Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus, 37716-37717 [2015-16140]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 37716 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices recognize partners, projects, and processes that exemplify innovation and commitment to the human environment, and organization and process innovation. Awardees must make an outstanding contribution that goes beyond traditional transportation projects and that encourages environmental stewardship and partnerships to achieve a truly multifaceted, environmentally sensitive transportation solution. Award: Anyone can nominate a project, process, person or group that has used FHWA funding sources to make an outstanding contribution to transportation and the environment. The nominator is responsible for submitting an application via the FHWA Environmental Excellence Awards Web site that gives a summary of the outstanding accomplishments of the entry. The collected information will be used by FHWA to evaluate the project, showcase environmental excellence, and enhance the public’s knowledge of environmental stewardship in the planning and project development process. Nominations will be reviewed by a panel of judges from varying backgrounds. It is anticipated that awards will be given every 2 years. The winners are presented plaques at an awards ceremony. Respondents: Anyone who has used FHWA funding sources in the 50 States, U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia. Frequency: The information will be collected biennially. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 8 hours per respondent per application. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: It is expected that the respondents will complete approximately 150 applications for an estimated total of 1200 annual burden hours. Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the FHWA’s performance; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that the burden could be minimized, including the use of electronic technology, without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB’s clearance of this information collection. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jun 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 Issued on: June 25, 2015. Michael Howell, Information Collection Officer. II. Background [FR Doc. 2015–16166 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0315] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. AGENCY: FMCSA confirms its decision to exempt 73 individuals from its rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce. The exemptions enable these individuals to operate CMVs in interstate commerce. DATES: The exemptions were effective on May 8, 2015. The exemptions expire on May 8, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, (202) 366–4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room W64–224, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Electronic Access You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document Management System (FDMS) at: https:// www.regulations.gov. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to https:// www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12–140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 On April 7, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal diabetes exemption applications from 73 individuals and requested comments from the public (80 FR 18681). The public comment period closed on May 7, 2015, and two comments were received. FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 73 applicants and determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3). III. Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970 because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The diabetes rule provides that ‘‘A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring insulin for control’’ (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)). FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the Agency’s July 2000 study entitled ‘‘A Report to Congress on the Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the Transportation Act for the 21st Century.’’ The report concluded that a safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777), Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce. These 73 applicants have had ITDM over a range of one to 36 years. These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case, an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus, received education related to E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices diabetes management, and is on a stable insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the April 7, 2015, Federal Register notice and they will not be repeated in this notice. III. Discussion of Comments FMCSA received two comments in this proceeding. The comments are addressed below. An anonymous commenter stated that allowing insulin-dependent drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce would increase safety as more experienced drivers would be allowed to drive. This is the purpose of the Diabetes Exemption Program. Charla Sloan, Transit Director of the KI BOIS Area Transit System in Oklahoma, stated that she believes insulin-dependent drivers should be allowed to operate CMVs in interstate commerce without an exemption. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES IV. Basis for Exemption Determination Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce. To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered medical reports about the applicants’ ITDM and vision, and reviewed the treating endocrinologists’ medical opinion related to the ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin. Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. V. Conditions and Requirements The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the applicants in the exemption document and they include the following: (1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to manage VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jun 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s or optometrist’s report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver’s qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. VI. Conclusion Based upon its evaluation of the 73 exemption applications, FMCSA exempts the following drivers from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR 391.64(b)): Tony W. Alonzo (TX) Rafael M. Alvarado (TX) Mark J. Avedisian (NY) Timothy J. Burke (MA) Eric E. Burton (TN) Roger D. Cassada (VA) Timothy W. Clark (OH) Leonard W. Cleaves (MA) Bruce Combs (OH) Larry A. Cramer (SD) Bradford A. Davies (ME) Larry A. DeSanno (OR) Robert S. Doering (IL) Michael L. Domarus (MN) Matthew G. Drabant (CO) Adan A. Espinoza (CA) Howard E. Fruehling (IA) Michael F. Gabbianelli (NJ) Christopher W. Geib (OH) Ernest W. Gibbs (VA) James E. Goins (NJ) Gregory J. Goodenbour (IA) Paul M. Gugerty, Jr. (IL) William F. Guttormsen (NJ) Michael D. Howell (NC) Curtis L. Hudson (SC) Mayer Indorsky (NY) Raymond J. Jacobs (NY) Lyle J. Kaehler (WI) Charles F. Kennedy (PA) Stephen P. Koons (PA) Curtis G. Kirchbaum (PA) Joseph A. Lahaderne (NY) Walter P. Leck (PA) Eric F. Leigh (IL) Alvin G. Madwatkins (NJ) Clayton B. Mathis (GA) John R. Mauney (NC) Derrell R. McCaskill (MD) Darrel F. McCoy, Jr. (MO) Eric O. McLamb (NC) PO 00000 Frm 00138 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 37717 William W. McPhee (MI) Michael S. Murray (IA) Benjamin M. Naastad (ND) Richard G. Niemi (WI) Kenthia E. Norfleet (AL) Donald M. Oakes (NH) Philip L. Orsi (NY) Robert E. Piernik (FL) Harold E. Pratt (MO) Jack C. Reed (NE) Fernando Rivera (IL) Timothy F. Rodehaver (OH) Robin R. Roth (MN) Lewis S. Russell (OR) William J. Schmidt (MN) Todd J. Schoeller (WI) Gary H. Schrot (WI) Ryan A. Snow (PA) Kevin L. Sundh (UT) William H. Terry (IN) Gary E. Tilson (VA) Duane K. Torlish, Jr. (NY) Ronald W. Truitt (PA) Timothy E. Vanderwiele (NY) Leo D. Vermeire (WA) Brian W. Walls (PA) Gary L. Webster (VT) Lance A. Wendinger (MN) Allan W. Widener (GA) Shane D. Wildoner (PA) Roy L. Woodbury (OK) Kyle A. Wright (WA) In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption is valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time. Issued on: June 23, 2015. Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2015–16140 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37716-37717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0315]


Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes 
Mellitus

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA confirms its decision to exempt 73 individuals from its 
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) 
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce. 
The exemptions enable these individuals to operate CMVs in interstate 
commerce.

DATES: The exemptions were effective on May 8, 2015. The exemptions 
expire on May 8, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles A. Horan, III, Director, 
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, (202) 366-4001, 
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room W64-224, Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. 
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Electronic Access

    You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document 
Management System (FDMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the 
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits 
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT 
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information 
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the 
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at 
www.dot.gov/privacy.

II. Background

    On April 7, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal 
diabetes exemption applications from 73 individuals and requested 
comments from the public (80 FR 18681). The public comment period 
closed on May 7, 2015, and two comments were received.
    FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 73 applicants and 
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would 
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that 
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR 
391.41(b)(3).

III. Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants

    The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970 
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a 
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The 
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive 
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical 
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring 
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
    FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the 
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the 
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated 
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the 
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a 
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to 
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal 
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777), 
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such 
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    These 73 applicants have had ITDM over a range of one to 36 years. 
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in 
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another 
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred 
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or 
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case, 
an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a 
willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus, 
received education related to

[[Page 37717]]

diabetes management, and is on a stable insulin regimen. These drivers 
report no other disqualifying conditions, including diabetes-related 
complications. Each meets the vision requirement at 49 CFR 
391.41(b)(10).
    The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were 
stated and discussed in detail in the April 7, 2015, Federal Register 
notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.

III. Discussion of Comments

    FMCSA received two comments in this proceeding. The comments are 
addressed below.
    An anonymous commenter stated that allowing insulin-dependent 
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce would increase safety as 
more experienced drivers would be allowed to drive. This is the purpose 
of the Diabetes Exemption Program.
    Charla Sloan, Transit Director of the KI BOIS Area Transit System 
in Oklahoma, stated that she believes insulin-dependent drivers should 
be allowed to operate CMVs in interstate commerce without an exemption.

IV. Basis for Exemption Determination

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption 
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption 
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than 
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the 
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA 
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and 
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the 
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
    Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these 
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is 
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the 
exemption.

V. Conditions and Requirements

    The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the 
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following: 
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist 
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual 
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each 
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes 
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to 
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other 
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is 
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide 
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical 
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that 
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to 
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep 
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when 
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local 
enforcement official.

VI. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the 73 exemption applications, FMCSA 
exempts the following drivers from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 
391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR 
391.64(b)):

Tony W. Alonzo (TX)
Rafael M. Alvarado (TX)
Mark J. Avedisian (NY)
Timothy J. Burke (MA)
Eric E. Burton (TN)
Roger D. Cassada (VA)
Timothy W. Clark (OH)
Leonard W. Cleaves (MA)
Bruce Combs (OH)
Larry A. Cramer (SD)
Bradford A. Davies (ME)
Larry A. DeSanno (OR)
Robert S. Doering (IL)
Michael L. Domarus (MN)
Matthew G. Drabant (CO)
Adan A. Espinoza (CA)
Howard E. Fruehling (IA)
Michael F. Gabbianelli (NJ)
Christopher W. Geib (OH)
Ernest W. Gibbs (VA)
James E. Goins (NJ)
Gregory J. Goodenbour (IA)
Paul M. Gugerty, Jr. (IL)
William F. Guttormsen (NJ)
Michael D. Howell (NC)
Curtis L. Hudson (SC)
Mayer Indorsky (NY)
Raymond J. Jacobs (NY)
Lyle J. Kaehler (WI)
Charles F. Kennedy (PA)
Stephen P. Koons (PA)
Curtis G. Kirchbaum (PA)
Joseph A. Lahaderne (NY)
Walter P. Leck (PA)
Eric F. Leigh (IL)
Alvin G. Madwatkins (NJ)
Clayton B. Mathis (GA)
John R. Mauney (NC)
Derrell R. McCaskill (MD)
Darrel F. McCoy, Jr. (MO)
Eric O. McLamb (NC)
William W. McPhee (MI)
Michael S. Murray (IA)
Benjamin M. Naastad (ND)
Richard G. Niemi (WI)
Kenthia E. Norfleet (AL)
Donald M. Oakes (NH)
Philip L. Orsi (NY)
Robert E. Piernik (FL)
Harold E. Pratt (MO)
Jack C. Reed (NE)
Fernando Rivera (IL)
Timothy F. Rodehaver (OH)
Robin R. Roth (MN)
Lewis S. Russell (OR)
William J. Schmidt (MN)
Todd J. Schoeller (WI)
Gary H. Schrot (WI)
Ryan A. Snow (PA)
Kevin L. Sundh (UT)
William H. Terry (IN)
Gary E. Tilson (VA)
Duane K. Torlish, Jr. (NY)
Ronald W. Truitt (PA)
Timothy E. Vanderwiele (NY)
Leo D. Vermeire (WA)
Brian W. Walls (PA)
Gary L. Webster (VT)
Lance A. Wendinger (MN)
Allan W. Widener (GA)
Shane D. Wildoner (PA)
Roy L. Woodbury (OK)
Kyle A. Wright (WA)

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption is 
valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will 
be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with 
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has 
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was 
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent 
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the 
exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the 
person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at 
that time.

    Issued on: June 23, 2015.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-16140 Filed 6-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.