Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision on the Final General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Ozark National Scenic Riverway, Missouri, 35972-35973 [2015-15417]
Download as PDF
35972
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices
Information collected
Reason for collection
Declaration whether this proposed donation is or is not part of a series
of donations to the Department.
To assist the Department in determining the scope and context of the
donation, and to assist in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To establish the contact information of the potential donor, and have
the certifier sign the certification form.
Signature, Printed Name, Date, Organization, Email address, City,
State, Zip, and daytime or work phone number.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Data
(1) Title: Donor Certification Form.
OMB Control Number: 1090–0009.
Current Expiration Date: September
30, 2015.
Type of Review: Information
Collection Renewal.
Affected Entities: Individuals or
households, Businesses, Not-for-profit
institutions, Tribal governments.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 250.
Frequency of responses: Once per
prospective donation.
(2) Annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden:
Total annual reporting per response:
20 minutes.
Total number of estimated responses:
250.
Total annual reporting: 84 hours.
(3) Description of the need and use of
the information: This information will
provide Department staff with the basis
for beginning the evaluation as to
whether the Department will accept the
proposed donation. The authorized
employee will receive the donor
certification form with the proposed
donation. The employee will then
review the totality of circumstances
surrounding the proposed donation to
determine whether the Department can
accept the donation and maintain its
integrity, impartiality, and public
confidence.
III. Request for Comments
The Departments invite comments on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agencies, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agencies’
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information and the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
‘‘Burden’’ means the total time, effort,
and financial resources expended by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Jun 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
persons to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose, or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions; to
develop, acquire, install, and use
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, and to complete and
review the collection of information;
and to transmit or otherwise disclose
the information.
All written comments, with names
and addresses, will be available for
public inspection. If you wish us to
withhold your personal information,
you must prominently state at the
beginning of your comment what
personal information you want us to
withhold. We will honor your request to
the extent allowable by law. If you wish
to view any comments received, you
may do so by using the contact
information in the ADDRESSES section
above. A valid picture identification is
required for entry into the Department
of the Interior.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
control number.
Douglas A. Glenn,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Director,
Office of Financial Management, Department
of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2015–15350 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–MWR–OZAR–17614;PPMWMWROW2/
PPM00UP05.YP0000]
Notice of Availability of a Record of
Decision on the Final General
Management Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement, Ozark National
Scenic Riverway, Missouri
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final
General Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/
EIS), Ozark National Scenic Riverways
(Riverways), Missouri.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are
available by request by writing to
Superintendent, Ozark National Scenic
Riverways, 404 Watercress Drive, P.O.
Box 490, Van Buren, Missouri 63965.
The document is also available on the
internet at the NPS Planning,
Environment, and Public Comment Web
site at: https://www.park
planning.nps.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Bill Black at the address
above, or by telephone at 573–323–
4236.
SUMMARY:
On
January 22, 2015, the Acting Regional
Director for the Midwest Region signed
the ROD for the Final GMP/EIS, thereby
approving it. As soon as practicable, the
Riverways will begin the
implementation of the selected
alternative B (the preferred alternative)
as described in the final GMP/EIS.
Alternative B will enhance
opportunities for visitors to discover
and learn about the natural wonders and
Ozark heritage of the National
Riverways, while maintaining a mix of
traditional recreational and commercial
activities. Emphasis will be placed on
increasing opportunities for visitor
education and connections to natural
resources and cultural landscapes.
This alternative focuses on providing
a balance of diverse recreational
opportunities and visitor experiences
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices
along with increasing visitor education
and appreciation of natural and cultural
resources of the park unit. This
alternative will provide a
comprehensive Riverways-wide
approach to resource and visitor use
management. Specific management
zones detailing acceptable resource
conditions, visitor experience and use
levels, and appropriate activities and
development will be applied to
Riverways’ lands consistent with this
concept.
A mix of private and guided
traditional recreational activities like
boating, floating, and horseback riding
will occur under this alternative.
Additional trails and a small learning
center at a rehabilitated Powder Mill
will be developed to better orient and
inform visitors. Natural resources will
be restored to more natural conditions,
while maintaining greater opportunities
for visitor access. Most of the Big Spring
Wilderness Study Area will be
recommended for wilderness
designation.
The selected action and three other
alternatives were analyzed in the draft
and final GMP/EIS. The full range of
foreseeable environmental
consequences was assessed. Among the
alternatives the NPS considered, the
selected action best achieves a high
standard of natural and cultural
resource protection with improved
opportunities for visitors in the park.
The NPS selected alternative B as its
preferred alternative following an
evaluation of the effectiveness of each
alternative in meeting the stated
objectives of the general management
plan, and the environmental benefits
and adverse impacts for each
alternative. This alternative provides the
best combination of strategies to protect
the park unit’s unique natural and
cultural resources and visitor
experience, while improving the park
unit’s operational effectiveness and
sustainability. It also provides other
advantages to the Riverways, regional
communities, partners, and
stakeholders.
In addition, selection of the preferred
alternative, as reflected by the analysis
contained in the final GMP/EIS, will not
result in the impairment of park
resources and will allow the National
Park Service to conserve National
Riverways’ resources and provide for
their enjoyment by visitors.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Jun 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: January 22, 2015.
Patricia S. Trap,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region.
Editor’s note: This document was received
for publication by the Office of the Federal
Register on June 18, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–15417 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MA–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–MWR–CUVA–17695; PPMWMWROW2/
PMP00UP05.YP0000]
Notice of Availability of a Record of
Decision for the White-Tailed Deer
Management Plan, Environmental
Impact Statement, Cuyahoga Valley
National Park, Ohio
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Record of Decision (ROD) for the WhiteTailed Deer Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement (plan/
EIS), Cuyahoga Valley National Park
(Park), Ohio.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are
available by request by writing to the
Chief of the Resource Management
Division, Lisa Petit, Cuyahoga Valley
National Park, 15610 Vaughn Road,
Brecksville, Ohio 44141, telephone
(440) 546–5970. The document is also
available on the internet at the NPS
Planning, Environment, and Public
Comment Web site at: https://
www.parkplanning.nps.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief of the Resource Management
Division, Lisa Petit at the address or
telephone number above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have
issued a ROD for the final plan/EIS; on
February 13, 2015, the Acting Regional
Director for the Midwest Region
approved the ROD. The plan/EIS
analyzed four alternatives, including a
no-action alternative. The full range of
foreseeable environmental
consequences was assessed, and
appropriate mitigating measures were
identified.
The NPS decision is to implement
alternative D (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘selected action’’), which was
identified as the NPS preferred
alternative in the final plan/EIS. The
selected action will utilize an adaptive
management strategy. Under the
selected action, the NPS will continue
current park deer management actions
including: Research, monitoring, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35973
data management; protection of
restoration plantings; education and
coordination; and enforcement of the
existing wildlife feeding ban. In
addition, the NPS will incorporate a
combination of lethal and nonlethal
actions to address high deer density.
Lethal actions (including sharpshooting,
with very limited capture/euthanasia if
necessary) will be taken initially to
reduce deer densities quickly. It is
anticipated that in years one through
four, 335 deer will be removed by
sharpshooting (in addition to small
numbers of deer removed by capture
and euthanasia) to meet the deer density
goal. Population maintenance will
follow the initial reduction, and could
be conducted by nonsurgical
reproductive control methods, if an
acceptable agent is available, or by
sharpshooting. Both maintenance
methods are included in the selected
action to maintain maximum flexibility
for future management. All actions will
be carried out by NPS personnel or
authorized agents.
The Record of Decision includes a
summary of the purpose and need for
action, identifies the selected action and
all alternatives considered by the NPS,
a listing of measures to minimize
environmental harm, details about the
monitoring program that will inform
implementation of the selected action,
the basis for the decision, and a
description of the environmentally
preferable alternative.
Dated: February 13, 2015.
Patricia S. Trap,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region.
Editor’s Note: This document was received
for publication by the Office of Federal
Register on June 18, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–15477 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MA–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
Solicitation of Comments Relating to
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled Certain Resealable Packages
with Slider Devices, DN 3072; the
Commission is soliciting comments on
any public interest issues raised by the
complaint or complainant’s filing under
section 210.8(b) of the Commission’s
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35972-35973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15417]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-MWR-OZAR-17614;PPMWMWROW2/PPM00UP05.YP0000]
Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision on the Final
General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Ozark National
Scenic Riverway, Missouri
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final General Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/EIS), Ozark National Scenic
Riverways (Riverways), Missouri.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are available by request by writing to
Superintendent, Ozark National Scenic Riverways, 404 Watercress Drive,
P.O. Box 490, Van Buren, Missouri 63965. The document is also available
on the internet at the NPS Planning, Environment, and Public Comment
Web site at: https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Bill Black at the
address above, or by telephone at 573-323-4236.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 22, 2015, the Acting Regional
Director for the Midwest Region signed the ROD for the Final GMP/EIS,
thereby approving it. As soon as practicable, the Riverways will begin
the implementation of the selected alternative B (the preferred
alternative) as described in the final GMP/EIS. Alternative B will
enhance opportunities for visitors to discover and learn about the
natural wonders and Ozark heritage of the National Riverways, while
maintaining a mix of traditional recreational and commercial
activities. Emphasis will be placed on increasing opportunities for
visitor education and connections to natural resources and cultural
landscapes.
This alternative focuses on providing a balance of diverse
recreational opportunities and visitor experiences
[[Page 35973]]
along with increasing visitor education and appreciation of natural and
cultural resources of the park unit. This alternative will provide a
comprehensive Riverways-wide approach to resource and visitor use
management. Specific management zones detailing acceptable resource
conditions, visitor experience and use levels, and appropriate
activities and development will be applied to Riverways' lands
consistent with this concept.
A mix of private and guided traditional recreational activities
like boating, floating, and horseback riding will occur under this
alternative. Additional trails and a small learning center at a
rehabilitated Powder Mill will be developed to better orient and inform
visitors. Natural resources will be restored to more natural
conditions, while maintaining greater opportunities for visitor access.
Most of the Big Spring Wilderness Study Area will be recommended for
wilderness designation.
The selected action and three other alternatives were analyzed in
the draft and final GMP/EIS. The full range of foreseeable
environmental consequences was assessed. Among the alternatives the NPS
considered, the selected action best achieves a high standard of
natural and cultural resource protection with improved opportunities
for visitors in the park. The NPS selected alternative B as its
preferred alternative following an evaluation of the effectiveness of
each alternative in meeting the stated objectives of the general
management plan, and the environmental benefits and adverse impacts for
each alternative. This alternative provides the best combination of
strategies to protect the park unit's unique natural and cultural
resources and visitor experience, while improving the park unit's
operational effectiveness and sustainability. It also provides other
advantages to the Riverways, regional communities, partners, and
stakeholders.
In addition, selection of the preferred alternative, as reflected
by the analysis contained in the final GMP/EIS, will not result in the
impairment of park resources and will allow the National Park Service
to conserve National Riverways' resources and provide for their
enjoyment by visitors.
Dated: January 22, 2015.
Patricia S. Trap,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region.
Editor's note: This document was received for publication by the
Office of the Federal Register on June 18, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015-15417 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MA-P