Designation of Oceanic Airspace, 37710-37712 [2015-16246]
Download as PDF
37710
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices
notice that the inventory is available to
the public.’’
Consequently, through this notice, we
are announcing that OSC’s service
contract inventory for FY 2014 is
available to the public. The inventory
provides information on service contract
actions over $25,000 that OSC made in
FY 2014. OSC’s finance section has
posted its inventory, and a summary of
the inventory can be found at our
homepage at the following link:
https://osc.gov/Pages/ResourcesReportsAndInfo.aspx.
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Mark P. Cohen,
Principal Deputy Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–16121 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405–01–P
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
Survey Renewal for FY 2015—Request
for Comment
Office of Special Counsel.
First Notice for public comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), and implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, the U.S.
Office of Special Counsel (OSC), plans
to request approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for use
of a previously approved information
collection consisting of an electronic
survey form. The current OMB approval
for the OSC Survey expires 10/31/15.
We are submitting the electronic survey
for renewal, based on its pending t
expiration. There are several changes
being submitted with this request for
renewal of the use of the OSC survey.
Current and former Federal employees,
employee representatives, other Federal
agencies, state and local government
employees, and the general public are
invited to comment on this for the first
time. Comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection
consisting of our survey is necessary for
the proper performance of OSC
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of OSC’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Comments should be received by
August 31, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Karl
Kammann, Director of Finance, at the
address shown above; by facsimile at
(202) 254–3711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSC is an
independent agency responsible for,
among other things, (1) investigation of
allegations of prohibited personnel
practices defined by law at 5 U.S.C.
2302(b), protection of whistleblowers,
and certain other illegal employment
practices under titles 5 and 38 of the
U.S. Code, affecting current or former
Federal employees or applicants for
employment, and covered state and
local government employees; and (2) the
interpretation and enforcement of Hatch
Act provisions on political activity in
chapters 15 and 73 of title 5 of the U.S.
Code.
Title of Collection: Office of Special
Counsel (OSC) Annual Survey; OMB
Control Number 3255–0003, Expiration
10/31/2015.
OSC is required to conduct an annual
survey of individuals who seek its
assistance. Section 13 of Public Law
103–424 (1994), codified at 5 U.S.C.
1212 note, states, in part: ‘‘[T]he survey
shall—(1) Determine if the individual
seeking assistance was fully apprised of
their rights; (2) determine whether the
individual was successful either at the
Office of Special Counsel or the Merit
Systems Protection Board; and (3)
determine if the individual, whether
successful or not, was satisfied with the
treatment received from the Office of
Special Counsel.’’ The same section also
provides that survey results are to be
published in OSC’s annual reports to
Congress. Copies of prior years’ annual
reports are available on OSC’s Web site,
at https://osc.gov/Pages/ResourcesReportsAndInfo.aspx or by calling OSC
at (202) 254–3600. The survey form for
the collection of information is available
by calling OSC at (202) 254–3600.
Type of Information Collection
Request: Approval of previously
approved collection of information that
expires on 10/31/2015, with some
revisions. The Disclosure Unit was
added for the first time to the electronic
survey of individuals with cases
resolved in FY 2014. The second major
change is that the survey is hosted by
Survey Monkey, (https://
www.surveymonkey.com) rather than
being an in-house supported IT tool. A
future enhancement will add an
additional question to the survey about
the user’s experience with our new OSC
Form 14 Wizard and electronic
complaint form, which is currently in
development.
Affected public: Current and former
Federal employees, applicants for
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal employment, state and local
government employees, and their
representatives, and the general public.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary
Estimated Annual Number of Survey
Form Respondents: 320.
Frequency of Survey form use:
Annual.
Estimated Average Amount of Time
for a Person To Respond to survey: 12
minutes.
Estimated Annual Survey Burden: 109
hours.
This survey form is used to survey
current and former Federal employees
and applicants for Federal employment
who have submitted allegations of
possible prohibited personnel practices
or other prohibited activity for
investigation and possible prosecution
by OSC, and whose matter has been
closed or otherwise resolved during the
prior fiscal year, on their experience at
OSC. Specifically, the survey asks
questions relating to whether the
respondent was: (1) Apprised of his or
her rights; (2) successful at the OSC or
at the Merit Systems Protection Board;
and (3) satisfied with the treatment
received at the OSC.
Dated: June 15. 2015.
Carolyn N. Lerner,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–16110 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1497; Airspace
Docket No. 15–AWA–4]
RIN 2120–AA66
Designation of Oceanic Airspace
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of provision of air traffic
services in oceanic airspace.
AGENCY:
By this action the FAA
informs airspace users of the type of air
traffic control (ATC) service provided in
the oceanic airspace controlled by the
United States of America (U.S.). This
notice is consistent with U.S.
obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation (Chicago
Convention), including, that all
Contracting States disseminate
information regarding the types of ATC
services provided in oceanic airspace
under their control.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Stahl, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO)
The Chicago Convention was adopted
to promote the safe and orderly
development of international civil
aviation. The Chicago Convention also
created the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO), which
promulgates uniform international
Standards and Recommended Practices
(SARPs) aimed at standardizing
international civil aviation operational
practices and services. Currently, these
SARPs are detailed in 18 annexes to the
Chicago Convention. Annex 11, Air
Traffic Services, and Annex 15,
Aeronautical Information Services, are
of particular relevance to this notice as
they address civil aircraft operations,
the establishment of airspace, ATC
services in international airspace, and
the dissemination of aeronautical
information.
Most recently ICAO recommended,
and the FAA concurred, that all
Contracting States take action to define
their oceanic airspace, and inform those
interested as to the type of ATC services
that would be provided.
By this action the FAA gives notice to
those interested parties operating in the
oceanic airspace controlled by the U.S.
of the type of ATC services provided
within the airspace.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ATC Services/Procedures Provided
Pursuant to the Chicago Convention,
the U.S. accepted responsibility for
providing ATC services over the
domestic U.S. and within certain areas
of the western half of the North Atlantic,
the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean, and
the North Pacific. In the airspace over
the contiguous U.S. and out to 12
nautical miles (NM) from the U.S.
shores, domestic ATC separation is
applied (with certain limitations) along
with additional services (e.g., traffic
advisories, bird activity information,
weather and chaff information, etc.).
The U.S. also manages airspace areas
outside of the domestic U.S. These areas
are called Control Areas (CTA) and
Flight Information Regions (FIR). Within
these CTA/FIR the U.S. applies oceanic
separation procedures consistent with
ICAO regional procedures.
The FAA may also apply, per Annex
11, domestic ATC procedures within
designated Offshore/Control airspace
areas provided certain conditions are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
met. Specifically, these airspace areas
must be within signal coverage of
domestic radio navigational aid or ATC
radar coverage from the 12–NM limit
outward to the inner oceanic CTA/FIR
boundaries. The Chicago Convention
permits the application of domestic
ATC procedures even though this is
international airspace. However, within
the oceanic CTA/FIR area itself, ICAO
oceanic ATC procedures are used
instead of domestic procedures.
Article of Exemption
Article 3 of the Chicago Convention
provides that the Chicago Convention,
and its annexes, are not applicable to
state-aircraft (which includes military
aircraft). However, article 3 requires
states, when issuing regulations for their
state aircraft, to have due regard for the
safety of navigation of civil aircraft. The
U.S., as a Contracting State, complies
with this provision.
Further, article 12 obligates each
Contracting State to adopt measures to
ensure that persons operating an aircraft
within its territory will comply with
that state’s air traffic rules, and with
Annex 2, Rules of the Air, when
operating over the high seas. The U.S.
has satisfied this responsibility through
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 91, General Operating and
Flight Rules, which requires that
operators of aircraft comply with U.S.
operating rules when in the U.S. and
that U.S.-registered aircraft comply with
Annex 2 when over the high seas (see
14 CFR 91.703).
Section 91.703 applies only to civil
aircraft. State aircraft operating outside
the U.S. are only subject to the ‘‘due
regard’’ provisions of article 3 of the
Chicago Convention. The SARPs in
Annex 11, apply to airspace under the
jurisdiction of a Contracting State that
has accepted the responsibility of
providing air traffic services over the
high seas (oceanic airspace), or in
airspace of undetermined sovereignty.
U.S. Controlled Oceanic Airspace
The ICAO classes of airspace and
associated services provided, as
described in Annex 11, to be used by
the U.S. within their delegated Oceanic/
Arctic CTA/FIR areas are: (1) Class A
airspace area (instrument flight rules
(IFR) flights only are permitted, all
flights are provided with ATC service
and are separated from each other); (2)
Class E airspace area (IFR and visual
flight rules (VFR) flights are permitted,
IFR flights are provided with ATC
service and are separated from other IFR
flights); and (3) Class G airspace area
(IFR and VFR flights are permitted and
receive flight information service if
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37711
requested). All flights in these airspace
areas would receive traffic information
as far as is practical.
Anchorage Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Anchorage
Oceanic CTA/FIR can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G—below FL 55;
Class A—FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive
except less than 100 NM seaward is
Class E below FL 180;
Class E—above FL 600.
Anchorage Arctic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Anchorage
Arctic CTA/FIR can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G—below FL12;
Class E—FL12 to but not including
FL180;
Class A—FL180 to FL600 inclusive;
Class E—above FL 600.
Houston Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Houston
Oceanic CTA/FIR can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G—below FL 15;
Class E—FL 15 to, but not including FL
180;
Class A—FL 180 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E—above FL 600.
Miami Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Miami
Oceanic CTA/FIR can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G—below FL 25;
Class E—FL 25 to, but not including FL
180;
Class A—FL 180 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E—above FL 600.
New York Oceanic CTA/FIR, excluding
that portion of the airspace delegated to
NAVCANADA
Aircraft operating in the New York
Oceanic CTA/FIR, excluding that
portion of the airspace delegated to
NAVCANADA can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G—below FL 55;
Class A—FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E—above FL 600.
Oakland Oceanic OCA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Oakland
Oceanic OCA/FIR can expect to receive
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
37712
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G—below FL 55;
Class A—FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive
except less than 100 NM seaward
from the shoreline within controlled
airspace, sunrise to sunset, is Class E
below FL 200;
Class E—above FL 600.
Oakland CTA airspace area delegated to
Oakland Center by Fukuoka ATMC at
and above FL 55
Aircraft operating in the Oakland CTA
delegated airspace to Oakland Center at
and above FL 55 can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the
following types of airspace and
associated altitudes:
Class A—FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive
except less than 100 NM seaward
from the shoreline within controlled
airspace, sunrise to sunset, is Class E
below FL 200;
Class E—above FL 600.
San Juan Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating-in the San Juan
CTA/FIR can expect to receive ATC
services associated with the following
types of airspace and associated
altitudes:
Class G—below FL 25;
Class E—FL 25 to, but not including FL
180;
Class A—FL 180 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E—above FL 600.
Accordingly, the U.S. designation of
ICAO classes of Oceanic Airspace and
associated altitudes, as described in this
notice will be reflected on the
appropriate aeronautical charts.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 23,
2015.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations
Group.
[FR Doc. 2015–16246 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Release From Federal Grant
Assurance Obligations for Elko
Regional Airport (EKO), Elko, Nevada
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request to release
airport land.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes to rule
and invites public comment on the
application for a release of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
approximately 5,037 square feet of
airport property at the Elko Municipal
Airport (Airport), City of Elko, Nevada.
The City of Elko proposes to release the
airport land in order to acquire an equal
5,037 square feet parcel of privatelyowned land. The land exchange was
proposed after a 2011 deed survey
disclosed that the airport perimeter
fence encroached into private property
abutting the airport. Relocation of the
fence is not practical due to the cost
associated with moving the fence and
underground utilities. The parties
concluded that the encroachment
problem could be resolved with an
equitable land exchange. Since the
release land is not needed for airport
purposes, the exchange will not
negatively impact the airport or civil
aviation.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 31, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments on the request may be mailed
or delivered to the FAA at the following
address Mike N. Williams, Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration,
Phoenix Airports District Office,
Federal Register Comment, 3800 N.
Central Avenue, Suite 1025, 10th Floor,
Phoenix, Arizona 85012. In addition,
one copy of the comment submitted to
the FAA must be mailed or delivered to
Mr. Mark Gibbs, Airport Director, Elko
Regional Airport, 975 Terminal Way,
Elko, Nevada 89801.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for
the 21st Century (AIR 21), Public Law
106–181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61),
this notice must be published in the
Federal Register 30 days before the
Secretary may waive any condition
imposed on a federally obligated airport
by surplus property conveyance deeds
or grant agreements.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The City of Elko, Nevada requested a
release from sponsor grant assurance
obligations for approximately 5,037
square feet of airport land to facilitate a
land exchange so the airport can acquire
an equal 5,037 square feet of privatelyowned land. A land survey conducted
in 2011 disclosed that the airport
perimeter fence encroached into private
property abutting the airport. Relocating
the fence line and underground utilities
would be costly for the Airport. The
City offered to trade a parcel of unused
airport land that is not needed for
airport purposes for the portion of land
into which the airport fence encroaches.
The land exchange would conform to
Nevada Revised Statutes for Boundary
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Line Adjustments. Appraisals
concluded the two parcels have equal
values. As a result, the City and land
owner concluded that a land swap
would represent an equitable and less
expensive way to resolve the
encroachment problem. The release
land is not needed for airport purposes
and land exchange will result in no net
loss in value or negative impact for the
airport. The reuse of the released parcel
for commercial purposes represents a
compatible land use that will not
interfere with the airport or its
operation. The acquisition of the
privately owned parcel will obviate the
need to relocate the perimeter fence.
Therefore, the exchange provides a
benefit to the airport and civil aviation.
Issued in Phoenix, Arizona: June 26, 2015.
Mike N. Williams,
Manager, Phoenix Airports District Office,
Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2015–16207 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Sixth Meeting: Special Committee 231
(SC 231)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Sixth Meeting Notice of Special
Committee 231.
AGENCY:
The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of the sixth meeting
of the Special Committee 231.
DATES: The meeting will be held
September 16th–September 24th from
9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036,
Tel: (202) 330–0663.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by
telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202)
833–9434, or Web site at
https://www.rtca.org or Sophie Bousquet,
Program Director, RTCA, Inc.,
sbousquet@rtca.org, (202) 330–0663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
given for a meeting of the Special
Committee 231. The agenda will include
the following:
SUMMARY:
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
1. Welcome/Introduction
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37710-37712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16246]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1497; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWA-4]
RIN 2120-AA66
Designation of Oceanic Airspace
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of provision of air traffic services in oceanic
airspace.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this action the FAA informs airspace users of the type of
air traffic control (ATC) service provided in the oceanic airspace
controlled by the United States of America (U.S.). This notice is
consistent with U.S. obligations under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention), including, that all Contracting
States disseminate information regarding the types of ATC services
provided in oceanic airspace under their control.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Stahl, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace
[[Page 37711]]
Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
The Chicago Convention was adopted to promote the safe and orderly
development of international civil aviation. The Chicago Convention
also created the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),
which promulgates uniform international Standards and Recommended
Practices (SARPs) aimed at standardizing international civil aviation
operational practices and services. Currently, these SARPs are detailed
in 18 annexes to the Chicago Convention. Annex 11, Air Traffic
Services, and Annex 15, Aeronautical Information Services, are of
particular relevance to this notice as they address civil aircraft
operations, the establishment of airspace, ATC services in
international airspace, and the dissemination of aeronautical
information.
Most recently ICAO recommended, and the FAA concurred, that all
Contracting States take action to define their oceanic airspace, and
inform those interested as to the type of ATC services that would be
provided.
By this action the FAA gives notice to those interested parties
operating in the oceanic airspace controlled by the U.S. of the type of
ATC services provided within the airspace.
ATC Services/Procedures Provided
Pursuant to the Chicago Convention, the U.S. accepted
responsibility for providing ATC services over the domestic U.S. and
within certain areas of the western half of the North Atlantic, the
Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean, and the North Pacific. In the airspace
over the contiguous U.S. and out to 12 nautical miles (NM) from the
U.S. shores, domestic ATC separation is applied (with certain
limitations) along with additional services (e.g., traffic advisories,
bird activity information, weather and chaff information, etc.).
The U.S. also manages airspace areas outside of the domestic U.S.
These areas are called Control Areas (CTA) and Flight Information
Regions (FIR). Within these CTA/FIR the U.S. applies oceanic separation
procedures consistent with ICAO regional procedures.
The FAA may also apply, per Annex 11, domestic ATC procedures
within designated Offshore/Control airspace areas provided certain
conditions are met. Specifically, these airspace areas must be within
signal coverage of domestic radio navigational aid or ATC radar
coverage from the 12-NM limit outward to the inner oceanic CTA/FIR
boundaries. The Chicago Convention permits the application of domestic
ATC procedures even though this is international airspace. However,
within the oceanic CTA/FIR area itself, ICAO oceanic ATC procedures are
used instead of domestic procedures.
Article of Exemption
Article 3 of the Chicago Convention provides that the Chicago
Convention, and its annexes, are not applicable to state-aircraft
(which includes military aircraft). However, article 3 requires states,
when issuing regulations for their state aircraft, to have due regard
for the safety of navigation of civil aircraft. The U.S., as a
Contracting State, complies with this provision.
Further, article 12 obligates each Contracting State to adopt
measures to ensure that persons operating an aircraft within its
territory will comply with that state's air traffic rules, and with
Annex 2, Rules of the Air, when operating over the high seas. The U.S.
has satisfied this responsibility through Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 91, General Operating and Flight Rules, which
requires that operators of aircraft comply with U.S. operating rules
when in the U.S. and that U.S.-registered aircraft comply with Annex 2
when over the high seas (see 14 CFR 91.703).
Section 91.703 applies only to civil aircraft. State aircraft
operating outside the U.S. are only subject to the ``due regard''
provisions of article 3 of the Chicago Convention. The SARPs in Annex
11, apply to airspace under the jurisdiction of a Contracting State
that has accepted the responsibility of providing air traffic services
over the high seas (oceanic airspace), or in airspace of undetermined
sovereignty.
U.S. Controlled Oceanic Airspace
The ICAO classes of airspace and associated services provided, as
described in Annex 11, to be used by the U.S. within their delegated
Oceanic/Arctic CTA/FIR areas are: (1) Class A airspace area (instrument
flight rules (IFR) flights only are permitted, all flights are provided
with ATC service and are separated from each other); (2) Class E
airspace area (IFR and visual flight rules (VFR) flights are permitted,
IFR flights are provided with ATC service and are separated from other
IFR flights); and (3) Class G airspace area (IFR and VFR flights are
permitted and receive flight information service if requested). All
flights in these airspace areas would receive traffic information as
far as is practical.
Anchorage Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Anchorage Oceanic CTA/FIR can expect to
receive ATC services associated with the following types of airspace
areas and associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL 55;
Class A--FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive except less than 100 NM seaward is
Class E below FL 180;
Class E--above FL 600.
Anchorage Arctic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Anchorage Arctic CTA/FIR can expect to
receive ATC services associated with the following types of airspace
areas and associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL12;
Class E--FL12 to but not including FL180;
Class A--FL180 to FL600 inclusive;
Class E--above FL 600.
Houston Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Houston Oceanic CTA/FIR can expect to
receive ATC services associated with the following types of airspace
areas and associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL 15;
Class E--FL 15 to, but not including FL 180;
Class A--FL 180 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E--above FL 600.
Miami Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Miami Oceanic CTA/FIR can expect to
receive ATC services associated with the following types of airspace
areas and associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL 25;
Class E--FL 25 to, but not including FL 180;
Class A--FL 180 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E--above FL 600.
New York Oceanic CTA/FIR, excluding that portion of the airspace
delegated to NAVCANADA
Aircraft operating in the New York Oceanic CTA/FIR, excluding that
portion of the airspace delegated to NAVCANADA can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL 55;
Class A--FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E--above FL 600.
Oakland Oceanic OCA/FIR
Aircraft operating in the Oakland Oceanic OCA/FIR can expect to
receive
[[Page 37712]]
ATC services associated with the following types of airspace areas and
associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL 55;
Class A--FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive except less than 100 NM seaward
from the shoreline within controlled airspace, sunrise to sunset, is
Class E below FL 200;
Class E--above FL 600.
Oakland CTA airspace area delegated to Oakland Center by Fukuoka ATMC
at and above FL 55
Aircraft operating in the Oakland CTA delegated airspace to Oakland
Center at and above FL 55 can expect to receive ATC services associated
with the following types of airspace and associated altitudes:
Class A--FL 55 to FL 600, inclusive except less than 100 NM seaward
from the shoreline within controlled airspace, sunrise to sunset, is
Class E below FL 200;
Class E--above FL 600.
San Juan Oceanic CTA/FIR
Aircraft operating-in the San Juan CTA/FIR can expect to receive
ATC services associated with the following types of airspace and
associated altitudes:
Class G--below FL 25;
Class E--FL 25 to, but not including FL 180;
Class A--FL 180 to FL 600, inclusive;
Class E--above FL 600.
Accordingly, the U.S. designation of ICAO classes of Oceanic
Airspace and associated altitudes, as described in this notice will be
reflected on the appropriate aeronautical charts.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 23, 2015.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2015-16246 Filed 6-30-15; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P