Regulations Governing United States Savings Bonds, 37559-37562 [2015-16278]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
C. Information Identifying the Person
Submitting the Comment
Please note that your name, contact
information, and other information
identifying you will be posted on https://
www.regulations.gov if you include that
information in the body of your
comments. For electronic comments
submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov, FDA will post the
body of your comment on https://
www.regulations.gov along with your
State/province and country (if
provided), the name of your
representative (if any), and the category
identifying you (e.g., individual,
consumer, academic, industry). For
written submissions submitted to the
Division of Dockets Management, FDA
will post the body of your comments on
https://www.regulations.gov, but you can
put your name and/or contact
information on a separate cover sheet
and not in the body of your comments.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–16151 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
receipt, and enables the Department to
make them available to the public.
Comments submitted electronically
through the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site can be viewed by other
commenters and interested members of
the public.
Mail: Send to Department of the
Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
Attn: Theodore Simms, 401 14th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20227–0001. In
general, Treasury will post all
comments to https://www.regulations.gov
without change, including any business
or personal information provided, such
as names, addresses, email addresses, or
telephone numbers. Treasury will also
make such comments available for
public inspection and copying. You can
make an appointment to inspect
comments by telephoning (202) 504–
3710. All comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, will be part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure.
You should only submit information
that you wish to make publicly
available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
Theodore C. Simms II, Senior Attorney,
202–504–3710 or Theodore.Simms@
fiscal.treasury.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fiscal Service
I. Background
31 CFR Parts 315, 353, and 360
The Department of the Treasury has
issued savings bonds since 1935 to raise
funds for the operation of the Federal
government, and to encourage savings
by small investors. From the beginning
of the savings bond program, savings
bonds have been registered securities.
Treasury has authorized several forms of
registration, including registration to
individuals, co-owners, fiduciaries,
institutions, and beneficiaries. See 31
CFR 315.7, 353.7, and 360.6. Savings
bonds generally are not transferrable
and are payable only to the registered
owner, except as described in Treasury
regulations. See 31 CFR 315.15, 353.15,
and 360.15. Detailed regulations
describe when payment will be made to
a person or entity that is not the
registered owner.
Ownership of a savings bond is
determined by Treasury’s savings bond
regulations. Federal and state courts,
including the United States Supreme
Court, have upheld these ownership
rights against challenges by parties
asserting claims under state law. See,
e.g., Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663 (1962).
The rights of registered owners and
others under Treasury regulations
persist even for bonds that matured
years ago, because Treasury does not
[Docket No.: FISCAL–2015–0002]
RIN 1530–AA11
Regulations Governing United States
Savings Bonds
Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The United States Department
of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service, is proposing regulations
governing United States savings bonds
to address certain state escheat claims.
DATES: Comment due date: August 17,
2015.
SUMMARY:
The Bureau of the Fiscal
Service invites comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be
submitted through one of the following
methods:
Electronic Submission of Comments:
Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37559
require owners to redeem their paper
savings bonds by a certain date.
In some cases, Treasury regulations
determine who is entitled to payment
based on state law. Treasury may look
to state probate law, for example, to
determine who is entitled to payment
for savings bonds in a decedent’s estate.
See 31 CFR 315.71, 353.71, and 360.71.
Treasury may also recognize certain
state judicial proceedings that require
payment to creditors, divorced spouses,
and other claimants specifically listed
in the regulations. See 31 CFR part 315,
subpart E; Part 353, subpart E; part 360,
subpart E. The touchstone for these
claims, however, is Treasury’s savings
bond regulations.
Since at least 1952, Treasury has
acknowledged circumstances when it
will recognize a state’s claim of title to
savings bonds based on a judgment of
escheat. ‘‘Escheat’’ describes a state’s
claim to property that has no owner.
Many state probate laws allow a state to
escheat the property of a person who
dies without a will and without heirs.
Treasury regulations do not specifically
mention escheat, but they do provide
that Treasury will pay a person entitled
to the estate of a deceased savings bond
owner in specified circumstances. When
these circumstances are met, Treasury
will pay a state that has title to savings
bonds in the estate of a deceased owner.
Like all claimants, the state must
present the bonds to Treasury or
otherwise meet Treasury’s requirements
for payment.
In recent years, states have submitted
escheat claims to Treasury for savings
bonds based on state unclaimed
property laws, when there is no
evidence that the savings bond owner
has died. The first claims came from
states whose escheat laws purported to
give them custody, but not title, to
certain unredeemed savings bonds. In
2012, the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld
Treasury’s position that states are not
entitled to payment for savings bonds
held only in their custody, because such
claims interfere with the rights of
registered owners and others under
Treasury regulations. New Jersey v. U.S.
Dept. of Treasury, 684 F.3d 382 (3rd Cir.
2012).
More recently, the State of Kansas
submitted an escheat claim based upon
a state court judgment that purported to
convey title over certain unredeemed
savings bonds. Kansas sought to redeem
savings bonds in its possession, which
had been turned over to the state as
unclaimed property, and to redeem a
much larger class of savings bonds that
it did not possess. In this class are
matured, unredeemed savings bonds
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37560
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
that were registered to an owner with an
address in Kansas, generally more than
thirty years ago. Kansas cannot identify
who owns these bonds, where the
owners currently reside, or whether the
owners intend to redeem their bonds in
the future. The physical bonds
themselves may be in their owners’
possession. Kansas asserted that
Treasury was bound to accept its claim
because the state court judgment was a
valid judicial proceeding, citing 31 CFR
315.20.
The savings bond regulations do not
require Treasury to recognize the Kansas
escheat judgment. However, Treasury
does acknowledge that a savings bond
can be abandoned, with no one entitled
to payment under Treasury regulations.
Treasury agreed to redeem the savings
bonds that Kansas possessed using
Treasury’s waiver authority under 31
CFR 315.90, after reviewing evidence
showing that the bonds had been
abandoned, and determining that
redemption would not impair any
existing rights or subject the United
States to any substantial expense or
liability. In addition to other facts
presented by the state, Kansas’s
possession of the bonds was evidence of
abandonment, as well as a guarantee
that no one else could submit the bonds
for payment.
Treasury did not redeem the broad
class of savings bonds that Kansas did
not possess. Because Treasury
regulations do not require a savings
bond owner to redeem bonds by a
certain date, a bond is not abandoned
merely because it has not been
redeemed. Treasury’s standard
procedures for redeeming savings bonds
allow the registered owner to present a
matured bond for payment at any time,
irrespective of state law. Recognizing
Kansas’s escheat claim to bonds that it
does not possess, and cannot establish
are abandoned, would impair the rights
of registered owners and others under
Treasury regulations, and expose
Treasury to claims for double payment.
Kansas sued Treasury in the United
States Court of Federal Claims, seeking
payment for all matured, unredeemed
savings bonds with registration
addresses in Kansas that were issued
between 1935 and 1974, as well as other
relief. At issue in the ongoing litigation
is whether Treasury’s savings bond
regulations at 31 CFR 315.20 require
Treasury to recognize the Kansas
escheat judgment. Although the
regulations do not require Treasury to
recognize a state escheat judgment for
unclaimed property, especially a
judgment that interferes with existing
rights, Treasury is proposing to amend
31 CFR 315.20 and other sections to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
address issues that arise from state
escheat claims.
II. This Proposed Rule
Treasury proposes to amend its
savings bond regulations to explicitly
address state escheat claims to
unclaimed savings bonds. The
amendments would be published at part
315, subparts E and O; part 353,
subparts E and O; and part 360, subparts
E and M.
One group of amendments further
defines the scope of the judicial
proceedings covered by subpart E in
parts 315, 353, and 360. The proposed
amendments explicitly provide that
escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under subpart E.
A second group of amendments
establishes a new procedure for states to
submit escheat claims under their
unclaimed property statutes for
Treasury’s consideration. The proposed
regulations provide Treasury with
discretion to recognize an escheat
judgment that purports to vest a state
with title to a definitive savings bond
that has reached the final extended
maturity date and is in the state’s
possession, when the state presents
evidence satisfactory to Treasury that
the bond has been abandoned by all
persons entitled to payment under
Treasury regulations. Escheat judgments
that purport to vest a state with title to
bonds that the state does not possess
will not be recognized.
The proposed regulations would
require a state to demonstrate, at a
minimum, that it made reasonable
efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the
face of the bond and all persons who
may have an interest in the bond. The
state must also demonstrate that those
persons had an opportunity to be heard
before the escheat judgment was
entered. The steps normally required in
a state escheat proceeding may be
adequate to establish abandonment, but
Treasury is not bound by these
proceedings. Because state escheat rules
may vary and state escheat proceedings
are often uncontested, Treasury reserves
the right to require additional evidence
of abandonment. Under the proposed
regulations, if a state seeks to redeem
bonds in its possession to which it has
obtained title via escheat, the
proceeding must have provided notice
and an opportunity to be heard to those
who the state claims have abandoned
their right to payment. Treasury may
also require a bond of indemnity, with
or without surety, in any case for the
protection of the United States’
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
interests. See 31 CFR 315.91, 353.91,
and 360.91.
The proposed regulations make
explicit that Treasury will not recognize
escheat judgments that convey custody,
but not title, to a state. This principle is
well established in Federal case law and
has been incorporated into the proposed
regulation.
Treasury proposes to recognize
escheat judgments regarding bonds in a
state’s possession as a discretionary
matter, because the breadth of state
escheat laws is not within Treasury’s
control. In exercising discretion,
Treasury will consider whether a state’s
escheat claim impairs any existing
rights under Treasury regulations and
will assess the risk to Treasury of
duplicative payment claims. Requiring
states to possess the bonds that they
seek to redeem protects these interests,
and enables Treasury to locate records
of the bonds for which the state seeks
payment.
The proposed regulations on escheat
claims to unclaimed property do not
apply when a state claims title to a
definitive savings bond as the heir to a
deceased owner. Treasury has long
recognized circumstances in which a
state may obtain title to a savings bond
by escheat when the bond owner has
died. These escheat claims will be
considered under existing savings bond
regulations that pertain to the estates of
deceased owners, co-owners, and
beneficiaries. See 31 CFR part 315,
subpart L; part 353, subpart L; and part
360, subpart L.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Because this proposed rule relates to
United States securities, which are
contracts between Treasury and the
owner of the security, this rulemaking
falls within the contract exception to the
APA at 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). Treasury,
however, is voluntarily seeking public
comment to assist the agency in giving
full consideration to the matters
discussed in the proposed rule.
B. Congressional Review Act (CRA).
This proposed rule is not a major rule
pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq. It is not expected to lead to any of
the results listed in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
proposed rule may take immediate
effect after we submit a copy of it to
Congress and the Comptroller General.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
There is no new collection of
information contained in this proposed
rule that would be subject to the PRA,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Under the PRA,
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
an agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., does not apply to this
rulemaking because, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(2), issuance does not
require notice and opportunity for
public comment. Nonetheless, this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This
rulemaking primarily affects states and
is not expected to have a direct impact
on any small entities. The proposed rule
formally states Treasury’s existing
interpretation of the savings bond
regulations as they apply to escheat
claims, and proposes a new procedure
through which states can submit claims
to Treasury. Treasury is voluntarily
seeking public comment in order to give
thorough consideration to a range of
views on state escheat claims before
issuing the final rule.
E. Executive Order 12866.
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action pursuant to Executive
Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 315
Government securities, Savings
bonds.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 353
Government securities, Savings
bonds.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 360
Government securities, Savings
bonds.
Accordingly, for the reasons set out in
the preamble, the Department of the
Treasury proposes to amend 31 CFR
part 315 subparts E and O; part 353
subparts E and O; and part 360 subparts
E and M to read as follows:
PART 315—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING U.S. SAVINGS BONDS,
SERIES A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, AND
K, AND U.S. SAVINGS NOTES
1. The authority citation for part 315
continues to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3105 and 5 U.S.C.
301.
2. Amend § 315.20 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 315.20
General
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Department of the Treasury
will recognize a claim against an owner
of a savings bond and conflicting claims
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
of ownership of, or interest in, a bond
between coowners or between the
registered owner and the beneficiary, if
established by valid, judicial
proceedings specifically listed in this
subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section
315.23 specifies the evidence required
to establish the validity of the judicial
proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Redesignate subpart O as subpart P
and add a new subpart O to read as
follows:
Subpart O—Escheat and Unclaimed
Property Claims by States
Sec.
315.88 Payment to a State claiming title to
abandoned bonds.
§ 315.88 Payment to a State claiming title
to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the
Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that
purports to vest a State with title to a
definitive savings bond that has reached
the final extended maturity date and is
in the State’s possession, when the State
presents evidence satisfactory to
Treasury that the bond has been
abandoned by all persons entitled to
payment under Treasury regulations. A
State claiming title to a definitive
savings bond as the heir to a deceased
owner must comply with the
requirements of subpart L, and not this
section. Treasury will not recognize an
escheat judgment that purports to vest a
State with title to a bond that has not
reached its final extended maturity date.
Treasury also will not recognize an
escheat judgment that purports to vest a
State with title to a bond that the State
does not possess, or a judgment that
purports to grant the State custody of a
bond, but not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a
State requesting payment under this
section must demonstrate to Treasury’s
satisfaction that it made reasonable
efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the
face of the bond and all persons who
may have an interest in the bond, and
that those persons had an opportunity to
be heard before the escheat judgment
was entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment
to a State claiming title under this
section fulfills the United States’
obligations to the same extent as if
payment had been made to the
registered owner.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37561
PART 353—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING DEFINITIVE UNITED
STATES SAVINGS BONDS, SERIES EE
AND HH
1. The authority for this part
continues to read:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 12 U.S.C. 391; 31
U.S.C. 3105, 3125.
2. Amend § 353.20 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 353.20
General .
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Department of the Treasury
will recognize a claim against an owner
of a savings bond and conflicting claims
of ownership of, or interest in, a bond
between coowners or between the
registered owner and the beneficiary, if
established by valid, judicial
proceedings specifically listed in this
subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section
353.23 specifies the evidence required
to establish the validity of the judicial
proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Redesignate subpart O as subpart P
and add a new subpart O to read as
follows:
Subpart O—Escheat and Unclaimed
Property Claims by States
Sec.
353.88 Payment to a State claiming title to
abandoned bonds.
§ 353.88 Payment to a State claiming title
to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the
Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that
purports to vest a State with title to a
definitive savings bond that has reached
final maturity and is in the State’s
possession, when the State presents
evidence satisfactory to Treasury that
the bond has been abandoned by all
persons entitled to payment under
Treasury regulations. A State claiming
title to a definitive savings bond as the
heir to a deceased owner must comply
with the requirements of subpart L, and
not this section. Treasury will not
recognize an escheat judgment that
purports to vest a State with title to a
bond that has not reached its final
maturity. Treasury also will not
recognize escheat judgments that
purport to vest a State with title to a
bond that the State does not possess, or
judgments that purport to grant the State
custody of a bond, but not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a
State requesting payment under this
section must demonstrate to Treasury’s
satisfaction that it made reasonable
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
37562
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the
face of the bond and all persons who
may have an interest in the bond, and
that those persons had an opportunity to
be heard before the escheat judgment
was entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment
to a State claiming title under this
section fulfills the United States’
obligations to the same extent as if
payment had been made to the
registered owner.
PART 360—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING DEFINITIVE UNITED
STATES SAVINGS BONDS, SERIES I
1. The authority for this part
continues to read:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 3105
and 3125.
2. Amend § 360.20 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 360.20
General
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Department of the Treasury
will recognize a claim against an owner
of a savings bond and conflicting claims
of ownership of, or interest in, a bond
between coowners or between the
registered owner and the beneficiary, if
established by valid, judicial
proceedings specifically listed in this
subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section
360.23 specifies the evidence required
to establish the validity of the judicial
proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Redesignate subpart M as subpart N
and add a new subpart M to read as
follows:
this part, and not this section. Treasury
will not recognize an escheat judgment
that purports to vest a State with title to
a bond that is still earning interest.
Treasury also will not recognize escheat
judgments that purport to vest a State
with title to a bond that the State does
not possess, or judgments that purport
to grant the State custody of a bond, but
not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a
State requesting payment under this
section must demonstrate to Treasury’s
satisfaction that it made reasonable
efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the
face of the bond and all persons who
may have an interest in the bond, and
that those persons had an opportunity to
be heard before the escheat judgment
was entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment
to a State claiming title under this
section fulfills the United States’
obligations to the same extent as if
payment had been made to the
registered owner.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
David A. Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–16278 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0332]
RIN 1625–AA00
Subpart M—Escheat and Unclaimed
Property Claims by States
Safety zone; Allegheny River Between
Mile 0.0 and 1.4; Pittsburgh, PA
Sec.
360.77 Payment to a State claiming title to
abandoned bonds.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 360.77 Payment to a State claiming title
to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the
Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that
purports to vest a State with title to a
definitive savings bond that has stopped
earning interest and is in the State’s
possession, when the State presents
evidence satisfactory to Treasury that
the bond has been abandoned by all
persons entitled to payment under
Treasury regulations. A State claiming
title to a definitive savings bond as the
heir to a deceased owner must comply
with the requirements of subpart L of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone on
the Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4
from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August
8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. This safety
zone is needed to protect persons
participating in the Pittsburgh
Triathlon. Entry into this zone will be
prohibited to all vessels, mariners, and
persons unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Pittsburgh or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 16, 2015.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone (412) 221–0807, email
Jennifer.L.Haggins@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl F.
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
SAR Search and Rescue
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37559-37562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16278]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
31 CFR Parts 315, 353, and 360
[Docket No.: FISCAL-2015-0002]
RIN 1530-AA11
Regulations Governing United States Savings Bonds
AGENCY: Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the
Fiscal Service, is proposing regulations governing United States
savings bonds to address certain state escheat claims.
DATES: Comment due date: August 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The Bureau of the Fiscal Service invites comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be submitted through one of the following
methods:
Electronic Submission of Comments: Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Electronic submission of comments allows
the commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures
timely receipt, and enables the Department to make them available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the https://www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Mail: Send to Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service, Attn: Theodore Simms, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20227-0001. In general, Treasury will post all comments to https://www.regulations.gov without change, including any business or personal
information provided, such as names, addresses, email addresses, or
telephone numbers. Treasury will also make such comments available for
public inspection and copying. You can make an appointment to inspect
comments by telephoning (202) 504-3710. All comments received,
including attachments and other supporting materials, will be part of
the public record and subject to public disclosure. You should only
submit information that you wish to make publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore C. Simms II, Senior Attorney,
202-504-3710 or Theodore.Simms@fiscal.treasury.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of the Treasury has issued savings bonds since 1935
to raise funds for the operation of the Federal government, and to
encourage savings by small investors. From the beginning of the savings
bond program, savings bonds have been registered securities. Treasury
has authorized several forms of registration, including registration to
individuals, co-owners, fiduciaries, institutions, and beneficiaries.
See 31 CFR 315.7, 353.7, and 360.6. Savings bonds generally are not
transferrable and are payable only to the registered owner, except as
described in Treasury regulations. See 31 CFR 315.15, 353.15, and
360.15. Detailed regulations describe when payment will be made to a
person or entity that is not the registered owner.
Ownership of a savings bond is determined by Treasury's savings
bond regulations. Federal and state courts, including the United States
Supreme Court, have upheld these ownership rights against challenges by
parties asserting claims under state law. See, e.g., Free v. Bland, 369
U.S. 663 (1962). The rights of registered owners and others under
Treasury regulations persist even for bonds that matured years ago,
because Treasury does not require owners to redeem their paper savings
bonds by a certain date.
In some cases, Treasury regulations determine who is entitled to
payment based on state law. Treasury may look to state probate law, for
example, to determine who is entitled to payment for savings bonds in a
decedent's estate. See 31 CFR 315.71, 353.71, and 360.71. Treasury may
also recognize certain state judicial proceedings that require payment
to creditors, divorced spouses, and other claimants specifically listed
in the regulations. See 31 CFR part 315, subpart E; Part 353, subpart
E; part 360, subpart E. The touchstone for these claims, however, is
Treasury's savings bond regulations.
Since at least 1952, Treasury has acknowledged circumstances when
it will recognize a state's claim of title to savings bonds based on a
judgment of escheat. ``Escheat'' describes a state's claim to property
that has no owner. Many state probate laws allow a state to escheat the
property of a person who dies without a will and without heirs.
Treasury regulations do not specifically mention escheat, but they do
provide that Treasury will pay a person entitled to the estate of a
deceased savings bond owner in specified circumstances. When these
circumstances are met, Treasury will pay a state that has title to
savings bonds in the estate of a deceased owner. Like all claimants,
the state must present the bonds to Treasury or otherwise meet
Treasury's requirements for payment.
In recent years, states have submitted escheat claims to Treasury
for savings bonds based on state unclaimed property laws, when there is
no evidence that the savings bond owner has died. The first claims came
from states whose escheat laws purported to give them custody, but not
title, to certain unredeemed savings bonds. In 2012, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld Treasury's position that
states are not entitled to payment for savings bonds held only in their
custody, because such claims interfere with the rights of registered
owners and others under Treasury regulations. New Jersey v. U.S. Dept.
of Treasury, 684 F.3d 382 (3rd Cir. 2012).
More recently, the State of Kansas submitted an escheat claim based
upon a state court judgment that purported to convey title over certain
unredeemed savings bonds. Kansas sought to redeem savings bonds in its
possession, which had been turned over to the state as unclaimed
property, and to redeem a much larger class of savings bonds that it
did not possess. In this class are matured, unredeemed savings bonds
[[Page 37560]]
that were registered to an owner with an address in Kansas, generally
more than thirty years ago. Kansas cannot identify who owns these
bonds, where the owners currently reside, or whether the owners intend
to redeem their bonds in the future. The physical bonds themselves may
be in their owners' possession. Kansas asserted that Treasury was bound
to accept its claim because the state court judgment was a valid
judicial proceeding, citing 31 CFR 315.20.
The savings bond regulations do not require Treasury to recognize
the Kansas escheat judgment. However, Treasury does acknowledge that a
savings bond can be abandoned, with no one entitled to payment under
Treasury regulations. Treasury agreed to redeem the savings bonds that
Kansas possessed using Treasury's waiver authority under 31 CFR 315.90,
after reviewing evidence showing that the bonds had been abandoned, and
determining that redemption would not impair any existing rights or
subject the United States to any substantial expense or liability. In
addition to other facts presented by the state, Kansas's possession of
the bonds was evidence of abandonment, as well as a guarantee that no
one else could submit the bonds for payment.
Treasury did not redeem the broad class of savings bonds that
Kansas did not possess. Because Treasury regulations do not require a
savings bond owner to redeem bonds by a certain date, a bond is not
abandoned merely because it has not been redeemed. Treasury's standard
procedures for redeeming savings bonds allow the registered owner to
present a matured bond for payment at any time, irrespective of state
law. Recognizing Kansas's escheat claim to bonds that it does not
possess, and cannot establish are abandoned, would impair the rights of
registered owners and others under Treasury regulations, and expose
Treasury to claims for double payment.
Kansas sued Treasury in the United States Court of Federal Claims,
seeking payment for all matured, unredeemed savings bonds with
registration addresses in Kansas that were issued between 1935 and
1974, as well as other relief. At issue in the ongoing litigation is
whether Treasury's savings bond regulations at 31 CFR 315.20 require
Treasury to recognize the Kansas escheat judgment. Although the
regulations do not require Treasury to recognize a state escheat
judgment for unclaimed property, especially a judgment that interferes
with existing rights, Treasury is proposing to amend 31 CFR 315.20 and
other sections to address issues that arise from state escheat claims.
II. This Proposed Rule
Treasury proposes to amend its savings bond regulations to
explicitly address state escheat claims to unclaimed savings bonds. The
amendments would be published at part 315, subparts E and O; part 353,
subparts E and O; and part 360, subparts E and M.
One group of amendments further defines the scope of the judicial
proceedings covered by subpart E in parts 315, 353, and 360. The
proposed amendments explicitly provide that escheat proceedings will
not be recognized under subpart E.
A second group of amendments establishes a new procedure for states
to submit escheat claims under their unclaimed property statutes for
Treasury's consideration. The proposed regulations provide Treasury
with discretion to recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest
a state with title to a definitive savings bond that has reached the
final extended maturity date and is in the state's possession, when the
state presents evidence satisfactory to Treasury that the bond has been
abandoned by all persons entitled to payment under Treasury
regulations. Escheat judgments that purport to vest a state with title
to bonds that the state does not possess will not be recognized.
The proposed regulations would require a state to demonstrate, at a
minimum, that it made reasonable efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat proceeding to all persons listed on
the face of the bond and all persons who may have an interest in the
bond. The state must also demonstrate that those persons had an
opportunity to be heard before the escheat judgment was entered. The
steps normally required in a state escheat proceeding may be adequate
to establish abandonment, but Treasury is not bound by these
proceedings. Because state escheat rules may vary and state escheat
proceedings are often uncontested, Treasury reserves the right to
require additional evidence of abandonment. Under the proposed
regulations, if a state seeks to redeem bonds in its possession to
which it has obtained title via escheat, the proceeding must have
provided notice and an opportunity to be heard to those who the state
claims have abandoned their right to payment. Treasury may also require
a bond of indemnity, with or without surety, in any case for the
protection of the United States' interests. See 31 CFR 315.91, 353.91,
and 360.91.
The proposed regulations make explicit that Treasury will not
recognize escheat judgments that convey custody, but not title, to a
state. This principle is well established in Federal case law and has
been incorporated into the proposed regulation.
Treasury proposes to recognize escheat judgments regarding bonds in
a state's possession as a discretionary matter, because the breadth of
state escheat laws is not within Treasury's control. In exercising
discretion, Treasury will consider whether a state's escheat claim
impairs any existing rights under Treasury regulations and will assess
the risk to Treasury of duplicative payment claims. Requiring states to
possess the bonds that they seek to redeem protects these interests,
and enables Treasury to locate records of the bonds for which the state
seeks payment.
The proposed regulations on escheat claims to unclaimed property do
not apply when a state claims title to a definitive savings bond as the
heir to a deceased owner. Treasury has long recognized circumstances in
which a state may obtain title to a savings bond by escheat when the
bond owner has died. These escheat claims will be considered under
existing savings bond regulations that pertain to the estates of
deceased owners, co-owners, and beneficiaries. See 31 CFR part 315,
subpart L; part 353, subpart L; and part 360, subpart L.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Because this proposed rule relates to United States securities,
which are contracts between Treasury and the owner of the security,
this rulemaking falls within the contract exception to the APA at 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(2). Treasury, however, is voluntarily seeking public
comment to assist the agency in giving full consideration to the
matters discussed in the proposed rule.
B. Congressional Review Act (CRA).
This proposed rule is not a major rule pursuant to the CRA, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq. It is not expected to lead to any of the results
listed in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This proposed rule may take immediate effect
after we submit a copy of it to Congress and the Comptroller General.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
There is no new collection of information contained in this
proposed rule that would be subject to the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Under the PRA,
[[Page 37561]]
an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
control number.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., does not
apply to this rulemaking because, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2),
issuance does not require notice and opportunity for public comment.
Nonetheless, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rulemaking
primarily affects states and is not expected to have a direct impact on
any small entities. The proposed rule formally states Treasury's
existing interpretation of the savings bond regulations as they apply
to escheat claims, and proposes a new procedure through which states
can submit claims to Treasury. Treasury is voluntarily seeking public
comment in order to give thorough consideration to a range of views on
state escheat claims before issuing the final rule.
E. Executive Order 12866.
This rule is not a significant regulatory action pursuant to
Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 315
Government securities, Savings bonds.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 353
Government securities, Savings bonds.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 360
Government securities, Savings bonds.
Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the preamble, the
Department of the Treasury proposes to amend 31 CFR part 315 subparts E
and O; part 353 subparts E and O; and part 360 subparts E and M to read
as follows:
PART 315--REGULATIONS GOVERNING U.S. SAVINGS BONDS, SERIES A, B, C,
D, E, F, G, H, J, AND K, AND U.S. SAVINGS NOTES
0
1. The authority citation for part 315 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3105 and 5 U.S.C. 301.
0
2. Amend Sec. 315.20 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 315.20 General
* * * * *
(b) The Department of the Treasury will recognize a claim against
an owner of a savings bond and conflicting claims of ownership of, or
interest in, a bond between coowners or between the registered owner
and the beneficiary, if established by valid, judicial proceedings
specifically listed in this subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section 315.23 specifies the evidence
required to establish the validity of the judicial proceedings.
* * * * *
0
3. Redesignate subpart O as subpart P and add a new subpart O to read
as follows:
Subpart O--Escheat and Unclaimed Property Claims by States
Sec.
315.88 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds.
Sec. 315.88 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title
to a definitive savings bond that has reached the final extended
maturity date and is in the State's possession, when the State presents
evidence satisfactory to Treasury that the bond has been abandoned by
all persons entitled to payment under Treasury regulations. A State
claiming title to a definitive savings bond as the heir to a deceased
owner must comply with the requirements of subpart L, and not this
section. Treasury will not recognize an escheat judgment that purports
to vest a State with title to a bond that has not reached its final
extended maturity date. Treasury also will not recognize an escheat
judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a bond that the
State does not possess, or a judgment that purports to grant the State
custody of a bond, but not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a State requesting payment under
this section must demonstrate to Treasury's satisfaction that it made
reasonable efforts to provide actual and constructive notice of the
escheat proceeding to all persons listed on the face of the bond and
all persons who may have an interest in the bond, and that those
persons had an opportunity to be heard before the escheat judgment was
entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment to a State claiming title
under this section fulfills the United States' obligations to the same
extent as if payment had been made to the registered owner.
PART 353--REGULATIONS GOVERNING DEFINITIVE UNITED STATES SAVINGS
BONDS, SERIES EE AND HH
0
1. The authority for this part continues to read:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 12 U.S.C. 391; 31 U.S.C. 3105, 3125.
0
2. Amend Sec. 353.20 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 353.20 General .
* * * * *
(b) The Department of the Treasury will recognize a claim against
an owner of a savings bond and conflicting claims of ownership of, or
interest in, a bond between coowners or between the registered owner
and the beneficiary, if established by valid, judicial proceedings
specifically listed in this subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section 353.23 specifies the evidence
required to establish the validity of the judicial proceedings.
* * * * *
0
3. Redesignate subpart O as subpart P and add a new subpart O to read
as follows:
Subpart O--Escheat and Unclaimed Property Claims by States
Sec.
353.88 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds.
Sec. 353.88 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title
to a definitive savings bond that has reached final maturity and is in
the State's possession, when the State presents evidence satisfactory
to Treasury that the bond has been abandoned by all persons entitled to
payment under Treasury regulations. A State claiming title to a
definitive savings bond as the heir to a deceased owner must comply
with the requirements of subpart L, and not this section. Treasury will
not recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with
title to a bond that has not reached its final maturity. Treasury also
will not recognize escheat judgments that purport to vest a State with
title to a bond that the State does not possess, or judgments that
purport to grant the State custody of a bond, but not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a State requesting payment under
this section must demonstrate to Treasury's satisfaction that it made
reasonable
[[Page 37562]]
efforts to provide actual and constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the face of the bond and all
persons who may have an interest in the bond, and that those persons
had an opportunity to be heard before the escheat judgment was entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment to a State claiming title
under this section fulfills the United States' obligations to the same
extent as if payment had been made to the registered owner.
PART 360--REGULATIONS GOVERNING DEFINITIVE UNITED STATES SAVINGS
BONDS, SERIES I
0
1. The authority for this part continues to read:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 3105 and 3125.
0
2. Amend Sec. 360.20 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 360.20 General
* * * * *
(b) The Department of the Treasury will recognize a claim against
an owner of a savings bond and conflicting claims of ownership of, or
interest in, a bond between coowners or between the registered owner
and the beneficiary, if established by valid, judicial proceedings
specifically listed in this subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section 360.23 specifies the evidence
required to establish the validity of the judicial proceedings.
* * * * *
0
3. Redesignate subpart M as subpart N and add a new subpart M to read
as follows:
Subpart M--Escheat and Unclaimed Property Claims by States
Sec.
360.77 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds.
Sec. 360.77 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title
to a definitive savings bond that has stopped earning interest and is
in the State's possession, when the State presents evidence
satisfactory to Treasury that the bond has been abandoned by all
persons entitled to payment under Treasury regulations. A State
claiming title to a definitive savings bond as the heir to a deceased
owner must comply with the requirements of subpart L of this part, and
not this section. Treasury will not recognize an escheat judgment that
purports to vest a State with title to a bond that is still earning
interest. Treasury also will not recognize escheat judgments that
purport to vest a State with title to a bond that the State does not
possess, or judgments that purport to grant the State custody of a
bond, but not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a State requesting payment under
this section must demonstrate to Treasury's satisfaction that it made
reasonable efforts to provide actual and constructive notice of the
escheat proceeding to all persons listed on the face of the bond and
all persons who may have an interest in the bond, and that those
persons had an opportunity to be heard before the escheat judgment was
entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment to a State claiming title
under this section fulfills the United States' obligations to the same
extent as if payment had been made to the registered owner.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
David A. Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-16278 Filed 6-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P