Notice of Funding Availability for the Tribal Transportation Program Safety Funding, 36885-36891 [2015-15709]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
acres acquired through provisions of
Executive Order 9689, dated January 31,
1946 and the Surplus Property Act of
1944 with aeronautical rights attached.
The property is located on the west side
of the airport and is indentified as Lot
1 of Amended Durant Regional Airport
Industrial Park. The parcel is separated
from aviation activity by Cessna Road
and is located outside of the airport
perimeter fence. As airport owner, the
City of Durant has requested a full
release of their airport obligations. The
city plans to construct a Regional
Emergency Operations Center (REOC)
on the property. As a condition of the
transfer, the city will provide
$73,670.00 to fund construction of
T-hangars at Durant Regional—Eaker
Field.
Any person may inspect the request
in person at the FAA office listed above
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
In addition, any person may, upon
request, inspect the application, notice
and other documents germane to the
application in person at the Durant
Regional Airport.
DATES:
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 19,
2015.
Ignacio Flores,
Manager, Airports Division, Southwest
Region.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2015–15773 Filed 6–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Funding Availability for the
Tribal Transportation Program Safety
Funding
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of funding and requests
grant applications for FHWA’s Tribal
Transportation Program Safety Funds
(TTPSF). In addition, this notice
identifies selection criteria, application
requirements, and technical assistance
during the grant solicitation period for
the TTPSF.
The TTPSF is authorized within the
Tribal Transportation Program (TTP)
under the Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century Act (MAP–21), as
extended. The FHWA will distribute
these funds as described in this notice
on a competitive basis in a manner
consistent with the selection criteria.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
Applications must be submitted
through ttpsf@dot.gov no later than 5
p.m., e.t. on August 25, 2015 (the
‘‘application deadline’’). Applicants are
encouraged to submit applications in
advance of the application deadline;
however, applications will not be
evaluated, and awards will not be made
until after the application deadline.
The FHWA plans to conduct outreach
regarding the TTPSF in the form of a
Webinar on July 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.,
e.t. To join the Webinar, please click
this link then enter the room as a guest:
https://
connectdot.connectsolutions.com/
tribaltrans/. The audio portion of the
Webinar can be accessed from this
teleconference line: TOLL FREE 1–888–
251–2909; ACCESS CODE 4442306. The
Webinar will be recorded and posted on
FHWA’s Web site at: https://
www.flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/
safety/. A TDD is available for
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing at 202–366–3993.
ADDRESSES: Applications must be
submitted electronically to ttpsf@
dot.gov.
For
further information concerning this
notice please contact Russell Garcia,
TTPSF Program Manager, via email at
russell.garcia@dot.gov; by telephone at
202–366–9815; or by mail at Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. For
legal questions, please contact Ms.
Vivian Philbin, Office of the Chief
Counsel, by telephone at (720) 963–
3445; by email at vivian.philbin@
dot.gov; or by mail at Federal Highway
Administration, Central Federal Lands
Highway Division, 12300 West Dakota
Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80228. Office
hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
m.t., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
5, 2013, FHWA published the first
notice of funding availability for the
TTPSF (78 FR 47480). On November 13,
2013, FHWA awarded 183 tribes a total
of $8.6 million for 193 projects. On May
14, 2014, FHWA published the second
notice of funding availability for the
TTPSF (78 FR 47480). On March 10,
2015, FHWA awarded 82 tribes a total
of $8.5 million for 94 projects to
improve transportation safety on tribal
lands. The FHWA is publishing this
third notice to announce the availability
of an additional round of funding and
request grant applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36885
Table of Contents
A. Program Description
B. Federal Award Information
C. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
D. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for
Award Management (SAM)
4. Submission Dates and Time
5. Intergovernmental Review
6. Funding Restrictions
7. Other Submission Requirements
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning
Activities (funding goal 40 percent of
TTPSF)
ii. Engineering Improvements (funding goal
30 percent of TTPSF)
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services
Improvements (funding goal 20 percent
of TTPSF)
iv. Education Programs (funding goal 10
percent of TTPSF)
2. Review and Selection Process
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning
Activities
ii. Engineering Improvements
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services
iv. Education Programs
F. Federal Award Administration
Information
1. Federal Award Notice
2. Administrative and National Policy
3. Reporting
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business
Information
A. Program Description
Since the TTPSF was created under
MAP–21, $17.1 million has been
awarded to 265 Indian tribes for 287
projects to address safety issues in
Indian country over two rounds of
competitive grants. The intent of the
TTPSF is to address the prevention and
reduction of death or serious injuries in
transportation related crashes on tribal
lands where statistics are consistently
higher than the rest of the nation as a
whole.
The TTPSF emphasizes the
development of Strategic Transportation
Safety Plans using a data driven process
as a means for tribes to determine how
transportation safety needs will be
addressed in tribal communities. Tribal
Transportation Safety Plans are a tool
used to identify risk factors that lead to
serious injury or death and organize
various entities to strategically reduce
risk; projects submitted must be tied to
a comprehensive safety strategy and be
based on incident history (i.e., data).
Throughout the past two grant cycles,
TTPSF awards have supported safety
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
36886
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
planning, engineering, enforcement and
emergency services, and education
projects. Successful TTPSF projects
leverage resources, encourage
partnership, and have the data to
support the applicants’ approach in
addressing the prevention and reduction
of death or serious injuries in
transportation related crashes. A listing
of the safety projects/activities that were
previously submitted by the Tribes and
awarded TTP safety funds, as well as
additional safety related information
can be found on the TTP Safety Web site
at https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/
safety/ttpsf.htm.
In FY 2015, the TTPSF will continue
to fund projects of all eligible types,
including projects that are highway
safety improvement projects eligible
under the Highway Safety Improvement
Program as described in 23 United
States Code (U.S.C.) 148(a)(4), in the
same four categories identified in the
previous two rounds: (1) Safety plans
and safety planning activities (40
percent); (2) engineering improvements
(30 percent); (3) enforcement and
emergency services improvements (20
percent); and (4) education programs (10
percent).
The TTPSF Web site includes a series
of tools to help an applicant prepare a
successful grant application. Please
explore the grant application tools at:
https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/
safety/ttpsf.htm.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Federal Award Information
The MAP–21 (Pub. L. 112–141)
authorizes TTPSF as a set aside of not
more than 2 percent of the funds made
available under the TTP for FY 2013
and 2014. The Highway Transportation
Funding Act of 2014 (Pub. L. 113–159)
extended the provisions of MAP–21,
including the TTPSF set aside, through
May 31, 2015. Although the Fiscal Year
(FY) 2015 TTPSF full-year funding level
is unknown at this time, this notice of
funding availability solicits proposals
under the TTPSF for FY 2015. Section
202(e) of Title 23, U.S.C., provides that
funds are to be allocated based on an
identification and analysis of highway
safety issues and opportunities on tribal
lands, as determined by the Secretary,
on application of the Indian tribal
governments for eligible projects
described in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4). Eligible
projects described in section 148(a)(4)
include strategies, activities, and
projects on a public road that are
consistent with a State strategic
highway safety plan and correct or
improve a hazardous road location or
feature, or address a highway safety
problem.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
Section 202(e) further specifies that in
applying for TTPSF, an Indian tribal
government, in cooperation with the
Secretary of the Interior and, as
appropriate, with a State, local
government, or metropolitan planning
organization, shall select projects from
the transportation improvement
program, subject to the approval of the
Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of the Interior.
Upon award, TTPSF will be
administered the same way as all TTP
funds: FHWA Agreement tribes will
receive funds in accordance with their
Program Agreement through a
Referenced Funding Agreement (RFA);
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
Agreement tribes will receive their
funds through their BIA Regional Office;
and Compact tribes will receive their
funds through the Department of the
Interior’s Office of Self Governance.
Upon completion of a TTPSF project,
funds that are not expended are to be
recovered and returned to the TTPSF
funding pool to be made available for
the following TTPSF grant cycle.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for a TTPSF award, an
applicant must be a federally recognized
Indian tribe and the project must be an
Eligible Project.
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Applicants for TTPSF
discretionary grants are federally
recognized tribes identified on the list of
‘‘Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible
to Receive Services from the Bureau of
Indian Affairs’’ (published at 77 FR
47868). Other entities may partner with
a tribal government to submit an
application, but the Eligible Applicant
must be a federally recognized Indian
tribe. A tribe may submit more than one
application; however, only one project
may be included in each application.
Recipients of prior TTPSF funds may
submit applications during this current
round according to the selection criteria.
However, to be competitive, the
applicant should demonstrate the extent
to which the previously funded project
or projects has been able to meet
estimated project schedules and budget,
as well as the ability to realize the
outcomes for previous awards.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
There is no matching requirement for
the TTPSF. However, if the total amount
of funding requested for applications
rated ‘‘highly qualified’’ or ‘‘qualified’’
exceeds the amount of available
funding, FHWA will give priority
consideration to those projects that
show a commitment of other funding
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sources to complement the TTPSF
funding request. Therefore, leveraging a
TTPSF request with other funding
sources identified in Section E is
encouraged.
D. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package
Application package can be
downloaded from the TTPSF Web site:
https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/
safety/ttpsf.htm. Applicants may also
request a paper copy of this application
package by contacting Russell Garcia at
202–366–9815. For a Telephone Device
for the Deaf (TDD) please call 202–366–
3993. The application must be
submitted through ttpsf@dot.gov.
Applicants are encouraged to submit
applications in advance of the
application deadline; however,
applications will not be evaluated, and
awards will not be made until after the
application deadline.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Additional information, including
additional data, may be requested by
FHWA to clarify an application, but
FHWA encourages applicants to submit
the most relevant and complete
information the applicant can provide.
The FHWA also encourages applicants,
to the extent practicable, to provide data
and evidence of project merits in a form
that is publicly available or verifiable.
The applicants should include the
following information in their
applications:
i. Standard Form 424, Applications for
Federal Assistance
A complete application must consist
of the Standard Form 424 (SF 424)
available at https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/
programs/ttp/safety.
ii. Narrative (Attachment to SF 424)
Applicants must attach a
supplemental narrative to their
submission to successfully complete the
application process. The applicant must
include the supplemental narrative in
the attachments section of the SF 424
mandatory form.
The applicant must identify the
eligibility category for which the
applicant is seeking funds in the project
narrative. In addition, the applicant
should address each question or
statement in the application. It is
recommended that the applicant use
standard formatting (e.g., a singlespaced document, using a standard 12point font, such as Times New Roman,
with 1-inch margins) to prepare their
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
application narrative. An application
must include any information needed to
verify that the project meets the
statutory eligibility criteria in order for
the FHWA to evaluate the application
against TTPSF criteria.
Applicants should demonstrate the
responsiveness of their proposal to any
pertinent selection criteria with the
most relevant information that
applicants can provide, and
substantiated by data, regardless of
whether such information is specifically
requested, or identified, in the final
notice. Applicants should provide
evidence of the feasibility of achieving
certain project milestones, financial
capacity, and commitment in order to
support project readiness.
Consistent with the requirements for
an eligible highway safety improvement
project under 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4),
applicants must describe clearly how
the project would correct or improve a
hazardous road location or feature, or
would address a highway safety
problem. The application must include
supporting data.
For ease of review, FHWA
recommends that the project narrative
generally adhere to the following basic
outline, and include a table of contents,
project abstract, maps, and graphics:
a. Project Abstract: Describe project
work that would be completed under
the project, the hazardous road location
or feature or the highway safety problem
that the project would address, and
whether the project is a complete
project or part of a larger project with
prior investment (maximum five
sentences). The project abstract must
succinctly describe how this specific
request for TTPSF would be used to
complete the project.
b. Project Description: Include
information on the expected users of the
project, a description of the hazardous
road location or feature or the highway
safety problem that the project would
address, and how the project would
address these challenges;
c. Applicant information and
coordination with other entities: Identify
the Indian tribal government applying
for TTPSF, a description of cooperation
with other entities in selecting projects
from the TIP as required under 23
U.S.C. 202(e)(2), and information
regarding any other entities involved in
the project;
d. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of
Project Funds: Include information
about the amount of grant funding
requested for the project, availability/
commitment of funds sources and uses
of all project funds, total project costs,
percentage of project costs that would
be paid for with the TTPSF, and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
identity and percentage shares of all
parties providing funds for the project
(including Federal funds provided
under other programs);
e. Include a description of how the
proposal meets the Selection Criteria
identified in Section E, Subsection 1
Criteria.
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System
for Award Management (SAM)
The TTPSF requires applicants to be
either registered in SAM or provide
their Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) number with their application.
4. Submission Dates and Time
i. Deadline—Applications must be
submitted through ttpsf@dot.gov no
later than 5 p.m., e.t. on August 25, 2015
(the ‘‘application deadline’’).
ii. Applicants are encouraged to
submit applications in advance of the
application deadline; however,
applications will not be evaluated, and
awards will not be made until after the
application deadline.
iii. Upon submission of the
applications to ttpsf@dot.gov, the
applicants will receive automatic reply
confirming transmittal of the
application to the FHWA. Please contact
Russell Garcia at 202–366–9815, should
you not receive any confirmation from
the FHWA.
iv. Late Applications—Applications
received after the deadline will not be
considered except in the case of
unforeseen technical difficulties that are
beyond the applicant’s control. The
FHWA will consider late applications
on a case-by-case basis. Applicants are
encouraged to submit additional
information documenting the technical
difficulties experienced, including a
screen capture of any error messages
received.
5. Intergovernmental Review
The TTPSF is not subject to the
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
6. Funding Restrictions
There are no funding restrictions on
any applications. However, FHWA
anticipates high demand for this limited
amount of funding and encourages
applications with scalable requests that
allow more tribes to receive funding and
for requests that identify a commitment
of other funding sources to complement
the TTPSF funding request. Applicants
should demonstrate the capacity to
successfully implement the proposed
request in a timely manner, and ensure
that cost estimates and timelines to
complete deliverables are included in
their application.
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36887
7. Other Submission Requirements
Applications must be submitted
electronically to ttpsf@dot.gov.
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
The FHWA will award TTPSF funds
based on the selection criteria and
policy considerations as outlined below.
However, to be competitive, the
applicant should demonstrate the extent
to which a previously funded project or
projects has been able to meet estimated
project schedules and budget, as well as
the ability to realize the outcomes for
previous awards.
The FHWA shall give priority
consideration to eligible projects under
23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4) that fall within one
of the following four categories:
(1) Safety plans and safety planning
activities;
(2) engineering improvements;
(3) enforcement and emergency
services improvements; and
(4) education programs.
The priority categories were
determined in consultation with the
Tribal Transportation Program
Coordinating Committee (TTPCC) and
are intended to strengthen safety plans
and safety planning activities in tribal
transportation while also directing
resources to needed safety
improvements. The categories are also
consistent with the FHWA State
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (State
SHSP) for Indian Lands which has as its
mission to, ‘‘Implement effective
transportation safety programs to save
lives while respecting Native American
culture and tradition by fostering
communication, coordination,
collaboration, and cooperation.’’ These
categories are also consistent with the
Tribal Safety Management
Implementation Plan (TSMIP). The
TSMIP recognizes that, ‘‘tribal safety
plans are an essential component and an
effective planning tool for prioritizing
and implementing safety solutions.’’
The TSMIP also states that ‘‘reducing
highway fatalities and serious injuries
with any sustained success requires that
all four elements (4Es) of highway safety
be addressed—engineering,
enforcement, education, and emergency
services. A Tribal Safety Program,
whether large or small, should work to
address the 4Es, and its foundation,
data.’’
The FHWA will allocate the TTPSF
among the four categories as follows: (1)
Safety plans and safety planning
activities (40 percent); (2) engineering
improvements (30 percent); (3)
enforcement and emergency services
improvements (20 percent); and (4)
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
36888
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
education programs (10 percent). These
funding goals were established with the
TTPCC and will be reviewed annually
and may be adjusted to reflect current
tribal transportation safety priorities and
needs. These proposed allocation
amounts provide substantial funding for
tribal safety plans to reflect the strong
need that has been identified in this
area and to ensure that all tribes have an
opportunity to assess their safety needs
and prioritize safety projects. The
remaining proposed allocation amounts
were established based on the
significant need for transportation
related capital improvement projects,
while still allowing for applications that
would cover all 4Es of safety. Because
these percentages are only goals, they
may be further adjusted to reflect the
amounts requested in the applications
received in response to this notice.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning
Activities (Funding Goal 40 Percent of
TTPSF)
The development of a tribal safety
plan that is data driven, identifies
transportation safety issues, prioritizes
activities, is coordinated with the State
SHSP, and promotes a comprehensive
approach to addressing safety needs by
including all 4Es, is a critical step in
improving highway safety. Additional
information on developing a tribal
safety plan can be found at: https://
flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/.
Accordingly, FHWA will award
TTPSF for developing and updating
tribal safety plans, and other safety
planning activities. Example projects are
listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can
be found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following
criteria in the evaluation of TTPSF
funding requests for tribal safety plans:
(1) Development of a tribal safety plan
where none currently exists, and (2) age
or status of an existing tribal safety plan.
The FHWA will use the following
criteria in the evaluation of TTPSF
funding requests for safety planning
activities: (1) Inclusion of the activity in
a completed State SHSP or tribal
transportation safety plan that is no
more than 5 years old; (2) submission of
supporting data that demonstrates the
need for the activity; (3) leveraging of
private or other public funding; or (4)
the project is part of a comprehensive
approach to safety which includes other
safety efforts.
Examples of eligible safety planning
activities include, but are not limited to:
• Collection, analysis, and
improvement of safety data; and
• Road safety assessments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
ii. Engineering Improvements (Funding
Goal 30 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23
U.S.C. 148(a)(4) which can be found at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/
title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following
criteria in the evaluation of funding
requests for engineering improvements:
(1) Inclusion of the activity in a
completed State SHSP or tribal
transportation safety plan that is no
more than 5 years old; (2) inclusion of
the activity in a completed road safety
audit, engineering study, impact
assessment or other engineering
document; (3) submission of supporting
data that demonstrates the need for the
project; (4) ownership of the facility; (5)
leveraging of private or other public
funding; (6) years since the tribe has last
received funding for an TTPSF
engineering improvement project; or (7)
the project is part of a comprehensive
approach to safety which includes other
safety efforts.
Examples of eligible engineering
improvement projects include, but are
not limited to:
• Intersection safety improvements;
• Pavement and shoulder widening
(including addition of a passing lane to
remedy an unsafe condition);
• Installation of rumble strips or
another warning device, if the rumble
strips or other warning devices do not
adversely affect the safety or mobility of
bicyclists and pedestrians, including
persons with disabilities;
• Installation of a skid-resistant
surface at an intersection or other
location with a high frequency of
crashes;
• Improvements for pedestrian or
bicyclist safety or safety of persons with
disabilities;
• Construction and improvement of
railway-highway grade crossing safety
feature;
• Installation of protective devices;
• Construction of a traffic calming
feature;
• Elimination of a roadside hazard;
• Installation, replacement, and other
improvement of highway signage and
pavement markings, or a project to
maintain minimum levels of
retroreflectivity that addresses highway
safety;
• Installation of a traffic control or
other warning device at a location with
high crash potential;
• Installation of guardrails, barriers
(including barriers between
construction work zones and traffic
lanes for the safety of road users and
workers), and crash attenuators;
• The addition or retrofitting of
structures or other measures to
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
eliminate or reduce crashes involving
vehicles and wildlife;
• Installation of yellow-green signs
and signals at pedestrian and bicycle
crossings and in school zones;
• Construction and operational
improvements on high risk rural roads;
• Geometric improvements to a road
for safety purposes that improve safety;
• Roadway safety infrastructure
improvements consistent with the
recommendations included in the
FHWA publication entitled ‘‘Highway
Design Handbook for Older Drivers and
Pedestrians’’;
• Truck parking facilities eligible for
funding under section 1401 of MAP–21;
• Systemic safety improvements; and
• Transportation-related safety
projects for modes such as trails, docks,
boardwalks, ice roads, and others that
are eligible for TTP funds.
iii. Enforcement and Emergency
Services Improvements (Funding Goal
20 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23
U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be found at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/
title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following
criteria in the evaluation of funding
requests for enforcement and emergency
services improvements: (1) Inclusion of
the activity in a completed State SHSP
or tribal transportation safety plan that
is no more than 5 years old; (2)
submission of supporting data that
demonstrates the need for the project;
(3) leveraging of private or other public
funding; or (4) the project is part of a
comprehensive approach to safety
which includes other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible enforcement and
emergency services improvement
activities include, but are not limited to:
• The conduct of a model traffic
enforcement activity at a railwayhighway crossing;
• Installation of a priority control
system for emergency vehicles at
signalized intersections; and
• Planning integrated interoperable
emergency communications equipment,
operational activities, or traffic
enforcement activities (including police
assistance) relating to work zone safety.
iv. Education Programs (Funding Goal
10 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23
U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be found at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/
title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following
criteria in the evaluation of funding
requests for education projects: (1)
Inclusion of the activity in a completed
State SHSP or tribal transportation
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
safety plan that is no more than 5 years
old; (2) submission of supporting data
that demonstrates the need for the
project; (3) leveraging of private or other
public funding; or (4) the project is part
of a comprehensive approach to safety
which includes other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible education
activities include, but are not limited to:
• Safety Management System
Implementation Plan activities;
• Public service announcements; and
• Programs implemented to inform
the public or address behaviors that
affect transportation safety.
2. Review and Selection Process
The TTPSF grant applications will be
evaluated in accordance with evaluation
process discussed below. The FHWA
will establish an evaluation team to
review each application received by
FHWA prior to the application deadline.
The FHWA will lead the evaluation
team, which will include members from
the BIA. The evaluation team will
include technical and professional staff
with relevant experience and expertise
in tribal transportation safety issues.
The evaluation team will be responsible
for evaluating and rating all eligible
projects. The evaluation team will
review each application against the
evaluation criteria in each of the four
categories and assign a rating of ‘‘Highly
Qualified,’’ ‘‘Qualified,’’ or ‘‘Not
Qualified’’ to each application for the
FHWA Administrator’s review. The
FHWA Administrator will forward
funding recommendations to the Office
of the Secretary. The final funding
decisions will be made by the Secretary
of Transportation.
All applications will be evaluated and
assigned a rating of ‘‘Highly Qualified,’’
‘‘Qualified,’’ or ‘‘Not Qualified.’’ The
ratings, as defined below, are proposed
within each priority funding category as
follows:
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning
Activities 1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Development of Tribal Safety Plans
a. Highly Qualified: Requests (up to a
maximum of $12,500) for development
1 The development of a tribal safety plan is the
cornerstone for all future tribal safety activities
including education, enforcement and emergency
services, engineering improvements and other
safety planning activities. Because of the
importance of developing, completing or updating
a tribal safety plan and for this one category only,
applications will be deemed either ‘‘highly
qualified’’ or ‘‘not qualified.’’ All applications to
develop a new tribal safety plan, update an
incomplete safety plan, or update an existing tribal
safety plan more than 3 years old are deemed to be
highly qualified. Applications not directed to
developing, updating or completing existing a tribal
safety plan or which address a plan not older than
3 years are deemed ‘‘Not Qualified.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
of new tribal safety plans or to update
incomplete tribal safety plans; and
requests (up to a maximum of $7,500) to
update existing tribal safety plans that
are more than 3 years old.
b. Not Qualified: Projects that do not
meet the eligibility requirements; any
request to update an existing tribal
safety plan that is less than 3 years old.
II. Other Safety Planning Activities
a. Highly Qualified: Requests for other
safety planning activities that are in a
current State SHSP or tribal safety plan
that is not more than 5 years old;
submission of data that demonstrates
the need for the activities; significant
leveraging of private or public funding;
and are part of a comprehensive
approach to safety which includes other
safety efforts. If the total amount of
funding requested for applications rated
as ‘‘highly qualified’’ exceeds the
amount of available funding, FHWA
will give priority funding consideration
to funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must
be a transportation safety project that
has independent utility (i.e., is usable
and a reasonable expenditure of Federal
funds even if no other improvements are
made in the area). In other words,
FHWA may fund an independent
component of a project, instead of the
full project described in the application,
only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of
that component.
Applicants should be aware that
while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions
because they do not lead to construction
or have potentially significant traffic or
other impacts, depending on the
relationship between the overall project
and the independent component, the
NEPA review for the independent
component may have to include
evaluation of all project components as
connected, similar, or cumulative
actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25.
Priority consideration will also be given
to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to
complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
b. Qualified: Requests for other safety
planning activities that are in a current
State SHSP or tribal safety plan that is
more than 5 years old; submission of
some data that demonstrates the need
for the activity; some leveraging of
private or public funding; and is part of
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36889
a comprehensive approach to safety
which includes other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘qualified’’ exceeds the amount of
available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be
eligible, a component must meet
eligibility criteria and must be a
transportation safety project that has
independent utility (i.e., is usable and a
reasonable expenditure of Federal funds
even if no other improvements are made
in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that
component provides transportation
benefits and will be ready for its
intended use upon completion of that
component. Applicants should be aware
that while it is anticipated that most of
these projects will be categorical
exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially
significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent
component, the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) review for the
independent component may have to
include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40
CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will
also be given to funding requests that
include a commitment of other funding
sources to complement the TTPSF, and
those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not
meet the eligibility requirements;
projects that are not included in a State
SHSP or tribal safety plan.
ii. Engineering Improvements
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in
a current State SHSP or tribal safety
plan that is less than 5 years old; data
included in the application that directly
supports the project; project is in a
current road safety audit, impact
assessment, or other safety engineering
study; projects located on a BIA or tribal
facility; significant leverage with other
funding; the tribe has not received
funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project in more than
10 years or the project is part of a
comprehensive approach to safety
which includes three or more other
safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘highly qualified’’ exceeds the amount
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
36890
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must
be a transportation improvement that
has independent utility (i.e., is usable
and a reasonable expenditure of Federal
funds even if no other improvements are
made in the area). In other words,
FHWA may fund an independent
component of a project, instead of the
full project described in the application,
only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of
that component’s construction.
Applicants should be aware that,
depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent
component, the NEPA review for the
independent component may have to
include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40
CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will
also be given to funding requests that
include a commitment of other funding
sources to complement the TTPSF, and
those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a
current State SHSP or tribal safety plan,
but the plan is more than 5 years old;
some data included in the application
that supports the project; project is in a
road safety audit, impact assessment, or
other safety engineering study that is
more than 5 years old; project is located
on a transportation facility not owned
by a tribe or BIA; some leveraging with
other funding; the tribe has not received
funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project in the last 2
to 10 years or the projects is part of a
coordinated approach with one to two
other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘qualified’’ exceeds the amount of
available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be
eligible, a component must meet
eligibility criteria and must be a
transportation improvement that has
independent utility (i.e., is usable and a
reasonable expenditure of Federal funds
even if no other improvements are made
in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that
component provides transportation
benefits and will be ready for its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
intended use upon completion of that
component’s construction. Applicants
should be aware that, depending on the
relationship between the overall project
and the independent component, the
NEPA review for the independent
component may have to include
evaluation of all project components as
connected, similar, or cumulative
actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25.
Priority consideration will also be given
to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to
complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not
meet the eligibility requirements; are
not included in a State SHSP or tribal
safety plan; no data provided in the
application to support the request; are
not included in a road safety audit,
impact assessment, or other safety
engineering study; have received
funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project within the
last 2 years or do not have a
comprehensive approach to safety with
other partners.
iii. Enforcement and Emergency
Services
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in
a current State SHSP or tribal safety
plan that is less than 5 years old; data
included in the application that directly
supports the requested project;
significant leverage with other funding
or are part of a comprehensive approach
to safety, including three or more other
safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘highly qualified’’ exceeds the amount
of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must
be a transportation safety project that
has independent utility (i.e., is usable
and a reasonable expenditure of Federal
funds even if no other improvements are
made in the area). In other words,
FHWA may fund an independent
component of a project, instead of the
full project described in the application,
only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of
that component. Applicants should be
aware that while it is anticipated that
most of these projects will be categorical
exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially
significant traffic or other impacts,
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent
component, the NEPA review for the
independent component may have to
include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40
CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will
also be given to funding requests that
include a commitment of other funding
sources to complement the TTPSF, and
those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a
current State SHSP or tribal safety plan
but the plan is more than 5 years old;
some data included in the application
that supports the project; some
leveraging with other funding or are
coordinated with one to two other safety
efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘qualified’’ exceeds the amount of
available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be
eligible, a component must meet
eligibility criteria and must be a
transportation safety project that has
independent utility (i.e., is usable and a
reasonable expenditure of Federal funds
even if no other improvements are made
in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that
component provides transportation
benefits and will be ready for its
intended use upon completion of that
component. Applicants should be aware
that while it is anticipated that most of
these projects will be categorical
exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially
significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent
component, the NEPA review for the
independent component may have to
include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40
CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will
also be given to funding requests that
include a commitment of other funding
sources to complement the TTPSF, and
those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not
meet the eligibility requirements; are
not included in a State SHSP or tribal
safety plan; no data provided in the
application that supports the project;
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
does not have a comprehensive
approach to safety with other partners.
iv. Education Programs
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in
a current State SHSP or tribal safety
plan that is less than 5 years old; data
included in the application that directly
supports the requested project;
significant leverage with other funding
or are part of a comprehensive approach
to safety including three or more other
safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘highly qualified’’ exceeds the amount
of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must
be a transportation safety project that
has independent utility (i.e., is usable
and a reasonable expenditure of Federal
funds even if no other improvements are
made in the area). In other words,
FHWA may fund an independent
component of a project, instead of the
full project described in the application,
only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of
that component. Applicants should be
aware that while it is anticipated that
most of these projects will be categorical
exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially
significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent
component, the NEPA review for the
independent component may have to
include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40
CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will
also be given to funding requests that
include a commitment of other funding
sources to complement the TTPSF, and
those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a
current State SHSP or tribal safety plan
but the plan is more than 5 years old;
some data included in the application
that supports the project; some
leveraging with other funding or are
coordinated with one to two other safety
efforts.
If the total amount of funding
requested for applications rated as
‘‘qualified’’ exceeds the amount of
available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jun 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
eligible, a component must meet
eligibility criteria and must be a
transportation safety project that has
independent utility (i.e., is usable and a
reasonable expenditure of Federal funds
even if no other improvements are made
in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that
component provides transportation
benefits and will be ready for its
intended use upon completion of that
component. Applicants should be aware
that while it is anticipated that most of
these projects will be categorical
exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially
significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent
component, the NEPA review for the
independent component may have to
include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40
CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will
also be given to funding requests that
include a commitment of other funding
sources to complement the TTPSF, and
those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a
timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not
meet the eligibility requirements; are
not included in a State SHSP or tribal
safety plan; no data provided in the
application that supports the project
does not have a comprehensive
approach to safety with other partners.
F. Federal Award Administration
Information
1. Federal Award Notice
The FHWA will announce the
awarded projects by posting a list of
selected projects at https://
flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/.
Following the announcement,
successful applicants and unsuccessful
applicants will be notified separately.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
All awards will be administered
pursuant to the Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
found in 2 CFR part 200. Applicable
Federal laws, rules, and regulations set
forth in title 23, U.S.C., and title 23 of
the CFR, apply.
The TTPSF will be administered the
same way as all TTP funds: FHWA
Agreement tribes will receive funds in
accordance with their Program
Agreement through a RFA; BIA
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
36891
Agreement tribes will receive their
funds through their BIA Regional Office;
and Compact tribes will receive their
funds through the Department of the
Interior’s Office of Self Governance.
3. Reporting
Required reporting follows the
requirements for regular TTP funds.
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
For further information concerning
this notice please contact Russell
Garcia, TTPSF Program Manager, via
email at russell.garcia@dot.gov; by
telephone at 202–366–9815; or by mail
at Federal Highway Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are
from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For legal questions, please contact Ms.
Vivian Philbin, Office of the Chief
Counsel, by telephone at (720) 963–
3445; by email at vivian.philbin@
dot.gov; or by mail at Federal Highway
Administration, Central Federal Lands
Highway Division, 12300 West Dakota
Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80228. Office
hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
m.t., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business
Information
All information submitted as part of
or in support of any application shall
use publicly available data or data that
can be made public and methodologies
that are accepted by industry practice
and standards, to the extent possible. If
the application includes information
you consider to be a trade secret or
confidential commercial or financial
information, the applicant should do the
following: (1) Note on the front cover
that the submission ‘‘Contains
Confidential Business Information
(CBI)’’; (2) mark each affected page
‘‘CBI,’’ and (3) highlight or otherwise
denote the CBI portions.
Authority: Section 1119 of Pub. L. 112–
141; 23 U.S.C. 202(e).
Issued on: June 19, 2015.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–15709 Filed 6–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36885-36891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Funding Availability for the Tribal Transportation
Program Safety Funding
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of funding and requests
grant applications for FHWA's Tribal Transportation Program Safety
Funds (TTPSF). In addition, this notice identifies selection criteria,
application requirements, and technical assistance during the grant
solicitation period for the TTPSF.
The TTPSF is authorized within the Tribal Transportation Program
(TTP) under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-
21), as extended. The FHWA will distribute these funds as described in
this notice on a competitive basis in a manner consistent with the
selection criteria.
DATES: Applications must be submitted through ttpsf@dot.gov no later
than 5 p.m., e.t. on August 25, 2015 (the ``application deadline'').
Applicants are encouraged to submit applications in advance of the
application deadline; however, applications will not be evaluated, and
awards will not be made until after the application deadline.
The FHWA plans to conduct outreach regarding the TTPSF in the form
of a Webinar on July 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., e.t. To join the Webinar,
please click this link then enter the room as a guest: https://connectdot.connectsolutions.com/tribaltrans/. The audio portion of the
Webinar can be accessed from this teleconference line: TOLL FREE 1-888-
251-2909; ACCESS CODE 4442306. The Webinar will be recorded and posted
on FHWA's Web site at: https://www.flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/. A TDD is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing at 202-366-3993.
ADDRESSES: Applications must be submitted electronically to
ttpsf@dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning
this notice please contact Russell Garcia, TTPSF Program Manager, via
email at russell.garcia@dot.gov; by telephone at 202-366-9815; or by
mail at Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For legal
questions, please contact Ms. Vivian Philbin, Office of the Chief
Counsel, by telephone at (720) 963-3445; by email at
vivian.philbin@dot.gov; or by mail at Federal Highway Administration,
Central Federal Lands Highway Division, 12300 West Dakota Avenue,
Lakewood, CO 80228. Office hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. m.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2013, FHWA published the first
notice of funding availability for the TTPSF (78 FR 47480). On November
13, 2013, FHWA awarded 183 tribes a total of $8.6 million for 193
projects. On May 14, 2014, FHWA published the second notice of funding
availability for the TTPSF (78 FR 47480). On March 10, 2015, FHWA
awarded 82 tribes a total of $8.5 million for 94 projects to improve
transportation safety on tribal lands. The FHWA is publishing this
third notice to announce the availability of an additional round of
funding and request grant applications.
Table of Contents
A. Program Description
B. Federal Award Information
C. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
D. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management
(SAM)
4. Submission Dates and Time
5. Intergovernmental Review
6. Funding Restrictions
7. Other Submission Requirements
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities (funding goal 40
percent of TTPSF)
ii. Engineering Improvements (funding goal 30 percent of TTPSF)
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services Improvements (funding
goal 20 percent of TTPSF)
iv. Education Programs (funding goal 10 percent of TTPSF)
2. Review and Selection Process
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities
ii. Engineering Improvements
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services
iv. Education Programs
F. Federal Award Administration Information
1. Federal Award Notice
2. Administrative and National Policy
3. Reporting
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business Information
A. Program Description
Since the TTPSF was created under MAP-21, $17.1 million has been
awarded to 265 Indian tribes for 287 projects to address safety issues
in Indian country over two rounds of competitive grants. The intent of
the TTPSF is to address the prevention and reduction of death or
serious injuries in transportation related crashes on tribal lands
where statistics are consistently higher than the rest of the nation as
a whole.
The TTPSF emphasizes the development of Strategic Transportation
Safety Plans using a data driven process as a means for tribes to
determine how transportation safety needs will be addressed in tribal
communities. Tribal Transportation Safety Plans are a tool used to
identify risk factors that lead to serious injury or death and organize
various entities to strategically reduce risk; projects submitted must
be tied to a comprehensive safety strategy and be based on incident
history (i.e., data).
Throughout the past two grant cycles, TTPSF awards have supported
safety
[[Page 36886]]
planning, engineering, enforcement and emergency services, and
education projects. Successful TTPSF projects leverage resources,
encourage partnership, and have the data to support the applicants'
approach in addressing the prevention and reduction of death or serious
injuries in transportation related crashes. A listing of the safety
projects/activities that were previously submitted by the Tribes and
awarded TTP safety funds, as well as additional safety related
information can be found on the TTP Safety Web site at https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/ttpsf.htm.
In FY 2015, the TTPSF will continue to fund projects of all
eligible types, including projects that are highway safety improvement
projects eligible under the Highway Safety Improvement Program as
described in 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 148(a)(4), in the same four
categories identified in the previous two rounds: (1) Safety plans and
safety planning activities (40 percent); (2) engineering improvements
(30 percent); (3) enforcement and emergency services improvements (20
percent); and (4) education programs (10 percent).
The TTPSF Web site includes a series of tools to help an applicant
prepare a successful grant application. Please explore the grant
application tools at: https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/ttpsf.htm.
B. Federal Award Information
The MAP-21 (Pub. L. 112-141) authorizes TTPSF as a set aside of not
more than 2 percent of the funds made available under the TTP for FY
2013 and 2014. The Highway Transportation Funding Act of 2014 (Pub. L.
113-159) extended the provisions of MAP-21, including the TTPSF set
aside, through May 31, 2015. Although the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 TTPSF
full-year funding level is unknown at this time, this notice of funding
availability solicits proposals under the TTPSF for FY 2015. Section
202(e) of Title 23, U.S.C., provides that funds are to be allocated
based on an identification and analysis of highway safety issues and
opportunities on tribal lands, as determined by the Secretary, on
application of the Indian tribal governments for eligible projects
described in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4). Eligible projects described in
section 148(a)(4) include strategies, activities, and projects on a
public road that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety
plan and correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature, or
address a highway safety problem.
Section 202(e) further specifies that in applying for TTPSF, an
Indian tribal government, in cooperation with the Secretary of the
Interior and, as appropriate, with a State, local government, or
metropolitan planning organization, shall select projects from the
transportation improvement program, subject to the approval of the
Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of the Interior.
Upon award, TTPSF will be administered the same way as all TTP
funds: FHWA Agreement tribes will receive funds in accordance with
their Program Agreement through a Referenced Funding Agreement (RFA);
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Agreement tribes will receive their
funds through their BIA Regional Office; and Compact tribes will
receive their funds through the Department of the Interior's Office of
Self Governance. Upon completion of a TTPSF project, funds that are not
expended are to be recovered and returned to the TTPSF funding pool to
be made available for the following TTPSF grant cycle.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for a TTPSF award, an applicant must be a federally
recognized Indian tribe and the project must be an Eligible Project.
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Applicants for TTPSF discretionary grants are federally
recognized tribes identified on the list of ``Indian Entities
Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services from the Bureau of Indian
Affairs'' (published at 77 FR 47868). Other entities may partner with a
tribal government to submit an application, but the Eligible Applicant
must be a federally recognized Indian tribe. A tribe may submit more
than one application; however, only one project may be included in each
application.
Recipients of prior TTPSF funds may submit applications during this
current round according to the selection criteria. However, to be
competitive, the applicant should demonstrate the extent to which the
previously funded project or projects has been able to meet estimated
project schedules and budget, as well as the ability to realize the
outcomes for previous awards.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
There is no matching requirement for the TTPSF. However, if the
total amount of funding requested for applications rated ``highly
qualified'' or ``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding,
FHWA will give priority consideration to those projects that show a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF funding
request. Therefore, leveraging a TTPSF request with other funding
sources identified in Section E is encouraged.
D. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
Application package can be downloaded from the TTPSF Web site:
https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/ttpsf.htm. Applicants may
also request a paper copy of this application package by contacting
Russell Garcia at 202-366-9815. For a Telephone Device for the Deaf
(TDD) please call 202-366-3993. The application must be submitted
through ttpsf@dot.gov. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications
in advance of the application deadline; however, applications will not
be evaluated, and awards will not be made until after the application
deadline.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Additional information, including additional data, may be requested
by FHWA to clarify an application, but FHWA encourages applicants to
submit the most relevant and complete information the applicant can
provide. The FHWA also encourages applicants, to the extent
practicable, to provide data and evidence of project merits in a form
that is publicly available or verifiable.
The applicants should include the following information in their
applications:
i. Standard Form 424, Applications for Federal Assistance
A complete application must consist of the Standard Form 424 (SF
424) available at https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety.
ii. Narrative (Attachment to SF 424)
Applicants must attach a supplemental narrative to their submission
to successfully complete the application process. The applicant must
include the supplemental narrative in the attachments section of the SF
424 mandatory form.
The applicant must identify the eligibility category for which the
applicant is seeking funds in the project narrative. In addition, the
applicant should address each question or statement in the application.
It is recommended that the applicant use standard formatting (e.g., a
single-spaced document, using a standard 12-point font, such as Times
New Roman, with 1-inch margins) to prepare their
[[Page 36887]]
application narrative. An application must include any information
needed to verify that the project meets the statutory eligibility
criteria in order for the FHWA to evaluate the application against
TTPSF criteria.
Applicants should demonstrate the responsiveness of their proposal
to any pertinent selection criteria with the most relevant information
that applicants can provide, and substantiated by data, regardless of
whether such information is specifically requested, or identified, in
the final notice. Applicants should provide evidence of the feasibility
of achieving certain project milestones, financial capacity, and
commitment in order to support project readiness.
Consistent with the requirements for an eligible highway safety
improvement project under 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), applicants must describe
clearly how the project would correct or improve a hazardous road
location or feature, or would address a highway safety problem. The
application must include supporting data.
For ease of review, FHWA recommends that the project narrative
generally adhere to the following basic outline, and include a table of
contents, project abstract, maps, and graphics:
a. Project Abstract: Describe project work that would be completed
under the project, the hazardous road location or feature or the
highway safety problem that the project would address, and whether the
project is a complete project or part of a larger project with prior
investment (maximum five sentences). The project abstract must
succinctly describe how this specific request for TTPSF would be used
to complete the project.
b. Project Description: Include information on the expected users
of the project, a description of the hazardous road location or feature
or the highway safety problem that the project would address, and how
the project would address these challenges;
c. Applicant information and coordination with other entities:
Identify the Indian tribal government applying for TTPSF, a description
of cooperation with other entities in selecting projects from the TIP
as required under 23 U.S.C. 202(e)(2), and information regarding any
other entities involved in the project;
d. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds: Include
information about the amount of grant funding requested for the
project, availability/commitment of funds sources and uses of all
project funds, total project costs, percentage of project costs that
would be paid for with the TTPSF, and the identity and percentage
shares of all parties providing funds for the project (including
Federal funds provided under other programs);
e. Include a description of how the proposal meets the Selection
Criteria identified in Section E, Subsection 1 Criteria.
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)
The TTPSF requires applicants to be either registered in SAM or
provide their Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
application.
4. Submission Dates and Time
i. Deadline--Applications must be submitted through ttpsf@dot.gov
no later than 5 p.m., e.t. on August 25, 2015 (the ``application
deadline'').
ii. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications in advance of
the application deadline; however, applications will not be evaluated,
and awards will not be made until after the application deadline.
iii. Upon submission of the applications to ttpsf@dot.gov, the
applicants will receive automatic reply confirming transmittal of the
application to the FHWA. Please contact Russell Garcia at 202-366-9815,
should you not receive any confirmation from the FHWA.
iv. Late Applications--Applications received after the deadline
will not be considered except in the case of unforeseen technical
difficulties that are beyond the applicant's control. The FHWA will
consider late applications on a case-by-case basis. Applicants are
encouraged to submit additional information documenting the technical
difficulties experienced, including a screen capture of any error
messages received.
5. Intergovernmental Review
The TTPSF is not subject to the Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
6. Funding Restrictions
There are no funding restrictions on any applications. However,
FHWA anticipates high demand for this limited amount of funding and
encourages applications with scalable requests that allow more tribes
to receive funding and for requests that identify a commitment of other
funding sources to complement the TTPSF funding request. Applicants
should demonstrate the capacity to successfully implement the proposed
request in a timely manner, and ensure that cost estimates and
timelines to complete deliverables are included in their application.
7. Other Submission Requirements
Applications must be submitted electronically to ttpsf@dot.gov.
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
The FHWA will award TTPSF funds based on the selection criteria and
policy considerations as outlined below. However, to be competitive,
the applicant should demonstrate the extent to which a previously
funded project or projects has been able to meet estimated project
schedules and budget, as well as the ability to realize the outcomes
for previous awards.
The FHWA shall give priority consideration to eligible projects
under 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4) that fall within one of the following four
categories:
(1) Safety plans and safety planning activities;
(2) engineering improvements;
(3) enforcement and emergency services improvements; and
(4) education programs.
The priority categories were determined in consultation with the
Tribal Transportation Program Coordinating Committee (TTPCC) and are
intended to strengthen safety plans and safety planning activities in
tribal transportation while also directing resources to needed safety
improvements. The categories are also consistent with the FHWA State
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (State SHSP) for Indian Lands which has
as its mission to, ``Implement effective transportation safety programs
to save lives while respecting Native American culture and tradition by
fostering communication, coordination, collaboration, and
cooperation.'' These categories are also consistent with the Tribal
Safety Management Implementation Plan (TSMIP). The TSMIP recognizes
that, ``tribal safety plans are an essential component and an effective
planning tool for prioritizing and implementing safety solutions.'' The
TSMIP also states that ``reducing highway fatalities and serious
injuries with any sustained success requires that all four elements
(4Es) of highway safety be addressed--engineering, enforcement,
education, and emergency services. A Tribal Safety Program, whether
large or small, should work to address the 4Es, and its foundation,
data.''
The FHWA will allocate the TTPSF among the four categories as
follows: (1) Safety plans and safety planning activities (40 percent);
(2) engineering improvements (30 percent); (3) enforcement and
emergency services improvements (20 percent); and (4)
[[Page 36888]]
education programs (10 percent). These funding goals were established
with the TTPCC and will be reviewed annually and may be adjusted to
reflect current tribal transportation safety priorities and needs.
These proposed allocation amounts provide substantial funding for
tribal safety plans to reflect the strong need that has been identified
in this area and to ensure that all tribes have an opportunity to
assess their safety needs and prioritize safety projects. The remaining
proposed allocation amounts were established based on the significant
need for transportation related capital improvement projects, while
still allowing for applications that would cover all 4Es of safety.
Because these percentages are only goals, they may be further adjusted
to reflect the amounts requested in the applications received in
response to this notice.
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities (Funding Goal 40 Percent
of TTPSF)
The development of a tribal safety plan that is data driven,
identifies transportation safety issues, prioritizes activities, is
coordinated with the State SHSP, and promotes a comprehensive approach
to addressing safety needs by including all 4Es, is a critical step in
improving highway safety. Additional information on developing a tribal
safety plan can be found at: https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/.
Accordingly, FHWA will award TTPSF for developing and updating
tribal safety plans, and other safety planning activities. Example
projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be found at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of TTPSF
funding requests for tribal safety plans: (1) Development of a tribal
safety plan where none currently exists, and (2) age or status of an
existing tribal safety plan.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of TTPSF
funding requests for safety planning activities: (1) Inclusion of the
activity in a completed State SHSP or tribal transportation safety plan
that is no more than 5 years old; (2) submission of supporting data
that demonstrates the need for the activity; (3) leveraging of private
or other public funding; or (4) the project is part of a comprehensive
approach to safety which includes other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible safety planning activities include, but are
not limited to:
Collection, analysis, and improvement of safety data; and
Road safety assessments.
ii. Engineering Improvements (Funding Goal 30 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4) which can be
found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of
funding requests for engineering improvements: (1) Inclusion of the
activity in a completed State SHSP or tribal transportation safety plan
that is no more than 5 years old; (2) inclusion of the activity in a
completed road safety audit, engineering study, impact assessment or
other engineering document; (3) submission of supporting data that
demonstrates the need for the project; (4) ownership of the facility;
(5) leveraging of private or other public funding; (6) years since the
tribe has last received funding for an TTPSF engineering improvement
project; or (7) the project is part of a comprehensive approach to
safety which includes other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible engineering improvement projects include, but
are not limited to:
Intersection safety improvements;
Pavement and shoulder widening (including addition of a
passing lane to remedy an unsafe condition);
Installation of rumble strips or another warning device,
if the rumble strips or other warning devices do not adversely affect
the safety or mobility of bicyclists and pedestrians, including persons
with disabilities;
Installation of a skid-resistant surface at an
intersection or other location with a high frequency of crashes;
Improvements for pedestrian or bicyclist safety or safety
of persons with disabilities;
Construction and improvement of railway-highway grade
crossing safety feature;
Installation of protective devices;
Construction of a traffic calming feature;
Elimination of a roadside hazard;
Installation, replacement, and other improvement of
highway signage and pavement markings, or a project to maintain minimum
levels of retroreflectivity that addresses highway safety;
Installation of a traffic control or other warning device
at a location with high crash potential;
Installation of guardrails, barriers (including barriers
between construction work zones and traffic lanes for the safety of
road users and workers), and crash attenuators;
The addition or retrofitting of structures or other
measures to eliminate or reduce crashes involving vehicles and
wildlife;
Installation of yellow-green signs and signals at
pedestrian and bicycle crossings and in school zones;
Construction and operational improvements on high risk
rural roads;
Geometric improvements to a road for safety purposes that
improve safety;
Roadway safety infrastructure improvements consistent with
the recommendations included in the FHWA publication entitled ``Highway
Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians'';
Truck parking facilities eligible for funding under
section 1401 of MAP-21;
Systemic safety improvements; and
Transportation-related safety projects for modes such as
trails, docks, boardwalks, ice roads, and others that are eligible for
TTP funds.
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services Improvements (Funding Goal 20
Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be
found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of
funding requests for enforcement and emergency services improvements:
(1) Inclusion of the activity in a completed State SHSP or tribal
transportation safety plan that is no more than 5 years old; (2)
submission of supporting data that demonstrates the need for the
project; (3) leveraging of private or other public funding; or (4) the
project is part of a comprehensive approach to safety which includes
other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible enforcement and emergency services improvement
activities include, but are not limited to:
The conduct of a model traffic enforcement activity at a
railway-highway crossing;
Installation of a priority control system for emergency
vehicles at signalized intersections; and
Planning integrated interoperable emergency communications
equipment, operational activities, or traffic enforcement activities
(including police assistance) relating to work zone safety.
iv. Education Programs (Funding Goal 10 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be
found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of
funding requests for education projects: (1) Inclusion of the activity
in a completed State SHSP or tribal transportation
[[Page 36889]]
safety plan that is no more than 5 years old; (2) submission of
supporting data that demonstrates the need for the project; (3)
leveraging of private or other public funding; or (4) the project is
part of a comprehensive approach to safety which includes other safety
efforts.
Examples of eligible education activities include, but are not
limited to:
Safety Management System Implementation Plan activities;
Public service announcements; and
Programs implemented to inform the public or address
behaviors that affect transportation safety.
2. Review and Selection Process
The TTPSF grant applications will be evaluated in accordance with
evaluation process discussed below. The FHWA will establish an
evaluation team to review each application received by FHWA prior to
the application deadline. The FHWA will lead the evaluation team, which
will include members from the BIA. The evaluation team will include
technical and professional staff with relevant experience and expertise
in tribal transportation safety issues. The evaluation team will be
responsible for evaluating and rating all eligible projects. The
evaluation team will review each application against the evaluation
criteria in each of the four categories and assign a rating of ``Highly
Qualified,'' ``Qualified,'' or ``Not Qualified'' to each application
for the FHWA Administrator's review. The FHWA Administrator will
forward funding recommendations to the Office of the Secretary. The
final funding decisions will be made by the Secretary of
Transportation.
All applications will be evaluated and assigned a rating of
``Highly Qualified,'' ``Qualified,'' or ``Not Qualified.'' The ratings,
as defined below, are proposed within each priority funding category as
follows:
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The development of a tribal safety plan is the cornerstone
for all future tribal safety activities including education,
enforcement and emergency services, engineering improvements and
other safety planning activities. Because of the importance of
developing, completing or updating a tribal safety plan and for this
one category only, applications will be deemed either ``highly
qualified'' or ``not qualified.'' All applications to develop a new
tribal safety plan, update an incomplete safety plan, or update an
existing tribal safety plan more than 3 years old are deemed to be
highly qualified. Applications not directed to developing, updating
or completing existing a tribal safety plan or which address a plan
not older than 3 years are deemed ``Not Qualified.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Development of Tribal Safety Plans
a. Highly Qualified: Requests (up to a maximum of $12,500) for
development of new tribal safety plans or to update incomplete tribal
safety plans; and requests (up to a maximum of $7,500) to update
existing tribal safety plans that are more than 3 years old.
b. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; any request to update an existing tribal safety plan that
is less than 3 years old.
II. Other Safety Planning Activities
a. Highly Qualified: Requests for other safety planning activities
that are in a current State SHSP or tribal safety plan that is not more
than 5 years old; submission of data that demonstrates the need for the
activities; significant leveraging of private or public funding; and
are part of a comprehensive approach to safety which includes other
safety efforts. If the total amount of funding requested for
applications rated as ``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount of
available funding, FHWA will give priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component must meet eligibility criteria and
must be a transportation safety project that has independent utility
(i.e., is usable and a reasonable expenditure of Federal funds even if
no other improvements are made in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready for its intended use upon
completion of that component.
Applicants should be aware that while it is anticipated that most
of these projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not
lead to construction or have potentially significant traffic or other
impacts, depending on the relationship between the overall project and
the independent component, the NEPA review for the independent
component may have to include evaluation of all project components as
connected, similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR
1508.25. Priority consideration will also be given to funding requests
that include a commitment of other funding sources to complement the
TTPSF, and those requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity
to successfully implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Requests for other safety planning activities that
are in a current State SHSP or tribal safety plan that is more than 5
years old; submission of some data that demonstrates the need for the
activity; some leveraging of private or public funding; and is part of
a comprehensive approach to safety which includes other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety project
that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
review for the independent component may have to include evaluation of
all project components as connected, similar, or cumulative actions, as
detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will also be given
to funding requests that include a commitment of other funding sources
to complement the TTPSF, and those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully implement the proposed project
in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; projects that are not included in a State SHSP or tribal
safety plan.
ii. Engineering Improvements
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or
tribal safety plan that is less than 5 years old; data included in the
application that directly supports the project; project is in a current
road safety audit, impact assessment, or other safety engineering
study; projects located on a BIA or tribal facility; significant
leverage with other funding; the tribe has not received funding for a
TTPSF transportation safety construction project in more than 10 years
or the project is part of a comprehensive approach to safety which
includes three or more other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount
[[Page 36890]]
of available funding, FHWA will give priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component must meet eligibility criteria and
must be a transportation improvement that has independent utility
(i.e., is usable and a reasonable expenditure of Federal funds even if
no other improvements are made in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready for its intended use upon
completion of that component's construction. Applicants should be aware
that, depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or tribal
safety plan, but the plan is more than 5 years old; some data included
in the application that supports the project; project is in a road
safety audit, impact assessment, or other safety engineering study that
is more than 5 years old; project is located on a transportation
facility not owned by a tribe or BIA; some leveraging with other
funding; the tribe has not received funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project in the last 2 to 10 years or the projects
is part of a coordinated approach with one to two other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation improvement that
has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable expenditure
of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in the area).
In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a project,
instead of the full project described in the application, only if that
component provides transportation benefits and will be ready for its
intended use upon completion of that component's construction.
Applicants should be aware that, depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent component, the NEPA review for
the independent component may have to include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at
40 CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will also be given to funding
requests that include a commitment of other funding sources to
complement the TTPSF, and those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully implement the proposed project
in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; are not included in a State SHSP or tribal safety plan;
no data provided in the application to support the request; are not
included in a road safety audit, impact assessment, or other safety
engineering study; have received funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project within the last 2 years or do not have a
comprehensive approach to safety with other partners.
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or
tribal safety plan that is less than 5 years old; data included in the
application that directly supports the requested project; significant
leverage with other funding or are part of a comprehensive approach to
safety, including three or more other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will
give priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety
project that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or tribal
safety plan but the plan is more than 5 years old; some data included
in the application that supports the project; some leveraging with
other funding or are coordinated with one to two other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety project
that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; are not included in a State SHSP or tribal safety plan;
no data provided in the application that supports the project;
[[Page 36891]]
does not have a comprehensive approach to safety with other partners.
iv. Education Programs
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or
tribal safety plan that is less than 5 years old; data included in the
application that directly supports the requested project; significant
leverage with other funding or are part of a comprehensive approach to
safety including three or more other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will
give priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety
project that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or tribal
safety plan but the plan is more than 5 years old; some data included
in the application that supports the project; some leveraging with
other funding or are coordinated with one to two other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety project
that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; are not included in a State SHSP or tribal safety plan;
no data provided in the application that supports the project does not
have a comprehensive approach to safety with other partners.
F. Federal Award Administration Information
1. Federal Award Notice
The FHWA will announce the awarded projects by posting a list of
selected projects at https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/.
Following the announcement, successful applicants and unsuccessful
applicants will be notified separately.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
All awards will be administered pursuant to the Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards found in 2 CFR part 200. Applicable Federal laws,
rules, and regulations set forth in title 23, U.S.C., and title 23 of
the CFR, apply.
The TTPSF will be administered the same way as all TTP funds: FHWA
Agreement tribes will receive funds in accordance with their Program
Agreement through a RFA; BIA Agreement tribes will receive their funds
through their BIA Regional Office; and Compact tribes will receive
their funds through the Department of the Interior's Office of Self
Governance.
3. Reporting
Required reporting follows the requirements for regular TTP funds.
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
For further information concerning this notice please contact
Russell Garcia, TTPSF Program Manager, via email at
russell.garcia@dot.gov; by telephone at 202-366-9815; or by mail at
Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. For legal questions, please
contact Ms. Vivian Philbin, Office of the Chief Counsel, by telephone
at (720) 963-3445; by email at vivian.philbin@dot.gov; or by mail at
Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division,
12300 West Dakota Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80228. Office hours are from
7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. m.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business Information
All information submitted as part of or in support of any
application shall use publicly available data or data that can be made
public and methodologies that are accepted by industry practice and
standards, to the extent possible. If the application includes
information you consider to be a trade secret or confidential
commercial or financial information, the applicant should do the
following: (1) Note on the front cover that the submission ``Contains
Confidential Business Information (CBI)''; (2) mark each affected page
``CBI,'' and (3) highlight or otherwise denote the CBI portions.
Authority: Section 1119 of Pub. L. 112-141; 23 U.S.C. 202(e).
Issued on: June 19, 2015.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-15709 Filed 6-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P