Safety zone; Allegheny River Between Mile 0.0 and 1.4; Pittsburgh, PA, 37562-37565 [2015-16258]
Download as PDF
37562
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the
face of the bond and all persons who
may have an interest in the bond, and
that those persons had an opportunity to
be heard before the escheat judgment
was entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment
to a State claiming title under this
section fulfills the United States’
obligations to the same extent as if
payment had been made to the
registered owner.
PART 360—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING DEFINITIVE UNITED
STATES SAVINGS BONDS, SERIES I
1. The authority for this part
continues to read:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 3105
and 3125.
2. Amend § 360.20 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 360.20
General
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Department of the Treasury
will recognize a claim against an owner
of a savings bond and conflicting claims
of ownership of, or interest in, a bond
between coowners or between the
registered owner and the beneficiary, if
established by valid, judicial
proceedings specifically listed in this
subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be
recognized under this subpart. Section
360.23 specifies the evidence required
to establish the validity of the judicial
proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Redesignate subpart M as subpart N
and add a new subpart M to read as
follows:
this part, and not this section. Treasury
will not recognize an escheat judgment
that purports to vest a State with title to
a bond that is still earning interest.
Treasury also will not recognize escheat
judgments that purport to vest a State
with title to a bond that the State does
not possess, or judgments that purport
to grant the State custody of a bond, but
not title.
(b) Due Process. At a minimum, a
State requesting payment under this
section must demonstrate to Treasury’s
satisfaction that it made reasonable
efforts to provide actual and
constructive notice of the escheat
proceeding to all persons listed on the
face of the bond and all persons who
may have an interest in the bond, and
that those persons had an opportunity to
be heard before the escheat judgment
was entered.
(c) Fulfillment of Obligation. Payment
to a State claiming title under this
section fulfills the United States’
obligations to the same extent as if
payment had been made to the
registered owner.
Dated: June 26, 2015.
David A. Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–16278 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0332]
RIN 1625–AA00
Subpart M—Escheat and Unclaimed
Property Claims by States
Safety zone; Allegheny River Between
Mile 0.0 and 1.4; Pittsburgh, PA
Sec.
360.77 Payment to a State claiming title to
abandoned bonds.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 360.77 Payment to a State claiming title
to abandoned bonds.
(a) General. The Department of the
Treasury may, in its discretion,
recognize an escheat judgment that
purports to vest a State with title to a
definitive savings bond that has stopped
earning interest and is in the State’s
possession, when the State presents
evidence satisfactory to Treasury that
the bond has been abandoned by all
persons entitled to payment under
Treasury regulations. A State claiming
title to a definitive savings bond as the
heir to a deceased owner must comply
with the requirements of subpart L of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone on
the Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4
from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August
8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. This safety
zone is needed to protect persons
participating in the Pittsburgh
Triathlon. Entry into this zone will be
prohibited to all vessels, mariners, and
persons unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Pittsburgh or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 16, 2015.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone (412) 221–0807, email
Jennifer.L.Haggins@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl F.
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
SAR Search and Rescue
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2015–0332] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2015–0332) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard has a long history
working with local, state, and federal
agencies in areas to improve emergency
response, to prepare for events that call
for swift action, and to protect our
nation. The Coast Guard is proposing to
establish this safety zone on the waters
of the Allegheny River for the Pittsburgh
Triathlon. The marine event is
scheduled to take place from 5:45 a.m.
to 8:45 a.m. on August 8, 2015 and
August 9, 2015. This proposed rule is
necessary to protect the safety of the
participants, spectators, commercial
traffic, and the general public on the
navigable waters of the United States
during the event.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this
proposed rule are found in 33 U.S.C.
1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the
Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define safety zones. The purpose of this
proposed safety zone is to protect the
participants of the Pittsburgh Triathlon
during the swim portion of the event
from the hazards of other vessels in the
water.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is necessary to
establish a safety zone that will
encompass all waters of the Allegheny
River in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The
proposed safety zone regulations would
be enforced from approximately 5:45
a.m. to 8:45 a.m. for approximately 3
hours on August 8, 2015 and August 9,
2015. As proposed, the safety zone
would be a complete closure on the
Allegheny River from mile 0.0 to mile
1.4 from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on
August 8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. All
persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels participating in the
triathlon and those vessels enforcing the
areas, would be prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the proposed
safety zone area.
Persons and vessels may request
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
enforcement areas by contacting the
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh by
telephone at (412) 221–0807, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37563
within the enforcement areas is granted
by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or
a designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a
designated representative.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The temporary safety zone listed
in this proposed rule will restrict vessel
traffic from entering, transiting, or
anchoring within a portion of the
Allegheny River. The effect of this
proposed regulation will not be
significant for several reasons: (1) The
amount of time the Allegheny River will
be closed (2) the impacts on routine
navigation are expected to be minimal
because notifications to the marine
community will be made through local
notice to mariners (LNM) and broadcast
notice to mariners (BNM). Therefore,
these notifications will allow the public
to plan operations around the proposed
safety zone and its enforcement times.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
the Allegheny River from mile 0.0 to
mile 1.4 effective from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
37564
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
a.m. on August 8, 2015 and August 9,
2015. This proposed safety zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because this proposed rule will impede
navigational traffic for a short period of
time. Traffic in this area is almost
entirely limited to recreational vessels
and commercial towing vessels.
Notifications to the marine community
will be made through BNMs and
electronic mail. Notices of changes to
the proposed safety zone and scheduled
effective times and enforcement periods
will also be made. Deviation from the
proposed restrictions may be requested
from the COTP or designated
representative and will be considered
on a case-by-case basis.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rulemaking would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this
rulemaking does not have implications
for federalism.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary
safety zone. The safety zone will be on
the Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4
from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August
8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. This action
is necessary to protect persons and
property during the Pittsburgh
Triathlon. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. A new temporary § 165.T08–0332 is
added to subpart F, under the
■
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
[FR Doc. 2015–16258 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
completely replace and supersede the
prior rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Judicial Officer Department,
United States Postal Service, 2101
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington,
VA 22201–3078.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Associate Judicial Officer Gary E.
Shapiro, (703) 812–1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rules
governing the Judicial Officer’s role
regarding Postal Service debarments are
set forth in 39 CFR part 957. The
proposed rules would completely
replace the former rules of this part.
In 2007, the Postal Service changed its
procurement regulations regarding
suspension and debarment from
contracting. See 72 FR 58252 (October
15, 2007). Whereas prior to that change,
the Judicial Officer conducted hearings
and rendered final agency decisions
regarding suspension and debarment
from contracting, the revised
procurement regulations at 39 CFR
601.113 eliminated any role of the
Judicial Officer from suspensions, and
reserved final agency action regarding
debarments to the Vice President,
Supply Management. The remaining
role of the Judicial Officer relative to
debarment from contracting is set forth
in paragraphs (g)(2) and (h)(2) of
§ 601.113. Those paragraphs provide
that the Vice President, Supply
Management, may request the Judicial
Officer to conduct fact-finding hearings
to resolve questions of material facts
involving a debarment, and will
consider those findings when deciding
the matter. Under paragraph (h)(2) of
§ 601.113, fact-finding hearings will be
governed by rules of procedure
promulgated by the Judicial Officer.
These rules of procedure satisfy that
requirement.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 957
POSTAL SERVICE
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government contracts.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated,
the Postal Service proposes to revise 39
CFR part 957 to read as follows:
undesignated center heading Eighth
Coast Guard District, to read as follows:
§ 165.T08–0332 Safety Zone; Allegheny
River between mile 0.0 and 1.4; Pittsburgh,
PA.
(a) Locations. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters on the
Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4.
(b) Effective date and time. The safety
zone listed in section (a) is effective
from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August
8, 2015 and August 9, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this area is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Pittsburgh or
a designated representative.
(2) Spectator vessels may safely
transit outside the safety zones at a
minimum safe speed, but may not
anchor, block, loiter, or impede
participants or official patrol vessels.
(3) Vessels requiring entry into or
passage through the safety zones must
request permission from the COTP
Pittsburgh or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
by telephone at (412) 412–0807.
(4) All vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the COTP Pittsburgh and
designated personnel. Designated
personnel include commissioned,
warrant, and petty officers of the U.S.
Coast Guard.
(d) Informational Broadcasts: The
Captain of the Port, Pittsburgh or a
designated representative will inform
the public through broadcast notices to
mariners (BNM) of the effective period
for the safety zone and of any changes
in the effective period, enforcement
times, or size of the safety zones.
Dated: June 10, 2015.
L. N. Weaver,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Pittsburgh.
39 CFR Part 957
Rules of Practice in Proceedings
Relative to Debarment From
Contracting
PART 957—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO
DEBARMENT FROM CONTRACTING
Postal Service.
Proposed rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document requests
comments regarding a revision of the
rules for proceedings in which the
Judicial Officer Department conducts
fact-finding relative to debarments. The
revised rules of procedure would
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Sec.
957.1
957.2
957.3
957.4
957.5
957.6
957.7
957.8
PO 00000
Authority for rules.
Scope of rules.
Definitions.
Authority of the Hearing Officer.
Case initiation.
Filing documents for the record.
Failure to appear at the hearing.
Hearings.
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37565
957.9 Appearances.
957.10 Conduct of the hearing.
957.11 Witness fees.
957.12 Transcript.
957.13 Proposed findings of fact.
957.14 Findings of fact.
957.15 Computation of time.
957.16 Official record.
957.17 Public information.
957.18 Ex parte communications.
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401.
§ 957.1
Authority for rules.
The rules in this part are issued by the
Judicial Officer of the Postal Service
pursuant to authority delegated by the
Postmaster General (39 U.S.C. 204, 401).
§ 957.2
Scope of rules.
The rules in this part apply to
proceedings initiated pursuant to
paragraphs (g)(2) or (h)(2) of § 601.113 of
this chapter.
§ 957.3
Definitions.
(a) Vice President means the Vice
President, Supply Management, or the
Vice President’s representative for the
purpose of carrying out the provisions
of § 601.113 of this chapter.
(b) General Counsel includes the
Postal Service’s General Counsel and
any designated representative within
the Office of the General Counsel.
(c) Judicial Officer includes the Postal
Service’s Judicial Officer, Associate
Judicial Officer, and Acting Judicial
Officer.
(d) Debarment has the meaning given
by paragraph (b)(2) of § 601.113 of this
chapter.
(e) Respondent means any individual,
firm or other entity which has been
served a written notice of proposed
debarment pursuant to paragraph (h), or
which previously has been debarred, as
provided in paragraph (g)(2) of
§ 601.113 of this chapter.
(f) Hearing Officer means the judge
assigned to the case by the Judicial
Officer. The Hearing Officer may be the
Judicial Officer, Associate Judicial
Officer, Administrative Law Judge or an
Administrative Judge who is a member
of the Postal Service Board of Contract
Appeals.
(g) Recorder means the Recorder of
the Judicial Officer Department of the
United States Postal Service, 2101
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington,
VA 22201–3078. The Recorder’s
telephone number is (703) 812–1900,
fax number is (703) 812–1901, and the
Judicial Officer’s Web site is https://
www.about.usps.com/who-we-are/
judicial/welcome.htm.
§ 957.4
Authority of the Hearing Officer.
The Hearing Officer’s authority
includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37562-37565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16258]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-0332]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety zone; Allegheny River Between Mile 0.0 and 1.4;
Pittsburgh, PA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone on the Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4 from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45
a.m. on August 8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. This safety zone is needed
to protect persons participating in the Pittsburgh Triathlon. Entry
into this zone will be prohibited to all vessels, mariners, and persons
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Pittsburgh or a designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 16, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (412) 221-
0807, email Jennifer.L.Haggins@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
SAR Search and Rescue
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If
[[Page 37563]]
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0332] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0332) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard has a long history working with local, state, and
federal agencies in areas to improve emergency response, to prepare for
events that call for swift action, and to protect our nation. The Coast
Guard is proposing to establish this safety zone on the waters of the
Allegheny River for the Pittsburgh Triathlon. The marine event is
scheduled to take place from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August 8, 2015
and August 9, 2015. This proposed rule is necessary to protect the
safety of the participants, spectators, commercial traffic, and the
general public on the navigable waters of the United States during the
event.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this proposed rule are found in
33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1; 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define safety zones. The purpose of this proposed safety zone is to
protect the participants of the Pittsburgh Triathlon during the swim
portion of the event from the hazards of other vessels in the water.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is necessary to establish a safety zone that
will encompass all waters of the Allegheny River in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. The proposed safety zone regulations would be enforced
from approximately 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. for approximately 3 hours on
August 8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. As proposed, the safety zone would
be a complete closure on the Allegheny River from mile 0.0 to mile 1.4
from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August 8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. All
persons and vessels, except those persons and vessels participating in
the triathlon and those vessels enforcing the areas, would be
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the proposed safety zone area.
Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the enforcement areas by
contacting the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh by telephone at (412)
221-0807, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the enforcement areas is granted by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh
or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Pittsburgh or a designated representative.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The temporary safety
zone listed in this proposed rule will restrict vessel traffic from
entering, transiting, or anchoring within a portion of the Allegheny
River. The effect of this proposed regulation will not be significant
for several reasons: (1) The amount of time the Allegheny River will be
closed (2) the impacts on routine navigation are expected to be minimal
because notifications to the marine community will be made through
local notice to mariners (LNM) and broadcast notice to mariners (BNM).
Therefore, these notifications will allow the public to plan operations
around the proposed safety zone and its enforcement times.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit the Allegheny River from mile 0.0 to mile 1.4
effective from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45
[[Page 37564]]
a.m. on August 8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. This proposed safety zone
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because this proposed rule will impede navigational
traffic for a short period of time. Traffic in this area is almost
entirely limited to recreational vessels and commercial towing vessels.
Notifications to the marine community will be made through BNMs and
electronic mail. Notices of changes to the proposed safety zone and
scheduled effective times and enforcement periods will also be made.
Deviation from the proposed restrictions may be requested from the COTP
or designated representative and will be considered on a case-by-case
basis.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rulemaking would
have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rulemaking does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary safety zone. The safety zone will be
on the Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4 from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m.
on August 8, 2015 and August 9, 2015. This action is necessary to
protect persons and property during the Pittsburgh Triathlon. This rule
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T08-0332 is added to subpart F, under the
[[Page 37565]]
undesignated center heading Eighth Coast Guard District, to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0332 Safety Zone; Allegheny River between mile 0.0 and
1.4; Pittsburgh, PA.
(a) Locations. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters on the Allegheny River mile 0.0 to mile 1.4.
(b) Effective date and time. The safety zone listed in section (a)
is effective from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on August 8, 2015 and August
9, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this area is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Pittsburgh or a designated
representative.
(2) Spectator vessels may safely transit outside the safety zones
at a minimum safe speed, but may not anchor, block, loiter, or impede
participants or official patrol vessels.
(3) Vessels requiring entry into or passage through the safety
zones must request permission from the COTP Pittsburgh or a designated
representative. They may be contacted by telephone at (412) 412-0807.
(4) All vessels shall comply with the instructions of the COTP
Pittsburgh and designated personnel. Designated personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
(d) Informational Broadcasts: The Captain of the Port, Pittsburgh
or a designated representative will inform the public through broadcast
notices to mariners (BNM) of the effective period for the safety zone
and of any changes in the effective period, enforcement times, or size
of the safety zones.
Dated: June 10, 2015.
L. N. Weaver,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2015-16258 Filed 6-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P