Unapproved and Misbranded Otic Prescription Drug Products; Enforcement Action Dates, 38212-38216 [2015-16360]
Download as PDF
38212
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Notices
total of 1,020 inquiries (1,020 ÷ 217 =
4.7). Information submitted with each
inquiry varies widely in content,
depending on the complexity of the
request. Inquiries that are defined as
controlled correspondence (i.e.,
inquiries that request information on a
specific element of generic drug product
development) may range from a simple
inquiry on generic drug labeling to a
more complex inquiry for a formulation
assessment for a specific proposed
generic drug product. As a result, these
inquiries can vary between 1 to 10
burden hours, respectively.
Because the content of inquiries
considered controlled correspondence is
widely varied, we are providing an
average burden hour for each inquiry.
We estimate that it will take an average
of 5 hours per inquiry for industry to
gather necessary information, prepare
the request, and submit the request to
FDA. As a result, we estimate that it will
take an average of 5,100 total hours
annually for industry to prepare and
submit inquiries considered controlled
correspondence.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents are human generic drug
manufacturers and related industry.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Submission of controlled correspondence
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
Manufacturers, Related Industry, and Representatives ......
217
4.7
1,020
5
5,100
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
References
1. ‘‘Generic Drug User Fee Act Program
Performance Goals and Procedures’’
(GDUFA Commitment Letter) for
fiscal years 2013 through 2017,
available at https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/
GenericDrugUserFees/
UCM282505.pdf).
2. Id. at p. 15. The Web page quoted in
the controlled correspondence
definition has been updated as the
link provided in the GDUFA
Commitment Letter is no longer
accessible.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–16358 Filed 7–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–2008]
Unapproved and Misbranded Otic
Prescription Drug Products;
Enforcement Action Dates
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing its intention to take
enforcement action against unapproved
and misbranded otic drug products
labeled for prescription use and
containing benzocaine; benzocaine and
antipyrine; benzocaine, antipyrine, and
zinc acetate; benzocaine, chloroxylenol,
and hydrocortisone; chloroxylenol and
pramoxine; or chloroxylenol,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
pramoxine, and hydrocortisone; and
against persons who manufacture or
cause the manufacture or distribution of
such products in interstate commerce.
These unapproved and misbranded
prescription drug products are marketed
without evidence of safety and
effectiveness; may present safety
concerns; and pose a direct challenge to
the new drug approval system and, in
some cases, the over-the-counter (OTC)
drug monograph system.
DATES: This notice is effective July 2,
2015. For information about
enforcement dates, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, section IV.
ADDRESSES: For all communications in
response to this notice, identify with
Docket No. FDA–2015–N–2008 and
direct to the appropriate office listed in
this ADDRESSES section as follows:
Applications under section 505(b) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(b)):
Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and
Addiction Products (for drug products
with analgesic and anti-inflammatory
indications), or Division of AntiInfective Drug Products (for drug
products with anti-infective
indications), Office of New Drugs,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 22, Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002.
Applications under section 505(j) of
the FD&C Act: Office of Generic Drugs,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 75, Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002.
All other communications about this
action should be directed to: Kathleen
Joyce, Division of Prescription Drugs,
Office of Unapproved Drugs and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Labeling Compliance, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 5236,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; 301–
796–3329 or email: Kathleen.Joyce@
fda.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Joyce, Division of Prescription
Drugs, Office of Unapproved Drugs and
Labeling Compliance, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5236,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; 301–
796–3329 or email: Kathleen.Joyce@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing its intention to
take enforcement action against certain
unapproved and misbranded otic drug
products labeled for prescription use.
These marketed unapproved and
misbranded otic drug products are
labeled for, among other things, the
temporary relief of pain associated with
ear infections or inflammation,
including acute otitis media (middle ear
infection), otitis media with effusion
(fluid in the ear, but without infection),
and acute otitis externa (infection in the
outer ear or ‘‘swimmer’s ear’’). Other
indications for these unapproved drug
products include anti-infective and antiinflammatory claims, as well as claims
for the removal of cerumen (earwax).
This notice covers the following
marketed unapproved prescription otic
drug products: (1) Single-ingredient otic
drug products containing benzocaine;
(2) fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing benzocaine and
antipyrine; (3) fixed-dose combination
otic drug products containing
benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Notices
acetate; (4) fixed-dose combination otic
drug products containing benzocaine,
chloroxylenol, and hydrocortisone; (5)
fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing chloroxylenol and
pramoxine; and (6) fixed-dose
combination otic drug products
containing chloroxylenol, pramoxine,
and hydrocortisone. These drug
products are marketed without evidence
of safety and effectiveness, present
safety concerns, and pose a direct
challenge to the new drug approval
system and, in some cases, the OTC
drug monograph system.
For example, FDA is aware of many
unapproved and misbranded
prescription fixed-dose combination
drug products containing benzocaine
and antipyrine that are labeled for use
for the prompt relief of pain and
reduction of inflammation in the
congestive and serous stages of acute
otitis media and for adjuvant therapy
during systemic antibiotic
administration for resolution of acute
otitis media. These products have also
been labeled to facilitate the removal of
excessive or impacted cerumen. FDA
has received at least five adverse event
reports of allergic reactions to these
drug products, including angioedema of
the ear, eye, face, neck, and/or mouth.
We are also aware of at least one case
of methemoglobinemia associated with
the administration of an otic product
containing benzocaine in an infant,
which resulted in death (Ref. 1).
Methemoglobinemia is a serious blood
disorder in which an abnormal amount
of methemoglobin (a form of
hemoglobin) is produced (Ref. 2). Other
less serious adverse reactions associated
with these products include contact
hypersensitivity, pruritus, stinging,
burning, and irritation.
FDA is also aware of at least one
unapproved and misbranded
prescription single-ingredient otic drug
product containing benzocaine that is
labeled for use as a topical anesthetic in
the external auditory canal to relieve ear
pain, and for the treatment of acute
otitis media, acute swimmer’s ear, and
other forms of otitis externa. Potential
adverse reactions include
methemoglobinemia, local burning,
stinging, tenderness or edema, and
hypersensitivity reactions.
FDA is aware of an unapproved and
misbranded prescription fixed-dose
combination drug product containing
benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc acetate
that is labeled with an indication to
relieve pain, congestion, and swelling
caused by middle ear inflammation
(acute otitis media), and to help remove
earwax. Potential adverse reactions
include methemoglobinemia and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
contact hypersensitivity, pruritus,
stinging, burning, and irritation.
FDA is also aware of an unapproved
and misbranded prescription fixed-dose
combination drug product containing
benzocaine, chloroxylenol, and
hydrocortisone that is labeled for the
treatment of superficial infections of the
external auditory canal complicated by
inflammation caused by organisms
susceptible to the action of the
antimicrobial, and to control itching in
the auditory canal. Unapproved and
misbranded prescription fixed-dose
combination products containing
chloroxylenol and pramoxine are also
on the market and labeled for treating
superficial external ear infections and
the associated itching. Potential adverse
reactions for these fixed-dose
combination products include contact
hypersensitivity, pruritus, stinging,
burning, and irritation.
In addition, FDA is aware of various
unapproved and misbranded
prescription fixed-dose combination
drug products containing chloroxylenol,
pramoxine, and hydrocortisone that are
labeled with analgesic, antiinflammatory and anti-infective
indications. The chloroxylenol,
pramoxine, and hydrocortisone drug
products are labeled for the treatment of
superficial infections of the outer ear,
inflammation, and itching. Potential
adverse reactions include pruritus,
stinging, burning, and irritation.
In addition to the safety concerns
listed previously, these drugs present
direct challenges to the FDA drug
approval system and, in some cases, the
OTC monograph system. These drugs
directly challenge the new drug
approval system by competing with
approved otic drug products
appropriately labeled for antiinflammatory uses and the treatment of
otitis externa. The unapproved and
misbranded drug products covered by
this notice also pose a direct challenge
to the OTC drug monograph system
because they compete with legally
marketed OTC products labeled for
cerumen removal and ear drying aid
indications under an OTC drug
monograph (part 344 (21 CFR part 344)).
For the reasons described in sections
II and III, among others, FDA’s drug
approval process is critical to protecting
the public health. Drugs are evaluated
by FDA before being marketed to ensure
that they are safe and effective for their
intended uses and are only approved for
marketing after a careful risk-benefit
analysis. The drug approval process is
designed to avoid the risks associated
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38213
with potentially unsafe, ineffective, and
fraudulent drugs.1
II. Safety and Effectiveness Concerns
With Unapproved New Drugs
The new drug approval process
affords FDA the opportunity to review
and evaluate a drug before it is marketed
to ensure safety, efficacy, and quality.
This includes reviewing the processes
used to manufacture the active
pharmaceutical ingredient(s) and the
finished drug product, and the labeling
of the drug product. Because marketed
unapproved new drug products have
not undergone FDA’s rigorous
premarket review and approval process,
they may present safety risks. This is
particularly true because FDA has not
reviewed and approved the label for
unapproved new drugs, so some
unapproved drug labeling omits or
modifies safety warnings or other
information that is important to ensure
safe use, such as drug interactions or
potential adverse experiences.
With respect to the otic drug products
subject to this notice, FDA is
particularly concerned about pediatric
labeling because these drug products are
often prescribed for young children, a
population most susceptible to ear
infections (Ref 3). FDA has not assessed
the scientific support, if any, for the use
of these drug products in pediatric
populations. In other words, none of
these products have been shown to be
safe for use in any population, including
children or infants. In fact, as described
in section I, FDA has received at least
five adverse events reports associated
with unapproved prescription otic
products. There is also the potential for
rare, but serious adverse events to occur,
including methemoglobinemia, a
dangerous blood disorder. Not all of
these adverse events are included in the
labeling for these unapproved drug
products.
FDA also has concerns regarding the
manufacturing processes for
unapproved new drugs. When new
drugs are marketed without FDA
approval, FDA does not have an
opportunity, prior to product marketing,
to determine whether the manufacturing
processes for the drugs are adequate to
ensure that they are of suitable quality.
For example, the Agency scrutinizes
the chemistry, manufacturing, and
controls involved in producing the
active pharmaceutical ingredient (API or
drug substance) and finished dosage
1 See ‘‘Marketed Unapproved Drugs—Compliance
Policy Guide’’ (Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG)
at 5, available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/UCM070290.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
38214
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Notices
form or drug product.2 With respect to
the drug substance, FDA’s examination
includes the following: (1) Physical and
chemical characteristics and stability of
the drug substance; (2) the process
controls used in manufacturing and
packaging; and (3) specifications
necessary to ensure the identity,
strength, quality, and purity of the drug
substance. For the drug product, FDA’s
review includes the following: (1) The
specifications for the components used
in the manufacture of the drug product;
(2) manufacturing and packaging
procedures and process controls; and (3)
the specifications necessary to ensure
the identity, strength, quality, and
purity of the drug product. Unapproved
drug products do not undergo this
review process, and therefore the
quality of the finished drug product is
uncertain.
Because unapproved new drugs have
not been subject to FDA’s premarket
review and approval process, FDA
cannot be sure that unapproved drugs
are effective. Section 505(d) of the FD&C
Act requires ‘‘substantial evidence’’ of
safety and effectiveness. ‘‘Substantial
evidence’’ is evidence consisting of
adequate and well-controlled
investigations, including clinical
investigations, by experts qualified by
scientific training and experience to
evaluate the effectiveness of the drug
involved, on the basis of which it could
fairly and responsibly be concluded by
such experts that the drug will have the
effect it purports or is represented to
have under the conditions of use
prescribed, recommended, or suggested
in the labeling or proposed labeling
thereof (section 505(d)(7) of the FD&C
Act).
Among other characteristics, an
adequate and well-controlled study
must use a design that permits a valid
comparison with a control to provide a
quantitative assessment of the pertinent
drug effects (§ 314.126(b)(2)) (21 CFR
314.126(b)(2)). The method of selection
of subjects must assure that those
subjects have the disease or condition
being studied (§ 314.126(b)(3)) .
A review of the current literature
suggests that the efficacy of unapproved
prescription otic drugs in managing
pain associated with ear infections is
uncertain (Ref. 4). Use of unapproved
products of uncertain efficacy may
delay treatment with products that have
2 See, generally, § 314.50(d) (21 CFR 314.50(d)).
See also section 505(d)(3) of the FD&C Act requiring
FDA to determine whether the methods used in,
and the facilities and controls used for, the
manufacture, processing, and packing of such a
drug are adequate to preserve its identity, strength,
quality, and purity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
been proven to be effective, leading to
undue prolonged pain and discomfort.
In conclusion, these drug products are
marketed without evidence of safety and
effectiveness; present actual and
potential safety concerns; and pose a
direct challenge to the new drug
approval system. In some cases, they
may directly challenge the OTC drug
monograph system.
III. Legal Status of Products Identified
in This Notice
FDA has reviewed the publicly
available scientific literature for the
following unapproved prescription drug
products: (1) Single-ingredient otic drug
products containing benzocaine; (2)
fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing benzocaine and
antipyrine; (3) fixed-dose combination
otic drug products containing
benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc
acetate; (4) fixed-dose combination otic
drug products containing benzocaine,
chloroxylenol, and hydrocortisone; (5)
fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing chloroxylenol and
pramoxine; and (6) fixed-dose
combination otic drug products
containing chloroxylenol, pramoxine,
and hydrocortisone. In no case did FDA
find literature sufficient to support a
determination that any of these
prescription products are generally
recognized as safe and effective.
Therefore, these prescription drug
products are ‘‘new drugs’’ within the
meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 321(p)), and they require
approved new drug applications (NDAs)
or abbreviated new drug applications
(ANDAs) to be legally marketed.
The unapproved drug products
covered by this notice are labeled for
prescription use. Prescription drugs are
defined under section 503(b)(1)(A) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1)(A)) as
drugs that, because of toxicity or other
potentially harmful effect, are not safe to
use except under the supervision of a
practitioner licensed by law to
administer such drugs. If an unapproved
drug product covered by this notice
meets the definition of ‘‘prescription
drug’’ in section 503(b)(1)(A) of the
FD&C Act, adequate directions cannot
be written for it so that a layman can use
the product safely for its intended uses
(21 CFR 201.5). Consequently, it is
misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) in
that it fails to bear adequate directions
for use. A prescription drug is exempt
from the requirement in section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act that it bear
adequate directions for use if, among
other things, it bears the FDA-approved
labeling (21 CFR 201.100(c)(2) and
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
201.115). Because the prescription drug
products subject to this notice do not
have approved applications with
approved labeling, they fail to qualify
for the exemptions to the requirement
that they bear ‘‘adequate directions for
use,’’ and are misbranded under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act.
If a drug covered by this notice is
labeled as a prescription drug but does
not meet the definition of ‘‘prescription
drug’’ under section 503(b)(1)(A) of the
FD&C Act, the drug is misbranded
under section 503(b)(4)(B).
The final OTC drug monograph in
part 344, ‘‘Topical Otic Drug Products
for Over-the Counter Human Use’’
(Topical Otic Drug monograph), permits
the use of carbamide peroxide 6.5
percent formulated in an anhydrous
glycerin vehicle as an active ingredient
for earwax removal, in the amounts and
under the conditions specified in the
final Topical Otic Drug monograph (see
§ 344.10). The final OTC drug
monograph also permits the use of
isopropyl alcohol 95 percent in an
anhydrous glycerin 5 percent base as an
ear drying aid in the amounts and under
the conditions specified in the final
Topical Otic Drug monograph (see
§ 344.12).
The final Topical Otic Drug
monograph is the only monograph that
specifies the requirements for marketing
an OTC drug for cerumen removal.
Unless a product included in this notice
was reformulated and labeled to meet
all the requirements of the final Topical
Otic Drug monograph, the product
would require an approved NDA or
ANDA to be legally marketed.3
IV. Notice of Intent To Take
Enforcement Action
Although not required to do so by the
Administrative Procedure Act, by the
FD&C Act (or any rules issued under its
authority), or for any other legal reason,
FDA is providing this notice to persons 4
who are marketing the following
unapproved and misbranded drugs
labeled for prescription use: (1) Singleingredient otic drug products containing
benzocaine; (2) fixed-dose combination
otic drug products containing
benzocaine and antipyrine; (3) fixeddose combination otic drug products
containing benzocaine, antipyrine, and
zinc acetate; (4) fixed-dose combination
otic drug products containing
benzocaine, chloroxylenol, and
3 In addition to any other applicable
requirements, firms that manufacture OTC drugs
must comply with the labeling requirements in 21
CFR 201.66.
4 The term ‘‘person’’ includes individuals,
partnerships, corporations, and associations (21
U.S.C. 321(e)).
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Notices
hydrocortisone; (5) fixed-dose
combination otic drug products
containing chloroxylenol and
pramoxine; and (6) fixed-dose
combination otic drug products
containing chloroxylenol, pramoxine,
and hydrocortisone. The Agency
intends to take enforcement action
against such products and those who
manufacture them or cause them to be
manufactured or shipped in interstate
commerce.
Manufacturing or shipping the drug
products covered by this notice can
result in enforcement action, including
seizure, injunction, or other judicial or
administrative proceeding.5 Consistent
with policies described in the Agency’s
Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG
(available at https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
UCM070290.pdf), the Agency does not
expect to issue a warning letter or any
other further warning to firms marketing
drug products covered by this notice
before taking enforcement action. The
Agency also reminds firms that, as
stated in the Marketed Unapproved
Drugs CPG, any unapproved drug
marketed without a required approved
application is subject to Agency
enforcement action at any time. The
issuance of this notice does not in any
way obligate the Agency to issue similar
notices (or any notice) in the future
regarding marketed unapproved drugs
(see Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG
at 5).
As described in the Marketed
Unapproved Drugs CPG, the Agency
may, at its discretion, identify a period
of time (i.e., a grace period) during
which the Agency does not intend to
initiate an enforcement action against a
currently marketed unapproved drug
solely on the grounds that the drug lacks
an approved application under section
505 of the FD&C Act. In deciding
whether to allow such a grace period,
the Agency considers several factors,
which are described in the Marketed
Unapproved Drugs CPG. With respect to
drug products covered by this notice,
the Agency intends to exercise its
enforcement discretion for only a
limited period of time, because there are
readily available legally marketed
alternatives. Therefore, the Agency
intends to implement this notice as
follows.
For the effective date of this notice,
see the DATES section of this document.
5 In fact, U.S. Marshals seized $16.5 million of
Auralgan Otic Solution (which contains antipyrine
and benzocaine) after Deston continued to market
the unapproved new drug following an FDA
warning letter. See https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/
Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm243638.htm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
Any drug product covered by this notice
that a company (including a
manufacturer or distributor) began
marketing after September 19, 2011, is
subject to immediate enforcement
action. For products covered by this
notice that a company (including a
manufacturer or distributor) began
marketing on or before September 19,
2011, FDA intends to take enforcement
action against any such product that is
not listed with the Agency in full
compliance with section 510 of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360) before July 1,
2015, and is manufactured, shipped, or
otherwise introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce
by any person on or after July 1, 2015.
FDA also intends to take enforcement
action against any drug product covered
by this notice that is listed with FDA in
full compliance with section 510 of the
FD&C Act but is not being commercially
used or sold 6 in the United States before
July 1, 2015, and that is manufactured,
shipped, or otherwise introduced or
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce by any person on or after July
2, 2015.
However, for drug products covered
by this notice that a company (including
a manufacturer or distributor): (1) Began
marketing in the United States on or
before September 19, 2011; (2) are listed
with FDA in full compliance with
section 510 of the FD&C Act before July
1, 2015 (‘‘currently marketed and
listed’’); and (3) are manufactured,
shipped, or otherwise introduced or
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce by any person on or after July
2, 2015, the Agency intends to exercise
its enforcement discretion as follows:
FDA intends to initiate enforcement
action regarding any such currently
marketed and listed product that is
manufactured on or after August 17,
2015, or that is shipped on or after
September 30, 2015. Furthermore, FDA
intends to take enforcement action
against any person who manufactures or
ships such products after these dates.
The purpose of these enforcement
timeframes is to allow manufacturers
and distributors to deplete their current
inventory and ensure a smooth
transition for consumers. Any person
who has submitted or submits an
application for a drug product covered
by this notice but has not received
approval must comply with this notice.
The Agency, however, does not
intend to exercise its enforcement
discretion as outlined previously if
6 For the purpose of this notice, the phrase
‘‘commercially used or sold’’ means that the
product has been used in a business or activity
involving retail or wholesale marketing and/or sale.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38215
either of the following applies: (1) A
manufacturer or distributor of drug
products covered by this notice is
violating other provisions of the FD&C
Act, including, but not limited to,
violations related to FDA’s current good
manufacturing practices, adverse drug
event reporting, labeling, or
misbranding requirements other than
those identified in this notice or (2) it
appears that a firm, in response to this
notice, increases its manufacture or
interstate shipment of drug products
covered by this notice above its usual
volume during these periods.7
Nothing in this notice, including
FDA’s intent to exercise its enforcement
discretion, alters any person’s liability
or obligations in any other enforcement
action, or precludes the Agency from
initiating or proceeding with
enforcement action in connection with
any other alleged violation of the FD&C
Act, whether or not related to a drug
product covered by this notice.
Similarly, a person who is or becomes
enjoined from marketing unapproved or
misbranded drugs may not resume
marketing of such products based on
FDA’s exercise of enforcement
discretion as described in this notice.
Drug manufacturers and distributors
should be aware that the Agency is
exercising its enforcement discretion as
described previously only in regard to
drug products covered by this notice
that are marketed under a National Drug
Code (NDC) number listed with the
Agency in full compliance with section
510 of the FD&C Act before July 1, 2015.
As previously stated, drug products
covered by this notice that are currently
marketed but not listed with the Agency
on the date of this notice must, as of the
effective date of this notice, have
approved applications before their
shipment in interstate commerce.
Moreover, any person or firm that has
submitted or submits an application but
has yet to receive approval for such
products is still responsible for full
compliance with this notice.
V. Discontinued Products
Some firms may have previously
discontinued manufacturing or
distributing products covered by this
notice without discontinuing the listing
as required under section 510(j) of the
FD&C Act. Other firms may discontinue
7 If FDA decides to take enforcement action
against a product covered by this notice, the Agency
may simultaneously take action relating to
defendant’s other violations of the FD&C Act. See,
e.g., United States v. Sage Pharmaceuticals, 210 F.
3d 475, 479–480 (5th Cir. 2000) (permitting the
Agency to combine all violations of the FD&C Act
in one proceeding, rather than taking action against
multiple violations of the FD&C Act in ‘‘piecemeal
fashion’’).
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
38216
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Notices
2. Cortazzo, J. A. and A. D. Lichtman,
‘‘Methemoglobinemia: A Review and
Recommendations for Management.’’
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular
Anesthesia, vol. 28(4), pp. 1055–1059.
2014.
3. Lieberthal, A. S., A. E. Carroll, T.
Chonmaitree, et al., ‘‘The Diagnosis and
Management of Acute Otitis Media,’’
Pediatrics, vol. 131, pp. e964–e999,
2013.
4. Wood, D. N., N. Naas, and C. W. Gregory,
‘‘Clinical Trials Assessing Ototopical
Agents in the Treatment of Pain
Associated with Acute Otitis Media in
Children,’’ International Journal of
Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 76, pp. 1229–
1335, 2012.
VI. Reformulated Products
FDA cautions firms against
reformulating their products into
unapproved new drugs without
benzocaine; benzocaine and antipyrine;
benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc
acetate; benzocaine, chloroxylenol, and
hydrocortisone; chloroxylenol and
pramoxine; or chloroxylenol,
pramoxine, and hydrocortisone and
marketing them under the same name or
substantially the same name (including
a new name that contains the old name)
in anticipation of an enforcement action
based on this notice. As stated in the
Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG, FDA
intends to give higher priority to
enforcement actions involving
unapproved drugs that are reformulated
to evade an anticipated FDA
enforcement action but have not been
brought into compliance with the law.
In addition, reformulated products
marketed under a name previously
identified with a different active
ingredient have the potential to confuse
healthcare practitioners and harm
patients.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
manufacturing or distributing listed
products in response to this notice. All
firms are required to electronically
update the listing of their products
under section 510(j) of the FD&C Act to
reflect discontinuation of unapproved
products covered by this notice (21 CFR
207.21(b)). Questions on electronic drug
listing updates should be sent to
eDRLS@fda.hhs.gov. In addition to the
required update, firms can also notify
the Agency of product discontinuation
by sending a letter, signed by the firm’s
chief executive officer and fully
identifying the discontinued product(s),
including the product NDC number(s),
and stating that the manufacturing and/
or distribution of the product(s) have
been discontinued. The letter should be
sent electronically to Kathleen Joyce
(see ADDRESSES). FDA plans to rely on
its existing records, including its drug
listing records, the results of any
subsequent inspections, or other
available information when considering
enforcement action.
Food and Drug Administration
I. Background
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0967]
On July 9, 2012, the President signed
into law the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112–144). Title I
of FDASIA reauthorizes the Prescription
Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), which
provides FDA with the necessary user
fee resources to maintain an efficient
review process for human drug and
biologic products. The reauthorization
of PDUFA includes performance goals
and procedures that represent FDA’s
commitments during FYs 2013–2017.
These commitments are referred to in
section 101 of FDASIA and are available
on the FDA Web site at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/
UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
UCM270412.pdf.
Section X of these commitments
relates to enhancing benefit-risk
assessments in regulatory decision
making. A key part of regulatory
decision making is establishing the
context in which the particular decision
is made. For purposes of drug marketing
approval, this includes an
understanding of the severity of the
treated condition and the adequacy of
the available therapies. Patients who
live with a disease have a direct stake
in the outcome of FDA’s decisions and
are in a unique position to contribute to
the Agency’s understanding of their
disease.
FDA has committed to obtaining the
patient perspective on at least 20
disease areas during the course of
PDUFA V. For each disease area, the
Agency will conduct a public meeting to
VIII. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov.
1. Logan, B. K. and A.M. Gordon, ‘‘Case
Report: Death of an Infant Involving
Benzocaine,’’ Journal of Forensic
Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 1486–1488, 2005.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–16360 Filed 7–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Prescription Drug User Fee Act
Patient-Focused Drug Development;
Announcement of Disease Areas for
Meetings Conducted in Fiscal Years
2016–2017
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the selection of disease
areas to be addressed during fiscal years
(FYs) 2016–2017of its Patient-Focused
Drug Development Initiative. This
initiative is being conducted to fulfill
FDA’s performance commitments under
the fifth authorization of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA
V). This effort provides a more
systematic approach under PDUFA V
for obtaining the patients’ perspective
on disease severity and currently
available treatments for a set of disease
areas. FDA selected these disease areas
based on a careful consideration of the
public comments received after
publication of a preliminary list of
disease areas in the Federal Register on
October 8, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The general schedule of FYs
2016–2017 Patient-Focused Drug
Development meetings, along with
materials from past meetings (such as
transcripts and webcast recordings)
from past meetings, can be found at the
Web site for Patient-Focused Drug
Development, https://www.fda.gov/
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ForIndustry/UserFees/
PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
ucm326192.htm. Individual comments
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2012-N-09670595 or by visiting the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Graham Thompson, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1146,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
5003, FAX: 301–847–8443, email:
PatientFocused@fda.hhs.gov, or Stephen
Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 240–402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38212-38216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-2008]
Unapproved and Misbranded Otic Prescription Drug Products;
Enforcement Action Dates
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
its intention to take enforcement action against unapproved and
misbranded otic drug products labeled for prescription use and
containing benzocaine; benzocaine and antipyrine; benzocaine,
antipyrine, and zinc acetate; benzocaine, chloroxylenol, and
hydrocortisone; chloroxylenol and pramoxine; or chloroxylenol,
pramoxine, and hydrocortisone; and against persons who manufacture or
cause the manufacture or distribution of such products in interstate
commerce. These unapproved and misbranded prescription drug products
are marketed without evidence of safety and effectiveness; may present
safety concerns; and pose a direct challenge to the new drug approval
system and, in some cases, the over-the-counter (OTC) drug monograph
system.
DATES: This notice is effective July 2, 2015. For information about
enforcement dates, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, section IV.
ADDRESSES: For all communications in response to this notice, identify
with Docket No. FDA-2015-N-2008 and direct to the appropriate office
listed in this ADDRESSES section as follows:
Applications under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(b)): Division of Anesthesia,
Analgesia, and Addiction Products (for drug products with analgesic and
anti-inflammatory indications), or Division of Anti-Infective Drug
Products (for drug products with anti-infective indications), Office of
New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002.
Applications under section 505(j) of the FD&C Act: Office of
Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002.
All other communications about this action should be directed to:
Kathleen Joyce, Division of Prescription Drugs, Office of Unapproved
Drugs and Labeling Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm.
5236, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; 301-796-3329 or email:
Kathleen.Joyce@fda.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Joyce, Division of
Prescription Drugs, Office of Unapproved Drugs and Labeling Compliance,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5236, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002; 301-796-3329 or email: Kathleen.Joyce@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing its intention to take enforcement action against
certain unapproved and misbranded otic drug products labeled for
prescription use. These marketed unapproved and misbranded otic drug
products are labeled for, among other things, the temporary relief of
pain associated with ear infections or inflammation, including acute
otitis media (middle ear infection), otitis media with effusion (fluid
in the ear, but without infection), and acute otitis externa (infection
in the outer ear or ``swimmer's ear''). Other indications for these
unapproved drug products include anti-infective and anti-inflammatory
claims, as well as claims for the removal of cerumen (earwax).
This notice covers the following marketed unapproved prescription
otic drug products: (1) Single-ingredient otic drug products containing
benzocaine; (2) fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing
benzocaine and antipyrine; (3) fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc
[[Page 38213]]
acetate; (4) fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing
benzocaine, chloroxylenol, and hydrocortisone; (5) fixed-dose
combination otic drug products containing chloroxylenol and pramoxine;
and (6) fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing
chloroxylenol, pramoxine, and hydrocortisone. These drug products are
marketed without evidence of safety and effectiveness, present safety
concerns, and pose a direct challenge to the new drug approval system
and, in some cases, the OTC drug monograph system.
For example, FDA is aware of many unapproved and misbranded
prescription fixed-dose combination drug products containing benzocaine
and antipyrine that are labeled for use for the prompt relief of pain
and reduction of inflammation in the congestive and serous stages of
acute otitis media and for adjuvant therapy during systemic antibiotic
administration for resolution of acute otitis media. These products
have also been labeled to facilitate the removal of excessive or
impacted cerumen. FDA has received at least five adverse event reports
of allergic reactions to these drug products, including angioedema of
the ear, eye, face, neck, and/or mouth. We are also aware of at least
one case of methemoglobinemia associated with the administration of an
otic product containing benzocaine in an infant, which resulted in
death (Ref. 1). Methemoglobinemia is a serious blood disorder in which
an abnormal amount of methemoglobin (a form of hemoglobin) is produced
(Ref. 2). Other less serious adverse reactions associated with these
products include contact hypersensitivity, pruritus, stinging, burning,
and irritation.
FDA is also aware of at least one unapproved and misbranded
prescription single-ingredient otic drug product containing benzocaine
that is labeled for use as a topical anesthetic in the external
auditory canal to relieve ear pain, and for the treatment of acute
otitis media, acute swimmer's ear, and other forms of otitis externa.
Potential adverse reactions include methemoglobinemia, local burning,
stinging, tenderness or edema, and hypersensitivity reactions.
FDA is aware of an unapproved and misbranded prescription fixed-
dose combination drug product containing benzocaine, antipyrine, and
zinc acetate that is labeled with an indication to relieve pain,
congestion, and swelling caused by middle ear inflammation (acute
otitis media), and to help remove earwax. Potential adverse reactions
include methemoglobinemia and contact hypersensitivity, pruritus,
stinging, burning, and irritation.
FDA is also aware of an unapproved and misbranded prescription
fixed-dose combination drug product containing benzocaine,
chloroxylenol, and hydrocortisone that is labeled for the treatment of
superficial infections of the external auditory canal complicated by
inflammation caused by organisms susceptible to the action of the
antimicrobial, and to control itching in the auditory canal. Unapproved
and misbranded prescription fixed-dose combination products containing
chloroxylenol and pramoxine are also on the market and labeled for
treating superficial external ear infections and the associated
itching. Potential adverse reactions for these fixed-dose combination
products include contact hypersensitivity, pruritus, stinging, burning,
and irritation.
In addition, FDA is aware of various unapproved and misbranded
prescription fixed-dose combination drug products containing
chloroxylenol, pramoxine, and hydrocortisone that are labeled with
analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-infective indications. The
chloroxylenol, pramoxine, and hydrocortisone drug products are labeled
for the treatment of superficial infections of the outer ear,
inflammation, and itching. Potential adverse reactions include
pruritus, stinging, burning, and irritation.
In addition to the safety concerns listed previously, these drugs
present direct challenges to the FDA drug approval system and, in some
cases, the OTC monograph system. These drugs directly challenge the new
drug approval system by competing with approved otic drug products
appropriately labeled for anti-inflammatory uses and the treatment of
otitis externa. The unapproved and misbranded drug products covered by
this notice also pose a direct challenge to the OTC drug monograph
system because they compete with legally marketed OTC products labeled
for cerumen removal and ear drying aid indications under an OTC drug
monograph (part 344 (21 CFR part 344)).
For the reasons described in sections II and III, among others,
FDA's drug approval process is critical to protecting the public
health. Drugs are evaluated by FDA before being marketed to ensure that
they are safe and effective for their intended uses and are only
approved for marketing after a careful risk-benefit analysis. The drug
approval process is designed to avoid the risks associated with
potentially unsafe, ineffective, and fraudulent drugs.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See ``Marketed Unapproved Drugs--Compliance Policy Guide''
(Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG) at 5, available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070290.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Safety and Effectiveness Concerns With Unapproved New Drugs
The new drug approval process affords FDA the opportunity to review
and evaluate a drug before it is marketed to ensure safety, efficacy,
and quality. This includes reviewing the processes used to manufacture
the active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) and the finished drug product,
and the labeling of the drug product. Because marketed unapproved new
drug products have not undergone FDA's rigorous premarket review and
approval process, they may present safety risks. This is particularly
true because FDA has not reviewed and approved the label for unapproved
new drugs, so some unapproved drug labeling omits or modifies safety
warnings or other information that is important to ensure safe use,
such as drug interactions or potential adverse experiences.
With respect to the otic drug products subject to this notice, FDA
is particularly concerned about pediatric labeling because these drug
products are often prescribed for young children, a population most
susceptible to ear infections (Ref 3). FDA has not assessed the
scientific support, if any, for the use of these drug products in
pediatric populations. In other words, none of these products have been
shown to be safe for use in any population, including children or
infants. In fact, as described in section I, FDA has received at least
five adverse events reports associated with unapproved prescription
otic products. There is also the potential for rare, but serious
adverse events to occur, including methemoglobinemia, a dangerous blood
disorder. Not all of these adverse events are included in the labeling
for these unapproved drug products.
FDA also has concerns regarding the manufacturing processes for
unapproved new drugs. When new drugs are marketed without FDA approval,
FDA does not have an opportunity, prior to product marketing, to
determine whether the manufacturing processes for the drugs are
adequate to ensure that they are of suitable quality.
For example, the Agency scrutinizes the chemistry, manufacturing,
and controls involved in producing the active pharmaceutical ingredient
(API or drug substance) and finished dosage
[[Page 38214]]
form or drug product.\2\ With respect to the drug substance, FDA's
examination includes the following: (1) Physical and chemical
characteristics and stability of the drug substance; (2) the process
controls used in manufacturing and packaging; and (3) specifications
necessary to ensure the identity, strength, quality, and purity of the
drug substance. For the drug product, FDA's review includes the
following: (1) The specifications for the components used in the
manufacture of the drug product; (2) manufacturing and packaging
procedures and process controls; and (3) the specifications necessary
to ensure the identity, strength, quality, and purity of the drug
product. Unapproved drug products do not undergo this review process,
and therefore the quality of the finished drug product is uncertain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See, generally, Sec. 314.50(d) (21 CFR 314.50(d)). See also
section 505(d)(3) of the FD&C Act requiring FDA to determine whether
the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the
manufacture, processing, and packing of such a drug are adequate to
preserve its identity, strength, quality, and purity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because unapproved new drugs have not been subject to FDA's
premarket review and approval process, FDA cannot be sure that
unapproved drugs are effective. Section 505(d) of the FD&C Act requires
``substantial evidence'' of safety and effectiveness. ``Substantial
evidence'' is evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled
investigations, including clinical investigations, by experts qualified
by scientific training and experience to evaluate the effectiveness of
the drug involved, on the basis of which it could fairly and
responsibly be concluded by such experts that the drug will have the
effect it purports or is represented to have under the conditions of
use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling or proposed
labeling thereof (section 505(d)(7) of the FD&C Act).
Among other characteristics, an adequate and well-controlled study
must use a design that permits a valid comparison with a control to
provide a quantitative assessment of the pertinent drug effects (Sec.
314.126(b)(2)) (21 CFR 314.126(b)(2)). The method of selection of
subjects must assure that those subjects have the disease or condition
being studied (Sec. 314.126(b)(3)) .
A review of the current literature suggests that the efficacy of
unapproved prescription otic drugs in managing pain associated with ear
infections is uncertain (Ref. 4). Use of unapproved products of
uncertain efficacy may delay treatment with products that have been
proven to be effective, leading to undue prolonged pain and discomfort.
In conclusion, these drug products are marketed without evidence of
safety and effectiveness; present actual and potential safety concerns;
and pose a direct challenge to the new drug approval system. In some
cases, they may directly challenge the OTC drug monograph system.
III. Legal Status of Products Identified in This Notice
FDA has reviewed the publicly available scientific literature for
the following unapproved prescription drug products: (1) Single-
ingredient otic drug products containing benzocaine; (2) fixed-dose
combination otic drug products containing benzocaine and antipyrine;
(3) fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing benzocaine,
antipyrine, and zinc acetate; (4) fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing benzocaine, chloroxylenol, and hydrocortisone; (5)
fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing chloroxylenol and
pramoxine; and (6) fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing
chloroxylenol, pramoxine, and hydrocortisone. In no case did FDA find
literature sufficient to support a determination that any of these
prescription products are generally recognized as safe and effective.
Therefore, these prescription drug products are ``new drugs'' within
the meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321(p)), and
they require approved new drug applications (NDAs) or abbreviated new
drug applications (ANDAs) to be legally marketed.
The unapproved drug products covered by this notice are labeled for
prescription use. Prescription drugs are defined under section
503(b)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1)(A)) as drugs that,
because of toxicity or other potentially harmful effect, are not safe
to use except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law
to administer such drugs. If an unapproved drug product covered by this
notice meets the definition of ``prescription drug'' in section
503(b)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act, adequate directions cannot be written for
it so that a layman can use the product safely for its intended uses
(21 CFR 201.5). Consequently, it is misbranded under section 502(f)(1)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) in that it fails to bear adequate
directions for use. A prescription drug is exempt from the requirement
in section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act that it bear adequate directions
for use if, among other things, it bears the FDA-approved labeling (21
CFR 201.100(c)(2) and 201.115). Because the prescription drug products
subject to this notice do not have approved applications with approved
labeling, they fail to qualify for the exemptions to the requirement
that they bear ``adequate directions for use,'' and are misbranded
under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act.
If a drug covered by this notice is labeled as a prescription drug
but does not meet the definition of ``prescription drug'' under section
503(b)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act, the drug is misbranded under section
503(b)(4)(B).
The final OTC drug monograph in part 344, ``Topical Otic Drug
Products for Over-the Counter Human Use'' (Topical Otic Drug
monograph), permits the use of carbamide peroxide 6.5 percent
formulated in an anhydrous glycerin vehicle as an active ingredient for
earwax removal, in the amounts and under the conditions specified in
the final Topical Otic Drug monograph (see Sec. 344.10). The final OTC
drug monograph also permits the use of isopropyl alcohol 95 percent in
an anhydrous glycerin 5 percent base as an ear drying aid in the
amounts and under the conditions specified in the final Topical Otic
Drug monograph (see Sec. 344.12).
The final Topical Otic Drug monograph is the only monograph that
specifies the requirements for marketing an OTC drug for cerumen
removal. Unless a product included in this notice was reformulated and
labeled to meet all the requirements of the final Topical Otic Drug
monograph, the product would require an approved NDA or ANDA to be
legally marketed.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In addition to any other applicable requirements, firms that
manufacture OTC drugs must comply with the labeling requirements in
21 CFR 201.66.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Notice of Intent To Take Enforcement Action
Although not required to do so by the Administrative Procedure Act,
by the FD&C Act (or any rules issued under its authority), or for any
other legal reason, FDA is providing this notice to persons \4\ who are
marketing the following unapproved and misbranded drugs labeled for
prescription use: (1) Single-ingredient otic drug products containing
benzocaine; (2) fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing
benzocaine and antipyrine; (3) fixed-dose combination otic drug
products containing benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc acetate; (4)
fixed-dose combination otic drug products containing benzocaine,
chloroxylenol, and
[[Page 38215]]
hydrocortisone; (5) fixed-dose combination otic drug products
containing chloroxylenol and pramoxine; and (6) fixed-dose combination
otic drug products containing chloroxylenol, pramoxine, and
hydrocortisone. The Agency intends to take enforcement action against
such products and those who manufacture them or cause them to be
manufactured or shipped in interstate commerce.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The term ``person'' includes individuals, partnerships,
corporations, and associations (21 U.S.C. 321(e)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturing or shipping the drug products covered by this notice
can result in enforcement action, including seizure, injunction, or
other judicial or administrative proceeding.\5\ Consistent with
policies described in the Agency's Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG
(available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070290.pdf), the
Agency does not expect to issue a warning letter or any other further
warning to firms marketing drug products covered by this notice before
taking enforcement action. The Agency also reminds firms that, as
stated in the Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG, any unapproved drug
marketed without a required approved application is subject to Agency
enforcement action at any time. The issuance of this notice does not in
any way obligate the Agency to issue similar notices (or any notice) in
the future regarding marketed unapproved drugs (see Marketed Unapproved
Drugs CPG at 5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In fact, U.S. Marshals seized $16.5 million of Auralgan Otic
Solution (which contains antipyrine and benzocaine) after Deston
continued to market the unapproved new drug following an FDA warning
letter. See https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm243638.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described in the Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG, the Agency may,
at its discretion, identify a period of time (i.e., a grace period)
during which the Agency does not intend to initiate an enforcement
action against a currently marketed unapproved drug solely on the
grounds that the drug lacks an approved application under section 505
of the FD&C Act. In deciding whether to allow such a grace period, the
Agency considers several factors, which are described in the Marketed
Unapproved Drugs CPG. With respect to drug products covered by this
notice, the Agency intends to exercise its enforcement discretion for
only a limited period of time, because there are readily available
legally marketed alternatives. Therefore, the Agency intends to
implement this notice as follows.
For the effective date of this notice, see the DATES section of
this document. Any drug product covered by this notice that a company
(including a manufacturer or distributor) began marketing after
September 19, 2011, is subject to immediate enforcement action. For
products covered by this notice that a company (including a
manufacturer or distributor) began marketing on or before September 19,
2011, FDA intends to take enforcement action against any such product
that is not listed with the Agency in full compliance with section 510
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360) before July 1, 2015, and is
manufactured, shipped, or otherwise introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce by any person on or after July 1,
2015. FDA also intends to take enforcement action against any drug
product covered by this notice that is listed with FDA in full
compliance with section 510 of the FD&C Act but is not being
commercially used or sold \6\ in the United States before July 1, 2015,
and that is manufactured, shipped, or otherwise introduced or delivered
for introduction into interstate commerce by any person on or after
July 2, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For the purpose of this notice, the phrase ``commercially
used or sold'' means that the product has been used in a business or
activity involving retail or wholesale marketing and/or sale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, for drug products covered by this notice that a company
(including a manufacturer or distributor): (1) Began marketing in the
United States on or before September 19, 2011; (2) are listed with FDA
in full compliance with section 510 of the FD&C Act before July 1, 2015
(``currently marketed and listed''); and (3) are manufactured, shipped,
or otherwise introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce by any person on or after July 2, 2015, the Agency intends to
exercise its enforcement discretion as follows: FDA intends to initiate
enforcement action regarding any such currently marketed and listed
product that is manufactured on or after August 17, 2015, or that is
shipped on or after September 30, 2015. Furthermore, FDA intends to
take enforcement action against any person who manufactures or ships
such products after these dates. The purpose of these enforcement
timeframes is to allow manufacturers and distributors to deplete their
current inventory and ensure a smooth transition for consumers. Any
person who has submitted or submits an application for a drug product
covered by this notice but has not received approval must comply with
this notice.
The Agency, however, does not intend to exercise its enforcement
discretion as outlined previously if either of the following applies:
(1) A manufacturer or distributor of drug products covered by this
notice is violating other provisions of the FD&C Act, including, but
not limited to, violations related to FDA's current good manufacturing
practices, adverse drug event reporting, labeling, or misbranding
requirements other than those identified in this notice or (2) it
appears that a firm, in response to this notice, increases its
manufacture or interstate shipment of drug products covered by this
notice above its usual volume during these periods.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ If FDA decides to take enforcement action against a product
covered by this notice, the Agency may simultaneously take action
relating to defendant's other violations of the FD&C Act. See, e.g.,
United States v. Sage Pharmaceuticals, 210 F. 3d 475, 479-480 (5th
Cir. 2000) (permitting the Agency to combine all violations of the
FD&C Act in one proceeding, rather than taking action against
multiple violations of the FD&C Act in ``piecemeal fashion'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing in this notice, including FDA's intent to exercise its
enforcement discretion, alters any person's liability or obligations in
any other enforcement action, or precludes the Agency from initiating
or proceeding with enforcement action in connection with any other
alleged violation of the FD&C Act, whether or not related to a drug
product covered by this notice. Similarly, a person who is or becomes
enjoined from marketing unapproved or misbranded drugs may not resume
marketing of such products based on FDA's exercise of enforcement
discretion as described in this notice.
Drug manufacturers and distributors should be aware that the Agency
is exercising its enforcement discretion as described previously only
in regard to drug products covered by this notice that are marketed
under a National Drug Code (NDC) number listed with the Agency in full
compliance with section 510 of the FD&C Act before July 1, 2015. As
previously stated, drug products covered by this notice that are
currently marketed but not listed with the Agency on the date of this
notice must, as of the effective date of this notice, have approved
applications before their shipment in interstate commerce. Moreover,
any person or firm that has submitted or submits an application but has
yet to receive approval for such products is still responsible for full
compliance with this notice.
V. Discontinued Products
Some firms may have previously discontinued manufacturing or
distributing products covered by this notice without discontinuing the
listing as required under section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. Other firms
may discontinue
[[Page 38216]]
manufacturing or distributing listed products in response to this
notice. All firms are required to electronically update the listing of
their products under section 510(j) of the FD&C Act to reflect
discontinuation of unapproved products covered by this notice (21 CFR
207.21(b)). Questions on electronic drug listing updates should be sent
to eDRLS@fda.hhs.gov. In addition to the required update, firms can
also notify the Agency of product discontinuation by sending a letter,
signed by the firm's chief executive officer and fully identifying the
discontinued product(s), including the product NDC number(s), and
stating that the manufacturing and/or distribution of the product(s)
have been discontinued. The letter should be sent electronically to
Kathleen Joyce (see ADDRESSES). FDA plans to rely on its existing
records, including its drug listing records, the results of any
subsequent inspections, or other available information when considering
enforcement action.
VI. Reformulated Products
FDA cautions firms against reformulating their products into
unapproved new drugs without benzocaine; benzocaine and antipyrine;
benzocaine, antipyrine, and zinc acetate; benzocaine, chloroxylenol,
and hydrocortisone; chloroxylenol and pramoxine; or chloroxylenol,
pramoxine, and hydrocortisone and marketing them under the same name or
substantially the same name (including a new name that contains the old
name) in anticipation of an enforcement action based on this notice. As
stated in the Marketed Unapproved Drugs CPG, FDA intends to give higher
priority to enforcement actions involving unapproved drugs that are
reformulated to evade an anticipated FDA enforcement action but have
not been brought into compliance with the law. In addition,
reformulated products marketed under a name previously identified with
a different active ingredient have the potential to confuse healthcare
practitioners and harm patients.
VIII. References
The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and are available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov.
1. Logan, B. K. and A.M. Gordon, ``Case Report: Death of an Infant
Involving Benzocaine,'' Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 50, pp.
1486-1488, 2005.
2. Cortazzo, J. A. and A. D. Lichtman, ``Methemoglobinemia: A Review
and Recommendations for Management.'' Journal of Cardiothoracic and
Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 28(4), pp. 1055-1059. 2014.
3. Lieberthal, A. S., A. E. Carroll, T. Chonmaitree, et al., ``The
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media,'' Pediatrics, vol.
131, pp. e964-e999, 2013.
4. Wood, D. N., N. Naas, and C. W. Gregory, ``Clinical Trials
Assessing Ototopical Agents in the Treatment of Pain Associated with
Acute Otitis Media in Children,'' International Journal of
Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 76, pp. 1229-1335, 2012.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-16360 Filed 7-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P