office of Tribal Justice, will be 
submitting the following information collection request to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance 
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information 
collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected 
agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published 
in the FR 80 23287, on April 27, 2015, allowing for a 60 day comment 
period.

DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 
30 days until August 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments 
especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, 
suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection 
instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact 
Mr. Tracy Toulou, Director, Office of Tribal Justice, Department of 
Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 2310, Washington, DC 20530. 
Written comments and/or suggestions can also be directed to the Office 
of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or 
sent to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the 
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of 
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of 
the following four points:

--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary

[[Page 38746]]

for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and/or
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.
    Overview of this information collection:
    1. Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently 
approved collection.
    2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Request to the Attorney 
General for Assumption of Concurrent Federal Criminal Jurisdiction.
    3. The agency form number: N/A
    4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as 
well as a brief abstract:
    Primary: Tribal governments.
    Other: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Justice published a rule to establish 
the procedures for an Indian tribe whose Indian country is subject to 
State criminal jurisdiction under Public Law 280 (18 U.S.C. 1162(a)) to 
request that the United States accept concurrent criminal jurisdiction 
within the tribe's Indian country, and for the Attorney General to 
decide whether to consent to such a request. The purpose of the 
collection is to provide information from the requesting tribe 
sufficient for the Attorney General to make a decision whether to 
consent to the request.
    5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of 
time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated 
that there are fewer than 350 respondents; the response should take an 
average of 80 hours to complete and submit.
    6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection: There are an estimated 28,000 annual total burden 
hours associated with this collection.
    If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, 
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, 
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two 
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.

    Dated: June 30, 2015.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015-16554 Filed 7-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-A5-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.