Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Rules, General Requirements and Test Methods; Utah, 35295-35297 [2015-15158]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 118 / Friday, June 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Statutory Authority
The statutory authority for this action
is provided by section 110 of the CAA,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 1, 2015.
Mark Hague,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2015–14336 Filed 6–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0085; FRL–9929–35–
Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plan Revisions; Rules,
General Requirements and Test
Methods; Utah
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of Utah
on January 28, 2010, September 16,
2010, June 18, 2013, and August 29,
2014. These submittals revise the rules,
general requirements and test methods
for the State of Utah. The amendments
also update the version of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) incorporated
by reference into the rules of the State
of Utah. EPA is not taking action on an
April 26, 2012 submittal or a November
4, 2013 submittal because they have
been superseded by the August 29, 2014
submittal. EPA is taking this action in
accordance with section 110 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2015–0085, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: ostendorf.jody@epa.gov
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jun 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Mail: Director, Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2015–
0085. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA, without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to section I,
General Information, of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35295
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody
Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. 303–312–7814,
ostendorf.jody@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Analysis of the State Submittals
III. What Action is EPA Taking Today?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
I. General Information
What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
1. Submitting Confidential Business
Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to
EPA through https://www.regulations.gov
or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be
CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark
the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically
within the disk or CD–ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register volume, date, and page
number);
• Follow directions and organize your
comments;
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
• Suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes;
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
35296
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 118 / Friday, June 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used;
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced;
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives;
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats; and,
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Analysis of the State Submittals
In this proposed rulemaking, we are
proposing to approve four submittals
into Utah’s SIP. The January 28, 2010
submittal revises R307–405–2, Permits:
Major Sources in Attainment or
Unclassified Areas (PSD) and R307–102,
General Requirements: Broadly
Applicable Requirements. The submittal
revises R307–405–2, which incorporates
by reference the federal Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD)
permitting program in 40 CFR 52.21.
Changes include the exclusion of
ethanol production facilities from the
definition of chemical process plants,
and the clarification in the record
keeping requirements for a modification
where there is a ‘‘reasonable possibility’’
that the change would result in a
significant increase of any regulated
New Source Review (NSR) pollutant.
The ethanol exclusion Final Rule was
issued by EPA (72 FR 24060, May 1,
2007). EPA approved Utah’s revised
rules to implement the non-vacated
provisions of EPA’s NSR Reform
regulations (76 FR 41712, July 15, 2011).
EPA proposes to approve this part of the
submittal.
The January 28, 2010 SIP revision also
updates the incorporation by reference
date of the 40 CFR to July 1, 2008. EPA
is not taking action on this proposed
update because it was superseded by the
August 29, 2014 submittal that we are
acting on in this document.
EPA also proposes to approve R307–
102, General Requirements: Broadly
Applicable Requirements, which
changes the authorization from Title 63–
46b–4 to Title 63G–4–202, due to the
recodification of Title 63 made by
House Bill 63 Chapter 328, Laws of Utah
2008.
The January 28, 2010 submittal
revised R307–101–2, Definitions, to
update the threshold limit values to the
2009 American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists
publication of Threshold Limit Values
for Chemical Substances and Physical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jun 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Agents & Biological Exposure Indices.
However, a March 19, 2014 letter from
the Governor withdrew the January 28,
2010 submittal of R307–101–2. No
further action is required on this
submittal.
The September 16, 2010 submittal
revises R307–101–2, to add the
definition of PM2.5, and General
Requirements: Definitions. The existing
R307–101–2 was approved by EPA on
September 2, 2008 (73 FR 51222).The
definition of ‘‘PM2.5,’’ consistent with
the definition at 40 CFR 50.7, means
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal
2.5 micrometers as measured by an EPA
reference or equivalent method. We
propose to approve this definition of
PM2.5.
The September 16, 2010 submittal
also updates R307–214, National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants to add 12 new federal
Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) standards that may
apply to sources of hazardous air
pollutants in Utah. The amendments to
R307–101–3 and R307–214 update the
version of the Code of Federal
Regulations incorporated by reference
into the rules of the State of Utah.
However, a March 19, 2014 letter from
the Governor withdrew the request to
approve the September 16, 2010
submittal regarding R307–214, National
Emission Standards For Hazardous Air
Pollutants, which is the Utah Air
Quality rule that incorporates by
reference provisions of 40 CFR parts 61
and 63. There is no requirement for
parts 61 and 63 to be incorporated into
Utah’s SIP, so no further action is
required on that part of the submittal.
EPA is not taking action on the
proposed update to the version of the
Code of Federal Regulations for R307–
101–3, because it was superseded by the
August 29, 2014 submittal that EPA is
proposing to approve in this document.
The June 18, 2013 submittal revises
R307–401–15, Air Strippers and Soil
Venting Projects, to refer to the most
recent test methods and to allow sources
to use future updated federallyapproved methods. The existing rule
was (conditionally) approved by EPA
(79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014), after EPA
received a commitment letter from the
State of Utah to remove the Director’s
Discretion language within one year or
EPA’s action would revert to a
disapproval. The State submitted
proposed revised language within the
one-year deadline and requested that
EPA approve the following language in
R307–401–15(3)(a), ‘‘Emissions
estimates of volatile organic compounds
shall be based on test data obtained in
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accordance with the test method in the
EPA document SW–846, Test #8260c or
8261a, or the most recent EPA revision
of either test method if approved by the
director.’’ Utah also proposes to revise
R307–401–15(3)(b), to now state,
‘‘Emissions estimates of hazardous air
pollutants shall be based on test data
obtained in accordance with the test
method in EPA document SW–846, Test
#8021B or the most recent EPA revision
of the test method if approved by the
director.’’ This language provides the
certainty required to ensure the
appropriate EPA approved test is used
and, because EPA routinely updates test
methods, this language allows the State
to use the most current version of the
test method without having to do a SIP
revision. We propose to approve these
revisions.
The June 18, 2013 submittal also
proposes a non-substantive change to renumber R307–410–5(1)[(d)] to R307–
410–5(1)(c)(i)(C). EPA is not acting on
this proposed change because EPA
disapproved R307–410–5,
Documentation of Ambient Air Impacts
for Hazardous Air Pollutants on
February 6, 2014 due to lack of EPA
authority to approve provisions that
only address hazardous air pollutants in
a SIP revision under CAA section 110
(79 FR 7072).
The April 26, 2012 submittal revises
R307–101–3, General Requirements;
Version of Code of Federal Regulations
Incorporated by Reference. EPA is not
taking action on this submittal because
it was superseded by the August 29,
2014 submittal that EPA is acting on in
this document.
The November 4, 2013 submittal also
revises R307–101–3, General
Requirements; Version of Code of
Federal Regulations Incorporated by
Reference. EPA is not taking action on
this submittal because it was
superseded by the August 29, 2014
submittal that EPA is acting on in this
document.
The August 29, 2014 submittal
amends R307–101–3, General
Requirements, Version of Code of
Federal Regulations Incorporated by
Reference and supersedes and replaces
all previous versions of submittals
received on January 28, 2010,
September16, 2010, April 26, 2012 and
November 4, 2013. No further EPA
action is required on those earlier
submittals. The existing rule was
approved by EPA on September 2, 2008
(73 FR 51222). Except as specifically
identified in an individual rule, the
version of the CFR incorporated
throughout R307 is dated July 1, 2013.
The August 29, 2014 submittal
amends R307–101–3 to include four
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 118 / Friday, June 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
chemical compounds on the list of
compounds excluded from the
definition of VOC, as found in EPA rule
at 40 CFR 51.100(s), on the basis that
each of these compounds makes a
negligible contribution to tropospheric
ozone formation. These compounds
consist of four hydrofluoropolyethers
(HFPEs) which are identified as
HCF2OCF2H (also known as HFE–134),
HCF2OCF2OCF2H (also known as HFE–
236cal2), HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (also
known as HFE–338pcc13), and
HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (also
known as H-Galden 1040X or H-Galden
ZT 130 (or 150 or 180)). If an entity uses
or produces any of these four HFPE
compounds (these being in the family of
products known by the trade name HGalden) and is subject to the EPA
regulations limiting the use of VOC in
a product, limiting the VOC emissions
from a facility, or otherwise controlling
the use of VOC for purposes related to
attaining the ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS), then the
compound will not be counted as a VOC
in determining whether these regulatory
obligations have been met.
This EPA rule, Air Quality: Revision
to Definition of Volatile Organic
Compounds—Exclusion of a Group of
Four Hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs),
was finalized on February 12, 2013 (78
FR 9823). EPA proposes to approve this
SIP revision.
Finally, the August 29, 2014 submittal
updates the version of the CFR
incorporated by reference into the rules
of the State of Utah to reflect that 40
CFR 60.56c(d)(2) of subpart Ec was
removed from federal regulation (78 FR
28052). That provision previously
excluded Hospital Medical Infectious
Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) units from
having to comply with standards during
periods of Startup Shutdown
Malfunction (SSM) provided that no
hospital waste or medical/infectious
waste was being charged to the unit
during those SSM periods. That
provision was removed from federal
regulation on May 13, 2013 (78 FR
28052). EPA proposes to approve this
SIP revision.
III. What action is EPA taking today?
EPA is proposing to approve the SIP
revisions submitted by Utah on January
28, 2010, September 16, 2010, June 18,
2013 and August 29, 2014. We are
proposing to approve the January 28,
2010 revisions to R307–405–2, with
exception to the proposed change to the
incorporation by reference date, and
proposing to approve all of the revisions
to R307–102. We are proposing to
approve the June 18, 2013 SIP revisions,
with the exception of the non-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jun 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
substantive change to re-number R307–
410–5(1)[(d)] to R307–410–5(1)(c)(i)(C).
The August 29, 2014 submittal’s newly
amended rule supersedes and replaces
all previous versions of submittals of
R307–101–3, General Requirements,
Version of Code of Federal Regulations
Incorporated by Reference. EPA
proposes to approve the August 29,
2014 revisions. Previous submittals
were received on January 28, 2010,
September 16, 2010, April 26, 2012 and
November 4, 2013. No further EPA
action is required on these earlier
submittals.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the Utah Division of Air Quality rules
regarding rules, general requirements,
and test methods discussed in section II,
Analysis of the State Submittals, of this
preamble. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and/or in
hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state actions, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves some state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact in a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35297
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 3, 2015.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2015–15158 Filed 6–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Chapter I
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0818; FRL–9929–16]
Proposal To Mitigate Exposure to Bees
From Acutely Toxic Pesticide
Products; Extension of Comment
Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35295-35297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15158]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2015-0085; FRL-9929-35-Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions;
Rules, General Requirements and Test Methods; Utah
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Utah on January 28, 2010, September 16, 2010, June 18, 2013,
and August 29, 2014. These submittals revise the rules, general
requirements and test methods for the State of Utah. The amendments
also update the version of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
incorporated by reference into the rules of the State of Utah. EPA is
not taking action on an April 26, 2012 submittal or a November 4, 2013
submittal because they have been superseded by the August 29, 2014
submittal. EPA is taking this action in accordance with section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2015-0085, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: ostendorf.jody@epa.gov
Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129.
Hand Delivery: Director, Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are only accepted
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal
holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-
2015-0085. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA, without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to section I, General
Information, of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy
of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. 303-312-7814,
ostendorf.jody@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Analysis of the State Submittals
III. What Action is EPA Taking Today?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
I. General Information
What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting Confidential Business Information (CBI). Do not
submit CBI to EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For
CBI information on a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically
within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as
CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register volume,
date, and page number);
Follow directions and organize your comments;
Explain why you agree or disagree;
Suggest alternatives and substitute language for your
requested changes;
[[Page 35296]]
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used;
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced;
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives;
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats; and,
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Analysis of the State Submittals
In this proposed rulemaking, we are proposing to approve four
submittals into Utah's SIP. The January 28, 2010 submittal revises
R307-405-2, Permits: Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas
(PSD) and R307-102, General Requirements: Broadly Applicable
Requirements. The submittal revises R307-405-2, which incorporates by
reference the federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
permitting program in 40 CFR 52.21. Changes include the exclusion of
ethanol production facilities from the definition of chemical process
plants, and the clarification in the record keeping requirements for a
modification where there is a ``reasonable possibility'' that the
change would result in a significant increase of any regulated New
Source Review (NSR) pollutant. The ethanol exclusion Final Rule was
issued by EPA (72 FR 24060, May 1, 2007). EPA approved Utah's revised
rules to implement the non-vacated provisions of EPA's NSR Reform
regulations (76 FR 41712, July 15, 2011). EPA proposes to approve this
part of the submittal.
The January 28, 2010 SIP revision also updates the incorporation by
reference date of the 40 CFR to July 1, 2008. EPA is not taking action
on this proposed update because it was superseded by the August 29,
2014 submittal that we are acting on in this document.
EPA also proposes to approve R307-102, General Requirements:
Broadly Applicable Requirements, which changes the authorization from
Title 63-46b-4 to Title 63G-4-202, due to the recodification of Title
63 made by House Bill 63 Chapter 328, Laws of Utah 2008.
The January 28, 2010 submittal revised R307-101-2, Definitions, to
update the threshold limit values to the 2009 American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists publication of Threshold Limit
Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological
Exposure Indices. However, a March 19, 2014 letter from the Governor
withdrew the January 28, 2010 submittal of R307-101-2. No further
action is required on this submittal.
The September 16, 2010 submittal revises R307-101-2, to add the
definition of PM2.5, and General Requirements: Definitions.
The existing R307-101-2 was approved by EPA on September 2, 2008 (73 FR
51222).The definition of ``PM2.5,'' consistent with the
definition at 40 CFR 50.7, means particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers as measured by
an EPA reference or equivalent method. We propose to approve this
definition of PM2.5.
The September 16, 2010 submittal also updates R307-214, National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants to add 12 new federal
Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards that may apply
to sources of hazardous air pollutants in Utah. The amendments to R307-
101-3 and R307-214 update the version of the Code of Federal
Regulations incorporated by reference into the rules of the State of
Utah.
However, a March 19, 2014 letter from the Governor withdrew the
request to approve the September 16, 2010 submittal regarding R307-214,
National Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, which is the
Utah Air Quality rule that incorporates by reference provisions of 40
CFR parts 61 and 63. There is no requirement for parts 61 and 63 to be
incorporated into Utah's SIP, so no further action is required on that
part of the submittal. EPA is not taking action on the proposed update
to the version of the Code of Federal Regulations for R307-101-3,
because it was superseded by the August 29, 2014 submittal that EPA is
proposing to approve in this document.
The June 18, 2013 submittal revises R307-401-15, Air Strippers and
Soil Venting Projects, to refer to the most recent test methods and to
allow sources to use future updated federally-approved methods. The
existing rule was (conditionally) approved by EPA (79 FR 27190, May 13,
2014), after EPA received a commitment letter from the State of Utah to
remove the Director's Discretion language within one year or EPA's
action would revert to a disapproval. The State submitted proposed
revised language within the one-year deadline and requested that EPA
approve the following language in R307-401-15(3)(a), ``Emissions
estimates of volatile organic compounds shall be based on test data
obtained in accordance with the test method in the EPA document SW-846,
Test #8260c or 8261a, or the most recent EPA revision of either test
method if approved by the director.'' Utah also proposes to revise
R307-401-15(3)(b), to now state, ``Emissions estimates of hazardous air
pollutants shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with the
test method in EPA document SW-846, Test #8021B or the most recent EPA
revision of the test method if approved by the director.'' This
language provides the certainty required to ensure the appropriate EPA
approved test is used and, because EPA routinely updates test methods,
this language allows the State to use the most current version of the
test method without having to do a SIP revision. We propose to approve
these revisions.
The June 18, 2013 submittal also proposes a non-substantive change
to re-number R307-410-5(1)[(d)] to R307-410-5(1)(c)(i)(C). EPA is not
acting on this proposed change because EPA disapproved R307-410-5,
Documentation of Ambient Air Impacts for Hazardous Air Pollutants on
February 6, 2014 due to lack of EPA authority to approve provisions
that only address hazardous air pollutants in a SIP revision under CAA
section 110 (79 FR 7072).
The April 26, 2012 submittal revises R307-101-3, General
Requirements; Version of Code of Federal Regulations Incorporated by
Reference. EPA is not taking action on this submittal because it was
superseded by the August 29, 2014 submittal that EPA is acting on in
this document.
The November 4, 2013 submittal also revises R307-101-3, General
Requirements; Version of Code of Federal Regulations Incorporated by
Reference. EPA is not taking action on this submittal because it was
superseded by the August 29, 2014 submittal that EPA is acting on in
this document.
The August 29, 2014 submittal amends R307-101-3, General
Requirements, Version of Code of Federal Regulations Incorporated by
Reference and supersedes and replaces all previous versions of
submittals received on January 28, 2010, September16, 2010, April 26,
2012 and November 4, 2013. No further EPA action is required on those
earlier submittals. The existing rule was approved by EPA on September
2, 2008 (73 FR 51222). Except as specifically identified in an
individual rule, the version of the CFR incorporated throughout R307 is
dated July 1, 2013.
The August 29, 2014 submittal amends R307-101-3 to include four
[[Page 35297]]
chemical compounds on the list of compounds excluded from the
definition of VOC, as found in EPA rule at 40 CFR 51.100(s), on the
basis that each of these compounds makes a negligible contribution to
tropospheric ozone formation. These compounds consist of four
hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs) which are identified as HCF2OCF2H (also
known as HFE-134), HCF2OCF2OCF2H (also known as HFE-236cal2),
HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (also known as HFE-338pcc13), and HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H
(also known as H-Galden 1040X or H-Galden ZT 130 (or 150 or 180)). If
an entity uses or produces any of these four HFPE compounds (these
being in the family of products known by the trade name H-Galden) and
is subject to the EPA regulations limiting the use of VOC in a product,
limiting the VOC emissions from a facility, or otherwise controlling
the use of VOC for purposes related to attaining the ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), then the compound will not be
counted as a VOC in determining whether these regulatory obligations
have been met.
This EPA rule, Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile
Organic Compounds--Exclusion of a Group of Four Hydrofluoropolyethers
(HFPEs), was finalized on February 12, 2013 (78 FR 9823). EPA proposes
to approve this SIP revision.
Finally, the August 29, 2014 submittal updates the version of the
CFR incorporated by reference into the rules of the State of Utah to
reflect that 40 CFR 60.56c(d)(2) of subpart Ec was removed from federal
regulation (78 FR 28052). That provision previously excluded Hospital
Medical Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) units from having to
comply with standards during periods of Startup Shutdown Malfunction
(SSM) provided that no hospital waste or medical/infectious waste was
being charged to the unit during those SSM periods. That provision was
removed from federal regulation on May 13, 2013 (78 FR 28052). EPA
proposes to approve this SIP revision.
III. What action is EPA taking today?
EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revisions submitted by Utah on
January 28, 2010, September 16, 2010, June 18, 2013 and August 29,
2014. We are proposing to approve the January 28, 2010 revisions to
R307-405-2, with exception to the proposed change to the incorporation
by reference date, and proposing to approve all of the revisions to
R307-102. We are proposing to approve the June 18, 2013 SIP revisions,
with the exception of the non-substantive change to re-number R307-410-
5(1)[(d)] to R307-410-5(1)(c)(i)(C). The August 29, 2014 submittal's
newly amended rule supersedes and replaces all previous versions of
submittals of R307-101-3, General Requirements, Version of Code of
Federal Regulations Incorporated by Reference. EPA proposes to approve
the August 29, 2014 revisions. Previous submittals were received on
January 28, 2010, September 16, 2010, April 26, 2012 and November 4,
2013. No further EPA action is required on these earlier submittals.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the Utah Division of Air Quality rules regarding rules,
general requirements, and test methods discussed in section II,
Analysis of the State Submittals, of this preamble. The EPA has made,
and will continue to make, these documents generally available
electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the
appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
actions, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves some state law as
meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
in a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 3, 2015.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2015-15158 Filed 6-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P