Migratory Bird Permits; Update of Falconry Permitting Reporting Address, 38013-38015 [2015-16371]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
§ 76.906 Presumption of effective
competition.
§ 76.907 Petition for a determination of
effective competition.
lack of effective competition is not
otherwise available, franchising
authorities may request from a
multichannel video programming
distributor information regarding the
multichannel video programming
distributor’s reach and number of
subscribers. A multichannel video
programming distributor must respond
to such request within 15 days. Such
responses may be limited to numerical
totals.
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–15806 Filed 7–1–15; 8:45 am]
In the absence of a demonstration to
the contrary cable systems are
presumed: (a) To be subject to effective
competition pursuant to section
76.905(b)(2); and (b) Not to be subject to
effective competition pursuant to
section 76.905(b)(1), (3) or (4).
■ 3. Amend § 76.907 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(b) If the cable operator seeks to
demonstrate that effective competition
as defined in § 76.905(b)(1), (3), or (4)
exists in the franchise area, it bears the
burden of demonstrating the presence of
such effective competition. Effective
competition as defined in § 76.905(b)(2)
is governed by the presumption in
§ 76.906, except that where a
franchising authority has rebutted the
presumption of competing provider
effective competition as defined in
§ 76.905(b)(2) and is certified, the cable
operator must demonstrate that
circumstances have changed and
effective competition is present in the
franchise area.
Note to paragraph (b): The criteria for
determining effective competition
pursuant to § 76.905(b)(4) are described
in Implementation of Cable Act Reform
Provisions of the Telecommunications
Act of 1996, Report and Order in CS
Docket No. 96–85, FCC 99–57 (released
March 29, 1999).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 76.910 by revising
paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
§ 76.910 Franchising authority
certification.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) The cable system in question is not
subject to effective competition. The
franchising authority must submit
specific evidence demonstrating its
rebuttal of the presumption in § 76.906
that the cable operator is subject to
effective competition pursuant to
section 76.905(b)(2). Unless a
franchising authority has actual
knowledge to the contrary, the
franchising authority may rely on the
presumption in § 76.906 that the cable
operator is not subject to effective
competition pursuant to section
76.905(b)(1), (3), or (4). The franchising
authority bears the burden of submitting
evidence rebutting the presumption that
competing provider effective
competition, as defined in
§ 76.905(b)(2), exists in the franchise
area. If the evidence establishing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:22 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
38013
required information in our electronic
database at https://permits.fws.gov/186A;
and (2) by hard copy, by submitting a
paper form 3–186A to the falconer’s
State, tribal, or territorial agency that
governs falconry. The State of California
has developed and implemented an
online permitting and reporting system
that is compatible with the system we
use for reporting take of raptors from the
wild for falconry (our electronic
database at https://permits.fws.gov/
186A). Allowing California residents to
use that State’s reporting system should
result in a small savings of resources for
both the State and the Service.
Therefore, with this rule, we change the
web address for falconers in California
to report takes, acquisitions, transfers,
and losses of falconry birds.
Administrative Procedure
50 CFR Part 21
The State of California has
implemented an online permitting and
reporting system compatible with the
system that we, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), use for
reporting take of raptors from the wild
for falconry. We change the Web
address for falconers in California to
report takes, acquisitions, transfers, and
losses of falconry birds.
DATES: This rule is effective January 1,
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Kokel at 703–358–1967.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This action is administrative in
nature. We are providing regulated
entities and the general public with an
accurate web address to report take,
loss, or transfers of raptors by falconers
in California. We delegated the State of
California permitting authority for
falconry under the regulations at 50 CFR
21.29 (see 78 FR 72830, December 4,
2013). This rule facilitates that State’s
permitting and reporting requirements,
and will enable reporting with our
system for reporting take, acquisition,
loss, or transfer of any bird for falconry.
The change should slightly reduce
administration costs for both the State
and the Service. The delegation of
permitting authority to the State of
California has already been subject to
public notice-and-comment procedures,
and this change simply adds an Internet
address to the regulations at 50 CFR
21.29 to allow full use of California’s
permitting and reporting system. Under
5 U.S.C. 553(b), rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice may
be made final without previous notice to
the public. This is a final rule.
Background
Required Determinations
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2015–0032;
FF09M21200–156–FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018–BA90
Migratory Bird Permits; Update of
Falconry Permitting Reporting Address
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
We published a final rule in the
Federal Register on October 8, 2008 (73
FR 59448), to revise our regulations
governing falconry in the United States,
found in title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at § 21.29. In 2013,
we added the State of California to the
list of States to which we delegate
permitting for falconry to the State, as
provided under the regulations (78 FR
72830, December 4, 2013).
This Rule
In the falconry regulations at 50 CFR
21.29, we offer two methods to submit
required reports or other information:
(1) Electronically, by entering the
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Management and Budget’s
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. OIRA has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Executive Order (E.O.) 13563
reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
38014
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that
regulations must be based on the best
available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996 (Pub. L.
104–121), whenever an agency is
required to publish a notice of
rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (that
is, small businesses, small
organizations, and small government
jurisdictions). However, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required if the
head of an agency certifies the rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide the statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
We have examined this rule’s
potential effects on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, and have determined that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule
simplifies reporting required by 50 CFR
21.29 for residents of California. This
rule does not change falconers’ costs for
practicing their sport, nor does it affect
businesses that provide equipment or
supplies for falconry. This rule may
result in a small savings of time and
other resources by the State of California
and by the Service, but neither of these
is a small entity. Consequently, we
certify that, because this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required.
This rule is not a major rule under the
SBREFA (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). It will not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:22 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
a. This rule does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. There are no costs to
permittees or any other part of the
economy associated with this change to
the regulations.
b. This rule will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. This
rule simplifies reporting required by 50
CFR 21.29 for residents of California.
c. This rule will not have significant
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and it does not
contain any new collections of
information that require Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. OMB has approved the
information collection requirements of
the Migratory Bird Permits Program and
assigned OMB control number 1018–
0022, which expires May 31, 2017.
Information from the collection is used
to document take of raptors from the
wild for use in falconry and to
document transfers of raptors held for
falconry between permittees. A Federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We evaluated the environmental
impacts of the changes to the
regulations, and determined that this
rule does not have any environmental
impacts.
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.), we have determined the following:
a. This rule will not ‘‘significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments in a
negative way. A small government
agency plan is not required. The State
of California requested that we make
this change to the regulations to simply
falconry reporting for that State’s
residents.
b. This rule will not produce a
Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year. It is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, the
rule does not have significant takings
implications. A takings implication
assessment is not required. This rule
does not contain a provision for taking
of private property.
Federalism
This rule does not have sufficient
Federalism effects to warrant
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement under E.O. 13132. The
State of California requested that we
make this change to the regulations to
simplify falconry reporting for that
State’s residents.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Office of the Solicitor has determined
that the rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined this rule under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
National Environmental Policy Act
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), Executive
Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
evaluated potential effects on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes and have
determined that this rule will not
interfere with Tribes’ ability to manage
themselves or their funds or to regulate
falconry on Tribal lands.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
E.O. 13211 requires agencies to
prepare Statements of Energy Effects
when undertaking certain actions. This
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under E.O. 12866, and will not
significantly affect energy supplies,
distribution, or use. Therefore, this
action is not a significant energy action
and no Statement of Energy Effects is
required.
Environmental Consequences of the
Action
Socioeconomic. This action will not
have discernible socioeconomic
impacts.
Raptor populations. This rule will not
change the effects of falconry on raptor
populations. We are simply adding to
our regulations at 50 CFR 21.29 a
falconry reporting method for residents
of California.
Endangered and threatened species.
This rule does not change protections
for endangered and threatened species.
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Compliance With Endangered Species
Act Requirements
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that ‘‘The
Secretary [of the Interior] shall review
other programs administered by him
and utilize such programs in
furtherance of the purposes of this
chapter’’ (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(1)). It
further states that the Secretary must
‘‘insure that any action authorized,
funded, or carried out . . . is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of
any endangered species or threatened
species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of [critical]
habitat’’ (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2)). This rule
will not affect threatened or endangered
species or their habitats in the United
States.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 21
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation, Wildlife.
Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, we amend subpart C of part
21, subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of
the Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 21—MIGRATORY BIRD PERMITS
1. The authority citation for part 21
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–12.
2. Amend § 21.29 by:
a. Revising paragraph (b)(2);
b. Revising the fifth sentence of
paragraph (c)(6)(i);
■ c. Revising the third sentence of
paragraph (c)(6)(ii);
■ d. Revising the second sentence of
paragraph (c)(6)(iii)(A);
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(6)(iii)(B);
■ f. Revising the first sentence of
paragraph (e)(2)(iv);
■ g. Revising the second sentence of
paragraph (e)(5)(i);
■ h. Revising paragraph (e)(6)(i);
■ i. Revising paragraph (e)(7)(i);
■ j. Revising the third sentence of
paragraph (e)(9)(ii);
■ k. Revising the second sentence of
paragraph (e)(9)(iii); and
■ l. Revising the second sentence after
the heading of paragraph (f)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER
■
■
■
§ 21.29 Falconry standards and falconry
permitting.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Reporting. (i) The State, tribe, or
territory must work with us to ensure
that the electronic 3–186A reporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:22 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
system (https://permits.fws.gov/186A) for
reporting take, transfers, and loss of
falconry birds is fully operational for
residents of that jurisdiction.
(ii) If you are required to submit a
report or other information under this
section, you must either enter the
required information in the electronic
database at https://permits.fws.gov/186A,
or at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/
FalconryReporting if you are a resident
of California, or submit a paper form 3–
186A to your State, tribal, or territorial
agency that governs falconry.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * * Within 10 days from the day
on which you take the raptor from the
wild, you must report take of the bird
by submitting the required information
(including the band number) using one
of the methods listed in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section. * * *
(ii) * * * You must submit the
required information using one of the
methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of
this section. * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) * * * You must submit the
required information within 10 days of
rebanding the raptor using one of the
methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of
this section.
(B) Purchase and implant an ISOcompliant (134.2 kHz) microchip in the
bird and report the microchip
information using one of the methods
listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) If you are responsible for
reporting take of a raptor from the wild,
use one of the methods listed in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) * * * You must report take of the
bird using one of the methods listed in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section at
your first opportunity to do so, but no
more than 10 days after capture of the
bird. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(i) If you acquire a raptor; transfer,
reband, or microchip a raptor; if a raptor
you possess is stolen; if you lose a
raptor to the wild and you do not
recover it within 30 days; or if a bird
you possess for falconry dies; you must
report the change within 10 days using
one of the methods listed in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38015
(7) * * *
(i) If you acquire a bird from a
rehabilitator, within 10 days of the
transaction you must report it using one
of the methods listed in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) * * *
(ii) * * * You must remove its
falconry band (if it has one) and report
release of the bird by submitting the
required information using one of the
methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of
this section.
(iii) * * * You must remove its
falconry band and report release of the
bird by submitting the required
information using one of the methods
listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(6) * * * Within 10 days, you must
report the transfer by submitting the
required information using one of the
methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Michael J. Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2015–16371 Filed 7–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 0907271173–0629–03]
RIN 0648–XE014
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic; 2015 Recreational
Accountability Measures and Closure
for South Atlantic Snowy Grouper
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS implements
accountability measures (AMs) for the
recreational sector for snowy grouper in
the South Atlantic for the 2015 fishing
year through this temporary rule.
Average recreational landings from
2012–2014 exceeded the recreational
annual catch limit (ACL) for snowy
grouper. To account for this overage,
this rule reduces the length of the 2015
recreational fishing season. Therefore,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38013-38015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16371]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2015-0032; FF09M21200-156-FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018-BA90
Migratory Bird Permits; Update of Falconry Permitting Reporting
Address
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of California has implemented an online permitting
and reporting system compatible with the system that we, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (Service), use for reporting take of raptors from
the wild for falconry. We change the Web address for falconers in
California to report takes, acquisitions, transfers, and losses of
falconry birds.
DATES: This rule is effective January 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Kokel at 703-358-1967.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We published a final rule in the Federal Register on October 8,
2008 (73 FR 59448), to revise our regulations governing falconry in the
United States, found in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) at Sec. 21.29. In 2013, we added the State of California to the
list of States to which we delegate permitting for falconry to the
State, as provided under the regulations (78 FR 72830, December 4,
2013).
This Rule
In the falconry regulations at 50 CFR 21.29, we offer two methods
to submit required reports or other information: (1) Electronically, by
entering the required information in our electronic database at https://permits.fws.gov/186A; and (2) by hard copy, by submitting a paper form
3-186A to the falconer's State, tribal, or territorial agency that
governs falconry. The State of California has developed and implemented
an online permitting and reporting system that is compatible with the
system we use for reporting take of raptors from the wild for falconry
(our electronic database at https://permits.fws.gov/186A). Allowing
California residents to use that State's reporting system should result
in a small savings of resources for both the State and the Service.
Therefore, with this rule, we change the web address for falconers in
California to report takes, acquisitions, transfers, and losses of
falconry birds.
Administrative Procedure
This action is administrative in nature. We are providing regulated
entities and the general public with an accurate web address to report
take, loss, or transfers of raptors by falconers in California. We
delegated the State of California permitting authority for falconry
under the regulations at 50 CFR 21.29 (see 78 FR 72830, December 4,
2013). This rule facilitates that State's permitting and reporting
requirements, and will enable reporting with our system for reporting
take, acquisition, loss, or transfer of any bird for falconry. The
change should slightly reduce administration costs for both the State
and the Service. The delegation of permitting authority to the State of
California has already been subject to public notice-and-comment
procedures, and this change simply adds an Internet address to the
regulations at 50 CFR 21.29 to allow full use of California's
permitting and reporting system. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice may be made final without previous
notice to the public. This is a final rule.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Management and
Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not
significant.
Executive Order (E.O.) 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866
while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to
promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The
[[Page 38014]]
executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the
public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent
with regulatory objectives.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the
best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), whenever an agency is required to
publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (that
is, small businesses, small organizations, and small government
jurisdictions). However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required
if the head of an agency certifies the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide the statement of the factual basis for certifying
that a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
We have examined this rule's potential effects on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and have determined that
this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule simplifies reporting
required by 50 CFR 21.29 for residents of California. This rule does
not change falconers' costs for practicing their sport, nor does it
affect businesses that provide equipment or supplies for falconry. This
rule may result in a small savings of time and other resources by the
State of California and by the Service, but neither of these is a small
entity. Consequently, we certify that, because this rule will not have
a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
This rule is not a major rule under the SBREFA (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
It will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
a. This rule does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. There are no costs to permittees or any other part of
the economy associated with this change to the regulations.
b. This rule will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. This rule simplifies reporting
required by 50 CFR 21.29 for residents of California.
c. This rule will not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.), we have determined the following:
a. This rule will not ``significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments in a negative way. A small government agency plan is not
required. The State of California requested that we make this change to
the regulations to simply falconry reporting for that State's
residents.
b. This rule will not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year. It is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.
This rule does not contain a provision for taking of private property.
Federalism
This rule does not have sufficient Federalism effects to warrant
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement under E.O. 13132.
The State of California requested that we make this change to the
regulations to simplify falconry reporting for that State's residents.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that the rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined this rule under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and it does not contain any new collections of
information that require Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. OMB has approved the information collection requirements of
the Migratory Bird Permits Program and assigned OMB control number
1018-0022, which expires May 31, 2017. Information from the collection
is used to document take of raptors from the wild for use in falconry
and to document transfers of raptors held for falconry between
permittees. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is
not required to respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
We evaluated the environmental impacts of the changes to the
regulations, and determined that this rule does not have any
environmental impacts.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), Executive Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we
have evaluated potential effects on Federally recognized Indian Tribes
and have determined that this rule will not interfere with Tribes'
ability to manage themselves or their funds or to regulate falconry on
Tribal lands.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy
Effects when undertaking certain actions. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, and will not
significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy action and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Environmental Consequences of the Action
Socioeconomic. This action will not have discernible socioeconomic
impacts.
Raptor populations. This rule will not change the effects of
falconry on raptor populations. We are simply adding to our regulations
at 50 CFR 21.29 a falconry reporting method for residents of
California.
Endangered and threatened species. This rule does not change
protections for endangered and threatened species.
[[Page 38015]]
Compliance With Endangered Species Act Requirements
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that ``The Secretary [of the
Interior] shall review other programs administered by him and utilize
such programs in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter'' (16
U.S.C. 1536(a)(1)). It further states that the Secretary must ``insure
that any action authorized, funded, or carried out . . . is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat'' (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2)). This rule will not
affect threatened or endangered species or their habitats in the United
States.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 21
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons stated in the preamble, we amend subpart C of part
21, subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 21--MIGRATORY BIRD PERMITS
0
1. The authority citation for part 21 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-12.
0
2. Amend Sec. 21.29 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(2);
0
b. Revising the fifth sentence of paragraph (c)(6)(i);
0
c. Revising the third sentence of paragraph (c)(6)(ii);
0
d. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (c)(6)(iii)(A);
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(6)(iii)(B);
0
f. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (e)(2)(iv);
0
g. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (e)(5)(i);
0
h. Revising paragraph (e)(6)(i);
0
i. Revising paragraph (e)(7)(i);
0
j. Revising the third sentence of paragraph (e)(9)(ii);
0
k. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (e)(9)(iii); and
0
l. Revising the second sentence after the heading of paragraph (f)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 21.29 Falconry standards and falconry permitting.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Reporting. (i) The State, tribe, or territory must work with us
to ensure that the electronic 3-186A reporting system (https://permits.fws.gov/186A) for reporting take, transfers, and loss of
falconry birds is fully operational for residents of that jurisdiction.
(ii) If you are required to submit a report or other information
under this section, you must either enter the required information in
the electronic database at https://permits.fws.gov/186A, or at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/FalconryReporting if you are a resident of
California, or submit a paper form 3-186A to your State, tribal, or
territorial agency that governs falconry.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * * Within 10 days from the day on which you take the raptor
from the wild, you must report take of the bird by submitting the
required information (including the band number) using one of the
methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section. * * *
(ii) * * * You must submit the required information using one of
the methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section. * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) * * * You must submit the required information within 10 days
of rebanding the raptor using one of the methods listed in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section.
(B) Purchase and implant an ISO-compliant (134.2 kHz) microchip in
the bird and report the microchip information using one of the methods
listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) If you are responsible for reporting take of a raptor from the
wild, use one of the methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section. * * *
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) * * * You must report take of the bird using one of the methods
listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section at your first
opportunity to do so, but no more than 10 days after capture of the
bird. * * *
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(i) If you acquire a raptor; transfer, reband, or microchip a
raptor; if a raptor you possess is stolen; if you lose a raptor to the
wild and you do not recover it within 30 days; or if a bird you possess
for falconry dies; you must report the change within 10 days using one
of the methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(i) If you acquire a bird from a rehabilitator, within 10 days of
the transaction you must report it using one of the methods listed in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(9) * * *
(ii) * * * You must remove its falconry band (if it has one) and
report release of the bird by submitting the required information using
one of the methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
(iii) * * * You must remove its falconry band and report release of
the bird by submitting the required information using one of the
methods listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(6) * * * Within 10 days, you must report the transfer by
submitting the required information using one of the methods listed in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Michael J. Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2015-16371 Filed 7-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P