Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 38036-38038 [2015-16165]
Download as PDF
38036
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24,
2015.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–16155 Filed 7–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1991; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–251–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318–111 and –112
airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, and
–115 airplanes; Model A320–214
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112,
–211, –212, and –213 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports
of cracked cadmium-plated lock nuts
that attach the hinge to the fan cowl
door. This proposed AD would require
inspecting to determine the serial
number of each engine fan cowl door,
inspecting for cracking of the hinge lock
nuts of any affected door, and replacing
the lock nuts if necessary. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
cracking of the hinge lock nuts, which
could result in separation of the hinge
from the fan cowl door, in-flight loss of
the door, and consequent damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:02 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact the following:
For Airbus service information
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office—
EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33
5 61 93 44 51; email: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com.
For Goodrich service information
contact Goodrich Aerostructures, 850
Lagoon Drive, Chula Vista, California,
91910–2098; telephone: 619–691–2719;
email: jan.lewis@goodrich.com; Internet:
https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1991; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone: 425–227–1405;
fax: 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–1991; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–251–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0276, dated December
19, 2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Airbus
Model A318–111 and –112 airplanes;
Model A319–111, –112, and –115
airplanes; Model A320–214 airplanes;
and Model A321–111, –112, –211, –212,
and –213 airplanes. The MCAI states:
In-service findings have been reported of
cracked cadmium plated lock nuts. This
cracking occurs shortly after installation.
Investigation results attribute the cause to an
improper manufacturing procedure of the
nuts. It was determined that the affected
batch of lock nuts was used on the fan cowl
to attach hinges to the cowl doors on
CFM56–5B engines only.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to separation of the hinge from the fan cowl
door, possibly resulting in in-flight loss of a
fan cowl door, with consequent damage to
the aeroplane and/or injury to persons on the
ground.
For the reasons describes above, this
[EASA] AD required identification of the
affected fan cowl doors, a one-time
inspection of the fan cowl door hinge nuts
and, depending on findings, replacement of
the affected nuts.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1991.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–71–1062, including Appendix 01,
dated July 28, 2014. Goodrich
Aerostructures has issued Service
Bulletin RA32071–151, dated June 11,
2014. The service information describes
procedures for inspection of the hinge
nuts of the fan cowl door, and
replacement if necessary. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of these same
type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 437 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $0 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $74,290, or $170 per
product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority for This Rulemaking
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:02 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2015–1991;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–251–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 17,
2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes identified
in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4)
of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(1) Airbus Model A318–111 and –112
airplanes.
(2) Airbus Model A319–111, –112, and
–115 airplanes.
(3) Airbus Model A320–214 airplanes.
(4) Airbus Model A321–111, –112, –211,
212, and –213 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 71, Powerplant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracked cadmium-plated lock nuts that attach
the hinge to the fan cowl door. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking
of the hinge lock nuts, which could result in
separation of the hinge from the fan cowl
door, the in-flight loss of the door, and
consequent damage to the airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38037
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspect To Determine Serial Number
Within 24 months after the effective date
of this AD: Inspect to determine if any fan
cowl door has a serial number 10029001
through 11092003 inclusive, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–71–1062,
dated July 28, 2014; or Goodrich
Aerostructures Service Bulletin RA32071–
151, dated June 11, 2014. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of the inspection required by this
paragraph, provided those records can be
relied upon for that purpose and the serial
number can be positively identified by that
review.
(h) Inspection and Replacement
For any fan cowl door having any serial
number identified in paragraph (g) of this
AD: Within 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, do a detailed inspection for
cracking of the hinge lock nuts of the door,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
71–1062, dated July 28, 2014; or Goodrich
Aerostructures Service Bulletin RA32071–
151, dated June 11, 2014. If any crack is
found, before further flight, replace each
cracked hinge lock nut, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–71–1062, dated July
28, 2014; or Goodrich Aerostructures Service
Bulletin RA32071–151, dated June 11, 2014.
(i) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits, as described in
Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone: 425–227–1405; fax: 425–227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
38038
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 127 / Thursday, July 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0276, dated
December 19, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–1991.
(2) For Airbus service information contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
(3) For Goodrich service information
contact Goodrich Aerostructures, 850 Lagoon
Drive, Chula Vista, California, 91910–2098;
telephone: 619–691–2719; email: jan.lewis@
goodrich.com; Internet: https://
www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
(4) You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24,
2015.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–16165 Filed 7–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–2455; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–180–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2008–26–
07, which applies to all McDonnell
Douglas Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–
8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8–33,
DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–8–43
airplanes; Model DC–8–50 series
airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC–
8F–55 airplanes; Model DC–8–60 series
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:02 Jul 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
airplanes; Model DC–8–60F series
airplanes; Model DC–8–70 series
airplanes; and Model DC–8–70F series
airplanes. AD 2008–26–07 currently
requires repetitive inspections of the
lower skin and stringers at certain
stations, and corrective actions if
necessary. This proposed AD is
intended to complete certain mandated
programs intended to support the
airplane reaching its limit of validity
(LOV) of the engineering data that
support the established structural
maintenance program. This proposed
AD would also require an eddy current
high frequency (ETHF) inspection for
cracks of the fastener open holes
common to the lower skins, stringers,
and splice fittings at a certain station;
installation of external doublers and
fasteners and repetitive eddy current
low frequency (ETLF) inspections
around the fasteners for any crack; and
corrective actions if necessary. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
cracks in the lower skins, stringers, and
fastener holes of the splice fittings,
which could result in the loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019,
Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 2; fax 206–
766–5683; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
2455.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
2455; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; telephone:
562–627–5239; fax: 562–627–5210;
email: Chandraduth.Ramdoss@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–2455; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–180–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On December 12, 2008, we issued AD
2008–26–07, Amendment 39–15773 (73
FR 78946, December 24, 2008), for all
McDonnell Douglas Model DC–8–11,
DC–8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32,
DC–8–33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–
8–43 airplanes; Model DC–8–50 series
airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC–
8F–55 airplanes; Model DC–8–60 series
airplanes; Model DC–8–60F series
airplanes; Model DC–8–70 series
airplanes; and Model DC–8–70F series
airplanes. AD 2008–26–07 requires
repetitive inspections of the lower skin
and stringers at stations Xw=408 and
Xw=-408, and corrective actions if
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38036-38038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16165]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1991; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-251-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, and -
115 airplanes; Model A320-214 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -
211, -212, and -213 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports
of cracked cadmium-plated lock nuts that attach the hinge to the fan
cowl door. This proposed AD would require inspecting to determine the
serial number of each engine fan cowl door, inspecting for cracking of
the hinge lock nuts of any affected door, and replacing the lock nuts
if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking
of the hinge lock nuts, which could result in separation of the hinge
from the fan cowl door, in-flight loss of the door, and consequent
damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact the
following:
For Airbus service information contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
For Goodrich service information contact Goodrich Aerostructures,
850 Lagoon Drive, Chula Vista, California, 91910-2098; telephone: 619-
691-2719; email: jan.lewis@goodrich.com; Internet: https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1991; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-1405;
fax: 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-1991;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-251-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0276, dated December 19, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model
A318-111 and -112 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, and -115 airplanes;
Model A320-214 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -
213 airplanes. The MCAI states:
In-service findings have been reported of cracked cadmium plated
lock nuts. This cracking occurs shortly after installation.
Investigation results attribute the cause to an improper
manufacturing procedure of the nuts. It was determined that the
affected batch of lock nuts was used on the fan cowl to attach
hinges to the cowl doors on CFM56-5B engines only.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to separation of
the hinge from the fan cowl door, possibly resulting in in-flight
loss of a fan cowl door, with consequent damage to the aeroplane
and/or injury to persons on the ground.
For the reasons describes above, this [EASA] AD required
identification of the affected fan cowl doors, a one-time inspection
of the fan cowl door hinge nuts and, depending on findings,
replacement of the affected nuts.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1991.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-71-1062, including Appendix
01, dated July 28, 2014. Goodrich Aerostructures has issued Service
Bulletin RA32071-151, dated June 11, 2014. The service information
describes procedures for inspection of the hinge nuts of the fan cowl
door, and replacement if necessary. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
[[Page 38037]]
in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the
State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced
above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of these same type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 437 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $74,290, or $170 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2015-1991; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
251-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 17, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
(1) Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes.
(2) Airbus Model A319-111, -112, and -115 airplanes.
(3) Airbus Model A320-214 airplanes.
(4) Airbus Model A321-111, -112, -211, 212, and -213 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of cracked cadmium-plated lock
nuts that attach the hinge to the fan cowl door. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct cracking of the hinge lock nuts, which
could result in separation of the hinge from the fan cowl door, the
in-flight loss of the door, and consequent damage to the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspect To Determine Serial Number
Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD: Inspect to
determine if any fan cowl door has a serial number 10029001 through
11092003 inclusive, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-71-1062, dated July 28,
2014; or Goodrich Aerostructures Service Bulletin RA32071-151, dated
June 11, 2014. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of the inspection required by this paragraph,
provided those records can be relied upon for that purpose and the
serial number can be positively identified by that review.
(h) Inspection and Replacement
For any fan cowl door having any serial number identified in
paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the hinge lock
nuts of the door, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-71-1062, dated July 28, 2014; or
Goodrich Aerostructures Service Bulletin RA32071-151, dated June 11,
2014. If any crack is found, before further flight, replace each
cracked hinge lock nut, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-71-1062, dated July 28,
2014; or Goodrich Aerostructures Service Bulletin RA32071-151, dated
June 11, 2014.
(i) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone: 425-227-1405; fax: 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective
[[Page 38038]]
actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0276, dated December 19,
2014, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-1991.
(2) For Airbus service information contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) For Goodrich service information contact Goodrich
Aerostructures, 850 Lagoon Drive, Chula Vista, California, 91910-
2098; telephone: 619-691-2719; email: jan.lewis@goodrich.com;
Internet: https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
(4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24, 2015.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-16165 Filed 7-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P