Changes or Corrections to Mail Classification Schedule, 35573-35575 [2015-15198]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Changes or Corrections to Mail
Classification Schedule
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is amending
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–0358 to read as
follows:
■
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket No. RM2015–6; Order No. 2543]
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is issuing a
set of final rules addressing changes and
corrections to the Mail Classification
Schedule (MCS). The final rules
establish procedures for material
changes in services offered in
connection with products and
corrections to product descriptions.
Relative to the proposed rules, all
changes are minor and non-substantive.
DATES: Effective July 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory History
(a) Safety Zones. The following area is
a designated safety zone:
(1) Location. All waters along the
Columbia River, Cathlamet, WA, within
a 500 foot radius at the approximate
position of 46°12′14″ N; 123°23′17″ W.
(2) Enforcement Period. This event
will be held on July 18, 2015 from 10:00
p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in this
section or bring, cause to be brought, or
allow to remain in the safety zone
created in this section any vehicle,
vessel, or object unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative. The Captain of the Port
may be assisted by other Federal, State,
or local agencies with the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or Designated Representative by
contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the
Coast Guard Sector Columbia River
Command Center via telephone at (503)
861–6211.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T13–0358 Safety Zone; Cathlamet
Bald Eagle Days Firework Display,
Cathlamet, WA.
Table of Contents
Dated: May 19, 2015.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2015–15323 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Jun 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
72 FR 63662, November 9, 2007
79 FR 69781, November 24, 2014
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Summary of Comments Received and
Explanation of Revisions
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In this Order, the Commission adopts
final rules regarding requests to change
or correct the Mail Classification
Schedule (MCS).
II. Background
The Commission is charged with
maintaining accurate product lists. See
39 U.S.C. 3642. In Docket No. RM2007–
1, the Commission promulgated rules
establishing the MCS as the vehicle for
presenting the product lists with
necessary descriptive content.1 Those
rules are codified at 39 CFR part 3020,
subparts A–F.
On November 14, 2014, the
Commission issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking and requested comments on
proposed rules regarding requests to
change or correct the MCS (specifically,
replacing 39 CFR part 3020, subpart E).2
Order No. 2250 described how the
regulations did not satisfactorily address
1 Docket
No. RM2007–1, Order No. 26, Order
Proposing Regulations to Establish a System of
Ratemaking, August 15, 2007, at 85.
2 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Changes and
Corrections to the Mail Classification Schedule,
November 14, 2014 (Order No. 2250).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35573
MCS changes that were more significant
than minor corrections to the MCS but
did not rise to the level of a product list
modification. The proposed rules
distinguished between material changes
and minor corrections to the descriptive
content in the MCS and proposed
procedures for the initiation and review
of each type of change. The notice of
proposed rulemaking was also
published in the Federal Register. 79 FR
69781 (November 24, 2014).
The Postal Service and the Public
Representative submitted initial
comments suggesting changes to the
rules proposed in Order No. 2250.3 The
Postal Service also submitted reply
comments.4 After consideration of the
comments submitted, the Commission
adopts the proposed rules, modified as
described below.
III. Section-by-Section Analysis
In general, the Postal Service and
Public Representative offered positive
comments with respect to the
Commission’s proposed rules. See, e.g.,
Postal Service Comments at 1, PR
Comments at 3. Both commenters also
offered suggestions that they assert
would improve or clarify the proposed
rules. The comments primarily focused
on two issues: The contents of the
supporting justification for a material
change to a MCS product description
and the provisions concerning the
Commission’s review of requests to
make either a material change or minor
correction to the MCS. The
Commission’s analysis of the comments
received is discussed below.
A. Section 3020.81 (Supporting
Justification for Changes to Product
Descriptions)
Section 3020.81 of the proposed rules
lists the supporting justification that
must be filed by the Postal Service when
it proposes a material change to a
product description in the MCS. As
proposed, paragraph (c) required the
Postal Service to describe the impact
that the proposed material changes will
have on users of the product and on
competitors as part of its supporting
justification for its request to make a
material change to a product
description.
The Postal Service comments that the
requirement in proposed section
3020.81(c) is more strenuous than the
requirement that currently applies to
3 Initial Comments of the United States Postal
Service, December 24, 2014 (Postal Service
Comments); Public Representative Comments,
December 24, 2014 (PR Comments).
4 Reply Comments of the United State Postal
Service, January 8, 2015 (Postal Service Reply
Comments).
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
35574
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
modifications of the product lists. Postal
Service Comments at 2. The Postal
Service suggests that section 3020.81(c)
requires only that it ‘‘[p]rovide any
available information that describes the
likely impact of the changes on users of
the product and on competitors.’’ Id. at
3. The Postal Service states its
alternative wording would establish the
same standard that currently applies to
modifications of the product lists. Id.
In contrast, the Public Representative
suggests that paragraph (c) be broadened
to require the Postal Service to
‘‘[d]escribe the views of those who use
the product on the appropriateness of
the proposed action and the impact that
the changes will have on users of the
product and on competitors and on
small business concerns.’’ PR Comments
at 12. He asserts that the Commission’s
proposed rules eliminate two
considerations required by 39 U.S.C.
3642(b)(3) and the reintroduction of
those considerations would protect the
product lists from erosion through
incremental changes to a product
description, which could eventually
modify the product itself, to the
detriment of users. Id. at 11–12.
The Postal Service responds that the
Public Representative’s suggestion
appears to impose an obligation on it
‘‘to obtain certainty’’ regarding the
impact that a material MCS product
description change will have before it
requests Commission review of the
change. Postal Service Reply Comments
at 2–3. The Postal Service hypothesizes
that such a requirement would require
it to ‘‘conduct market research or
otherwise compile data that reflect some
unspecified level of scientific or
empirical analysis of the impact of an
MCS product description change on
customers, competitors and small
businesses.’’ Id. at 3. The Postal Service
suggests the following revision to the
Public Representative’s proposal for
paragraph (c): Provide available
information describing the views of
those who use the product on the
appropriateness of the proposed action
and the likely impact of the changes on
users of the product and on competitors
and on small business concerns. Id.
The Commission declines to adopt the
particular revisions proposed by either
commenter. Although the Public
Representative and Postal Service offer
different suggested language, both
commenters attempt to establish a
standard for material changes to product
descriptions that is similar to the
standard that applies to modifications of
the product lists. See Postal Service
Comments at 3; PR Comments at 11.
However, the Commission’s intent in
establishing the standard for material
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Jun 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
changes was to strike a middle ground
between the showing that is required for
modifications to the product lists and
the showing for corrections to MCS
product descriptions.
Nevertheless, the Commission
recognizes that the paragraph, as
originally proposed, could be
interpreted to require a more
burdensome showing by the Postal
Service than that required for
modifications of the product lists.
Therefore, the Commission adopts the
following minor revision to proposed
section 3020.81(c)—the addition of the
word likely—so that section 3020.81(c)
will read as follows: Describe the likely
impact that the changes will have on
users of the product and on competitors.
This change tracks the Commission’s
original intent to allow the Postal
Service to make a showing that is less
onerous than the showing that is
required for modifications to the
product lists but more robust than the
showing for corrections to MCS product
descriptions.
the Public Representative that the
proposed rule is unclear concerning
when the Commission will make the
change to the MCS. Therefore, the
Commission adopts the Public
Representative’s suggestion and adds
language to state that the change to the
MCS will coincide with the effective
date of the proposed change to both
sections 3020.83 and 3020.92.
Third and finally, the Public
Representative suggests ‘‘in the interests
of clarity and economy’’ combining
sections 3020.83 and 3020.92 into a
section numbered 3020.100 and named
‘‘Commission Review and Action.’’ Id.
at 12. The Postal Service does not
comment on the Public Representative’s
suggestion. The format of the proposed
rules was designed to have separate
sections for material changes (39 CFR
3020.80 et seq.) and minor corrections
(39 CFR 3020.90 et seq.). Accordingly,
the Commission declines to adopt the
Public Representative’s suggestion.
B. Provisions Concerning Commission
Review (3020.83 and 3020.92)
Sections 3020.83 and 3020.92 of the
proposed rules describe the actions the
Commission may take in response to a
Postal Service request to either
materially change or correct a product
description, respectively. These
provisions are nearly identical in the
proposed rules.
The Public Representative suggests
three revisions to proposed section
3020.92. First, he suggests revising
section 3020.92(b) to explicitly state that
a minor correction would be made if
‘‘not a material change to the product
descriptions’’ and ‘‘consistent with the
provisions of title 39, subject to editorial
corrections.’’ PR Comments at 8. The
Postal Service does not object to the
Public Representative’s suggestion but
comments that the second change may
be ‘‘superfluous.’’ Postal Service Reply
Comments at 2. The Public
Representative’s suggested additions are
already implied by the proposed
language. Accordingly, the Commission
declines to adopt the Public
Representative’s suggestions as
unnecessary.
Second, the Public Representative
comments that the elimination of the
statement in the current rule that the
Commission will make the change ‘‘to
coincide with the effective date of the
proposed change’’ introduces
‘‘ambiguity about the Commission’s
intended action time.’’ PR Comments at
8. The Postal Service does not comment
on the Public Representative’s
suggestion. The Commission agrees with
In order to improve upon the clarity
of the rules proposed in Order No. 2250,
the Commission makes the following
editorial changes and minor corrections:
• Rule 3020.81 contains an editorial
change to the title of the rule.
• Rule 3020.82 contains an editorial
change to the title of the rule.
• Rule 3020.83 contains an editorial
change to the title of the rule.
• Rule 3020.83(e) contains a minor
correction.
• Rule 3020.91 contains an editorial
change to the title of the rule.
• Rule 3020.92 contains an editorial
change to the title of the rule.
• Rule 3020.92(e) contains a minor
correction.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Additional Minor Corrections
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. Part 3020 of title 39, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended as set
forth below the signature of this Order,
effective 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
2. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3020
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Commission amends
chapter III of title 39 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
Part 3020—PRODUCT LISTS
1. The authority citation of part 3020
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 503; 3622; 3631;
3642; 3682.
■
§ 3020.82 Docket and notice of material
changes to product descriptions.
2. Revise subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E—Requests Initiated by the Postal
Service To Make Material Changes or Minor
Corrections to the Mail Classification
Schedule
Sec.
3020.80 Material changes to product
descriptions.
3020.81 Supporting justification for
material changes to product descriptions.
3020.82 Docket and notice of material
changes to product descriptions.
3020.83 Commission review of material
changes to product descriptions.
3020.84–3020.89 [Reserved]
3020.90 Minor corrections to product
descriptions.
3020.91 Docket and notice of minor
corrections to product descriptions.
3020.92 Commission review of minor
corrections to product descriptions.
Subpart E—Requests Initiated by the
Postal Service To Make Material
Changes or Minor Corrections to the
Mail Classification Schedule
§ 3020.80 Material changes to product
descriptions.
(a) Whenever the Postal Service
proposes material changes to a product
description in the Mail Classification
Schedule, no later than 30 days prior to
implementing the proposed changes, it
shall submit to the Commission a
request to change the product
description in the Mail Classification
Schedule.
(b) The request shall:
(1) Include a copy of the applicable
sections of the Mail Classification
Schedule and the proposed changes
therein in legislative format; and
(2) Provide all supporting justification
for the changes upon which the Postal
Service proposes to rely.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 3020.81 Supporting justification for
material changes to product descriptions.
(a) Supporting justification for
changes to a product description in the
Mail Classification Schedule shall
include a description of, and rationale
for, the proposed changes to the product
description; and the additional material
in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b)(1) As to market dominant
products, explain why the changes are
not inconsistent with each requirement
of 39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and part 3010 of
this chapter; or
(2) As to competitive products,
explain why the changes will not result
in the violation of any of the standards
of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and part 3015 of this
chapter.
(c) Describe the likely impact that the
changes will have on users of the
product and on competitors.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Jun 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
35575
§ 3020.91 Docket and notice of minor
corrections to product descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall take the
actions identified in paragraphs (b)
through (e) of this section.
(b) Establish a docket for each request
to change a product description in the
Mail Classification Schedule;
(c) Publish notice of the request on its
Web site;
(d) Designate an officer of the
Commission to represent the interests of
the general public in the docket; and
(e) Provide interested persons with an
opportunity to comment on whether the
proposed changes are consistent with
title 39 and applicable Commission
regulations.
(a) The Commission shall take the
actions identified in paragraphs (b)
through (e) of this section.
(b) Establish a docket for each
proposal to correct a product
description in the Mail Classification
Schedule;
(c) Publish notice of the proposal on
its Web site;
(d) Designate an officer of the
Commission to represent the interests of
the general public in the docket; and
(e) Provide interested persons with an
opportunity to comment on whether the
proposed corrections are consistent with
title 39 and applicable Commission
regulations.
§ 3020.83 Commission review of material
changes to product descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall review the
request and any comments filed. The
Commission shall take one of the
actions identified in paragraphs (b)
through (g) of this section.
(b) Approve the proposed changes,
subject to editorial corrections, and
change the Mail Classification Schedule
to coincide with the effective date of the
proposed change;
(c) Reject the proposed changes;
(d) Provide the Postal Service with an
opportunity to amend the proposed
changes;
(e) Direct the Postal Service to make
an appropriate filing under a different
section;
(f) Institute further proceedings; or
(g) Direct other action that the
Commission considers appropriate.
§§ 3020.84–3020.89
[Reserved]
§ 3020.90 Minor corrections to product
descriptions.
(a) The Postal Service shall ensure
that product descriptions in the Mail
Classification Schedule accurately
represent the current offerings of the
Postal Service.
(b) The Postal Service shall submit
minor corrections to product
descriptions in the Mail Classification
Schedule by filing notice with the
Commission no later than 15 days prior
to the effective date of the proposed
corrections.
(c) The notice shall:
(1) Explain why the proposed
corrections do not constitute material
changes to the product description for
purposes of § 3020.80;
(2) Explain why the proposed
corrections are consistent with any
applicable provisions of title 39; and
(3) Include a copy of the applicable
sections of the Mail Classification
Schedule and the proposed corrections
therein in legislative format.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 3020.92 Commission review of minor
corrections to product descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall review the
notice and any comments filed. The
Commission shall take one of the
actions identified in paragraphs (b)
through (g) of this section.
(b) Approve the proposed corrections,
subject to editorial corrections, and
change the Mail Classification Schedule
to coincide with the effective date of the
proposed change;
(c) Reject the proposed corrections;
(d) Provide the Postal Service with an
opportunity to amend the proposed
corrections;
(e) Direct the Postal Service to make
an appropriate filing under a different
section;
(f) Institute further proceedings; or
(g) Direct other action that the
Commission considers appropriate.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–15198 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket No. 11–42; DA 15–398]
Lifeline and Link Up Reform
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
clarifies rules regarding subscriber usage
of Lifeline-supported service established
in the Lifeline Reform Order. The
Bureau clarifies that, pursuant to the
Lifeline Reform Order, an eligible
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35573-35575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15198]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket No. RM2015-6; Order No. 2543]
Changes or Corrections to Mail Classification Schedule
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is issuing a set of final rules addressing
changes and corrections to the Mail Classification Schedule (MCS). The
final rules establish procedures for material changes in services
offered in connection with products and corrections to product
descriptions. Relative to the proposed rules, all changes are minor and
non-substantive.
DATES: Effective July 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
72 FR 63662, November 9, 2007
79 FR 69781, November 24, 2014
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Summary of Comments Received and Explanation of Revisions
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In this Order, the Commission adopts final rules regarding requests
to change or correct the Mail Classification Schedule (MCS).
II. Background
The Commission is charged with maintaining accurate product lists.
See 39 U.S.C. 3642. In Docket No. RM2007-1, the Commission promulgated
rules establishing the MCS as the vehicle for presenting the product
lists with necessary descriptive content.\1\ Those rules are codified
at 39 CFR part 3020, subparts A-F.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Docket No. RM2007-1, Order No. 26, Order Proposing
Regulations to Establish a System of Ratemaking, August 15, 2007, at
85.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 14, 2014, the Commission issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking and requested comments on proposed rules regarding requests
to change or correct the MCS (specifically, replacing 39 CFR part 3020,
subpart E).\2\ Order No. 2250 described how the regulations did not
satisfactorily address MCS changes that were more significant than
minor corrections to the MCS but did not rise to the level of a product
list modification. The proposed rules distinguished between material
changes and minor corrections to the descriptive content in the MCS and
proposed procedures for the initiation and review of each type of
change. The notice of proposed rulemaking was also published in the
Federal Register. 79 FR 69781 (November 24, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Changes and Corrections to
the Mail Classification Schedule, November 14, 2014 (Order No.
2250).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service and the Public Representative submitted initial
comments suggesting changes to the rules proposed in Order No. 2250.\3\
The Postal Service also submitted reply comments.\4\ After
consideration of the comments submitted, the Commission adopts the
proposed rules, modified as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Initial Comments of the United States Postal Service,
December 24, 2014 (Postal Service Comments); Public Representative
Comments, December 24, 2014 (PR Comments).
\4\ Reply Comments of the United State Postal Service, January
8, 2015 (Postal Service Reply Comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Section-by-Section Analysis
In general, the Postal Service and Public Representative offered
positive comments with respect to the Commission's proposed rules. See,
e.g., Postal Service Comments at 1, PR Comments at 3. Both commenters
also offered suggestions that they assert would improve or clarify the
proposed rules. The comments primarily focused on two issues: The
contents of the supporting justification for a material change to a MCS
product description and the provisions concerning the Commission's
review of requests to make either a material change or minor correction
to the MCS. The Commission's analysis of the comments received is
discussed below.
A. Section 3020.81 (Supporting Justification for Changes to Product
Descriptions)
Section 3020.81 of the proposed rules lists the supporting
justification that must be filed by the Postal Service when it proposes
a material change to a product description in the MCS. As proposed,
paragraph (c) required the Postal Service to describe the impact that
the proposed material changes will have on users of the product and on
competitors as part of its supporting justification for its request to
make a material change to a product description.
The Postal Service comments that the requirement in proposed
section 3020.81(c) is more strenuous than the requirement that
currently applies to
[[Page 35574]]
modifications of the product lists. Postal Service Comments at 2. The
Postal Service suggests that section 3020.81(c) requires only that it
``[p]rovide any available information that describes the likely impact
of the changes on users of the product and on competitors.'' Id. at 3.
The Postal Service states its alternative wording would establish the
same standard that currently applies to modifications of the product
lists. Id.
In contrast, the Public Representative suggests that paragraph (c)
be broadened to require the Postal Service to ``[d]escribe the views of
those who use the product on the appropriateness of the proposed action
and the impact that the changes will have on users of the product and
on competitors and on small business concerns.'' PR Comments at 12. He
asserts that the Commission's proposed rules eliminate two
considerations required by 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3) and the reintroduction
of those considerations would protect the product lists from erosion
through incremental changes to a product description, which could
eventually modify the product itself, to the detriment of users. Id. at
11-12.
The Postal Service responds that the Public Representative's
suggestion appears to impose an obligation on it ``to obtain
certainty'' regarding the impact that a material MCS product
description change will have before it requests Commission review of
the change. Postal Service Reply Comments at 2-3. The Postal Service
hypothesizes that such a requirement would require it to ``conduct
market research or otherwise compile data that reflect some unspecified
level of scientific or empirical analysis of the impact of an MCS
product description change on customers, competitors and small
businesses.'' Id. at 3. The Postal Service suggests the following
revision to the Public Representative's proposal for paragraph (c):
Provide available information describing the views of those who use the
product on the appropriateness of the proposed action and the likely
impact of the changes on users of the product and on competitors and on
small business concerns. Id.
The Commission declines to adopt the particular revisions proposed
by either commenter. Although the Public Representative and Postal
Service offer different suggested language, both commenters attempt to
establish a standard for material changes to product descriptions that
is similar to the standard that applies to modifications of the product
lists. See Postal Service Comments at 3; PR Comments at 11. However,
the Commission's intent in establishing the standard for material
changes was to strike a middle ground between the showing that is
required for modifications to the product lists and the showing for
corrections to MCS product descriptions.
Nevertheless, the Commission recognizes that the paragraph, as
originally proposed, could be interpreted to require a more burdensome
showing by the Postal Service than that required for modifications of
the product lists. Therefore, the Commission adopts the following minor
revision to proposed section 3020.81(c)--the addition of the word
likely--so that section 3020.81(c) will read as follows: Describe the
likely impact that the changes will have on users of the product and on
competitors. This change tracks the Commission's original intent to
allow the Postal Service to make a showing that is less onerous than
the showing that is required for modifications to the product lists but
more robust than the showing for corrections to MCS product
descriptions.
B. Provisions Concerning Commission Review (3020.83 and 3020.92)
Sections 3020.83 and 3020.92 of the proposed rules describe the
actions the Commission may take in response to a Postal Service request
to either materially change or correct a product description,
respectively. These provisions are nearly identical in the proposed
rules.
The Public Representative suggests three revisions to proposed
section 3020.92. First, he suggests revising section 3020.92(b) to
explicitly state that a minor correction would be made if ``not a
material change to the product descriptions'' and ``consistent with the
provisions of title 39, subject to editorial corrections.'' PR Comments
at 8. The Postal Service does not object to the Public Representative's
suggestion but comments that the second change may be ``superfluous.''
Postal Service Reply Comments at 2. The Public Representative's
suggested additions are already implied by the proposed language.
Accordingly, the Commission declines to adopt the Public
Representative's suggestions as unnecessary.
Second, the Public Representative comments that the elimination of
the statement in the current rule that the Commission will make the
change ``to coincide with the effective date of the proposed change''
introduces ``ambiguity about the Commission's intended action time.''
PR Comments at 8. The Postal Service does not comment on the Public
Representative's suggestion. The Commission agrees with the Public
Representative that the proposed rule is unclear concerning when the
Commission will make the change to the MCS. Therefore, the Commission
adopts the Public Representative's suggestion and adds language to
state that the change to the MCS will coincide with the effective date
of the proposed change to both sections 3020.83 and 3020.92.
Third and finally, the Public Representative suggests ``in the
interests of clarity and economy'' combining sections 3020.83 and
3020.92 into a section numbered 3020.100 and named ``Commission Review
and Action.'' Id. at 12. The Postal Service does not comment on the
Public Representative's suggestion. The format of the proposed rules
was designed to have separate sections for material changes (39 CFR
3020.80 et seq.) and minor corrections (39 CFR 3020.90 et seq.).
Accordingly, the Commission declines to adopt the Public
Representative's suggestion.
C. Additional Minor Corrections
In order to improve upon the clarity of the rules proposed in Order
No. 2250, the Commission makes the following editorial changes and
minor corrections:
Rule 3020.81 contains an editorial change to the title of
the rule.
Rule 3020.82 contains an editorial change to the title of
the rule.
Rule 3020.83 contains an editorial change to the title of
the rule.
Rule 3020.83(e) contains a minor correction.
Rule 3020.91 contains an editorial change to the title of
the rule.
Rule 3020.92 contains an editorial change to the title of
the rule.
Rule 3020.92(e) contains a minor correction.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. Part 3020 of title 39, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended
as set forth below the signature of this Order, effective 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
2. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3020
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commission amends
chapter III of title 39 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
Part 3020--PRODUCT LISTS
0
1. The authority citation of part 3020 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 35575]]
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 503; 3622; 3631; 3642; 3682.
0
2. Revise subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E--Requests Initiated by the Postal Service To Make Material
Changes or Minor Corrections to the Mail Classification Schedule
Sec.
3020.80 Material changes to product descriptions.
3020.81 Supporting justification for material changes to product
descriptions.
3020.82 Docket and notice of material changes to product
descriptions.
3020.83 Commission review of material changes to product
descriptions.
3020.84-3020.89 [Reserved]
3020.90 Minor corrections to product descriptions.
3020.91 Docket and notice of minor corrections to product
descriptions.
3020.92 Commission review of minor corrections to product
descriptions.
Subpart E--Requests Initiated by the Postal Service To Make
Material Changes or Minor Corrections to the Mail Classification
Schedule
Sec. 3020.80 Material changes to product descriptions.
(a) Whenever the Postal Service proposes material changes to a
product description in the Mail Classification Schedule, no later than
30 days prior to implementing the proposed changes, it shall submit to
the Commission a request to change the product description in the Mail
Classification Schedule.
(b) The request shall:
(1) Include a copy of the applicable sections of the Mail
Classification Schedule and the proposed changes therein in legislative
format; and
(2) Provide all supporting justification for the changes upon which
the Postal Service proposes to rely.
Sec. 3020.81 Supporting justification for material changes to product
descriptions.
(a) Supporting justification for changes to a product description
in the Mail Classification Schedule shall include a description of, and
rationale for, the proposed changes to the product description; and the
additional material in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b)(1) As to market dominant products, explain why the changes are
not inconsistent with each requirement of 39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and part
3010 of this chapter; or
(2) As to competitive products, explain why the changes will not
result in the violation of any of the standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and
part 3015 of this chapter.
(c) Describe the likely impact that the changes will have on users
of the product and on competitors.
Sec. 3020.82 Docket and notice of material changes to product
descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall take the actions identified in paragraphs
(b) through (e) of this section.
(b) Establish a docket for each request to change a product
description in the Mail Classification Schedule;
(c) Publish notice of the request on its Web site;
(d) Designate an officer of the Commission to represent the
interests of the general public in the docket; and
(e) Provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment on
whether the proposed changes are consistent with title 39 and
applicable Commission regulations.
Sec. 3020.83 Commission review of material changes to product
descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall review the request and any comments filed.
The Commission shall take one of the actions identified in paragraphs
(b) through (g) of this section.
(b) Approve the proposed changes, subject to editorial corrections,
and change the Mail Classification Schedule to coincide with the
effective date of the proposed change;
(c) Reject the proposed changes;
(d) Provide the Postal Service with an opportunity to amend the
proposed changes;
(e) Direct the Postal Service to make an appropriate filing under a
different section;
(f) Institute further proceedings; or
(g) Direct other action that the Commission considers appropriate.
Sec. Sec. 3020.84-3020.89 [Reserved]
Sec. 3020.90 Minor corrections to product descriptions.
(a) The Postal Service shall ensure that product descriptions in
the Mail Classification Schedule accurately represent the current
offerings of the Postal Service.
(b) The Postal Service shall submit minor corrections to product
descriptions in the Mail Classification Schedule by filing notice with
the Commission no later than 15 days prior to the effective date of the
proposed corrections.
(c) The notice shall:
(1) Explain why the proposed corrections do not constitute material
changes to the product description for purposes of Sec. 3020.80;
(2) Explain why the proposed corrections are consistent with any
applicable provisions of title 39; and
(3) Include a copy of the applicable sections of the Mail
Classification Schedule and the proposed corrections therein in
legislative format.
Sec. 3020.91 Docket and notice of minor corrections to product
descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall take the actions identified in paragraphs
(b) through (e) of this section.
(b) Establish a docket for each proposal to correct a product
description in the Mail Classification Schedule;
(c) Publish notice of the proposal on its Web site;
(d) Designate an officer of the Commission to represent the
interests of the general public in the docket; and
(e) Provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment on
whether the proposed corrections are consistent with title 39 and
applicable Commission regulations.
Sec. 3020.92 Commission review of minor corrections to product
descriptions.
(a) The Commission shall review the notice and any comments filed.
The Commission shall take one of the actions identified in paragraphs
(b) through (g) of this section.
(b) Approve the proposed corrections, subject to editorial
corrections, and change the Mail Classification Schedule to coincide
with the effective date of the proposed change;
(c) Reject the proposed corrections;
(d) Provide the Postal Service with an opportunity to amend the
proposed corrections;
(e) Direct the Postal Service to make an appropriate filing under a
different section;
(f) Institute further proceedings; or
(g) Direct other action that the Commission considers appropriate.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15198 Filed 6-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P