Periodic Reporting, 35898-35899 [2015-15361]
Download as PDF
35898
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE TO § 100.100—Continued
• Date: A one day event either on a Saturday or Sunday between September 15 and October 15.
• Time (Approximate): 7:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
• Location: All navigable waters of the Connecticut River off South Glastonbury, CT Beginning at position
41°41′18.88″N; 072°37′16.26″ W., then downriver along the west bank to a point at position
41°38′49.12″ N.; 072°37′32.73″ W., then across the Connecticut River to a point at position 41°38′49.5″
N.; 072°37′19.55″ W., then upriver along the east bank to a point at position 41°41′25.82″ N.;
072°37′9.08″ W., then across the Connecticut River to the point of origin (NAD 83).
• Additional Stipulations: Non-event vessels transiting through the area during the enforcement period are
to travel at no wake speeds or 6 knots, whichever is slower and that non-event vessels shall not block
or impede the transit of event participants, event safety vessels or official patrol vessels in the regulated
area unless authorized by COTP or designated representatives.
10
October
10.1 Head of the Riverfront Rowing Regatta, Hartford, CT.
• Event type: Regatta.
• Date: The first Sunday of October, from 8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.
• Location: All water of the Connecticut River, Hartford, CT, between at point North of Wethersfield Cove
at 41°43′52.17″ N.; 072°38′40.38″ W. and the Riverside Boat House 41°46′30.98″ N.; 072° 39′54.35″ W.
(NAD 83).
II. Summary of Proposal
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
Dated: June 8, 2015.
E. J. Cubanski, III,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Long Island Sound.
I. Introduction
[FR Doc. 2015–15406 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2015–9; Order No. 2545]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing requesting
that the Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to analytical principles relating
to periodic reports (Proposal One). This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: July 23,
2015. Reply comments are due: August
3, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Jun 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
On June 12, 2015, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate an informal rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to
analytical principles relating to periodic
reports.1 Text attached to the Petition
identifies the proposed analytical
method changes filed in this docket as
Proposal One, Proposed Change in RPW
Methodology for Forever Stamp Usage,
Stamp Breakage, and PIHOP. Id.
Attachment at 1. The Postal Service
concurrently filed a non-public library
reference, along with an application for
nonpublic treatment.2
II. Summary of Proposal
The Petition requests a change in
methodology for the treatment of
revenue, pieces, and weight (RPW)
associated with forever stamp usage,
breakage, and Postage-in-the-Hands-ofthe-Public (PIHOP). Stamp breakage
refers to the forever stamps that have
been sold by the Postal Service but will
never be used due to factors such as lost
or damaged stamps and collectables. Id.
at 3. PIHOP refers to forever stamps that
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service
Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a
Proposed Change in Analytical Principles (Proposal
One), June 12, 2015 (Petition).
2 Notice of Filing of USPS–RM2015–9/NP1 and
Application for Nonpublic Treatment, June 12, 2015
(Notice). The library reference is USPS–RM2015–9/
NP1, Non-Public Material Relating to Proposal One.
The Notice incorporates by reference the
Application for Non-Public Treatment of Materials
contained in Attachment Two to the December 29,
2014, United States Postal Service Fiscal Year 2014
Annual Compliance Report. Notice at 1. See 39 CFR
part 3007 for information on access to non-public
material.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
are being held by purchasers for future
use. Id.
The Postal Service currently estimates
forever stamp breakage by assigning
stamps a category and an issue year,
known as a layer. Id. at 3–4. When a
layer of stamps is no longer available for
sale and is determined to be at the end
of its life cycle, as measured by the
Origin Destination Information System
(ODIS)-RPW system, the difference
between cumulative sales and
cumulative usage (calculated as a
percentage) is deemed to be breakage
and recognized as revenue for the Postal
Service. Id. at 4. This breakage
percentage is applied to forever stamp
sales for that layer and all remaining
open forever stamp layers, until the
remaining layers expire and become the
new basis for estimating the breakage
percentage. Id.
Forever stamp usage is collected by
ODIS–RPW data collectors and
expanded to national totals. Id. A
separate process calculates the value of
the layer used, based on the different
prices at which it was originally sold.
Id. at 5. The estimated forever stamp
usage is included in the current Book
Revenue Adjustment Factor (BRAF)
calculation. Id. at 7. The Postal Service
currently estimates PIHOP liability at
the end of each accounting period. Id.
at 5. PIHOP liability is calculated by
subtracting the stamp breakage and
stamp usage from stamp sales. Id.
The proposed changes include using
the ODIS–RPW estimates for forever
stamps usage directly in the RPW
Report. Id. at 9. Under the proposal, two
changes would occur in the BRAF
formulation: Forever stamp usage would
be removed from the ODIS–RPW SinglePiece Sampling Revenue and forever
stamp usage and forever stamp and nonforever stamp breakage would be
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Proposed Rules
removed from the residual total balance.
Id. at 10. In addition, breakage from
both forever and non-forever stamps
would be assigned to Market Dominant
Other Revenue in the RPW Report and
PIHOP revenues, including meter
PIHOP, will no longer be allocated
directly to products. Id. at 11.
RPW reporting impacts. The Postal
Service provides three tables that assess
the impact of its proposal. Id. Table 1
shows the BRAF calculations for FY
2014 for current and proposed
methodologies; Table 2 shows the FY
2014 RPW report for the current
proposed methodologies; and Table 3
shows the same information for Quarter
2 Year-to-Date FY 2015. Id. at 11–12.
Library Reference USPS–FY2015–9/NP1
contains non-public versions of Tables 2
and 3. Id. at 12.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2015–9 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition.
Additional information concerning the
Petition may be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.prc.gov. Interested persons may
submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal One no later than July 23,
2015. Reply comments are due no later
than August 3, 2015. Pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 505, Anne C. O’Connor is
designated as officer of the Commission
(Public Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2015–9 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service Requesting
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a
Proposed Change in Analytical
Principles (Proposal One), filed June 12,
2015.
2. Comments are due no later than
July 23, 2015. Reply comments are due
no later than August 3, 2015.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Anne C.
O’Connor to serve as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–15361 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Jun 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 34
[Docket No. CDC–2015–0045]
RIN 0920–AA28
Medical Examination of Aliens—
Revisions to Medical Screening
Process
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), within
the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), is issuing this
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend its regulations governing
medical examinations that aliens must
undergo before they may be admitted to
the United States. Specifically, HHS/
CDC proposes to: revise the definition of
communicable disease of public health
significance by removing chancroid,
granuloma inguinale, and
lymphogranuloma venereum as
inadmissible health-related conditions
for aliens seeking admission to the
United States; update the notification of
the health-related grounds of
inadmissibility to include proof of
vaccinations to align with existing
requirements established by the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA);
revise the definitions and evaluation
criteria for mental disorders, drug abuse
and drug addiction; clarify and revise
the evaluation requirements for
tuberculosis; clarify and revise the
process for the HHS/CDC-appointed
medical review board that convenes to
reexamine the determination of a Class
A medical condition based on an
appeal; and update the titles and
designations of federal agencies within
the text of the regulation.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 0920–AA28 or the Docket
Number CDC–2015–0045 in the heading
of this document by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Division of Global Migration
and Quarantine, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road, NE., MS E–03, Atlanta, GA 30333,
ATTN: Part 34.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Division of
Global Migration and Quarantine,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35899
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS
E–03, Atlanta, GA 30333, ATTN: Part
34.
• Viewing Comments: Comments may
be viewed at www.regulations.gov,
Docket Number CDC–2015–0045.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking. All relevant comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received or to download an
electronic version of the NPRM, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and refer to
Docket Number CDC–2015–0045.
Comments will be available for public
inspection from Monday through
Friday, except for legal holidays, from 9
a.m. until 5 p.m., Eastern Time, at 1600
Clifton Road NE., Atlanta, Georgia
30333. Please call ahead to 1–866–694–
4867, and ask for a representative in the
Division of Global Migration and
Quarantine to schedule your visit.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley A. Marrone, J.D., Division of
Global Migration and Quarantine,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS
E–03, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; telephone
1–404–498–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Preamble to this NPRM is organized as
follows:
I. Public Participation
II. Legal Authority
III. Background
A. Inadmissibility and the Medical
Examination
B. Applicability of part 34
C. Legislative and Regulatory History
IV. Rationale for Proposed Regulatory Action
A. Section 34.2 Definitions
B. Section 34.3 Scope of Examinations
C. Section 34.4 Medical Notifications
D. Section 34.7 Medical and Other Care;
Death
E. Section 34.8 Reexamination; Convening
of Review Boards; Expert Witnesses,
Reports
V. Alternatives Considered
VI. Required Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. The Paperwork Reduction Act
D. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
E. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. The Plain Language Act of 2010
VII. References
I. Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35898-35899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15361]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2015-9; Order No. 2545]
Periodic Reporting
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing
requesting that the Commission initiate an informal rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to
periodic reports (Proposal One). This notice informs the public of the
filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: July 23, 2015. Reply comments are due: August
3, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of Proposal
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On June 12, 2015, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant to
39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles
relating to periodic reports.\1\ Text attached to the Petition
identifies the proposed analytical method changes filed in this docket
as Proposal One, Proposed Change in RPW Methodology for Forever Stamp
Usage, Stamp Breakage, and PIHOP. Id. Attachment at 1. The Postal
Service concurrently filed a non-public library reference, along with
an application for nonpublic treatment.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service Requesting
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a Proposed Change in
Analytical Principles (Proposal One), June 12, 2015 (Petition).
\2\ Notice of Filing of USPS-RM2015-9/NP1 and Application for
Nonpublic Treatment, June 12, 2015 (Notice). The library reference
is USPS-RM2015-9/NP1, Non-Public Material Relating to Proposal One.
The Notice incorporates by reference the Application for Non-Public
Treatment of Materials contained in Attachment Two to the December
29, 2014, United States Postal Service Fiscal Year 2014 Annual
Compliance Report. Notice at 1. See 39 CFR part 3007 for information
on access to non-public material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of Proposal
The Petition requests a change in methodology for the treatment of
revenue, pieces, and weight (RPW) associated with forever stamp usage,
breakage, and Postage-in-the-Hands-of-the-Public (PIHOP). Stamp
breakage refers to the forever stamps that have been sold by the Postal
Service but will never be used due to factors such as lost or damaged
stamps and collectables. Id. at 3. PIHOP refers to forever stamps that
are being held by purchasers for future use. Id.
The Postal Service currently estimates forever stamp breakage by
assigning stamps a category and an issue year, known as a layer. Id. at
3-4. When a layer of stamps is no longer available for sale and is
determined to be at the end of its life cycle, as measured by the
Origin Destination Information System (ODIS)-RPW system, the difference
between cumulative sales and cumulative usage (calculated as a
percentage) is deemed to be breakage and recognized as revenue for the
Postal Service. Id. at 4. This breakage percentage is applied to
forever stamp sales for that layer and all remaining open forever stamp
layers, until the remaining layers expire and become the new basis for
estimating the breakage percentage. Id.
Forever stamp usage is collected by ODIS-RPW data collectors and
expanded to national totals. Id. A separate process calculates the
value of the layer used, based on the different prices at which it was
originally sold. Id. at 5. The estimated forever stamp usage is
included in the current Book Revenue Adjustment Factor (BRAF)
calculation. Id. at 7. The Postal Service currently estimates PIHOP
liability at the end of each accounting period. Id. at 5. PIHOP
liability is calculated by subtracting the stamp breakage and stamp
usage from stamp sales. Id.
The proposed changes include using the ODIS-RPW estimates for
forever stamps usage directly in the RPW Report. Id. at 9. Under the
proposal, two changes would occur in the BRAF formulation: Forever
stamp usage would be removed from the ODIS-RPW Single-Piece Sampling
Revenue and forever stamp usage and forever stamp and non-forever stamp
breakage would be
[[Page 35899]]
removed from the residual total balance. Id. at 10. In addition,
breakage from both forever and non-forever stamps would be assigned to
Market Dominant Other Revenue in the RPW Report and PIHOP revenues,
including meter PIHOP, will no longer be allocated directly to
products. Id. at 11.
RPW reporting impacts. The Postal Service provides three tables
that assess the impact of its proposal. Id. Table 1 shows the BRAF
calculations for FY 2014 for current and proposed methodologies; Table
2 shows the FY 2014 RPW report for the current proposed methodologies;
and Table 3 shows the same information for Quarter 2 Year-to-Date FY
2015. Id. at 11-12. Library Reference USPS-FY2015-9/NP1 contains non-
public versions of Tables 2 and 3. Id. at 12.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2015-9 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition. Additional information concerning the
Petition may be accessed via the Commission's Web site at https://www.prc.gov. Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal One no later than July 23, 2015. Reply comments are due no
later than August 3, 2015. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Anne C. O'Connor
is designated as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2015-9 for consideration
of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal
Service Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider a Proposed
Change in Analytical Principles (Proposal One), filed June 12, 2015.
2. Comments are due no later than July 23, 2015. Reply comments are
due no later than August 3, 2015.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Anne C.
O'Connor to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in
this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15361 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P