Safety Zone; Charleston Patriot Festival, Cooper River; Charleston, SC, 36953-36956 [2015-15934]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
information utilized to establish the
indirect cost rate proposal submitted.
(3) The certification of final indirect
costs shall read as follows:
Certificate of Final Indirect Costs
This is to certify that I have reviewed
this proposal to establish final indirect
cost rates and to the best of my
knowledge and belief:
1. All costs included in this proposal
(identify proposal and date) to establish
final indirect cost rates for (identify
period covered by rate) are allowable in
accordance with the cost principles of
the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) of title 48, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), part 31; and
2. This proposal does not include any
costs which are expressly unallowable
under applicable cost principles of the
FAR of 48 CFR part 31.
Firm:
Signature:
Name of Certifying Official:
Title:
Date of Execution:
[FR Doc. 2015–15617 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0022]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Charleston Patriot
Festival, Cooper River; Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on the Cooper
River in Charleston, South Carolina
during the International Outboard
Grand Prix (IOGP) Charleston Patriot
Festival, a series of high-speed boat
races. The event is scheduled to take
place on Friday, September 11 through
Sunday, September 13, 2015.
Approximately 25 high-speed race boats
are anticipated to participate in the
races. This safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of life and
property on navigable waters of the
United States during the event. This
safety zone would temporarily restrict
vessel traffic in a portion of Cooper
River in front of River Front Park.
Persons and vessels that are not
participating in the races would be
prohibited from entering, transiting
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Jun 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the restricted area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative.
This proposed rule would be
effective from September 11, 2015 until
September 13, 2015. It would be
enforced on September 11, 2015 from
4:00 p.m. until 6:45 p.m.; on September
12, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. until 7:30 p.m.;
and on September 13, 2015 from 10:00
a.m. until 5:45 p.m. There will be
periodic river openings between each
race.
Comments and related material must
be received by the Coast Guard on or
before July 29, 2015. Requests for public
meetings must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Warrant Officer Christopher
Ruleman, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843)–740–3184, email
Christopher.L.Ruleman@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36953
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2015–0022] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2015–0022) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
36954
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one on or before July 14, 2015 using
one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or services
for individuals with disabilities or to
request special assistance at the public
meeting, contact the person named in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section, above.
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish a
safety zone: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C.
191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is
to protect the safety of spectator and
participant vessels and to ensure safety
of life and property of the general public
on the navigable waters of the United
States during the IOGP Charleston
Patriot Festival boat races.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
On Friday September 11 through
Sunday September 13, 2015 the IOGP
will host ‘‘Charleston Patriot Festival’’ a
series of high-speed boat races. The
event will be held on a portion of
Cooper River in Charleston, South
Carolina. Approximately 25 high-speed
race boats are anticipated to participate
in the races.
The proposed rule would establish a
safety zone to encompass certain waters
of the Cooper River in Charleston, South
Carolina. The safety zone would be
enforced daily: 4:00 p.m. through 6:45
p.m. on September 11, 9:00 a.m. through
7:30 p.m. on September 12, and 10:00
a.m. through 5:45 p.m. on September 13,
2015. There will be periodic river
openings to allow vessel traffic to pass
between races. The safety zone
establishes a regulated area around
vessels participating in the event in the
vicinity of Cooper River Front Park.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Jun 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
Persons and vessels, except those
participating in the race, would be
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring, or remaining within
the safety zone unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels
would be able to request authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area by
contacting the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16. If
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area is granted by the Captain
of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization would be
required to comply with the instructions
of the Captain of the Port Charleston or
designated representative. The Coast
Guard would provide notice of the
safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The economic impact of this
proposed rule is not significant for the
following reasons: (1) Although persons
and vessels would not be able to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area without
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated
representative, they would be able to
operate in the surrounding area during
the enforcement periods; (2) even
during the enforcement periods, the
River would periodically open between
races to allow vessel traffic to pass; (3)
persons and vessels would still be able
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area if
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
representative; and (4) the Coast Guard
would provide advance notification of
the regulated area to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities:
This proposed rule may affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of the Charleston
harbor encompassed within the safety
zone on September 11, 2015 from 4:00
p.m. until 6:45 p.m.; on September 12,
2015 from 9:00 a.m. until 7:30 p.m.; and
on September 13, 2015 from 10:00 a.m.
until 5:45 p.m. For the reasons
discussed in the Regulatory Planning
and Review section above, this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Jun 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
36955
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
11. Indian Tribal Governments
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a safety zone
effective from 4:00 p.m. September 11
through 5:45 p.m. on September 13,
2015. This proposed rule involves
establishing a safety zone as described
in Figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0022 to
Subpart F under the undesignated
center heading ‘‘Seventh Coast Guard
District’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T07–0022 Safety Zones; Charleston
Patriot Festival, Cooper River; Charleston,
SC.
a) Regulated Area. The proposed rule
would establish a safety zone on certain
waters of the Charleston harbor in
Charleston, South Carolina. The safety
zone will consist of a regulated area
which will be enforced daily from 4:00
p.m. through 6:45 p.m. on September
11, 9:00 a.m. through 7:30 p.m. on
September 12, and 10:00 a.m. through
5:45 p.m. on September 13, 2015. The
safety zone establishes a regulated area
around vessels participating in the event
in the vicinity of Cooper River Front
Park.
1. Regulated Area. All waters of the
Charleston Harbor encompassed within
the following points; starting at point 1
in position 32°52′31.31″ N.
079°57′44.31″ W.; thence west to point
2 in position 32°52′28.69″ N.
079°58′00.52″ W.; thence south to point
3 in position 32°51′58.83″ N.
079°57′48.28″ W.; thence east to point 4
in position 32°52′03.79″ N.
079°57′33.61″ W.; thence back to origin.
All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(a) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(b) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels, except those participating in the
Charleston Patriot Festival, or serving as
safety vessels, are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the regulated
area. Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
36956
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone is granted by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Charleston or
designated representative.
(2) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Marine
Safety Information Bulletins, Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(e) Enforcement Dates. This rule will
be enforced daily during the effective
dates: From 4:00 p.m. through 6:45 p.m.
on September 11, 9:00 a.m. through 7:30
p.m. on September 12, and 10:00 a.m.
through 5:45 p.m. on September 13,
2015.
Dated: June 17, 2015.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2015–15934 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0205; FRL–9929–68–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Infrastructure for the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
elements of a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submission from the State of New
Mexico for the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The submittal addresses how
the existing SIP provides for
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS
(infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP
ensures that the State’s SIP is adequate
to meet the state’s responsibilities under
the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Jun 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
R06–OAR–2014–0205, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions.
• Email: Sherry Fuerst at
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov.
• Mail or delivery: Guy Donaldson,
Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. Deliveries are accepted
only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4
p.m. weekdays, and not on legal
holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2014–
0205. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherry Fuerst, telephone 214–665–6454,
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with her or Bill Deese at
214–665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
On June 22, 2010, EPA revised the
primary SO2 NAAQS (hereafter the 2010
SO2 NAAQS) to establish a new 1-hour
standard, with a level of 75 parts per
billion, based on the 3-year average of
the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour
daily maximum concentrations (75 FR
35520). Each state must submit an i-SIP
within three years after the
promulgation of a new or revised
NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA
includes a list of specific elements the
i-SIP must meet. EPA issued guidance
addressing the i-SIP elements for
NAAQS.1 The Secretary of the New
Mexico Environmental Department
(NMED) submitted an i-SIP revision to
address this revised NAAQS.
EPA is proposing to approve the New
Mexico i-SIP submittal for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS.2
II. EPA’s Evaluation of New Mexico’s
i-SIP Submittal
Below is a summary of EPA’s
evaluation of the New Mexico i-SIP for
each applicable element of 110(a)(2)
A–M.3 New Mexico provided a
demonstration of how the existing New
Mexico SIP met all the requirements of
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS on February 14,
2014. This SIP submission became
complete by operation of law on August
14, 2014. See CAA section 110(k)(1)(B).
1 ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean
Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),’’
Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, September 13,
2013.
2 Additional information on: The history of SO ,
2
its levels, forms and, determination of compliance;
EPA’s approach for reviewing i-SIPs; the details of
the SIP submittal and EPA’s evaluation; the effect
of recent court decisions on i-SIPs; the statute and
regulatory citations in the New Mexico SIP specific
to this review; the specific i-SIP applicable CAA
and EPA regulatory citations; Federal Register
Notice citations for New Mexico SIP approvals;
New Mexico’s minor New Source Review program
and EPA approval activities; and, New Mexico’s
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
program can be found in the Technical Support
Document (TSD).
3 A detailed discussion of our evaluation can be
found in the TSD for this action. The TSD can be
accessed through www.regulations.gov (e-docket
EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0205).
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36953-36956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15934]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-0022]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Charleston Patriot Festival, Cooper River;
Charleston, SC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the
Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina during the International
Outboard Grand Prix (IOGP) Charleston Patriot Festival, a series of
high-speed boat races. The event is scheduled to take place on Friday,
September 11 through Sunday, September 13, 2015. Approximately 25 high-
speed race boats are anticipated to participate in the races. This
safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of life and property
on navigable waters of the United States during the event. This safety
zone would temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a portion of Cooper
River in front of River Front Park. Persons and vessels that are not
participating in the races would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the restricted
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
DATES: This proposed rule would be effective from September 11, 2015
until September 13, 2015. It would be enforced on September 11, 2015
from 4:00 p.m. until 6:45 p.m.; on September 12, 2015 from 9:00 a.m.
until 7:30 p.m.; and on September 13, 2015 from 10:00 a.m. until 5:45
p.m. There will be periodic river openings between each race.
Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard
on or before July 29, 2015. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before July 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Warrant Officer Christopher Ruleman, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone
(843)-740-3184, email Christopher.L.Ruleman@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0022] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0022) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
[[Page 36954]]
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one on or before July 14, 2015 using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register. For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities or to request special
assistance at the public meeting, contact the person named in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section, above.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish a safety zone: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is to protect the safety of
spectator and participant vessels and to ensure safety of life and
property of the general public on the navigable waters of the United
States during the IOGP Charleston Patriot Festival boat races.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
On Friday September 11 through Sunday September 13, 2015 the IOGP
will host ``Charleston Patriot Festival'' a series of high-speed boat
races. The event will be held on a portion of Cooper River in
Charleston, South Carolina. Approximately 25 high-speed race boats are
anticipated to participate in the races.
The proposed rule would establish a safety zone to encompass
certain waters of the Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina. The
safety zone would be enforced daily: 4:00 p.m. through 6:45 p.m. on
September 11, 9:00 a.m. through 7:30 p.m. on September 12, and 10:00
a.m. through 5:45 p.m. on September 13, 2015. There will be periodic
river openings to allow vessel traffic to pass between races. The
safety zone establishes a regulated area around vessels participating
in the event in the vicinity of Cooper River Front Park. Persons and
vessels, except those participating in the race, would be prohibited
from entering, transiting through, anchoring, or remaining within the
safety zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated representative. Persons and vessels would be
able to request authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area by contacting the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
would be required to comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or designated representative. The Coast Guard would
provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The economic impact of
this proposed rule is not significant for the following reasons: (1)
Although persons and vessels would not be able to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area without
authorization from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, they would be able to operate in the surrounding area
during the enforcement periods; (2) even during the enforcement
periods, the River would periodically open between races to allow
vessel traffic to pass; (3) persons and vessels would still be able to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area
if authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative; and (4) the Coast Guard would provide advance
notification of the regulated area to the local maritime community by
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities: This proposed rule may affect the
following entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within that portion of the Charleston harbor encompassed within
the safety zone on September 11, 2015 from 4:00 p.m. until 6:45 p.m.;
on September 12, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. until 7:30 p.m.; and on September
13, 2015 from 10:00 a.m. until 5:45 p.m. For the reasons discussed in
the Regulatory Planning and Review section above, this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 36955]]
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a safety zone effective from 4:00 p.m. September
11 through 5:45 p.m. on September 13, 2015. This proposed rule involves
establishing a safety zone as described in Figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0022 to Subpart F under the
undesignated center heading ``Seventh Coast Guard District'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0022 Safety Zones; Charleston Patriot Festival, Cooper
River; Charleston, SC.
a) Regulated Area. The proposed rule would establish a safety zone
on certain waters of the Charleston harbor in Charleston, South
Carolina. The safety zone will consist of a regulated area which will
be enforced daily from 4:00 p.m. through 6:45 p.m. on September 11,
9:00 a.m. through 7:30 p.m. on September 12, and 10:00 a.m. through
5:45 p.m. on September 13, 2015. The safety zone establishes a
regulated area around vessels participating in the event in the
vicinity of Cooper River Front Park.
1. Regulated Area. All waters of the Charleston Harbor encompassed
within the following points; starting at point 1 in position
32[deg]52'31.31'' N. 079[deg]57'44.31'' W.; thence west to point 2 in
position 32[deg]52'28.69'' N. 079[deg]58'00.52'' W.; thence south to
point 3 in position 32[deg]51'58.83'' N. 079[deg]57'48.28'' W.; thence
east to point 4 in position 32[deg]52'03.79'' N. 079[deg]57'33.61'' W.;
thence back to origin. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
(a) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(b) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels, except those
participating in the Charleston Patriot Festival, or serving as safety
vessels, are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the regulated area. Persons and vessels
desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port
[[Page 36956]]
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the safety zone is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or designated representative.
(2) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Marine Safety Information Bulletins, Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
(e) Enforcement Dates. This rule will be enforced daily during the
effective dates: From 4:00 p.m. through 6:45 p.m. on September 11, 9:00
a.m. through 7:30 p.m. on September 12, and 10:00 a.m. through 5:45
p.m. on September 13, 2015.
Dated: June 17, 2015.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2015-15934 Filed 6-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P