30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rent Reform Demonstration (Task Order 2), 36353-36354 [2015-15536]

Download as PDF 36353 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 121 / Wednesday, June 24, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5831–N–31] 30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rent Reform Demonstration (Task Order 2) Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: HUD has submitted the proposed information collection requirement described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public comment. DATES: Comments Due Date: July 24, 2015. SUMMARY: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colette Pollard, Reports Management Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Colette Pollard at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone 202–402–3400. This is not a toll-free number. Persons with hearing or speech Information collection Number of respondents impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Pollard. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on April 14, 2015 at 80 FR 20008. A. Overview of Information Collection Title of Information Collection: Rent Reform Demonstration. OMB Approval Number: 2528–0306. Type of Request: Revision of existing collection. Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The Department is conducting this study under contract with MDRC and its subcontractors (Branch Associates, The Bronner Group, Quadel Consulting Corporation, and the Urban Institute). The project is a random assignment trial of an alternative rent system. Families will be randomly assigned to participate either in the new/alternative rent system or to continue in the current system. For voucher holders, outcomes of the alternative system are hypothesized to be increases in earnings, employment and job retention, among others. Random assignment will limit the extent to which selection bias drives observed results. The demonstration Frequency of response Responses per annum Burden hour per response will document the progress of a group of housing voucher holders, who will be drawn from current residents. The intent is to gain an understanding of the impact of the alternative rent system on the families as well as the administrative burden on Public Housing Agencies (PHAs). Four PHAs currently participating in the Moving to Work (MtW) Demonstration are participating in the demonstration: (1) Lexington Housing Authority (LHA), Lexington, Kentucky; (2) Louisville Metro Housing Authority (LMHA), Louisville, Kentucky; (3) San Antonio Housing Authority (SAHA), San Antonio, Texas; and (4) District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA), Washington, DC. Data collection will include the families that are part of the treatment and control groups, as well as PHA staff. Data for this evaluation will be gathered through a variety of methods including informational interviews and discussions, direct observation, and analysis of administrative records. The work covered under this information request is for data collection proposed under the first of two required OMB submissions of the Task Order 2 of the Rent Reform Demonstration. Respondents: 156. This includes: • Public Housing Authority Staff: up to 44 (i.e., assuming up to 11 staff at up to 4 PHAs). • Families with housing vouchers participating in the Rent Reform Demonstration, up to 80. Annual burden hours Hourly cost per response 1 8.13 80 participants (20 participants * 4 sites). Once ................ One .................. 90 minutes, on average (1.5 hours). 120 (80 * 1.5) ... PHA Staff Interviews. 32 staff (8 staff 2 * 4 sites). Once ................ One .................. 3 24.33 4 staff (1 staff * 4 sites). 16 hours (4 staff * 1 hour * 4 responses in 2015). 4 33.58 Cost Study Data Collection Activities with PHA staff. 8 staff (2 staff * 4 sites). 8 responses in Four in 2015, the covered two in 2016, period one in 2017, (monthly one in 2018. through January 2015, then annually through 2018). Three times One .................. over the covered period. 90 minutes, on average (or 1.5 hours). 60 minutes, on average (or 1 hour). 48 hours (32 * 1.50). Housing Authority Database Extraction Activities by PHA staff. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Study Participant Interviews and/or Focus Groups. 120 minutes, on average (or 2 hours). 16 hours (8 staff * 2 hours). 33.58 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:43 Jun 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM 24JNN1 Annual cost $487.80 (40 employed sample members * $8.13 * 1.5 hours). $1,167.84 (32 staff * $24.33 * 1.5 hours). $537.28 (4 staff * $33.58 * 1 hour * 4 responses in 2015). $537.28 (8 staff * $33.58 * 2 hours). 36354 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 121 / Wednesday, June 24, 2015 / Notices Information collection Number of respondents 156 ................... Responses per annum Burden hour per response Annual burden hours Four times ........ Interviews to un- 32 staff (8 staff derstand im* 4 sites). plementation of new rent model. Includes meetings with PHA staff for technical assistance purposes. Total ........... Hourly cost per response Frequency of response Up to four times 30–60 minutes (or .5 to 1 hours) Incorporated into technical assistance, monitoring visits and follow-up. 128 hours (4 one-hour meetings * 32 staff). 24.33 .......................... .......................... .......................... 328 ................... .................... Annual cost $2,983 (32 staff * $24.33 * 1 hour * 4 meetings). $5,844.44. 1 Households participating in the Rent Reform Demonstration will range widely in employment position and earnings. We have estimated the hourly wage at the expected prevailing minimum wage, which is $7.25 per hour in Kentucky and Texas. The hourly minimum wage in the District of Columbia is expected to be $10.50 by Q3 of 2015. (Source: District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, https://does.dc.gov/sites/ default/files/dc/sites/does/page_content/attachments/DC%20Minimum%20Wage%20Increase%20-%20DC%20Register%20Public%20Notice.pdf.) Accordingly, we assume an hourly rate across all sites of $8.13 that represents an average of these two rates, weighted by the pledged sample at each site. (2,000 pledged participants in Washington, DC and 5,400 pledged in the remaining sites.) Moreover, we expect about 50 percent of the participants to be employed at the time of study entry. A recent report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, some 55 percent of non-elderly, non-disabled households receiving voucher assistance reported earned income in 2010. The typical (median) annual earnings for these families were $15,600, only slightly more than the pay from full-time, year-round minimum-wage work. (https://www.cbpp.org/cms/ ?fa=view&id=3634). Based on this, we assumed 50% of tenants would be working at the federal minimum wage. 2 Number of PHA staff interviews could increase if the housing agency deploys more staff to work on activities related to Rent Reform implementation. 3 For program staff participating in interviews, the estimate uses the median hourly wages of selected occupations (classified by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes) was sourced from the Occupational Employment Statistics from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics. Potentially relevant occupations and their median hourly wages are: Occupation SOC code Community and Social Service Specialist ............................................................... Social/community Service Manager ........................................................................ Median hourly wage rate 21–1099 11–9151 $19.26 29.40 4 For program staff supporting data extraction activities, the estimate uses the median hourly wages of selected relevant occupations in a manner similar to the above. A standard wage assumption of $33.58 was created by averaging median hourly wage rates for these occupations: Source: Occupational Employment Statistics, accessed online March 20, 2015 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm. To estimate cost burden to program staff respondents, we use an average of the occupations listed, or $24.33/hr. Occupation SOC code Database Administrator ........................................................................................... Social/community Service Manager ........................................................................ Median hourly wage rate 15–1141 11–9151 $37.75 29.40 Source: Occupational Employment Statistics, accessed online March 22, 2015 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES B. Solicitation of Public Comment This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:43 Jun 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. Dated: June 17, 2015. Colette Pollard, Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–15536 Filed 6–23–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLORW00000.L16100000.DP0000. LXSSH0930000.15XL1109AF.HAG 15–0169] Notice of Public Meeting Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) San Juan Islands National Monument Advisory Committee (MAC) will meet as indicated below. DATES: The MAC will meet on Wednesday, July 8, 2015, from 10:30 a.m.–5:30 p.m. at the Grace Episcopal Church, 70 Sunrise Rd., Lopez, WA 98261. There will be two public comment periods: 10:45–11:15 and 4:45–5:30. This meeting will focus on recreation, visual resource management, special designations such as Areas of Environmental Concern and lands with wilderness characteristics, and trails and travel management. The BLM resource lead will be present to share the breadth of considerations and opportunities in the generation of alternatives for separate areas, or zones and a discussion of public engagement SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM 24JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36353-36354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15536]



[[Page 36353]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5831-N-31]


30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rent Reform 
Demonstration (Task Order 2)

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD has submitted the proposed information collection 
requirement described below to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The 
purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public 
comment.

DATES: Comments Due Date: July 24, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding 
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB 
Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503; fax: 202-395-5806. Email: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colette Pollard, Reports Management 
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Colette Pollard at 
Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone 202-402-3400. This is not a toll-
free number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this 
number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 
(800) 877-8339.
    Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from 
Ms. Pollard.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is 
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in 
Section A.
    The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the 
information collection for a period of 60 days was published on April 
14, 2015 at 80 FR 20008.

A. Overview of Information Collection

    Title of Information Collection: Rent Reform Demonstration.
    OMB Approval Number: 2528-0306.
    Type of Request: Revision of existing collection.
    Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The 
Department is conducting this study under contract with MDRC and its 
subcontractors (Branch Associates, The Bronner Group, Quadel Consulting 
Corporation, and the Urban Institute). The project is a random 
assignment trial of an alternative rent system. Families will be 
randomly assigned to participate either in the new/alternative rent 
system or to continue in the current system. For voucher holders, 
outcomes of the alternative system are hypothesized to be increases in 
earnings, employment and job retention, among others. Random assignment 
will limit the extent to which selection bias drives observed results. 
The demonstration will document the progress of a group of housing 
voucher holders, who will be drawn from current residents. The intent 
is to gain an understanding of the impact of the alternative rent 
system on the families as well as the administrative burden on Public 
Housing Agencies (PHAs). Four PHAs currently participating in the 
Moving to Work (MtW) Demonstration are participating in the 
demonstration:
    (1) Lexington Housing Authority (LHA), Lexington, Kentucky;
    (2) Louisville Metro Housing Authority (LMHA), Louisville, 
Kentucky;
    (3) San Antonio Housing Authority (SAHA), San Antonio, Texas; and
    (4) District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA), Washington, DC.
    Data collection will include the families that are part of the 
treatment and control groups, as well as PHA staff. Data for this 
evaluation will be gathered through a variety of methods including 
informational interviews and discussions, direct observation, and 
analysis of administrative records. The work covered under this 
information request is for data collection proposed under the first of 
two required OMB submissions of the Task Order 2 of the Rent Reform 
Demonstration.
    Respondents: 156.
    This includes:
     Public Housing Authority Staff: up to 44 (i.e., assuming 
up to 11 staff at up to 4 PHAs).
     Families with housing vouchers participating in the Rent 
Reform Demonstration, up to 80.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                           Hourly cost
    Information  collection         Number of        Frequency of      Responses per    Burden hour per    Annual burden       per         Annual cost
                                   respondents         response            annum           response            hours         response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Study Participant Interviews    80 participants    Once............  One.............  90 minutes, on    120 (80 * 1.5)..     \1\ 8.13  $487.80 (40
 and/or Focus Groups.            (20 participants                                       average (1.5                                     employed sample
                                 * 4 sites).                                            hours).                                          members * $8.13
                                                                                                                                         * 1.5 hours).
PHA Staff Interviews..........  32 staff (8 staff  Once............  One.............  90 minutes, on    48 hours (32 *      \3\ 24.33  $1,167.84 (32
                                 \2\ * 4 sites).                                        average (or 1.5   1.50).                         staff * $24.33
                                                                                        hours).                                          * 1.5 hours).
Housing Authority Database      4 staff (1 staff   8 responses in    Four in 2015,     60 minutes, on    16 hours (4         \4\ 33.58  $537.28 (4 staff
 Extraction Activities by PHA    * 4 sites).        the covered       two in 2016,      average (or 1     staff * 1 hour                 * $33.58 * 1
 staff.                                             period (monthly   one in 2017,      hour).            * 4 responses                  hour * 4
                                                    through January   one in 2018.                        in 2015).                      responses in
                                                    2015, then                                                                           2015).
                                                    annually
                                                    through 2018).
Cost Study Data Collection      8 staff (2 staff   Three times over  One.............  120 minutes, on   16 hours (8             33.58  $537.28 (8 staff
 Activities with PHA staff.      * 4 sites).        the covered                         average (or 2     staff * 2                      * $33.58 * 2
                                                    period.                             hours).           hours).                        hours).

[[Page 36354]]

 
Interviews to understand        32 staff (8 staff  Four times......  Up to four times  30-60 minutes     128 hours (4 one-       24.33  $2,983 (32 staff
 implementation of new rent      * 4 sites).                                            (or .5 to 1       hour meetings *                * $24.33 * 1
 model. Includes meetings with                                                          hours)            32 staff).                     hour * 4
 PHA staff for technical                                                                Incorporated                                     meetings).
 assistance purposes.                                                                   into technical
                                                                                        assistance,
                                                                                        monitoring
                                                                                        visits and
                                                                                        follow-up.
                               -------------------                                                      ------------------             -----------------
    Total.....................  156..............  ................  ................  ................  328.............  ...........  $5,844.44.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Households participating in the Rent Reform Demonstration will range widely in employment position and earnings. We have estimated the hourly wage
  at the expected prevailing minimum wage, which is $7.25 per hour in Kentucky and Texas. The hourly minimum wage in the District of Columbia is
  expected to be $10.50 by Q3 of 2015. (Source: District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, https://does.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/does/page_content/attachments/DC%20Minimum%20Wage%20Increase%20-%20DC%20Register%20Public%20Notice.pdf.) Accordingly, we assume an hourly rate across
  all sites of $8.13 that represents an average of these two rates, weighted by the pledged sample at each site. (2,000 pledged participants in
  Washington, DC and 5,400 pledged in the remaining sites.) Moreover, we expect about 50 percent of the participants to be employed at the time of study
  entry. A recent report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, some 55 percent of non-elderly, non-disabled households receiving voucher
  assistance reported earned income in 2010. The typical (median) annual earnings for these families were $15,600, only slightly more than the pay from
  full-time, year-round minimum-wage work. (https://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3634). Based on this, we assumed 50% of tenants would be working at the
  federal minimum wage.
\2\ Number of PHA staff interviews could increase if the housing agency deploys more staff to work on activities related to Rent Reform implementation.
\3\ For program staff participating in interviews, the estimate uses the median hourly wages of selected occupations (classified by Standard
  Occupational Classification (SOC) codes) was sourced from the Occupational Employment Statistics from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor
  Statistics. Potentially relevant occupations and their median hourly wages are:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Occupation                                  SOC code             Median hourly wage rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community and Social Service Specialist...............                      21-1099                       $19.26
Social/community Service Manager......................                      11-9151                        29.40
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For program staff supporting data extraction activities, the estimate uses the median hourly wages of
  selected relevant occupations in a manner similar to the above. A standard wage assumption of $33.58 was
  created by averaging median hourly wage rates for these occupations:
Source: Occupational Employment Statistics, accessed online March 20, 2015 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm. To estimate cost burden to program staff respondents, we use an average of the occupations
  listed, or $24.33/hr.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Occupation                                  SOC code             Median hourly wage rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Database Administrator................................                      15-1141                       $37.75
Social/community Service Manager......................                      11-9151                        29.40
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Occupational Employment Statistics, accessed online March 22, 2015 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm.

B. Solicitation of Public Comment

    This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and 
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in 
Section A on the following:
    (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information;
    (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
    HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to 
these questions.

    Authority:  Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.

    Dated: June 17, 2015.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-15536 Filed 6-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.