Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit, 35951-35952 [2015-15460]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices
natural gas (LNG) pathway and
amendments to various associated
registration, recordkeeping, and
reporting provisions. The final
regulation includes a lifecycle
greenhouse gas emissions analysis for
renewable electricity, renewable diesel
and naphtha produced from landfill
biogas. Adding these new pathways will
enhance the ability of the biofuels
industry to supply advanced biofuels,
including cellulosic biofuels, which
greatly reduce the greenhouse gas
emissions (GHG) compared to the
petroleum-based fuels they replace. It
also addresses ‘‘nameplate capacity’’
issues for certain production facilities
that do not claim exemption from the 20
percent GHG reduction threshold. In the
accompanying final rule for this ICR,
EPA addressed issues related to crop
residue and corn kernel fiber and
finalized an approach to determining
the volume of cellulosic Renewable
Identification Numbers (RIN’s)
produced from various cellulosic
feedstocks. We also included a lifecycle
analysis of advanced butanol and
discussed the potential to allow for
commingling of compliant products at
the retail facility level as long as the
environmental performance of the fuels
would not be detrimental. Several other
amendments to the RFS2 program were
included.
In the final rule, EPA also amended
various changes to the E15 (gasoline
containing up to 15 volume percent
ethanol) mis-fueling mitigation
regulations (MMR) at 40 CFR part 80,
subpart N. Among the E15 changes
finalized were technical corrections and
amendments to sections dealing with
labeling, E15 surveys, product transfer
documents, and prohibited acts.
Technical amendments and corrections
for this regulations had no bearings on
the industry estimates.
Lastly, EPA finalized changes to the
survey requirements associated with the
ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) program.
This change is not addressed here
because there are fewer than nine
respondents.
Form Numbers: 2
RFS1700–RFS2 Renewable Fuel
Producers—Cellulosic Converted
Fraction—5900–362
RFS1300–RFS2 Renewable Fuel
Producers Using Crop Residue as a
Feedstock Report—5900–262
Respondents/affected entities:
Producers of renewable fuels, Producers
of renewable electricity, Importers of
renewable fuels, Feedstock producers
from waste treatment plants, Feedstock
producers from landfills, Parties who
own RINS’s.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Jun 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory.
Estimated number of respondents: 60
(total).
Frequency of response: Quarterly,
annually, on occasion.
Total estimated burden: 8,889 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b).
Total estimated cost: $1,081,415 (per
year), includes $0 annualized capital or
operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in Estimates EPA estimates
yearly 60 respondents and 8,889 burden
hours which will cost industry
$1,081,415. This is a new collection
with no industry cost for comparison.
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Byron Bunker,
Director, Compliance Division, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air
and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2015–15467 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9929–53–OGC]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air
Act Citizen Suit
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent
decree; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby
given of a proposed consent decree to
address a lawsuit filed by the
Environmental Integrity Project:
Environmental Integrity Project v.
McCarthy, No. 1:14-cv-2106 (RC) (D.
D.C.). On December 12, 2014, Plaintiff
filed a complaint alleging that Gina
McCarthy, in her official capacity as
Administrator of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’), failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty to grant or deny
within 60 days two petitions submitted
by the Environmental Integrity Project
on May 19, 2014, requesting that EPA
object to two CAA Title V permits
issued by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (‘‘TCEQ’’) to the
Shell Chemical Company and the Shell
Oil Company authorizing the operation
of the Deer Park Chemical Plant and the
Deer Park Refinery, respectively, located
in Harris County, Texas. The proposed
consent decree would establish a
deadline of August 21, 2015, for EPA to
take such action.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35951
Written comments on the
proposed consent decree must be
received by July 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2015–0364, online at
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method); by email to oei.docket@
epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;
or by hand delivery or courier to EPA
Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and
4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on
a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted
in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of
encryption, and may be mailed to the
mailing address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard H. Vetter, Air and Radiation
Law Office, Office of General Counsel,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
c/o US/EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/IO D205–01,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone: (919) 541–2127; fax
number (919) 541–4991; email address:
vetter.rick@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Consent Decree
The proposed consent decree would
resolve a lawsuit filed by the
Environmental Integrity Project seeking
to compel the Administrator to take
actions under CAA section 505(b)(2).
Under the terms of the proposed
consent decree, EPA would agree to sign
its response granting or denying the
petitions filed by the Environmental
Integrity Project regarding Shell
Chemical Company’s Deer Park
Chemical Plant and Shell Oil
Company’s Deer Park Refinery, both
located in Harris County, Texas,
pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the
CAA, on or before August 21, 2015.
Under the terms of the proposed
consent decree, EPA would
expeditiously deliver notice of EPA’s
response to the Office of the Federal
Register for review and publication
following signature of such response. In
addition, the proposed consent decree
outlines the procedure for the Plaintiffs
to request costs of litigation, including
attorney fees.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, EPA will accept written
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree from persons who are
not named as parties or intervenors to
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
35952
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices
the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
consent decree if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless
EPA or the Department of Justice
determines that consent to this consent
decree should be withdrawn, the terms
of the consent decree will be affirmed.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How can I get a copy of the consent
decree?
The official public docket for this
action (identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OGC–2015–0364) contains a
copy of the proposed consent decree.
The official public docket is available
for public viewing at the Office of
Environmental Information (OEI) Docket
in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search.’’
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Jun 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web
site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–15460 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau; Federal Advisory Committee
Act; Task Force on Optimal Public
Safety Answering Point Architecture
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), this notice advises interested
persons that the Federal
Communications Commission’s (FCC)
Task Force on Optimal Public Safety
Answering Point (PSAP) Architecture
(Task Force) will hold its third meeting.
DATES: July 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Room TW–C305
(Commission Meeting Room), 445 12th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy May, Federal Communications
Commission, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, 202–418–
1463, email: timothy.may@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting will be held on July 27, 2015,
from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the
Commission Meeting Room of the FCC,
Room TW–305, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The Task Force
is a Federal Advisory Committee that
studies and will report findings and
recommendations on PSAP structure
and architecture to determine whether
additional consolidation of PSAP
infrastructure and architecture
improvements would promote greater
efficiency of operations, safety of life,
and cost containment, while retaining
needed integration with local first
responder dispatch and support. On
December 2, 2014, pursuant to the
FACA, the Commission established the
Task Force charter for a period of two
years, through December 2, 2016. At this
meeting, the Task Force will vote on the
recommendations and report of Working
Group 3, ‘‘Optimal Approach to NextGeneration 911 Resource Allocation for
PSAPs.’’
Members of the general public may
attend the meeting. The FCC will
attempt to accommodate as many
attendees as possible; however,
admittance will be limited to seating
availability. The Commission will
provide audio and/or video coverage of
the meeting over the Internet from the
FCC’s Web page at https://www.fcc.gov/
live.
Open captioning will be provided for
this event. Other reasonable
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35951-35952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15460]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9929-53-OGC]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA'' or the ``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed
consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by the Environmental
Integrity Project: Environmental Integrity Project v. McCarthy, No.
1:14-cv-2106 (RC) (D. D.C.). On December 12, 2014, Plaintiff filed a
complaint alleging that Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as
Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(``EPA''), failed to perform a non-discretionary duty to grant or deny
within 60 days two petitions submitted by the Environmental Integrity
Project on May 19, 2014, requesting that EPA object to two CAA Title V
permits issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(``TCEQ'') to the Shell Chemical Company and the Shell Oil Company
authorizing the operation of the Deer Park Chemical Plant and the Deer
Park Refinery, respectively, located in Harris County, Texas. The
proposed consent decree would establish a deadline of August 21, 2015,
for EPA to take such action.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by July 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2015-0364, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method);
by email to oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard H. Vetter, Air and Radiation
Law Office, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, c/o US/EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/IO D205-01, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone: (919) 541-2127; fax number (919) 541-4991;
email address: vetter.rick@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree
The proposed consent decree would resolve a lawsuit filed by the
Environmental Integrity Project seeking to compel the Administrator to
take actions under CAA section 505(b)(2). Under the terms of the
proposed consent decree, EPA would agree to sign its response granting
or denying the petitions filed by the Environmental Integrity Project
regarding Shell Chemical Company's Deer Park Chemical Plant and Shell
Oil Company's Deer Park Refinery, both located in Harris County, Texas,
pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the CAA, on or before August 21, 2015.
Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, EPA would
expeditiously deliver notice of EPA's response to the Office of the
Federal Register for review and publication following signature of such
response. In addition, the proposed consent decree outlines the
procedure for the Plaintiffs to request costs of litigation, including
attorney fees.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, EPA will accept written comments relating to the
proposed consent decree from persons who are not named as parties or
intervenors to
[[Page 35952]]
the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may
withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree if the
comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such
consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with
the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of Justice
determines that consent to this consent decree should be withdrawn, the
terms of the consent decree will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How can I get a copy of the consent decree?
The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2015-0364) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in
the appropriate docket identification number then select ``search.''
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-15460 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P