Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the NuStar Burgos Pipelines Projects, 36579-36580 [2015-15676]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 122 / Thursday, June 25, 2015 / Notices
Program Requirements is to require
member retailers to (1) receive and
maintain products that meet ASTM
standards; (2) utilize specific procedures
for blending and distributing biodiesel;
and (3) conform to best practices for
quality assurance and corrective action.
The Program Requirements require
retailers to comply with specific
documentation requirements; engage in
an internal quality management
procedure that includes internal audits,
quality assurance meetings, and
performance reports; comply with best
practices for managing internal and
external laboratories; comply with
specific purchase options when
receiving biodiesel blends and other
guidelines applicable to the receipt of
biodiesel products; engage in sampling
and testing to verify the quality of the
blend; and develop remedial practices
to prevent and correct nonconforming
products. The Policy Regulations
requires retailers to undergo a specific
certification process; comply with
surveillance audit requirements during
recertification; and abide by the
Commission’s decision-making
procedure and guidelines for
shutdowns.
On August 27, 2004, NBAC filed its
original notification pursuant to section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on October 4, 2004 (69 FR 59269).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on April 14, 2011. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on May 11, 2011 (76 FR 27351).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–15563 Filed 6–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice:
Cancellation
The Legal Services
Corporation’s Finance Committee
meeting scheduled for June 29, 2015 at
2:00 p.m. EDT has been canceled. The
meeting was noticed in the Wednesday,
June 17, 2015 issue of the Federal
Register, 80 FR 34703.
CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:
Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to
the Vice President & General Counsel, at
(202) 295–1500. Questions may be sent
by electronic mail to FR_NOTICE_
QUESTIONS@lsc.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATE AND TIME:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jun 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: June 23, 2015.
Katherine Ward,
Executive Assistant to the Vice President for
Legal Affairs and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–15801 Filed 6–23–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 9174]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the
NuStar Burgos Pipelines Projects
Department of State.
Notice; solicitation of
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of State
(the Department) is issuing this Notice
of Intent (NOI) to inform the public that
it intends to prepare an environmental
assessment (EA) consistent with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (as implemented by the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations found at 40 CFR parts
1500–1508) to evaluate the potential
impacts of the construction and
operation of a proposed new NuStar
Burgos pipeline and a proposed change
in petroleum products for an existing
Burgos pipeline. In December 2014,
NuStar submitted two applications to
the Department. One application
requests a new Presidential Permit
allowing changes to the operation of an
existing 8-inch outer diameter pipeline
(the Existing Burgos pipeline) at the
United States-Mexico border, as well as
a name change of the owner and
operator. The other application requests
a new Presidential Permit for
construction, connection, operation, and
maintenance of a new 10-inch outer
diameter pipeline and associated
facilities parallel to the Existing Burgos
pipeline also at the United StatesMexico border (the New Burgos
pipeline). Both pipelines would connect
the Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX)
Burgos Gas Plant near Reynosa,
Tamaulipas, Mexico and the NuStar
terminal near Edinburg, Texas. This NOI
informs the public about the proposed
projects and solicits participation and
comments from interested federal,
tribal, state, and local government
entities and the public for consideration
in establishing the scope and content of
the environmental review.
Project Description:
SUMMARY:
Proposed Changes to the Existing
Burgos Pipeline
NuStar has applied for a new
Presidential Permit to replace a 2006
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36579
Presidential Permit, that would: (1)
Reflect NuStar’s name change from
Valero Logistics Operations, L.P. to
NuStar Logistics, L.P. as the owner and
operator of the Existing Burgos pipeline
and (2) allow the Existing Burgos
pipeline border facilities to transport a
broader range of petroleum products
than allowed by the 2006 Presidential
Permit, including liquefied petroleum
gas and natural gas liquids. The 2006
Presidential Permit only allows
transportation of light naphtha.
The U.S. portion of the Existing
Burgos pipeline is approximately 34
miles long, running between a location
˜
on the Rio Grande southeast of Penitas,
Texas and the NuStar terminal
approximately 6 miles north of
downtown Edinburg, Texas. The
pipeline crosses under the Rio Grande.
The border segment of the pipeline
extends from the center line of the Rio
Grande approximately 8,450 feet (1.6
miles) to the first mainline shut-off
valve in the United States. The Mexican
portion of the Existing Burgos pipeline
runs approximately 12.5 miles between
the Rio Grande crossing and the PEMEX
Burgos Gas Plant. Maximum throughput
based on the design of the pipe is 64,000
barrels per day (bpd).
Proposed New Burgos Pipeline
NuStar has also applied for a new
Presidential Permit to construct,
connect, operate, and maintain a new
pipeline and associated facilities at the
U.S.-Mexico border for the
transportation of a broad range of
petroleum products, including liquefied
petroleum gas and natural gas liquids.
NuStar proposes to construct the New
Burgos pipeline parallel to the Existing
Burgos pipeline and, to the extent
possible, in the same right-of-way. The
border segment subject to a Presidential
Permit, if granted, would extend from
the center line of the Rio Grande
approximately 8,450 feet (1.6 miles) to
the first mainline shut-off valve planned
for construction in the United States.
Maximum throughput based on the
design of the pipe would be 108,000
bpd.
Project Location: The U.S. portion of
the proposed projects is located in
Hidalgo County, Texas.
Environmental Effects: The
environmental review will describe the
environmental impacts of the proposed
actions; any adverse environmental
impacts that cannot be avoided should
the proposals be implemented; the
reasonable alternatives to the proposed
actions; comparison between short-term
and long-term impacts on the
environment; any irreversible and
irretrievable commitments of natural,
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
36580
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 122 / Thursday, June 25, 2015 / Notices
physical or other resources that would
occur if the proposed actions are
implemented, and any proposed
mitigation measures if needed. The
analysis will focus on air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources,
geology and soils, greenhouse gas
emissions, hazards and hazardous
materials, potential accidents and spills,
hydrology and water quality, noise,
socioeconomics, environmental justice,
transportation and any other topics that
arise during scoping.
While the President has delegated
authority to the Department to issue
permits for pipeline facilities at the U.S.
border, the environmental review will
analyze impacts of the proposed
projects in the United States that are
dependent upon Permit issuance.
Scoping Period: The Department
invites the public, governmental
agencies, tribal governments and all
other interested parties to comment on
the scope of the EA. All such comments
should be provided in writing, within
thirty (30) days of the publication of this
notice, at the address listed below. The
comment period for the NOI begins on
June 25, 2015 and ends on July 27, 2015.
Solicitation of Comments: All
comments in response to the NOI must
be submitted by July 27, 2015.
Comments may be submitted at
www.regulations.gov by entering the
title of this Notice into the search field
and following the prompts. Comments
may also be submitted by U.S. mail and
should be addressed to: NuStar Burgos
Project Manager, U.S. Department of
State, 2201 C Street NW., Room 2726,
Washington, DC 20520. All comments
from agencies or organizations should
indicate a contact person for the agency
or organization.
All comments received during the
scoping period may be made public, no
matter how initially submitted.
Comments are not private and will not
be edited to remove identifying or
contact information. Commenters are
cautioned against including any
information that they would not want
publicly disclosed. Any party soliciting
or aggregating comments from other
persons is further requested to direct
those persons not to include any
identifying or contact information, or
information they would not want
publicly disclosed, in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
NuStar Burgos Presidential Permit
applications that provide project details
are available at the following Web site:
https://www.state.gov/e/enr/applicant/
applicants/c66757.htm. Information on
the Presidential Permit process is
available on the following Web site:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jun 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
https://www.state.gov/e/enr/applicant/
applicants/. Please refer to this Web site
or contact the Department at the address
listed in the Solicitation of Comments
section of this notice.
Dated: June 19, 2015.
Deborah Klepp,
Director, Office of Environmental Quality and
Transboundary Issues, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015–15676 Filed 6–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 9175]
2015 Fiscal Transparency Report
Department of State.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State (‘‘the
Department’’) hereby presents the
findings from the FY 2015 fiscal
transparency review process in its Fiscal
Transparency Report. This report
describes the minimum requirements of
fiscal transparency developed, updated,
and strengthened by the Department in
consultation with other relevant federal
agencies, reviews those governments
that were identified as anticipated
recipients of foreign assistance funds in
the FY 2014 Fiscal Transparency
Report, assesses those that did not meet
the minimum fiscal transparency
requirements, and indicates whether
governments that did not meet the
minimum fiscal transparency
requirements made significant progress
towards meeting the requirements
during the review period of January 17–
December 31, 2014. The report also
provides a brief description of the use
of the Fiscal Transparency Innovation
Fund.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Ellis, Financial Economist,
202–647–9497.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
report is submitted pursuant to section
7031(b)(3) of the Department of State,
Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs Appropriations Act, 2015
(Div. J, Pub. L. 113–235) (‘‘the Act’’).
SUMMARY:
Fiscal Transparency
For the purpose of this report, the
minimum requirements of fiscal
transparency include having budget
documents that are publicly available,
substantially complete, and generally
reliable. The review includes an
assessment of the transparency of
processes for awarding government
contracts and licenses for natural
resource extraction. Fiscal transparency
is a critical element of effective public
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
financial management, helps in building
market confidence, and underpins
economic sustainability. Fiscal
transparency fosters greater government
accountability by providing a window
into government budgets for citizens,
helping them to hold their leadership
accountable, and facilitating betterinformed public debates. The
Department’s fiscal transparency review
process assesses whether governments
meet minimum requirements of fiscal
transparency.
Annual reviews of the fiscal
transparency of governments that
receive U.S. assistance helps ensure
U.S. taxpayer money is used
appropriately and provides
opportunities to dialogue with
governments on the importance of fiscal
transparency.
Section 7031(b) of the Act requires the
Secretary to develop, update, and
strengthen minimum requirements of
fiscal transparency for each government
receiving assistance appropriated by the
Act, as identified in the FY 2014 Fiscal
Transparency Report, in consultation
with other relevant federal agencies, and
to make or update any determination of
‘‘significant’’ or ‘‘no significant
progress’’ in meeting the minimum
requirements of fiscal transparency for
each government that did not meet the
minimum requirements. Through
authority delegated from the Secretary,
the Deputy Secretary of State for
Management and Resources made those
determinations for FY 2015.
As a result of the Department
updating and strengthening the
minimum requirements of fiscal
transparency, more governments fell
short of these requirements than in the
FY 2014 assessments, despite in some
cases maintaining or even improving
their level of fiscal transparency. The
report includes a description as to how
those governments fell short of the
minimum requirements, outlines any
significant progress being made toward
meeting the minimum requirements,
and provides specific recommendations
of steps such governments should take
to improve fiscal transparency. The
report also outlines the process followed
by the Department in completing the
assessments and describes how funds
appropriated by the FY 2015 and earlier
appropriations acts are being used to
support fiscal transparency.
While a lack of fiscal transparency
can be an enabling factor for corruption,
the report does not assess corruption. A
finding that a government ‘‘does not
meet the minimum requirements of
fiscal transparency’’ does not
necessarily mean there is significant
corruption in the government; a finding
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36579-36580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15676]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 9174]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the
NuStar Burgos Pipelines Projects
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation of comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of State (the Department) is issuing this
Notice of Intent (NOI) to inform the public that it intends to prepare
an environmental assessment (EA) consistent with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (as implemented by the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations found at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508)
to evaluate the potential impacts of the construction and operation of
a proposed new NuStar Burgos pipeline and a proposed change in
petroleum products for an existing Burgos pipeline. In December 2014,
NuStar submitted two applications to the Department. One application
requests a new Presidential Permit allowing changes to the operation of
an existing 8-inch outer diameter pipeline (the Existing Burgos
pipeline) at the United States-Mexico border, as well as a name change
of the owner and operator. The other application requests a new
Presidential Permit for construction, connection, operation, and
maintenance of a new 10-inch outer diameter pipeline and associated
facilities parallel to the Existing Burgos pipeline also at the United
States-Mexico border (the New Burgos pipeline). Both pipelines would
connect the Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) Burgos Gas Plant near Reynosa,
Tamaulipas, Mexico and the NuStar terminal near Edinburg, Texas. This
NOI informs the public about the proposed projects and solicits
participation and comments from interested federal, tribal, state, and
local government entities and the public for consideration in
establishing the scope and content of the environmental review.
Project Description:
Proposed Changes to the Existing Burgos Pipeline
NuStar has applied for a new Presidential Permit to replace a 2006
Presidential Permit, that would: (1) Reflect NuStar's name change from
Valero Logistics Operations, L.P. to NuStar Logistics, L.P. as the
owner and operator of the Existing Burgos pipeline and (2) allow the
Existing Burgos pipeline border facilities to transport a broader range
of petroleum products than allowed by the 2006 Presidential Permit,
including liquefied petroleum gas and natural gas liquids. The 2006
Presidential Permit only allows transportation of light naphtha.
The U.S. portion of the Existing Burgos pipeline is approximately
34 miles long, running between a location on the Rio Grande southeast
of Pe[ntilde]itas, Texas and the NuStar terminal approximately 6 miles
north of downtown Edinburg, Texas. The pipeline crosses under the Rio
Grande. The border segment of the pipeline extends from the center line
of the Rio Grande approximately 8,450 feet (1.6 miles) to the first
mainline shut-off valve in the United States. The Mexican portion of
the Existing Burgos pipeline runs approximately 12.5 miles between the
Rio Grande crossing and the PEMEX Burgos Gas Plant. Maximum throughput
based on the design of the pipe is 64,000 barrels per day (bpd).
Proposed New Burgos Pipeline
NuStar has also applied for a new Presidential Permit to construct,
connect, operate, and maintain a new pipeline and associated facilities
at the U.S.-Mexico border for the transportation of a broad range of
petroleum products, including liquefied petroleum gas and natural gas
liquids. NuStar proposes to construct the New Burgos pipeline parallel
to the Existing Burgos pipeline and, to the extent possible, in the
same right-of-way. The border segment subject to a Presidential Permit,
if granted, would extend from the center line of the Rio Grande
approximately 8,450 feet (1.6 miles) to the first mainline shut-off
valve planned for construction in the United States. Maximum throughput
based on the design of the pipe would be 108,000 bpd.
Project Location: The U.S. portion of the proposed projects is
located in Hidalgo County, Texas.
Environmental Effects: The environmental review will describe the
environmental impacts of the proposed actions; any adverse
environmental impacts that cannot be avoided should the proposals be
implemented; the reasonable alternatives to the proposed actions;
comparison between short-term and long-term impacts on the environment;
any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of natural,
[[Page 36580]]
physical or other resources that would occur if the proposed actions
are implemented, and any proposed mitigation measures if needed. The
analysis will focus on air quality, biological resources, cultural
resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and
hazardous materials, potential accidents and spills, hydrology and
water quality, noise, socioeconomics, environmental justice,
transportation and any other topics that arise during scoping.
While the President has delegated authority to the Department to
issue permits for pipeline facilities at the U.S. border, the
environmental review will analyze impacts of the proposed projects in
the United States that are dependent upon Permit issuance.
Scoping Period: The Department invites the public, governmental
agencies, tribal governments and all other interested parties to
comment on the scope of the EA. All such comments should be provided in
writing, within thirty (30) days of the publication of this notice, at
the address listed below. The comment period for the NOI begins on June
25, 2015 and ends on July 27, 2015.
Solicitation of Comments: All comments in response to the NOI must
be submitted by July 27, 2015. Comments may be submitted at
www.regulations.gov by entering the title of this Notice into the
search field and following the prompts. Comments may also be submitted
by U.S. mail and should be addressed to: NuStar Burgos Project Manager,
U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street NW., Room 2726, Washington, DC
20520. All comments from agencies or organizations should indicate a
contact person for the agency or organization.
All comments received during the scoping period may be made public,
no matter how initially submitted. Comments are not private and will
not be edited to remove identifying or contact information. Commenters
are cautioned against including any information that they would not
want publicly disclosed. Any party soliciting or aggregating comments
from other persons is further requested to direct those persons not to
include any identifying or contact information, or information they
would not want publicly disclosed, in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The NuStar Burgos Presidential Permit
applications that provide project details are available at the
following Web site: https://www.state.gov/e/enr/applicant/applicants/c66757.htm. Information on the Presidential Permit process is available
on the following Web site: https://www.state.gov/e/enr/applicant/applicants/. Please refer to this Web site or contact the Department at
the address listed in the Solicitation of Comments section of this
notice.
Dated: June 19, 2015.
Deborah Klepp,
Director, Office of Environmental Quality and Transboundary Issues,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-15676 Filed 6-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P